2020 DPWH Department Orders

P" t;.
13 () fJ{}lf-
Republic of the Philippines 0/ _ /~ ).<»)A
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
CENTRAL OFFICE
Manila
JAN 0 7 2020
DEPARTMENT ORDER ) SUBJECT Revised Schedule of Fees and
) Charges for Laboratory
NO.
Series of 2020
11
;(l~/.
l
Ie/. ~).1)
Testing
Materials
of Construction
By virtue of Administrative Order No. 31, Series of 2012 pursuant to DOF-DBM-NEDA Joint
Circular No. 1-2013 prescribing the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) on the
rationalization of rates and fees and charges, increase in existing rates, and imposition of new
fees and charges of all government agencies and/or entities, the attached Revised Schedule
of Fees and Charges for Laboratory Testing of Construction Materials is hereby prescribed,
and shall take effect fifteen (15) days after the last publication in a newspaper of general
circulation.
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary
Departrrent of Public Works and Highways

Office of the Secretary
1111111111111111111111111111111111111
WINOU01792
Department Order No. _,_, _.
Series of 2020
Attachment
Page 1 of 11
SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES

FOR LABORATORY TESTING OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
OLD RATE
KIND OF TEST/SERVICE NEW RATE
2015
I. SOIL
1. Grading 240.00 290.00
2. liquid Limit 140.00 170.00
3. Plastic Limit 140.00 170.00
4. Shrinkage Limit 180.00 220.00
5. Moisture Content 75.00 90.00
6. Compaction (Proctor) 680.00 820.00
7. Compaction (Modified) 770.00 930.00
8. Field Density 400.00 480.00
9. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) 1,390.00 1,670.00
10. Penetration (CBR), per molded 110.00 140.00
specimen
11. Swell (CBR), per molded specimen 110.00 140.00
12. Specific Gravity 190.00 230.00
13. Unit Weight
Disturbed Samples 140.00 170.00
Undisturbed Samples 140.00 170.00
14. Combined Sieve and Hydrometer 600.00 720.00
15. Consolidation 1,580.00 1,900.00
16. Consolidation of wet and dry specimen 1,870.00 2,250.00
Under a 10 psi unit load (correction factor for "k"
value)
17. Direct Shear 2,490.00 2,990.00
18. Direct Shear one loading 1,540.00 1,850.00
19. Triaxial Compression 3,744.00 4,500.00
20. Triaxial Compression one loading 3,000.00 3,600.00
21. Unconfined Compression per Test 430.00 520.00
22. Compression including molding 240.00 290.00
(Soil-Stabilization) per molded specimen
23. Absorption (Soil-Stabilization) 240.00 290.00
24. Wash Loss 140.00 170.00
II. AGGREGATES AND SOIL AGGREGATES

(For sub-base, base and surface course)
1. Grading 240.00 290.00
2. Material Finer than No. 200 Sieve 200.00 240.00
3. Combined Sieve and Hydrometer 600.00 720.00
4. Crushing 240.00 290.00
5. Unit Weight, Loose and Rodded 175.00 210.00
6. Liquid Limit 140.00 170.00
7. Plastic Limit 140.00 170.00
Department Order "No. -1L
Series of 2020
Attachment
Page 2 of 11

OLD RATE
2015
8. Specific Gravity and Absorption 240.00 290.00
9. Absorption 140.00 170.00
11. Moisture Content 110.00 140.00
12. Abrasion 500.00 600.00
13. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) 1,390.00 1,670.00
14. Stripping 410.00 500.00
15. Triaxial Mix with Asphalt, complete with
Laboratory Compacted Density, Absorption
Swell and Stability Characteristics
a) First Trial 1,880.00 2,260.00
b) Each Extra Trial 1,190.00 1,430.00
16. Swell characteristics with bituminous materials 410.00 500.00
17. % Fractured Face 140.00 170.00
18. Soundness 415.00 500.00
19. Organic Impurities 290.00 350.00
20. Trial Mix (Concrete Design) given cement factor 1,330.00 1,600.00
21. Trial Mix (Concrete Design) given strength:
a) First Trial 1,270.00 1,530.00
b) Each Extra Trial 980.00 1,180.00
22. Air Content of Fresh Mixed Concrete 200.00 240.00
23. Mortar Strength, 7 days 240.00 290.00
24. Trial Mix with asphalt for Marshall 680.00 820.00
25. Particles with specific gravity less than 2.00 200.00 240.00
26. Clay Clumps in Aggregates 120.00 150.00
III. HYDRAULIC CEMENT

1. Fineness by #200 Sieve 110.00 140.00
3. Normal Consistency 110.00 140.00
4. Time of Setting by Gillmore Needles 95.00 120.00
5. Soundness by Pat Test 95.00 120.00
6. Soundness by Autoclave Expansion 335.00 410.00
7. Compressive Strength: 1 day 165.00 200.00
Compressive Strength: 3 days 165.00 200.00
8. Air Content 165.00 200.00
9. Loss on Ignition 180.00 220.00
10. Insoluble Residue 190.00 230.00
11. Sulfur Trioxide (Cement) 190.00 230.00
12. Maqnesium Oxide 190.00 230.00
Department Order'No . .1l-
Series of 2020
Attachment
Page 3 of 11

OLD RATE
2015
13. Silicon Dioxide 190.00 230.00
14. Aluminum Oxide 240.00 290.00
15. Ferric Oxide 240.00 290.00
16. Calcium Oxide 240.00 290.00
IV. BITUMINOUS MATERIALS

1. Penetration 165.00 200.00
2. Ductility 335.00 410.00
3. Softening Point 240.00 290.00
4. Float Test 240.00 290.00
5. Viscosity 240.00 290.00
6. Distillation
a) Emulsified Asphalt 455.00 550.00
b) Cut-back, Tar and Petroleum Products 550.00 660.00
7. Storage Stability 180.00 220.00
9. Loss on Heating 180.00 220.00
10. % Bitumen
a) Solubility in Carbon Disulfide 240.00 290.00
b) Solubility in Carbon Tetrachloride 240.00 290.00
11. Spot Test 250.00 300.00
12. Flash and Fire Point 180.00 220.00
13. Cement Mixing 180.00 220.00
14. Sieve Test 180.00 220.00
15. Modified Miscibility 335.00 410.00
16. Water Content 320.00 390.00
17. Stone Coating 110.00 140.00
18. Settlement Test 240.00 290.00
19. Residue of Specified Penetration 335.00 410.00
20. Particle Charge Test 260.00 320.00
V. BITUMINOUS MIXTURES
(Including Rock Asphalt)
1. Extraction (Bitumen Content) 320.00 390.00
2. Swell and Stability Characteristics with 1,164.00 1,400.00
Laboratory Compacted Density and Absorption
3. Density and % Voids of Compacted Mixtures 170.00 210.00
4. Marshall Stability/Immersion-Compression 325.00 390.00
5. Field Density 322.00 390.00
6. Grading 240.00 290.00
Department Order"No.-11-
Series of 2020
Attachment
Page 4 of 11

OLD RATE
KIND OF TEST/SERVICE ill
NEW RATE
2015
VI. MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS (CHEMICAL)
1. Lime, Limestone, Clay Shakes and Slags
a) Chemical Analysis, per constituent 240.00 290.00
b) Loss on Ignition 200.00 240.00
c) Moisture Content 180.00 220.00
d) Residue 110.00 140.00
e) Grading 240.00 290.00
2. Premolded Expansion Joint Filler
a) Absorption 350.00 420.00
b) Compression and Recovery 340.00 410.00
c) Thickness 140.00 170.00
d) Density 170.00 210.00
3. Paint and Paint Materials:
a) Paint composition on ready mixed paint 1,140.00 1,370.00
b) Pigment composition each constituent 340.00 410.00
c) Viscosity (Stormer Viscometer) 240.00 290.00
d) Analysis of varnish 1,680.00 2,020.00
e) Analysis of Aluminum Pigment 1,140.00 1,370.00
f) Analysis of Linseed Oil 1,760.00 2,120.00
g) Analysis of Reflectorized
Traffic Paints Type I (White) 3,350.00 4,020.00
(Yellow) 3,700.00 4,440.00
Traffic Paints Type II (White) 2,690.00 3,230.00
(Yellow) 3,010.00 3,620.00
h) Analysis of Reflectorized Thermoplastic
Traffic Paints (White and Yellow)
h.1) Specific Gravity 280.00 340.00
h.2) Softening Point 345.00 420.00
h.3) Drying Time 105.00 130.00
hA) Appearance of Paint Film 105.00 130.00
h.5) Tackiness 105.00 130.00
h.6) Thickness 110.00 140.00
h.7) Vehicle Binder (%m) 1,610.00 1,940.00
h.8) Glass Beads Content (%m) 555.00 670.00
h.9) Glass Beads Grading 120.00 150.00
i) Red Lead and Red Oxide Primer 1,800.00 2,160.00
j) Latex, Flatwall and Quick Dry Enamel 1,480.00 1,780.00
4. Water
a) Suitability for Concreting 1,400.00 1,680.00
b) Special Determination per Constituents 275.00 330.00
c) Ph Test 275.00 330.00
d) Total Solid 275.00 330.00
Department Order-No. ~
Series of 2020
Attachment
Page 5 of 11

OLD RATE
2015
e) Sulfate 275.00 330.00
f) Chloride 275.00 330.00
5. Galvanized Iron and Steel Sheets
a) Zinc Coating
1. For the first sample 240.00 290.00
2. For each additional sample 140.00 170.00
b) Gauge Determination 110.00 140.00
c) Bend and Flaking Test 110.00 140.00
6. Reflective Sheetings
a) Thickness 140.00 170.00
b) Adhesion 250.00 300.00
c) Shrinkage 250.00 300.00
d) Flexibility 250.00 300.00
e) Heat Resistance 510.00 620.00
f) Solvent Resistance 510.00 620.00
g) Reflectivity 140.00 170.00
7. Curing Compound 1,730.00 2,080.00
8. Elastomeric, Hot-Applied Joint Sealant/Concrete Joint
Sealer (Hot Poured)
a) Pour Point Temperature 240.00 290.00
b) Safe Heating Temperature 240.00 290.00
c) Flow 340.00 410.00
d) Penetration (Cone) 170.00 210.00
e) Softening Point 400.00 480.00
9. Mineral Filler
a) Plasticity 255.00 310.00
b) Grading 240.00 290.00
c) Loss on Ignition 180.00 220.00
VII. CONCRETE AND CEMENT PRODUCTS

1. Molded Concrete Samples
a) Compressive strength of concrete cubes 120.00 150.00
6" x 6"
b) Compressive strength of concrete cylinders
1.) 6"x12" 120.00 150.00
2.) 8"x16" 140.00 170.00
c) Flexural strength of concrete beams 140.00 170.00
6"x 6" in cross-section
2. Cutting of concrete samples to standard sized for 380.00 460.00
strength determination
3. Pipes and Rain Test
a) Water absorption 180.00 220.00
Department Order" No. --1.1.-
Series of 2020
Attachment
Page 6 of 11

OLD RATE
2015
b) Water absorption with coefficient of saturation 240.00 290.00
c) Dimension measurement 110.00 140.00
d) Reinforcement measurement 110.00 140.00
e) Strength
1. Non-reinforced
a) 10" nominal size and under 420.00 510.00
b) Over 10" to 18 nominal size 550.00 660.00
2. Reinforced
a) 24" nominal size and under 620.00 750.00
b) Over 24" to 30" nominal size 790.00 950.00
c) Over 30" to 42" nominal size 1,040.00 1,250.00
d) Over 42" to 60" nominal size 1,705.00 2,050.00
4. Masonry building units and paving blocks:
a) Complete test for 10-units sample of concrete 1,540.00 1,850.00
and clay hollow blocks
b) Compressive strength 140.00 170.00
c) Moisture content 180.00 220.00
d) Water absorption and moisture content 180.00 220.00
e)Water absorption and coefficient saturation 240.00 290.00
f) Dimension measurement 110.00 140.00
g) Flexural strength 180.00 220.00
5. Flooring Materials
a) Flexural Strength
1. Cement tiles 2 cm x 20 cm x 20 cm 290.00 350.00
nominal size and under per 5-unit
sample
2. Slabs 4 cm x 50 cm x 50 cm maximum 180.00 220.00
nominal size per unit
6. Asbestos Cement Sheets
a) Flexural Strength
1. Flat sheets, per 3 standard test specimen or 270.00 330.00
less
2. For each additional standard test specimen 110.00 140.00
3. Corrugated sheets per 3 standard test 340.00 410.00
specimens or less
b) Water Absorption
1. For 3 standard test specimen 340.00 410.00
7. Asbestos Cement Pipes
a) Crushing strength
1. 10" nominal size and under 240.00 290.00
Department Order "No • ..lL-
Series of 2020
Attachment
Page 7 of 11

OLD RATE
2015
2. Over 10" to 18" nominal size 340.00 410.00
3. Over 18" to 30" nominal size 470.00 570.00
b) Flexural strength for pipes 8" nominal size and 240.00 290.00
under
VIII. FERROUS AND NON-FERROUS METAL AND

ALLIED PRODUCTS
1. Steel Bars for complete reinforcement
a) Complete Test
1. For Plain Bars 940.00 1,130.00
2. For Deformed Bars 1,070.00 1,290.00
b) Tensile Properties 200.00 240.00
c) Bending Properties 120.00 150.00
d) Deformation Measurement 120.00 150.00
e) Variation in Weight 110.00 140.00
2. Cast iron pipes and centrifugally cast pipes
a) Hydraulic test cast iron soil pipes 470.00 570.00
b) Hydraulic test with test pressure over 50 psi 680.00 820.00
up to 1000 psi for pipes 10" nominal size and
under
c) Flexural strength standard test bars, A, B, C 340.00 410.00
d) Tensile properties prepared standard test 340.00 410.00
specimen
e) Dimension Measurement 110.00 140.00
f) Chemical Analysis
1. Sulfur Content 470.00 570.00
2. Phosphorous content 340.00 410.00
3. Steel Pipes
a) Hydrostatic test with test pressure over 50 psi 680.00 820.00
up to 1000 psi for pipes 10" nominal size and
under
b) Dimension Measurement 80.00 100.00
c) Weight Determination 110.00 140.00
d) Weight of Coating 680.00 820.00
e) Thickness or uniformly of coating by 470.00 570.00
Preece Test Method
4. High Tensile Wire/Wire Mesh/Wire
Ropes/Gabion/Mattress/Tie Wire/Steel Plates
a) Tensile properties for wire from gage 10 up 240.00 290.00
b) Ductility of wire 240.00 290.00
c) Adherence of coating 240.00 290.00
d) Uniformlv of coatinq bv Preece Test Method 240.00 290.00
Department Order No. ~
Series of 2020
Attachment
Page 8 of 11

OLD RATE
2015
e) Weight of Coating 340.00 410.00
f) Breaking strength of wire ropes
1. 1h" nominal size and under 470.00 570.00
2. Over 1h" to 1" nominal size 680.00 820.00
g) Dimension Measurement 110.00 140.00
5. Standard Test Specimens and Miscellaneous Metal
Products
a) Tensile properties of prepared test specimen 500.00 600. 00
b) Hardness Test, Brinnel or Rockwell:
1. For the first specimen 240.00 290.00
2. For each additional specimen 110.00 140.00
c) Impact Test, Charpy, Izod or Tensile
prepared test specimen
1. For the first test specimen 240.00 290.00
2. For each additional test specimen 110.00 140.00
d) Wheel borrow check test 685.00 830.00
e) Cast iron manhole frame and cover 685.00 830.00
check test
f) Load test, hydraulic jacks, not over 3,350.00 4,020.00
50 tonnes capacity
g) Chemical analysis per element sulfur 340. 00 410.00
h) Reflective Pavement Studs 500.00 600.00
(Flexural Strength)
IX. MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS (MECHANICAL)

1. Fiber Rope
a) Tensile Strength
1. For ropes 1" in nominal size and under 340.00 410.00
2. Over 1" up to 2" in nominal size 470.00 570.00
3. Over 2" up to 3" in nominal size 680.00 820.00
2. PVC Materials
a) Tensile Strength - 1,200.00
b) Flexural Strength - 1,200.00
c) Notched Izod Impact - 780.00
d) Heat Deflection Temperature - 1,200.00
3. Geotextile
a) Grab Tensile Length - 930.00
b) Elongation - 150.00
c) Puncture Strength - 2,616.00
d) Apparent Opening Size - 2,976.00
e) Permittivity - 660.00
Department Order'No. J.L
Series of 2020
Attachment
Page 9 of 11

OLD RATE
2015
4. Carbon Fiber Sheet
a) Tensile Strength (Single Strand) - 1,320.00
5. Coconet
a) Dimension Measurement - 140.00
b) Tensile Strength - 1,290.00
c) Elongation - 150.00
d) Water Absorption - 220.00
6. Seven (7) Wire Strand
a) Tensile properties - 290.00
b) Ductility of wire - 290.00
c) Breaking strength - 570.00
d) Dimension Measurement - 140.00
X. MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES
1. Plate Bearing Test and/or Subgrade Modulus 5,350.00 6,420.00
Determination (k value Uncorrected), fixed charge
up to 100 tons
2. Load Test on Piles, fixed charge up to 100 tons 9,350.00 11,220.00
3. Resistivity Test
a) Rental of equipment, per day or fraction, 1,140.00 1,370.00
thereof
4. Concrete Core Drilling
a) Rental of equipment, per day or fraction 610.00 740.00
thereof
b) Per core drilled 1,140.00 1,370.00
XI. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

1. Mobilization 7,540.00 9050.00
2. Demobilization 9,540.00 11,450.00
3. Drilling Through
a) Ordinary Soil, per Linear Meter 1,270.00 1,530.00
b) Gravel/Rocks, using DiamondjTungsten bit, 2,510.00 3,020.00
per Linear Meter
c) Standard Penetration Test (SPT), per SPT 60.00 80.00
4. Hole to Hole Transfer, per move 2,510.00 3,020.00
5. Core Box, per box 1,200.00 1,440.00
6. Miscellaneous Expenses (During Operation)
a) Diesel oil for Drilling Machine/Water Pump 550.00 660.00
(per day)
b) Diesel/Gasoline for Service Vehicle 275.00 330.00
(per day)
Department Order No. --1L-
Series of 2020
Attachment
Page 10 of 11

OLD RATE
2015
c) Water Supply Source, per day 240.00 290.00
d) Plastic bags, Pentel pen, etc. 1,200.00 1,440.00
XII. NON-DESTRUCTIVE TEST EQUIPMENT

(HOURLY RENTAL RATE)
1. Metal and Rebar Detectors 81.00 98.00
2. Concrete Rebound Hammer 42.00 50.00
3. Dynamic Cone Penetrometer 44.00 53.00
4. Reinforced Concrete Detective Radar for 395.00 474.00
Substructure with Printer
5. High Performance Infrared Thermal Imager 308.00 370.00
6. Ultrasonic Tester for Concrete Cracks 52.00 63.00
7. Half Cell (Chloride Ion Penetration Tester) 61.00 73.00
8. Micro core Apparatus 165.00 198.00
9. Portable Compression Testing Machine 78.00 94.00
10. Handled Retroreflectometer 161.00 193.00
11. Small Falling Weight Deflectometer System 264.00 317.00
12. Skid Resistance and Friction Tester (Skid Tester) 159.00 191.00
13. Non - Nuclear Density and Moisture Meter 190.00 228. 00
14. Portable Multi-Use Water Quality Standard Sensor 123.00 148.00
module with 100m
15. Laser Type Digital meter 19.00 23.00
16. Portable Digital Clinometer 16.00 19.00
XIII. CALIBRATION EQUIPMENT

(HOURLY RENTAL RATE)
1. Universal Calibrating Machine - 3,210.00
2. Load Cells for Loading Machine (UTM, Compression
Machine, CBRjMarshali Machine)
a) Capacity 25 kN - 34.00
b) Capacity 50 kN - 50.00
c) Capacity 300 kN - 82.00
d) Capacity 600 kN - 84.00
e) Capacity 1000 kN - 86.00
f) Capacity 2000 kN - 87.00
3. Calibrated Glass Beads for Finer Sieves - 3.00
4. Calibrated Glass Beads for Coarser Sieves - 3.00
5. Eyepiece with scale, readable to 0.001 mm - 23.00
6. Half-tone screen Determiner - 2.00
7. Caliper for Sieves Calibration (Small to Large Sieve - 12.00
Sizes)
a) Caliper, readable to 0.001 mm (for sieves finer - 10.00
Department Order'No. _,_,_
Series of 2020
Attachment
Page 11 of 11

OLD RATE
KIND OF TEST/SERVICE II
NEW RATE
2015
than 2.36 mm No.9 coarser)
b) Caliper with 8" or larger maximum opening size - 12.00
c) Caliper, capable of measuring height and inside - 14.00
diameter molds
d) Caliper, readable to 0.1 mm - 10.00
e) Caliper, readable to 0.02 mm - 9.00
8. Calibration Blocks - 14.00
9. Calibration Weights (set consists of 10g-10kg) - 67.00
stainless
10. Thermometer up to 1000 °C - 3.00
fB7.13 D ft
Republic of the Philippines Ol.lff.:W
CENTRAL OFFICE
Manila
JAN 0 7 2020
DEPARTMENTORDER ) SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Calibration and
) Registration of Engineering Survey
Equipment of the DPWH Implementing
12 ) Offices
NO. of 2020
Series cptor )
01.15. ?oaJ
In order to ensure the reliability and accuracy of survey results of the engineering survey
equipment used in various DPWH Infrastructure projects, survey equipment should be registered
and regularly calibrated. To ensure that only fully calibrated survey equipment are used in the
conduct of engineering surveys, the following provisions are hereby prescribed:
1. Survey equipment such as Global Navigational Satellite System (GNSS) Equipment, Total
Station, Digital Level and Smart Stations shall not be used in the DPWH projects without a
valid Certificate of Calibration.
2. Calibration shall be conducted on a regular basis as indicated in the Certificate of Calibration

of the above-mentioned survey equipment from the Authorized Service Center.
3. Above-mentioned equipment owned by the Department shall be registered with the Land
Management Bureau (LMB)jLand Management Service (LMS) of the Department of
Environment and National Resources.
4. All Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) j Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPAs) j Drones, either for
survey, inspection, monitoring and documentation purposes, shall be registered with the
Bureau of Design (BOD) for inventory and monitoring purposes using the attached
Registration Form.
5. DPWH Regional Offices shall be responsible in ensuring that the survey equipment of their
respective District Engineering Offices have a valid Certificate of Calibration, and shall submit
to BOD the status of calibration every end of the year.
6. Consultants involved in the engineering surveys of DPWH infrastructure projects shall also
ensure that all engineering survey equipment mentioned above and used in the proj~ct shall
be registered with the LMB and duly calibrated.
This Order shall take effect immediately.
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary
, u
5.1. AMDjEKS
Department of Public Works and Highways
1111111111111111111111111111111111111
WINOR01522
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENTOF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
CENTRAL OFFICE
Port Area, Manila
UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV)/ DRONE

REGISTRATION FORM
In compliance with Department Order No. 12. , series of 2020 - Calibration and Registration
of Engineering Survey Equipment, request is hereby made for registration of:
Property No.:
Serial No.:
Date of Acquisition:
Brand and Model:
End User/Position:
Attachments: o Photo of the Equipment
o Property Acknowledgement Receipt
Submitted by:
District Engineer/Regional Director
To be filled up by the BOD:
Date of Registration:
Registration No.:
Approved by:
Bureau Director
U1~iU .,IJ/'p.)/f
Republic of the Philippines - CY- #_"U) ~
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
Manila
JAN 1 4 2020
DEPARTMENT ORDER ) SUBJECT: Amendment to D.O. No. 112, s. 2019 re:
"Revised Design Standards for Tourism
NO.
15 ~
)
and Farm to Market Roads"
Series of 2020;i\v'.'('.~~
For consistency, and to further provide specific guidelines in the design standards for tourism
and farm to market road projects, the following modifications in the hereunder specified design
elements and requirements for tourism and farm to market roads per D.O. No. 112, s. 2019 are
hereby prescribed:
Farm to Market Road

Design Elements
Per D.O. 112, s. 2019 This Amendment
Minimum of 6.1m for two-lanes Minimum of 6.1m for two-lanes

Pavement Width • Average daily traffic between • Average daily traffic of 200 and
200 - 400 above
Bridges • 4.60m (for 4.0m roadway width) • S.60m (for S.Om roadway width)
Carriageway Width • 5.60m (for 5.0m roadway width) • 6.70m (for 6.1m roadway width)
Tourism and Farm to Market Roads
Per D.O. 112, s. 2019 This Amendment
Slope Protection As needed Requirement and selection of type as per

attached "Annex A"
All the other design standards specified in Department Order No. 112, s. 2019 shall remain
enforced until such future amendments or revision relative thereto is issued.
~~--
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary
5.1 DLBjECMjAMD

1111111111111111111111111111111111111
WINOR01523
Annex "A"
Selection of Slope Failure Countermeasures
.......
Protecting the slope Surface water Preventing surface water from flowing on the One of the It is used in almost all works. Its cost is low
from the action of rain drainage work slope by rapidly collecting and draining surface most basic and it is very cost-effective. This method
Drainage works water outside the slope. It includes drainage methods, it includes drainage channels that drain the
channels at the top of the slope, berm drainage is rarely collected water out of the slope area.
works, slope toe drainage channels, longitudinal used
drainage channels, permeation prevention work, alone, but
and check dams almost
always
Underground Stabilizing the slope by draining the with It is used at locations where landslide type
water drainage underground water seepage to lower the pore another failure is predicted or where there is a lot of
work water pressure. It includes culvert work, method. underground water. It is often used for work
impervious wall works, collection well, etc. smaller than landslide prevention work.
Slope Protection Sodding work It includes spreading seeds, soil dressing, thick When the principal method is vegetation, it is a cut slope
work using layer spraying method, vegetation network, sand with lillie spring water, where in principle, a standard slope
vegetation bag works, sodding, vegetation pots, and gradient can be guaranteed.
transplanting. It is done to prevent rainwater
erosion, reduce surface temperature and It is superior because it harmonizes the slope with its
~ beautify slopes by reforestation. surrounding environment.
I/)
-t:0 I/)
Spraying Sprayed mortar or Preventing erosion of the slope along with It is suitable for rock with lillie spring water, which has only a
3:
-t:0 shotcrete weathering of the slope and a decline in the few cracks, and where a large failure has not occurred. Its
ec 3:
ec strength of the ground that forms the slopes by use is premised on a full study of its durability and of its
0
blocking it from the atmosphere, rainwater, etc. impact on the environment.
u 0
u I/)
l!! Stone pitching, Preventing weathering, erosion, and fine Stone pitChing or block pitching is pitching is used on slopes
::> block pitching, separation or failure etc. of slopes. with a gradient less than 1:1.0 that are suitable for
ti
2 concrete slab vegetation work, and on slopes of non-cohesive sand or
iil Pitching pitching hard plan pan and fragile clay. Concrete pitching is used on
>- Work rock slopes or slopes of compacted soil with developed
.c
I/) Concrete pitching joints and a steep gradient greater than 1:1.0 that would
-t:0 presumably be unstable with spraying or pre-cast grating
3: crib works.
c:
0
Pre-cast grating Cast-in-place concrete or pre-cast grating crib Pre-cast crib works are used on slopes with a gradient
M crib works works are assembled on the slope and either gentler than 1:1.0 and cast-in-place grating crib works are
e
Q. vegetation is planted or concrete poured inside used on steep slopes. The vertical height of pre-cast
Q)
Q. them to prevent weathering/erosion of the slope. grating crib works is, in principle, no higher than 5 m, and if
en0 Grating
Crib
Pre-cast grating crib works that have been
developed provide preventive effects.
it is greater than this, separation walls are installed at
intervals of 10 m in the vertical direction. But where berms
works Cast-in-place Cast-in-place concrete grating crib works also cannot be formed, the cast-in-place method is used.
concrete grating have a preventive effect. The cast-in-place
crib works grating crib work methods include spraying crib
works
Page 1/3 of Annex "A"

Work Sub· '
category
'Purpose or Details of the Work
"
' ..
!, i:,
~ ~' ::' ,1 "' .J ' ~; ,
Protecting the slope Others Other slope These include plastic soil cement works, net Because of their durability and environmental properties,
from the action of rain protection works works, fluid synthetic resin spray works, mat- these are not appropriate for steep slope failure
covering works, asphalt slope works, etc., and countermeasures, and are rarely used for these purposes.
are intended to prevent erosion. But they are used for temporary works or partial use.
_, Excluding slopes Cutting unstable Cutting work (A) Overhangs are cut, unstable surface soil layers One of the most basic countermeasures, it is also one of the
- !::!. where there is a high soil mass are cut, and unfixed stones removed, to most reliable if it is thoroughly implemented. It is often used
,g ~ probability of failure eliminate soil layers or rock mass at risk of along with drainage works, vegetation works, and structural
g !i! under the action of collapse. protection works using structures.
t) :> rainfall
Balancing 0 forces to Cutting work that Cutting works (B) Cutting the slope to a gradient or height It is one of the most basic countermeasures, and one of the
prevent failure even improves the necessary to maintain its safety even under the most reliable methods when it is executed safely. It is often
under the action of shape of the action of rainfall combined with drainage works, vegetation works, or slope
rainfall slope, protection works based on structures. It is often impossible
to execute it completely, when homes are constructed close
to the top or bottom of the slope or when the volume of cut
soil would be huge, so it is often combined with another
method (retaining wall, etc.).
Retaining wall Stone masonry or Preventing small failure at the bottom of the When it is a soil slope with gradient steeper than 1:1.0
block masonry slope. (normally 0.3:1 to 0.5:1), and the earth pressure is low
retaining wall because the ground behind it is firm.
Leaning concrete In addition to directly preventing failure, It can be used on ground with inadequate solidity: less than
wall effectively protects the slope from erosion and of gravelly ground. Even in a narrow space, it is compatible
weathering. with changing topography without taking space.
Gravity concrete Directly preventing failure, stabilizing It is used to stabilize the bottom (toe) of slopes, and to
retaining wall counterweight fill, and providing a foundation for prevent failure. It is used in the middle parts of slopes.
slope protection works.
Concrete crib Preventing small failures and stabilizing slopes Because of its good permeability and its flexibility, it is suited
retaining wall with a lot of spring water and relatively soft for places where there is a lot of spring water and the
ground. ground is soft, or to prevent landslide type failure.
Anchor works Ground anchor It is used along with cast-in-place concrete It is appropriate for cases where there are dwellings at the
work and rock bolt grating crib work, concrete retaining wall work, top or bottom of the slope, if cutting work, passive retaining
work concrete pitching work, or other wall work, etc. cannot be done, if the slope gradient is steep
countermeasures to stabilize these works in and the slope is long, and cast-in-place grating crib work,
order to prevent failure and sliding of severely concrete grating crib work, concrete pitching work, etc. are
weathered rock, rock with many cracks, and not stable enough. It is particularly appropriate when the
surface soil. It also anchors rock that is cracked, ground or rock to which the anchor is fixed is relatively solid'
has joints, or bedding stratification to rock that is and shallower than the slope surface.
internally stable to prevent its failure and
separation.

· .,. ., ., ". , Application Range and Special Features
I
, "
J , '" '?
Pile works Pile work Installing piles in a slope so that the bending It is used in special cases of steep slope failure prevention
moment and shear resistance of the piles resist work. It is used to prevent failure of slopes where landslide
sliding force to improve the stability of the slope. type failure is predicted and of bedrock slopes that act as
dip slopes.
Counterweight fill Counterweight fill Fonning an embankment at the bottom of a It is rarely executed by itself, because there is little room for
work work place where failure is predicted to stabilize it by execution on a steep slope. It is executed along with a
resisting sliding force. gravity retaining wall.
Others Preventing falling rocks Rock fall Rock fall Work intended to prevent rocks from falling. It Cutting work, drainage work Usually provided as a
countenneasure protection work includes rock removal and foot protection works. grating crib work, spraying supplementary measure
work work and pitching work are with failure prevention work.
also used to prevent rocks
from falling.
Method of protecting dwellings etc. from falling Its foundation is often made
rocks. It includes preventive network, preventive by combining it with
fence work and preventive retaining wall work. retaining wall work.
Methods that combine the functions Fence work Earth retaining Used to prevent failure in cases of relatively It is appropriate for relatively large slopes. It can be
of control work and prevention work fence work gentle slope with a thin surface soil layer and executed while preserving existing vegetation on the slope.
prevent such failure from spreading.
Wicker work Used as supplement to vegetation work in order It is used along with vegetation work and slope grating crib
to prevent erosion of the surface soil of the slope work on relatively gentle slopes where cutting work has
by rain and surface water. been done.
Gabion work Gabion work Preventing slope erosion and acting as As a steep slope failure prevention work method, it should
counterweight fill work. not be used to completely cover the slope. There are cases
where it is used as a provisional method in a transitional
area with adjoining natural ground.
Work methods that prevent damage Passive work Passive concrete In cases where it would be difficult to directly It should be used along with methods executed to improve
when failure occurs retaining wall work prevent failure of a slope, a gravity retaining wall slope conditions as much as possible. It is often used on
is constructed at a distance from the bottom large slopes. It is effective when it is necessary to preserve
(toe) of the slope to halt the soil produced by a the existing vegetation as much as possible.
failure.
Protective work used during Temporary Temporary Protecting lives and properties from collapsed The installation of temporary protective fence work is
execution of prevention work protective work protective fence soil and falling rocks during the construction of required when executing steep slope failure prevention
work failure prevention work. work.
Note: Actual application is subject to slope stability analysis using actual parameters
Source: DPWH Design Guidelines, Criteria and Standards 2015, Volume 4 - Highway Design

~lJ.1.3 lJ~fI
Republic of the Philippines G)/_ ~-:W.z:A)
CENTRAL OFFICE
Manila
JAN f 4 202rr
Department Order ) SUBJECT: Technical Manuals and Guidelines
on Bridge Seismic Design
No.
18 l
)
Series of 2020 ~/. -:"3.~"X)
In line with the commitment, goal, and objective of the Department to enhance the technical
knowledge and capabilities of our engineers specifically on safety, cost effectiveness, quality,
and efficiency of bridge seismic design, the following technical manuals are hereby prescribed
as guide in the preparation of bridge plans by all DPWH Regional Offices, District Engineering
Offices, Project Management Office Clusters and Engineering Consultants of the Department:
1. 2019 Interim Revision for LRFD Seismic Design Specifications

2. BSDS Design Standard Guide Manual
3. Highway Bridge Seismic Isolation Design Specifications
4. Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Bridges
The aforementioned technical manuals, which were prepared and developed jointly by the
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Road and Bridge Experts, CTI Engineering
International Co. Ltd., and members of the DPWH Technical Working Group (TWG), can be
downloaded from the DPWH Intranet (http:dpwhnet) under Bureau of Design - Manuals for
easy reference.
('
~ -v;:---
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary
5.1 BSR/ECM/AMD

1111111111111111111111111111111111111
WINOR01525
CENTRAL OFFICE
Manila
JAN 14 1020
DEPARTMENT ORDER ) SUBJECT: Updated Standard Plans For Single
Span Flat Slab Bridge And Multi-
NO. 19 ) l Span Reinforced Concrete Deck

Girder (RCDG) And Pre-Stressed
Series of 2020 <:7jDt.:>-?,.;->JA) Concrete Deck Girder (PCDG)
Bridges
In line with the issuance of Department Order No. 179 series of 2015, re: DPWH Design
Guidelines, Criteria and Standards (DGCS), 2015 Edition; updated standard plans for the
design of single span flat slab bridge and multi-span RCDG and PCDG bridges are now
available for reference.
The issuance of these standard plans aims to ensure the safety, cost effectiveness and
development of high quality design of bridges adapting to the industry's best practice in
structural design. The said plans shall serve as guide for District Engineering Offices, Regional
Offices, Project Management Office Clusters and Engineering Consultants in the preparation
of bridge plans based on the revised guidelines.
The updated standard plans consist of three (3) sets, covering the design details, design
criteria, material and construction specifications, as follows:
Set 1 - Single Span Flat Slab Bridge

8 meters
10 meters
12 meters
Set 2 - Multi-Span Reinforced Concrete Deck Girder (RCDG) Bridge
15 meters
18 meters
20 meters
Set 3 - Multi-Span Pre-Stressed Concrete Deck Girder (PCDG) Bridge
25 meters
30 meters
35 meters
The aforementioned plans may be downloaded from the DPWH Intranet (http:dpwhnet) under
Bureau of Design - Standard Plans.
"
~~
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary Departrrent of PUblic Works and Highways
1111111111111111111111111111111111111
5.1.4 BSR/ECM/AMD WINOR01524
&1 I). /J./J f'tJ If
20 - iJ"'f,;'I >t _~'X>
Manila
FEB 2 7 2020
DEPARTMENTORDER ) SUBJECT: Guidelines and Checklists of
3a ~ Requirements in the Preparation of

Engineering Plan for Feasibility
NO. ) Study (FS) and Conceptual Design
Series of 2020~. >iI.}.b,,) Plan for Highways, Bridges, and
Water Engineering Projects
To ensure uniformity and clearly define the engineering plan components for the Feasibility
Study and Conceptual Design Plans for highways, bridges, and water engineering projects,
the following guidelines and attached checklists marked as Annexes "A1, A2, and A3" and
Annexes "B1, B2, and B3", respectively, are hereby prescribed for the guidance and
compliance of the Consultants and concerned offices of this Department:
A. Feasibility Study Engineering Plan: Part of the study report shall be the preparation of
engineering plans for three (3) or more possible options/schemes in the alignment and/or
design of structures considering the technical, financial, environmental, aesthetic,
economic and social aspects, among others, in order to determine the most viable scheme.
Attached are checklists of requirements in the preparation of engineering plan components
of a Feasibility Study Report (Annexes "A1, A2, and A3" for highways, bridges, and water
engineering projects, respectively).
B. Conceptual Design Plan is prepared based on the recommended option/scheme from

Feasibility Study. It is during this stage of project planning where general concepts, other
illustrations and typical details/drawings are presented. The conceptual plan will be the
basis for Detailed Engineering Design phase where the design is refined, and plans,
specifications, and estimates are established.' Attached are checklists of requirements for
preparation of conceptual design plan (Annexes "B1, B2, and B3", for highways, bridges,
and water engineering projects, respectively).
For compliance.
~ ~- --<.-----
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary
5.1.3 DLB/ECM/AMD
1II1I111 III "11111111111111111II1I1I1

WINOR01527
D.O. No.3Q.., series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
for Feasibility Study (FS) and Conceptual Design Plan for Highways, Bridges, and Water Engineering Projects
Page 2 of 26
ANNEX "Ai"
CHECKLIST FOR
FEASIBILITY STUDY
ENGINEERING PLAN
(HIGHWAYS)
D.O. No.~ series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 3 of 26
I. List of Drawings for Feasibility Study Engineering Plan (Highways)
o Location Plan and Vicinity Map

o Topographic Plan
o Typical Roadway Section
o Plan and Profile
o Detailed Cross-Sections(100m interval)
o Other Structures as may be necessary
II. Technical Reports
o GeologicalAssessmentand GeotechnicalInvestigation Report

o Test Pit/Auger Hole (500m interval)
o Traffic Data/Study Report
o Pavement Type Recommendation
o Hydrological Analysis
o Drainage Structure Recommendation
o Slope Protection Structure Recommendation
o Estimated Quantity Calculations
o Material Source Maps
III. Checklist for Feasibility Study Engineering Plan (Highways)
A. Title Sheet
Veritjt if the following are indicated:

o Project Title;
o Project length and limits; cross check its veracity in the plan and profile; and
o Convenient scale in the layout of the project.
B. Location Plan/Vicinity Map

o Location (province of city) of the project;
o Vicinity Map.
C. Topographic Plan (To be incorporated in the design plan)
o Verify and check if the Consultant conducted surveys in accordancewith the

requirements of the DPWH-DGCS,Volume 2-B Engineering Survey 2015
Edition;
o Verify if all the existing structures are reflected.
D. Typical Roadway Section

o Width of pavement and shoulder;
o Type and thickness of pavement structures;
o Pavement cross slope;
o Embankment and cut slope;
o Slope protection works; and
Checklist for Feasibility Study Engineering Plan (Highways)

D.O. No . .31> , series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 4 of 26
o Road Right-of-Way limit.
E. Plan and Profile Plan
Plan
Verifjt if the following are indicated:
o Centerline, edge of pavement, shoulder edge and road right-of-way limits;
o Stations at the centerline (at every 100m interval);
o Drainage structures (existing and proposed) with description/dimension;
o Locations and construction limits of intersecting roads;
o Contour lines with standard intervals (major contour interval with label: flat
terrain - 1.0m, rolling terrain - 5.0m, hilly/mountainous terrain - 10m);
o North Arrow Indicator;
o Description, type, and limits of slope protection works, and other roadside
facilities/structures (existing and proposed).
Profile
Verifjt if the following are indicated:
o Gradient of finished grade and natural ground profiles, and elevations plotted
at every 100m interval;
o Existing and proposed/possible locations of drainage structures (RCPC/RCBC)
including its descriptions;
o Original ground and finished/designed grade elevation at every 100m
interval; and
o Ordinary and maximum flood elevation (with respect to return period) for
drainage structures including the flooded areas/sections.
F. Detailed Cross-Sections (100m interval)
The following should be verified:

o Embankment and cut slope (if appropriate for the type of soil materials
requirement, e.g., indicated for rocks, rippable rocks, and common earth);
o Finished grade and natural ground elevations templated at lOO-meter
interval;
o If tern plating of cross-sections is consistent with the standard typical roadway
section including the requirements for superelevation and widening;
o Area of cut and fill are indicated per station, including other relevant items of
work involved; and
o Necessity and appropriateness of the indicated existing and proposed slope
protection works.
G. Structures
o Indicate all the proposed structures.
H. Others
o Indicate all other requirements as specified in the Terms of Reference.
Checklist for Feasibility Study Engineering Plan (Highways)

D.O. No.....30•series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 5 of 26
ANNEX "A2"
CHECKLIST FOR
FEASIBILITY STUDY
ENGINEERING PLAN
(BRIDGES)
D.O. No. 30 , series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 6 of 9
I. List of Drawings for Feasibility Study Engineering Plan (Bridges)
o Title Sheet
o Index of Drawings
o General Notes
o Topographic Plan (showing bridge alignment)
o Boring Data and Borehole Location
o General Plan and Elevation
o Typical Section of Superstructure
o Typical Section of Abutment
o Typical Section of Pier
o Technical Study of Alternative Types of Structure

o GeotechnicalInvestigation Report including borehole location plan, boring logs
and laboratory test results (One for each proposed abutment location and one
for proposed pier foundations at every 100m length of bridge)
D Hydrologic Analysis / Report
o Hydraulic Analysis / Report
o Philippine Coast Guard Navigational Clearance (horizontal and vertical), if
applicable
o Vertical clearance from Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP)
whenever bridge project is within the vicinity of an airport
III. Checklist for Feasibility Study Engineering Plan (Bridges)
A. Title Sheet
VerifY if the following are indicated:

o Project Title; .
o Project length (showing beginning and end stations);
o Convenient scale in the layout of the project; and
o Name and signature of approving and recommending officials.
B. Index of Drawings
o Index of drawings with sheets in correct order
C. Location Plan/Vicinity Map

D Location (province / city) of the project; and
o Vicinity Map (showing project location).
D. General Notes
o Design Codesand Specifications; and

o Material Specifications.
Checklist for Feasibility Study Engineering Plan (Bridges)

D.O. No. 3'0, series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 7 of 26
E. Topographic Plan
o Project area plotted with grid coordinate system;

o Plan/baseline map indicating the North Arrow direction, Azimuth, distance and
stationing, existing natural and man-made structures, contour lines with labels;
o Established concrete monument: Global Positioning System (GPS), Benchmarks
(BMs), and Intermediate Benchmarks (IBMs);
o Water line elevation; and
o Borehole location.
F. Boring Data and Borehole Location Plan
o Borehole Location Plan;

o Boring Logs with corresponding n-values, description and soil classification;
and
o Elevation and stationings of SPT.
G. General Plan and Elevation
o Bridge Type;
o Span Lengths and Total Bridge Length;
o Stationings (Piers, Back of Backwalls);
o Ground Profile showing the elevation of ordinary water level (OWL) and design
flood level (DFL at Qso or maximum experienced flood level (MEFL), whichever
is greater);
o Type of foundation (dimensions and arrangement of piles);
o Hydraulic data (Catchment Area, Discharge, Velocity); and
o Clear roadway and sidewalk width.
H. Typical Sections of Superstructure
Veri1Yif the following are indicated:

o Plan and Elevation (including sidewalk, railing and rail post) showing
dimensions; and
o Typical roadway cross section showing sidewalk, railing and rail post.
I. Typical Sections of Abutment

o Plan, Front and Side Elevations showing dimensions;
o Section showing backwall, wingwall, coping, shaft and footing dimensions; and
o Footing / Pile cap plan and elevation showing dimensions including pile size
and locations.
J. Typical Sections of Pier

o Section showing coping, column and footing dimensions; and
Checklist for Feasibility Study Engineering Plan (Bridges)

D.O. No.3Q., series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 8 of 26
and locations.
K. Structures
L. Others
Checklist for: Feasibility Study Engineering Plan (Bridges)

D.O. No. ~ series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 9 of 26
ANNEX "A3"
CHECKLIST FOR
FEASIBILITY STUDY
ENGINEERING PLAN
(WATER ENGINEERING PROJECTS)
D.O. No. .3Q., series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 10 of 26
I. List of Drawings for Feasibility Study Engineering Plan (Water

Engineering Projects)

o Topographic Plan
o Typical Cross Section
o Plan and Profile
o Detailed CrossSections (100m interval)
o Other Structures as may be necessary
o Topographic Survey (Ground or Aerial)

o Hydrographic Survey (Bathymetric for coastal project)
o GeologicalAssessmentand GeotechnicalInvestigation Report
o A minimum of two (2) exploration points every kilometer with maximum
spacing of SOOm
o Hydrologic Analysis (With climate change adaptation)
o Hydraulic Analysis (Water Surface Profile for different return periods with and
without improvement)
o Oceanographicand Hydrodynamic Analysis (for coastal projects)
o Inundation Map for different return periods (with and without improvement)
o Proposed Structural Measures
o Alternatives
o Comparison
o Preliminary Design
o Estimated Quantity Calculations
o Material Source Maps
III. Checklist for Feasibility Study Engineering Plan (Water Engineering

Projects)
A. Location Plan/Vicinity Map

o Location (province/city of the project);
o Vicinity Map
B. Topographic Plan (To be incorporated in the design plan)
o Alignment
o Stationing/Limits
o Contour lines with elevations
o Direction of flow
o Wave propagation direction (for coastal projects)
o Centerline
o Directional sign/informatory sign (northing)
o Existing structures (bridges, private and public structures/utilities)
o Easement Zone
Checklist for Feasibility Study Engineering Plan (Water Engineering Projects)

D.O. No. ,3'0, series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 11 of 26
C. Typical Cross Section
D Ordinary Water Level (OWL)

D Design Flood Level (DFL)
D Mean Sea Level (MSL) }
D Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) .
D Mean Higher High Water Level (MHHW) For coastal projects
D Design High Water Level (DHWL)
D Freeboard Clearance
D Type of Structure
D Side slope/s
D. Plan and Profile
Plan
Veri1)rif the following are indicated:
D Alignment
D Stationing/Limits
D Contour lines with elevations
D Direction of flow
D Wave propagation direction (for coastal projects)
D Centerline
D Directional sign/informatory sign (northing)
D Existing structures (bridges, private and public structures/utilities)
D Easement Zone
Profile
VeniY if the following are indicated:
D Stationing/Limits
D Elevation of proposed top of structure
D Existing left and right banks
D Design riverbed (for dredging only)
D Existing riverbed/channel bed
D Natural Ground Line (NGL)
D Seabed (for coastal projects)
E. Detailed Cross Sections (100m interval)
Veri1)rif the following are indicated:

D Stationing/Limits

D.O. No.~, series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 12 of 26
o Side slopejs
o Existing left and right banks
o Existing riverbed
o Seabed (for coastal projects)
o Proposedand existing structures
F. Structures
G. Others

D.O. No. ~ series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 13 of 26
ANNEX "81"
CHECKLIST FOR
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN
(HIGHWAYS)
D.O. No . .3Q., series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 14 of 26
I. List of Drawings for Conceptual Design Plan (Highways)
D Coversheet
D Index of Drawings
D Location Plan and Vicinity Map
D General Notes
D Summary of Quantities (Lump Sum)
D Topographic Plan
D Typical Roadway Section
D Plan and Profile
D Detailed Cross-Sections (SOm interval)
D Detailed Drainage Cross-Sections
D Roadway Lighting Plans, if any
D Other Structures as may be necessary
II. Supporting Documents
D Geotechnical/Soil Materials Report (Soil Classification, Partial Boring Logs

and/or Assumptions)
D Hydrologic Analysis/Report
D Traffic Data/Study Report
D Test Pit/Auger Hole (SOOminterval)
D Design Analysis (assumed parameters should conform to the minimum
requirements/tolerance) :
D Pavement Design
D Drainage (hydrological analysis and hydraulic calculations)
D Slope protection works (slope stability and soil bearing capacity analyses)
D Embankment (stability and settlement analysis)
D Quantity Calculations for every item category (e.g., Earthworks, Surfacing,
Drainage and Slope Protection, Miscellaneous Structures, etc.)
Checklist for Conceptual Design Plan (Highways)

D.O. No. 3D, series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 15 of 26
A. Title Sheet
Verifjr if the following are indicated:

o Project Title;
o Project length and limits; cross check its veracity in the plan and profile;
o Signatories/recommending officials and completeness of their corresponding
signature
o Verify and check if the index of sheets/drawings are complete and in order.

o Location (province of city) of the project;
o Vicinity Map
D. General Information Sheets
o Verify and check if the general notes indicated are applicable to the project;
and
o Verify the reference of the specifications and special provisions.
E. Summary of Quantities (Approximate)
o Estimated quantities of all items of work involved
F. Topographic Plan
o Verify and check if the Implementing Office/Consultant conduct surveys in

accordance with the requirements of the DPWH-DGCS, Volume 2-8
Engineering Survey 2015 Edition; and
o Reflecting all the existing structures, reference stations, benchmarks, etc.
G. Typical Roadway Section

o Width of pavement and shoulder including widening due to superelevation;
o Type and thickness of pavement structures;
o Pavement and shoulder cross slopes including the rate of superelevation;
o Embankment and cut slope, widening, slope protection works, warping and
rounding;
o Road Right-of-Way limit;
o Pavement design parameters and assumptions; and
o Slope protection design parameters and assumptions.

D.O. No. 30 / series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 16 of 26
H. Plan and Profile Plan
VeritY if the following are indicated:

Plan
o Centerline, edge of pavement, shoulder edge and road right-of-way limits;
o Stations at the centerline (at every 100m interval);
o Drainage structures (existing and proposed) indicating the direction of flow
and the description/dimension of the structure;
o Locations and construction limits of intersecting roads;
o Contour lines with standard intervals (1m interval for flat sections and Sm
interval for mountainous sections);
o Elements of horizontal curves;
o North Arrow Indicator;
o Description, type, limits of slope protection works, and other roadside
facilities/structures (existing and proposed); and
o Matchline in every sheet.
Profile
o Gradient of finished grade and natural ground profiles, and elevations are
plotted at every SOm interval;
o Matchline in every sheet;
o Existing and proposed drainage structures (RCPC/RCBC) including its
descriptions;
o Profile of the proposed side drainage indicating its slope gradient; and
o Ordinary and maximum flood elevation for drainage structures including the
flooded areas/sections;
I. Detailed Cross-Sections (SOm interval)

o Embankment and cut slope (if appropriate for the type of soil materials
requirement e.g., rocks, rippable rocks, and common earth);
o Finished grade and natural ground elevations templated at every SOm interval
o If templating of cross-sections is consistent with the standard typical roadway
section including the requirements for superelevation and widening;
o Area of cut and fill are indicated, including other relevant items of work
involved; and
o Necessity and appropriateness of the existing and proposed slope protection
works/structures.
J. Detailed Drainage Cross-Sections

o Templating of drainage structures at the proper invert elevations;
o Finished grade and natural ground elevations;
o Headwall and wingwall of drainage structure;
o Scour protection are provided as needed
o Quantity of different items of work involved

D.O. No.3Q., series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 17 of 26
K. Roadway Lighting Plans (if applicable)
D General Notes and/or Specifications;

D Legends and Symbols;
D Plans of Streetlights;
D Plans for Pedestrian Overpasses/Underpasses Lighting;
D Plans for Lighting Protections;
D One Line and Schematic Diagrams; and
D Other Details
L. Structures
D Indicate all the proposed structures.
M. Others
D Indicate all other requirements as specified in the Terms of Reference.

D.O. No. 3'0 • series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 18 of 26
ANNEX "82"
CHECKLIST FOR
(BRIDGES)
D.O. No. ~, series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of "Engineering Plan
Page 19 of 26
I. List of Drawings for Conceptual Design Plan (Bridges)
o Title Sheet
o Index of Drawings
o General Notes
o Summary of Quantities (Lump Sum)
o Topographic Plan (showing bridge alignment)
o Boring Data and Borehole Location
o General Plan and Elevation
o Typical Section of Superstructure
o Typical Section of Abutment
o Typical Section of Pier
o Construction Procedure, if necessary
o Feasibility Study Report

o GeotechnicalInvestigation Report including borehole location plan, boring logs
and laboratory test results (at every proposed location of abutment and pier
foundation)
o Hydrologic Analysis/ Report
o Hydraulic Analysis / Report
o Philippine Coast Guard Navigational Clearance (horizontal and vertical), if
applicable
o Design Analyses
o Structural Design and Analysis
o SeismicAnalysis
o Foundation Design and Analysis
o Quantity Calculationsfor every item category (e.g. Bridge Construction, etc.)
III. Checklist for Conceptual Design Plan (Bridges)
A. Title Sheet

o Project Title;
o Project length (showing beginning and end stations);
o Name and signature of approving and recommending officials.
o Index of drawings with sheets in correct order

o Location (province / city) of the project; and
o Vicinity Map (showing project location).
Checklist for Conceptual Design Plan (Bridges)

D.O. No. 3() • series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation ot"Engineering Plan
Page 20 of 26
D. General Notes
D Design Codes and Specifications;

D Design Loadings; and
D Material Specifications.
E. Topographic Plan
D Project area plotted with grid coordinate system;

D Plan/baseline map indicating the North Arrow direction, Azimuth, distance and
stationing, existing natural and man-made structures, contour lines with labels;
D Reference points and Elements of Curve;
D Established concrete monument: Global Positioning System (GPS), Benchmarks
(BMs), and Intermediate Benchmarks (IBMs);
D Water line elevation; and
D Borehole location.
F. Boring Data and Borehole Location Plan
D Borehole Location Plan;

D Boring Logs with corresponding n-values, description and soil classification;
and
D Elevation and stationings of SPT.
G. General Plan and Elevation
Veriljt if the following are indicated:

D Bridge Type;
D Span Lengths and Total Bridge Length;
D Stationings (Piers, Back of Backwalls);
D Ground Profile showing the elevation of ordinary water level (OWL) and design
flood level (DFL at Qso or maximum experienced flood level (MEFL), whichever
is greater);
D Type of foundation (dimensions and arrangement of piles);
D Hydraulic data (Catchment Area, Discharge, Velocity); and
D Clear roadway and sidewalk width.
H. Typical Sections of Superstructure

D Plan and Elevation (including sidewalk, railing and rail post) showing
dimensions;
D Typical roadway cross section showing sidewalk, railing and rail post; and
D Typical superstructure section showing dimensions.
I. Typical Sections of Abutment

D Plan, Front and Side Elevations showing dimensions;
D Section showing backwall, wingwall, coping, shaft and footing dimensions; and

D.O. No. 31> , series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of "Engineering Plan
Page 21 of 26
and locations.
J. Typical Sections of Pier

o Section showing coping, column and footing dimensions; and
and locations.
K. Structures
L. Others

D.O. No. .3O, series of 2020: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 22 of 26
ANNEX "B3"
CHECKLIST FOR
(WATER ENGINEERING PROJECTS)
D.O. No. ~O , series of 2019: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 23 of 26
I. List of Drawings for Conceptual Design Plan (Water Engineering

Projects)
o Cover Sheet
o Index of Drawings
o General Notes/Legends,Abbreviations & Symbols
o Summary of Quantities
o Topographic Plan
o Soil Boring Logs
o General Layout Plan
o Typical CrossSection
o Plan and Profile
o Detailed Cross Sections (100m interval)
o Details
o Hydrographic Survey Plan

o River Cross Sections
o River Profile
o Bathymetric survey (for coastal projects)
o Geotechnical/Soil Materials Report
o A minimum of two (2) exploration points every kilometer with maximum
spacing of SOOm
o Design Analysis (assumed parameters, should conform to the minimum
requirements/tolerance)
o Hydrologic Analysis
o Hydraulic Analysis (Water Surface Profile)
o Slope Stability Analysis
o Oceanographicand Hydrodynamic Analysis (for coastal project)
o Quantity Calculations for every ~tem category (e.g., Structure Excavation,
Embankment, Concrete Slope protection, etc.)
III. Checklist for Conceptual Design Plan (Water Engineering Projects)
A. Cover Sheet

o Letter head/logo of Proponent Office
o Name and location of Project
o Name and signatures of officials with designation who prepared/submitted,
recommended and approved plans
o For project prepared by consultants-includesthe standard format for the
waiver of responsibility
o Verify and check if the index of sheets/drawings are complete and in order
Checklist for Conceptual Design Plan (Water Engineering Projects)

D.O. No.~{) , series of 2019: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 24 of 26
c. Location Plan/Vicinity Map
Verifjl if the fol/owing are indicated:

o Location (province/city of the project);
o Vicinity Map
D. General Information Sheets
Verifjl if the following are indicated:

o Codesand References
o Hydraulic Parameters (return period, drainage area, discharge, velocity)
o Civil and Structural
o Legends/symbolsand abbreviations
E. Summary of Quantities (Approximate)
o Estimated quantities of all items of work involved
F. Topographic Plan
o Stationing/Limits
o Direction of flow
o Centerline
o Location, description and elevation of benchmarks
o Easement Zone
G. Soil Boring Logs

o Elevation and Stationing of SPT
oN-Values
o Description and Soil Classification
H. General Layout Plan

o Stationing/Limits (beginning to end of project)
o Location of boreholes
o Direction of flow
o Centerline
o Easement Zone

D.O. No.3Q, series of 2019: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 25 of 26
I, Typical Cross Section
o Ordinary Water Level (OWL)

o Design Flood Level (DFL)
o Mean Sea Level (MSL) }
o Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) .
o Mean Higher High Water Level (MHHW) For coastal projects
o Design High Water Level (DHWL)
o Freeboard Clearance
o Type of Structure
o Side slope/s
o Type of embankment material and degree of compaction
J, Plan and Profile
Plan
o Alignment
o Stationing/Limits
o Location of boreholes
o Direction of flow
o Centerline
o Azimuths, Distances, and PI No. and check the orientation of the azimuth and
accuracy of distances between PI's.
o Elements of horizontal curves including its limit
o Easement Zone
o Matchline/s
Profile
o Stationing/Limits
o Elevation of proposed top of structure/berm
o Elevation at the top of cut-off wall/pile cap at the foot of revetment
o Design riverbed (for dredging only)
o Existing riverbed/channel bed
o Invert elevations for drainage structures
o Drainage slope
o Natural Ground Line (NGL)

D.O. No.~ series of 2019: Guidelines and Checklists of Requirements in the Preparation of Engineering Plan
Page 26 of 26
K. Detailed Cross Sections (100m interval)
Veri,y if the following are indicated:

o Stationing/Limits
o Side slope/s
o X and Y coordinates and required dimensions
o Elevation of proposed top of structure/berm
o Existing riverbed
o Tabulated quantity of Items of Works involved
L. Details
Veri,y if the following are indicated:

o End Protection Works
o Slope Protection Works
o Scour Protection
o Foot Protection
M. Structures
N. Others

D.O. No. _____, Series of 2020
Revised Construction Safety Guidelines for the Implementation of
Infrastructure Projects During the COVID-19 Public Health Crisis,
Repealing Department Order No. 35, Series of 2020
Page 2 of 6
4. Sewerage projects, water service facilities projects, and digital works;

5. Priority public infrastructure projects; and
6. Priority private infrastructure projects defined as those that refer to food
production, agriculture, fisheries, energy, housing, communication, water
utilities, manufacturing, and business process outsourcing (BPO).
B. Areas under Modified Enhanced Community Quarantine (MECQ)
In addition to those allowed construction projects enumerated under Section A hereof,

other essential and priority projects shall be allowed to operate subject to strict compliance
with the herein Revised Construction Safety Guidelines; provided, however, that small-
scale projects shall not be allowed.
Small-scale projects are defined as those construction projects which are intended for
private and personal use, and because of scale, would not be able to or would impractically
be unable to comply with the herein Revised Construction Safety Guidelines in areas under
ECQ, MECQ, GCQ, and MGCQ.
C. Areas under General Community Quarantine (GCQ) or Modified General

Community Quarantine (MGCQ)
All public and private construction projects shall be allowed, subject to strict compliance
with the herein Revised Construction Safety Guidelines.
III. REVISED CONSTRUCTION SAFETY GUIDELINES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION

OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS DURING THE COVID-19 PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS
A. Prior to Deployment
1. Any person below twenty-one (21) years old, those who are sixty (60) years old and
above, those with immune deficiencies, comorbidities, or other health risks, and pregnant
women, including those who reside with the aforementioned, shall not be part of the
workforce for construction projects except as may be allowed under the Revised Omnibus
Guidelines issued by the IATF.
2. Construction personnel shall undergo quarantine for fourteen (14) days prior to
deployment; or in the alternative, the employee may undergo any available Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) - approved COVID-19 test, as may be prescribed by the
Department of Health (DOH), and be retested as the need arises. In this regard,
consultation with medical doctors (duly accredited by DOH, if possible) prior to the conduct
of COVID-19 test shall be made. Further, COVID-19 test procedures and return-to-work
policies of the contractors should comply with DOH Circular No. 2020-0160 dated 31 March
2020, Department Memorandum No. 2020-0220 dated 11 May 2020, and other pertinent
issuances of the DOH on the matter.
Page 3 of 6
3. The concessionaires, contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers shall provide for their
personnel/workers the necessary welfare facilities and amenities, such as employees’
quarters for board and lodging, ensuring compliance with social distancing, proper
hygiene, etc.
4. Concessionaires, contractors, and subcontractors shall ensure that their projects are in
compliance with DOLE D.O. No. 13, Series of 1998, and the DTI and DOLE Interim
Guidelines on Workplace Prevention and Control of COVID-19. Contractors shall provide
their personnel and workers continuous supply of vitamins, particularly vitamin C, other
over-the-counter medicines, quarantine facilities, and oxygen tanks for emergency
purposes.
5. Concessionaires, contractors, and subcontractors shall provide disinfection facilities at

their respective project sites in compliance with pertinent DOH and IATF Guidelines, to be
placed at strategic locations to ensure the safety and welfare of all personnel.
6. Proper information dissemination regarding COVID-19 construction protocols, on top of

existing construction safety practices, shall be conducted by Safety Officers to all
personnel.
B. During Deployment
1. Conduct an inventory of works for the construction sequencing to be followed and

undertaken to uphold the required social distancing. Break times shall be conducted in a
staggered manner.
2. Employees shall be housed in their respective quarters for the entire duration of the
project covered by the ECQ, MECQ, GCQ, and MGCQ. In case there is a need to leave the
said quarters during the project duration, “Prior to Deployment” procedures shall be
conducted at every instance of re-entry.
3. Errands to be conducted outside the construction site premises shall be kept to a

minimum. Number of personnel running errands shall be limited and shall be properly
disinfected and closely monitored for symptoms within fourteen (14) days upon re-entry.
4. Field offices, employees’ quarters, and other common areas shall be regularly maintained,
including the daily disinfection of such facilities.
5. Adequate food, safe/potable drinking water, disinfectants, and hand soaps shall be made
available by the concessionaires, contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers to their in-
house personnel.
6. Daily monitoring of the pre and post-work health conditions of workers shall be undertaken
by the concessionaires, contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers, including but not
limited to temperature, health, and exposure monitoring, as preventive measures.
Personnel with manifestations or symptoms relative to COVID-19 shall be immediately
Page 4 of 6
isolated and quarantined for fourteen (14) days and if necessary, brought to the nearest
DOH COVID-19 treatment facility under strict confidentiality and privacy. Proper protocols
in accordance with the DTI and DOLE Interim Guidelines on Workplace Prevention and
Control of COVID-19 shall likewise be strictly observed.
7. Work activities shall be strictly monitored daily by the Safety Officer on site to ensure
compliance with safety standards and quarantine protocols.
8. There shall be a full-time Safety Engineer/Officer assigned at the site who shall strictly
monitor work activities. Said Safety Engineer/Officer shall ensure strict compliance with
DOLE D.O. No. 13, Series of 1998 and the DTI and DOLE Interim Guidelines on Workplace
Prevention and Control of COVID-19 with regard to the wearing of additional personal
protective equipment (PPE) required such as, but not limited to, face masks, safety
glasses/goggles, face shields, and long sleeve T-shirts, and other measures to contain the
spread of COVID-19 in the workplace, as provided in these Guidelines.
9. For off-site employees’ quarters, transport service, duly disinfected before and after use,
shall be provided, and social distancing shall likewise be observed therein at all times in
accordance with DOTr guidelines.
10. Sharing of construction and office equipment is discouraged. However, if necessary, the
shared equipment must be disinfected in between transfers amongst personnel.
11. All material and equipment delivery and disposal shall be conducted by a specific team of
personnel on an isolated loading/unloading zone while limiting contact with the
delivery/disposal personnel. All material and/or equipment entering the construction site
shall be duly disinfected as much as possible.
12. Non-essential personnel, visitors, and the general public shall be restricted to enter the
construction site, employees’ quarters, and field offices. Otherwise, all personnel entering
the construction site premises on a temporary basis (e.g. delivery truck drivers, inspectors,
etc.) shall be properly logged and checked for symptoms. Gatherings, liquors, and/or
merry-making are strictly prohibited within the construction site premises.
13. Clustered and staggered deployment of employees within the construction site shall be
observed to minimize personnel contact and for easier contact tracing.
14. Proper waste disposal shall be provided for infectious waste such as PPEs and other waste
products coming from outside the construction premises.
IV. MONITORING and ENFORCEMENT:
A. For DPWH infrastructure projects, the head of the concerned DPWH Implementing Office
(IO) shall monitor compliance with these Guidelines and issue construction quarantine
pass (QP) to the individual qualified personnel of the concessionaires, contractors,
subcontractors, and suppliers based on the list submitted and certified by the said
Page 5 of 6
concessionaires, contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers, clearly stating the

identification, designation, nature of work, validity, and destination (A copy of the QP form
is attached hereto as Annex “A”). It is understood that the QP referred in these
Guidelines shall cover transit of personnel from (a) MGCQ, GCQ, MECQ area to ECQ area,
and vice versa, and (b) an area not under community quarantine to a MGCQ, GCQ, MECQ,
ECQ area, and vice versa.
B. For LGU implemented projects and private construction projects, the LGU concerned,
through its City/Municipal Engineering Office, shall monitor compliance with these
Guidelines and shall issue QPs to the individual qualified personnel of the concessionaires,
contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers based on the list submitted and certified by the
said concessionaires, contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers.
C. For infrastructure projects implemented by other national government agencies,

Government-Owned and Controlled Corporations (GOCC), and other government
instrumentalities, the head or representative of the agency, GOCC, or government
instrumentality concerned shall monitor compliance with these Guidelines and issue QPs
to the individual qualified personnel of the concessionaires, contractors, subcontractors,
and suppliers based on the list submitted and certified by the said concessionaires,
contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers.
D. For monitoring purposes, personal records and health report of all personnel necessary
for contact tracing shall be submitted by the concessionaires, contractors, subcontractors,
and suppliers to the DPWH IO, LGU, or Implementing Government Agency,
Instrumentality or GOCC, as the case may be, and shall be resubmitted and updated
monthly, or as the need arises (Copies of the monitoring forms are attached hereto as
Annexes “B” and “C”).
E. Concessionaires, contractors, and subcontractors shall submit the design for disinfection
facilities and amenities, for monitoring purposes, to the DPWH IO, LGU, or Implementing
Government Agency, Instrumentality or GOCC, as the case may be, as mentioned in
Section III (A) (5).
F. Concessionaires, contractors, and subcontractors shall submit to the DPWH IO, LGU, or
Implementing Government Agency, Instrumentality or GOCC, as the case may be, a
certification under oath that they have complied and shall continue to comply with the
provisions of these Guidelines within fifteen (15) days from commencement of work (A
copy of the certification is attached hereto as Annex “D”).
F. The allowed government and private construction projects are subject to the visitorial and
enforcement powers of the Department of Labor and Employment and the Department of
Trade and Industry in order to ensure compliance with the provisions on maximum
allowable operational capacity in establishments as well as minimum health standards and
protocols in accordance with Section 8 (4) of the Revised Omnibus Guidelines.
Page 6 of 6
V. PENALTIES
Violation of any provision of this Revised Construction Safety Guidelines shall be subject to the
following penalties, without prejudice to the imposition of additional administrative sanctions as
the internal rules of DPWH may provide and/or further criminal action that may be filed against
such erring concessionaires, contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers, as may be provided by
applicable laws:
A. Termination of contract for breach thereof resulting to default pursuant to Item III (A)
(2) (c) (i), Annex I of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 9184
in relation to Section 37.2.3 of the same, which provides that bidding documents requiring
bidders to know and be familiar with all existing laws, decrees, ordinances, acts, and
regulations, including the Department Orders of DPWH, shall form part of the contract
awarded, and refusal or failure to comply with the valid instruction of DPWH, as the
procuring entity, shall justify the contract’s termination;
B. Contract termination/rescission under Section 12.21 (b) of the Implementing Rules and
Regulations of Republic Act No. 6957, as amended by Republic Act No. 7718 (BOT Law);
C. Referral to the Philippine Contractors Accreditation Board of any such violation by the
contractor/subcontractor, which shall constitute as prima facie case of construction
malperformance of grave consequence due to negligence, incompetence, or malpractice
contemplated under DOLE D.O. No. 13, Series of 1998 and DPWH D.O. No. 56, Series of
2005 in relation to Republic Act No. 4566 (Contractors’ License Law); and
D. Institution of criminal action under Republic Act No. 11469 (Bayanihan to Heal as One
Act).
VI. EFFECTIVITY
These Guidelines shall take effect immediately upon publication in the Official Gazette or any
newspaper of general circulation.
This Order hereby repeals D.O. No. 35, Series of 2020, and Annex 1 thereof.
For information and guidance.
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary
1.1 SCT/RGVS/MIV/ESR
(ANNEX "B")
<IMPLEMENTING OFFICE>
<ADDRESS>
Name of Project :
Location:
General Contractor:
Sub-Contractor :
WORKER'S RECORD LOG
Had any
Location of Origin Prior to Site Mode of COVID-19
No. Name Age Sex Address Contact No. Signature
Deployment Transportation SYMPTOMS
(Y/N)
(Annex “C”)

<IMPLEMENTING OFFICE>
<Address>
DAILY COVID-19 SURVEILLANCE FILL-UP/CHECKLIST FORM
Pangalan: Petsa:
Edad: Kasarian: Telepono:
Lugar ng Tirahan: Trabaho:
Lugar ng Trabaho:
Kontraktor:
FEVER RESPIRATORY INFECTION
≥380C Presensya ng mga sumusunod (Presence of the following):
____ Ubo (Cough) (productive or non-productive cough

____ Igsi ng paghinga (Shortness of breath)
____ Oo (Yes) ____ Sipon (Colds)
____ Namamagang lalamunan (Sore throat)
____ Hindi (No) ____ Tumutulong sipon (Runny Nose)
____ Naninikip na ilong (Nasal Congestion)
____ Nananakit na kalamnan (Muscle Pains)
____ Sakit ng ulo (Headache)
____ Hirap sa paghinga (Difficulty of Breathing)
____ Pagtatae (Diarrhea)
____ Pagkawala ng pang-amoy (Loss of Sense of Smell)
____ Pagkawala ng panlasa (Loss of Sense of Taste)
____ WALA (NONE)
Kung mayroong presenya ng mga nasa taas, simula kailan. (If

identified with presence of the above, since when)?
_________________________
Pagpapahayag: Ang mga impormasyon na aking ibinigay dito ay totoo, tama at kumpleto.
Aking na-iintindihan na ang hindi pagsagot sa mga katanungan o ang maling sagot ay
maaaring may seryosong kinahihinatnan. (Article 171, & 172 of the Revised Penal Code of
the Philippines and Republic Act No. 11332.)
_______________________________________
PIRMA SA TAAS NG NAKALIMBAG NA PANGALAN
Annex “D”
Department Order No. ____
Series of 2020
CERTIFICATION AND UNDERTAKING
Pursuant to DPWH Department Order No. ____, Series of 2020 (DO No. ___, s2020),
the undersigned, (name and position)_ of (name of company and address) ,
contractor of (name of office/s, name of project/s and project/s details) , duly
authorized to act for and in behalf of the said company (as evidenced by Board
Resolution/Secretary’s Certificate/Special Power of Attorney, dated __________________,
and attached hereto), hereby:
1. Attest that, in relation to our abovementioned project(s), our company has

duly complied with all the requirements for the
commencement/resumption/continuation of the operations/activities
thereof during the COVID-19 Public Health Crisis, as set forth in DO No. ___,
s2020; and
2. Undertake to:
a) Ensure strict and continued compliance with DO No. ___, s2020 and
any DPWH issuances that may be issued in the future, in relation to
the implementation of infrastructure projects during the COVID-19
Public Health Crisis Community Quarantine;
b) Allow and fully cooperate with the DPWH and other monitoring
agencies’ mentioned in the DPWH Revised Construction Safety
Guidelines for the initial and regular inspection, and the monitoring of
our abovementioned office/s and project/s, pursuant to DO No. ___,
s2020; and
c) Regularly submit (at the end of each month, beginning on the month
following the resumption of operations/activities of our company’s
abovementioned office/s and project/s) to the DPWH and other
monitoring agencies’ mentioned in the DPWH Revised Construction
Safety Guidelines concerned electronically (or through courier service
or by personal service, if the former mode is not available/feasible or
timely, and such DPWH Office concerned is not under ECQ), proof of
our continued compliance with the existing or subsequently-issued
requirements of the DPWH relative to the COVID-19 Public Health
Crisis Community Quarantine, in the form of scanned, certified
documents, photos, or videos, as part of the regular monitoring and
post-audit process.
Annex “D”
Department Order No. ____
Series of 2020
Name of Company
Address
Contact Details
By:
(Signature)
Name
Position/Designation
Date
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this __________ day of __________ 2020, affiant
exhibiting to me his/her competent evidence of identity/valid government
ID/Passport No. ____________________ issued on _________________ at _________________.
Doc. No: _____;

Page No. _____;
Book No. _____;
Series of 2020.
Manila
2 9 MAY 2020
DEPARTMENTORDER ) SUBJECT APPROVAL OF WORK SUSPENSION
ORDER, WORK RESUMPTION
NO.
42 l
)
ORDER, AND CONTRACT TIME
EXTENSION FOR CIVIL WORKS
Series of 2020 f}IJ/ or..o 1: 10.,.0 PROJECTS
In view of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need to streamline the processes of this
Department and afford authority and accountability to the Implementing Offices to act on
matters relating work suspension, resumption and contract time extension. This will not only
reduce logistics challenges brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic when it comes to
requests for suspension, resumption and contract time extension, it will also strengthen the
accountability of Implementing Offices in ensuring that infrastructure projects are effectively
and efficiently implemented to contribute to the country's economic growth and people's
livelihood. Hence, the gUidelines and procedures set forth in D.O. 144, series of 2016 is
hereby amended as follows:
I. LEGALBASIS
• Annex "E" of the RevisedImplementing Rulesand Regulations (IRR) of RepubliCAct

(RA) No. 9184 for locally funded projects,
• Federation International des Ingenieurs-Conseils (FIDIC), General Conditions of

Contract and Conditions of Particular Application, or any other gUidelinesfor foreign
assisted projects
II. DEFINITION OFTERMS
• Contract Time Extension (CTE) - is a written authority, issued by the DPWH

Project Engineer and approved by the duly authorized DPWHofficials, prior to the
contract expiration, granting the contractor additional time beyond the approved
completion date in order to carry out remaining works or any additional works, on
account of other special circumstancesthat warrant such additional contract time.
• Work Suspension Order (WSO) - is a written order to the contractor issued

by the DPWH Project Engineer/Engineer's Representativeand approved by the duly
authorized DPWH officials to suspend the contract work wholly or partly for such
period as may be deemed necessary,for grounds proVidedunder V(A) hereof.
• Work Resumption Order (WRO) - is a written order issued by the DPWHProject

r- __ : ••./r- __ : ~I_ I'\ __ •• .&._.L: •• -I •...
_. #_..J t.... •• .L.1- •• __ ..J 11 __ -1 _& .L.t...._ TI'""\
CI'Y"It::t::11 CI'Y"It::t::1 :;, Kt::1J1 t:::;,t::IILClLlVt:: C1IIU CIIJIJI uvt::u uy Lilt:: L.UIIL.t::IIIt::U nt::C1u UI Lilt:: lU
to the contractor to resume construction operation covered by a previous Work
DEPARTMENT ORDER NO. ~ SERIES 2020
APPROVAL OF WORK SUSPENSION ORDER, WORK RESUMPTION ORDER,
AND CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION FOR CIVIL WORKS PROJECTS
Page 2 of 9
Suspension Order, after the cause of or reason for the work suspension has been
resolved.
III. DELEGATEDAUTHORITY
The authority to issue Work Suspension Order (WSO), Work Resumption Order (WRO)
and Contract Time Extension (CTE), including the determination of the inclusive period
necessary for the said Orders pursuant to Sections 10.1 and 10.5 of the 2016 Revised
Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 9184, is hereby delegated as
follows
A. For locally funded projects:
Approving Official Cumulative Inclusive Period
District Engineer - up to 60 calendar days (cd)
Regional Director - Beyond 60 cd
B. For Centrall UPMO projects:
Approving Official Cumulative Inclusive Period
UPMO Cluster Director/Bureau Director - up to 120 cd
Undersecretary for Technical Services/ - beyond 120 cd

UPMO Operations
The' above-stated officials shall issue the corresponding Orders within the time
prescribed in the DoTS.
IV. DUTY OF THE PROJECTENGINEER
The preparation of the desired WSO, WRO and CTE shall remain with the
concerned DPWH Project Engineer. The DPWH Project Engineer shall ensure that
all supporting documents are submitted pursuant to the prevailing Department
Order for DoTS. Likewise, all approved CTEs shall be submitted to the Bureau of
Construction for updating of construction schedule in the PCMA.
The DPWH Project Engineer shall use the format prescribed in Annexes A, B, C
and E hereof in preparing said WSO, WRO and CTE, as may be deemed
applicable.
DEPARTMENT ORDER NO. --!l1.-., SERIES 2020
Page 3 of 9
V. WORK SUSPENSIONORDER
A. Grounds
1. For locally-funded projects, a WSO directing the contractor to suspend the

contract work wholly or partly, for such period as may be necessary, shall be
issued for the following reasons:
a. Force majeure or any fortuitous event that has taken place, which inflicts
extensive damage and/or makes it difficult to proceed with the work, such
as a devastating earthquake or flood, or
b. Failure on the part of the contractor to correct bad conditions which are
unsafe for workers or for the general public, or
c. Failure of the contractor to carry out valid orders given by the procuring
entity or to perform any provisions of the contract, or
d. Adjustment of plans to suit field conditions as found necessary during

construction, or
e. There exist right-of-way (ROW) problems which prohibit the contractor

from performing works in accordance with the approved construction
schedule, or
f. Peace and order condition which makes it extremely dangerous, if not

impossible to work, as certified in writing by the Philippine National Police
(PNP) Station Commander which has responsibility over the affected area,
and confirmed by the Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG)
Regional Director, or
g. The Government initiates major variations in the scope of the contract

during its implementation to suit changes in physical and economic
conditions, or
h. Other particular circumstances enumerated in the applicable clause of the

contract, and such other conditions provided under item 9 Annex "E" of the
2016 Revised IRR of RA 9184.
The DPWH shall not issue a WSO if the interruption is due to

intermittent conditions which renders the site unworkable, such in
case of unfavorable weather condition (Rainy), weather disturbances
or its effect (river swelling, storm surge, etc.). Instead, a Monthly Time
Suspension Report (MTSR) shall be issued indicating the said unworkable days
and granting a contract time extension as provided in item V(C) hereof.
Considering that a certificate of site availability was issued by the 10 prior to

the start of the project, WSO due to ROW problem shall not be issued right at
the start of contract effectivity.
DEPARTMENT ORDER NO. L SERIES 2020
Page 4 of 9
2. For foreign-assisted projects, a WSO may be issued by the 10 directing the

contractor concerned to suspend the work wholly or partly under the contract, for
any applicable reason/legal basis in accordance with FIDIC, General Conditions of
Contract and Conditions of Particular Application, or any other applicable guidelines
prescribed by the lending institution.
B. Suspension of Work Initiated by the Contractor
If the Suspension of Work is initiated by the Contractor for reasons stated in item
9.2 Annex "E" of the Revised IRR of RA 9184, the contractor or his duly authorized
representative shall have the right to suspend the operation on any/or all project or
activities along the critical path of activities after 15 calendar days from the date of
receipt of the written notice from the contractor to the implementing office. Upon
receipt of the notice, the DPWH Project Engineer shall immediately investigate the
validity of the said suspension. The concerned 10 shall act immediately to resolve
the cause of suspension.
C. Monthly Time Suspension Report (MTSR)
A MTSR shall be issued instead of a WSO if suspension/unworkable days is due to

unfavorable weather condition (Rainy), weather disturbances or its effect (river
swelling, storm surge, etc.), or other conditions rendering the site unworkable occur
intermittently.
The MTSR shall indicate the said unworkable days and grant contract time
extension upon approval by the Head of the 10, provided that proper and complete
documentation is compliant with the checklist in the DoTS for Civil Works.
The DPWH Project Engineer/ Engineer's Representative shall prepare the MTSR,
using the format in Annex 0, for ~pproval by the Head of the 10. MTSR for the
current month should be prepared and approved in the succeeding month. The
Project Logbook, Weather Chart and Geotagged pictures should be attached in the
approval of MTSR in order to verify the workable and unworkable days.
Unworkable days due to unfavorable weather condition, other weather disturbances

or its effect, as reflected in the MTSR, shall not be included in determining the
cumulative number of days that the project was suspended with regard to the limits
of authority in item III hereof.
(For example, in the following straight line diagram (Example-i), the designation for
the work suspension order due to obstruction should be WSO No. 2 even though it
succeeded the unworkable intermittent period due to rainy/unworkable days. In
Example-i, WSO NO.2 (due to obstruction) shall be approved by the District
Engineer.)
DEPARTMENT ORDER NO. -.!:lL SERIES 2020
APPROVALOF WORK SUSPENSION ORDER, WORK RESUMPTION ORDER,
Page 5 of 9
Example - 1
ReVIsed E>;)Iry
per approved
Revised E>piry en: No. 2 dJe
p'" approved CTE to intermttent
No. 1 dJe to cnf avor able
WSOIWRO No.1 weather
May June July August September October Nov.
MTSR ReVIsed
(intermittent E>p'ry per
unfavorable weather approved
condition): 30 cd (To en: No.3

d.Je to
be approved by the WSO/WRO
DE) To be To be No.2
To be issued by issued by
approved DEO, for DEO, for
by the DE approval approval of
Note: In case of the DE DE
unfavorable weather
condition, issuance of a
Work Suspension Order
is NOT necessary
Note: For illustration purposes, 1 month = 30 cd and the Implementing Office is a District Engineering Office (DEO).
D. Continuance of Work SuspensionOrder (CWSO)
For locally funded projects, if the reason for the suspension was not resolved within
the period provided in the WSO, the herein delegated authority shall issue, within 5
days before the lapsed of the WSO, a CWSO directing the continuance of the
suspension of work under the contract
The authority of the District Engineer and UPMO Project Director/ Bureau Director in
issuing a CWSO shall take into consideration the number of days provided in the
WSO. In case the cumulative number of days provided in both WSO and CWSO
exceed their authority provided in item III hereof, the CWSO must be approved by
the Regional Director or the Undersecretary for UPMO Operations/ Technical
Services, as the case may be.
VI. WORK RESUMPTION ORDER
Upon the resolution of the cause or reason for the issuance of WSO or CWSO, the DPWH
Project Engineer, even without a request from the contractor, shall prepare a WRO - using
the format in Annexes B-1 to B-3 (Locally funded projects) and Annex B-4 (Foreign
funded projects) hereof, whichever is applicable - directing the contractor to resume work
under the contract, subject to the approval of the Head of the Implementing Office, and to
the requirements of the DoTS for Civil Works checklist and prescribed timeframe.
Page 6 of 9
VII. CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION (CTE)
A. Application
1. A corresponding CTE shall be granted only if it is in accordance with the

provisions of Section 10 Annex E of the Revised IRR of RA 9184 / FIOIC /
Conditions of Contract or any other applicable guidelines, with complete
documentary requirements in accordance with the checklist of the DoTS for Civil
Works. It has to be approved by the duly delegated DPWH official in view of the
approved work suspension order or its continuance, subject to evaluation,
among others, to consider utilization/exhaustion of predetermined unworkable
days, bond extension, quit claim for damages, and their effect on the approved
PERT/CPM/PDM Network Diagram schedule in order to reflect the official
revised contract time and expiry date as a result of such work suspension order
or its continuance.
2. The issuance of a WSO/CWSO is not an automatic basis for contract

time extension. The expiry date shall only be revised if the Contract
Time Extension has been duly approved by the authorized officials.
3. In designating the CTE due to approved WSO, Monthly Time Suspension Report
due to intermittent rainy/unworkable days and other reasons, the numbering
shall be made in a consecutive order (Refer to Example 2).
Example 2
Note: The Implementing Office is a District Engineering Office (DEO).
I CTENo.1. I
~
Rev ised
Expiry
Date
(R ED.) R.E.D.
due to due to RE.D.
WSO& WSO& due to
Original Expiry Date WRO WRO MTSR
May 31 No.1 No. 2 (20 cd)
30 cd 30 cd 30 cd 20 cd
March April May June July August September
30 cd
WSO No.2 Monthly
June 1 Time
Suspension
VO No.1 WRO No.2 Report
approved on July 1 (MTSR)
May 8 (with 30 unworkable:
cd additional (20 cd)
contract
duration)
4. The CTE corresponding to the WSO may be approved by the official with whom
the authority has been delegated even prior the issuance of WRO, provided
that the CWSO has been approved. The WRO shall be issued by the
Page 7 of 9
implementing office, regardless of the cumulative period of the WSO and

CWSO. (Refer to Example 3).
Example 3
Note: The Implementing Office is a District Engineering Office (DEO).
Original Expiry
CTE No. 1 may be issued by the

D.E. if CWSO No. l(a) is already
approved by the RD
February May
60 cd
For For For

approval of approval of approval of
DE RD DE
5. The 10 shall act on each claim for Contract lime Extension from contractors
including investigations of the circumstances and justifications, if any, and
disposition-Le., approval! disapproval! reduction/ modification/ recommendation
- within the prescribed time under the DoTS of each office, Section 10.1 Annex E
of the Revised IRR of RA 9184, Section 20.1 of FIOIC, Section 5.a of RA 6713
(within 15 calendar days), or any other applicable guidelines prescribed by the
lending institution (for foreign funded).
6. The Project Engineer shall prepare the prescribed form for Contract lime
Extension attached herewith as Annexes E-l to E-Sb as may be applicable.
B. Request for CTE
1. The request of the contractor for CTE should be in accordance with Section 10,
Annex E of the Revised IRR of R.A. 9184. It shall be made prior to the
expiration of the contract time. Requests made after the official expiry date
shall not be granted. During the implementation period, request for contract
time extension shall be made within thirty (30) calendar days for locally funded
projects, or within twenty-eight (28) cd for foreign funded projects, after work
operations has resumed or after the circumstances leading to such claim had
arisen. The contractor shall ensure that notices with prescribed supporting
documents were delivered and duly received by the implementing office within
the said period. Failure to comply shall constitute as a waiver of the contractor
to any claim for time extension pursuant to Section 10.1 Annex E of the
Revised IRR of RA 9184 and Section 20.1 of the FIOIe.
Page 8 of 9
2. The concerned Project Engineer shall issue a certification once the pre-
determined rainy/unworkable days are exhausted. Said certification shall be
attached in the processing of CTE. In case the contract has no pre-determined
rainy/unworkable calendar days, the Project Engineer shall issue a certification
stating that the contract has no pre-determined rainy/unworkable calendar
days to be attached in the processing of CTE together with the copy of Special
Conditions of Contract/Program of Works.
In the course of project implementation, rainy/unworkable days including work

activities for the day must be properly recorded and documented in the Project
Logbook, Project Weather Chart and Geotagged Pictures duly signed by the
DPWH Project Inspector and Project Engineer. Any excess in the number of
rainy/unworkable days pre-determined by the DPWH as indicated in the
contract may be subject to additional time extension for approval of the
concerned DPWH officials in accordance with their prescribed limits of
authority. No corresponding time extension shall be granted due to unfavorable
weather condition, if the same did not affect any critical activity.
3. The request for CTE shall be submitted to the approving official to be supported
with complete and proper documents in accordance with the checklist in DoTS
for Civil Works. Otherwise, the said request shall be denied.
C. Granting of Contract Time Extension
1. The 10 shall act on each claim for Contract Time Extension from contractors
including investigations of the circumstances and justifications, if any, and
disposition-Le., approval! disapproval! reduction/ modification/ recommendation
- within the prescribed time under the DoTS of each office, Section 10, Annex E
of the Revised IRR of RA 9184, Section 20.1 of FIDIC and Section 5.a of RA 6713
(within 15 calendar days).
2. A Variation Order (Extra Work/Change Order) with a corresponding additional

contract time due to additional quantities, change of methodology or change of
materials, should be approved by the concerned DPWH Official in accordance
with the limits of authority in approving Variation Order. Such additional
contract time due to Variation Orders shall not be covered under the limits of
authority as prescribed in Section 4.4.2 hereof and it should not also be
included in the numbering of contract time extensions due to WSO/MTSR. As
such, granting of contract time extension using the forms in Annex E-l to E-6
hereof is not necessary since the said additional contract time is already
reflected in the Variation Order Form. However, it shall be considered in
determining the revised contract duration.
Page 9 of 9
VIII. T1MEFRAME IN THE REVIEW/EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF THE DPWH

FOR WSO, CWSO, WRO, and CTE
1. All Offices concerned in the preparation, review, evaluation and approval of all
requests relative hereto, shall observe the timeframe stipulated in Annex F of this
issuance.
2. Any personnel/official of the DPWH who will take more than fifteen (15) days to
submit its recommendation or decision on any request covered under this order,
shall be held administratively liable.
Relative to the provisions of the D.O. on the Document Tracking System (DoTS), all request of
the contractor shall be duly registered in the DoTS and duly recorded in the Receiving Logbook
of the Implementing Office (Records Section/DoTS Center). Likewise, the letter request of the
contractor should be stamped with "Received" by the 10 indicating therein the date and time it
was received.
Failure of the concerned DPWH personnel to implement the provisions of this Order shall, after
due process, make them liable to the penalties prescribed for violation of reasonable office rules
and regulation in Rule 10, Schedule of Penalties of the Revised Rules on Administrative Cases in
the Civil Services dated December 2011.
Likewise, this Department Order will not in any way hinder the Bureau of Construction (BOC) to
inspect at random or regularly the issued WSO/CWSO/WRO and CTE granted by the IOs if it has
the reason to believe that this order is not followed.
This Order supersedes D.O. No. 144 Series of 2016 and D.O. 106 Series of 2018 and other
previous issuances to the contrary and shall take effect immediately.
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary
6.1.2. RMC/RAE/TCA/EAA/KSSR/ESR
Depatttrent of Public Works and Highways
III II " 111111111111111111111111111111

WINOW02154
10'S LETTERHEAD
Note: for WSO of up to 60 I Annex A-l
cd for DEO implemented
projects WORK SUSPENSION ORDER NO.
Name of Project
Location
Date
(Authorized Managing Officer)

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
You are hereby directed to suspend construction operations effective (date) due to (state
the reason of work suspension).
Hereunder is the historical data of your approved Work Suspension Order and Contract Time
Extension:
Approved Work
Contract Time, Approved Contract
Suspension Order,
Calendar Days Time Extension, CD
Calendar Days (CD) Days Used to Date:
cd
Original: _ WSO No. 1 - C.T.E. No.1 -
WSO No.2 - C.T.E. No.2 - Days Remaining:
Revised including WSO No.3 - C.T.E. No.3 - cd
approved CTE:
-- Total: -- Total: --
Please acknowledge receipt of this order by signing and returning three of the attached
copies. The fourth copy is for your file.
Project Engineer I/II/III
Recommending Approval: Approved:
Chief, Implementing Unit District Engineer
I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Order.
Date: _ CONTRACTOR'SAUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

Position
10'S LETTERHEAD
Note: for WSD of beyond Annex A-2
60 cd for DED
implemented projects WORK SUSPENSION ORDER NO.
Name of Project
Location
Date

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
Extension:
Approved Work
Suspension Order,
cd
Original: _ WSO No.1 - C.T.E. NO.1 -
WSO NO.2 - C.T.E. No.2 - Days Remaining:
approved CTE:
Project Engineer If II/III
District Engineer Regional Director

Position
IO'S LETTERHEAD
Note: for RO implemented Annex A-3
projects
WORK SUSPENSION ORDER NO.
Name of Project
Location
Date

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
Extension:
Approved Work
Suspension Order,
cd
Original: _ WSO No.1 - C.T.E. No.1 -
Revised including WSO No. 3 - C.T.E. No.3 - cd
approved CTE:
Chief, Implementing Unit Regional Director
Date: --- CONTRACTOR'SAUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

Position
Note: for WSO of CO
implemented projects up to IO'S LETTERHEAD
Annex A-4
120 cd with Construction
Supervision Consultant
Name of Project
Location
Date

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
Extension:
Approved Work
Suspension Order,
cd
Original: _ WSO No. 1 - C.T.E. No. 1 -
Revised including WSO NO.3 - C.T.E. No.3 - cd
approved CTE:
DPWH Project Engineer IjII/III Consultant's Project/Resident Engr.
Recommending Approval:
DPWH Project Manager Consultant's Project Manager
Approved:
Bureau/Project Director
Date: _ CONTRACTOR'S AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

Position
Note: for WSO of CO IO'S LETTERHEAD
Annex A-S
implemented projects up to
120 cd without Construction
Supervision Consultant WORK SUSPENSION ORDER NO.
Name of Project
Location
Date

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
Extension:
Approved Work
Suspension Order,
cd
WSO No. 2 - C.T.E. No.2 - Days Remaining:
approved CTE:
DPWH Project Engineer I/II/III
DPWH Project Manager Bureau/Project Director

Position
Note: for WSO of beyond
120 cd for CO implemented 10'S LETTERH EAD
I . Annex A-6 I
projects with Construction
Name of Project
Location
Date

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
Extension:
Approved Work
Suspension Order,
cd
Original: _ WSO No. 1 - C.T.E. NO.1 -
approved CTE:
DPWH Project Engineer I/II/III Consultant's Project/Resident Engr.
Bureau/Project Director Consultant's Project Manager
Approved:
Undersecretary for Operations

Position
Note: for WSO of beyond 120
cd for CO implemented IO'S LETTERH EAD
projects without Construction Annex A-7
Name of Project
Location
Date

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
Extension:
Approved Work
Suspension Order,
cd
WSO No. 2 - C.T.E. NO.2 - Days Remaining:
approved CTE:
DPWH Project Engineer I/II/III
Approved:

Position
IO'S LETTERH EAD
Note: for DED Annex B-1
implemented projects
WORK RESUMPTION ORDER NO.
Name of Project
Location
Date

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
You are hereby directed to resume construction operations at the project site effective
(date) in view of the (state the reason for the resumption of work e.g. resolved obstruction).
Extension:
Approved Work
Suspension Order,
cd
WSO No.2 - C.T.E. No.2 -
Days Remaining:
approved CTE:
Project Engineer IjII/III

Position
10'5 LETTERH EAD
Note: for RO implemented I Annex B-2
projects
Name of Project
Location
Date

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
Extension:
Approved Work
Suspension Order,
Calendar Davs (CD) Days Used to Date:
cd
Original: _ WSO No.1 - C.T.E. NO.1 -
Revised including WSO No.3 - C.T.E. No.3 cd
-
approved CTE:

Position
10'S LETTERHEAD
Note: for CO implemented Annex B-3
projects (locally funded)
Name of Project
Location
Date

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
Extension:
Approved Work
Suspension Order,
cd
WSO No. 2 - C.T.E. No.2 -
Days Remaining:
approved CTE:

Position
IO'S LETTERHEAD
Note: for CO implemented Annex B-4a
projects without consultant
(foreign funded) WORK RESUMPTION ORDER NO.
Name of Project
Location
Date

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
Extension:
Approved Work
Suspension Order,
cd
WSO NO.2 - C.T.E. NO.2 - Days Remaining:
Revised including WSO No.3 - C.T.E. No.3 cd
-
approved CTE:
DPWH Project Engineer IjII/III
DPWH Project Manager
Approved:

Position
IO'S LETTERHEAD
Note: for CO implemented Annex B-4b
projects with consultant
(foreign funded) WORK RESUMPTION ORDER NO.
Name of Project
Location
Date

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
Extension:
Approved Work
Suspension Order,
cd
Original: _ WSO No.1 - C.T.E. No. 1 -
Revised including WSO No. 3 - C.T.E. No.3 - cd
approved CTE:
DPWH Project Engineer I/ll/Ill Consultant's Project/Resident Engr.
Approved:

Position
Nflte: for CWSD of beyond
60 cd for DED
IO'S LETTERH EAD
implemented projects
Annex C-1
CONTINUATION OF WORK SUSPENSION ORDER NO. _ (a)
Name of Project
Location
Date

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
Extension:
Approved Work
Suspension Order,
cd
WSO NO.2 - C.T.E. NO.2 - Days Remaining:
approved CTE:

Position
Note: for CWSO of beyond I -Annex C-2 I
120 cd for CO implemented IO'S LETTERH EAD
projects. with Construction
Name of Project
Location
Date

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
Hereunder is the historical data of your approved Work Suspension Order and Contract 1ime
Extension:
Approved Work
Suspension Order,
cd
WSO No.2 - C.T.E. No.2 -
Days Remaining:
Revised including WSO No.3 - C.T.E. No.3 -
cd
approved CTE:
Approved:

Position
Note: for CWSO of beyond
120 cd for CO implemented IO'S LETTERHEAD
projects without Construction Annex C-3
Name of Project
Location
Date

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
Extension:
Approved Work
Suspension Order,
cd
Original: _ WSO No. 1 - C.T.E. NO.1 -
approved CTE:
DPWH Project Engineer IjII/III
Approved:

Position
pLETTERHEAD OF THE IMPLEMENTING OFFICE
I Annex D I
MONTHLY TIME SUSPENSION REPORT
Month, Year
Name of Project:
Location:
Date Weather * Remarks ** Work Suspension Recommended ***

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Total Work Suspension Recommended for this Month, (A)
Total Work Suspension Recommended Previously, (B)
Grand Total to Date, C=(A+B)
Total Number of Pre-Determined Unworkable/Rainy Days of the Contract (D)
Cumulative Pre-Determined Unworkable/Rainy Days Considered (E)
Balance of Pre-Determined Unworkable/Rainy Days Not Yet Considered F=(D -E)
Total Number of Unworkable Days Recommended for CTE, G=C - D if F=O
Prepared by: Concurred:
PROJECT ENGINEER CONTRACTOR

CDPWHand Consultant, if there's any)
Checked/Verified by: Approved: ****

CHIEF OF IMP. UNIT IPROJ. MANAGER HEAD OF IMPLEMENTING OFFICE
Note: This document is only a part of the supporting documents in processing Contract Time
Extension and is not a basis to revise the contract duration and expiry date.
*Indicate whether fa.ir, cloudy, rain shower, or heavy rain
**Indicate whether workable or unworkable
*** Indicate "One (1) Day" if unworkable and "None" if workable
**** The Head of 10 shall write the date of approval of this MTSR
· '
Note: for Contract Time
10'5 LETTERHEAD
Extension up to 60 cd for
OEO implemented projects
CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION NO. I Annex E-l
Contract Time Extension No. is hereby granted for the project

-------------------------------,
under contract with , equivalent to _ (in words and figure) calendar
days, covering the period from (MM/DD/YY) to (MM/DD/YY), in view of the approved" Work
Suspension Order No. _ and Work Resume Order No. _" or ''Monthly Time Suspension
Report for the Month of __ " or "Slowdown of WorK' (choose one and delete the other
two) due to (~tate reason/s e.g. RROW Problem/oeace and order condition/unfavorable
weather condition).
Effectivity of Contract
Original Contract Duration
Original Expiry Date
Contract Time Extension No. Duration Revised Contract Revised Expiry

Duration Date
Prepared by:
I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Contract Time Extension.
Date: _ CONTRACTOR'SAUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE
Position
Note: for Contract 77me
10'5 LElTERHEAD
Extension beyond 60 cd
for DEO implemented
Annex E-2 I
projects CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION NO.

-------------------------------"
Report for the Month of __ " or ''Slowdown of Work" (choose one and delete the other
two) due to (~tate reason/s e.g. RROW Problem/oeace and order condition/unfavorable
weather condition).

Duration Date
Prepared by:
Date: _ CONTRACfOR'SAUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE
Position
Note: for RO implemented
projects IO'S LETTERHEAD
Annex E-3
CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION NO.

-------------------------------.,
under contract with • equivalent to _ (in words and figure) calendar
Report for the Month of __ " or "Slowdown of WorK' (choose one and delete the other
two) due to (~tate reason/s e.g. RROW Problem/peace and order condition/unfavorable
weather condition).

Duration Date
Prepared by:
Position
Note: for CO implemented
10'5 LETTERHEAD
projects up to 120 cd with
Construction Supervision Annex E-4a
'--u_on_5_u_lta_n_t --' CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION NO.

-------------------------------.,
Suspension Order No. _ and Work Resume Order No. _ "or "Monthly Time Suspension
Report for the Month of __ " or "Slowdown of Work" (choose one and delete the other
two) due to ($tate reason/s e.g. RROW Problem/peace and order condition/unfavorable
weather condition).

Duration Date
Prepared by:
Approved:

Position
Note: for CO implemented 10'5 LElTERHEAD
projects up to 120 cd
without Construction
SupelVision Consultant CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION NO. Annex E-4b I

,
Suspension Order No. _ and Work Resume Order No. _" or "Monthly Time Suspension
two) due to ($tate reason/s e.C1.RROW Problem/oeace and order condition/unfavorable
weather condition).

Duration Date
Prepared by:
DPWH Project Engineer I/ll/III
Position
10'5 LETTERHEAD
projects beyond 120 cd
with Construction Annex E-Sa
SupelVision Consultant CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION NO.

------------------------------_.,
two) due to (?tate reason/s e.Q. RROW Problem/peace and order condition/unfavorable
weather condition).

Duration Date
Prepared by:
DPWH Project Engineer l/II/III Consultant's Project/Resident Engr.
Approved:
Position
10'5 LETTERHEAD
projects beyond 120 cd
without Construction Annex E-Sb
Supervision Consultant CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION NO.

-------------------------------,
under contract with equivalent to _
I (in words and figure) calendar
days, covering the period from (MM/DD/YY) to (MM/DD/YY), in view of the approved \\Work
Suspension Order No. _ and Work Resume Order No. _ "or ''Monthly Time Suspension
Report for the Month of __ " or ''Slowdown of Work" (choose one and delete the other
two) due to (~tate reason/s e.Q. RROW Problem/peace and order condition/unfavorable
weather condition).

Duration Date
Prepared by:
DPWH Project Engineer 1/I1/III
Approved:
Position
TIMEFRAME IN THE PREPARATION/REVIEW/EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF WORK SUSPENSION ORDER,
CONTINUANCE OF WORK SUSPENSION ORDER AND CONTRACT TIME EXTENSION
1. For District Engineering Office Implemented Projects ANNEX F
a. For approval by the District Engineer (up to 60 days)
30 days 10 days 5 days
Request shall be submitted within Investigation, Preparation,

30 days after the contractor Endorsement and Review/Approval of
became aware of the Recommendation by the the DE
circumstance and prior to expiry Implementing Unit (OED)
b. For approval by the Regional Director (beyond 60 cd)
I 30 days I 10 days 5 days 5 days

30 days after the contractor Endorsement and Review/Endorsement Review/ Approval of
became aware of the Recommendation by the of the OED the RD
circumstance and prior to expiry Implementing Unit (OED)
2. For Regional Office Implemented Projects
a. For approval by the Regional Director (no limit)
Investigation, Preparation,
Endorsement and Review/Approval of
Recommendation by the the RD
Implementing Unit (RD)
3. For UPMO Implemented Projects
a. For approval by the Project Director (up to 120 cd)
I 42 Days (FIOIe) I 42 days 7 days
Request shall be submitted by the Investigation, Preparation,

Contractor within 42 days after it Endorsement and Review/Approval by the UPMD
became aware of the Recommendation by the Cluster
circumstance Consultant and Project Engineer
b. For approval by the Undersecretary for Operations (beyond 120 cd)
42 Days (FIOIC) 42 days 7 days I 2 days I

Request shall be submitted by the Investigation, Preparation,
Contractor within 42 days after it Endorsement and Approval
Review by the UPMD Cluster
became aware of the Recommendation by the of U/Sec.
circumstance Consultant and Project Engineer
4. For Central Office Implemented Projects other than UPMO
a. For approval by the Bureau Director (up to 120 cd)

30 days after the contractor Endorsement and
Review/approval of the Bureau
became aware of the Recommendation by the
circumstance and prior to expiry Implementing Unit
b. For approval by the Undersecretary for Operations (beyond 120 cd)
30 days 8 days 7 days I 2 days I

30 days after the contractor Endorsement and Approval
Review/approval of the Bureau
became aware of the Recommendation by the of U/Sec.
circumstance and prior to expiry Implementing Unit
5. For Work Resumption Order
Note1: Implementing Unit is the

a. For approval by the Head of Implementing Office
Section implementing the project
e.g. Construction, Maintenance,
15 days X Days
etc.
Request shall be submitted by the

Contractor within 15 days after it Approval by the Head of the
Note2: All days indicated herein is
became aware of the Implementing Office
the maximum to complete action
circumstance
" __ 14 n t ,.
Republic of the Philippines - /
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS . a:r7.B OP~

oc... 04. irD
CENTRAL OFFICE
Manila
MAY 2 9 2020
DEPARTMENT ORDER ) SUBJECT: GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW)
ACQUISITION AND PAYMENT OF
NO. 43 ~ ANCESTRALDOMAINS AFFECTEDBY THE

IMPLEMENTATION OF NATIONAL
Series of 2020 'f!V D(".D'1.1lf'}f{ GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE
PROJECTS
Pursuant to Section 9, Article III of the 1987 Constitution, private property shall not be
taken for public use without just compensation, and the recognized rights of Indigenous
Cultural Communities (ICe) or Indigenous Peoples (IP) under Republic Act No. 8371 (R.A.
No. 8371), otherwise known as "The Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA) of 1997", this
Department hereby provides for the guidelines on right-of-way (ROW) acquisition and
payment of ancestral domains affected by the implementation of national government
infrastructure projects.
Considering the nature of lands of ancestral domains, easement of right-of-way is the most
convenient and practicable mode for the acquisition of ancestral domains among the modes
of ROW acquisition mentioned in Republic Act No. 10752. Under the mode of acquiring
easement of right-of-way, upon execution of ROW easement agreement, the owner will
grant the Implementing Agency the right to use the affected portion of the lot as ROW but
the owner retains the ownership thereof, which is consistent/compatible with the nature of
the ancestral domains as community property of ICCs and IPs that cannot be sold, disposed
or destroyed, and guarantees their right to return to their ancestral domains in case DPWH
will no longer need the same as part of road right-of-way of the national road.
Compensation will be given to the ICCs/IPs based on the existing BIR Zonal Valuation at the
time of actual construction of national government infrastructure project.
Although, the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of Republic Act No. 10752 provide
that easement of right-way can be resorted "if the portion of a lot needed for a ROW is
minimal, such that the expenses for surveying or segregating that portion from
the main lot would be very much more than the value of the part of the lot
needed", there is no explicit prohibition in the aforementioned law of using the said mode
in other instances. In fact, it is provided in the IRR of the said law that, "[t]he mode of
ROW acquisition through easement agreement may also be used in government
agency-to-agency transactions, including those involving government-
owned and controlled corporations." By inference, easement of right-of way may be
used in other cases if warranted by the circumstances and if the ICCs/IPs will agree thereto.
Its applicability is not exclusive to the condition that the land to be acquired is only minimal
in area.
Thus, in order to facilitate (ROW) claims involving ancestral domains owned by ICCs and
IPs, recognized under R.A. No. 8371, affected by the implementation of national
government infrastructure projects, the following guidelines are hereby adopted and shall
be incorporated in the DPWH Right-of-Way Acquisition Manual (DRAM):
D.O. No. ~ Series of 2020
Guidelines for Right-Of-Way (ROW) Acquisition and Payment of
Ancestral Domains Affected by the Implementation of
National Government Infrastructure Projects
. Page 2 of 6
"Section 2.16" of the DRAM is renumbered as "Section 2. 16-A", with the amended title
"ROW Acquisition by Easement of ROW (Minimal Area)"; and a new subsequent section is
hereby established as "Section 2.16-8", with the title "ROW Acquisition by Easement of ROW
(Ancestral Domain)", to wit:
"2.16-8 ROW Acquisition by Easement of ROW (Ancestral Domain)
Objective: To acquire RROW through Easement of ROW involving lands

covered by Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT) or NCIP-confirmed
Ancestral Domain.
Lead Office/Person:
For Projects at the CO: UPMO Clusters/ PPPSDirector
For Other Projects: RD/DE
For All Projects: NCIP
Support:
• UPMO Cluster/ PPPSDirector
• RO Staff
• DO Staff
Overview:
This procedure is applicable to the acquisition of Lands and/or Improvements

within an ancestral domain covered by Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title
(CADT) or those with pending issuance of the CADT but the National
Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) confirms as ancestral domain.
Further, this procedure applies only to national government infrastructure
projects implemented by the DPWH involving road opening and widening,
implemented after the effectivity of the IPRA of 1997 and to be implemented
now or in the future on ancestral domain covered by CADTs.
Under this mode, a ROW Easement Agreement shall be executed by and

between the NCIP Accredited or Certified Tribal Council and the
Implementing Office (10), whereby the former will grant the latter the
absolute and unimpeded right to use the affected portion of their ancestral
domain as Road Right-of-Way (RROW) for as long as the public purpose
requirement subsists, but the IPs/ICCs retain ownership of that portion of the
lot. This shall be in accordance with the procedure and requirements set forth
hereunder, viz:
Procedure:
1. Upon determining that a road opening or road widening project will

traverse/affect lands covered by CADTs, the 10 shall immediately
coordinate with the NCIP for the issuance of Certification Precondition
(CP).
Notwithstanding lengths and widths of the programmed phases or

packages of the project at the time of construction, the CP to be
Page 3 of 6
secured shall cover a thirty meter (30m) width RROW for the entire
stretch of the road opening or the entire stretch of every national
highway for widening within the ancestral domain.
The CP shall specifically state, among others, that the area affected
does not overlap with any ancestral domain and that the free and
prior informed consent (FPIC) of all members of the project affected
ICCs/IPs have been secured and embodied in a Memorandum of
Agreement on FPIC duly endorsed by NCIP.
2. Thereafter, the 10, with the assistance of the NCIP, shall conduct
parcellary and/or structural survey and prepare the corresponding
plans, as the case may be, to determine the actual area and/or
improvements to be affected or previously affected by the national
government infrastructure project.
3. The 10 shall only deal with the Tribal Councilor the Authorized Tribal
Council Member, duly accredited and certified by the NCIP as
representing the ICCs/IPs whose CADT is affected by the project, with
the assistance of the NCIP.
For purposes of processing ROW Payments, the NCIP Accredited or

Certified Tribal Council shall designate an Authorized Signatory, who
shall be a member of the said Tribal Council. All issues and concerns
pertaining to the acquisition of land and improvement shall be coursed
through the NCIP.
4. Determinationof the CompensationPrice. Based on the approved

parcellary plan, compute the right-of-way acquisition compensation
price by multiplying the total affected area with the corresponding
current, relevant BIR Zonal 'Valuation at the time of actual
construction of the road widening and road opening project. Said
compensation price shall be paid to the ICCs/IPs through the NCIP
accredited Tribal Councilor Tribal Council authorized signatory.
In case of outstanding claims, the basis of computing compensation

price shall be the BIR Zonal Valuation at the time of actual
construction of the road widening and road opening project.
Replacement cost of improvements (structures, crops, and trees) that

will be affected based on the approved parcellary and/or structural
survey plan shall also be determined based on existing rules therefor,
which shall be paid to the individual owners or to the NCIP accredited
or certified tribal council, whichever is applicable.
5. Issuanceof Notice of Taking.Once the compensation price for the

affected property (parcels of land and improvements) is determined, a
Notice of Taking shall be issued to the ICCs/IPs through the NCIP
accredited Tribal Council, with the assistance of NCIP, detailing the
total area affected, the corresponding BIR Zonal Valuation, and the
Page 4 of 6
total compensation price of the affected area, which notice shall

constitute as the formal and definite offer for the affected portion of
the ancestral domain. (In accordance with Section 11 of R.A. No.
10752)
In case of affected improvements, Notice of Taking shall be issued to

the individual ICCs/IPs through their NCIP accredited Tribal Council,
with the assistance of NCIP.
In case of outstanding claims, Letter Offer shall be issued instead of

the Notice of Taking.
6. Acceptanceor Rejectionof Offer. If the Tribal Council accepts the

compensation price offered by the IO, the NCIP Accredited or Certified
Tribal Council shall, within thirty (30) days from receipt of the Notice
of Taking or Letter Offer, communicate their acceptance in writing,
coupled with NCIP Certification that all project affected ICC/IP
members have been duly informed of the said acceptance of the
compensation price, and none interposed any objection thereto.
If the ICCs/IPs, through the NCIP Accredited or Certified Tribal

Council, rejects, refuse to receive, or fails to respond in writing to the
price offer within thirty (30) days from receipt of the Notice of Taking
or Letter Offer; or refuses or fails to negotiate, or refuses or fails to
submit pertinent documents within thirty (30) days from receipt of
notice or request, the 10 may resort to any appropriate legal
action/remedy, with the assistance of the Office of the Solicitor
General (OSG), against all the ICCs/IPs through the Tribal Council
representing them.
7. Prepare the voucher at fifty percent (50%) of the compensation price

of the land obtained in Step 4, and, if applicable, seventy percent
(70%) of the Replacement Cost of the improvements/structures and
assessed value of the crops and trees determined based on existing
DPWH guidelines, rules, and regulations.
8. Refer below for the documentary requirements for payment of

easement of ROW.
9. Once the compensation price is accepted, the ROW Easement

Agreement shall be prepared, and all documentary requirements shall
be secured. Upon signing of the ROW Easement Agreement and
receipt by the project affected ICCs/IPs, through the NCIP Accredited
or Certified Tribal Council, of the initial payment, the 10 shall clear the
ROW in accordance with the pertinent provisions of the DRAM.
10. The 10 shall be allowed to immediately enter and take possession of

the ancestral domain subject of the ROW Easement Agreement and
implement national government infrastructure projects upon execution
of the ROW Easement Agreement and receipt by the ICCs/IPs,
Page 5 of 6
through the NCIP Accredited or Certified Tribal Council, of the first

payment of just compensation representing fifty percent (50%) of the
total compensation based on the SIR Zonal Valuation at the time of
actual taking and, if applicable, seventy percent (70%) of the
Replacement Cost of the structures/improvements and assessed value
of the crops and trees determined by the 10 based on existing DPWH
guidelines, rules, and regulations.
11. The 10 shall pay the remaining fifty percent (50%) of the total
compensation for the land upon annotation of the ROW Easement
Agreement on the Title. If applicable, the IO shall pay the remaining
thirty percent (30%) of the Replacement Cost and assessed value of
crops and tress once the improvements/structures, crops and trees
have been completely removed and/or demolished.
12. The ROW Easement Agreement shall be annotated to the CADT at the
Land Registration Authority or concerned Register of Deeds within
fifteen (15) working days from the date of its execution.
13. Provide the 10 database copies of the ROW Easement Agreement and
the Electronic Certified True Copy of the CADT containing the
annotation.
14. The 10 shall process the final payment of the claim and make sure to
release the same once the ROW Easement Agreement has been
annotated on the CADT and, if applicable, the land is completely
cleared of the improvements.
Documentary Requirements for Payment of Easement of ROW:
1. Original CADT or Electronic Certified True Copy from ROD with O.R.;
2. If CADT is not yet issued, Certified True Copy of Approved Original

Plan with verified written confirmation of the site as Ancestral Domain
by NCIP;
3. Parcellary and/or Structural Survey Plan duly prepared and approved

by DPWH;
4. Tax Declaration (Original or Certified True Copy at the time of actual

taking);
5. Certification-Exempt from Real Property Tax issued by the

City/Municipal Treasurer;
6. SIR Zonal Valuation of the affected area duly certified by SIR;
7. NCIP Certification/Accreditation of Indigenous Political Structure (IPS)/

Indigenous Peoples Organization (IPO) recognized in the Ancestral
Domain;
Page 6 of 6
8. NCIP Certification that all project affected ICC/IP members have been
duly informed of the said acceptance of the compensation price and
none interposed any objection thereto;
9. Photocopy, with three (3) specimen signatures, of two (2) valid

government issued IDs of all Tribal Council Members who issued the
resolution, and of the Tribal Council Member designated to transact
ROW Claims and receive payment;
10. Original or Certified True Copy of the Amendment Plan (Subdivision

Plan) approved by the land Management Service, DENR;
11. Original Copy of the Certification of Non-Overlap from the land

Management Bureau (lMB) that the affected ancestral domain
property does not overlap with any titled/registered property;
12. Registry of Deeds Certification that the Original of the Title is intact;
13. Notarized Original Resolution of the Tribal Council authorizing the

Tribal Council Member designated to transact ROW Claims and receive
payment, duly certified by the NCIP;
14. Original Copy of the Certification from NCIP that the signatories in the
Resolution are authorized and representative of the ICCs/IPs affected;
15. Certified True Copy of the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) on FPIC

for future projects;
16. Certified True Copy of NCIP Certification of ICC/IP Consent for

completed projects; and
17. Original Copy of Certification Precondition (CP) for past, present, and
future projects."
For strict compliance.

,
MARK A. VILLAR
Secreta ry

1111111111111111111111111111111111111
WINOA04311
J7/0
6-~L~-},
"
Republic of the Philippines Oql-·\3 Drw~
O(P·~·1.D
Manila
MAR '1 0 2D20

DEPARTMENT ORDER ) SUBJECT: Amendments to D.O. No. 31,
) s.2019 Re: "Revised Guidelines
NO._ 47
Series of 2020
)
)
)
on The Installation ot Road
Right-Ot-Way (RROW) Boundary
Marker, Kilometer Post, and
Street Name Along National
Highways on Rural and Urban
Areas"
For consistency, and to further explain the specific guidelines in the installation of Kilometer
Post along National Road, Item nos. 1 to 3 under Part B - Kilometer Post of the Department
Order No. 31, series of 2019, are hereby amended as follows, for the guidance of all
concerned:
1. Kilometer posts shall be installed on all primary and secondary national roads
following the design and specification shown in Annexes "E-1" to "E-4" and
conforming to the Road and Bridge Information Application (RBIA) established
positioning/location. All existing kilometer posts along primary and secondary
roads shall be removed and reinstalled along tertiary roads with proper
relabeling.
2. Kilometer posts must never be moved or relabeled apart from the RBIA
established positioning without consulting the Road and Bridge Information
Administration Section of the Statistics Division (SO) of the Planning Service.
3. In the event of road conversion which necessitates installation of new set of

kilometer posts, consultation with the SO should likewise be undertaken prior to
installation. As such, kilometer posts shall be installed on the right side of the
road (along the direction away from the reference location) at one (1) kilometer
interval as shown in Annex "B", It shall be located outside the shoulder at 2.S0m
(max.) from the edge of the road pavement. Where the shoulder is less than
2.0m, the post shall be located at O.SOmsetback from the edge of the shoulder.
Whenever there is an obstruction at the proposed location of kilometer post (i.e.,
bridge, junction, gateway, railroad crossing, etc.), offsetting should be done
either backward or forward whichever is visible, and the corresponding chainages
should be recorded and uploaded in the RBIA. Distance interval of kilometer
posts shall be measured along the centerline of the carriageway of the road using
a survey vehicle with integrated trip meter or by steel tape.
DO No. , s. 2020
Amendments to D.O. No. 31, s.2019 Re: "Revised Guidelines on the Installation of Road Right-of-Way (RROW)
Boundary Marker, Kilometer Post, and Street Name along National Highways on Rural and Urban Areas"
.. Page 2 of 2
All the other provisions specified in Department Order No. 31, s. 2019 shall remain enforced
until such future amendments or revision relative thereto is issued.
This order shall take effect immediately.
~~_._-
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary
5.1.3 DLBjAMD
1111111111111111111111111111111111111
WINOR01528
OQ1· '?J t>Pw\t
-..,.------
Republic of the Philippines . c:A\ (g. \1. Q,olO
CENTRAL OFFICE
Manila
MAY 1 5 2020
DEPARTMENT ORDER ) SUBJECT: Standard Project Logbook Format
)
No._5_0__ )
)
Series of 2020 ~ ltlt1I~1P
In order to ensure the uniformity of format during Project Implementation for monitoring and
updating of day-to-day activities in the project site, this Standard Project (Construction
& Materials) Logbook Format applicable for locally funded and foreign assisted projects is
hereby issued to be utilized by all Implementing Offices of the Department.
The issuance of the standard project logbook aims to establish consistency in the format and
improve the Department's means of accomplishing the required project documents.
This standard template can be downloaded from the DPWH Intranet (http:dpwhnet) under
Construction Forms, and is advised to be printed in 50 or 100 pages, hardbound for each
project.
- ~--------:;7~
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary Departrrent of Public Works and Highways
11111111111111111 "111111111111111111
WINOW02153
6.1.3 RCNjECGjEAA
COVER PAGE (HARDBOUND - royal blue)
Side View Front View

BACK PAGE (HARDBOUND - royal blue)
Rear View
(IMPLEMENTING OFFICE)
(Office Address)
PROJECT PROFILE
Implementing Office DPWH -
Contract 10 :
Project Name & Address
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Station Limits :
Scope/Description of Works :
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
B. CONTRACT DATA
Province :
Region :
Project Category :
Source of Fund
(Locally Funded/Foreign Assisted)
Contractor
Consultant :
Original Contract Amount
Revised Contract Amount due to Approved
VO# :
VO# :
VOl :
Start Date
Revised Contract Duration due to Approved
TE # __ /VO# __ :
TE# __ /VO# __ :
TE# __ /VO# __ :
:
Original Completion Date
Revised Completion Date due to Approved
TE# __ /VO# __ :
TE# __ /VO# __
TE# __ /VO# __ :
:
C. KEY PERSONNEL
C.l DPWH PERSONNEL:

NAME ACCREDITATION NO./PRC NO.
Project Engineer -
Materials Engineer -
Project Inspectors -
-
-
-
C.2 CONSULTANTS PERSONNEL:
-
-
-
-
-
C.3 CONTRACTOR'S PLEDGED KEY PERSONNEL:

Project Engineer -
Safety Engineer/Officer -
Site Engineer/s -
-
-
-
-
-
-
D. UST OF CONTRACTOR'S PLEDGED EQUIPMENT
NO. OF NO. OF
EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION
UNITS UNITS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
(Office Address)
12
CONTRACT ID NO.
PROJECT COMPONENT 10
PROJECT NAME 9 3
LOCATION
CONTRACTOR
CONSULTANT
DATE
6
LEGEND:
WEATHER A.M. (outer circle) FAIR
P.M. (inner circle) CLOUDY
RAIN SHOWER
HEAVY RAIN
MANPOWER ON SITE:
MANPOWER No. MANPOWER No.

Project Manager Foreman
Project Engineer Driver
Materials Engineer Heavy Equipment Operators
Project Inspectors Laborers
Survey Engineer Mechanic
Mechanical Engineer Auto Electrician
Electrical Engineer Laboratory Technician
Plumbing/Sanitary Engineer Carpenters
Safety Officer/Safety & Health Personnel Masons
Others (specify) : Others (specify) :
EQUIPMENT ON SITE:
No. of No. of
Status TYPE OF EQUIPMENT Status TYPE OF EQUIPMENT STATUS OF EQUIPMENT :
Units Units
Bulldozer Asphalt Paver Operational
Backhoe Asphalt Distributor Idle
Backhoe with Breaker Air Compressor " Breakdown
;
Payloader Tandem Roller na Not Applicable
Dump Truck Pneumatic Roller
Water Truck Electric Generator
Concrete Paver Concrete Cutter
Vibratory Roller Crawler Crane
Batching Plant, Concrete/Asphalt Submerssible Pump
Concrete Vibrator Material Testing Equipment
Screeder Others (specify) :
One Bagger Mixer
Plate Compactor
Welding Machine
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES:
Continued at the back of this pdge.
Page No..
REMARKS:
DPWH PERSONNEL ON-SITE:
NAME TIME-IN TIME-OUT SIGNATURE
CONSULTANTS PERSONNEL ON-SITE:
VISITORS ON-SITE:
Prepared by: Concurred by:
Site Engineer /Site Inspector / Project Engineer (Contractor)

Project Inspector (DPWH/Consultant)
Noted by:
Project Engineer (DPWH)
Page No ..

Rear View
•
(Office Address)
PROJECT PROFILE
Implementing Office : DPWH -
Contract ID :
Station Limits :
:
:
:
:
:
:
B. CONTRACT DATA
Province
Region :
Project Category :
Source of Fund
Contractor
Consultant
VO# :
VO#
VO# :
:
Start Date
TE # __ /VO# __
TE # __ /VO# __ :
TE # __ /VO# __ :

TE# __ /VO# __ :
TE # __ /VO# __
TE # __ /VO# __
C. KEY PERSONNEL
C.l DPWH MATERIALS QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL:

-
-
-
-
-
C.2 CONSULTANTS QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL:
- NAME ACCREDITATION NO./PRC NO.
-
-
-
C.3 CONTRACTOR'S MATERIALS QUAUTY CONTROL PERSONNEL:

NAME ACCREDITATION NO.{PRC NO.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(Office Address)
CONTRACT ID NO.
PROJECT COMPONENT ID
PROJECT NAME
LOCATION
CONTRACTOR
CONSULTANT
DATE
QUALITY CONTROLI ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES:
Page No.
REMARKS:
Prepared by: ConcUlTed by:
Materials Engineer (DPWH/Consultant) Materials Engineer (Contractor)
Noted by:
Page No.
OQ1· '?J t>Pw\t
-..,.------
Republic of the Philippines . c:A\ (g. \1. Q,olO
CENTRAL OFFICE
Manila
MAY 1 5 2020
DEPARTMENT ORDER ) SUBJECT: Standard Project Logbook Format
)
No._5_0__ )
)
Series of 2020 ~ ltlt1I~1P
In order to ensure the uniformity of format during Project Implementation for monitoring and
updating of day-to-day activities in the project site, this Standard Project (Construction
& Materials) Logbook Format applicable for locally funded and foreign assisted projects is
hereby issued to be utilized by all Implementing Offices of the Department.
The issuance of the standard project logbook aims to establish consistency in the format and
improve the Department's means of accomplishing the required project documents.
This standard template can be downloaded from the DPWH Intranet (http:dpwhnet) under
Construction Forms, and is advised to be printed in 50 or 100 pages, hardbound for each
project.
- ~--------:;7~
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary Departrrent of Public Works and Highways
11111111111111111 "111111111111111111
WINOW02153
6.1.3 RCNjECGjEAA

Rear View
(Office Address)
PROJECT PROFILE
Implementing Office DPWH -
Contract 10 :
Station Limits :
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
B. CONTRACT DATA
Province :
Region :
Project Category :
Source of Fund
Contractor
Consultant :
VO# :
VO# :
VOl :
Start Date
TE # __ /VO# __ :
TE# __ /VO# __ :
TE# __ /VO# __ :
:
TE# __ /VO# __ :
TE# __ /VO# __
TE# __ /VO# __ :
:
C. KEY PERSONNEL
C.l DPWH PERSONNEL:

Project Engineer -
Project Inspectors -
-
-
-
C.2 CONSULTANTS PERSONNEL:
-
-
-
-
-
C.3 CONTRACTOR'S PLEDGED KEY PERSONNEL:

Project Engineer -
Safety Engineer/Officer -
Site Engineer/s -
-
-
-
-
-
-
D. UST OF CONTRACTOR'S PLEDGED EQUIPMENT
NO. OF NO. OF
EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION
UNITS UNITS
(Office Address)
12
CONTRACT ID NO.
PROJECT COMPONENT 10
PROJECT NAME 9 3
LOCATION
CONTRACTOR
CONSULTANT
DATE
6
LEGEND:
WEATHER A.M. (outer circle) FAIR
P.M. (inner circle) CLOUDY
RAIN SHOWER
HEAVY RAIN
MANPOWER ON SITE:
MANPOWER No. MANPOWER No.

Project Manager Foreman
Project Engineer Driver
Materials Engineer Heavy Equipment Operators
Project Inspectors Laborers
Survey Engineer Mechanic
Mechanical Engineer Auto Electrician
Electrical Engineer Laboratory Technician
Plumbing/Sanitary Engineer Carpenters
Safety Officer/Safety & Health Personnel Masons
Others (specify) : Others (specify) :
EQUIPMENT ON SITE:
No. of No. of
Status TYPE OF EQUIPMENT Status TYPE OF EQUIPMENT STATUS OF EQUIPMENT :
Units Units
Bulldozer Asphalt Paver Operational
Backhoe Asphalt Distributor Idle
Backhoe with Breaker Air Compressor " Breakdown
;
Payloader Tandem Roller na Not Applicable
Dump Truck Pneumatic Roller
Water Truck Electric Generator
Concrete Paver Concrete Cutter
Vibratory Roller Crawler Crane
Batching Plant, Concrete/Asphalt Submerssible Pump
Concrete Vibrator Material Testing Equipment
Screeder Others (specify) :
One Bagger Mixer
Plate Compactor
Welding Machine
Continued at the back of this pdge.
Page No..
REMARKS:
DPWH PERSONNEL ON-SITE:
NAME TIME-IN TIME-OUT SIGNATURE
CONSULTANTS PERSONNEL ON-SITE:
VISITORS ON-SITE:
Prepared by: Concurred by:
Site Engineer /Site Inspector / Project Engineer (Contractor)

Project Inspector (DPWH/Consultant)
Noted by:
Page No ..

Rear View
•
(Office Address)
PROJECT PROFILE
Implementing Office : DPWH -
Contract ID :
Station Limits :
:
:
:
:
:
:
B. CONTRACT DATA
Province
Region :
Project Category :
Source of Fund
Contractor
Consultant
VO# :
VO#
VO# :
:
Start Date
TE # __ /VO# __
TE # __ /VO# __ :
TE # __ /VO# __ :

TE# __ /VO# __ :
TE # __ /VO# __
TE # __ /VO# __
C. KEY PERSONNEL
C.l DPWH MATERIALS QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL:

-
-
-
-
-
C.2 CONSULTANTS QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL:
- NAME ACCREDITATION NO./PRC NO.
-
-
-
C.3 CONTRACTOR'S MATERIALS QUAUTY CONTROL PERSONNEL:

NAME ACCREDITATION NO.{PRC NO.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(Office Address)
CONTRACT ID NO.
PROJECT COMPONENT ID
PROJECT NAME
LOCATION
CONTRACTOR
CONSULTANT
DATE
QUALITY CONTROLI ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES:
Page No.
REMARKS:
Prepared by: ConcUlTed by:
Materials Engineer (DPWH/Consultant) Materials Engineer (Contractor)
Noted by:
Page No.
Manila
JUN 2 2 2020
DEPARTMENT ORDER ) SUBJECT: REVISED GUIDELINES IN THE
PREPARATION OF CONCEPTUAL
NO. 55 l
)
DESIGN, DETAILED ENGINEERING
DESIGN, "AS-STAKED", REVISED,
Series of 2019 dt ~1!ql1o~) AND "AS-BUILT" PLANS FOR
HIGHWAY, BRIDGE AND WATER
PROJECTS
To further improve the quality and for clearer and readable project plans, the following
guidelines shall be observed by all concerned offices of this Department in the preparation of
Conceptual Design, Detailed Engineering Design (DED), "As-Staked", Revised and "As-Built"
plans for highway, bridge and water projects:
1. All sheets in the set of Conceptual Design, DED, "As-Staked", Revised and "As-Built" Plans
for Highway, Bridge, Water Engineering and other related projects shall be uniform and
of one standard A-2 size (420mm x S94mm) mylar paper.
2. The scale to be used for various parts of the design plans shall be as follows:
a. Plan - 1:700;
b. Profile 1:70;
c. Cross-sections (roads) 1:100 (horizontal and vertical);
d. Cross-sections - Appropriate scale depending on the width of
(river/channel) the river/channel, and height of
embankment/excavation; and
e. Structural details, tables, notations, etc., shall vary depending on the scale and text
fonts prescribed in the latest DGCS edition and/or the designer's discretion provided
that each part shall be presented clearly and readable when printed in A-2 size
paper.
3. Draftsmanship shall be of professional quality. All plans shall be printed and drafted using
computer-aided design (CAD) software.
4. The meaning and intent of the provisions and/or specifications under the General Notes
shall be made clear and specific and shall leave no room for misinterpretations that may
lead to Variation Orders later on.
5. The title block for all sheets shall be made an integral part of the sheet of plan and not
merely patched-up therein. Cover sheets and title blocks shall vary depending on the
preparing and approving office. Formats for cover sheets and title blocks are as presented
in the following annexes:
• Cover Sheets:
Annexes "A-1" to "A-16" Conceptual Design Plan
Annexes "B-1" to "B-16" Detailed Engineering Design Plans
Annexes "C-1" to "C-6" "As-Staked" Plans
Annexes "D-1" to "D-ll" Revised Plans
D.O. No. -I Series of 2019
Revised Guidelines in the Preparation of Conceptual
Design, Detailed Engineering Design, "As-Staked", Revised,
and "As-Built" Plans for Highway, Bridge and Water Projects
Page 2 of 2
Annexes "E-1" to "E-6" "As-Built" Plans
• 1itle/Signature Blocks:
Annexes "F-1" to "F-4" Conceptual Design Plan
Annexes "G-1" to "G-4" Detailed Engineering Design Plans
Annexes "H-1" to "H-2" "As-Staked" Plans
Annexes "1-1" to "1-3" Revised Plans
Annexes "J-1" to "J-2" "As-Built" Plans
NOTE: All dimensions to be shown are in millimeters.
6. For Conceptual and DED plans prepared by the Design Consultants and "As-Staked",
Revised or "As-Built" Plans checked/reviewed by the Construction Supervision Consultants,
all sheets including the cover page shall be provided with a liability waiver duly signed by
their Project Manager. Similarly, for Design and Build Projects, all sheets of plan including
cover page shall be provided with liability waiver, as indicated in annexes "A-12" to "A-16"
and annexes "B-12" to "B-16" duly signed by the Contractor's Project Manager. The waiver
shall also be made an integral part of all sheets and not merely patched-up. Format of the
liability waivers shall be as presented in annexes "K-1" to "K-6".
7. All plans to be approved by the District Engineering Offices (DEO's) and Regional Offices
(RO's), except for "As-Built" plans, shall be prepared or reviewed by the Chief of the
Planning and Design Section/Division.
8. All sheets of the set of plan shall be neat, clean and without any crossed-out or voided
portion therein. Plans with corrections made by reviewing offiCials/offices shall be returned
to the designing office for correction or replacement.
9. The text style shall be Arial for all parts of the plan. Text height may vary depending on
the designer's desired size as long as all words are maintained legible. However, standard
text heights for cover sheets and title blocks shall be as illustrated in annexes "L -1 to L-
5".
Soft/electronic copy (in editable CAD file) of said "Annexes" and example drawing sheets can
be downloaded from DPWH (Bureau of Design) intranet.
This Order supersedes Department Order 77, Series of 2018 and shall take effect immediately.
~v--::=
Secretary
5.1.3DlB/lND 11111111 III 11111111111111111111111 III

WINOR01530
15mm from edge of the paper
IAnnex"A - 1"1
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES Style - Ariaf

H-6.4Omm ( Text~t=6.4Omm
)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS H-9.00mm

Style, Arial Bold
( TextHeIght. 9.00mm
)
<REGIONAL OFFICE No.> ~ Slylo-Arial

H=7.8Omm ( Text~t=7.8Omm
)
<DISTRICT ENGINEERING OFFICE>

<ADDRESS> Slyle'Ariaf
H-6.4Omm ( TextHeight=6.4Omm
)
.,
•...
Q. Style-Ariaf )
.,
•...
o C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT
.,
Q.
H-6.4Omm ( Text~'6.4Omm
Q.
:5 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN FOR H-6.4Omm

SlyIo=ArlaI
( TextHeight'6.4Omm
)
o
.,
Q.
:5
.•..
.,
(;
<NAME OF PROJECT> Style - AriafBold )

o
.,
.,
0>
"0
H-8.0Omm ( Text~=8.00mm
.,
0>
"0
E E
~a <SECTION> ~o
E E
E
o
l')
<LOCATION> E
00
<STATION LIMITS> H-6.00mm

SlyIo-ArlaI
( Text~t=6.00mm
)
<NET LENGTH>
<ROAD SECTION I BRIDGE 10>
I SlyIe'Arial )
H=3.0mm ( TextHeight· 3.00mm
H-4.40mm
Style = Arial Bold
( TextHoight'4.4Omm
)
H-3.00mm
Style-Arial
( Text~'3.00mm
)
H-2.5Omm
Style 'AriaI )
SUBMmED: RECOMMENDED: ( TextH0i!llil = 2.5Omm
APPROVED:
<SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE>
<NAME> <NAME> <NAME>

CHIEF, PLANNING AND DESIGN SECTION ASSISTANT DISTRICT ENGINEER DISTRICT ENGINEER
DATE DATE DATE
Conceptual Design Plan prepared and approved by the District Engineering OffIce
15mm from edge of the poper
IAnnex"A - 2'"
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

<REGIONAL OFFICE No.>
<ADDRESS>
.,
...
a.
....,
a.
".,
a.
".,
a.
;; ;;
'0
., C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT '0
.,
..,.,'" CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN FOR ..,'".,
E E
,g <NAME OF PROJECT> 0
.e
E E
E E
0
'" <SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
<ROAD SECTION / BRIDGE ID>
SUBMITTED: RECOMMENDED: APPROVED:

PROJECT MANAGER ASSISTANT DISTRICT ENGINEER DISTRICT ENGINEER
<CONSULTANT NAME>
DllTE DATE DllTE
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Consultant and approved by the District Engineering Office
IAnnex nA - 3"1

<ADDRESS>
~
Q.
•...
••
Q.
0 0
Q.
Q.
••
:S ••
:S
'0 C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT '0
" ••
••'" CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN FOR '"••
"0 "0
E E
,g <NAME OF PROJECT> a
./::
E E
E
0
<SECTION> J5
'"
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

CHIEF, PLANNING AND DESIGN SECTION DISTRICT ENGINEER REGIONAL DIRECTOR
DATE DATE DATE
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the District Engineering Office and approved by the Regional Office
IAnneX"A - 4"1

<ADDRESS>
~
Q.
..••
Q.
"
Q.
"
Q.
•• ••
-••
:5
0
..,'"
C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN FOR
-
:5
0
..,'"••
•• ••
E E
.::0 <NAME OF PROJECT> .::0
E E
E
...,
0
<SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

PROJECT MANAGER DISTRICT ENGINEER REGIONAL DIRECTOR
<CONSULTANT NAME>
DATE DATE DATE
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Consultant, checked and recommended by the District Engineering Office and approved by the Regional Office
IAnnex"A - 5"1

<ADDRESS>
.,a.~ .,a.
~
0 0
a.
.,
:5
.,:5a.
.•..a
.,
'"
"0
Q) CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN FOR '"
"0
Q)
E E
0
.j:
<NAME OF PROJECT> 0
.j:
E E
E E
,..,
0
~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
<ROAD SECTION / BRIDGE 10>

CHIEF, PLANNING AND DESIGN DIVISION ASSISTANT REGiONAl DIRECTOR REGIONAL DIRECTOR
DATE DATE DATE
Conceptual Design Plan prepared and approved by the Regional Office

IAnnex nA - 6"1

<ADDRESS>
.,
•..
Q.
•..
••0
Q.
0
.,
Q.
:S
Q.
••
.•. :5
0
••
."'" CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN FOR ."'"
•• ••
E E
0
.j:
<NAME OF PROJECT> g
E E
E E
,..,
0
<SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

PROJECT MANAGER ASSISTANT REGIONAL DIRECTOR REGIONAL DIRECTOR
<CONSULTANT NAME>
DATE DATE
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Consultant and approved by the Regional Office
IAnnex"A - 7"1

<ADDRESS>
~ •..
Q.
0
••
Q.
0
Q.
Q.
t)
:S ••
:S
t)
0>
-0
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN FOR
••
0>
•• -0
••
s
.l:: <NAME OF PROJECT>
E
a
.l::
E E
,.,E
0
<SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
<SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE>
<NAME> <NAME> <NAME> <NAME> <NAME>

CHIEF, PlANNING AND DESIGN DIVISION REGIONAL DIRECTOR DIRECTOR IV, BUREAU OF DESIGN ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
TECHNICAL SERVICES TECHNICAL SERVICES
DATE DATE DATE DATE
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Regional Office, checked and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex"A - 8"1

<ADDRESS>
•.. •..
'"
Q.
0 '"
Q.
0
Q. Q.
'"
:S '"
:S
'"
0>
"0 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN FOR '"
0>
"0
'" ••
E E
0
~ <NAME OF PROJECT> 0
ol:
E E
E E
0
I') <SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

PROJECT MANAGER REGIONAL DIRECTOR DIRECTOR IV, BUREAU OF DESIGN ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
<CONSULTANT NAME> TECHNICAL SERVICES TECHNICAL SERVICES
DATE DATE DATE DATE flATE
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Consultant, checked and recommended by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex nA - 9"1

<UPMO CLUSTER>
<ADDRESS>
•.. •..
'"
0-
0 '00-"
0- 0-
'"
:S '"
:S
'"
0>
'tl CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN FOR
••
0>
'tl
•• ••
E
.l:
E E
E E
0
<SECTION> ~
'"
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT DIRECTOR DIRECTOR N. BUREAU OF DESIGN ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
<UPMO CLUSTER> <UPMO CLUSTER> TECHNICAL SERVICES TECHNICAL SERVICES
~TE ~TE DATE
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by UPMO, checked and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex "A -10" I

<UPMO CLUSTER>
<ADDRESS>
...., ...
CD
0. 0.
0 0
0. 0.
CD CD
:5 :5
.•. C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT .•.
.,
0 0
'"., .,
CD
"0
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN FOR '"
"0
E E
0
./:: <NAME OF PROJECT> 0
./::
E E
~ E
'"
<SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT DIRECTOR DIRECTOR IV, BUREAU OF DESIGN ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
<CONSULTANT NAME> <UPMO CLUSTER> TECHNICAL SERVICES TECHNICAL SERVICES
DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Consultant, checked and recommended by UPMO and approved at the Central Office •
IAnnex"A - 11" I

BUREAU OF DESIGN
MANILA
~ •..
Q.
0
••
Q.
0
.,
Q. Q.
••
:S :S
.•...
'0 C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT
., 0
••
'"••
"0 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN FOR '"••
"0
E E
-=E
E
E
0
n <SECTION> .§
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
<ROAD SECTION I BRIDGE ID>
<SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE>
<NAME> <NAME> <NAME> <NAME>

CHIEF, <CONCERNED DIVISION> DIRECTOR IV, BUREAU OF DESIGN ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
DATE DATE DATE DATE
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Bureau of Design

IAnnex "A -12" I

<ADDRESS>
..
C>
0-
..
C>
o 0-
0- o
0-
C>
Q)
:S
.•.o C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT
:S
'0
C>
Q)
"'"
C> CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN (DESIGN AND BUILD) FOR
"'"
Q)
E E
.g <NAME OF PROJECT> .g
E E
E E
~ <SECTION> If)
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
-
TN!_O'T~
MCJl' __
~~;-IU.~~
"""TrTWIl1.\lSI!llllTSlII!lJON_
~V.
••••• O~,
__
••• D~
ifIOJ7TYOOh
T_o.orA_I'U.l.YCOIIIll'CT.IJ'.'n').l)O\'f'(._
<SIGNAlURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNAlURE>

CHIEF, PlANNING AND DESIGN SECTION ASSISTANT DISTRICT ENGINEER DISTRICT ENGINEER
DATE DATE DATE
Conceptual Design Plan prepared and approved by the District Engineering Office (for Design and Build Projects)
IAnnex"A - 13" I

<ADDRESS>
.,
•..
Q.
.,
•..
.,
Q.
o o
Q.
:5
.,
Q.
:5
(; C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT .,
(;
••
0>
"<l
•• CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN (DESIGN AND BUILD) FOR .,
0>
"<l
E E
o
J:: <NAME OF PROJECT> o
J::
E E
8 <SECTION>
E
III
'"
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

CHIEF, PlANNING AND DESIGN SECTION DISTRICT ENGINEER REGIONAL DIRECTOR
DATE DATE
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the District Engineering Office and approved by the Regional Office (for Design and Build Projects)
IAnnex "A - 14" I

<ADDRESS>
...,
0-
"-CD
o 0-
.,
0-
:5
o
0-
••
:5
C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT .•..a
.,
(;
".,
ClI ••
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN (DESIGN AND BUILD) FOR ClI
"CD
E
<NAME OF PROJECT> a
J::
E E
E E
o
..., <SECTION> If)
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

CHIEF, PLANNING AND DESIGN DIVISION ASSISTANT REGIONAL DIRECTOR REGIONAL DIRECTOR
DATE DATE DATE
Conceptual Design Plan prepared and approved by the Regional Office (for Design and Build Projects)
15mm from edge of th e paper
IAnnex"A - 15" I

<ADDRESS>
•..t> •..t>
0- 0-
o o
0- 0-
t> Q)
:S :S
•..o C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT '0
t> Q)
"t>'" CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN (DESIGN AND BUILD) FOR "'"

Q)
E
<NAME OF PROJECT> o
.j:
E E
E E
o
,..., <SECTION> It'l
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

CHIEF, PLANNING AND DESIGN DIVISION REGIONAL DIRECTOR DIRECTOR IV, BUREAU OF DESIGN ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Regional Office, checked and approved at the Central Office (for Design and Build Projects)
IAnnex "A - 16"1

<UPMO CLUSTER>
<ADDRESS>
...., ....,
0. 0.
o o
.,
0.
.,
0.
:5 :5
.•..o .•..o
., C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT
..,'" .,
..,'".,
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PLAN (DESIGN AND BUILD) FOR
"
E E
~o <NAME OF PROJECT> ~o
E E
E
~ <SECTION> to
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

<UPMO CLUSTER> <UPMO CLUSTER> TECHNICAL SERVICES TECHNICAL SERVICES
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by UPMO, checked and approved at the Central Office (for Design and Build Projects)
IAnnex"e _1"1
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES H=6.4Omm (

SlyIe=ArlaI
TeJrt He;;jIrt = 6.4Omm
)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS H=9.00mm (

' Style = Arlal Bold
TeJrtHe;;jlrt=9.00mm
)
<REGIONAL OFFICE No.> ~ H=7.BOmm (

Style-Ariel
TeJrt~=1.1lOmm
)

<ADDRESS> H=6.4Omm (
Style-Ariel
TeJrtHeIght=6.4Omm
)
iQ. •..
o
Q.
'"
Q.
o
Q.
'"
-
:5
a
'"
C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT H=6.4Omm (
StyIe=Aria/
TeJrtHelght=6.4Omm
)
'"
:5
'0
'i'"
Style-Ariel ) '"
DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN FOR H=6.4Omm ( TexI~=6.4Dmm
"'"'"
E
o
.l:: <NAME OF PROJECT> H= B.OOmm (
Style = Anal Bold
TeJrt He;;jIrt = 8.00mm
)
E E
E E
o <SECTION> It)
'"
<LOCATION>
Style = Arlal )
<STATION LIMITS> H=6.0Omm ( TeJrt HeIght = 6.00mm
<NET LENGTH>
I H=3.0mm (
Style-Aria!
TexlHeiglll=3.aomm
)
HK4.40mm (
Style - Aria!Bold
TeJrtH.,;ght=4.4Omm
)
HK3.00mm (
Style-Ariel
TeJrt~=3.00mm
)
H-2.50mm
Style = Aria! )
SUBMITTED: RECOMMENDED: ( Text ~l = 2.5Omm
APPROVED:

CHIEF, PlANNING AND DESIGN SECTION ASSISTANT DISTRICT ENGINEER DISTRICT ENGINEER
DATE DATE DATE
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared and approved by the District Engineering Office
IAnnex"8 - 2"1

<ADDRESS>
...., ....,
Q.
o Q.
o
.,
Q.
.,
Q.
:5 :5
.•..o
.,
~'" DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN FOR .,'"
"0
E E
o
J::
E E
E E
o
I") <SECTION> 10
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

<CONSULTANT NAME>
DATE DATE DATE
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Consultant and approved by the District Engineering Office
IAnnex "8 - 3"1

<ADDRESS>
~ ..
Q.
o '"
Q.
o
Q.
'"
:S
.,
Q.
:S
(; C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT (;
'"
]'" DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN FOR ''""
"0
E
'E"
~o <NAME OF PROJECT> o
~
E E
E E
,..,
o <SECTION> 10
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

CHIEF, PlANNING AND DESIGN SECTION DISTRICT ENGINEER REGIONAL DIRECTOR
DAlE DAlE DAlE
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the District Engineering Office and approved by the concerned Regional Office
IAnnex -B - 4"1

<ADDRESS>
•.. •..
"c-
Q)
C- c-
o o
c-
:5" Q)
:5
(; C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT .•..o
.""
Q)
01
DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN FOR 01
."
" Q)
E
<NAME OF PROJECT> o
.t:
E
E
g <SECTION>
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
1'H!'-"CCII\8U.TMTlIW.I.lIElfiIl'\U"~I'Of!ne.
.Tl'lUCI'UIIAI. OEnC''' ••1\_Of JHI! '_'~'(I,lII1'O
~AU.'N__ ~-'»J)~1'QfJ-'rolllMl'
--
~_WltIIOU1'1'lcE~Ol'1'H!~T~
-

<CONSULTANT NAME>
DATE DATE DATE
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Consultant, checked and recommended by the District Engineering Office and approved by the concerned Regional Office
IAnnex "B - 5" I

<ADDRESS>
~ ...
Q.
0 '"
Q.
0
Q. Q.
••
:5 '"
:5
., '"
"., ".,
0> 0>
DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN FOR
s
J:: <NAME OF PROJECT>
E
0
J::
E E
E E
,..,
0
<SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

CHIEF, PLANNING AND DESIGN DIVISION ASSISTANT REGIONAl DIRECTOR REGIONAL DIRECTOR
DATE DATE DATE
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared and approved by the Regional Office
IAnnex "B - 6" I

<ADDRESS>
~ •..
Q.
0
••
Q.
0
Q.
Q.
••
:S ••
£;
(; C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT .•.
0
Q)
co Q)
co
"0
•• DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN FOR "0
••
E
.t:
E E
E E
0
'" <SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
~-
-

PROJECT MANAGER ASSISTANT REGiONAl DIRECTOR REGIONAL DIRECTOR
<CONSULTANT NAME>
DATE DATE
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Consultant and approved by the Regional Office
IAnnex "8 - 7" I

<ADDRESS>
.,
'- '-
Q.
0 '0"
Q.
.,
Q. Q.
-.,
:5
0
.,'"
"0
C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT
DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN FOR
-
'"
:5
0
''""
"0
§ 'E"
.::: <NAME OF PROJECT> .:::0
E E
E E
0
'" <SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
<SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNA TIJRE> <SIGNA TIJRE> <SIGNATIJRE>

CHIEF, PLANNING AND DESIGN DIVISION REGIONAL DIRECTOR DIRECTOR IV, BUREAU OF DESIGN ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
Ilo\TE Ilo\TE Ilo\TE Ilo\TE Ilo\TE
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex "B - 8" I

<ADDRESS>
•.. •..
••
0- ••
0-
"
0-
"
0-
••
:5 ••
:5
•• ••
'" DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN FOR
il
"'"••
E
~
E E
E E
0
'" <SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

<CONSULTANT NAME> TECHNICAL SERVICES TECHNICAL SERVICES
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Consultant, checked and recommended by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex "B - g"l

<UPMO CLUSTER>
<ADDRESS>
.,•..
Q.
•...,
Q.
0 0
.,
Q.
:5
.,
Q.
:5

"-0
.g-
.,
"-0
., DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN FOR .,
O>
"0
E E
0
.l: <NAME OF PROJECT> 0
.l:
E E
..,E
0
<SECTION>
E
~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

<UPMO CLUSTER> <UPIJIO CLUSTER> TECHNICAL SERVICES TECHNICAL SERVICES
DATE DATE DATE DATE
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the concemed UPMO Cluster and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex "B -10" I

<UPMO CLUSTER>
<ADDRESS>
~ ...
Q)
Q. Q.
0 0
Q. Q.
••
:5
Q)
:5
.....
'0 C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT 0
•• Q)
'"••
"0 DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN FOR '"
"0
Q)
E
~ <NAME OF PROJECT> ~0
E E
E
,..,
0 <SECTION> J5
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

<CONSULTANT NAME> <UPMO CLUSTER> TECHNICAL SERVICES TECHNICAL SERVICES
llo\TE DATE DATE DATE llA.TE
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Consultant, checked and recommended by the concerned UPMO Cluster and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex"B _11" I

BUREAU OF DESIGN
MANILA
... ...
'o" .
a a" .
'o
a. a.
'"
:5 '"
:5
'" '"
'"'"'" DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN FOR ''"'""
E
<NAME OF PROJECT> o
>l=
E E
E
o <SECTION> Jj
'"
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

CHIEF, <CONCERNED DIVISION> DIRECTOR IV, BUREAU OF DESIGN ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
TECHNICAl SERVICES TECHNICAL SERVICES
DATE DATE DATE DATE
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Bureau of Design

IAnnex "B - 12" I

<ADDRESS>
•.. •..
••
0- ••
0-
"
0- "
0-
•• ••
-••
:5
o C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT
:5
(;
'"
il DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN (DESIGN AND BUILD) FOR ..,••'"
••
E E
o
.j:: <NAME OF PROJECT> o
.j::
E E
E E
o
..., <SECTION> 10
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
TIIIi_outD_Q~-".tolR~-.&_
lIl£~QI'l..j[DCl_~~PC_
~OFne:lI'1IIUCI\lIIe~CJfTrC~!ll.Cl't
__ ncllOlII'rHEi~EtITJI't_
1Ml!Cl)fRM(:'IOIIl_l.HBJ)A.uY~FQlO'THE-..cntIW.
~""1'tIll~·~CUE·IO---'J" _
__ lI __ WEClD.1DdUCPl'l'llI'IlIEQttofOOU_
1lfTM;lo.Irll'lE~0l' •••••QOII11IW:TOIt

<CONTRACTOR NAME>
DATE DATE DATE
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the District Engineering Office (for Design and Build Projects)
IAnnex "B -13" I

<ADDRESS>
~
Q. ~
o Q.
.,
Q.
:5
o
.,
Q.
:5
.,
(; C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT .,
(;
.,'"
"0
DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN (DESIGN AND BUILD) FOR .,'"
"0
E E
o
.l:: <NAME OF PROJECT> o
.l::
E E
E E
o <SECTION> 10
'"
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
"'~
1IlIi DIi __ -.o~lOll-'" ilIi IOUaY IIE-.& FOIl
lIE~TYIYT-EWAUD_t8IGIlI,...1t*
='::~~Of1>lli'"-""'CVAl.CWl
_COIlTlW;1Oll-..c • .-...ofI.UV~I'llIiTHE~ __
DIi~~OI.' __ ~~OlL'JO"""'l"f~
::::::.~..a:...~~FQfIMo....-e-

<CONTRACTOR NAME>
DATE DATE DATE
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the District Engineering Office and approved by the concerned Regional Office
IAnnex "8 - 14"1

<ADDRESS>
.,
...
a.
.,
...
a.
o
.,
a.
:5
o
.,
a.
:5
.,
'0 C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT .,
'0
.,'"
"0
DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN (DESIGN AND BUILD) FOR .,'"
"0
E E
o
J::
E
E
,..,
o <SECTION>
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

PROJECT MANAGER ASSISTANT REGIONAL DIRECTOR REGIONAL DIRECTOR
<CONTRACTOR NAME>
DATE DATE DATE
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the Regional Office (for Design and Build Projects)
IAnnex "B -15" I

<ADDRESS>
~
Q.
....,
o Q.
o
.,
Q.
:5
.,
Q.
.•..o :5
C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT .•..o
., .,
.,
0>
"0
DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN (DESIGN AND BUILD) FOR .,
0>
"0
E
<NAME OF PROJECT> o
.l:
E E
E E
o
..., <SECTION> It)
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

<CONTRACTOR NAME> TECHNICAL SERVICES TECHNICAL SERVICES
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office (for Design and BuRd Projects)
IAnnex "B - 16"1

<UPMO CLUSTER>
<ADDRESS>
...
Ol ...
Q. Ol
o Q.
o
Q.
Q.
Ol
:5 ••
:5
'0 C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT .•..o
Ol
Ol
'"
'0
Ol DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN (DESIGN AND BUILD) FOR '"••
'0
E E
o
J: <NAME OF PROJECT> o
J:
E E
E
,.,
o <SECTION> E
0{)
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
___ -..t:OIimocfOlll~.9QI.R~_li_
lIIE~OFHEDETMlttI_CIiia:lN1MJlK
~QFTHf-STllUC!'Ulll!IIlIIbI"!C:TfoQFT>E .N.M
__ 1JJHIJr''I1tE~a<rtn'.
'IIlII'1X)ImMC'JOII_l.HBllF\,UY~oao'l1tElJTI'I.IC'TII _
_ -CT~QE_~DO.IElO"""lY_
~1l!DIIIOIt_lII"!CII'Dt_ucvrroA~O\O.NlIa~
wrrtIOUrlMriCXWOlllr.YOF"JH!Cl.:IIfTM(:T(:l
~-
-

<CONTRACTOR NAME> <UPMO CLUSTER> TECHNICAL SERVICES TECHNICAL SERVICES
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Contractor, checkBd and recommended by the concerned UPMO Cluster and approved at the Central Office (for Design and Build Projects)
IAnnex we _ 1"1
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES style"-

H=6.4Omm ( TextHelght=6.4Omm
)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS style. _ Bold )
:=J
H=9.00mm ( TextHeIght-9.00mm
<REGIONAL OFFICE No.> style=-

H= 7.8Omm ( Text HeIght. 7.60mm
)

<ADDRESS> style = Arial
H=6.4Omm ( TextHelght'6.4Omm
)
~
"
a-
a
~
a-
a- a
a-
"
:5 Q)
:5
'0 C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT H=6.4Omm
Style'-
( Text Heig/1I= 6.40mm
)
'0
"'"
"0
liAS-STAKED" PLAN FOR style'Aria! )
Q)
'"E H=6.4Omm ( Text HeIght = 6.40mm '"

"0
Q)
o E
J::
<NAME OF PROJECT> H-8.00mm
style- Ariel Bold
( TextHeig/1l=6.00mm
) a
J::
E
E
<SECTION> III
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS> H-6.00mm
style=-
( TextHelght-6.00mm
)
<NET LENGTH>
I H=3.0mm UZ:~~·3.00mm)
Style, Mol Bokl
H=4.4Omm ( TextHeig/1l-4.4Omm
) SlyIe'MoI
H=3.00mm ( Text Height. 3.00rnm
)
PREPARED: REVIEWEDAND SUBMITTED: RECOMMENDED: APPROVED:

PROJECTMANAGER CHIEF. <IMPLEMENTINGSECTION> CHIEF, PLANNINGAND DESIGNSECTION ASSISTANTDISTRICTENGINEER DISTRICTENGINEER
<CONTRACTORNAME>
DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE H=2.5Omm
Style Aria! )
( Text Heigtw. 2.5Omm
"As-Staked" Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the District Engineering Office
IAnnex we _ 2"1

~
<ADDRESS>
" ~
0.
0
0.
••
0.
0
0.
"
:S ••
:5
"
Cll
liAS-STAKED" PLAN FOR ••

"" Cll
"••
E
0
~ <NAME OF PROJECT> E
0
E
~
E E
~ <SECTION> E
~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
PREPARED: REVIEWED AND SUBMITTED: RECOMMENDED: APPROVED:
<SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNA~> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE>

<NAME> <NAME> <NAME> <NAME> <NAME> <NAME>
PROJECT MANAGER CHIEF, <IMPLEMENTING SECTION> CHIEF, PlANNING AND DESIGN SECTION DISTRICT ENGINEER ASSISTANT REGIONAL DIRECTOR REGIONAL DIRECTOR
<CONTRACTOR NAME>
·As-Staked" Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the District Engineering Office and approved by the concerned Regional Office
IAnnex we - 3"1

<ADDRESS>
....,
0-
0
.,...
0-
.,
0- 0
0-
••
:S :S
.•..0 .•..0
..,.,'" liAS-STAKED" PLAN FOR ..,••'"
E
••
0 E
./::
E
E
E
~ <SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
<SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNAnJRE> <SIGNATURE>

PROJECT MANAGER CHIEF, <IMPLEMENTING DIVISION> CHIEF, PLANNING AND DESIGN DIVISION ASSISTANT REGIONAL DIRECTOR REGIONAL DIRECTOR
<CONTRACTOR NAME>
ffAs-StakedffPlan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the Regional Office

IAnnex "C - 4"1

<ADDRESS>
~
Q.
0
.,
•..
Q.
0
.,
Q.
:5
Q.
••
:5
'" ••
.,'"
"0 "AS-STAKED" PLAN FOR '"••
"0
E E
,g <NAME OF PROJECT> 0
J:
E E
E E
0
'" <SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
PREPARED: SUBMITTED: RECOMMENDED: APPROVED:
<SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE>

PROJECT MANAGER CHIEF, <IMPLEMENTING DIVISION> REGIONAL DIRECTOR DIRECTOR IV, BUREAU OF DESIGN ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNOERSECRETARYFOR
·As-Staked· Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex"C - 5"1

<UPMO CLUSTER>
<ADDRESS>
... ...
••
Q. ••
Q.
<>
Q. <>
Q.
••
:5 ••
:5
.•...
'0 C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT 0
•• ••
'"'"•• "AS-STAKED" PLAN FOR '"••
'0
E
~ <NAME OF PROJECT> ~0
E E
E E
0
", <SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT DIRECTOR DIRECTOR N, BUREAU OF DESIGN ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
<CONTRACTOR NAME> <UPMO CLUSTER> <UPMO CLUSTER> TECHNICAL SERVICES TECHNICAL SERVICES
DAl1' DAl1' DAl1' DAl1' DAl1' DAl1'
"As-Staked" Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked by the concerned UPMO Cluster and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex "C - 6"1

<UPMO CLUSTER>
<ADDRESS>
...
Q) ...
Q)
C- c-
o o
c- c-
Q) Q)
:5 :5
..,••
Q)
0>
'0
Q) "AS-STAKED" PLAN FOR 0>
Q)
E E
o
J::
E E
E E
...,
o
<SECTION> It)
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT DIRECTOR DIRECTOR IV, BUREAU OF DESIGN ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
<CONTRACTOR NAME> <CONSRUCTION SUPERVISION CONSULTANT> <UPMO CLUSTER> TECHNICAL SERVICES TECHNICAL SERVICES
'As-Staked" Plan for UPMO implemented projects with Construction Supervision Consultant. prepared by the Contractor, checked by the Consultant,
15mm from edge of the poper checked and recommended by UPMO, and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex "0 - 1"1

R=28.0mm
R-25.0mm
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES S\yIe.Aria!

H-6.4Omm ( TextHeight=6.40mm
)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS H-9.00mm

S\yIe - Arial Bold
( TextHeight=9.00mm
)
<REGIONAL OFFICE No.> ~ S\yIe = Artol

H-7.8Omm ( Text Height = 7.8Omm
)

<ADDRESS> _ (S\yIe=Aria! )
.,
•...
0-
H-6.4Omm TextHeight=6.40mm
.,
•...
0-
.,
o
0-
:5
o
.,
0-
:5
'0
C>
C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT S\yIe • Ariel
H-6.4Omm ( TextHeight=6.40mm
)
.,
'0
en
~ REVISED PLAN FOR S\yIe = Ariel
H-6.4Omm ( TextHeight=6.4Omm
)
.,
en
'0
E E
~o <NAME OF PROJECT> S\yIe = Artel Bold
H-8.0Omm ( Text Height. 6.00mm
)
~o
E
E
<SECTION> on
<LOCATION>
Style - Arial )
<STATION LIMITS> H-6.0Omm ( Text~'6.00mm
<NET LENGTH>
I H=3.0mm (
S\jIIe=_
TOldHe;ght-3.00mm
)
H-4.40mm
Style- Anol Bold
( TextHeight-4.4Omm
) StyIe'Ariol
H=3.00mm ( Text Height. 3.0Qmm
)
PREPARED: REVIEWEDAND SUBMITTED: RECOMMENDED: APPROVED:

PROJECTMANAGER CHIEF,<IMPLEMENTINGSECTION> CHIEF, PLANNINGAND DESIGNSECTION ASSISTANTDISTRICTENGINEER DISTRICTENGINEER
<CONTRACTORNAME>
DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE H-2.5Omm
Style Ariel )
( Text Height:= 2.5Omm
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the District Engineering Office
IAnnex RD - 2"1

<ADDRESS>
...
tl ...
Q)
0- 0-
"
0-
tl
"
0-
Q)
:5 :5
~ C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT '0
"
tl
..,co
tl REVISED PLAN FOR
Q)
..,co
Q)
E E
.g <NAME OF PROJECT> "
.to
E E
E
~ <SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
_1O''' •••
1lU
'0I'_1lI
~l
•••
-.cT1:lIIJO
_
_
1'l:l_~Of
_ ••n.
__
"-"_Af"'"
~HXJIWIQtA __
_,
__ __ ~~lfS~ TI>IS_llU.loIO< __ ••••••• _....,rv _
I H=3.Omm (=~1=3.00mm) H=4.4Omm (

Style=ArlalBoid
TextHeighI=4.4Omm
)
H=3.00mm (
Style=ArlaI
Text Height = 3.QOnwn
)

PROJECT MANAGER CHIEF, <IMPlEMENTING SECTION> CHIEF, PlANNING AND DESIGN SECTION ASSISTANT DISTRICT ENGINEER DISTRICT ENGINEER
<CONTRACTOR NAME>
DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE H=2.5Omm
Style -Ariel )
( Text Height. == 2.5Qmm
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor, concurred by the Design Consultant and approved by the District Engineering Office
IAnnex "0 - 3"1

<ADDRESS>
•..
I>
0-
•...,
0 0-
0-
I>
:S
.,
0
0-
.•. C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT

:S
0
I> .,
'0
0>
"0
I> REVISED PLAN FOR .,
0>
"0
§ E
J: <NAME OF PROJECT> 0
J:
E E
E E
0
'" <SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

PROJECT MANAGER CHIEF, <IMPLEMENTING SECTION> CHIEF, PLANNING AND DESIGN SECTION DISTRICT ENGINEER ASSISTANT REGIONAl DIRECTOR REGIONAL DIRECTOR
<CONTRACTOR NAME>
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor. checked and recommended by the District Engineering Office and approved by the concerned Regional Office
IAnnex "0 - 4"1

.,
L.
<ADDRESS>
0-
.,
0 L.
Q)
0-
0-
0
:5 0-
Q)
.,
'0
C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT :5
.,
0>
"0
REVISED PLAN FOR .,
'0
0>
"0
E Q)
g
E
<NAME OF PROJECT> E
0
J:
E
a E
P')
<SECTION> E
~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
- ..---_ ...~_A_
"'-,
gn ••.••__
"O
_
-..
__
10".•••' •••__
._'
.••••
••••
•
•••._OII'I!I-...r
QI' __
...,...,.·_000 .••.
OOIIlIll.T"" ••••
•••.•.
_~TOY
OHla:._ ••••
ICf __ ~_IiImrt'_
__
_
_
__
-,-
--
PREPARED; REVIEWED AND SUBMITTED: RECOMMENDED:
APPROVED:

PROJECT MANAGER CHIEF, <IMPLEMENTING SECTION>
CHIEF, PLANNING AND DESIGN SECTION DISTRICT ENGINEER
<CONTRACTOR NAME> ASSISTANT REGIONAl DIRECTOR REGIONAL DIRECTOR
DATE DATE DATE DATE
DATE
IAnnex "D - 5"1

<ADDRESS>
•.. •..
"
a.
Cl
a.
CD
a.
Cl
a.
..,;" ..,;CD
"Cll
REVISED PLAN FOR
CD
Cll
~ "0
••
E E
a
.l:: <NAME OF PROJECT> a
.j:
E E
~ E
'" <SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

<CONTRACTOR NAME>
DAlE DAlE DAlE DATE DAlE
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the Regional Office
IAnnex 80 - 6"1

<ADDRESS>
.,..
0-
..
CD
0-
.,
0
0-
:5
0
0-
CD
:5
.•. C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT
.,
0 '0
.,'"
"'tl
REVISED PLAN FOR
CD
'"
"'tl
CD
E E
0
J: <NAME OF PROJECT> 0
J:
E E
E E
,...,
0
<SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
.........,10" •.• ' ...

DU••• __
ro __
_
_
••
, __
11Q00I'
~r_...
T_IDlINoQ!;_~t«Jl
~l"'DIHIQB"'mr...-rrrr<l!ll_
,••
000.
_-..c:ntJMTO""'"
lC(IOIl_lMl
I'IODIlI::l'_~
__
_
••••lHl!IIflIIY_
_

<CONTRACTOR NAME>
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor, concurred by the Design Conslultant and approved by the Regional Office
IAnnex "0 - 7"1

<ADDRESS>
'-0.
'"
.,'-
0.
.,
0 0
0. 0.
'"
:5 :5
.•..0 .•..
C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT 0
.,
'"'"
"0
'"
REVISED PLAN FOR '".,
"0
E E
0
J:: <NAME OF PROJECT> 0
J::
E E
E E
0
'" <SECTION> :!!
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

PROJECT MANAGER CHIEF, <IMPLEMENTING DIVISION> REGIONAL DIRECTOR DIRECTOR IV, BUREAU OF DESIGN ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
DAn
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex no - 8"1

<ADDRESS>
~ ~
Q.
a
••
Q.
0
Q. Q.
••
:5 ••
:5
••
0\ ••
"•• REVISED PLAN FOR 0\
"••
E
J=
E E
E E
0
I') <SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
_'lO!TW'....- . •.••
DlT ~1JolO1 ••.•• __ 1j)_
.••• __ ""'*CIl' :lOflICE.N:CliIFOIIO. __
a-_"',__
_ •.•_--..-
' •••__ llll,l._....- __ ~_
___ OF••• ..-"..1'ClII1VQl

PROJECT MANAGER CHIEF. <IMPLEMENTING DIVISION> REGIONAL DIRECTOR DIRECTOR IV, BUREAU OF DESIGN ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor, concurred by the Design Consultant, checked and recommended by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex no - g"1

<UPMO CLUSTER>
<ADDRESS>
~
Q)
~
Q)
Q. Q.
"
Q.
Q)
"
Q.
Q)
:5 :5
Q)
••
"••'" REVISED PLAN FOR "'"
Q)
E
~ <NAME OF PROJECT> ~a
E E
0
E
<SECTION> ,g
'"
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
PREPARED: SUBMITTED; RECOMMENDED; APPROVED;

<CONTRACTOR NAME> <UPMO CLUSTER> <UPMO CLUSTER> TECHNICAl SERVICES TECHNICAL SERVICES
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the concerned UPMO Cluster and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex "0 - 10" I

<UPMO CLUSTER>
<ADDRESS>
.,a.... ...
'"
a.
".,
a.
"
a.
:5 '"
:5
'0
.,
..,'"
'"
il REVISED PLAN FOR
E
'E"
"
./::: <NAME OF PROJECT> "
./:::
E E
E E
,..,
0
<SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
Dn ~T_-...c r_''''' .•.__ T()..,.,....

'.•
c._ ..__
_fO
't(; __
___
••.•••
-.._a._<lFItlu-.r.
'''''~
TJOtIot>
' __
•••
g~~
__
__
•••••.••
__
__
111)1 ••••••
~
__
---.
__
_
"""'"'

<CONTRACTOR NAME> <UPMO CLUSTER> <UPMO CLUSTER> TECHNICAL SERVICES TECHNICAL SERVICES
DATE DATE DATE DATE
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor, concurred by the Design Consultant, checked and recommended by the concerned UPMO Cluster and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex"O - 11" I

<UPMO CLUSTER>
<ADDRESS>
~ ~
'"
0- '"
0-
"
0- "
0-
'"
:S '"
:S
'" ''""
'"
"0 REVISED PLAN FOR "0
'" '"
~ <NAME OF PROJECT> ~
E E
.5 <SECTION>
E
10
'"
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH> ___ c_.._~
_TOI
Dn
1'(>
•.•••
101'__
~
__ fl._~,_1Wof""'_*L..:!l_'"
CQoIU.T
~
__
__
TIOlI
~
Wl_JIlIl.THI
TllYMr
•• r..wr
",*"", __ T"~<ll''''~f<lfllllJ:k.
PREPARED: REVIEWED AND SUBMmED: RECOMMENDED: APPROVED:

PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT DIRECTOR DIRECTOR N, BUREAU OF DESIGN ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE DATE
Revised Plan for UPMO implemented projects with Construction Supervision Consultant, prepared by the Contractor, checked by the Consultant,
15mm from edge of the paper checked and recommended by UPMO, and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex"E - 1"1

Style- Arial
TextHelgllt-6.4Onvn
)

Style- Arial Bold
Text HeIilhI- 9.00mm
)
<REGIONAL OFFICE No.> ~ H= 7.8Omm (

StyIe=ArlaI
Text HeIght = 7.llOmm
)

StyIe-Arlai
Text~-6.4Omm
)
~
0-
"-
II>
o 0-
o
0- 0-
Il>
'"
:S :S
Style- Arial )
'0 C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT H=6.4Omm ( Text HelgIlt _ 6.4Onvn '0
'"'"
"0 liAS-BUILT" PLAN FOR H=6.4Omm (
StyIe-Arlai
Text.:i..ight _ 6.4Onvn
)
'"'"
"0
'" 'E"
~ <NAME OF PROJECT> H=8.0Omm (
Style- Arial Bold
Text HeIght = 8.00mm
)
~o
E E
E E
o
'" <SECTION> on
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS> H 6 oOm m (Style
=. = Arial
TextHeighl=6.00mm
)
<NET LENGTH>
I H=J.Omm (
Style-Arial
TextHeight-3.00mm
)
H=4.40mm (
StyIe-AriatBold
TextHeight-4.4Omm
)
H-J.OOmm (
Style = Arial
Text Height = 3.00mm
)
H-2.50mm
Style- Mol )
PREPARED: SUBMmED: RECOMMENDED: APPROVED: ( Text Hoight,=2.5Omm

PROJECT MANAGER CHIEF. <IMPLEMENTING SECTION> ASSISTANT DISTRICT ENGINEER DISTRICT ENGINEER
<CONTRACTOR NAME>
DATE DATE DATE DATE
"As-Built" Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the District Engineering Office
IAnnex"E - 2"1

<ADDRESS>
•.. •...,
••
a. a.
0 0
a. a.
••
:5
.,
:5
•• .,
••'" "AS-BUlL T" PLAN FOR ••'"
"0 "0
E E
,g <NAME OF PROJECT> a
J::
E E
E E
0
'" <SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
PREPARED: SUBMmED: RECOMMENDED: APPROVED:

PROJECT MANAGER CHIEF, <IMPLEMENTING SECTION> DISTRICT ENGINEER ASSISTANT REGIONAl DIRECTOR REGIONAl DIRECTOR
<CONTRACTOR NAME>
DATE DATE DATE
"As-Built" Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the District Engineering Office and approved by the concerned Regional Office
IAnnex liE - 3-'

<ADDRESS>
•... •...
••
Q. ••
Q.
0 0
Q.
Q.
••
:5 ••
.•.
0 C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT
:5
'0
•• ••
'"
II "AS-BUILT" PLAN FOR "'"••
E E
0
J:: <NAME OF PROJECT> 0
J::
E E
E
...,
0
<SECTION> .R
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

PROJECT MANAGER CHIEF, <IMPLEMENTING DIVISION> ASSISTANT REGIONAL DIRECTOR REGIONAL DIRECTOR
<CONTRACTOR NAME>
DATE DATE DATE DATE
'As-Builr Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the Regional Office
IAnnex"E -4"1

<ADDRESS>
ij .,...
"-
0 0-
0
"-., .,
0-
:5 :5
'0
.,
'".,
0>
"AS-BUlL T" PLAN FOR '".,
0>
E E
.g <NAME OF PROJECT> .g
E E
E E
0
'" <SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>

PROJECT MANAGER CHIEF,<IMPlEMENTING DIVISION> REGIONAL DIRECTOR ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
<CONTRACTOR NAME> REGIONAl OPERATIONS REGIONAl OPERATIONS
DATE DATE DATE DATE DA.TE
"As-Built" Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex "E - 5" I

<UPMO CLUSTER>
<ADDRESS>
.,
~
Q.
.,~
0 Q.
.,
Q. 0
Q.
.s
.•... .s••
.,
0 C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT '0
.,
.,'"
"0
"AS-BUILT" PLAN FOR .,'"
"0
E E
0
.t: <NAME OF PROJECT> g
E E
E E
0
'" <SECTION> ~
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
PREPARED: SUBMmED: RECOMMENDED: APPROVED:

PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT DIRECTOR ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
<CONTRACTOR NAME> <UPMO CLUSTER> <UPMO CLUSTER> UPMO OPERATIONS UPMO OPERATIONS
'As-Built' Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the concerned UPMO Cluster and approved at the Central Office
IAnnex "E - 6" I

<UPMO CLUSTER>
<ADDRESS>
~ ~
'"
Q.
o
••o
Q.
Q. Q.
••
:5 ••
:5
..,••
0>
"AS-BUILT" PLAN FOR ..,••
0>
•• ••
E E
£ <NAME OF PROJECT> o
ol=
E
E
,..,
o <SECTION>
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS>
<NET LENGTH>
<ROAD SECTION I BRIDGE ID> ~'IO_&.4Of_"'lWllt!_~1IlIl28

Mm __ •••..,..OFIVl.tl •• TJII1~~
<XIN9Ul.TAIll'_lllE.llEM'(NlIIL.EFOR~11CNAM)OfECMOIO(JI'
....•.
~_a.wmBOIFWCHl~frt_~
"'_""'~fVMI,-"""'~ __ OF

PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT DIRECTOR ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR
<CONTRACTOR NAME> <CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION CONSULTANT> <UPMO CLUSTER> UPMO OPERATIONS UPMO OPERATIONS
DATE DATE DATE DATE
"As-Builf' Plan for UPMO implemented projects with Construction Supervision Consultant, prepared by the Contractor, checked by the Consultant,
15mm from edge of the paper checked and recommended by UPMO, and approved at the Central Office
r- 15 mm romegeo
d f th e poper
I Annex"F - 1" I
• DliPA~ --~-~
<DISTRICT~
OF PU8UCWORKS AND .-.wAYS
•...
-"""'
..........
99.00
OFFICE>
FftO.ECfNAUE"NI:llClCllT1Olt
74.00
$o!fEfCONTENT5:
74.00
"..,.,."
PflIEPAED:
~r>
60.00
>
~"'STOIlESDtCONCf.PT·
<SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
- ~RI
52.00 I
....,.,.,.
CItEF.Pt.ANHlNGoI.NDCElIGNSECTtON
~~
52.00 I
--
.~ """'ANTDIS1llICT~
52.00 I
-.,
WiTIl:ll;TINIJIE£H
52.00 I
,."
@
..
17.00
e
I
....,..,.
17.00
.,
549.00
~
Q.
Conceptual Design Plan prepared and approved by the District Engineering Office
.,
0
•
Q.
.,
0
-, -.,. •.....,.
.,'" PROJl!CTN.WE.IlNDtOOlo~
"""'''''''''''''
--~~---. R£W!W£OAS TOORlQtI ~
- "'''''
e
<LOGOIS>
-
<SIGNA'lllli,W ••••UE> DEPAR11IEVr OF PUIIUC WORKS AND HlGtMAY8
•...
-"""'
E
0
E
<CONSUL TANTIS>
<SIGNA-",~E>
.........
<DISTRICTENGINEERINGOfACE> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
QlIl!F.f'lANoIlNGNoDDEIlIGNsecnow
~n
ASSISTAN'l"llISrRlC1~eR
~n
OBTRICTI~ @
E
o 58.00 I 58.00 I 74.00 I 74.00 99.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 17.00 17.00
'" 549.00
L Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Consultant and approved by the District Engineering Office
• _~_"LP'~
fIM).leCT~ANDLOCA'Jk»t
"""'- """""'" -, ...-.0, -- """""" "'''''
....,..,.
09AR1'IIeNTOf PU8UC WORIUJAND HIOtfW'AVS
.......•. """' •...
95.00
-
<OIST1llCTENGINEERINGOFFICE>
60.00 80.00
~~
52.00
<SIGNATURE
~~
52.00
OVER NAME>
aftt,I'I..MoNNO»IDDEa:lIlI!IECTION
~~
~.PL,OlIIlNllOIGAMlCUll;lNOIIlllIOIC
52.00 I
~~
DIlITR1CTEffClMEER
52.00 I
~~
REGIOIIII\i.I»lECTlJR
52.00
@
I 17.00
e
I 17.00
549.00
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the District Engineering Office and approved by the Regional Office
<LOGOIS>
<CONSUL TANTIS>
55.00 I
-,
""'""'"
<SIGNA~R
<SlG~~E>
58.00
NAUE>
I
PROlECT~.t.HDLOCAT1ON·
71.50 I
"""-
11.50 I
~=-==::=~Y1
-
.-
<OlSTRCT~OfFICE>
53.00 I
RtVIEWEDASTODESl3HCONCePT:

CHEF.~NU»ID~8I:t;11UoI
52.00 I
cttI'.~ANDIJESIONIMIKN
52.00
--
Dlll:iTI(1CI~1III
52.00
"""""".

ReQCJlW.LWlELTOH
52.00
@
"'''''
17.00
e
....,..,.
17:00
549.00
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Consultant, checked and recommended by the District Engineering Office and approved by the Regional Office
L- 15mm from ed 9 e of the PQ Per

r- 15 mm romegeo
d f th e paper
I Annex"F - 2" I
•--~---DeP~ OF PU8UC WOIUCS AND HIGHWAYS
<REGIOl'W.OfFICE No.>
....•.......
99.00
PAOJE<lTNAJ.EANDl.OCA1Pf:
74.00 I
'-';ET~NTS:
74.00 I
_
"""""
~1lWE>
.
60.00
>
-
~~
cteEF,~1JelIOtt8ECTlClN>
52.00
....".,
<SIGNAlURE
CHEF. P\NNItG
~~
.
OVER NAME>
AIG DE8QtI C1'JI8IOH
52.00 I
-
.....-
<SIGNA lURE OVER NAME.
MlAlrM1R!:~~
52.00 I
-
<SIGNA lURE OVER NAME.
~~
REGION\l.lllREC1tIR
52.00
@8
I
"''''
17.00 I
,"",NO.
17.00
549.00
.,
'-
Q.
0 Conceptual Design Plan prepared and approved by the Regional Office
.,
Q.
_.
:5
.,
0
'"
E
<lOOOlS>
<SIGNA~NAUE>
PROJECT,IjAtM;.AltDLOCAl1l:*,
"""""""""
e I\fNlE.'Wa) M TO DEaDf CONCEPT;
-- - "'''' '"""NO.
0
E
<CONSUL TANTIS>
"",,",D
•••••••• ,~UE>
~~"::-===~d .........
<AEOICW.LOFACEltI>
<SIGNAlURE
QtI~f,~UIJelllO"~
OVER NAME. <SIGNATURE OVER NAME.
OIEl',I'Vo-..GANDUESllJIICl/1IICN
<SIGNATURE OVER NAME.
AIIIllST....,.~~'t.-.
<SlGNATtRE OVER
R~DflECTOI'I
NAME>
@8
E
o
I') 55.00 I 56.00 I 71.50 I 71.50 I 53.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 17.00 I 17.00
L
549.00
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Consultant and approved by the Regional Office
•-~~--DEPARTIIENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIlJHWAYS
.......,.
<REGIOl'W.OFFCENo>
95.00
PJIOJECTIoIAUEANDLOC'AnoN:
52.50
'""""""""'"
52.50
PREPARED;
"""'"'"
-'W
55.00
NAME
'
>
""""'"
M~ """""~-
52.00
_.
<SlGNAlURE
~~
OVER NAME>
IIEOIONI\LDIR£ClOfI
52.00
M~
(SEE COVER SHEET)
<NAME>
~ORr\I>IIIJREAllIJl"CIl:.lIU\l
52.00
M~
(SEE CCNER SHEET)
~~RR
<NAME>
52.00
_.
-
(SEE COVER SHEET)
<NAME>
\IMlUI5HA1I:lMYKM
""'""'-----
52.00
@8
"''''
17.00
'""'NO.
17.00
549.00
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Regional Office, checked and approved at the Central Office
<tOGOIS>
PREPARED: PROJECTNAMEAHOt.OCATtON: ...•. - e ,- RIMIiWEl)ASlOOESlGN~;
""""'""'"
•...... "'''' ,"""NO.
-.•.••....
(SEE COVER SHEET) (SEE COVER SHEET) (SEE C<NER SHEET)
..-
..-mo.
....-...""'"... @ 8
REf'\,A1LI::OI'nE~
••••.•~Ol'....-uc'llflDltaMD~ <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
<CONSUlTANTfS>
> ....•....... DIItI',~ANlDElICiINcv.-..
....•.•.~......
1HEF.~DESlGNOI\/I!IION> REGIIOIW.DI*:CTlJR ~OR'MtDPtlBiIIGlt All5I$T~r
""'""'-......,..
.•tn'FOfl ~~
50.00 I 50.00 I 45.00 I 45.00 I 53.00 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 45.34 I 17.00 I 17.00
549.00
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Consultant, checked and recommended by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office
L- 15mm from ed9 e of the PoPer

r-- 15mm romegeo d f th e poper
I Annex"F - 3" I
• DeP~ ~~--~~OF PUBUCWORKI
<\JPMOCLUSTER>
"""'""""
95.00
AND HICIHWA'R
PROJ£CTNAMENIlJLl'JCfIJ1QN:
I 52.50 I
SliE1:TCCWTENf$:
52.50 I
_0
--- <.~~
55.00
••••••••
..
"".....,
ctEf'.~~DIVJ8lON>o
"'"E'''''''''''''''
52.00
.............,
.....,a.us_
I'IlWeUfDIRECTCR
52.00
(SEE COYER SHEET)
<NAME>
52.00
(SEE COVER stEET)
<NAME>
~ANlSECRElN'rr~
m>HCN.••••••••
52.00
-(SEE COVER SHEET)
<NAME>
I.NlERSECRETARVFOR
""" •.... """"'"

52.00
@
"''''
17.00
e
'-NO.
17.00
.,...
549.00
a. Conceptual Design Plan prepared by UPMO, checked and approved at the Central Office
.,
0
Q.
.,
0
.,
co
.•. """" PftOJECTIWoIE1MOLOCATlON:
"""- """"'" ~AS'JODI!SlGNOONCI!PT; ,,~ I-- "'''' '-NO.
tit
e
<LOOOlS>
E (SEE COVER stEEl) (SEE COVER SHEET) (SEE CCNER SHEET)
e
E
<CONSULTANTlS>
"""""",.
IllY'I..eI..J::OFTHE~
~-o.."""'::_AND""'"
....,""""'"
""""""""
F'I'Itl.ECTUOIWIGl'R
c$IGNATURE
atlEF.~==~
OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE
"::~
OVER NAME>
-<~,.~"""" MISIT~.ynf'lJR
1».11!'~SERV1:E8 Illt.TF
~.Q",~
~8ElMC1!S
@
E
o
'" 50.00 I 50.00 I 45.00 I 45.00 53.00 45.33 45.33 45.33 45.33 45.33 45.34 17.00 17.00
L
549.00
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Consultant, checked and recommended by UPMO and approved at the Central Office
•-~-~ DEP~
~AO::)
Of PUBLK: WORKS ANO HIGHWAYS
BUREAU OF DeSIGN
<CONCERr.ED1lMSION>
DlWE. PORT AAEA,1oWIIlA
99.00
PRO.E'CTNAMEf1H)lOCA11l:iN:
74.00
8HEETCONTENTS:
74.00
_.
"""""
~~r'E>
~r.g>
60.00
""""""
~~
ctIEF.~~~
52.00
..-me
~~
(SEE COVER SHEET)
~
<NAME>
••••,~!Jf~
52.00 I
--
(SEE COVER SHEET)
~~ -........ -
<NAME>
l\&IIIGA""RCllliTNn'l'l;R
52.00 I
-(SEE COVER SHEET)
~IMI'fOR
<NAME>
"""""'
52.00
........ @
I
"''''
17.00 I
e
....,NO.
17.00
549.00
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Bureau of Design
<LOoolS>
<CONT~TORJS>
56.00 I
.......... ,
....."'"
<SlGNA~NAUE>
<SIG"H,WW'UE>
56.00 I
PROJECTNJ.UEH«)L0C4TICtI'
74.00 I
'""''''''''''''
74.00 I
•~~~-- DEPARTIIeNT OF PUllUCWORKS
4lEBIOroW.OFfJCEIfD.>
<lllS111ICTE~NG
99.00
AND HIGHWAY'S
OFfiCE>
I
..-...
GttEF.~INBIUA)a:wJM-';IJ;JN
52.00 I
--
A551iT_IDli!I'lI'\,.'~ER
52.00 I
_.
[ETJU;TII~
52.00
@
I
""'"
17.00 I
e
.-NO
17.00
549.00
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the District Engineering Office
(for Design and Build Projects)
L- 15mm from edge of the poper

r-- 15mm fr om edge 0f th e poper
I Annex"F - 4" I
........, ~IUMEAMDl.OCo\11ON:
"""""""'"'
e ""'""'" """"""'" - "''''' ....".,.
e
<LOGO/S>
--
<SIGN.\~R ••••••.•
~~~~~"
@
-
<SIGNAlURE OVER NAME> <SIGNAlURE OVER NAME> <SIGNAlURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
<CONTRACTOR/S>
- --
.umrr:TlNOtlE~OFf'lC£> Q'W',f'l.AllrNHGNlDDESIiIJj~ CI'E'.I'lJ\NIIlNJAlllPDIlSlGN~ DlJflnCI~ IlE(lIONN..~CfDIII
66.00 I 66.00 71.50 I 11.50 I 53.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 I 17.00 I 17.00
549.00
a;
Co
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the District Engineering Office and approved by the concerned Regional Office
.,
0
_
Co
.,
0
.,
01 .
I'RQlI!CT!<lI\loEANDL.ClC.'TION IllEETCONl'E!NT&:
tit
........,
-- """""" "''''' ......".,.
e
<LOGOIS>
E <SIGNA~V NAU&
e
E
E
<CONTRACTORIS> """'"'"
~~M'"
p..un-.n OF..-.: ••••
P:I!!PUIUC0l' 1'HE PHIJ'PWE$
-""""
- •...
AoNO
••••• <SIGNAlURE OVER NAME>
Ct'IEF,~IUGDESilt8l1ClJCN
<SIGNA lURE OVER NAME>
--
g; •••.•~AJrIC~tN'MCIN
-
A8EJ1T~I'E(lII[JfW.~IUH
<SIGNATURE
--
~DIIECfO'l
OVER NAME>
@
o
I') 55.00 I 66.00 I 71.50 I 11.50 53.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 I 17.00 I 17.00
L
549.00
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the Regional Office
.."""",. !'ROJ£CTNoWE~l..OCATION -
...•..
tit
CHECKED: ~ """""""', "''''' ...•.. '"
e
<I.OGOIS>
< > (SEE COVER SHEET) (SEE COVER SHEET) """'- (SEE CCNER SHEET)
~ICOFntEl'HU'I'IfE$
@
-
.-mo,
-
Of !"talC Wl:IllCIAMJ •••••• <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME,.
~?R,,,,,,
<CONTRACT~
< > -"""' •...
-
[;t1U',P\.ANIIINOo\JDDEllIGNIW&:lN
...............
QoIEF.~DE!lKlNDNlI!ION>
<SIGNA~~:QfINAME>
I)MU;rOl'l~CWDa8ON .....,.~~~""f'OW
"""""'''''''''''' TEt't/NOri, SE!WCES
50.00 50.00 45.00 I 45.00 I 53.00 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 45.33 45.34 17.00 17.00
549.00
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office
.. ....,-
"""'" PROJIECT*ME1III£JlOCA~'
e........ '''''''''" ..,.",. .""""""'" ~ "''''' ....,"'.

e
<lOGOl5>
(SEE COVER StEEn (SEE COVER SHEET) (SEE COV'ER SHEET)
,,=1~ .. @
~r...~
""","",' _~~~Y""'A <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OYER NAME:> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
<CO~ORIS> """ .........
- PROJECTIMfIIWEH Oftf.~UI.1ll!:IIQN~
""~ 8lJflIEMIlN'DBlIlliN
~1l1R"'OI'lJliSQN Mi8IIJT~.un'RM
""""'" ....••. """"""' """"
50.00 50.00 45.00 45.00 53.00 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 45.34 17.00 17.00
549.00
Conceptual Design Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the concerned UPMO Cluster and approved at the Central Office
L- 15mm from edge of the paper

r- 15 mm fr om edge 0f th e poper
I Annex"G - 1" I
• DEPAwn.NTOF ~~--~
PU8UC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
~omcr'*"~
-
<OISTRICTENGIEERING OffICE>
99.00 I
PAClJECTNAMEAIC)lOCll'OON:
74.00 I
!lHEETCONl1::NTS,
74.00 I
""""',
"""""",,
~~>
60.00
>
I
....•.....
~~
ENQIoIS:RI
52.00 I
......"",
ctlEF.f'LAN4IN1jAMJIJI35IliN8EClIJN
52.00 I
""""""""

ASWJTANTOI5l1l:lCT~ER
52.00 I
-,
DBTRICT
52.00
INOWEBl @
I
""'"
17.00
e
I
"""'NO.
17.00
549.00
~
••
Q.
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared and approved by the District Engineering Office
"
Q.
•~~---
••
:S
0
..,••'" .. --..n,
•• -- f'ftOdECTNo\I.E.NelOCA'f1ON: liN!ETCONl'Bf'J$: ~ """""'" ""'"
....,NO.
e
<LOGOIS>
E <SIGNA.T~NA"& DePARl1IIeNT Of PUBUCWOItK8 AND HIGHWAYS
o
@
«EGll)W.OFFICENov
J::
"*""" ..........
<llISTFIlCTENGtlEERlNGOffICE> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <StGNA.TURE OVER NAME>
o
E
E -
<CONSUl. TNolTIS> ~F, f'1.JI.II'QoKiNolOmBl3Wl£ClION AmIIITNfTIlETRlCTEMl»EER CII!I-m!l:TENQIlt£I;.I(
I') 56.00 I 5ll.00 I 74.00 I 74.00 I 99.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 52.00 I 17.00 I 17.00
L
549.00
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Consultant and approved by the District Engineering Office
• DEPARTIIENT ~~-~
OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
..•••....
95.00
"""'"
..........
<llIS1RICTENGIEERlNG OfFICE>
PROJECTNAUEANO~1IOIot
60.00
"""""""'"
60.00
PR:EPAREO;
<StGNATURE
~Il
52.00
OVER NAME>
......"",
ctIU'.Pl.AfNNlJNmDE8lJlN~
52.00
...-.,
CMEf",~AND_UIIIlIalIf
52.00
--
DllinllCf~
52.00
""A'M'"
1tOIOtW.~"'UIf
52.00
@
""'"
17.00
e
•••••
17.00
NO.
549.00
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the District Engineering Office and approved by the concerned Regional Office
-, PItOIECT 'WEAHO LOCUDl 8HEE1'CONl'ENT8:
e ........" ..........,.. """""'" "" .. ••••• NO.
e
<LOGO1$>
<SIGNA~NAUE>
-~
<CONSUl TANTIS>
"""'"""
<S""'~UE>
AI!PIJl!lLlCOl'ntE~
liIP.unwsn::.-:O::'AIlO
.......••.
<f:lI8'I"RI:'Tt~OfFlCE'
••••••. Yl <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
CHI&,
~~
PlJUrHNa AND DEIlIiIN liI:CllCtI
~~
OEF.Pl.AlNNGAND~1M8JN
~~
DllJJRICTENGNEER
~~
REGK»W.OR;:[;T(JR @
55.00 55.00 71.50 71.50 53.00 52.00 52.00 I 52.00 52.00 17.00 17.00
549.00
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Consultant, checked and recommended by the District Engineering Office and approved by the concerned Regional Office
L-- 15mm from ed9 e of the PoPer

r- 15 mm romegeo
d f th e poper
I Annex "G - 2" I
•--~--DePARTIII!!NT Of PUBLIC WORKS AND HIOIIWAYI
-
<REGIOIW.OFFICENo.>
99.00 I
PROJECTIWEN«ltOCATDt:
74.00 I
!lHi:ETCOIfI1!:IITS:
74.00
_.
0•• ",,,
~1Ir>
<SIGNA~NAME>
60.00
.........,
CMEF,~DDEBQNlJECT1CNl>
52.00
..wm;o·

CHIEI',P\ANNlHQANOCIB:JN~
52.00
--
AS5l8T1WTflBJKltW.ClRECTOlt
52.00
-
REGIlltW-DlRECTOft
52.00
@
""'"
17.00
e
,"""NO.
17.00
549.00
~
"
0-
0 Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared and approved by the Regional Office
0-
"
0
"
0>
"" <tOOO/S>
_. PAQlEC'tNAAiENflJ!,.OCATJCItI: Sl£ETCONY~
It - -- _. .•"'" ....".,.
E
e
<SIGNA~~RNAME>
0
~ ~~~..:::=- @
-
<SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNA 1\JRE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
<CONSUL TANTIS> <AEGDW.CJI'RCE ~. ~,PI.NHIfONlDDEtIlQN&a:11ON CIOI1f,R.ANMI«lANDOOSlQIII~ ABlnTNfT~~I~ REI;llOIoIf<L.Dll'ECTOR
E
E
<SIG",~& ~~ ~~ ~~ ~=
o
'" 55.00 56.00 71.SO 71.50 53.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 I 17.00 I 17.00
L
549.00
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Consultant and approved by the Regional Office
•-~~--DePART'IIeNT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGIHWAY1I
-.
<REGlOtW. OFFK:E No,>
95.00
PAOJECTNAMElMllOCAl1ON:
52.SO
IlI£eTCCNTENrS:
52.50
...•.....••.
<"""""WNAME>
SUlIIo!lTTI!o:
55.00
>
""""'"

CHEF.cCONCI!RNEDOEaQN~
BlJAEAUOFOEEN
52.00
...,"""""'"
~~
1lEGDrW.~0P:
52.00
~~
(SEE COVER SHEET)
<NAME>
DIIleCTORIV.~Cf'~
52.00
(SEE COVER SHEET)
<NAME>
ASSIBTMfl'I;IB;IIETNfI'f'afI
~~ ""'"""""""'"
52.00
"""""'"
~~
(SEE COVER SHEET)
<NAME>
"""""'
52.00
....
UNDERSECAETARY' fOlIl
"""
@
"'''''
17.00
e
....,"'.
17.00
549.00
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office
"'''''''''' "'AOJECTPWoCEAt«>LOC#\TlON"
'""""'"""'"
It .•...•
CHEC*ED:
"""""" .. """"""" ~ "''''' '"""'"
e
<lOGO/S>
< > (SEE COVER St£ET) (SEE COVER SHEET) (SEE COlER SHEET)
<CON~TIS>
"""""".
< >
lO'.,.....,~...::c~
~OFflCENlIo.~
"""""'"
<SIGNATURE
cttEI',~NWJ_DII'&:JN
~
OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
QtEf,
........,~""""
<OONCaMW DUIQN IWIlICN>
<StGNATURE
~~CllJll'l
OVER NAME::-
UI'II:~'Qlf1SOt"DIliIIlGIt
~w
"""~~"'"
~~-""""'" I~=
~m.."",
"""""".....,..
@
SO.OO SO.OO 45.00 45.00 53.00 45.33 45.33 45.33 45.33 45.33 46.34 17.00 17.00
549.00
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Consultant, checked and recommended by the Regional Office and approved at the
Central Office
L- 15mm from ed9e 0f the paper

r-- 15mm romegeo
d f th e paper
I Annex"G - 3" I
•~~--- DePARTlImn' OF PUBLIC
<UPMOClUSTER>
95.00
...........
WORKS AND tDfWAYI
PIlOSECT/IlAWi:~lOQ\ltON:
I 52.50
&£ET CCNTEKTS:
52.SO I
..•....•
"""'"'"'
<81GNA:MIM
55.00
hWoIE"
>
I
.......",
~, I!UREAUOFDESIGN
52.00 I
-
~~ ....""""",
<SIGNA lURE OVER NAME>
PftOJECTDIlECroR
52.00 I
~~
(SEE COVER SHEET)
<NAME>
~Q'I"'.alRe'AUDFDe8IUN
52.00 I
~~
(SEE Co.tER SHEET)
-.......,..
<NAME>
.-.sl!II5TANTIIECIl:ETNn'FCil
52.00 I
-,
(SEE COVER SHEET)
<NAME>
\NJIiRlll:CftlTARY ~OR
""'"''''''''''''''''
52.00
@8
I
"' ...
11.00 I
-StlERNO.
11.00
549.00
~
"
0.
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the concerned UPMO Cluster and approved at the Central Office
"
0.
"
:5
0
"'"
"E <1..00015>
....•....•• "fk>JECT,.,.ANOlOCATlON
....,""""""
It
CHfCllED:
""""'" ..- (SEE COVER StEEl) (SEE COVER SHEET)
•..•...
(SEE COlER SHEET)
"' ... ...., •..
e
E
<CONSUlTANTIS:>
""""",,, ~~..:.;e.:::=~
..••...........
"""""
<SIGNATURE
~~
OVER NAME>
I'ftO.E:CTw.NJI.GDl
....•...~......
a.IEF·.~.....-..c:n..EDDE:IAOH~
<SIGNATURE
~~
OVER NAME>
~~0I"0B;lIQI\I
~~RM
~= @8
E
,..,
o
50.00 I SO.OO I 45.00 I 45.00 I 53.00 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.34 I 11.00 I 11.00
L
549.00
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Consultant, checked and recommended by the concerned UPMO Cluster and approved at the Central Office
•~~--- DEPARTMENT OF
~AClODfWE.
PUBUC WORKS AND tlQlfWAYS
BUREAU Of DESIGN
<CONCERt.EDIlIVISIOO>
99.00
PORTJJlEA,IWaA
PROJECT NAUENCI LDCATDt
14.00
8tEElCONTEHT'S'
14.00
PflEl'AAED:
""""".
~~>
~~>
60.00
-
<SIGNATURE
"""""~
52.00
OVER NAME>
..•..
CIfioF.~uoeBlONlll'tI16IIJJP
"""""'"
(SEE COVER SHEET)
~IUMIV,~UI'~
<NAME>
52.00
-
Mn
(SEE COVER SHEET)
<NAME>
_l_'~'AIn'~~
-"""""
52.00
_.
(SEE COVER SHEET)
Mn
<NAME>
~:::.c":
52.00
@8
"' ...
11.00
........
11.00
549.00
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Bureau of Design
<lOGOlS>
<CONTRACTOR/&-
56.00
I'\IlEPARED:
•••••mo
<SIGNA~NAUE>
<SIG~UE>
58.00
l'ftOJECt,....t.EANDlOCATION:
14.00
StEeT COh"TEHJS:
14.00
• DEPARllIENT ~~-- _
Of PUBUC WORK8 AND HIGHWAYS
4tEQlCHIJ.OFfJC£No.>
<DIS1RICTENGINEERING
..••..•••.
OFFICE>
99.00
<SIGNATURE
~~
.
OVER NAME>
CIIEl',f'LAN'INOANDDlCtiKiNIif;CIIJN
52.00
""""""'"
-
~lNfTDI5IR1C1ENQlN15eR
52.00
-
<SIGNA TlRE OVER NAME>
~n
OIITRICllNGHllII:
52.00
@8
"' ...
11.00
....."'.
11.00
549.00
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the District Engineering Office
L- 15mm from ed9 e of the pop er

r- 15mm romegeo
d f th e paper
I Annex"G - 4" I
_ .
I'llO..IECTJ<lAWNfDlOCATlON· ...... - e ......... --. """""", '"''''' ".""0.
- ---
<LOOOIS>
-~WOWlE>
~"::'=:=--T1
•.. <SIGNAlURE OVER NAME> <SIGNA lURE OVER NAME> <SIGNA lURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
@8
-
<CONTRACTORIS>
55.00 I
<S~E>
66.00 71.50 71.50

.••..••..
~lNON!afNGOf'f1C£>o
53.00
cnIt".~NfDCtiR;;JrltM:l1DN
52.00 I
OIif.I'\AIIIIlNGANDIlIi8iftDVllACN
52.00 I
lJRITKICTENGIIEER
52.00 I
.- REGIONN.lMECTDR
52.00 I 17.00 I 17.00
549.00
.,
•..
Q.
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the District Engineering Office and approved by the concerned Regional Office
.,
0
Q.
:5
.,
0
'"., <LOGOIS>
........", Pl'lOJECTIVIMENfDlOCo\T1ON SHEeTCONTaITS:
e .•..•..•.
- """""'" "'''''
....,.•.
-
E <SJGHA~W NAME>
e ~"':":~
.••..••.."v
__ Yl
<SlGNAruRE OVER NAME> <SIGNAlURE OVER NAME> <SlGNAlURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE
~~ OVER NAME>
@8
--
<CONTRACTORIs> cIl£GiICN,O,I. OFRCE O4I>F,,,,,,,*-NmDE8lQNSECTICN Ctl£F,Pl.ANNNIlAM:IIl£SlOltDVl8:lN A881T~~~~
E
E
o I I
'" 55.00 I 66.00 I 71.50 71.50 53.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 17.00 17.00
549.00
L Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the Regional Office
_ .
PRO.lECTJWE/>MIJl.OCATlQN
...,""""'"
e """"'" ....-. - """"'" "''''' ....,"'.
-,
<LooOlS>
(SEE COVER StEET) (SEE COVER SHEET) (SEE co.tER SHEET)
l!I'MT1&t~~~.-.m
.••..••..
_"""'No>
<SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIG~TURE OIER NAME> ~~~NAME>
"""li!l&•••. ",,,,
"""'"" ......... ..""'" @8
-- ~"'"
CHEF.~_~D\I"" CHEF,~Doe!l1GHOMlIION> ~crOR~ClfOEBIOfI
<CONTRACTORIS>
••••_ ~Of'DSlIIlilN
""""""'
50.00 I 50.00 I 45.00 I 45.00 I 53.00 45.33 45.33 45.33 45.33 45.33 45.34 I 17.00 I 17.00
549.00
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office
<LOGOIS>
PREPAAEO ; PROJeCT NI\ME AI«) lOCATION ....,- It "''''''''
......... """"""'"
(SEE COVER St£ETJ (SEE COVER SHEET)
""""'"
(SEE COVERSHEET)
"''''' ....,NO.
<CONT~ORfS> - >
~~~..::::~.
.••..••..
",,",CWSlOR>
<SIGNATURE
-
OVER NAME>
PRWfCTM/roIW3£A
<SIGNATURE
OEI'.~DE:IIUN~
OVER NAME>
~UOf'DEIiIllN
<SIGNATURE
Mm
OVER NAME>
PfiQJ~clIllJa<l,;UJR
.....,"""""
~CIUR'B;Of"LJaIlGJf Aa!IIn'~"'"POIt
"""'"" ......... ~reCtltllQtlL_R\/ICeSi "'"
@8
50.00 I 50.00 I 45.00 45.00 I 53.00 45.33 45.33 45.33 45.33 45.33 45.34 I 17.00 I 17.00
549.00
Detailed Engineering Design Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the concemed UPMO Cluster and approved at the Central Office
Luuu .... 15mm from edge of the paper

r- 15mm romegeo
d f the paper
I Annex"H _1"
I
<LOOO/S>
........... PlK)JECTNAMEANOlOCAT1ON
......""""'"
e '"""'"
......, - """"""",. - ••• on BHEl'TNO,
.cCONTRACTQRIS>
"""""' ......•..
~~~'='""",,,\'l
GlRl:T
---,.,
--
EHONERtfGOOU;>
I'flCIJE:T9IIJNER
~,4IP'I.DIIiNlINQss;naM>-
QIlil'.PI.AJONiAMJCESIl,OI\I~"JUll
A861SToWTDII51Rl!;l£MJIEI:II'
<SIGNAllRE
m~
OVER NAME>
DIBTRlCTfNGN:tJI @8
50.00 50.00 51.00 I 51.00 63.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 17.00 17.00
549.00
"-
II)
Q.
"As-Staked" Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the District Engineering Office
"
Q.
II)
0
II)
0>
II)
<LOoolS> - PflOJECTJWilI!foNOLOCl\.T1c.t SlEET CONfEHT$:
e _. - - - ••• on .-r...
E
e
E
E
<CONTRACTClR./S>
"""""' .....•••
~~~..::::s .•.••---,.,
<IlO1RlCI'......-.o""'"
""""",.
YI ~[):
<51~~
m~
t»ftI',~MDDEllIt;WDM&ION
m~
DRiTFlfCTB«lIEER
<SIGNATURE OVER NAUE>
m~
A&IlnANTRliGlONl'.l.~
<SIGNA TIRE OVER NAME>
m~
REGICNIIII.~CTlJR @8
o
I"l 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 63.00 54.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 17.00 17.00
L
549.00
"As-Staked" Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the District Engineering Office and approved by the concerned Regional Office
<LOoolS>
........... PROJECTNAMENI:lLC\CATlON'
..••..""""""
e - ......., - """""""" -
@8
••• on ..••.....
--
lI9A~~~~'l'1
<SIGNA lURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNAllRE OVER NAME>
<CONTRACTORIS>
- PRO.IfCTeNC»E£JI O'a,".--"-lrjfNi~l __ IIRi1IDNI\LDII£CTIlK
.~
F'ftOJlft;TIMNAQSt ~tIla'.~NrlDUl:3lGJllIt:(;llDN .v.llIlf'NofllC1:U1UM11t.~l~
~OFACf:No.~
M~ m~
50.00 50.00 51.00 51.00 I 63.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 17.00 I 17.00
549.00
"As-Staked" Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the Regional Office
<LOOOIS>
..•. """ I>ROJECTNMlEN«)l.OCATlOtit
..••..""""""
e """"",
~~ME>
""""'" - (SEE COVER StEEl) (SEE COVER SHEET)
•.......
(SEE CCN'ER SHEET)
""on .-r...
<CONTRACTORIS>
"""""' .....•••
lEI'.urr:....~~~_'l'1
...•.....
_OFFICE ••••
"""""", >
<SIGNA.TURE OVER NAME>
DWEf',<:oNCElINEDDESICIN~
••.•••••0"••'••
<SIGNATURE
~~ECTali
OVER WJ.tE>
OIIlB;TOR'MbOl'DalIGJII AIlIIIT~oIJ«RJR
"""""'''''''''"'
~"'"
""""""' ....... @8
50.00 50.00 I 45.00 I 45.00 63.00 I 45.33 I 45.33 45.33 I 45.33 45.33 45.34 17.00 17.00
549.00
"As-Staked" Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office
L- 15mm from ed9 e of the P" Per

r- 15 mm fr om edge 0f th e paper
I Annex "H - 2" I
<LOOOIS>
.........,. l>ltOJfCT~I>WJI.ocATlON
...,""""""
tit .......• ~_r'
-, ......... ............, 1-<-<- "'''' ...,NO.
e
(SEE COVER StEEl)
..
(SEE COVER SHEET) (SEE COlfER SHEET)
~~~..::::s.......,.
<~ORJS>
<SlGW,TURE
M~
"""""-
OVER NAME>
-
.....,""""'"
,
~&.IfME>
<$IGMI\TURE OVER NAME>
......., •..•....
t:HI:f. <alNCERNED DElIIUN DWBCN>
M
<SIGNATURE OIlER NAME>
I'I'l:O.£t;lUltct:f,;I~
.....,""""'"
~~OfDEBOlf
."
l\AIIT~oUffKlll
""""""""""'"
~fl!ctMO\L ""
8f:lMCflS
@
50.00 50.00 I 45.00 I 45.00 I 53.00 45.33 I 45.33 45.33 I 45.33 45.33 J 46.34 17.00 17.00
549.00
~
Q.
0
Q. "As-Staked" Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked by the concerned UPMO Cluster and approved at the Central Office
Q)
:S
a
--
Q)
co
..••..•...
e
Q) ~AN08U8IofTTED:
<LOGOIS> <LOGOIS> 0'''''''' """"'" """",", ,",",He.
E
~ -.-.-"
e
(SEE COVER SHEET) •••• COlIER 8HE£T) (SEE CO'v'ER SHEET)
<S~n.tRE OVERNAME> <StGNA.llJRE OVER NAME> ~~~.:::aMllilHWAYI <SfGNAruRE OVER NAME>
.~
<SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAJ.tE>.
...•"".
...•••.•. .....,a..•..•. .~
<NAY,>
E <~~
."
"""""'- <CONSUl TANT/S> l'lflO.IECT"""'OER
....,""""" DIlT!' 1lUREAlJ00OE&lGfrol
->
E 1M"
M"-""""'" _.'""""'"
o
I') 40.00 J 44.00 40.00 J 44.00 47.00 J 63.00 I 44.00 J 44.00 44.00 J 44.00 44.00 L 44.00 17.00
L
549.00
HAs-Staked"Plan for UPMO implemented projects with Construction Supervision Consultant, prepared by the Contractor, checked by the
Consultant, checked and recommended by UPMO, and approved at the Central Office
L- 15mm from ed9 e of the PaPer

r-- 15mm romegeo
d 1 th e poper
I Annex "1- 1· I
...•......•. Pfk).JfCTNIIUE'IlNDLOCATlOf.I
~"""""'"
tit
".,.,..,
--- ...-.. -- - "ro •• •••m'o,
_.
<l000lS>
-
<CONTRACTOIlJS>
50.00
- """'"'-
50.00 51.00 51.00
~~~~"
......"....-.. ......
53,00
~=
PROJIECTENGIN!EII
52.00
M=
CIWF.~SIiC1tDN>'
52.00
M=
CItIlII'f'l,NNNGI'Hl~HC11CN
52.00 I
~=
ASIlI5TANTml>I1QI;Ta«ON;lOR
52.00 I
~=
Dliffll!;T~
52.00
@
I 17.00
e
I 17,00
549.00
~
"
c.
0 Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the District Engineering Office
c.
"
:5
0
"
0>
PftS'Il."l!D; PROJECTNo'lMEHlDl.OCAllON: eHl!ETOONTENI"a:
tit
CHrQCED: ......., - -......... -, "'oo. ~"',
e
<LOGo.'S>
E
e <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> ~~~
....•..•.. ......
..",.,,-
.... " <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SlGNA1\JRE OVER NAME> <SIGNA 1\JRE OVER NAME> <SIGNA 1\JRE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
@
E
E
o
-
<CONTRACTORIS>
- """'"'''''''''''' ~=
"""""- M=
Cttti',<IIIII"t£Il9mN~
~=
CHl:f,~J\M)DElifQHIIIOC11ON
~=
••••• TI\HT~P«JIEER
~=
llImU::TINQ~
'" 50.00 50.00 51,00 51,00 53.00 52.00 52.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 17,00 I 17,00
L
549.00
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor, concurred by the Design Consultant and approved by the District Engineering Office
<l000lS>
...•......•. ~JW.lI;/<MOLOCAT\OfrI;
S><HT"""",""
tit '''''''''' """""" """"""'" -, "ro •• ~"',
<CONTRACTORIS>
50.00 I
PROJECT w.HN3ER
50.00 I 50.00 I 50.00 I

..•...•.•.••
.........:,,~OFll<E1'tU'HE$
<DlOlRlCT_
....•..•..
53.00
- -
OI'I'l.IaI:WQMSANI)
••••••
••••••.
I
<SI~_'lt""'"
54.00 I
<SlGNA1\JRE OVER NAME>
Ctfit",I'lAJININli'NrlD~1lMSlON
52.00 I
<SIGNA 1\JRE OVER NAME>
IJI5IItK;T~
52,00 I
MiIRI1NlT~~IUK
52.00 I
Rt.liIUtW.llMt.~'lJK
52.00
@
I 17.00
e
I 17,00
549.00
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the District Engineering Office and approved by the concerned Regional Office
<LOOOIS>
"IlOJtCTNMlEANOl.ClCATlON'
~"""""'"
It ""'-, ...•.... -, .....-.. _ .
",oo. ~ •..
-
<CONTRACTORIS>
50.00
PROJECTIAANAGSl
50.00 51,00 51,00

•• ~~"':":~N8ttIlA'l1
~
<IlBlIJlrW.OFFlCEItiI
....•..•..
.•.
EJrQ&IlNGOf'f'P.>
53.00
PROJECT ENONBI
52.00 I
<SIGNA1\JRE OVER NAME>
~. <IlIII"LeIIENT
52.00
samtlN>
ctIEf·~MDDalGN5ECJIIJN
52.00
<SlGNA1\JRE OVER NAME>
tllimlCTENlJIrIi:ER
52.00
IlEOICltW.IlMECTOFl
52.00
@
17.00
e 17.00
549.00
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor, concurred by the Design Consultant, checked by the District Engineering Office and approved by the concerned Regional Office
L- 15mm from ed9 e 01 the PaPer

r- 15mm f rom edge 0f th e p0 per
I Annex "I - 2" I
<LOllOIS>
PJIOJECTNAMEANOtoCATlt:»l
MOT""""""
e """,",. ......., _ . _. .......... ",on ....,'"
-
<CONl1lACTORIS>
50.00 I
-
PAO.eCTMANAGER
50.00 I 51.00 I 51.00

p.....n..n.~..:uc~ESloI&lMAn
I
.........
••••••••• 0fftCE
53.00
•••
I'ftO,JfCTENONDl
52.00
CH&, •••• PIJiMEHl'JrIGDMlIfl,1N>
52.00
~.P\AMDlGN&lI*IIiilt~
52.00
- ASIISTANTf£QOfrW.DlftEII;fCR
52.00
--
REGIOIW..DllECTCIt
52.00 I
@
17.00
e
I 17.00
549.00
~
'a.
" Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the Regional Office
"
Q.
'"
:5
0
'"
"'"" <LOllOIS>
PIIOPARED', I'IlOJECTNoIIMEN-IDtoCATlflIlI: 8H!ETCONT1!NfS:
e """"'"
......., ...- - - ""on ...,'"
e
E
2
@
...•..
--
~~~~HllJ"'Yl
<SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
<CONTRACTORIS> "',,,,,,,"',, <flEGOW.QFfICENo.>
"'"""',.- ~,~CWIIiICN> ASBIITANTflUlIDIW..llI'CCJ'CR
--
cteF.f'I.}I,~NfDtJUIGIIlatYIBICN
--
REOIClIMl.DlRECTlJIiI
E M_ M_
E
o
'" 50.00 I 50.00 I 51.00 51.00 53.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 17.00 I 17.00
L
549JlO
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor, concurred by the Design Consultant and approved by the Regional Office
<l0ll0lS>
<CONTRACTORIS>
-
-
•..•..

PAOJECT~
PROJECTNlIIMEAHOLCJO:ATtCItI: SHEETCON1ENTS:
e
*"","-,~~...;::::s_Yl
.......... •..
"""""""""'
O£m>,
~~>
SIJlIIjf'f1'B):
>
........ ,.
................
CNl!F..••••••••••.•••
""'uDl<_~
""""""""
~IGNATURE OVER NAME>

1'ftQ.I;C'~IUl'l
(SEE COVER stEET]
llIft!CTOR~ut"CI:BUI'I
(SEE COYER SHEET)
A861S'~"H'f'OIIiI
M_ """'" """"'"
--
1_-
(SEE COolER SHEET)
~"'"
""""""', ..
,,""
@
"''''
e
••• ro".
50.00 50.00 45.00 I 45.00 I 53.00 I 45.33 I 45.33 45.33 45.33 45.33 45.34 17.00 17.00
549.00
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office
<l0ll0lS>
f'RfPAR!D; PlIO.ECT NME NolOLOCATION' ...,- It
O£m>,
-- """"""'"
~ "''''
...,.•..
e
~~ME> (SEE COVER StEET) (SEE COVER SHEET) (SEE. C<>JER SHEET)
<CQNTRACTORIS>
PMO.ECT UANAQER
~~...:;e...;::::s.••.•
.••.•.....
_0fftCE •••
Kr.
"""""",
>
<SIGNATURE CM:R NAME:o-
CHIEF,<OONCB'lNEDDl!i1llVH1JIVBDt,P
na." 8I.IlENJOFOE6IElN
<SIGNA~~NAME>
--
~MtCftlB!llClN
..-
ASIlISTSR'rM«R;lIIl
TI!CHNCAlBeIi'llk:a;
~rfR,"",
TECtfMlOl,L llElMa!8
@
50.00 50.00 45.00 45.00 53.00 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.34 I 17.00 I 17.00
549.00
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor, concurred by the Design Consultant, checked and recommended by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office
L-- 15mm f ro m edge 0f the poper

r-- 15 mm romegeo d f th e poper
I Annex "I - 3" I
........." ....,.- """",,, ...•.•• ........ ....,."',

tit ...."""
PAOJttTNMII;ANDLOCAnOt.l;
""""'""'" "''''
e
<toOOIS>
••••••••• /f'ME> (SEE COVER St£ET) (SEE COVER SHEET) (SEE COVER SHEET)
~~~.::::slQlllAn @
-
<SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIG~TURE CNERNAME> <SIGNA~~ NAME>
<CONTRACTORIS>
~
Pl'IO.ET~ .-J""",,,,"
.......... )0
ctIEF.~Dl:IllQNDMIIlCN>
nt.TI' 1II.JAP,lJ0f'0ESIlilN
~D ~
~crtlR~OFDB!IGN
~D
ASSST~Mn'FOR
••••••••• """"'"
•••..•••
~FOM
lECtIIflOI\l.SlIMCEB
50.00 50.00 45.00 45.00 53.00 I 45.33 45.33 45.33 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.34 I 17.00 I 17.00
.,~
0.
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the concerned UPMO Cluster and approved at the Central Office
549.00
o
.,
0.
:5
.,
-,
0
.,'"
"0
-- ","""", .......", ..•.."'.
tit
PItOJECTtMME/VVlOCATIOH, stEETCQN'lENT8;
""""""'" ""'"
e
<LOGOIS>
E ~~ME> (SEE COVER SfoEET) (SEE COVER SHEET) (SEE COlfER SHEET)
o
J: <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> ~~~.::::s " ..•......
.••••. <SIGNATURE CNER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NM4E>
@
E
E
o
<CONTRACTORJS>
~
l'ftOJECTMANAOER .-J""",,,,"
....",.....
CHEJ',~DElIICNl:WII9lON>
••••.••• 8IJIIIElWOFDEI8IQM
~
",:,::,;r: ~t:TUR~OFDS5ION
~D
~D
ASI!AST~"-R'(RlR
"""""" ••••••••
~~~
"""""' ..""'"
'" 50.00 I 50.00 45.00 45.00 I 53.00 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.33 I 45.34 I 17.00 I 17.00
L
549.00
Revised Plan prepared by the Contractor, concurred by the Design Consultant, checked and recommended by the concerned UPMO Cluster and approved at the Central Office
......""" D£a<m ~ ..•..""

tit
FEVEW'EiD AND Sl.IIllr..-JTEO ,
"""'""" """"""
e
<LOGOIS> <tooo/s>
_ COlIERllI<EE'T) (SEE COlIER SHEET) (SEE COVER SHEET)
i ~t;t;T CONTENT;
<CONTRACTQRIS>
<S~TURE
PROJeCT~
OVERNAUE•.
<CONSU~ANT'S>
<SIGHA. lURE OVER NAME>
FftOJECTw.tWER
lII'~":":~~ttlIIMA
.....,
....•......
CWS1ER>
~"
- <SIGNA. T\JRE OYER
""""' .. """"
IIWl£> <SIGNA TIJRE OIlER NM,4E>
~UI'WIOCl.USTl!fl.>
~.~> ~>~>
-""''''''''''''
~ •• ~>
"""""""""'"
40.00 I 44.00 I 40.00 I 44.00 I 47.00 I 53.00 I 44.00 I 44.00 I 44.00 I 44.00 I 44.00 44.00 I 17.00
549.00
Revised Plan for UPMO implemented projects with Construction Supervision Consultant, prepared by the Contractor, checked by the
Consultant, checked and recommended by UPMO, and approved at the Central Office
L- 15mm from ed 9e of the Po Per

r- 15 mm d
romegeo f th e paper
I Annex"J _1" I
<LOGOIS>
..•.....•• PI'tOJECT"""""NIOI.OC:II"TIClN 9HEElc:otm:NTS:
e """"'" - ~.
"""""" """"
....,...
.-
<CONTRACTOR/$>
55.00
MW
"""""-
52.00 73.50 73.50
----
~,.,=:::;e::e.:::::a
••••
.........
<tllS'I1lCTlOlOIEEANloma;:~
53.00
Yl
MW
PAOJECTENON£R
52.00
Mtt
CI'W.~11ICil5lCl'lJNl>
52.00 I
Mtt
AS9IITAN1Ol3"TR1CTE~
52.00
Mtt
DIlITR£TiNOlllHIt
52.00
@8
17.00 17.00
549.00
~
••
Q.
0 "As-Built" Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the District Engineering Office
Q.
••
0
••
'" -- ....,.~ ""' •.....
-- - ....,..•.
E
<LOOOIS>
PllOJEC'TfrWoIE,\N01..OCA1'lOH;
It
~:~""Yl
""""",,, """"
e <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
......•••
.~
<SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
""""" ...••.•. <SIGNATURE OVER NAME> <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
@8
- """""
..•..•.•. -
<CONTRACTORIS> I'RlJECTENl3INEER D'IEF.~JJNG8ECQl.lN> ASSlBTANTfIE(lIOIoW.~lUJ( REQIDtW..~crgf
E
E
<OOTRICTENGf&IlItGOFR::E"
~~
o
'" 50.00 I 50.00 I 51.00 I 51.00 53.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 17.00 I 17.00
L
549.00
"As-Built" Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the District Engineering Office and approved by the concerned
Regional Office
<LOGOIS>
.....•.• PRO.ECl' NAUE /\NO U)(;A:11ON
"""-
It '""""'" - """"""'" """""" "'''''
....,00.
<C~~ORIS>
<SlGNA.TURE
PRO.ECT
OVER NAME>
wtWJEft
~~~.:::::a~",
.........
""""""""',."
PftWECTellill'El<fl
cttI:F_~'N:lIll'lBlON"
Mtt
A5S151Hf1lt1:U1ONN,l;IIHH;llJW
Mtt
IIEQIJNN.[Mt.CHJH @8
55.00 52.00 73.50 73.50 53.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 17.00 17.00
549.00
"As-Built" Plan prepared by the Contractor and approved by the Regional Office
<LOGOIS> """""'. PROJECTNlilMEANOI.OCATIOJ.l" ••••",a."••••

It ""' .....
-- ....,.,.,..,."
(SEE COVER $toIEET)
""""",,,
(SEE COVER SHEET)
"''''' ....,""
<CONTRACTORIS:>
"""""-
lJEI'AlmIEIff~...:1~ttelflIrA'fl
..•..•.•.
"""""'''''''',."
""""" ...•.... <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
ctIl&',.cIMPLEIENllNOlJtIBCN>
R£GllCltW.DIlECT'QR
A8lI8TNIT~TNn'I'I;JfI
RE~0fI£M1'IClNIlI
~_
-"""'''''''
••••.•• FOR @8
50.00 I SO.OO I 51.00 I 51.00 I 53.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 17.00 I 17.00
549.00
'As-Bui"" Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked and recommended by the Regional Office and approved at the Central Office
L- 15mm from edge of the paper

r- 15 mm romegeo
d f th e paper
I Annex"J - 2" I
<LOOOIS> --- PllO.§CTNMlf:ANDI.OCATICItol SHliETCONTEHB:
e•.••.... ........ ..-..,. ~ -, ",on """'NO.
e
(SEE COVER SHEET) (SEE COVER SHEET)
-
<CONTRACTORJS>
-
-..a_
<SIGNATURE OVER NAME> ~~...:..c~ .....• <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
.....,.........
"tl
""""" ...•....
~n
~n
~T __
~n
PIKlJI!CTt8II:CTCIt
......,"""""
- ,,"">C•••••.••••
A8lIIlITIMT a:ao:l,1oftY RlR
~~ ....••..•."""
~I"""'FOR @
50.00 50.00 51.00 51.00 53.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 I 52.00 I 52.00 I 17.00 I 17.00
549.00
...I>
a.
0
a.
"As-Builf' Plan prepared by the Contractor, checked by the concerned UPMO Cluster and approved at the Central Office
I>
•...
I>
'" ....,. 1E\lElNs) NIOaIIWCJTI!D:

"""'" ........ ..........." -'" ",on
"""''''.
fit
I>
<LOOOIS> <LOGOIS.
e
E (sa: COVER SHEET) (E£ rovER SHEET)
e
E
E -
<CONTRACTORIS>
<StGNAnJRE OVER NAME'
~n
l'ROJECTWoWlI38'I <CONSUlTANT/$>
~n
-..a_
<SaGNAruRE OVER NALfE>
,~
lIIlWmIENr~~.:;:::s""A
.....,cws_
..........
<StGNATURE
~n
OVER NAME> <SIGNA.11JRE OVER NAME>
~~ ~n
<SlGNt.TURE OVER NAME>
....,""""'" non:
...•"".
VPMO OPERAlION$
...•"" .
lAIOOPEMTJ:Ml
@
o
..., 40.00 44.00 40.00 I 44.00 74.00 I 53.00 44.00 I 44.00 I 44.00 I 44.00 I 44.00 I 17.00 I 17.00
L
549.00
"As-Built" Plan for UPMO implemented projects with Construction Supervision Consultant, prepared by the Contractor, checked by the
Consultant, checked ~nd recommended by UPMO, and approved at the Central Office
L- 15mm from ed9 e of the PaPer

IAnnex "K - 1"1
FOR CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR DESIGN AND BUILD PROJECTS
NOTE: r
THE ABOVE DATA ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. THE PROCURING ENTITY DOES NOT
GUARANTEE THAT THESE DATA ARE FULLY CORRECT, UP-Te-DATE, AND APPLICABLE
TO THE PROJECT AT HAND. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY
AND APPLICABILITY OF ALL DATA, INCLUDING THE ABOVE, THAT IT WILL USE IN ITS
DESIGN \ ~UILD PROPOSAL AND SERVICES.
L-------\--------~-~----~-------__J-
USE 1.25 mm FONT SIZE
IAnnex "K - 2"1
LIABILITY WAIVER
TO BE SIGNED BY THE DESIGN
CONSUL TANT/S FOR DETAILED ENGINEERING
DESIGN PLANS
NOTE:
fI
PURSUANT TO ITEM 5 OF ANNEX 'A' OF THE REVISED IMPLEMENTING RULES
AND REGULATION OF RA. 9184, THE APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORIZED
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS OF DETAILED ENGINEERING SURVEYS AND DESIGNS
UNDERTAKEN BY CONSULTANTS NEITHER DIMINISHES THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
THE LATTER FOR THE TECHNICAL INTEGRITY OF THE SURVEYS AND DESIGNS
NOR TRANSFER ANY PART OF THAT RESPONSIBILITY TO THE APPROVING
OFFICIALS. el
e~
gi!
THE DESIGN CONSULTANT SHALL BE HELD FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE I
STRUCTURAL DEFECTS/FAILURES OF THE FACILITIES/STRUCTURES DUE TO
~
~
FAULTY AND/OR INADEQUATE DESIGN AND SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT FOR THE
CHANGES MAD WITHOUT THE CONFORMITY OF THE CONSULTANTS. i
I
I
I
~-------
PROJECT MANAGER
<Consultantls>
~OO~
------------------------------1
rI
J
IAnnex "K - 3"1
LIABILITY WAIVER FOR

DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN PREPARED
BY DESIGN AND BUILD CONTRACTOR
NOTE:
THE DESIGN AND BUILD CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR

THE INTEGRITY OF THE DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN AND THE
PERFORMANCE OF THE STRUCTURE IRRESPECTIVE OF THE APPROVAL OR
CONFIRMATION BY THE PROCURING ENTITY.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STRUCTURAL

DEFECTS/FAILURES OF THE FACILITIES/STRUCTURES DUE TO FAULTY AND/OR
INADEQUATE DESIGN AND SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT FOR THE CHANGES MADE
WITHOUT THE CONFORMITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.
~
\ \
PROJECT MANAGER
<Contractor/s>
~~
-------------------~-----_1 I
'--- USE 1.25 mm FONT SIZE
IAnnex "K - 4"1
LIABILITY WAIVER
TO BE SIGNED BY THE CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION
CONSUL TANT/S
FOR "AS-STAKED" AND "AS-BUILT" PLANS
NOTE:
PURSUANT TO ITEM 6.4 OF ANNEX 'B' OF THE REVISED IMPLEMENTING RULES

AND REGULATION OF R.A. 9184, THE CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION
CONSULTANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION AND CHECKING
OF QUANTITIES AND QUALITIES OF WORK ACCOMPLISHED BY THE
CONTRACTOR AS AGAINST THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND
PROGRAM OF WORKS.
THE CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION CONSULTANT SHALL BE HELD FULLY

RESPONSIBI,.E FOR THE FAILURE OF THE FACILITIES/STRUCTURES DUE TO
POOR QUALITY OF WORKMANSHIP ACCOMPLISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR
EXCEPT FOR THOSE FAILURE DUE TO FAULTY DESIGN AS PER APPROVED
DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN PLAN. THE APPROVAL BY THE AUTHORIZED
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS OF "AS-STAKED", REVISED OR "AS-BUILT" PLANS
UNDERTAKEN/CHECKED BY CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION CONSULTANT
NEITHER DIMINISHES THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LATTER FOR THE
TECHNICAL INTEGRITY OF THE SAID PLANS NOR TRANSFER ANY PART OF
THAT RESPONSIBILITY TO THE APPROVING OFFICIALS.
PROJECT MANAGER
<Consultanl/s>
1--
~OO~
-------~~~--~--------.~~_._._--~---I I
IAnnex UK - 5"'

REVISED PLANS CONCURRED BY OED CONSULTANTS
;-r
NOTE:
PURSUANT TO ITEM 7 OF DPWH DEPARTMENT ORDER NO. 50. SERIES 2002. THE
II
DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN CONSULTANT ISSUE THIS NON-OBJECTION TO VARY
TO THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE IMPLEMENTING OFFICE. INCORPORATING MAJOR
CHANGES IN THE ORIGINAL DESIGN DURING THE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
PROVIDED. HOWEVER. THAT THIS ISSUANCE WILL NOT RELIEVE THE ENTITY WHICH
I
DESIGNED THF CHANGES OF ITS RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH. ~I
81
CONCURRED BY:
~I
PROJECT MANAGER
<OED Consullantls>
75.00mm
USE 1.25mmFONTS/ZE
IAnnex "K - 6" I

REVISED PLANS CONCURRED BY OED CONSULTANTS WITH
CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION CONSULTANTS
NOTE: TI
PURSUANT TO ITEM 7 OF DPWH DEPARTMENT ORDER NO. SO, SERIES 2002, THE I
DETAILED ENGINEERING DESIGN CONSULTANT ISSUE THIS NON-oBJECTION TO VARY
TO THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION CONSULTANT,
II
Il
INCORPORATING MAJOR CHANGES IN THE ORIGINAL DESIGN DURING THE PROJECT
~
IMPLEMENTATION PROVIDED. HOWEVER, THAT THIS ISSUANCE WILL NOT RELIEVE el
THE ENTITY WHICH DESIGNED THE CHANGES OF ITS RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH. ei
gi
CONCURRED BY:
~I II
i
r
I
PROJECT MANAGER
I
r
<OED Consullantls> I
J
\
L----~--\-----~---_. 75.00mm

--------------1
i-
R=28.0mm
IAnnex"L -1" I
R=25.Omm

Style = AliaI
Text HeIgI1t. 6.4llmm
)

Style = Arlal Bclld
Text HeigIlt. 9.00mm
)
<REGIONAL OFFICE No.> ~ H=7.8Omm (

Style - Arlal
Text~'7.8lImm
)

Style - Arlal
TextHeigllt.6.4Omm
)
. For al/ plans approved by the District Engineering Office
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES H-6.4Omm (

Style. Arlal
TextHeIght=6.4Omm
)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS H-9.00mm (

StyIe.ArlaIBclld
TeortHelght.9.00mm
)
<REGIONAL OFFICE No.> H=7.8Omm (

SIyIe=AliaI
TextHelght=7.8Omm
)
<ADDRESS> H-6.4Omm (
SIyIe-AliaI
TextHeIght.6.4Omm
)
For all plans approved by the Regional Office
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES H-6.4Omm (

StyIe-AliaI
Text H.,;ght = 6.4llmm
)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS H=9.0Omm (

StyIe=AliaIBclld
Text HeigIlt = 9.00mm
)
Style, Arlal )
<UPMO CLUSTER> H=7.8Omm ( TextHeight=7.BOmm
Style. AliaI
Text HeIght. 6.4Omm
)
For all plans approved by UPMO

IAnnex "L - 2" I
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES styIo>ArIaI

H=6.4Omm ( Text HeIght> 6.4Omm
)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS H=9.00mm

Style - ArIaI Bold
( Text~'9.00nvn
)
BUREAU OF DESIGN Style - Ariel

H=7.8Omm ( Text.=r.8Omm
)
MANILA SIyIo-Arial
H=6.4Omm ( Texl~t>6.4llmm
)
For all plans approved by the Bureau of Design
C.Y. <YEAR> PROJECT H=6.4Omm
REVISED PLAN FOR H=6.4Omm
<NAME OF PROJECT> H-8.0Omm
<SECTION>
<LOCATION>
<STATION LIMITS> H=6.0Omm
<NET LENGTH>

For all plans implemented and approved by DPWH
I H=3.Omm
SCyIe=Arial
( T""t Heigh!= 3.00•••
)
H-4.4Omm
styIo = ArioI Bold
( TextHeight=4.40mm
)
H-3.00mm
styIo- Ariel
( Text ~h!> 3.00mm
)
H-2.5Omm
styIo Arial )
SUBMITTED: RECOMMENDED: ( TexIH.-=2.50mm
APPROVED:
70.00 72.00 96.50 72.00 96.50 72.00 70.00

CHIEF, PLANNING AND DESIGN SECTION ASSISTANT DISTRICT ENGINEER DISTRICT ENGINEER
DATE DATE
Spacing sample for plans with three signatories on cover sheet

IAnnex "L - 3" I

52.40 72.00 52.40
I <SIGNATURE> I I <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE>

PROJECT MANAGER CHIEF, <IMPlEMENTING DIVISION> ASSISTANT REGIONAL DIRECTOR REGIONAL DIRECTOR
<CONTRACTOR NAME>
DATE DATE DATE DATE
. Spacing sample for plans with four signatories on cover sheet

31A5 72.00 31.45
I <SIGNATURE> I I <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE>

PROJECT MANAGER CHIEF, <IMPlEMENTING SECTION> DISTRICT ENGINEER ASSISTANT REGIONAL DIRECTOR REGIONAL DIRECTOR
<CONTRACTOR NAME>
Spacing sample for plans with five signatories on cover sheet
15.(]() 72.00 15.00
1 <SIGNATURE> I I <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE> <SIGNATURE>

DATE o..TE DATE DATE DATE DATE
Spacing sample for plans with six signatories on cover sheet

IAnnex "L - 4" I
REPI&IC OF ne: I'l«.PF'te H-1.5Omm (..".. MO)

ARTMENT OF PI&JC WORKS AND HtBHWAYS H-2.00l'lll'll (••••• MO ••• )
••••••••. """10.> H-1.'7Drnm (StylI; -AriIl~"hfor~"'~"bojlM~OIIcII, UPMOau.a.nar""-d~
'"*' 4*:GJONAL
.....•••.
<IlISTRlCT ENGINEERINGOFACE> H-2.5Qnvn
H-1.5Onvn
(Style
(Slyt&t
- MIl
•.ArW)
NImlllI,o.ng. "<OtS1RlCT £NGINeERNlOFF!CE>" OfFICE NO>. Uf't,I) <CLUSTER> at BUREAU OF OE:SlGN lICCOllIInlt klwl*:t\dlIce ~ \he ~_ )
95.00
50.00
•.. Ii;
"
a. a.
"
a. "
a.
" "
:5
'0
"
.gI-
50.00
~:~=
H-1.<lIlmm
~=:=)9l*i)
("",--0 :5
'0
"'"
"0
"
E
"E
~o 60.00
~
E E
DANILO L. BALlSI H-2.Mrnm (,.._ArilIfBold)
t QtQ'-li~'t&DlYIIIION.B.O.D. H-l.5Omm (•••• """) E

It)
52.00
EDWIN C. MATANGUIHAN H_2.5Ilmm (_.""" ••••••
...•..
QJ.C.·MiBIllT"'NT~TOIt,
"""""'
H-1.llQmm (_._)
."""
52.00
(SEE COVER SHEET) •••. 2.00mm (Stolte .,..)
LEA N. DELFINADO. CESO IV •••• 2.SOmm (St)oItI"'AritfBc:td)

lJIIMt;l;lUNIV.~IWllf"~
H-I.!lOnm (••"'._)
52.00
(SEE COVER SHEET) H-2.00mm (_._)
(_
GlLBERTO S. REYES
AAaTANT
FOR l£aNCAL
••••••
SliCfllITARY
52.00
H-2.00mm
8SMCES
H-2.5Ilmm
H-1.&omm
(SEE COVER SHEET)

(_."""
.-
(St,.• '"MIl)
••• )
{~-...w~ H-2.5Omm
(_ •••••• H-l.ljllmm E~~~~~~OI
OPeRATIOIrflj;NmT'ECHNI::;.O.l saMCES
(_.~ H-l.!lOnm
<_.-0 H-1.51lmm
52.00
(~"AriII~ H-2.00mm
Roclua of Clrcte - 7.00mm
(•••.-0 H-l.5Ilmm
~acIu. of CIrde - 7.00mm

(s.lSytnboI,Slv\e-ArIlIIB<*I) H-2..OOmm
(SetSMetNo.,~"ArirlI) H-2,OOmm

IAnnex "L - 5" I
-2.00mm (••••• ·-Wll

<CONTRACTOR/S> -1.5Omm C•••• ·_)
40.00 44.00 <l000lS>
44.00
~ ~
••o
Q. ••
0-
Q.
o
••
:5
.,
0-
:5
74.00
'0 '0
.,
t H_1.5Omm
H-1.70rTwn
( __
(St)IlI.
c ArllIIHImIw, 0I'IIll:w. hforpoteds
MalNlnow,o..o."<DISTRICT
'*"-~
ENGlNEEflINGOffICE>o"
bytltRllgloNfOfllo&..
_ <REGIQNIf.L OFfCE
UPMOo.-.OI eu..uGf~
NO.:>-, l$If#;)<ClLlSTER» lit BUREAU Of oesaJN ~ IIDwhiCtl f:IlIU ~ "PfOtIclplen .,'"
-0
! 53.00
E
o
.l:
I <SIGNATURE OVER NAME>
44.00
c:~TIJRE
44.00
OVER NAME:>- H-2.00rnm
H-l.5Omm
-1
(SI)4t•.•••.••BotJ)
(••••• _)
"NIIlII
H-UIOmm (~·MII}
(SEE CCVER SHEET) H-1.8Ornm (~ •.•••• )
<SGNA.TUFtE OVER NAME:>- •••• 2.00mm

H-U50rnm (•••..·-Wll
C••••
·..,.l
..,.)
44.00
C..".·""') ••••'.lIOmm
44.00
(SEE COVER SHEET)
•.........,)
Hoot .5Cmm
(
(_ ••••• ~ •••• 2.0Qmm

C..,..·....,) •••.,._
(..,...""'! •••.,.O<lmm
<..,.. . ....,) ••.. U'Cmm
44.00
<__ -ArlIIBaltI H-2.00mm

Rodkd of CIrcle - 7.00mrn
Rodlut of C!rcIe - 7.ODmrn

(&8lSynCdSlylecMll8ot:l) H-2.00m",
(Set8NMltHo.,&ytt"'AIifII) H-2.00mm
~
••o
Q.
Q.
••
-••
:5
o
'"••
-0
E
o
.l:
E
E
,..,
o

Manila
AUG 2 5 2020
DEPARTMENT ORDER ) SUBJECT: Standard DPWH Multi-Purpose
Tent
NO. 82 ~
)
Series of 2020 ~.,. lD)6i'
To provide uniform and quality immediate temporary shelter facilities for the victims of
calamities, i.e., earthquake, typhoon and other disasters, a standard plan for DPWH Multi-
Purpose Tent that can be erected in short period of time and still reusable, is hereby issued
for guidance and reference in the implementation for all Regional and District Engineering
Offices.
Said standard plan (Annex "A"), consists of the following options on flooring depending on the
actual requirements/needs on the site:
a) Option 1: Wooden flooring on steel framing platform; and

b) Option 2: Concrete slab on fill
Soft/electronic copy of said plans may be downloaded from DPWH intranet (http:dpwhnet)
under Bureau of Design - Standard Plans.
For immediate compliance.
MARK A. VILLAR
~--- Department of Public Works and Highways
1111111111111111111111111111111111111
Secretary WINOR01533
5.1.3 DlB/ECM/AMD
-119 ~ ' I?Jt)PW ~
1)1" \10' ttl) ?D
.1J-~4'~
Manila
Sf:P 1 4 2020
DEPARTMENT ORDER ) SUBJECT: Geotagging DPWH Civil Works
Projects
NO. 85 )l
Series of 2020 ~ ~\l\fl2.tllU
In line with the Department's thrust to improve the efficiency in planning, budgeting, project
monitoring and contract management processes, and in the implementation of the Project
and Contract Management Application (PCMA), geotagged photos are hereby required in the
following project stages:
Taskl Activi Accountabili

1 Ensure that "Before" photographs are Designated
captured during budget preparation by Planning
the Region or District for civil works Coordinator of a
projects. Regional Office
Ensure that "Before" photographs are Designated

captured during budget preparation by Regional Project
Unified Project Management Office Manager
(UPMO) for civil works projects under the
Re ion's eo ra hie area.
2 Upon Mobilization Ensure that "Mobilization" photographs Designated
are captured during the conduct of the Project Engineer
joint field "as-staked" survey. The taking (PE)
of the photographs shall verify that the
location of the civil works project is in the
same location when it was funded. The
captured photographs shall also confirm
the availability of the site and condition
when com ared to the ro"ect sta e 1.
3 Monthly Progress Ensure that the "Monthly Progress" of civil Designated
works are also documented in Project Engineer
photographs. These photographs shall be (PE)
the visual evidence of civil works
accomplishments during the month
covered.
4 Completion The "Completion" photographs shall be Implementing
taken only during the conduct of the final Office's
inspection. These photographs can only Construction
be uploaded to the Geographic Division/Section
Information System (GIS) of the
Department once the status of project
com onent is "Com leted" in the PCMA.
0,0, No 85 ~ Series of 2020
Geotagging DPWH Civil Works Projects
Page 2 of 2
Further, to assure that the geotagging application works efficiently, the following Offices shall
perform the following tasks:
Accountabili Tasks! Activities

Planning Service (PS) and • Coordinate with the Information Management Service
Bureau of Construction (IMS) on the constant updating of the geotagging
(BOC) procedure and processes, rules and standards; and,
• Ensure the utilization of the Infratrack Application (IA)
and that the necessary training is provided to end-users.
Information Management • Maintain the accessibility of the geotagged photographs

Service (IMS) in the DPWH website to all authorized users; and
• Maintain back-u co ies of the eota ed hoto ra hs.
Development Planning • Review and ensure the integrity of the geotagged
Division (DPD), photographs taken at the Project Stage 1.
Programming Division (PD),
Statistics Division (SD), all
under Planning Service
PS , and UPMO
Project Engineer (PE) of the • Review the integrity of the geotagged photographs
1m lementin Office 10 taken at the Pro'ect Sta es 2 3 and 4.
Head of the Implementing • Monitor compliance by all concerned personnel on the
Office eota in of civil works ro'ects.
The schedule for compliance on all stages is as follows:
Schedule Activi
Effective Immediately • Geotagged Mobilization, Monthly Progress, and
Completion Photos of all regular infrastructure Civil
Works project components regardless of cost,
infrastructure type, or fund source should be carried out
durin the month of the activi s ecified.
FY 2021/ succeeding • Geotagged "Before" photos of all regular infrastructure
Regional Budget Proposal Civil Works project components being proposed for
(RBP) and UPMO Budget funding regardless of cost.
Pro osal UBP
This Order shall supersede Department Order No. 16, series of 2018 and take effect
immediately.
~~---
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary
11.1.1 EBM/ETC/MNP
Departrmnt of Public Works and Highways

1111111111111111111111111111111111111
WINOP01757
Qq'l.\?J DP~\\
()C1'?Jv. 'l.t> 2t>
Republic of the Philippines ·sr'l
Manila
SEP 2 9 2020
DEPARTMENT ORDER ) SUBJECT: PRESCRIBING GUIDELINES ON
) THE DESIGN OF BICYCLE
No._8_8_ )
)
FACILITIES ALONG NATIONAL
ROADS
Series of 2020 Jl tJl.3l>/~O
In line with the continuing efforts of the DPWH to support the promotion of active modes of
transport by the government, the attached ANNEX "A", Guidelines on the Design of
Bicycle Facilities Along National Roads, providing a uniform design of bicycle facilities
in order to achieve a consistent approach that will meet the needs and safe access of
bicyclists and other road users, is hereby prescribed for the guidance and compliance of all
concerned.
All projects .of DPWH that involve new road and bridge construction or future expansion to
relieve traffic congestions such as road/bridge widening, diversion/bypass roads, among
others, shall include in its design the provision of bicycle facility, if feasible, based on the
,.studies of this Department. Exemptions to the provisions of this Order may be allowed
subject to the evaluation of the Bureau of Design and approval of the Undersecretary for
Technical Services. For this purpose, the form hereto attached as Annex "B" is hereby
prescribed.

MARK A. VILLAR 1111111111111111111111111111111111111

WINOR01534
Secretary
5.1.3DLBjECMjAMD
D.O. No. jf, Series of 2020
Prescribing Guidelines on the Design of Bicycle Facilities Along National Roads
Annex "A"
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
GUIDELINES ON THE DESIGN OF BICYCLE FACILITIES

ALONG NATIONAL ROADS
GUIDELINES ON THE DESIGN OF BICYCLE FACILITIES

ALONG NATIONAL ROADS
Contents
A. DEFINITION OF TERMS ........................................................................................................................ 1
B. BICYCLE FACILITY CLASSIFICATIONS ........................................................................................... 2
2. Class II: Separated Bike Lane using Pavement Markings or Physical Separation .................................... 2
3. Class III: Shared Roadway ........................................................................................................................ 2
C. GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR THE PROVISION OF BICYCLE FACILITIES ON EXISTING
ROADS AND BRIDGES ....................................................................................................................................... 2
1. Bicycle Facility Selection .......................................................................................................................... 2
2. Bicycle Operating Space for Road ............................................................................................................ 3
2.1 Establishing Width Criteria ................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Establishing Directional Criteria ........................................................................................................... 3
2.3 Separated Bike Lane using Pavement Markings or Physical Separator ................................................ 4
2.4 Cross-slope and Longitudinal Grade ..................................................................................................... 4
2.5 Vertical Clearance ................................................................................................................................. 4
3. Bicycle Operating Space for Bridge/Viaduct ............................................................................................ 4
3.1 Bridge/Viaduct ...................................................................................................................................... 4
3.2 Railings ................................................................................................................................................. 5
4. Conflict Areas ............................................................................................................................................ 5
4.1 Intersection ............................................................................................................................................ 5
4.2 Driveway and Commercial Properties .................................................................................................. 6
4.3 Transit Stops ......................................................................................................................................... 6
5. Grade Separated Crossings ........................................................................................................................ 6
5.1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge .............................................................................................................. 6
5.2 Pedestrian and Bicycle Tunnel/Underpass ............................................................................................ 7
6. Batas Pambansa BLG. 344 (Accessibility Law) ........................................................................................ 8
7. Road Signs and Pavement Markings ......................................................................................................... 8
8. Bikeway Facility Maintenance .................................................................................................................. 9
9. Bicycle Parking Facilities/Amenities ........................................................................................................ 9
9.1 Classification of Bicycle Parking Facilities .......................................................................................... 9
9.2 Criteria For Good Quality Bicycle Parking ........................................................................................ 10
9.3 Building Facility ................................................................................................................................. 11
9.4 Standard Bicycle Parking Dimensions ................................................................................................ 11
10. Existing Utilities ................................................................................................................................. 12
11. Lane Width Reduction for Road and Bridge ....................................................................................... 12
D. GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR THE PROVISION OF BICYCLE FACILITIES ON NEW
CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS AND BRIDGES ............................................................................................... 12
E. APPLICABILITY OF GUIDELINES OTHER THAN NATIONAL ROAD ......................................... 13
F. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS IN THE PROVISION OF BICYCLE FACILITIES ALONG
NATIONAL ROADS ........................................................................................................................................... 14
GUIDELINES ON THE DESIGN OF BICYCLE FACILITIES ALONG NATIONAL ROADS
A. DEFINITION OF TERMS – In line with the purpose of this Department Order, the following
terms or words and phrases shall mean or be understood as follows:
1. Active Transport – Refers to physical activity undertaken as a means of transport, such

as walking, cycling, or using other forms of light mobility for transportation.
2. Bicycle – A pedal-powered vehicle upon which the human operator sits. The term
“bicycle” for this guidelines includes two-wheeled human-powered vehicles.
3. Bicycle Facilities – A general term denoting improvements and provisions to
accommodate or encourage bicycling, including parking and storage facilities, and shared
roadways.
4. Bicycle Lane or Bike Lane - A portion of roadway that has been designated for
preferential or exclusive use by bicyclists or light mobility which is identified by pavement
markings, physical separator and/or signs. It is intended for one-way travel, usually in the
same direction as the adjacent traffic lane, unless designed as a contra-flow lane or two-
directional.
5. Bicycle Rack or Bike Rack – A stationary fixture to which a bicycle can be securely
attached.
6. Bicycle Route or Bike Route – A roadway or bikeway designated by the proper
authority, either with a unique route designation or with Bike Route signs, along which
bicycle guide signs may provide directional and distance information.
7. Bicycle Wheel Channel – A channel installed along the side of a stairway to facilitate
walking a bicycle up or down the stairs.
8. Bike Path – A completely separate roadway designated for the exclusive use of bicycles;
typically separated from motor-vehicle roadway by open space or barrier.
9. Conflict Areas – Refer to traffic zones involving the interaction of two or more road users
and can be classified as merging, diverging, or crossing conflicts.
10. Conflict Area Markings – Refer to pavement markings designed to improve bicyclist
visibility, alert all roadway users of expected behaviors, and to reduce conflicts with turning
vehicles.
11. Light Mobility – refers to travel using electronic or non-motorized vehicles (two wheels
attached to a frame, one behind the other) weighing not more than 100 kg.
12. Pedestrian – Refers to a person who is travelling on foot on a road, whether walking or
running. The term pedestrian also includes a person with disability who is moving on a
road in a wheelchair or similar conveyance.
13. Road-User – Anyone who uses a road, such as a pedestrian, cyclist or motorist.
14. Roadway or Carriageway – The portion of the highway, excluding shoulders, intended
for vehicular use.
15. Shared Roadway – A roadway that is open to both bicycle and motor vehicle travel.
16. Shared Roadway Marking – A pavement marking symbol that indicates an appropriate
bicycle positioning in a shared roadway.
Guidelines on the Design of Bicycle Facilities Along National Roads
Page 2 of 59
17. Shared Use Path – A bikeway physically separated from motor vehicle traffic by an open
space or barrier and either within the highway right-of-way or within an independent right-
of-way. Shared use paths may also be used by pedestrians, skaters, wheelchair users,
joggers, and other non-motorized users. Most shared use paths are designed for two-way
travel.
18. Sidewalk – That portion of a street or highway right-of-way, beyond the curb or edge of
roadway pavement, which is intended for use by pedestrians.
19. Transit Stop – Location where public transportation vehicles (i.e. bus, jeep or rail) will
stop to allow passengers to board or alight the transit vehicle.
B. BICYCLE FACILITY CLASSIFICATIONS – Bicycle facilities shall be classified into three

classes depending on the prevailing road and traffic conditions, to wit:
1. Class I: Shared Use Path or Bike Path – A designated path, completely separated
from the roadway, designated for the exclusive use of bicycles or shared with pedestrians;
typically separated from motor-vehicle roadway by open space such as on road sections
with wide sidewalk (Figure 1).
2. Class II: Separated Bike Lane using Pavement Markings or Physical Separation
- A portion of roadway which is designated for exclusive use by bicycle normally
distinguished by a paint stripe, curb or barrier. Separated bike lanes can use a variety of
separation methods, depending on cost, durability, safety and aesthetics. Separation types
can be used in combination to realize the full benefits of several treatments at a lower
overall cost (Figure 2).
3. Class III: Shared Roadway – A part of roadway that has been officially designated and
marked as bicycle route but can also be used by motor vehicle where there is limited
carriageway width (Figure 3).
C. GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR THE PROVISION OF BICYCLE FACILITIES ON

EXISTING ROADS AND BRIDGES
It is intended to present sound guidelines for the provision of bicycle facilities that will meet
the needs of bicyclists and other road users. These criteria and standards are subject to
modifications in exceptional cases wherein adoptation of minimum/desirable values along
existing roads could increase potential risk to the safety of all road users.
1. Bicycle Facility Selection – The graph for the preferred bicycle facility/accommodation
(Figure 4) shall be used in determining the appropriate facility choice, based on the
available data of motor vehicle volume and operating speed. Generally, the higher the
operating speed and volume of traffic on a road, the more protective bicycle facility is
recommended. Shared roadway is recommended for a road with operating the lowest
speed and traffic volume; separated bike lanes using pavement markings for low speed
and low to moderate volume; and separated bike lane using physical separation or shared
use paths for moderate to high speeds and high volumes. If enough space is not available
to provide the preferred bicycle facility at the prescribed design values, it will be necessary
to consider other bicycle facility classification and/or to provide a parallel facility per
engineering judgement taking into consideration the overall impacts on ridership, comfort,
safety, and overall network connectivity of all road users.
Page 3 of 59
2. Bicycle Operating Space for Road
2.1 Establishing Width Criteria

2.1.1 The minimum paved width for a shared use path is 3.0 m. However, if there
are physical constraints such as an environmental feature, bridge abutment,
utility structure, fence, etc., a path width of 2.44 m may be used for a short
distance. Typically, widths range from 3.0 to 4.3 m, with the wider values
applicable to areas with high use and/or a wider variety of user groups. The
preferred minimum roadway separation width to be divided into a travel-lane
and shared use path is 2.0 m (Figure 5).
2.1.2 The minimum width of a one-directional separated bike lane or bike path is
2.44 m to allow for bicyclists to travel side-by-side or pass each other without
leaving the lane. The bicyclists operating width is 1.22 m, which consist of
0.60 m width for physical dimension and 0.31 m for weaving space on each
side. Gutter should not be included in the measurement as usable width;
however, gutter may be used if the lane width cannot be achieved despite
narrowing all other travel lanes to their minimum widths (Figure 6).
2.1.3 The desirable width for a two-directional separated bike lane is 3.0 m. In
constrained condition, an absolute minimum width of 2.44 m may be allowed
(Figure 6).
2.1.4 A minimum of 2.44 m of ridable surface along shoulder should be available
for bicycle travel. An optional buffer space and application of rumble strip may
be used to provide additional horizontal distance between moving vehicles
and bicyclists (Figure 7).
2.1.5 Shared roadway type will be used along sections with roadway lane width
between 3.35 m and 4.2 m. Beyond this width, Bike Lanes or Shoulders may
be provided. Shared roadway is appropriate for low volume of traffic with
operating speed of 40 kph and below. Sometimes it may be used as a
temporary solution on constrained conditions, until additional right-of-way
can be acquired, but should not be considered a permanent solution in this
condition (Figure 8).
2.1.6 Existing sidewalk may be converted into a two-directional shared use path if
its width is greater than or equal to 3.0 m taking into consideration the
acceptable level of service for both pedestrians and cyclists; in constrained
conditions, 2.44 m may be allowed (Figure 9).
2.2 Establishing Directional Criteria
2.2.2 The decision in the selection of one-way or two-way bike lanes shall be based
on traffic lane configurations, bicycle demand, turning movement conflicts,
parking requirements, and surrounding bicycle route network options and
destinations, among others.
2.2.3 Selection of alignment decision for running the bike lane on the right-side,
left side, or in the center of the road, include considerations on transit stop
conflicts, intersection and driveway conflicts, locations of destinations, and
parking placement. The designer shall use the existing conditions and
surrounding network characteristics to evaluate the selection of directional
characteristics, using engineering judgement.
Page 4 of 59
2.3 Separated Bike Lane using Pavement Markings or Physical Separator
2.3.1 Along a continuous non-commercial section, pavement markings or

combination of flexible bollards/delineator posts with curbs shall be used to
designate an exclusive space for bicyclists (Figure 10).
2.3.2 In the event that physical separation is not feasible due to existing site
condition, a movable physical separator (Figure 11) may be considered as an
interim solution until such time, after adjusments and/or refinements, that a
final layout is achieved and a more permanent bike lane facility scheme
becomes feasible.
2.3.3 For areas where separated bike lanes are not feasible, more stringent
guidelines and protocols such as strict enforcement of speed limit, provision
of a dedicated traffic enforcer, etc., shall be defined and implemented to
accommodate mixed traffic.
2.4 Cross-slope and Longitudinal Grade
2.1.7 The cross-slope for shared use path or bike path must not exceed 2%. The
cross-slope of the separated bike lane must be the same as the slope of the
adjoining carriageway (Figure 12).
2.1.8 The longitudinal grade on shared use path or bike path should be limited to
5% maximum. The grade for separated bike lane must follow the roadway
grade (Figure 12).
2.5 Vertical Clearance
2.1.9 The vertical clearance to obstructions from signs, poles, trees or other fixed
objects is 2.5 m, preferred is 3.0 m. Fixed objects shall not be permitted to
protrude within the vertical or horizontal clearance of a shared use path or
bike path (Figure 13).
3. Bicycle Operating Space for Bridge/Viaduct
3.1 Bridge/Viaduct
3.1.1 Sidewalks with a minimum width of 3.0m shall be converted into a shared use
path (Figure 14).
3.1.2 Sidewalk with less than the required minimum width shall consider the
following options:
 Reduce travel lane to accommodate 1.22m bike path adjacent to the
existing raised sidewalk (Figure 15).
 Reduce travel lane to accommodate 2.44 shared use path by flushing
raised sidewalk to the roadway. Provide raised barrier between bicycle
and traffic lanes for low speed traffic (Figure 16) and combination railing
for high speed traffic (Figure 17).
 If 2.44m shared used path is not feasible, the existing travel lane shall
be converted into shared roadway (Figure18).
3.1.3 Bicycle facility attached to existing bridges (Figures 19 to 23):
 Where practicable to conform with the bike lane width provided on the
road, widen existing bridge sidewalks from 0.76m to a minimum of 3.0m
Page 5 of 59
to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle (shared-use) lanes by extending

abutment/pier supports under the bridge. Ensure the structure could
accommodate the additional loads (Figures 19 & 20);
 Dimensions of the attached bicycle bridge is the same as that of
independent bicycle bridge (item 5.1. Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge);
 Separation and clearances shall be considered if the attached bicycle
bridge is suspended below the bridge;
 Lighting from the adjacent bridge can be used for the bicycle bridge
lighting. If the bicycle bridge is suspended, special consideration shall be
given to provide adequate visibility.
 If the bicycle bridge is adjacent to the roadway bridge, create a contiguous
surface and install the barrier later. Concrete or asphalt surfaces are
preferable to steel decking;
 Ensure attached bicycle structure can be safely added to the existing
bridge.
3.2 Railings
3.2.1 To accommodate pedestrian and bicycle lanes on existing bridges, modify

existing bridge railings to conform to the minimum height and clear opening
requirements; see Figure 24 for sample modification of existing bridge
barrier/railing.
4. Conflict Areas - Green pavement markings shall be used along the length of a corridor
or in selected conflict locations where vehicles and bicycles are maneuvering at the same
time thru merging, weaving and crossing (Figure 25). These shall be provided on conflict
areas such as intersections, entrance/exit ramps, driveways, and transit stops per
engineering judgement.
4.1 Intersection – To ensure the smooth transition and safety of both road users,
intersection conflict areas shall be marked as follows:
4.1.1 Green-colored dashed pavement markings within a dashed bicycle lane

indicate areas where merging and weaving maneuvers are permitted. This
will decrease the chance of collisions as it allows motorists to merge when
there is a gap in bicycle traffic up to the intersection. Said markings shall be
dashed 15 to 70 meters in advance of intersection.
4.1.2 A colored conflict area (solid green road surface pavement markings) shall be
used inside of queuing area at intersections and bicycle priority areas in front
of driveways. Colored conflict area shall be placed/applied 4.5 to 9 meters
before intersection or inside of queuing area.
4.1.3 Dotted line extensions to indicate continuity and transitions. This can be
applied across intersections. Dotted lines shall be 150 mm (W) x 1000 mm
(L) with 1 m gap spacing. Markings shall be white, skid resistance and retro-
reflective.
4.1.4 The width of conflict area markings shall be as wide as the bike lanes,
provided before and/or after intersection/ramp. Merge or diverge lanes such
as ramp-style (entrance and exit lanes) or any other similar cases, typically
have intrinsic visibility problem due to low approach intersection angles.
Figure 26 shall be used as guide to highlight this potential conflict area.
Page 6 of 59
4.1.5 A bike box is a designated area located at the head of a traffic lane at a
signalized intersection that provides bicyclists with a safe and visible space to
get in front of queuing motorized traffic during the red signal phase (Figure
27). Motor vehicles must queue behind the white stop line at the rear of the
bike box.
 The bike box shall include a minimum length of 4.5 m and minimum
combined width of the bike lane, buffer space, and adjacent travel lane.
 On multilane streets (two lanes per direction) where left turns are allowed,
bike boxes may be extended across multiple travel lanes to facilitate
bicyclist left turn positioning.
 Bike box shall have a setback/offset of 1.2 m from the pedestrian crossing
to minimize encroachment by cyclists into the pedestrian crossing.
 Stop lines may be placed up to 2.0 m in advance of the bike box space to
limit encroachment by motor vehicles. A “WAIT HERE” legend marking
may be used to supplement the stop line sign in a bike box.
 A two-stage turn queue box may be an alternative approach to facilitating
left turns where there are multiple vehicle through lanes (three or more
lanes per direction). Two-stage turn queue box dimensions will vary based
on the street operating conditions, the presence or absence of a parking
lane, traffic volumes and speeds, and available street space. The turn box
may be placed in a variety of locations including in front of the pedestrian
crossing or at the tail end of a parking lane or a median island (Figure 28).
4.2 Driveway and Commercial Properties
4.2.1 Green pavement markings shall be used to identify the conflict area opposite
the driveway to make it clear that the bicycle has priority over the entering
and exiting vehicle/traffic. The length of colored conflict area shall be equal
to the opening of the driveway (Figure 29).
4.2.2 Green-colored dashed markings with bollards and a gap of 6 m shall be
provided to indicate conflict areas along a continuous
establishments/commercial properties (Figure 30).
4.3 Transit Stops
4.3.1 A separated bike lane with conflict to loading/unloading areas shall be

identified by green-colored pavement markings with crosswalks at the start
and a sign indicating that the bicyclist shall yield to pedestrians (Figure 31).
Buses must unload/load passengers without encroaching the Bicycle Lane.
4.3.2 If with a lay-by, the separated bike lane shall be routed behind the floating
transit platform. The minimum width of the transit platform is 2.5m. Railings
shall be installed along the edge of the island to restrict the pedestrians to
cross only at the crosswalk (Figure 32).
5. Grade Separated Crossings
5.1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge

5.1.1 For cyclists to safely use the bridge, minimum of 2.44m two-way cycling path
(in between railings) shall be applied.
Page 7 of 59
5.1.2 The expected number of cyclist using the bridge influences the deck width
(Figures 33 to 36).
5.1.3 When traveling uphill, additional width/space shall be applied – from extra
0.25m at regular speed to 0.8m at low speed.
5.1.4 For curve at high speed add an extra 0.5m to the total width.
5.1.5 For curve bridges, curve radius shall be in between 10m to 20m. If space is
limited, a minimum curve radius of 5m shall be used.
5.1.6 For ramps, avoid steep ramps and ramps that are too long.
5.1.7 The maximum grade for Bridge slope/ramp is 5%.
5.1.8 If space is limited and standard ramp is not possible the following alternatives
shall be used (Figures 37 & 38):
 Reduce the height difference
 choose a more compact ramp design
 Accept a steeper slope
 Alternatives to a slope.
5.1.9 If ramps are not an option, less user-friendly alternatives shall be used:
 a flight of steps with and adjacent bicycle stair access ramp (Figure 39)
 a bicycle escalator
5.1.10 A landing is required for a height difference of 3m or more, over 5m height
difference a landing of 25m in length is required before cyclist climb again.
5.1.11 If the bridge is accessible by maintenance vehicle, a semi-permanent access
restriction such as removable bollard shall be used. The load caused by
maintenance vehicle has to be taken into account.
5.1.12 For railings, the minimum height shall be 1100mm from the deck bridge
surface and with clear openings of 150mm to the lower 685mm to 200mm in
the upper portion of the railing.
5.1.13 Use local codes and regulations in computing the loads.
5.2 Pedestrian and Bicycle Tunnel/Underpass
5.2.1 The length of a tunnel must allow users to see from the entrance of the
tunnel/underpass exit.
5.2.2 The recommended minimum height in tunnels is 2.5m (Figure 40).
5.2.3 The recommended width is 3.5m if the tunnel is used only by cyclist, and
5.0m for pedestrian and bicycle use.
5.2.4 Minimum width of 3m shall be used for short tunnels with a maximum length
of 30m (Figure 41).
5.2.5 Maintenance vehicle shall be considered which will need a max height of 3m.
5.2.6 Make the approach to the tunnel straight from both sides. Make sure there
are no dark corners obscured from view.
5.2.7 Smooth curves in the construction elements instead of the traditional straight
angles can also increase the perception of social safety.
5.2.8 Lighting shall be provided in pathway tunnels and underpasses. Provide
brighter lighting during the day than at night.
5.2.9 Tunnels require good drainage (often pumped) and shall be designed easy to
clean.
Page 8 of 59
6. Batas Pambansa BLG. 344 (Accessibility Law)
6.1 Bicycle facilities shall be adjusted/constructed to provide access for the physically
impaired persons at the designated place in built-up areas along the project road, in
accordance to Batas Pambansa Blg. 344.
7. Road Signs and Pavement Markings
7.1 Road signs and pavement markings shall conform with the DPWH, Highway Safety
Design Standards Part 2: Road Signs and Pavement Markings Manual 2012, unless
otherwise stated (Figure 42).
7.1.1 W6-5 sign with a supplementary word sign "AHEAD" shall be placed not less
than 30m before the beginning of a bike lane.
7.1.2 W6-5 sign with a supplementary word sign "ENDS" shall be placed at the end
of a bike lane.
7.1.3 W6-5 and the supplementary word sign “AHEAD” and “ENDS” shall be used
only for Class I and Class II Bicycle Facilities.
7.1.4 R6-10 shall be used only in Class I and Class II Bicycle Facilities. It shall be
placed at the beginning of bike lane, at intersection and at periodic intervals.
Its periodic interval shall be determined by engineering judgement based on
prevailing speed of bicycle and other traffic, block length, distances from
adjacent intersections and other considerations. If there are multiple side
roads/turns exist, it is not required to locate signs at every turn. However,
sign spacing shall not exceed 500m.
7.1.5 A sign indicating the designated path of pedestrians and cyclist shall be placed
at the start of a Class I-Shared Use Path and at periodic intervals same as
described for R6-10 sign.
7.1.6 "SHARE THE ROAD" sign shall be placed at the start of a Class III-Shared
Roadway.
7.1.7 "RIGHT TURNER YIELD TO BIKES" shall be placed not less than 30m before
the intersection.
7.2 All overhead signs over a shared use path must have a vertical clearance of 2.5m
and be installed 0.60m from edge of path to the post. All signages along a shared
use path must be located at 0.60m from the edge of path to the edge of the signage
with a minimum vertical clearance of 1.5m from the bottom of signage to the top
surface of path (section 2.5.1).
7.3 Bicycle lane symbol and/or arrow markings (Figure 43) shall be placed in accordance
to the following requirements to remind motorists and pedestrians of the potential
presence of bicyclists, especially in areas where motorists are expected to cross bike
lanes along the facility based on engineering judgement and shall be maintained
periodically:
7.3.1 Bicycle lane symbol and/or arrow markings for shared use path and separated
bike lane using physical separators shall be placed at the beginning of a cycle
track, intersection and at periodic intervals of 100m minimum and not greater
than 300m.
7.3.2 Bicycle lane symbol and/or arrow markings for separated bike lane using
pavement markings shall be placed immediately after an intersection and
spaced at intervals of 50m minimum. In areas where motorists make parking
Page 9 of 59
maneuvers across bike lanes or where there is significant driveway density, it

may be appropriate to space the symbols as often as every 30m.
7.3.3 Shared-lane markings shall be placed immediately after an intersection and
spaced at intervals of 25m minimum and not greater than 76m. A “SHARE
THE ROAD” symbols on the pavement may be considered to alert motorists
and cyclists to share the road space.
7.4 The shared use path and bidirectional separated bike lane shall be separated with
solid white line pavement markings with width of 100mm and consideration of
appropriate informatory sign to guide and separate the cyclists from pedestrians and
other users along the path.
7.5 Bike Route Sign shall be used to identify the facility as a designated bicycle route. It
shall be placed at every 800 m on a major bike route and on the approach to major
bike routes. It can be supplemented with “fingerboard” panels showing destinations,
directions, and distances (Figure 44).
7.6 Roadside object or feature, with a diameter greater than 100mm that is located
within the path must be painted with reflectorized white or marked in accordance to
DPWH D.O. No. 73 Series of 2016 re: DPWH Standard For Object Markings, Markings
on Curb And Island, and Approach Markings to Islands And Obstruction.
8. Bikeway Facility Maintenance
8.1 Regular bicycle facility maintenance includes sweeping, maintaining a smooth

roadway surface, pavement markings, signages, and ensuring that the gutter-to-
pavement transition remains relatively flat, and installing bicycle friendly drainage
grates.
9. Bicycle Parking Facilities/Amenities
9.1 Classification of Bicycle Parking Facilities - The requirements for choosing a

location for the site of the facility will be based on the use whether it is a short-term
or long-term. Each of these parking types has unique site design requirements that
will affect the kinds of fixtures to be installed in these facilities.
9.1.1 Short-Term Bicycle Parking Facility - This type of facility focuses on

convenience, utility and the security for the basic bicycle rack. It usually
defined a parking period of two hours or less, parking racks shall be
convenient to the destination of the cyclist, must be within 15 meters of the
main entrance to the building, or entrances that are frequently used by
cyclists, visible to the cyclist, located in areas of high pedestrian activity and
along the line adjacent the bikeways, well distributed, and sheltered or
unsheltered. (see Figure 45)
 Bicycle Rack Design
o There are certain key features in designing a bicycle rack that will
determine their quality and sustainability. One is the materials to be
used; galvanized steel or industrial grade materials are prescribed.
Wood, soft metals, untreated metals that will rust, brittle cast
composite that may crack under impact and stainless steel that do
Page 10 of 59
not weld strongly should be avoided. It shall also have a smooth outer
surface that will not damage or scratch bicycle frames.
o Two point contact between the bicycle and the rack rather than one
point contact to allow both frame and at least one wheel to be locked
to the rack and supports the bicycle (Figure 46).
o It shall be space efficient to allow many bicycles to be parked in a
small area and also provide adequate space to facilitate parking and
locking.
o Sheltered racks or covered bicycle parking protects the bicycle from
weather and provide protection from accidental damages.
 Installation
o All bicycle racks shall be firmly secured to the ground or floor by

bolting them to a hard surface or fixing them in concrete. Concrete
is a preferred surface for maximum security although other surfaces
may also be appropriate.
9.1.2 Long-Term Bicycle Parking Facility - This bicycle parking facility suggests
an all day, overnight or longer duration parking period. The level of security
and protection from the elements shall be high, but immediate convenience
of the parking facility may not be as important. Bicycle racks are in an
enclosed, secured area with controlled access or individual, secure enclosures
or bicycle lockers. The facility may also include bike rentals and repairs,
toilets, showers and lockers, easy link to transit and a variety of other services
(Figure 47).
 Bicycle cages -Bicycles are locked to racks that are installed inside a
cage. Through the use of an electronic key pad, security pass card or
similar type of system restrict access to bicycle parking racks (Figure 48).
 Toilet/Shower/Change Facilities - The presence of toilet, shower and

changing facilities in non-residential areas is good motivators for people
to make use of bicycles as a form of transportation. People find these
facilities of interest especially among commuters who experience long
daily travels from home to their place of work or study especially if they
are required to observe certain dress codes. In the design of such
facilities, special consideration should be taken in terms of the
proportion/ratio of long-term users of bicycle parking in the site as well as
the number of shower stalls to be installed. Usually, the standard dictates
one shower stall for every four or less bicycle parking spaces (Figure 49).
9.2 Criteria For Good Quality Bicycle Parking - Although there are wide variety of
design strategies that can be used to implement good quality bicycle parking, there
are three main criteria that must be satisfied.
9.2.1 Accessibility
 No obstacles like steep slopes

 Separate, dedicated bicycle ramps into parking areas are desirable
 Way - finding signage
Page 11 of 59
9.2.2 Safety and Security
 Bike parking areas shall be reserved for use by bikes only. Regular
monitoring is required for signs of damage to bicycles or racks and
misuse such as storing items other than bicycles.
 Racks or lockers made from high quality materials firmly secured to the
ground, floor or wall
 Regularly monitored by security personnel
 Keeping the area free from garbage
 Located in a well- lit area
 Short – term parking: located in a busy, public area to increase informal
surveillance
 Long - term parking: Located in a separate, access controlled areas
9.2.3 Convenience
 Easy to locate and access

 Easy to use
 Wherever possible, situated close to bicycle friendly routes.
9.3 Building Facility
9.3.1 Construction of building facility for bicycle shall conform with the
Implementing Rules and regulations of the Philippine National Building Code
and Local Government Ordinances.
9.4 Standard Bicycle Parking Dimensions
9.4.1 Parallel Parking to the road/street
 Orienting the bike racks parallel to the street requires less total area to
park bicycles and allow to pedestrian walkways. For the design, begin by
setting the bike rack back 600mm from the curb.
 Multiple bike racks shall be spaced 1.8 m. (min.1.20m) between the
nearest legs, 900mm – 1.2 meters shall be allowed between walls
obstruction and the nearest leg of the bike rack.
 The pedestrian walkway is then created by setting the racks 2.4 meters
from the wall measured to the center of the rack (Figure 50).
9.4.2 Perpendicular Parking Layout to the road/street
 When orienting the bike racks perpendicular to the road/street, requires

by installing the recommended distance of 1.2 meters (min. 900mm) from
the curb. This is measured to the center of the bike rack. Distance to the
near leg of the rack, the bike rack shall have an offset of 900mm (min.
600mm) from the curb.
 When the bicycle is properly secured, the frame and wheel locked to the
rack, the distance from the curb will allow for enough space for the
remainder of the bicycle without extending into the street.
 Bike racks shall be placed 1.2 meters (min. 900mm) from each other,
measured from the center of the rack.
Page 12 of 59
 A clearance of 900mm (min. 600mm) from walls or other obstructions will

allow enough space to maneuver the bicycle into the rack, as well as an
access from the side to lock/unlock the bike from the rack.
 A setback of 3.3 meters from buildings/walls to the bike racks. This will
create a 1.8 meters walkway for pedestrian traffic (Figure 51).
9.4.3 Bike Parking Lot Layout (Figure 52)
 When designing a layout that will create a bike parking lot, consisting of
multiple columns of bike racks, one key is to ensure there is a usable aisle
between the rows of racks. This will let cyclists easily flow in and out of
the bike parking area and racks specifically.
 You can start in a corner and place the first rack 900mm (min. 600mm)
from a parallel wall. Then set it back 600mm – 900mm from the
perpendicular wall, measured to the nearest leg. This distance is needed
to allow space for the wheel and frame to align with the rack for proper
locking. The parallel distance between the 2 racks is 1.2m (900mm min.)
while the perpendicular distance between the 2 racks is 2.4m (1.8m).
 Setbacks to the perpendicular walls can also be measured at 900mm –
1200mm to the center of the rack.
10. Existing Utilities
10.1 Existing utility covers shall be adjusted flushed with the surface of the roadway
pavement. Bike lanes should be provided with adequate drainage (bicycle-compatible
drain grates) to prevent ponding of water, washouts, debris accumulation, and other
potential concerns for bicyclists. All existing drainage gratings shall be adjusted
perpendicular to the traffic (Figure 53).
11. Lane Width Reduction for Road and Bridge
11.1 Implementation of lane width reduction for road and bridge that is purposively for
the provision of space for bicycle lanes will only be allowed to a minimum widths of
3.05 m and 3.35 m taking into consideration the design vehicle type, respectively, in
exceptional situation applicable only for urban roads with high volume and low speed
of traffic.
D. GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR THE PROVISION OF BICYCLE FACILITIES ON NEW

CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS AND BRIDGES
All projects of DPWH that involve new road and bridge construction or future expansion to
relieve traffic congestions such as road/bridge widening, diversion/bypass roads, among
others, shall include in its design the provision of bicycle facility that meet the mandatory
conditions stated above. Exemptions to the provisions of this Order may be allowed, subject
to the evaluation by the Bureau of Design and approval of the Undersecretary for Techincal
Services.
1. Forms of Separation - The selection of physical separation type(s) for bike lane in new
road construction shall be based on the available right-of-way limit, cost, aesthetics,
Page 13 of 59
maintenance, motorized traffic volumes, speeds and safety of road users, among others.
The types of separation that may be used are shown in Figure 54 A combination of
these treatments may be used along a corridor to achieve the full benefits of each
separation type. The benefits of each type are compared in table under Figure 54.
2. Bicycle Operating Space for Road – For all road and bridge infrastructure projects
to be implemented by DPWH, the minimum width to be adopted for a one-directional
separated bike lane shall be 2.44m for all conditions.
3. Bicycle Operating Space for Bridge/Viaduct

2.1 Bike and Pedestrian Lanes shall be added to the standard plans of all bridge
designs (Figure 55).
2.2 Dimension of bike and pedestrian lanes shall conform to the minimum required
criteria of this guidelines.
2.3 Surface Conditions:
2.3.1 The decking shall be relatively smooth but non-skid.

2.3.2 Special attention shall be paid to expansion joints, longitudinal gaps,
longitudinally grooved pavement, and honeycomb steel decking.
2.4 Railing:
2.4.1 The minimum height of bike and pedestrian railing shall be 1100mm
measured from the top of walkway and riding surface.
2.4.2 It is recommended to use the 2018 DPWH Standard Bridge Railing.
2.4.3 For low speed traffic (speeds not exceeding 60kph), a combination
traffic-pedestrian/bicycle railing shall be used with raised barrier as
separator.
2.4.4 For high speed traffic (speeds in excess of 60kph), separated bike and
pedestrian lane or shared use path shall be used. Traffic or combination
railing shall be used as separator; combination or pedestrian railing shall
be used on the outer edge of sidewalk (Figure 56).
2.4.5 For bike and pedestrian railings, 150mm clear opening shall apply to
the lower 685mm of the railing, and the spacing in the upper portion
shall be such that 200mm dia. sphere shall not pass through.
2.4.6 New traffic bridge parapet/railings shall satisfy crash testing
requirements to confirm that they meet structural and geometric
requirements of a specified railing test level using the test criteria
specified in Article 18.3.2 of DPWH DGCS Vol.2 Bridge Design S. 2015.
E. APPLICABILITY OF GUIDELINES OTHER THAN NATIONAL ROAD
To achieve consistency in the functionality and quality of cycling infrastructure that will be used
in active public transport across the Philippines, the design of all cycling infrastructure in the
country which include both Government roads and private roads shall adhere to the above
technical and performance standards.
Page 14 of 59
F. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS IN THE PROVISION OF BICYCLE FACILITIES ALONG

NATIONAL ROADS
1. Prior to implementation of Bicycle Facilities, a Feasibility Study (FS) shall be undertaken

by the concerned implementing agency to evaluate its applicability both on new and
existing roads, taking into consideration the following, among others:
1.1 Evaluation of the geometric and operational conditions of the roads, given the traffic
volume, operating speed, and the preferred bicycle facilities necessary to ensure the
safety of cyclists.
1.2 A study on the forecasted project utilization and mode choice (number of motorized
users shifting to bicycle) to ensure that the implementation of bicycle facilities will not
gravely affect the expected and existing capacity and level of service of the roads.
Pursuing the said project without analyzing this consideration might result to severe
unstable traffic conditions/operations of the roadway or the adjacent road network and
may seriously compromise the safety of all road users.
2. A more stringent guidelines and protocols such as strict enforcement of speed limit,
provision of a dedicated traffic enforcer, etc., to include monitoring and reporting of its
compliance shall be established, fully defined and implemented to accommodate mixed
traffic. Any road users who jeopardize the safety of other users shall be subject to
sanctions/disciplinary actions defined and accepted by the proper authority; and
3. Appropriate advertisement and information dissemination of rules and regulations in the
implementation and right usage for bicycle facilities shall be undertaken to increase
understanding and awareness to all road users regarding the said facilities.
Page 15 of 59
Prepared by DPWH Technical Workings Group:
Head
Members
A
egional Director, National Capital Region
(11m
DIA c'HUA...
hief, Planning and Design Division, DPWH-NCR
Concurred by: Approved by:

J
E
Unders
UPMO Operations a Technical Services
Page 16 of 59
Figure 1. CLASS I (Shared Use Path or Bike Path)
Figure 2. CLASS II (Separated Bike Lane)
Figure 3. CLASS III (Shared Roadway)

Page 17 of 59
Figure 4. Bicycle Facility Selection

Page 18 of 59
Figure 5. Establishing Width Criteria for Class I (Shared Use Path or Bike Path)
Figure 6. Establishing Width Criteria for Class II (Separated Bike Lane using Physical Separator)
Page 19 of 59
Figure 7. Establishing Width Criteria for Class II (Separated Bike Lane using Pavement Markings)
Figure 8. Establishing Width Criteria for Class III (Shared Roadway

Page 20 of 59
Figure 9. Existing Sidewalk (to be converted into shared use path)

Page 21 of 59
2440 2440
Figure 10. Separated Bike Lane Using Pavement Markings and Physical Separator (1 of 3)
Page 22 of 59
Page 23 of 59
REFLECTORIZED (ORANGE)
Page 24 of 59
Figure 11. Temporary Physical Separator (1 of 2)

Page 25 of 59
Figure 11. Temporary Physical Separator (2 of 2)

Page 26 of 59
Figure 12. Cross-Slope and Longitudinal Grade

Page 27 of 59
Figure 13. Vertical Clearance

Page 28 of 59
At least 3.0m At least 3.0m
Shared-Use Path
Existing Sidewalk
Figure 14. Existing Sidewalks Can Be Utilized as One-Directional Shared-Use Path

1.10
0.90
m
EXISTING SIDEWALK ADDITIONAL BIKE LANE RAISED 3.05-3.35m

BARRIER TRAVEL LANE
Figure 15. Separated Bike Lane applicable for low speed facilities
1. Modify bridge railing height and clear openings to combination traffic-pedestrian railing.
2. Lane width reduction can be applied to multi-lane bridges to accommodate at least 1 bicycle lane facility of
1.22m on both sides provided that the minimum traffic lane width should not be less than 3.05m/3.35m.
Page 29 of 59
1.10m
MODIFIED EXISTING SHARED USE PATH RAISED 3.05M - 3.35M

RAILING BARRIER TRAVEL LANE
Figure 16. Shared Use Path applicable for low speed facilities
1. Modify clear openings

2. Travel lane reduced to 3.05m/3.35m
3. Remove existing raised sidewalk
4. Additional bike lane with raised barrier between bike and travel lanes
1.10m
1.10m
MODIFIED EXISTING SHARED USE PATH COMBINATION TRAFFIC- 3.05M - 3.35M

RAILING PEDESTRIAN RAILING TRAVEL LANE
Figure 17. Shared Use Path applicable for high-speed facilities

Page 30 of 59
EXISTING SIDEWALK SHARED ROADWAY
Figure 18. Shared Roadway on Existing Bridges
Image from NZ Transport Agency
Figure 19. Deck Level Shared-Use Path with Widening

Page 31 of 59
LIGHTING
POLE
Image from NZ Transport

Agency
Figure 20. Deck Level Shared-Use Path with Widening
Figure 21. Attached Bike and Pedestrian Bridge to Existing Bridge - Deck
Page 32 of 59
Figure 22. Attached Bike and Pedestrian Bridge to Existing Bridge - Pier Cap
CLEARANCE
Figure 23. Attached Bike and Pedestrian Bridge to Existing Bridge - Pier
Page 33 of 59
Figure 24. Existing Bridge Railing Modification
*from the existing 0.9m railing height, add steel rail mounted of top of concrete railing.
*provide at least 25mm dia. plain bars to the existing clear openings.
Page 34 of 59
Figure 25. Minor Intersection Conflict Area Markings

Page 35 of 59
Entrance Exit
Figure 26. Merging and Diverging Conflict Area Markings

Page 36 of 59
Figure 27. Bike Box

Page 37 of 59
Figure 28. Two-Stage Turn Queue Box

Page 38 of 59
Figure 29. Conflict Area Markings along Driveway
Figure 30. Conflict Area Markings along Continous Commercial Properties/Establishments

Page 39 of 59
Figure 31. Transit Stop Loading and Unloading Bay
Figure 32. Transit Stop Loading and Unloading Bay (with Transit Platform)
Figure 32. Transit Stop Loading and Unloading Bay (with Transit Platform)
Page 40 of 59
Figure 33. Minimal Width for Cyclist Figure 34. One-Way Bicycle Path
Figure 35. Two-Way Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge

Page 41 of 59
Figure 36. Two-Way Bicycle on Slope/Ramp
Figure 37. Height Difference Reduction

Page 42 of 59
Figure 38. Compact and Steeper Ramp

Page 43 of 59
Figure 39. Bicycle Access Ramp Details

Page 44 of 59
Figure 40. Tunnel/underpass for pedestrian and cyclist
Figure 41. Minimum Section in Tunnels on Cycle Paths

Page 45 of 59
Figure 42 Roads Signs for Bicycle Facilities

Page 46 of 59
Figure 43. Bicycle lane symbol and/or arrow markings

Page 47 of 59
Figure 44. Bicycle lane symbol and/or arrow markings

Page 48 of 59
Figure 45. Short-term bicycle parking facility

Page 49 of 59
0.90 meter 1.00 meter
Figure 46. Bicycle Rack Design

Page 50 of 59
Figure 47. Long-Term Parking Layout

Page 51 of 59
Table 48. Bicycle Cage

Page 52 of 59
Figure 49. Toilet/Shower/Change Facilities (1 of 2)

Page 53 of 59
Figure 49. Toilet/Shower/Change Facilities (2 of 2)
FLOOR PLAN OF COMPLETE FACILITIES (TOILET, SHOWER / CHANGING CUBICLE AND LAYOUT FOR SHORT-
TERM & LONG-TERM PARKING)
NOTE: THE SIZE OF THE FACILITIES BASED ON THE AVAILABLE SITE/LOCATION

Page 54 of 59
Figure 50. Parallel Parking Layout to the Road/Street
Figure 51. PerpendicularParking Layout to the Road/Street

Page 55 of 59
Figure 52. Bicycle Parking Lot Layout

Page 56 of 59
Figure 53. Bicycle Safe Stormwater Grates

Page 57 of 59
FLEXIBLE BOLLARD RAISED OR

CURB PLANT BOX CONCRETE BARRIER
POST LANDSCAPED MEDIAN
1. Appropriate  Lower-speed  Lower-speed  Lower-speed environments;  Recommended for Recommended for locations
Context environments; may not be environments; may not be planter boxes with periodic or locations where more where more physical
appropriate for roads with appropriate for roads with intermittent spacing are not physical protection from protection from motor
posted speeds that exceed posted speeds that exceed appropriate on roads with motor vehicles is needed, vehicles is needed; for
50kph. 50kph. posted speeds of 50kph or such as bridges with high- example, on bridges with
 Recommended treatment greater. speed traffic. high-speed traffic.
adjacent to motor vehicle  If planter boxes are used on  Should not be used with
parking to allow access. roads with posted speeds of on-street parking
50kph or greater, they should
be constructed of a durable
material and should not be
periodic or intermittently
spaced unless they are placed
on top of a concrete median or
adjacent to a median or curb
to provide continuous physical
protection.
 If they are used on roads
where operating speeds are
different from posted speeds,
the design should be adjusted
accordingly.
2. Cost  Lowest initial capital cost  Low cost  High cost, including ongoing  Relatively low initial capital  Higher initial capital cost
but may need routine maintenance for re-positioning cost compared to other but requires less long-term
replacement, resulting in and possible seasonal types of separation maintenance than other
higher long-term costs removable. types of separation
3. Design  Easily removed and  Easily removed and  Easily removed and relocated  Relatively low flexibility  Relatively low flexibility
Flexibility relocated relocated  If they are used on roads with
posted speeds of 50kph or
less, there is more flexibility in
their design.
4. Design Notes  Small footprint compatible  Can be used in narrower  Can add to the aesthetics and  Intended to provide  Intended to provide
with a range of buffer buffers than other types of enjoyment of the facility continuous vertical continuous vertical
designs. separation.  Planters with intermittent separation. separation.
 Should be combined with  Must be pinned down. spacing that are not separated  On higher speed roads,  On higher speed roads,
buffered bicycle lane  Consider use of end from adjacent motor vehicle crash cushions should be crash cushions should be
pavement markings. treatments such as mini- lanes should consider clear included at barrier ends. included at barrier ends.
 Allows drainage and snow barrier noses. zone.  Less aesthetically pleasing  Can add to the aesthetics
storage.  Must have vertical element  Should have reflective than other types of and enjoyment of the
 Appearance is less at least at the start when markings or be signed. separation facility
‘permanent’ than other adjacent to traffic; may
forms and may be less need additional vertical
aesthetically pleasing elements to enhance
visibility.
5. Durability  Low Durability  High Durability  Relatively high durability,  High Durability  High Durability
depends on material used.
6. Protection  May increase user comfort  Can be used to provide  Moderate to high degree of  Provide a high degree of  Can provide a continuous
but does not offer physical continuous protection, but protection, depending n separation and physical curb separation from
protection low height provides less spacing and material used. protection from motor motor vehicles, though
protection than other  The face pf the planter vehicles may include gaps or inlets
types of separation. exposed to traffic may be for channelizing
rounded to better absorb the stormwater towards
energy of an impact. The existing catch basins in
planter should not be retrofit facilities.
anchored to the pavement
and should have sufficient
mass to absorb the energy of
an impact without significant
deflection.
7. Maintenance  Can be impacted if buffer  Low maintenance  High maintenance  Low maintenance  Low maintenance
space is used for snow requirements requirements; likely to requirements requirements
storage. require ongoing care and land
 Susceptible to damage and scaping
may need to be frequently
replaced.
8. Line of Sight  Minimal impacts  Minimal impacts  Need t ensure they do not  Minimal impacts  Need to ensure they do not
restrict clear zone restrict clear zone
requirements and sightlines, requirements and
particularly on roads with sightlines, particularly on
higher motor vehicle speeds roads with higher motor
vehicle speeds.
9. Spacing  Spaced 3.0 to 6.0 meters  May be spaced closer to  May be spaced closer to  Continuous with breaks for  Continuous, with breaks
apart. create a continuous create a continuous barrier. emergency access as for emergency access as
 Spacing may be dependent barrier.  If spaced apart, spacing needed needed
on factors such as parking  If spaced apart, spacing should be even along the
and loading encroachment. should be even along the corridor
 Generally placed in the corridor. Spaced 2.5m to
middles of the buffer area 3.5m apart.
but may be positioned to
one side or the other as site
conditions indicate
Figure 54. Bike Lane Physical Separator

Page 58 of 59
Standard Bridge Design
SIDEWALK TRAFFIC LANE TRAFFIC BIKE LANE

BIKE LANE LANE SIDEWALK
Standard Bridge Design with Shared Use Path

u
*an absolute minimum width of 2.44 may be used in constrained condition
Figure 55. Proposed Standard Bridge Design
TRAFFIC OR
COMBINATION RAILING
PEDESTRIAN OR
COMBINATION
RAILING
SIDEWALK BIKE LANE SEPARATOR TRAVEL LANE
SHARED USE PATH
*separator:
-high speed traffic – traffic or combination railing
-low speed traffic – raised barrier
Figure 56. Bridge Barrier/Railing
Page 59 of 59
References:
American Association Of State Highways And Transportation Officials. Guide For The
Development Of Bicycle Facilities. 2012.
American Association Of State Highways And Transportation Officials. Guide For The Planning,
Design, And Operation Of Bicycle Facilities, February 2010
Auckland Harbour Bridge Shared Path Single Stage Business Case January 2020, Version 4.0
Bicycle Access Ramp By Fixation
Bridge Rails And Barriers A Reference Guide For Transportation Projects In The Coastal Zone
Brief Dutch For Bicycle And Pedestrian Bridges By Ipv Delft, June 2015
Empire State Trail Design Guide, 2017.
Federal Highway Administration. Implementing Bicycle Improvements At The Local Level,
Publication NO. FHWA-98-105 1998
Federal Highway Administration. Bikeway Selection Guide, 2019.
Federal Highway Administration. Course On Bicycle And Pedestrian Transportation, Lesson 13,
Walkways, Sidewalks, And Public Spaces
Federal Highway Administration. Incorporating On-Road Bicycle Networks Into Resurfacing
Projects
Federal Highway Administration. Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 2009.
Federal Highway Administration. Separated Bike Lane Guide, 2015.
Massdot Separated Bike Lane Planning & Design Guide
National Association Of City Transportation Officials. Urban Bikeway Design Guide. 2012.
Toronto. Guide for the Design and Management of Bicycle Parking Facilities, 2008.
jj;O. NO ..2.£ senes or-2u2tJ
Prescribing Guidelines on the Design of Bicycle Facilities Along National Roads
Annex "8"
Pagel of 1
REQUEST FORM FOR APPROVAL OF NON-IMPLEMENTATION OF BICYCLE FACILITIES FOR

NEW CONSTRUCTION ALONG NATIONAL ROADS
LJate: _
FOR UNDERSECRETARY FOR TECHNICAL SERVICES
THRU DIRECTOR
Bureau of Design
1. Project Location
2. Implementing Office
3. Scope of Work of the Project
(attach typical section)

4. Reason for Non-Implementation of Bicycle Facility
4.1. Not adaptable to site condition

4.1.1. Involving Road-Right-of-Way (RROW) constraints
• Provide Vicinity Map showing the location and RROW limit of the
project.
• Details of the proposed roadway typical section
4.1.2. Affected by existing structures/obstructions
• Photographs of existing structures i.e. trees, posts, etc.
4.1.3. Desirable bicycle facilities as per traffic volume and operating speed
cannot be implemented
• Provide latest tra.ffic data and operating speed
• Details of the proposed roadway typical section
4.2. Other reason(s): _
Requested by:
Regional Director/District Engineer
The request was found to be meritorious! hence approval hereof is respectfully recommended.
Division Chief Division Chief

Chief, Highways Division Chief, Bridges Division
Recommeding Approval: Approved:
Director
DPWH Bureau of Design Undersecretary for Technical Services
~'" (3 tJA..l/J
Republic of the Philippines /D - Of _J.o:;:V
Manila
OCT 0 6 2020
DEPARTMENT ORDER ) SUBJECT GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES IN
TERMINATING CONTRACTS DUE TO
NO.
90 ~
)
THE FAULT OF THE CONTRACTOR FOR
LOCALLY FUNDED INFRASTRUCTURE
PROJECTS
Series of 2020<P'··.,g·~)
Pursuant to the provisions of Annex I of the 2016 Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations
of Republic Act No. 9184 entitled "Guidelines on Termination of Contract", and in order to
establish a uniform processing thereof, the following guidelines and procedures in terminating
contracts due to the fault of the contractor for locally funded infrastructure projects is hereby
issued.
I. RATIONALE
This policy aims to ensure compliance of the Implementing Offices in executing the
process of terminating contracts as provided in Annex I of the 2016 Revised IRR (RIRR)
of Republic Act (RA) No. 9184 and to prevent any violation of the Implementing Office
which may nullify the approved Contract Termination. Further, this policy will address
the confusion on who should approve the Contract Termination and the common lapses
committed by the Implementing Offices such as, but not limited to, non-attachment of
the Verified Report in issuing to the contractor the Notice to Terminate Contract,
repeated issuance of the Notice to Terminate Contract, lack of proof to establish that
the Notice to Terminate Contract was duly. received by the Contractor.
II. SCOPE AND APPLICATION
This gUidelines and procedures shall be applicable only for termination of contracts that
are locally funded (LFP) as implemented by the Central, Regional or District Engineering
Office.
This DO shall likewise be applicable only for termination of contracts due to the fault of
the contractor for grounds provided in Item III(A)(2) of Annex I of the 2016 Revised
IRR of RA 9184, except for Section III hereof, Delegated Authority, which shall be
applicable with all other grounds for termination of contract.
Termination of foreign funded contracts and/or for grounds other than the default of
the contractor shall be governed by the provisions of their contract, prevailing laws,
rules and regulations as may be applicable.
DEPARTMENT ORDER NO. 10- ,
SERIES 2020
GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES IN TERMINATING CONTRACTS DUE TO THE FAULT
OF THE CONTRACTOR FOR LOCALLY FUNDED INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
Page 2 of 6
III. DELEGATEDAUTHORITY
The authority to approve the termination of contract for the grounds provided in item II
hereof, and other grounds for termination as provided in Section III Annex I of the 2016
Revised IRR of RA 9184, irrespective of the amount, are hereby delegated as follows:
A. For Central (UPMO/Bureau) Projects - the Undersecretary for UPMO and/or

Technical Services;
B. For Regional Projects - The incumbent Regional Director for those contracts
entered by the Regional Office; and
C. For District Projects - The incumbent District Engineer for those contracts
entered by the DEO
The above-stated DPWH Official shall be considered as the Head of the IO for purposes
of this D.O.
IV. PROCEDURE FOR TERMINATION
A. Duty of the Project Engineer
It shall be the duty of the Project Engineer to prepare a written report (Annex 6)
informing the Head of the Implementing Office of the existence of a ground for
termination with a recommendation for the issuance of a Notice to Terminate
Contract against the contractor, citing reasons thereto and complete submission of
the supporting documents within the period as stated hereunder.
1. For Default due to Neaative Sliooage of 15% while the Project is On-aoina-
Upon reaching the terminal stage (Negative Slippage of 15%) as provided in
D.O. 193 S. 2016 but priorto th"e issuance of the Terminal Stage (Notice to
Terminate) and submission of documents in Annex 7 hereof;
2. Due to the Contractor's Fault and after the contract time exoired, it incurred a
neaative sliooaae often oercent (10%) or more in the comoletion of the work.
- Within three (3) calendar days after reaching 10% negative slippage and
upon submission of documents in Annex 7 hereof;
3. Contractor abandons the contract works, refuses or fails to comolv with a valid
instruction of the Procurina Entity or fails to oroceed exoeditiouslv and without
delav desoite a Written Notice bv the Procurina Entity - Within three (3)
calendar days after such act of the contractor has been discovered and upon
submission of documents prOVided in Annex 7 hereof;
4. Contractor does not actuallv have on the oroject site the minimum essential
eauipment listed on the Bid necessarv to orosecute the Works in accordance
with the aoprove work olan and eauioment deolovment schedule as reauired
for the oroject - Within three (3) calendar days after lapse of the period
proVided by the Project Engineer in the Site Instruction or in the letter of the
DEPARTMENT ORDER NO. 'I'D ..
SERIES 2020
GUIDEliNES AND PROCEDURES IN TERMINATING CONTRACTS DUE TO THE FAULT
OFTHE CONTRACTOR FOR LOCALLY FUNDED INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
. Page 3 of 6
Head of 10 to provide the minimum essential equipment, and upon submission

of documents provided in Annex 7 hereof;
5. Contractor does not execute the Works in accordance with the contract or
oersistentlv or f1aGrantlvnealects to earlY out its obliGationsin the contract-
Within three (3) calendar days after lapse of the period provided by the Project
Engineer in the Site Instruction or in the letter of the Head of 10 to execute the
works in accordance with the contract, and upon submission of documents
provided in Annex 7 hereof;
6. Contractor nealects or refuses to remove materials or to oerform a new work

that has been rejected as defective or unsuitable- Within three (3) calendar
days after the lapse of the period provided by the Project Engineer in the Site
Instruction or in the letter of the Head of 10 to remove materials or to perform
a new work that has been rejected as defective or unsuitable, and upon
submission of documents provided in Annex 7 hereof;
7. Contractor sub-lets anv oart of the contract works without the approval bv the
ProcurinG Entitv - Within three (3) calendar days after such act of the
contractor has been discovered and upon submission of documents provided in
Annex 7 hereof.
B. Duty of the Implementing Unit/Inspectorate Team
1. Upon receipt of the Project Engineer's written report recommending the

issuance of a Notice to Terminate, or upon its own initiative, the Head of 10
shall instruct the Implementing Unit/Inspectorate Team to verify within seven
(7) calendar days the existence of such ground/s and thereafter and submit a
notarized Verified Report (use form provided in Annex 5), together with all the
relevant supporting documents thereof (Annex 7);
2. The Head of Implementing Unit/Inspectorate Team shall set forth in the

Verified Report its findings as to the existence of grounds or causes for
termination and explicitly stating its recommendation for the issuance of a
Notice to Terminate Contract.
3. If the Verified Report recommends the issuance of a Notice to Terminate

against the contractor, it shall be submitted to the Head of the 10 together with
the complete supporting documents required in Item A hereof.
C. Issuance of Notice to Terminate
1. Within three (3) calendar days upon receipt of the Verified Report and the
required supporting documents, the Head of the 10 shall issue a Notice to
Terminate Contract to the concerned contractor (Annex 1).
2. The Notice to Terminate shall state the following:
a. the contract is being terminated for any of the ground/s aforementioned,

and a statement of the acts that constitute the ground/s constituting the
same;
DEPARTMENT ORDER NO. qtJ· . SERIES 2020
GUIDEUNES AND PROCEDURES IN TERMINATING CONTRACTS DUE TO THE FAULT
OFTHE CONTRACTOR FOR LOCALLY FUNDED INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
. Page 4 of 6
b. the extent of termination, whether in whole or in part;

c. an instruction to the Contractor to show cause as to why the contract
should not be terminated;
d. the contractor shall submit its verified position paper within seven (7)
calendar days upon the receipt of the Notice to Terminate together with
pertinent evidence to support its claim and that failure to do so shall cause
the issuance of the termination of contract;
e. to show cause why the erring contractor should not be suspended and/or
blacklisted in accordance with AppendiX 17 of the RIRR;
f. the Verified Report is attached in this Notice and
g. special instructions, if any.
3. The Notice to Terminate shall always be accompanied by the notarized

Verified Report of the Implementing Unitl Inspectorate Team. The
Records Section of the 10 or the Project Engineer shall forward the said Notice
to Terminate to the concerned contractor on its official business address as
indicated in the contract agreement personally or through any legitimate
courier. Likewise, the Records Section/ Project Engineer shall secure a proof of
delivery from the said courier who delivered the aforesaid notice or shall
execute a proof of service if forwarded personally;
D. Show Cause
Within a period of seven (7) calendar days from receipt of the Notice of Term ination,
the Contractor shall submit to the Head of Implementing Office a verified position
paper together with pertinent evidence stating why the contract should not be
terminated.
If the Contractor fails to show cause after the lapse of the seven (7) day period,
either by inaction or by default, the Head of Implementing Office shall immediately
issue an order terminating the contract.
E. Rescission of Notice to Terminate
The Head of the Implementing Office may withdraw the issued Notice to Terminate
to the contractor, at any time, before receipt of the latter's Verified Position Paper,
if it is determined that the grounds for the termination of contract is extinguished
as recommended by the Chief of Implementing Unit. A letter (Annex 3) should be
forwarded to the contractor informing the same that the Notice to Terminate
Contract has been rescinded.
F. Decision
1. Upon receipt of the contractors verified position paper or after the lapse of the
period prescribed in the Notice to Terminate, the Head of the 10 shall return
the records together with the verified position paper of the contractor, if any,
to the Chief of Implementing Unit with an instruction to submit within seven
(7) calendar days therefrom a Decision as proVided in Annex 4 hereof;
DEPARTMENT ORDER NO. qo ..
SERIES 2020
GUIDEUNES AND PROCEDURES IN TERMINATING CONTRACTS DUE TO THE FAULT
. Page 5 of 6
2. The Decision shall provide the Head of the Implementing Unit's

recommendation as to whether the DPWH shall terminate the contract due to
the fault of the contractor based on the evidences provided thereto;
3. The Head of the Implementing Unit shall also ensure that the supporting
documents required in item A hereof are attached in the Decision including the
following documents:
a. Notice to Terminate Contract duly received by the contractor or its

authorized representative and the proof of delivery if delivered thru a
courier; and
b. Verified Position Paper of the contractor and all its supporting documents,
if there's any;
4. Within a non-extendable period of three (3) calendar days from receipt of the
Decision, the Head of the Implementing Office shall decide to adc.y:>tthe
recommendation provided in the Decision and/or proceed with the termination
of contract.
V. NOTICE OF DECISION
Upon approval of the termination of the contract (Decision), the Implementing Unit shall
prepare the Notice of Decision to Terminate Contract (Annex 2-A) and attach the
approved Decision which shall be forwarded to the contractor and the said Notice shall
include an instruction to the contractor to ''appear before the Implementing Office within
seven (7) calendar days upon the receipt of the said notice, for the joint inventory of its
accomplishment, and that failure to do so shall constitute a waiver on their part for any
protest to the inventory conducted by the implementing office'~
A certified true copy of the proof of delivery in issuing the Notice to Terminate to the
contractor shall be attached in the Notice of Decision.
The Records Section/Project Engineer shall secure a proof of delivery from the courier
stating that the Notice of Decision was sent and duly received by the contractor in its
official business address as indicated in the contract agreement or shall execute proof
of service if forwarded to the contractor personally.
VI. CONTRACT TERMINATION REVIEW COMMITTEE (CTRC)
The Head of Implementing Office may create a committee to assist him in the discharge
of his functions under these guidelines. All decisions recommended by the CTRC shall
be subject to the approval of the Head of Implementing Office.
VII. BLACKLISTING OF THE CONTRACTOR
If warranted and immediately after the Notice of Decision to Terminate Contract has
been duly received by the contractor, the Head of Implementing Office shall facilitate
DEPARTMENT ORDER NO. 90 . , SERIES 2020
GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES IN TERMINATING CONTRACTS DUE TO THE FAULT
Page 6 of 6
the Suspension and/or Blacklisting of the erring contractor1• The Head of 10 shall
prepare a memorandum addressed to the Secretary (thru the concerned Undersecretary
for Regional Operations for Regional/DEO contracts) and attach pertinent supporting
documents together with its recommendation for the blacklisting of the contractor.
Pursuant to DO 192 Series of 2016, the concerned Undersecretary for Operations shall,
in turn, approve or disapprove the imposition of blacklisting by way of administrative
sanction on the contractor thru a memorandum addressed to the Secretary.
Subsequently, the Secretary shall confirm the approved blacklisting thru the issuance of
the corresponding Department Order.
The standard form for Notice to Terminate Contract, Notice of Decision to Terminate Contract,
and Notice of Decision Not to Terminate Contract is attached herewith as Annexes 1, 2-A and
2-B, respectively.
Failure of the concerned DPWH personnel to implement the provisions of this Order shall, after
due process, make them liable to the penalties prescribed for violation of reasonable office rules
and regulation in Rule 10, Adminisatrative Offenses and Penalties of the 2017 Rules on
Administrative Cases in the Civil Service dated 03 July 2017.
The Head of Implementing Office shall submit within thirty (30) calendar days upon the
effectivity of Contract Termination, a certified true copy of the approved Contract Termination
together with all supporting documents to the Bureau of Construction for the updating in
PCMA. Likewise, the official Inventory Report on the Physical Accomplishment of the
contractor should be attached.
This Order shall take effect immediately and amends pertinent provisions of D.O. 54 Series of
2011, D.O. 192 Series of 2016 and D.O. 193 Series of 2016. This Order shall also amend or
supersede any issuances to the contrary .
•..
~~---
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary
6.1.2. RMCjRAEfTCA/ECG/EAA
Department 01 Public Works and Highways

1111"" 1111111111111 ~III

11111111111
WINOW02169
1 D.O. 39 Series of 2015 consistent with GPPB Resolution No. 40-2017

Annex 1
IMPLEMENTING OFFICE
(Address)
(Date of Issuance) _
Mr./Ms. FULL NAME

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
SUBJECT : NOTICE TO TERMINATE CONTRACT
Dear Mr./Ms. (Last Name):
This refers to the contract (Name of Project) in the amount of ₱ (Contract Amount).
Pursuant to Section IV.2 Annex I of the 2016 Revised IRR of RA 9184, this notice is hereby
issued to terminate the contract (choose one - wholly or partly) for (state the ground/s for
termination e.g. Default, Convenience, Insolvency, Unlawful Acts) as stipulated under
Section III.A.2 Annex I of the 2016 Revised IRR of RA 9184 which was caused by (state the
circumstances which leads to the ground/s for termination e.g. Negative Slippage of 15% or
more, etc.). The existence of the aforementioned ground/s for termination was/were duly
verified by the Implementing Unit/Inspectorate Team as indicated in the notarized Verified
Report.
In view hereof, you are hereby ordered to submit, within seven (7) calendar days upon
receipt of this notice, a duly notarized position paper stating why the contract should not be
terminated. Likewise, substantiate your claim/reasons with acceptable supporting
documents.
Failure to submit a verified position paper within the prescribed period shall cause this Office
to issue the Order to Terminate the Contract pursuant to Section IV.3 Annex “I” of the 2016
Revised IRR of RA 9184.
Attached herewith is the notarized Verified Report as required under Section IV.2 Appendix I
of the 2016 Revised IRR of RA 9184.
For your information, guidance and compliance.
Very Truly Yours,
HEAD OF IMPLEMENTING OFFICE

Position
Office Code (e.g. RX.4.AAA/BBB)

(File Name)
Note: Use this Notice if the Head of IO approved the
Executive Summary (Contract Termination)
Annex 2-A
IMPLEMENTING OFFICE
(Address)
Mr./Ms. FULL NAME

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
SUBJECT : NOTICE OF DECISION TO TERMINATE CONTRACT
This refers to your contract (Name of Project) in the amount of ₱ (Contract Amount).
Pursuant to Section IV.5 Annex I of the 2016 Revised IRR of RA 9184, this Notice is hereby
issued to inform your firm that the contract has been TERMINATED (choose one - wholly
or partly), effective (upon receipt of this notice/or specify a date), for (state the ground/s for
termination e.g. Default, Convenience, Insolvency, Unlawful Acts), as stipulated under
Section III.A.2 Annex I of the 2016 Revised IRR of RA 9184 which was caused by (state the
circumstances which leads to the ground/s for termination e.g. Negative Slippage of 15% or
more, etc.), as indicated in the approved Contract Termination, as hereto attached.
In view hereof, you are hereby ordered to appear before this Office, within seven (7) days
upon receipt of this notice, for a joint inventory of your accomplishment. Failure to do so
shall constitute a waiver on your part for any protest on the inventory report prepared and
approved by this Office.
A corresponding Blacklisting Order will be issued in accordance with Appendix 17 of the

2016 Revised IRR of RA 9184 as amended by GPPB Resolution No. 40-2017 if warranted.
Compliance is hereby enjoined.
Very Truly Yours,

Position

(File Name)
Note: Use this Notice if the Head of IO disapproved
the Executive Summary (Contract Termination)
Annex 2-B
IMPLEMENTING OFFICE
Address
Mr./Ms. FULL NAME

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
SUBJECT : NOTICE OF DECISION NOT TO TERMINATE THE CONTRACT
issued to inform your firm that this Office decided Not to Terminate the Contract
(choose one – wholly or partly), (state reason for not terminating the contract), per
Executive Summary dated ______.
In view hereof, you are hereby ordered to continue with the implementation of the project
in accordance with the Contract.
Please be informed that based on the approved schedule, your firm has ____ ( ) calendar
days remaining to complete the project. Or (Please be informed that based on the approved
schedule, the contract duration has already expired, as such, this Office will apply the
liquidated damages.)
Very Truly Yours,

Position

(File Name)
Annex 3
IMPLEMENTING OFFICE
(Address)
Mr./Ms. FULL NAME

Position
Company/Firm
Complete Address
SUBJECT : NOTICE TO RESCIND THE ISSUED NOTICE TO TERMINATE THE

CONTRACT
issued to inform your firm that the Notice to Terminate Contract (choose one – wholly or
partly) is hereby rescinded since the (state the reason for rescinding the issued Notice to
Terminate the Contract – e.g. it is determined that the items or works subject of the notice
had been completed, delivered, or performed before the Contractor’s receipt of the Notice to
Terminate).
In view hereof, you are hereby ordered to continue with the implementation of the project
in accordance with the plans and specifications.
Please be informed that your firm has ____ ( ) calendar days remaining to complete the
project.
Very Truly Yours,

Position

(File Name)
Note: For DEO-implemented
infrastructure projects
Annex 4-A
IMPLEMENTING OFFICE
(Address)
(Date Prepared)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
(Proposed Termination of Contract for [State Grounds for Termination e.g. Default])
FOR : District Engineer (FULL NAME)

____ District Engineering Office
Office Address
SUBJECT : Proposed Contract Termination (choose one – Wholly or Partly)

for (State Grounds for Termination e.g. Default, Convenience,
Unlawful Acts, etc) for the Project: (Name of Project)
1. Action Recommended :
2. Implementing Unit :
3. Contractor :
4. Reason for this Proposed Contract Termination:
 State the circumstances which caused the proposed termination of the contract
wholly or partly
 State the action taken by the implementing unit e.g. issuance of Calibrated Action,
Site Instruction, Coordination Meetings, forwarding letter/correspondence to the
contractor
 State the action taken by the contractor, if there’s any, to address the existence of
ground/s for termination based on the issuances of the implementing unit/office, or
the inaction of the contractor on the Site Instructions/Notices issued to them
 State the findings and recommendation of the Implementing Unit/Inspectorate Team
based on the notarized Verified Report
5. Contractual Data :
Original Contract Amount :

Original Contract Duration:
Effectivity of Contract :
Original Expiry Date :
V.O. No. 1 : Revised Contract Amount and Duration (if there’s any)
Contract Time Extension : (Duration and Covering Period) if there’s any
Revised Expiry Date :
Copy the Subject Here and Align Right (Ctrl R)
Page _ of _
Physical Accomplishment : As of _______
Planned Accomplishment : __%

Actual Accomplishment : __%
Slippage : __%
6. Items of work subject of the Notice to Terminate Contract
(For partial termination of the contract, enumerate the items of work to be terminated)
6.1. Item XXX

6.2. Item YYY
6.3. Item ZZZ . . .
(For whole termination of the contract, indicate “All Items of Work”)
7. Remarks :
 Discuss the reasons/justifications of the contractor stated in the Verified Position

Paper
 State the confirmation/refutation of the IO on the reasons/justifications of the
contractor as stated in the Verified Report
 State the recommendation of the Implementing Unit based on all available
documents
 State the legal basis of the Implementing Unit for the action being recommended
and explicitly stating the existence of grounds to terminate the contract as
mentioned in the Verified Report of the Implementing Unit/ Inspectorate Team.
NAME OF THE CHIEF OF IMPLEMENTING UNIT

Position
APPROVED/DISAPPROVED:
NAME OF THE DISTRICT ENGINEER

Position
Office Code (e.g. R07.10.2/AAA/BBB/CCC)

(File Name)
Note: For RO-implemented
infrastructure projects
Annex 4-B
IMPLEMENTING OFFICE
(Address)
(Date Prepared)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FOR : Regional Director (FULL NAME)

Regional Office No. __
Office Address

3. Contractor :
wholly or partly
contractor

Page _ of _

Slippage : __%
6.1. Item XXX

6.2. Item YYY
6.3. Item ZZZ . . .
7. Remarks :

Paper
 State the recommendation of the Implementing Unit based on all available
documents
NAME OF THE CHIEF OF IMPLEMENTING UNIT

Position
NAME OF THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR

Position
Office Code (e.g. R07.2/AAA/BBB/CCC)

(File Name)
Note: For locally funded projects
implemented by the Central Office
Annex 4-C
IMPLEMENTING OFFICE
(Address)
(Date Prepared)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
FOR : Undersecretary AAA B. CCC

For UPMO Operations/Technical Services

3. Contractor :
wholly or partly
contractor

Page _ of _

Slippage : __%
6.1. Item XXX

6.2. Item YYY
6.3. Item ZZZ . . .
7. Remarks :

Paper
 State the recommendation of the Implementing Unit/Construction Supervision
Consultant (if there’s any) based on all available documents
NAME OF THE BUREAU/PROJECT DIRECTOR

Position

Position

(File Name)
Note: For CO/RO/DEO
Annex 5-A
IMPLEMENTING OFFICE
(Address)
(Date Prepared)
MEMORANDUM
FOR : HEAD OF IMPLEMENTING OFFICE

CO/RO/DEO
Office Address
SUBJECT : VERIFIED REPORT for the Proposed Contract Termination (choose

one – Wholly or Partly) for (State Grounds for Termination e.g.
Default, Convenience, Unlawful Acts, etc) for the Project:
(Name of Project)
Paragraph 1: Cite the instruction of the Head of IO to the Inspectorate Team to conduct the
Verification on the Existence of Grounds for Termination.
Example:
In compliance with the memorandum dated July 1, 2019 of the Regional

Director directing the Regional Inspectorate Team (RIT) to conduct
verification on the existence of grounds for termination as reported by the
Project Engineer in the memorandum dated June 28, 2019, the
undersigned conducted the site inspection on July 3, 2019.
Paragraph 2: Discuss the background of the project (e.g. contractor, approval of contract,
effectivity, duration, expiry, approved VO, approved WSO/WRO/CTE, revised expiry).
Paragraph 3: Discuss the grounds for termination as reported by the Project Engineer and
cite the official records/documents which support the allegation/s of the Project Engineer on
the existence of circumstances causing the grounds for termination
Example:
The Project Engineer, per report dated June 28, 2019, cited Section III.2.a
Section III.2.c.ii Annex I of the 2016 Revised IRR of RA 9184 as the
circumstances causing the existence of grounds for termination by default
which was due to the contractor incurring a negative slippage of 15.5% as
of June 27, 2019, and the non-provision of the minimum essential
equipment as listed on the Bid. The Project Engineer presented as
evidence the duly signed Statement of Work Accomplished as of June 27,
2019, Actual Monthly Equipment Utilization Report and the approved
Page _ of _
Equipment and Manpower Utilization Schedule, which was further

supported with the Project Logbook.
Paragraph 4: Discuss the actions taken by the implementing office or the Project Engineer
on the circumstances leading to the grounds for termination (e.g. Calibrated Actions, Site
Instructions, Letters, Coordination Meeting) and the response of the contractor, if any.
Example:
On the other hand, three (3) Site Instructions dated ___, ___, and ___,
were issued by the Project Engineer and duly received by the contractor
requesting the latter to provide the minimum essential equipment based
on the Equipment and Manpower Utilization Schedule. Likewise, the
Regional Director, per Calibrated Action for Early Warning Stage and ICU
Stage, dated ___, and ___, informed the contractor of its incurred
negative slippage, and requested for the submission of catch-up plan to
eliminate or address the said negative slippage. The contractor responded
to the letter of the Regional Director on ____ and ____ together with the
catch-up plan. However, despite the submitted catch-up plan, the negative
slippage was not eliminated.
Paragraph 5: Discuss point-by-point the observations of the inspectorate team whether the
circumstances causing the ground for termination is existing.
Example:
On the issue on the non-provision by the contractor of the minimum

essential equipment, it was observed by the inspectorate team during the
site inspection/validation, that only three (3) dump trucks were provided
instead of the minimum required six (6). Likewise, only 1 concrete mixer
was observed to be in good working condition instead of the required
three (3). Also, the required one (1) Concrete Paver was not provided by
the contractor. It was also observed in the Monthly Equipment and
Manpower Utilization Report that the minimum number of heavy
equipment as indicated in the Bid was not provided by the contractor.
On the other hand, as per computation made by the inspectorate team on

the actual accomplishment of the contractor, it was established and found
to be correct that the actual accomplishment of the contractor is only
30.50% vs the scheduled accomplishment of 46.00% as verified in the
approved Construction Schedule, thereby resulting to a negative slippage
of 15.5%.
Paragraph 6: Discuss the recommendation of the Inspectorate Team
Example:
In view of the foregoing observations and discussions, the inspectorate

finds and concludes that there is an existence of a Ground for Termination
by Default thru the fault of the contractor after it has incurred a negative
Page _ of _
slippage of 15.5% as of June 27, 2019 and the non-provision of the

minimum essential equipment as listed in the bid which is one of the
circumstances cited in Section III.2.a Section III.2.c.ii Annex I of the 2016
Revised IRR of RA 9184. As such, the inspectorate team hereby
recommends to the Regional Director, to issue to the contractor – AAA
Construction, the Notice to Terminate Contract, wholly.
Paragraph 7: Discuss the items of Work to be subjected to Termination
Example:
Hereunder are the Items of work subject of the Notice to Terminate Contract:
(For partial termination of the contract, enumerate the items of work to be

terminated)
1.1. Item XXX

1.2. Item YYY
1.3. Item ZZZ . . .
(For whole termination of the contract, indicate “All Items of Work under the
Contract will be subject of the Notice to Terminate the Contract”)
MEMBER 1 MEMBER 2 MEMBER 3

Position Position Position
MEMBER 4 MEMBER 5
Position Position
HEAD OF THE INSPECTORATE TEAM

Position
(S H O U L D BE N O T A R I Z E D)

(File Name)
Note 1: This is a sample format only. The Inspectorate Team should include details which
are not covered in this example.
Note 2: The signatories above is not the fixed number of members of an inspectorate team
Note 3: The sample being cited above is a project Implemented by the Regional Office
Note: For CO/RO/DEO
Annex 5-B
Republic of the Philippines )
_____________________ ) s.s.
JOINT VERIFICATION
We, __________________________, _______________________ and

___________________,
After being sworn to in accordance with law, depose and states that: We have caused the
preparation and issuance of a Verified Report for (Contract ID No. ____________) (Contract
Title) as stated in our memorandum to (concerned head of the implementing office) dated
_______________; That we have read and know that the contents thereof are true and
correct; The Verified report is not made to harass as the contents therein have evidentiary
support based on personal knowledge and/or authentic documents.
Member 1 Member 2 Member 3

Affiant Affiant Affiant
Member 4 Member 5
Affiant Affiant
Head of the Inspectorate Team

Affiant
SUBSCRIBED and sworn to before me, in the city/municipality of

__________________, this ___________ day of _________________, 20___________ by:
Name Valid ID No. Date and Place Issued

Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4
Member 5
Head of the Inspectorate Team
(Should be Notarized)
Note: For CO/RO/DEO
Annex 6
IMPLEMENTING OFFICE
(Address)
(Date Prepared)
MEMORANDUM
FOR : HEAD OF IMPLEMENTING OFFICE

CO/RO/DEO
Office Address
SUBJECT : PROJECT ENGINEER’S REPORT ON THE EXISTENCE OF A

GROUND/S FOR TERMINATION OF CONTRACT FOR
(Project Name)
Pursuant to Section IV.A of D.O. No. __ S. 2020 (DO on Termination), submitted herewith is
the Written Report on the existence of a Ground/s for Termination for the above-mentioned
project, under contract with ________.
Paragraph 2: Discuss the background of the project (e.g. contractor, approval of contract,
effectivity, duration, expiry, approved VO, approved WSO/WRO/CTE, revised expiry).
Paragraph 3: Discuss the existence of a ground/s for termination and cite the official
records/documents which support the allegation/s of the Project Engineer on the existence
of circumstances causing the grounds for termination.
Example 1: (Due to negative slippage of 15%)
With reference to the approved Construction Schedule, as of _____, the Contractor

has already incurred a negative slippage of 15.00%, which is a ground for
Termination by Default as provided in Section III.A.2.a Annex I of the 2016 Revised
IRR of RA 9184.
Example 2: (The contractor neglect or refuses to remove materials or to perform a

new work that has been rejected as defective or unsuitable)
With reference to the issued Site Instruction No. __, dated ___, the contractor was
instructed to remove the PCCP at Km. __ to Km. __, wich measures __ square
meters, due to the presence of Longitudinal Cracks on the newly paved PCCP. The
contractor was given __ days to remove all the defective PCCP. However, to date,
the said instruction was not complied by the contractor. And the said action of the
contractor is considered as a ground to terminate contract pursuant to Section
III.A.2.c.iv Annex I of the 2016 Revised IRR of RA 9184.
Page _ of _
Paragraph 4: Discuss the actions taken by the implementing office or the Project Engineer
on the circumstances leading to the grounds for termination (e.g. Calibrated Actions, Site
Instructions, Letters, Coordination Meeting) and the response of the contractor, if any.
Example: (Due to negative slippage of 15%)
On the other hand, three (3) Site Instructions dated ___, ___, and ___,
were issued by the Project Engineer and duly received by the contractor
requesting the latter to provide the minimum essential equipment based
on the Equipment and Manpower Utilization Schedule. Likewise, the
Regional Director, per Calibrated Action for Early Warning Stage and ICU
Stage, dated ___, and ___, informed the contractor of its incurred
negative slippage, and requested for the submission of catch-up plan to
eliminate or address the said negative slippage. The contractor responded
to the letter of the Regional Director on ____ and ____ together with the
catch-up plan. However, despite the submitted catch-up plan, the negative
slippage was not eliminated.
Paragraph 5: Discuss the recommendation of the Project Engineer
Example:
In view of the foregoing, the undersigned hereby recommends to the

Regional Director, to issue to the contractor – AAA Construction, the
Notice to Terminate Contract, wholly.
Paragraph 6: Discuss the items of Work to be subjected to Termination
Example:
Hereunder are the Items of work subject of the Notice to Terminate Contract:
(For partial termination of the contract, enumerate the items of work to be

terminated)
1.4. Item XXX

1.5. Item YYY
1.6. Item ZZZ . . .
(For whole termination of the contract, indicate “All Items of Work under the
Contract will be subject of the Notice to Terminate the Contract”)
NAME OF THE PROJECT ENGINEER

Position
Project Engineer Designation
Note 1: This is a sample format only. The Project
Engineer should include details which are not
Office Code (e.g. R07.2/AAA/BBB/CCC) covered in this example.
(File Name)
Note 2: The sample being cited above is a

project Implemented by the Regional Office
Annex 7
List of Documents to be Prepared by the Project Engineer (To be attached in the

PE’s Written Report) and for Review and Validation by the Inspectorate
Team/Implementing Unit (To be attached in the Verified Report)
1. The Calibrated Actions (Early Warning Stage and ICU Stage) pursuant to D.O. 193
Series of 2016. It shall be duly received by the concerned contractor or his authorized
representative. If delivered thru a courier, proof of delivery should be secured.
2. The duly signed Physical Accomplishment Report for each Calibrated Actions (Early
Warning and ICU Stage) indicating the negative slippages thereof.
3. Letter reply of the contractor on the issued Calibrated Actions, including the catch-up
plan, if there’s any.
4. Contract Agreement and the Notice to Proceed
5. Approved Variation Order, if any
6. Approved Work Suspension Order, Continuance of Work Suspension Order, Work

Resumption Order, Contract Time Extension, if any
7. Original PERT/CPM/PDM and revised (if any) together with the Monthly Equipment and
Manpower Utilization Schedule
8. All approved Monthly Status Reports
9. Contractual Data/Project Profile
10. Physical Accomplishment Report duly signed by the Project Engineer (as of the date
when the Project Engineer prepared the Written Report pursuant to Section IV.A
hereof)
11. Pictures (Geotagged)
12. Other relevant documents deemed necessary to further support the report of the
Project Engineer / Verified Report of the Inspectorate Team/Implementing Unit
regarding the existence of the grounds for termination:
a. For Default due to Negative Slippage of 15% while the Project is On-going
 Actual Monthly Equipment and Manpower Utilization Report

 Relevant Site Instructions of the Project Engineer and duly received by the
contractor/authorized representative (Instructing to provide the necessary
resources at the project site, etc.)
 Relevant Letter of the Implementing Office duly received by the Contractor
(Requesting for meeting to discuss the slow progress/ Instructing to provide
the necessary resources at the project site, etc.)
 Letter reply of the Contractor to the issued Site Instruction/s and/or Letter of
the IO, if there’s any
 Certified copy of relevant pages in the Project Logbook (showing the available
equipment and manpower at the project site)
b. Due to the Contractor’s Fault and after the contract time expired, it incurred a
negative slippage of ten percent (10%) or more in the completion of the work
 Physical Accomplishment Report after the contractor incurred a negative

slippage of 10% or more (After the expiry of the project and the contractor
incurred a negative slippage of 10%)
c. Contractor abandons the contract works, refuses or fails to comply with a valid
instruction of the Procuring Entity or fails to proceed expeditiously and without
delay despite a Written Notice by the Procuring Entity
 Copy of the Written Notice of the IO duly received by the Contractor to

proceed works at the site expeditiously
 Certified copy of relevant pages in the Project Logbook (Reporting that the
contractor abandons the contract works/fails to show at the project site,
refuses or fails to comply a valid instruction)
d. Contractor does not actually have on the project site the minimum essential
equipment listed on the Bid necessary to prosecute the Works in accordance with
the approve work plan and equipment deployment schedule as required for the
project
 Project Engineer’s Report on the Mobilization of the Minimum Essential

Equipment (Supporting document during the request of the contractor for the
Advance Payment)
 Actual Monthly Equipment and Manpower Utilization Report
contractor/authorized representative (Instructing to provide the necessary
resources at the project site, etc.)
 Relevant Letter/s of the Implementing Office duly received by the Contractor
(Instructing to provide the necessary resources at the project site, etc.)
 Certified copy of relevant pages in the Project Logbook (which indicates the
number of equipment available at the project site)
e. Contractor does not execute the Works in accordance with the contract or
persistently or flagrantly neglects to carry out its obligations in the contract
contractor/authorized representative (Notifying the contractor that the works
performed is not in accordance with the contract, or its failure to carry out its
obligations in the contract, etc.)
(Notifying the contractor that the works performed is not in accordance with
the contract, or its failure to carry out its obligations in the contract, etc.)
 Certified copy of relevant pages in the Project Logbook (reporting the
incident)
f. Contractor neglects or refuses to remove materials or to perform a new work that

has been rejected as defective or unsuitable
contractor/authorized representative (Instructing to remove materials or
perform works that has been rejected as defective or unsuitable, etc.)
(Requesting to remove materials/perform new work that has been rejected as
defective or unsuitable, etc.)
 Certified copy of relevant pages in the Project Logbook (reporting the
incident)
g. Contractor sub-lets any part of the contract works without the approval by the
Procuring Entity
 Geotagged Pictures of the personnel and equipment at the project site which
are not connected to the contractor and no prior approval was issued by the
IO
 Copy of the official list of contractor’s manpower for the project
 Copy of the Organizational Chart of the Contractor
 Copy of the list of equipment submitted by the contractor in its bid
13. Additional Supporting Documents to be attached/prepared by the Inspectorate Team/

Implementing Unit in Submitting the Verified Report
 Project Engineer’s Report (Written Report)

 Verified Report
 Geotagged Pictures during the conduct of site inspection/validation of the
Inspectorate Team/ Implementing Unit
CJCi '7. I ~ D r"c.) {.f
Republic of the Philippines (0. f1, .:vJ.:ijJ
CENTRAL OFFICE
Manila
OCT 1 4 2020
DEPARTMENT ORDER ) SUBJECT: New and Updated Standard ~Plans
) for Various Flood Control, Urban
Drainage and Coastal Structures
~o?u j
(CY 2015-2019)
:>:ieS of ~"I),
In line with the issuance of Department Order No. 179 series of 2015, re: DPWH Design
Guidelines, Criteria and Standards (DGCS), 2015 Edition, new and updated standard plans for
the design of various flood control, urban drainage and coastal structures are now available
for reference.
The issuance of these standard plans aims to ensure the safety, cost effectiveness and
development of high quality detailed design for water engineering projects incorporating the
industry's best practice in design adaptable to local requirements. The said plans shall serve
as guide for District Engineering Offices, Regional Offices, Project Management Office Clusters
and Engineering Consultants in the preparation of water engineering plans based on the
revised design guidelines.
The new and updated standard plans for water engineering projects are as follows:
I. NEW
1. Seawall (4 sheets)
a. Seawall with Boulders Toe Protection
b. Seawall with Sheet Piles
c. Seawall using Geotubes
2. Hexapod Spurdike (1 sheet)
3. Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Sheet Pile (1 sheet)
4. Two (2) meter Reinforced Concrete Pipe Culvert (RCPC) (2 sheets)
5. Combination of Bored/Steel Sheet Pile for Bank protection (3 sheets)
6. Rubble Mound Breakwater (2 sheets)
7. Rubble Mound Jetty with Geotube Core (3 sheets)
II. UPDATED
1. Slope Protection Works (3 sheets)
a. Details of Different Types of Revetment
b. Details of Curtain Walls and Berm
c. Details of Foot Protection Works of Revetment
2. Details of Gates (2 sheets)
a. Flap Gate
b. Slide Gate
3. Pile hurdles (2 sheets)
4. Bio-Engineering for Slope Protection Application (3 sheets)
5. Reinforced Concrete Sheet Pile (1 sheet)
D.O. No. l00. Series of 2020
New and Updated Standard Plans for Various Flood Control, Urban Drainage and Coastal Structures
Page 2 of 2
6. Steel Sheet Pile (U-Type & Z-Type) (1 sheet)

7. EarthdikejLevee (2 sheets)
8. Drainage Culvert with Flap Gate (3 sheets)
9. 2m to 6m Gravity Waif (5 sheets)
The aforementioned plans can be downloaded from the DPWH Intranet (http:dpwhnet) under
Bureau of Design - Standard Design.
-
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary
5.1.2 LLLjECM/AMD

1111111111111111111111111111111111111
WINOR01536
., .. .'·'
,- , ;.
}
.. ,.,"'" :,'
,
Republic bfthe philippines
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND IDGHW AYS
BUREAU OF DESIGN,W ATER PROJECTS DMSION
Bonifacio Drive, Port Area, Manila
STANDARD PLANS OF SEAWALL
8. SEAWALL WITH BOULDERS TOE PROTECTION

b. SEAWALL WITH SHEET PILES
c. SEAWALL WITH ,GEOTUBE
APPROVED BY: , I,
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
SUBMITTED BY:
[)epIlItIT'ent of PubUc WorkJ .,cI H'Onw.v-

QtIk:oof'''''''''''''''
IIMlIlllIllllllmnnN
WIN6R01228 •
\
\
\
GENERAl NOTES:
1. ALLDMII'IlON8.IiLIM\T1ONB AND DlSTANCE8AM" ••.•.••••• 1JM,.E8S dtHeRWIeI. SEafS). 12. T&NIU lJ'I"N!NBntOfnE tfVtlRMa.ICaectrmm.I ~ Nfl}II!!ROIIOIfCONTROl AND
2.IIEiFIMNCEDA1\IIlIIJUIU.BEM8I!CClN tIE MEAN LClIW8RLOWWA18' (MU.W.)

8AIAlT~GI01EX1U......u..PRCPERlY~.
13.ARIQItfUJ( (CLM$I)PECI :
,
ILEYAlION •• tD.On.
•• CLA8l1 ROCKaMUlTWBBHNOT lEII81'HN\l1,900"" Pl!RQBCUETiR SOlO
l..N.l. ~ WDmIIE aw..t.1E aASa ""'0 (124MDl)FtlRft.C. WAVEOEFt..ECf'OR/lfO SLAI (lPEGACCllMYllY ·UJORNlPROXNAlELY , ••ll5fC1l,.ONEW1"Cll
(ktI)PBt.CUlUC
ON FLL WlUCWAv. OF8QLlOIMTEIllW.S.
b. CLAlt1ROCK....,.8EANO\lNl
•• AU. AI!!N'tlftCIHQ S1&I. BARSaw.L BE OEFOMII!D INt$ 'M1H DEflOMlA1'ICIM CONI'CIAaING TO c. PlECU OF ClMS 1 AOOlSIHNJ..WEIGH NCrt' lESSl"tlAN 1 TONtt_ ".)
A8TM MiS ,t,fCIoOF INnlRMIDIo\'II! tGIWII <to) WITH ••••••• "f'IILD a1RENG1H •••• m ••• {4lI.ClOOpII)
U.FLTO.CLOTH
5. MIN'ClAClNG 1MI1tWL. CCIIJ) lENt . •• POL..-rER OR POf..~ -- -
b. MIQtMICMJ.Yt-EATIONCID
I. ~8AA88tlALLHI\W""'" COVEAIG ~nER.c. WlIWE DlJl\..lCKlANlJILAION Co NClfIoWOJIIIacor.l'Fl8l!MCONlMIOU8FlLAIefT
JlJ..WI4X!N4.Y • It 1!fIII!l;'IIIIE0PINIfrtCJ8lZE --- ttOMICMHS(Ua)
•• '1tfItlIlNI8Suta!R~ --_ ••••• ,
fo weGtff .",.
7.~01NCH011lBoW ItW.1BE'lM!LDEDATLEMTlHREENCAtV'U1IIIEB(l i> •.lIIJl.lIJIRECl1CNM..~meKmt--"'-
THE DlMElERCR8IZE Cf'_1lUT NOTLlUTlWI,.., ALL~ G'RENC:lRCltG
INtlNo\VIII Et.EClI!ICMl.V~1IW1llEOINLEUOF1YIG1I&t'MTtlGJ--'" tL CD PlafC:TlN tmetGlH
LALLlMEL.IJIlQatM1.i.IIJTTWEl..MUETWEl.OUM.ESIortfERWl.~. WELDING 15.U9GTHOFIttEET PUlItWJ. CON8I8tTHE~TEOtEP1MtWlCOtRNO.

ELEClRODE&~~nPEHEAVLYOOl\TED'Wmta.Al8lt=ICA'nClN
No. N01OOF".~V&DIItGI8ClI21Y .
•• •••.••• IHMJ.GCMNll CMltICH.EOIllMENIItlM •• CASE; 01~·
.••• n-. •••••• IN.c:ttARGI uusr •••••• SUlMTTALOF AGQREGA'TUMI):CfJNCII!TI:8M1'!.E8

AI ~8YCUflRENTRl!CU.A11ON8.
1'. 1MI DIEe'IOR OfF ItJIENJ or DEMGIN 8W.L EINFONED ACCORDIfGlYFTIEfE ARE
ELlVA11OHSC1# PIlIaPOIIDBEA'M\U. WHICH'MIUlD ~
-"' ..•...•.
~ QWIIf8.
.",)
1219
.".
'"'"'
""
..
'"'"'"
V".
NOIE:
o ~ICAL SECTION OF SEAW~~ O~RT ELEVATION
- ~"' __
OIIaeIt1ft~l!IIc!etlly
II1dH _
COI'RJJRA'Q(NT'yIIf (IF ILOP£ P'RID1ECTrJNWCIRICSILENG1H OF

111111111111111111
- -- --
TC£ PRatECfIOII SWJ.IE BMED<IIITA8l.JfY IlIW.Y8IIISCOJR
••••. 'ISII,/OE~y. WIN6R01228
DEPARlM~~J:!:E::ANDHIGHWAYS
•... •.. ••.•••. IllIZI' •••
-- - -..
BUREAU OF DESIGN - TYPICAL SECTION TYPICAL STD. DMWING Of
• WATER PROJECTS OMSION - P-'RT a£VATION SEA WALl WI SHEET PILE ••••••
fOP 01 SEAwALl
1GD••••.• PH.
NOIE:
-....-.-,:
<Ut1GUtAtlDNTYPE
TOE FRat£CIICH
C6BUJIE PN:nECTION'tI!OU 'lBGIH ~
8HAL1: tIE BASED ~ ST1&I1'Y IfUlYIIS IsctUt o ~ICAL SECnON OF SEAWALL o ;;.cnON DBTAILOF WAVE DEFLECT~
' 1U" .-
RClDMSMDWN
,
§
RC PRECAST
-ffmj·-
Iil
~ ::.:.
- --- --
~
-~ -~- ---
-- --- ---
I SLA810.1Slm.I1*.W/12lrm
•• o.3lXIrtJ.O.c..101lfWAYS
SlAB COVER DETAlLPlAN '
o SECTION DETAIL
DETAILOF DRAINAGE-DITCH
IllU _
,0
o DETAILOF
_ END
1111 PROTECnON
_
~AIL OF ANCHORAGE TO ARMOUR RO~
_"Publlc~ond
OIIl!oaftlto_"
1111111••• 11111111'
Hll"-
llE'U."COflHl.tIlI'I'lNES ••.. -- •••• 1IlLD

---- •.. --
WIN6R01228
_Ill.
-
DEPARTMENT Of PUBUC WORl<S AND HIGHWAYS
• SEC'I1C* DErAIl. OP WAVE DeA..ECTOR
BUREAU OF DESIGN 1YP1C"'-. sm. DRAWING OF SEA WAlL
-
• DETAIL Of DIWNAGI! DlTOt
• WATERPRO.EC1S DMSlON • T't'IlICAL S!CTIDN WI BOUlDER TOE PROTECTION
• DET~ OF ANCHORAGE! TO ARMOUR ROCK
')
•...
.....
~
.". '"
,C)"
~ \e) 121'
•...
....
-~-
""
•...
.....
VAA.
12rnm g
121'
•...
..."
•••
---
I I I 1I l' I I I II
I
I
I I I I I I ...,..."' .
I I I I I I I I I
! I I ! ! ! ! i !
NOTE:
o TYPICAL SECTION OF SEAWALL
•• III _ .-
ELEVATION
"""""""'" 01 PublcWcrka •• d H~~
OlIIaoollllo_1y
CCHlQURAnotn'tPl!
TOE~8W.L.
OFaCFEPNnEC11ONWCRCI&LEN8THCE
8MBJ lJtST8.ITY MM.'t'IISISXlJR
11111111111.1111111
__ BPliClM5LY. W1N6R01228
DePART_7P1J~·=~HIGHWAYS
BUREAU OF DESIGN
IltIlT __
- TYPICAL SECTION
--
lYPlCAL STD. DRAWING Of'
seA WAlL WI SHEEr PILE
-- _ •. tHIIt •••
-- --
WATER PRO.ECTS DMSION
- PART ELEVATION AND HYDRAUUC GEOTEXT1LE
lUBE F1UER
" ,
...
1._1MIt •.• "t.'

eu..o.c..ICJIIfM1W6
RCI'IlECAII' •••• CXN!R
_8 X,.• NiICltOR ••••••••••••. a;pntlFa8lII

8WB ••• o.c.lOEtlIILIADl'OHlWIMlID"
aJMC.IPCll't'(IOEEDBI(JIlIIMf""
MU.W.lO;OOm.
- o .... -
o ...
DETAIL OF ANCHORAGE TO ARMOliJR ROCK
.••....
TYPICAl SECTION OF SEAWALL
-
-
•...•.. -~ § --- -- .- ------
-·-18"" RC PRECAST§
•• i,~ •
SlAB COVER DETAil PlAN ~
..•••.••••• _o.c..
4-_'UI«iIII\IlIMLillW
o-- SECTION DETAIL
DETAIL OF DRAINAGE DITCH

.-
o...SECTION DETAIL OF WAVE DEFLECTOR
- N011:
(1QNF_1YI'ErJF ••••• PROIECl1IlII_.~lIIrJF
10E I'IlO1ICl1oNSIWl.IE.....,OIllll'MInY
-~Y.
_VIIl''''''' -o:::~v;:.::~
1111111111111111111
. 'vVIN6R01228
Kl' III. __ •••
•••••••••
TYPICAl STO. DRAWING OF SEA WAlL
--
_III
WI BOULDER TOE PROTECTION ~

AND HYIlRAUlJC GeOTEXTILE lUB!
FILlER
-
n&1 ~
I ~
~.
~I
_I
~~~-Ii•• ~ I
I ~
1n1~ ,.,- f1lIID I II ,/
~
;
I
_J!!.-I
I A
T
T \
.- 1 !
11
1 • I iJ
~l
I ®=
--'--
VIEw (SPECIAl. "":'l
_-l~ 1--'-- I
- -11
~I I I ~I I I I ~ I 1; I
- ~
-. '1m It ,,..
- ..•..
---- i
!-~I I I ;\1 T I I
~
I
-
~ I
- 1
- - (~YSOMEmIC
1 mu
VIEW (SPECIAl. TYPE)
'1.
~,. CD GENERAL LAYOUT PLAN OF HEXAPOD
REJNFORCEIIOO IINl OF HElW'OD UNIT PIECE (NORIIH. TYPE) REIHFORCEIolENfIINl OF HEXN'OO UNIT PIECE (SPEaN. TYPE)
I - ~ I llI'£ u:" ,.0._:~~IMll1rA.:- llI'£ ~ IlO. -: -~IIMl---:-"

..,.. ....
....
- •••
...
DIG .II,
II
••• ,101 12 IS
••• • •• •• J/(/ JIll

•• ...•
III
~~l
t.111
•••
TOtAL • 1068
• ••• ••• J/(/
10K. - 11.
GENERAL N01£S:
') _, SPIll __ 'lI" SHI1U.
IE 1GOol1O5JI!lol.
•• I® DET~LEl 2)- _aer_SIIIIWlIEIIPlUIIlHllllS 2 PCS.
I : I
~ 1:10 tE\IIl1IItE_CII_PUJ.
3l_---OM--
.)':L-:'":":,: ~..=.~\::
lIIl_IE_Il __ SUCJll6aer.EJC.
~ CD HOOK DETAIL
5lCXllll:llllEClASS'lI':
CiQl!i:llElESHI1U.IEClASS'1I"
••• IIIlSllM' IF 111-1_
SIlEtE
5) __ tE 11£ SPIIlIllC[ SHI1U.

IE PBIPEIIlIlWR1ll11£ __
CD ~TVI~ •• 1)11£_tEHIlGIPODSHI1U.IE_PUIl
.) IIllIlI!lI.IIEIlSIIY
IF HIlGIPOD
IS &., ""_ OM
•• 1'll'£.
llI'£ lIlY.
CD HEXAPOD SPUR DIKE DETAILS

® l"\
--.....
DETAIL C
w:M.E 1:1G
®~AIl;~
I REPUWC OF THEPHlUPf'lNES IIGI' COIC11ICI'II

••••.
1- ••• i ••••••• ., Y -- lEI' IlL •••.••

IfVk-' . ~
BUREAU OF DESIGN : ::=r~~RDI" DETAILS T'lPICAL STANDARD DRAWING lre;..,- (\ ~ ~
• WATER PROJECTS DMSION - REINFORCEMENT DETAIL OF HEXAPOD SPURDIKE ~ .N'V1I tHEF,WA1!IlPAD.B:rlIlt{.,8.0a T ",B.OJ).
"
. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
BUREAU OF DESIGN, WATER PROJECTS DIVISION
BONIFACIO DRIVE, PORT AREA, MANILA
STANDARD POLYVINYL
CHLORIDE (PVC) SHEET PILE
FOR REVETMENTS
,"
i
i
(-:Ii
i
I I
--29L_ II I, U-TYPE
II <---
I
10 mm ~ BARS SPACED AT 300mm

BOTHWA YS
12 mm ~ STIRRUPS TO PASS THRU
HANOUNG HOlES OF PILES
(ONE SnRRUP PER PILE)
12 mm ~ LONGITUDINAL BARS
SPAC£O AS SHOWN
PVC SHEET PILE
I
8
'" , Z- TYPE
GENERAL NOTES:
..
1, USE OF POLYVINYL CHlO~tOE (PVC) SHEET PilES SHALL 8: BA6EO ON AN eST/f'..1ATEO COST COMPARISON VVlTH OTHER TYPES OF "
"
SHEET PILES. E,O. CONCRETE AND STEEL. FOR POTENTIAL COST SAVINGS AND SHALL MEET Al..L THe PERFORMANce
REOUIREMENTS FOR THE speCIFIC APPI.ICATION, INCl.UDING STRENGTH. STIFFNess, INSTALLATION, tNTeFtl.OCK INTEGRITY, , .' .. ~. ,; :
DURABILITY AND LONGEVITY. SUCH PILE SHALL NOT tsE USED WHEN LARGE IMPACTS DURING THE DESIGN liFE ARE POSSIBLE, I.E
LAROE OEeRIS AND veSsEL
8
It)
.-
~ ~ ••• ~
..... : ..
2. THE pvc SHEET PilES AND OTHER APPURTENANT
PRESCRIBEO 1N DEPARtMENT
MATEHlALS SHAll CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS
ORDER <.44, SERIES OF 2016 RE; DPWH STANDARD SPECIFICATION
AND speCIFICATIONS
FOR ITEM S23· POLYVINYL
____
L __
:.~~~ ",:~ ,
-_
,~:~~:._.:, -, .. .•.~.__ .~"'--
'' _ ~ .J,. __
"
" "_".~:"~"' -. -:-"'OWI.
-er _..- ...-
CHLORIDE (PVC) SHEET PILES
THE' LENGTH AND SECTION MOOVU;S OF THE pvc SHEET PiLE SH/&.LL BE BAseo ON THE RESULTS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL
INVESTIGATION AND STA81L1rt' ANAL •••.SIS .
•. HiE FREE HE.IGHT OF THE PVC SHE:ET PILE SHALL NOT EXCEED TVIiO (2) METERS TO LIMIT POTENTIAL DEFLECTION
~ THE CONTRACTOR SHALl. FURNISH AND DRIVE TeST PILES OF THE REQUIRED DIMENSIONS AT THE LOCATIONS DE.S1GNATED BY THE
E;NGINEER, FOR EACH SHIPMENT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT MiLL CERtiFICATes PROVIDED BY Tl-{E PVC SHEET PILE
MANUFACTURER PRIOR TO INSTALLING
6 AlL PVC SHEET PILES SHALL BE DRIVEN AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR AS D!RECTED 9y' THE ENC.:NEER. E'XCAVATIONS FOR THE
FOUNDATION ON WHICH THE PVC SHEE.T PILES ARE TO BE DRIVEN SHALL BE COMPLETED BEFORE THE PILE ORlvING. UNLESS
OTHERV'IISE SPECIFIEO OR APPROVED BY THE ENGINeER,
7. SPLICING OF' PVC SHEET F'ILES SHALL NOT 13E ALLOWED
iJRtP,l.qEiJB' OArt
llU,(I" ••••
'\II~:w •.
STANDARD POLYVINVL GeNERAL NOTES, Ph.E CAP DETAIl ' GfI'&!lol.,::"..J, ~1";"!U
CHLORiDE IP'IC) SHEET PilE AND ElEVAT10N -~-- .••.••'=-~~,;:,UOto"-~-
FOR REVETMENTS
/'

STANDARD TWO (2) METER

REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
CULVERT
0.
•...
.~'~"-;=f--~ 32~m
I il
I
~' I' ,
~' -- --
" '< -i I
I
9
f I
•...
.1 I ;
ONE LINE OF CIRCULAR TWO LINES OF CIRCULAR ONE LINE OF ELLIPTICAL

REINFORCEMENT REINFORCEMENT REINFORCEMENT TONGUE END GROOVE END
6-SECTION ~SECTION e-SECTION e-SECTION
(i.O.' C!=" P~PE SHAL~ VARY ~CT ·.lCfi£ Ji.'\~ + ~:tCH

t.T!':::t.AL )JAIJ(T~~ THt: S~""~N::; (CEhH:'! r:: cr ••. TER) rOR 6Jt':'IM OP LESS. WAi..L
CY At~"C'E~T RINeS 01: 'HCK'€SS PfiOiECrlVt: Cal/£R:~G
, 50r-1'l' l't'i'C"~V£~IS GF2A"tP: .~Cv 7}-C a£~IC1\ CI""::TER
2 ••••.
'.1 T:-iI::;(r.;[SS - H~ WAi..~ T"'Co(~ESS Sl-.~~ "'CT2E 1'A' -.,,,,T SI"CW'~ .rss C,"1CJ',I:EflE"ll~~ =!!;N::'O'iC~IJ::NT ;\ 5h~~_ SE 'e~m
" T"'t J~S!(.), 9Y tiGRE j}..A~ ~:; O~ .l..80r-l ••• \I\':;o-E.V::~ IS GR( .•••.
iSR. A CACE SHALL ~CT £XCi:EO iC~~:"I. •.. rCR fJml'l'l OR c~~rER. WALi,.
•.Et.CT>i 0: iWC CP;:OSlT£ $11(; - 'I.4.~·~TO'" t. lil.Y'.l'lC ~tNCTH5 ·""0 or ,0;;: S~0r'I'\" OR ~O~E. ViA.l.i. ~"'lCj(NESSCIR'::J:.A~~~I~rCR:~MEM
S;'A,~ BF.: ~LACEC J5~ TO 5CX ~r
G~Qosn: S:J~S Of p'p:. St-AL:.!,or [x::~W 'Y l!l~", ., A.\V~S'jGN or P:;>~ rlfCK'NE.SS. TM€: e~.l. OR T..•~ S~jGor
( •.~hCT-l c~ o~E - L"JERRl/'~ f.,~
N !!"lC1- c; A 5ECT;OI\ CF ":P( 51-Al'.. ~CT C' ;)o( Xl",r Sf<.I,L~ ':o.'HAI~ AT w~:. ~•.C(~f.SS ~~t,I f."\E I~M"
i.[AST O"l[ ORCU\.ln;1:"f7'i.A.L S,--'RI'I\C(
3: lJGR£ ~rA~ !Q(C"'m/rr. '111"1 A lJAX",Jl,l :;r l5tr.M N AN" L£~GTl-tr-r j'lfl(
~£N~ORct\lPI~,
REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE CULVERT DETAilS

SCALE AS SHOV\1II
(1' ••. ::Ie •. 1s.. .•. ~O'l ••',,~'S" ?8C •.••,.. , C' • ()€=>ri-o C. n~l
.-
<,t' • IIC •. 7~,,1'I' 101'1 ""!:5 :. 76(:' ••", • ~ .• O.rs:C( O•••. I>,j,Ert;l'l::>f "1'It;
IJIN.O,~ INSIDE DIAMETER
EARTH
MtN·O.2~bc
I '-4tN-O. lObe
" .. ~~LE~.';OI,l;>"'C~!C
EMTH OR ROCK
~ ~ 'l,tiW.I("'£,~T I::
t. ,
s·,. , - CO"'STIllJC' CC•••p~~::)
(~~"KV::'Ii~ 10 .4'1i (,,£V.4"\O!\
~r::" 2 - '~E~C'" T!iI'lOUCI-' tt-t ''''''PACTE:'
Elle.,·jl'.IolE ••.•. "'lie tt.STiol.;. I"~' 8.lC":"."
'5'~::r J • ~O"'P~CTt tV3A.•••{lol!JIj-
t;\JSI.,f,lA'j';l;'lIl
.113,;\( fCP OF "~~i:'C~!O p,",;: hi"'" t;oull"=~E:) al'l""'uiJo" •••"It.ll''''~
METHOD A
c;:.::;;c --I
-.
Y
1,I,l~!"""_ , CONCRETE OR SETTER ',CRANULAR BACKFILL
1
t
fi
..f,
,
LD. ',\K;~N~ ""'IIC C
CONCRETE CRADLE BEDDING ORDINARY BEDDING ~'AOF.
s·n' . - ~C"t'T~'-ICT
(l,I3 ••••••
lo ••SI(t ro
C~I,l!l.4::;~'::)
.10fC~ .••" ~:. ••.•
!!:r;p, _ filE!\C-I1'>-=l'X.lC'"
[tie" 'Ii.c:V«f!'
'1-r ·':::C.,.PIoCT)
:: 1"~TIo.l.L P~Ii'': iL'C,Co'_l
A••••
s~r? J - fl;'~ ~r.l.IA'N:>C:R 0; T"~"C~
W!I-f G-/>Cl<rL•• P••••CE:l I'; LCOt(S~ ." •• "'"
'" ""
E~.; .••1. ·0 tw,C~ r ••i CV·S D( 0:,0.. CC"'''A:-D
>II11'i-o "'v.
CI< •••••••• 1J tI •••'It~,\~, :O':l!.~,8~! C'=''')IT,:)t.
122"
'"
12:- '"
'so
or ·Io~"::l(
METHOD B
"'"
o NOT
METHODS OF INSTALLATION
TO seA" 8- TYPICAl BEDDING FOR CONDUITS
NOT TO SCAlE
o COLLARING DETAILS
D ••• re
STANDARD rND i2} METER

REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
CULVERT
STANDARD STRENGTH REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE CULVERT (CLASS II)
SfZ~ 0,
?IPE: CONCRETE 281 kg/em' (4,000 Iblin')
(ow)
v
'NA'-L
T "'~C 0{ -
"';:S$
TQJ'.<Cl.i£
(mM)
;,~0::;V;;:
, ••.•,;'1".)
C£Fi""
(!""1m)
f.O"':'of ••••M RDNFO~CEI.1';:~jT
cm2 12"... or
PiP:;:
v~~•.CA.:.. RZI!\PO~CE"t~\T
"I""~~~j ~~;i~6?R;!~~~N~ v::~nCA~R:; I\PORCEI.lENT VIN'\o!LJM ~e:'~rORCE"'ENT
c-r2/21'"'1 0' ~:PE
VERTICAL REI~~OqC::I.JEl\T
':"F€:tIC~1-- -EST
"'-<;/rr
;:(::OI..;,~EM::'jTS
:~~)
,
WAu.
• I"I•..•!. S
:::;RCul.A~ EI..UpnCA.
(jA,-,- C
r.;~~~::OCE 8::..c..,'NG M=:-"'OD
LD. • B C P
(:IRCJ'.AR
..
El'_ P':"ICAL
iN"-jER
~::;'<F'CRCS'-1E!\ • ~E::NF'O~CEV::~f~'
,f" , l~'
CAve OJT::R Cr'\C~ C·RCoJR
RE:i~~O~C~V::~
".
i ~E:;"'FCRCEJ,(r:N-
E\,.~,:::TjCAl.
l!\il'.;;>:! CAGE: O'J:::~ CACE: :'.IE:-.iFORC£~~NT
J";':
~EINF"O.::!CEVEl\l
INN;::~ ~A:::;;: Ou·~R CACl:
'",:,,"."'..0' ~~"II",r( LOo4
'ice 0.90 10.20 '003 1an 'OlC 1029 0.64 b '.€ 64 oS-8'Tme 6-J:rr.r:"" 5.0 3.0 5.€ e-5rTr""l1t f:i-6rrl"'1$ 3.0 3.G H 5-5M"'" 6-81'T'r"l~ 4'S87 E~I3'
·050 i .05 1i.40 i 16d i la? 1 :75 1,:34- 0.6J. •. € ~ 7.6 6-SI'T'",",ta 6-e .....
lr""'~ E.' J.B 7.2 6-BrrM;ll 6-a.,.,~, L.2 3.0 '€ 5-8M""~ 6-3rrt""'l" f>J52 ~O2.,9
'200 \ 20 12.70 . 3J4 1J53 1340 1.359 0.64 9 ~/4 9.3 6-8rr""'«1 d-el""'!""'" 7.6 '.5 !3_t. 0-8rV',..,t 6-?\TMi 15.0 j.6 t.4 5-Sm-r¢ 6-Brr"'1\ll 6 ~ 16 9174
1 •.•.·) 6-8l"'1'T'f S-8rrM' 7645 1'460

~500 loSe 15.20 ;664 1~63 1670 1690 O.E4 '2.8 7.6 "4 6-9'l"lTd'~ 6 -8M~0 10,6 (/.4 '1.8 6-91T~/7, €-S-rmll 9.4 5.6
STANDARD STRENGTH REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE CULVERT (CLASS IV)

S ZE cr:
pr~£ CONCRETE 281 kg/em' (4,000 Ibtln')
(fl"I""I)
W~~
••••0<- -:'O\iGUr:
(,..,.,.)
CPCovE J~O·'"
YI\i:~UA
e.,..'
RE:••.•
FORCE~E"'·
/, ••...0' l':PE"
YE'R~'JCA •.• REi'IF"CRC::'VEl\f
MiM;;~1~;N~~~;~~g~T Vi;:RPCAL Rt::"-iC"ORcE •.•.•£~r ~,.'-j:M:JV PEI~i='OR::£M::\i:
cr12/2,..... ~i:Ii::
0'
Vt:RT'CA'_ ~:::!NF"CRCEI.l;;N.,.
T~:;;~cr"" T~S'
kq/~·
R(Q;J·RE~£ .•••TS
" M,SS
(.,..""j
(~n: \'T"""'l}
WA.:" A WALL e -,y~i.l C
7"ld~CE CDGE: aE:A~I"JG ~C";',-lCO
CIR(;UL.4R e:U.:,:JT·CAi" CIRCJlA.~ E~UP';'tCA;' CiFi:CUl.A~ fU.·PTiCAt
.0 \ t·. 3 C E ? 1·.J"'E~ CA'::;€ Ou·€:R CACE' ,I\N£:~ c.:..CE Ol.TER CAGE" ~!:NrORCC!.l:::r-. - L\f',~~ C4CE O>.;T~=l: CAC::
REjNFl)ilcq.41:~r RW.:·C~CD/.LNr ~c;",rORCI::r..lr:N" ~Cl'lr·Oi~CC:\':\. T r~~~~~c~CC!JCf\T
"'
",INot-a ~'JoIl:
90J 0,90 'GC 1003 ~C22 '0' 0 1029 0.64

"
- - - - - ·l.6 ;.6 140 5-S""'T' III !:-e..,fT''l' ",I) ,.. 0.4- 6-~r'Y'~~ 6-B1""';m~ 9174- 1~76i
lC5;:: .. 05 1168 ' '57 .. 75 1194 D.e •• . - - - - ~~ B A~ Hit) 6 .. l!mro"¢ 6·-8,.",.,.\11 :e."- ~,C 9 ~ 5-8,'-"',", 6-S"'ln'Q '(JiQJ 160S~
1:'00 ' .,0

,. lJJ<4 'J5J :J~O 1.359 0.54 - - - . - ~ 7.8 iO.6 19.!; t)-8r"l""'t,ll 6-8rr'\""0 11.0 6 .• '2., 6-81'l" •.•••
: e -B~'""Q , 2232 ieJ.l.9
. . ......
1500 .. 50 :SC ~ 6 G .; • E~~ '070 1630 C.S4 . - - - 25.0 'itl.C 2d.C 6-~r"'r"~
6-8"1"'0 17,ol- 1O,':' 19.4 6-e.-~t; (j·8r>'l1'l"1l '~23' nB6
NOTE:
i"'l( :~~SS CF PI:)E ::;=:-'R::S?)J1 rrl~ M:~:Ml.M C-l()AC r-;~tDEC 7\)
;)~OOJCE ,l, 0,;0 !.I1,.UV.::TER CRACI< O~ :.. ThR~~ ::nGE aEAR:~~G TEST
WjC IS DES:O:ATD ~ A5N-~70 G~ :'AS""rO ~.'170 sr:;';::NGi-i TES·
'·EaJq~v.£\.rs :::~q CLASS.
SdHT cO~r£"'n I Pll!I'A.REO 3\"
STANDARD SrReNGTl-1 REINFORCED lll'SO'. """~='''''lI.

STANOARD WIO 121METER CONCRE'!"E PIPE ct.lvERT Cfl_~~~:lIITll
REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE DiMENSlC,..S. REBAR SCHECU:.e, !Ol'IoIIIfl'l J/t>oC~!f'YI«~A.~

CULVERT CC~ETE ST~ENGiHANOTEST ~",,,,;o"""""",,'
REQlIiREJ,iE-'TS j(lASS It ANtI rl) I CtgUC ~ ·,lIEU fl;uI'\ ~:l,I
I _( ••~
BUREAU OF DESIGN, WATER PROJECTS DIVISION·
STANDARD COMBINATION OF
BORED/STEEL SHEET PILE FOR
BANK PROTECTION
s
PLAN
1~n£ws.2llClI* r-.
~----~---,~-:
;;
12"""'- /
L--
I
j-:
Lt~~~_u~,~
I
'-- I
'1--'1"'""""""'2000",,
('A\ TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT DETAILS OF PARAPET WALL

i ~
[ .. - [-.' "
\ J $CAll ~ :20ln
___ .
-r-t-'-~~
.J._~_._,._._J._.
BAAS
ELEVATION
o TYPICAL DETAILS OF PILE COPING

ICAi.,(
CD i------
I:ji;
£ ~,-I
[J,
! .. ~_.
1.-, .. <' )
.L:~ --L?II ®-SI~IL' --,'::: ,- ::". r---
® "'lC. ®-f/O.
{LR
~-~Ii,-i
M
r-l~
CDa:=r---lJI
~I - _., '''' ••• ''''1'< •••• 0.'.
'I' '---<.L'l2lowrlf0300llEBWO,C. '-- ::-
~ CONSTRUCTION JOINT DETAIL 1~.3OCSlWlIJ'SOC.
l '''---(!.;'l211V1lf 0 XC)S!lMJI'$ o.c.
~_.m~_J __5CX:_ j '-lW __ :..""_

:a=
c)
tl',;[OOV!JllW!S
8\ TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT DETAILS OF PARAPET WALL ~OMETRIC VI~. OF REVETME~

)
~l;:~ilARtOS~ OArr:
O!<SIGtf --.~~~ ~
~III!IU'
~~.~""T·J 1
~~~"~.~1o:Jo
C-;(.:l([(ll ~"'~!.~'lM
1"otIt..n~.~-\-\
SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT FOR STANDARD 15M LENGTH BORED PILE
I, ----- -, \ "
H~
~,
,-,
' '~"
q,!, \ \
.'~i
0»
--1'-1 _\_,'~
_
1-- ,--- ,'---'--; --~ a: !~ - ~
L,-I '
f.--_~_~--I ift'G)
!:~' ,- , .. .
I'U iJtC1'H ~
I"", / '
-
, .J
.. _,
~ - i" ! ""
«00>1
)A~ w~(1MI)
'-'CH'" l'OTN..W
l..bIOTH(II'l),
i
"'""" C_l
..
(001
. .., ..---+-- lSNl't

•• ,
.. - ·
(C~ ;'
--I i -1-+---------
I
••,"
.., 11"
"..
,
u._
.-
II •••• ~ 1
"""
"".:1:10I '""
'10'
...'"'"
I
..'"
,~
'"
n.,,",
C) ~T~~~
iI
..
I
I
•• " I:=)i ""
.1.4&Cl
,I j
I •• .. j IaI MooM)
•• l:t::)i " .. lU,,Wl un ,HUH)
'-""
,, " "
2l i ••"-1! • •• !:~l! j ~U7~
...
1.57&
...""
I
~'
L-
I
p&
':~o ~; --20 " -, " "41 "'"

200>-1
• "" 'OIl - "
31.400---+
•••• i ·U.~'
!
II lQ
••
u"''''
si.' NOTt: 'l!1f~&QAtll; ~ r1f I!OM:~M.a.! lO'IWolCOlClfbSMU. • .liS$HOJllj!ll.OW:
i
.
"
;
!
111£tlIAII£1U ~ ':'If( am PU AAO1t!Ihf~
«IIAAOAADfOll H:l/Il1ViOtO~~
IAA SiZES. .wtAHGO(Ht
r:I'~!wr.titS IJNDOl ~,I(,C0N0t1\ONS
AMI SP~CHC INO;(;ArtO
AIlO SHAC.!l£
SJB.tt1m fOIl ./lHAL'l!iSt'l CAS( M NCGnSMY IIf',Nl#jCWAC"'" t()IC,l.ttD H10'1t 1$ HOTWfT
: t~ -'HOLCIHOOtPlLfSA.Iij;It[~
I ~OTES:
f A.:J1fJW"
1IIOICA'ItD ~ 9lA:J. caoJo NfO OlSfotrHC[SOIl Sll!3IHo1tl.NOT Ktc.N.[O ll)/I' ~ 1ItdlI'llW.
~, 8.,,*,t[/tH.!;
I. WhMJl,j CCln'II($.Sttt mtIlCl'll Of COJ(;Jt(1'[ • :e DAYSSKlU. 1[, Ie' • %1 W'o
2. ..u~SIVU. •. tlIWl!iKl.!lf'''41.~
t.SPl,.CN;;
-. 1. ~
t
orlNl!WlSl ~1KS1'JllCO[ilH..JE:IlI"'-1'ti.y
~HOflI2OIfI,\j.PINl(:iM~C.uQl\)~1#(t.4'U2
Sf'\lU91Pftl,r.1ItNQllallOOtrW.l.8(v.PW\C00IIOllM~."M$~\)P1P\W
~ olAJ,I,Ct'fTl!l>M SO AS IlOT:gOCOJlllAr 110(
------1 f'Oll120 SlIM. $KIU K: l~ lI1l.!eo>om ShlU. O(ADOI'T[O 'OA'" SPAll..
1. ~r6IP1IlN."fJ,fO«CfW(NT$IoW.l.KPllOWl£DI't" 1/z00AAnI1MOfIMilt8M4ftAtHOtO
_,,(~;:~=o.c. Of' $PM. WT.
D. CAST-tl~"l.<£ (ClPJ 00Ht!lCIt "-t.;

l. 1'HECO~CflO'" '" ClP "'-D S'>W.!.f'Ol.L.Oil'M IltlMltlllfNTS 17 ~"ll)IS fOIl em- •• "'Ja ,"US 011
L.
1.
""""""'"
MAC!Ult.l!HCrnl! 01' P'l.n SkflL:,!I(wtQ CIll1\ol(Sf4 ec ••••
"mO/olS[)I(;OW!t!ltt: ou:tNQ 8OIQ/IlC\IIIoIICIt
'MU'l'IlDTK ~1WlNCCNW;1rt.
l.~r~~o~:O(J£~~~~1.:fl1~~fXlf"l(~~-=rC;IE
WE"!tlUlWICOH1T'tJC'rlOH,I'Hl ~II SHNJ.K NaTntl roR~Of'l"l.E~ ~'«tSWl'.
t.. .o.ltQlrl~Sllt!l.elUflrpl(( ~ 9WJ.AlSO I( 1.11-1:01~ ClJIlfttJ~ r'Olt
~mHM-'If1".A1"IOf'( Of' WI. c.7A, l.jRO'" M OUKJI.
a. lRUIl tw1 $IolAU.t( COIS1flVC1DllM ~ STA8'.! 'My "fhM' ~ M SCI.. Jr./IO~ (l!I(UIO ""'JUI.
'l'l1[ 10.£ ~4l..i.K:JNSI'£tTEO,1JI SlllWl1'lQ5 ~fr(l 'Uu!( a.£AII r1f.lll.l.l.OOSt W,l.'TtJIlAl
ACO.:WlM.I'Et"'TMIOT'l'OWAI'1tIl:~GOPEAA1IIr«lf8llllrnil'll.£CJiU'()rIl('CClIGTlrIICIt.lIHMI'COOT1l)otS.
c:M!MA~ t;'/f ~ ~;M2 OR \It\' t./O'lXllJSlNC IINTC!Iltt' lU.'!' JE tISEO.
~r Ill-\(
(b-b': SECTION
a.COh1Cfttr.'.N(lotlJ»£DPU:St\lU.lE9I'~WCl'IlOC,lIilCAS(0f0/f'l'~.MtPl'Ul3¥£'1t1eCl
\.~) "" ''''''
1)£ ectan: JIWJ. 8! CONSOl.O\TtO rr ....wof'C1t.
7. 0C1M.£!)IIOItOOCIl.Ol1fMlPflOCtOUll(FOl!MeMElll'lllCCNml.lC>Dl91lC.KSl,b.lr11tD!l'H
~ f'(It~". t\of ~1fIll"'TlW 1).f1lf!lt 1JQ000S'tAMOf'\laI!O PUiQ roAKS
-~-- ,,.,..,
.~- ;~_~~_fOO~
8
~o
200.0 1200,11
-
llOCl.ll1l'l
(C-C\ SECTION
~PICAL SECTIONALELEVATIONAND BARSP~~ ,
-' .... - .. -- .... ----
'400.0 JIOO,'
l:10Cl0Q
oICIClO.4on ...•~ ... \J "" '''''"''
~=~
r.t'~' ~
I
I
i
STANDARO COMBIM
! BOREDfSTEEL SHi:ET PILE
PROTECTION
TlON OF
FOR BANK
I
TYPICAl SECTIONAL ELEVATiON Af.iO B"'R
SPliCE. SCHEDulE OF REINFORCCMENi
FOR STANDARD 15m LENGTH BORED PILE
&. GENERAl NOT£S
~
C~(W
C~llIAf~~·IIl!T"
~~~ ..
1II;tt;(~~lJI,I
-~,~
PLAN ELEVATION
BOO
,A=~u
10mm THK. STEEL CASING
CL OF SSP
CL OF BORED PILE
--A,·~,·
\ )~ }hh -J-- ~l
SORED PiLE
\--SEE SPOT DETAIL _
--'/.(
//V' II
. '"', V \
\f ---7---
I
10mm THK STEEL CONNECTOR
(FULL WELD TO SORED PILE
fULLY WELD
_ --.Lj' "- -~., -l.- ST!:EL CA~NG &: STEEL SHEET
! I' PILE)
, AliGNEO ALONG lHE
.. -f GROOvE' ,------ -----
8-lVPICAL BORED PILE ro SSP f.9.!il'l,g;_I!9.~~
GENERAL NOT!:S:
I. All WORl( SHALL. B£ CONE IN ACOOWA/'fCE 'tilTH AU
PRO~~S ~ ITtJA 1716-P1UNG AND 11(1.1 1111-st'EET
PilES O~ OP\IM STAAOAAO SPEc1FlCATlONS.
2. BEFORE/.)('( WORK8£GNS IN E~IRONt.lOOAI..LY S£MilM

MEAS. TEllPOAARY EROSION CO"lTROL MEASURES ANO PROPER
UA.HN::EI4ENT PlW:TICES SHALL BE iN PtACE.
NOTE:
v
1 All T'Et.<PORAA'( FENCING FOR PROTECTEO ARfAS SHN..L B(
iHSTALl.EO PRIOR TC CO/r,lUENCEUENT or WRit 1. 1liE STtEL CON~LCTOR TO BE 'fiElDED AlONGSlOC cr THE
-,- f S1tEL CASlNC or 11<£ BOREll P1lE SIWJ. "A>l: A L!NC1I<
\
EQUAl. TO 1I<E LENC1I< or !HE ADJACENT ST!l:L 9«(T Pli.
4. lOW ~OUNO OfSTUR8lNG
EIMRONMENT;UY
EQUIPMENT ShAll SE UTitZO IN
SDISI1l'VE .AREAS AS .APPROvED BY Ttt: CM .•• .c I
~
E~Wi-'N-CtW«iE.
STEEL SI1EEJPLES SHALl IotEET n1E REQUIREt.lENiS OF'

tJ 2. "-' SURfACES 10 6E WELOEOSHOUlC BE tREE Of PNNT,
stAG, lOOst SCALE, RUST AN{) OTl-lER FOROCN ~TOf.Al.S.
MSHTO W 202 (1151\1 A328). OR AASHfO M 21l TH JOINTS l. CROlM WWl S'<AU. EXTENDTHE ,JU, LE:;C1l< DlAAIlJtR OF
Sw.Ll BE PRACTiC'.AUY WATER-TlGKT
Pl>CE.
WHEN nit PUS ARt IN
____ w _ '!HE BOR:EO Pll.E CASINC OESlCN CRfT'ERlk
WEl.D<NC(SllAW P'OCESS)
6. SHtFJ PILES SrWl. e£ ~ TO £l.rw.~ SHOWNIN CN'l(;rrY Of wElOiNC • 0.7071 • O.JF\J
ftiE PLAN OR AS DIRECTED 8Y ENGtN((R-1N~CH4i'.C(' W = WIDTH, h = HEIGHT, t = THICKNESS All.OWAa£ $l<EARINGSTRESS • 0.3Of\I
WtlO srm. ELECTRODE:. LOW 1fl'00000N AWS/~UE: 5.1: DOH5
7. T!-lE REOUl'tf"'ENTS ~'ERNING fl;(: INSfALlATlON OF SHEET ltNSLS: ST.i;l(NG'rH • 595 uPA
PILING SHAL:. C~~l.l (N GEhERAi.. TO THOSE COYERHI~C 'llWlU+G STRDlCTt1 • 450 Iol?A
StAA:lt>lGPilES ~ SET fORTtf UNO£R ITEM 4<iO- PIUNG Of' oPWH ru • ~3 OPA
5TANO"QO SPECf'lCAnQN. (-'\ STEEL SHEET PILE DETAIL 4. THE CENTERUNEOF SSP s.1.IAU.HAl,{ PARAU£L OISTANC(
8. THE lENGTt1 A~O SECTlCN wOOl!LUS Of STttl. SI1E.£T PIl£
SH.&U aE 8"sro l7'l THE RESUlT C% TrfE GtOTECHNtCAl
~.J'" to - FRQI,l 1I<E CEN1tRUNE Of 1I<E BOREQ ~LE Of AT lEAST
"AU' THE "EICHT Of THE SSP ilUT NOT CfltATER :l<" ~
IN',/(STlGAnON ANO STABIUTY .t.NAI.VS(S. or THE Dh\L1EttR OF' tlIE ~C PIlE,
~!l:EPAA£:l5\' OArE
DE~. l,lAJ!a=:lWlt
STANDARD COMBINATION 0,
'SOREDiSTEEL SHEET PILE ,OR BANK
, TYPICAl SORED P!LE TO SSP
CONNECTION OETAIL. i c•••••• ~':.!PA'TU
SHEET PllE OET6.1l
PROTECTION ~'" i ~~~~,~'
I I ~ND GE~ERAL NOTES
~,t R'<:~l~:-'~
":

BONIFACIO DRIVE, PORT AREA, MANilLA
.'
STANDARD RUBBLE
MOUND BREAKWATER
GENERAL NOTES
6. THE WEIGHT OF THE STONES PER LAYER SHALL BE CALCULATED BASED ON THE PROCEDURES
I. DESIGN CRITERIA AND SPECIFICATIONS INDICATED IN THE USACE COASTAL ENGINEERING MANUAL, 2011.
1. DPV-JH DESIGN GUIDELINES, CRITERIA AND STANDARDS 2015· VOLUME II AND III
2.
3.
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
PHILIPPINE PORTS AUTHORITY MANUAL, 2009
(USACE) COASTAL ENGINEERING MANUAL, 2011 NO.
1
MINIMUM ROCK WEIGHT
W. ARMOR
LAYER
LAYER
.,
THICKNESS
2 Wo/l0 FIRST UNDER LAYER h
II. DESIGN CONDITIONS 3 Wo/200 SECOND UNDER LAYER

••
1. BEDDING LAYER THICKNESS (loJ CONSIDERATIONS: (USE IM-iICHEVER IS GREATER) 4 W, 14000 CORE
•. FOR WAVE ATTACK STABILITY

• 2· 3 TIMES THE DIAMETER OF LARGE STONES OF THE EXISTING SEABED 7. THE REQUIRED DESIGN ANALYSES (SLOPE STABILITY AND OVERALL STABILlTY,ETC.) SHALL BE CONDUCTED.
• l00mm FOR COARSE SAND

• 200mm FOR GRAVEL
m. LEGEND
b. FOR FOUNDATION STABILITY B • CREST WIDTH Bt = TOE BERM WIDTH
• 600mm (MINIMUM THICKNESS) a

R = RUN-UP HEIGHT INCLINATION ANGLE OF BREAKWATER
2. BEDDING LAYER SHOULD EXTEND 1500mm HORIZONTALLY BEYOND THE TOE COVER.
3. ARMOR AND UNDER LAYER MATERIALS ARE QUARRY STONES.
= DESIGN HIGH WATER HEIGHT tn = LAYER THICKNESS
4. WAVE HEIGHT, H, SHALL BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE CALCULATIONS. FOR THIS STANDARD tal • BEDDING LAYER THICKNESS W. = STONE WEIGHT
PLAN, H IS EQUAL TO THE SIGNIFICANT WAVE HEIGHT, H..,
5. THE TOE BERM WIDTH (1\) SHOULD BE THE MAXIMUM OF 2H OR 0.4h (USE LOWER WATER LEVEL) = TOE BERM HEIGHT H = WAVE HEIGHT
AND AT LEAST 3 STONES WIDE. DEPTH OF WATER FROM TOP OF TOE BERM
TO STILL WATER LEVEL
W = WIDTH
SEA SIDE SIDE
a:
-- - - - -
DESIGN HIGH WATER
- - -- -- ~ - - - - - - --- - -- - - - --
STILL WATER LEVEL
----- ------~-------
.0
.s::
SEABED
w
BEDDING
U
1500mm
O~~:PICAL SECTle5~
SHEET TITLE: SHEET CONTENTS n,,,,,n.., ••••••

REPUBUCOFTHfPHlUPPINES
~ DEPARTMENTOFPUBUCWJRlCSANOHIGHWAYS
,
( ) BUREAU OF DESIGN STANDARD RUBBLE GENERAL NOTES AND
WATERPROJECTSDMSION MOUND BREAKWATER TYPICAL SECTION
• -- 1tONlFN::1O CAlVE. PORT A.R6A.1MNl.A
..
SHORE LINE ~
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
(/)
w
oc
:;
as
t
. I
<0
"
j
as
VARIES
o PLAN
SCAlE: 1:300 mls.
c:
DESIGN HIGH WATER
----------------~----------------------
STILL WATER LEVEL
----- ------~-------
a
.c
1.5m
PROFILE
SCALE: 1:95 mts.
SHEET CONTENTS SUBMITTED

SHEET TTTlE;
REPUBUC OF THE PHIUPfINES
OEPAsuER'EAu'oFDES'GNAYS STANDARD RUBBLE PLAN AND PROFILE

WATER PROJECTS DMSDN MOUND BREAKWATER
• BONIFACIO DRIVE, PORT AAEA. MANILA
STANDARD RUBBLE
MOUND JETTY WITH
GEOTUBE CORE
GENERAL NOTES
I. DESIGN CRITERIA AND SPECIFICATIONS 4. BEDDING I GRAVEL LAYER
1. DPWH DESIGN GUIDELINES. CRITERIA AND STANDARDS 2015 - VOLUMES II AND III STONES SHOULD BE WELL BLENDED. THE STONES WITH THE LARGEST DIMENSION, GRATER THAN THREE
TIMES THE LEAST DIMENSION SHOULD NOT CONSTITUTE MORE THAN 10 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL.
2.DPWH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS, 2013 EDITION
3. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE) COASTAL ENGINEERING MANUAL, 2011 MATERIALS SHOULD BE INERT TO CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL DEGRADATION IN SEA WATER.
4. PHILIPPINE PORTS AUTHORITY MANUAL, 2009

GRADATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE BEDDING LAYER OF FILTER BLANKET SHALL BE D15 (FILTER) < 5 085
(FOUNDATION); i.e. THE DIAMETER EXCEEDED BY THE COARSEST 85 PERCENT OF THE FILTER MATERIAL
II. DESIGN CONDITIONS MUST BE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO FIVE TIMES THE DIAMETER EXCEEDED BY THE COARSEST 15 PERCENT OF
THE FOUNDATION MATERIAL. QUARRY SPALLS RANGING IN SIZE FROM 0.45 KG TO 23 KG WILL GENERALLY
1. ORIENTATION OF JETTY IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE SHORELINE'. HENCE, OVERTOPPING IS ALLOWED SUFFICE IF THE BEDDING LAYER IS PLACED ON A FILTER CLOTH OR A COARSE GRAVEL (OR CRUSHED
AND MUST BE PROVIDED WITH FREEBOARD OF AT LEAST 1.0m FROM HIGH-HIGH WATER LEVEL STONE) FILTER LAYER WHICH MEETS THE STATED FILTER DESIGN CRITERIA.
2. CONSIDER NON-BREAKING WAVES ONLY
THE FOLLOWING STANDARD TESTS SHALL BE CONDUCTED TO ESTABLISH MATERIAL DURABILITY:
3. DESIGN WAVE HEIGHT SHALL BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE ANALYSIS
4.BEDDING LAYER MUST BE ATLEAST 1.5m BEYOND THE TOE OF THE COVER STONE. ABRASION TEST ASTM C-535 OR EQUIVALENT
TOUGHNESS TEST ASTM CoHO OR EQUIVALENT
HARDNESS TEST ASTM C-235 OR EQUIVALENT
III. MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIRE ME TS APPARENT SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND ABSORPTION TEST ASTM C-127 OR EQUIVALENT
1. ARMOUR COVER
5. GEOTEXTTILES
THE WEIGHTS AND LAYER THICKNESS FOR THE ARMOUR COVER SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN
GEOTEXTILES SHALL BE WOVEN ANDI OR NONWOVEN FABRIC AS SPECIFIED IN THE DRAWINGS SPECIALLY
THE PLAN & SCHEDULE. QUARRY STONES SHALL BE ROUGH AND ANGULAR. EXPOSED ARMOUR
ROCKS SHALL BE CLASS II ROCKS WITH A MINIMUM OF 500KG PER PIECE OR AS SPECIFIED IN ENGINEERED TO PROVIDE EXCELLENT ROBUSTNESS, UV PROTECTION AND DURABILITY IN MARINE AND
THE SCHEDULE. TOE PROTECTION OR SUBMERGED ROCKS SHALL BE CLASS I ROCKS WITH A HYDRAULIC CONDITION (SEE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS), THE GEOTEXTILES TO BE USED SHALL HAVE
MINIMUM OF 2000 KG PER PIECE OR AS SPECIFIED IN THE SCHEDULE. NO STONE SHALL HAVE A HIGH MODULUS AND EXTREMELY HIGH STRENGTH AT LOW STRAIN. IT MUST HAVE A GOOD WATER
LONGEST DIMENSION LESS THAN 'TWO NOR MORE THAN THREE TIMES ITS SHORTEST PERMEABILITY AND IS RESISTANT TO CHEMICAL AND BACTERIOLOGICAL ATTACK. PLACEMENT AND MATERIAL
DIMENSION AS DETERMINED ALONG PERPENDICULAR AXES PASSING THROUGH THE STRENGTH IS AS SPECIFIED IN THE SECTION DRAWINGS.
APPROXIMATE CENTER OF GRAVITY.
2.CORE MATERIAL 6. GEOTUBES
THE CORE MATERIAL (CLASS II ANDIOR CLASS III ROCKS) SHALL HAVE A WEIGHT OF > 3.75KG GEOTUBES TO BE USED SHALL BE MANUFACTURED FROM HIGH MODULUS POLYPROPYLENE ENGINEERED
PER PIECE AS SPECIFIED IN THE SCHEDULE. QUARRY STONES SHALL BE ROUGH AND FABRICS COMBINED WITH HIGH CAPACITY SEAMS TO PRODUCE TUBULAR CONTAINERS WITH ENSURED
ANGULAR. INTEGRITY DURING FILLING AND DURING OPERATIONAL LIFE. THE TENSILE STRENGTH IS AS SPECIFIED ON
THE SECTION DRAWINGS. GEOTUBES MANUFACTURED FROM POLYESTER FIBER SHALL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
THE GEOTUBE SUPPLIER! MANUFACTURER SHALL CERTIFY COMPLIANCE OF THESE REQUIREMENTS.
3. STONE PLACEMENT
EACH STONE WILL BE INDIVIDUALLY PLACED BY EQUIPMENT SUITABLE FOR LIFTING. 7. SAND INFILL
MANIPULATING AND PLACING STONES OF THE SIZE AND SHAPE SPECIFIED. EACH STONE SHALL
BE PLACED WITH ITS LONGEST AXIS PERPENDICULAR TO THE ARMOR SLOPE. PLACING THE SAND INFILL MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF NATURALLY OCCURRING OR PROCESSED MATERIAL WHICH
EFFORTS SHALL ENSURE THAT EACH STONE IS FIRMLY SET AND SUPPORTED BY UNDERLYING AT THE TIME OF FILLING IS CAPABLE OF FULFIlliNG THE SPECIFIED REQUIREMENTS TO PROVIDE MASS AND
INTEGRITY, THE FILL MATERIAL SHALL NOT CONTAIN MATERIALS SUSCEPTIBLE TO VOLUME CHANGE (i.e.
MATERIALS AND ADJACENT STONES. LOOSE STONES SHALL BE RESET OR REPLACED.
MARINE MUD, SWELLING CLAYS AND COLLAPSIBLE SOILS), PEAT, VEGETATION, TIMBER. ORGANIC, SOLUBLE
OR PERISHABLE MATERIAL. TOXIC, COMBUSTIBLE OR DANGEROUS MATERIAL, METAL, RUBBER OR OTHER
UNSUITABLE MATERIAL.
8. ALL QUANTITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL DIMENSIONS. ELEVATIONS AND STATIONING
SHALL BE VERIFIED BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION,
i SHEET TlilE. j SHEET CONTENTS

r - - -- ,-~ i .. --.------
I
STANDARD RUBBLE MOUND

GENERAL NOTES
JETTY IMTH GEOTUBE CORE
VARIES
~~- - --- - ,
L HEAD L TRUNK
--_._.~~- -
! ARMOUR COVER
1
I
I
::[ ;----
r£
-'
-- ,
ri:i
__ J. !
r£
,- __.r J_
....:~2 =:r ~~ = J -- . - :~I-
ARMOUR ROCK
o
V A'R I E S DIMENSION 1M)
TYPE A
STRUCTURE STRUCTURE
TRUNK HEAD
rc~:A N 1:300mts. HEIGHT Hrltv"'l< H",,,,

CREST VV10TH WT"tll'lil.
W"''''
BERM 1 B,T~_, B.~,+.O
VARIES L HEAD L TRUNK BERM 2 e..l/1"Nl'!
!'~~
BASE \MOTH B .•..••
uNl< B",no
('-- ARMOUR LAVER
BEDOING LAYER
i
It-,,,,llllJt •.••
i
lo....Hf.o.o
SCOUR PROTECTION REINFORCeMENT ,..,AT \t\\lltl_ ~I.!"'l.-D
I
\ Ii 1J
~.~~
-~~
JEryv OOTTOIol
.-.._::::::_~.::::::-
_---::::::::J::. _:--:-:::::,~-.~::_.:_
.:-::::::::, ___ I
o VARIES
~A~.o F I ~;mts
__ I
REPUBLIC
DePARTMENT
OF THE PtilllPPtNES
Of PUBlIC
BUREAU OF DESIGN
WORI(S AND HIGHWAYS
WATER PROJECTS DIVISION

aO~IF"C:O O~''A. "'JAT ,utE.&. M.o.H'lA
STANDARD
JETTY WITH
RUBBLE
GEOTUBE
MOUND
CORE
I SHEET CONTENTS
.y----"--
I
! PLAN & PROFILE

"
•.. -
, PltIPNlID
t •. , .
REC~MENDlNGAPPROVAL:
MINIMUM ROCK WEIGHT
NO. LAYER
STRUCTURE STRUCTURE
TRUNK HEAO
ARMOUR LAYER 500 kg/pc 750 kg/pc
CORE ROCKS 3.75 kg/pc 3.75 kg/pc
SCOUR PROTECTION 2000 kg/pC 3000 kg/pc
jCRESTl
I
FREEBOARD:
I
GEOTUBE
I
,JETTY BOTTOM) 10..
i
I.em i
-!
I FilTER FABRIC
~- "-- BEDDING LAYER
I
i -- REINFORCEMENT MAT (OPTIONAl)
I
I
i
B
SECTION
1:75mts.
REPUBLIC Of THE PHIliPPINES

SHEET TITLE· RECOMMeNCING
1------- -
APPROVAL.:
----1--~---
j APPROVE
1--'---'
I aETNO (SHl. NO.
-.-
Ld 1----=--
DEPARTMENTOf PUBliC ~KS ANDHIGHWAYS
BUREAU OF DESIGN STANDARD RUBBLE MOUND

WATER PROJECTS DIVISION JETTY WITH GEOTUBE CORE ir 1 -- -- ~I~! 3
~II'Jl(.ro OR1\1l:..PORT .-.pE" l.fJIN'lA 1ST OM DQRI":; '3
I
_~
•••••• lloo •••
I
, i-I
I
•
BUREAU OF DESIGN,WATER PROJECTS DMSION
STANDARD SLOPE PROTECTION WORKS

a. Details of Different Types of Revetment
b. Details of Curtain Walls and Berm
c. Details of Foot Protection Works of Revetment
RECOt.ll.lENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED BY:
De~ d Pllbllc Work, WId HIghwtya

otnc. of the Secretary
II mil 001111111111111111
WIN6R01229
·" ,
OfSlGNFLOOOLE\18. onlGN fLOOD l£VB.
GMDED GRAva WitH THE tAllGERONfS

I"tACEO AO.J,Io,ClNt TO HOleS AS SHO¥<fN
RIVERBED wt:EPtfOlES S"AOOlRfDAT 2DOOmm
N'EIVAL AIOYf TllE 0ItDNA1lY WArat lMl.
1lMR""
SEe DETAILS ON SHEET NO.E}1 SEE DfTAILS ON SHEET NO. E}1 SEE DETAILS ONSHEET NO.EB
T1M8flt,REtlFORCEO CONCI!fTf.
OR STEEL SHEtTPlE
C) ~. BOULDER RIP~~~ 2 GROUTED RIPRAP

SCAl!: UIOM.
(:)
MATTRESS REVETMENT
W I SHEET PILE
SCALE: 1::80M.
DES~ FLOODliVB.
R!V£ReEO
RlVER8EO RIVERBED
• b c
$O'J 2000 1000
MATTRESS REVETMENT W/OlJT MATTRESS REVETMENT WI GABION

C) GABION
SCAli!;
REVETMENT (PilE UPI
1:8aM.
250 1000 600
~ ClJT -OFF WAll FOUNDA nON CUT-OFF WAll FOUNDATION

SCAL!: 1::80M. I;80M.
DeIGN ROOD LML DESIGN FLOOO LfVB.
GltAOEO GAAva WIfN THE I.ARGERONES

P1ACEO ADJACENT TO HOlfS AS SHCNtM
WfiPfiOUS $TAOGEREOAT2lXJOrrn'I
INTfRV AL ABOVE THE ORDINARY WATER LEVa
3OClmrT:ITHICKRU8Blf
CONe •••••
SEE DErAIlS ON SHEET NO.E}1

RUBBLE CONCRETE WI
NOTE:
CCJoFKlF.ATlCHTYFt: OF SLCPE PROTECTIONWORKS & LeGTH OF
TOE PROTECOON SH.fJ.lBE BASED ON Sf ABIUlY ANAl. YSIS & SCOUR
AIW. YSl S,RESPeCTI\fl Y.
o RUBBLE CONCRETE REVETMENT
SCAlf:
GRAVITY WAll (TYPE II)
SCAlE: 1;80M.
~rrent of Pubic Works n HI;~
0IIal <If the Seetebl ry
IIUUII~UI.nlllllllllml
WIN6R91229
•••• NO. IHIlT ••••
REPU8UC OF THE PHILIPPINES
8 DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
BUREAU OF DESIGN
WATER PROJECTS llIVISI<)<j
TYPICAL SECTIDNS TYPES OF REVETMENTS
J •
OESlGN R.OOO LfVB..

r DESIGN FlOOOLEYS.
12nYn" RflNFORCING S1EEL GRADED GaAva WITH 'tHf LARGERONES

IloO.RSSfACED.4lXlnTnO£.rm PLACfO AI)JACENTTO I1OL.E5 AS SHOWN
"""''''' WEEPHOLes ST"GGERlD AT 2OlXlrm'I

lNTE~AL I,toVETltEOROIHAR'l' WATERlEVa
GAllION FOoT PIlOTEC'OON (PROVDE

WHEN TtIEtE IS HEAVY SCOIAl1HOj
C9 ~~FORCED CONCRETE REVETM~~~

~ REINFORCED CONCRETE REVETMENT
SCALE: lSOM,
RM'''''
CONCRETE BLOCK
SCAlE: 1:80M..
COCONa."
SOD<lll<G
r omGN R.OODLEVa
~
l.om.X l.om.GRAvafK)j(
OMI'" WRAf"I"EO
WI NON
--\-- ..• wOVfNO£OTfX'Il.E
L ?.am. x lOOmm wa HOmZOffl"L

STRI" DAAt(. dlmO£.SPACING
RetoIfORCEO GRANLlAR Fill
98.1 COMPACTION ASTM [).691
NOTE:
1. CONFMJURAl1()N1TYPE
AWilYSl5,RESPECTm,V.
OF SLOPE PROTEC11ON~KS a
I lENGTH
ra: PROTECTlON SHALl BE iWlED ON STMiUTY ANAL YSlS & SCOlA
o MSE GABION
SCALE:: I:80M.
~ 810 ENGINEERING I1'fPE I)

~ L£NGTH"" S'TRENolTH Of GEOOmO SlW. BE BASED ON DESIGN SCALE: lSJM. Deporlrrent of Pubic _ks "'" H1g~_
ANAlYSIS AHJ CAI.Cl1l.AilON. OrrtC8of u,. SeofetIry
IIIIIIUIII•• IIIIIIIIIII
WIN6R01229
_IT.
8
REPUBLIC OF THE fHIUPPINES
DEPARTMENT Of PUBUC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
BUREAU OF DESIGN nPICAl SECTIONS nPES OF REVETMENTS

WATERPROJECTS DMSION
NOTES: .
10. AllOWABlEOESIGNVELocmES
1_ fIRCMOE tAlM. WIDE BERM FORRE't'ETUENT HElOHT GREATeRnWl4.0 II\. TO BE lOCATED
MlDWAYOf~tEDfT. RE'lEYMENT AI.LOWABLEDESIGN
2. FRE£BOARD IiW..1. BE MSEOON 11£ OOC8MWELl All CHTHI! WEMOIWOJU~TED
1..N:21,2Ot1a'8R.8 , 1YPE \<£lOCllY m/S
~ ONFlOODCOIfTRa.N«JIDlO~ITANlWCDB
s. 6PECIFlC OAAVI1Y FOR ITOHE8 FOR lOOfl£ 9:lU.DERNIAOM SH.H.LBE15 G) 3.0
4, LfMaTH CE SCOLll: PROTUOON 61W1. BE 1lABB)'0N THE RESU.T8 Of 8COl.R __ YSlS
~ 3.0
llLOPE ITABlITY NW.Y&l8&M.l. BE PflEPNB)'ORF1JJU~ IWlKS
TO !IE PRJW;EOWlTKfl:EWTMENT8 W11l111EJQ4T0f1O "NlDAflOv£. @) 5.0
&. COCCMT IS I.ISEOTO PB:MOE IWMEIJATE1Il.JAF.tCf STABUZATXlN DlIWIG TIE fEJQ)
OF GERMl*TIOft /fNJ F'lAN1'£8THlJfHENf. (3) ".0
7. COCOFIBER LOGs.fA6ClNE8 ME COMPRE$SE) COCO fIEl "' .••N"I\.OM I£TTIIG TO
FORIII"l.ClQS"N"I'fAfW«:E @l 5~
QJCOfIBER tolAYBE 8TRATE<JCIU Y IH8TALLEOa.l L.C»«la.0PE8 TO IElJCE
INlENGTHNtO TON::f ASlNTERCEPTOADRNHSTOPOOLlI'&SlOWOCMM @) •. 5
WATER LONG EHOUGrt TO Nf'( 8fOI1IEtff TllAT •• 1N Tl£ Wt.TER TO 6tT'1\..E M.
I. ~.lSAwauREl«JlMEl)GRAS8l(NC1M(fORIT1EXfE~"J0TN3 5.0
8YSTDlWHICH REJrIOHlI'TO •••. ~
8.If'YDA08EED.I6tmlJWJTlCAl.lYN'PUEDSEEDlIIIXWI""'TERJ.I.lCH.8IJrI)IGMEf(]' 50
&FEIU'1JZa<S TO EA8l.YESTAilll&tVEGETATlONCtt'TREATEOAAEA
~~~~~~~m~m~~~~ >6.0
SEED ~NfJWHEAE &IT£161NACCEB8lIlLEORTOO t:MGEID.J8TOf\.IM
>e.o
5,0
~ ~.ENGINEERING {TY~~I~
3.0
5,0
3.0
3.0
3,0
o DETAIL OF BERM
o DETAIL OF CUT.oFF WALL

WITH CURTAIN WALL o DETAIL OF SHEET PILE WALL
IMTH CURTAIN WALL
o DETAILS OF CURTAIN WALL AND BERM

SCALE: 1:30M.
~ ORDINARY W.\TBll.EVB.
•••• OED
10l1m 0 STIRRUPS 10 PA8& T1ftI twOJN(.1

ltOLEi OF N'E8{ONESTlRf¥JPPERFUI
o TYPE - B (LOOSE BOULDER APRON)
NOTE:
CONFIGl.m:nowTYPE
TOE PROlECTION
Cf' SlOPE PROTECTION WORKS & L.EN3TH OF
SHHJ. BE BASED ON STABIUTY ANALYSIS & SCOJR
o TYPES OF FOOT PROTECTION o TYPE~C(C.IIT..t"lF=FW411 \
Oep.rtnnt of Public Worb .,d HIahMY'

~LYSlS,RESPEC1TVB..Y.
o TYPE -A (SHEET PILE) WORKS fOR REVETMENTS

$C"I£: l:30M.
otrloe of the Secret8ry
~IIIIIInil ~IIIIIIIIIIII
WIN6R01229
REPUBUC Of THE PHIllPPINES ••••••••••••••
8 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
BUREAU OF DESIGN
WATER PROJECTS DroI1SIOO
SOItFM;O OAM,POII.fNEAWM.A
-TYPICAL SECTIONS
-DETAIL OF CURTAIN WALL &. BERM
- TYPES OF FOOT PROTECTION FOR
REVETMENTS
TYPES OF REVETMENTS ""WIt
a.""",
TE~
---~..
;~'\
\ .,

•
BUREAU OF DESIGN,WATER PROJECTS DIVISION
STANDARD DETAILS OF GATES

a. FLAP GATE
b. SLIDE GATE
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED BY:
LEO L. UN
CliIEF, WATER PROJECTS D1V.,B.D.D.
_oIl'ublcW_,""H~"""
OffICllIofthe s.er.tIIty
m IUllnllmUUUWlIlN
WIN6R01230
-. ----
') oj ...•..
RECTANGULAR
WD~I!T'ITlJ
FLAP GATE
DIMENSION (rrmJ },,~L
=- 0••
HSOKfI~
300 X 300 450
A B
225
B
281.25
II"mI
456.25
4
~ 450Xeo 626 312.5 393.75 6Ui
~ I ~
~.tll: 7!50X450
750 X 75)
900 X eoo
SOOX900
eoo
925
1012.5
1100
1100
375
312.5
0468,76
-400
550
481.25 781.25
393.75
S43.7!5
626
887.6
825
1006.25
781.25
113'1.25
0 0 0 ~!
~ 1050X7SO 1300 481.25 581.26 .·956.25
I
, 1050X1050 1300 625 aao 1331.25
0 0 .tf!'.tI-
(~ ~
_I
1200X800 1400 400 475 731.25
po. 1200X£W 1400 550 681.25 1182.5
0 ~ :;;: 1200 X 1200 1450 ne 943.75 4543.75

0 1350 x 900 1575 562.5 687.5 1187.5
- - "'....
" I:~ 1350X 1350 1600 876 993.75 1S'OO
0 0
, ';~ ~
1500 X 7SJ
1600X900
1700
1750
475
575
eo6.2S
725
993.715
1200
0
IIrlr:±:
010 0
0 I
I .>B
,
. i/!II; j
1500X 1200
1500X 1500
1650X1050
1650X 1e60
1800X 1200
1900 X 1500
1750
1750
1900
1900
2050
2050
725
875
660
950
nl5
876
943.75
1143.751875
818.75
1300
943.75
1143.75
1543.75
. 1800X 1800 2050 1025 1388.75 2262.5

2100X15lX1 2350 875 1150 1893.75
f 2100X2100
2400 X 150:)
2350 1175 1556.25
1
2600
1
....•...• 2.400X2100 2700 17M 1582.5 2BOO
2.400 X 2400 2700 1725 2925
2700 X 2700 300C 500 900
3000 X 3000 3300 1.l;()O 2025 37'5
CIRCULAR FLAP GATE lTYPE n

~G DIMENSION (J'\'VT\) I'~L
lrrwn) A B B (mml
300 475 237.5 256.25 0418.75
350 526 262.5 312.5 0493.75
3 556.25 281.25 312.5 607.75
400 587.5 293.75 325 53126
450 618.75 312.5 293.75 825
500 687.5 3043.75 0406.26 lS56.25
525 700 350 .'2.5 8&4,5
600 BOO 400 481.25 781.25
875 850 425 531,25 887.5
7SJ 968.75 481.5 581.25 962.5
~ 515 881.5 1125
1050 650 812.5 1325
1200 7.43.75 943.75 1543.15
1350 331.25 993.15 1681.25
PWOT ADJUSlING N1.m
/
r--- ~~~OEOAOJUSTINQ
~5 ~
1950
2100
23375
2500
r:t25l1900
118875
1250
I po
MOUNTING IiOl..ES
22SO
20400
2650
28!SO
1$37.5
1175
-_.,-,-~. CIRCULAR FLAP GATE (TYPE II)
. ,'. ~rmIl
750
ABC
1&40 920 920
D
no
CIRCULAR FLAP GATE (TYPE I) ~ 1000
1500
2160
2800
10470 1080
10490 1400
eoo
1180
2000 3360 1680 1880 7W
300D 4060 2Oro 2030 1000
l.c -... A
NOTES:
1. HYDRO FLAP GATES ARE MADE OF CAST IRON OR DUCTLE IRON.
It 1 0 I 0~
~ I=~
I-
---1
A SMAlL DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE ATnie: BACK OF THE GATE CAUSES
IT TO OPEN AUTOMAl1CAU Y TO Iill.ON DISCHARGE THROUGH
SEWER LINES OR DRAINAGE CONDUITS. i\ttEN WATER ON THE FACE SIDE
LEVEES,
vAir1
OF THE GATE RISES ABOVE WATER ON THE BACK SIDE, lHE GATE ClOSES
AUTOMATICAllY TO PREVENT THE BACK FLOW.
~ o A) SEAT (FRAMES)
A SEAT FRAME lS A ONE PieCE CASTING .THE SEAnNG FACE IS
~ ~ l
crt
CAST AND MACHINED AT AH ANGLE OFF VERTICA.l so THAT THE
HINGED COVER HAS A HORIZONTAL FORCE COMPONENT TO
,\V&0 0;
CQMPlETEL Y SEAT THE GATE BY GRAVITY.
SfAINI.£SSH1NGEPlN
CORROSION RESISTANT SEATING FACES ARE PNEUMATlCAllY
IMPACTED INTO DOVETAIL GROCN'ES FOR HEAVY GATES.w-tEN
I
STAtllBS PIN WJ\$HER RUBBER SEATS ARE SPEClflEDTHE GtNDROP CROSS.sECTlON •
RUB8ER SEAl IS lOCKED INTO A DEEP OOVETAL GROOVE ON $EAT.
COV!R
S) FLAPS (COVER)
FLAPS ARE IRON CASTINGS OF REINFORCED FLAT PLATE DESIGN.
~I~ Oep~mofPubilc WcrU Md ~Ig~ REINFORCING RIBS BOni HORIZONTALANDVERTlCAlARE CAST
-- L...-
n
0Ifa of the s.cr.t.ry
1IIIUIUnillUmiOllUm
INTEGRAlLY ALONG Vt'Int BOSSES FOR THE HINGE. ~
C) DOUSLE-HINGE AC110N
o
FOR PROPER SEATING OF A FlAP GATE ,DOUBlE ACTlON IS
CIRCULAR FLAP GATE (TYPE II) NECESSARY .THE MAIN HINGE ACtION ON ANY FLAP GATE 1$ ABOtrT
WIN6R01230 ITS UPPER PIVOT POINTS. H FLEXlBlUty'lS REOUIRED AT THE
BonOM PIVOT POINTS TO Al SEATING OF THE RAP AGAINST lHE
:,IRCULAR S~~El FLAP GA~:E SEAT.
2.TO MAKE THE GATE MOHA SELF C
._
NINO IT SIiOlIW BE MOUNTED 3Oc:m
r-....... ro-.AIlOVE r~ ONT~THEGATe.
@ EB
PREPAIt£I) 8'f1 I Rm£W\D 9'" \ RtCOIlWDlD!NO _ ••.• / _ ~ J-1:'" ./'7 ",.,.~'WlY1' A.)/.. m NO. SHaT NO.
sHEET CONTENT'Sc
WUBUC Of THE PHILIPPINES
V } /-, 'biVr"/7' /.
8
L ./fJI/
DEPARTMEN, OF PUBUC WOR~
BUREAU OF DESIGN
AND HIGHWAYS ~ SECTION DETAILS OF F"BRICATED
RECTANGUlAR a CIIlOJLAR FlAP GATe
_ SItES OF FAB. R.ECTANGUlAR"CIRCULAR
TYPICAL STANDARD DRAWING
OF S1EEL FLAP GATE
-.LEON:..\no{
u~ ~B.~~r
l:IIRECT(mN
~IS
~ut«)ER8ECflETAR't
Rtl6Eu~A;I~~
SfCAETARV
.::,. ~
Q4lB',WAWl:PRJJECTaav.,IU).D.
WA,ER PROJECTSDMSION FlAP GAlt
• GENERAL NOlES
llONIFACO DIWE. l'ORT ~ IIWAA 7
1
I
lib..
.,1L... YO<'
~ SlOP i'"
A;- ~
TANDEMSHA"
TAi'\IDEMlJ'lS
J'P[
~!~
- !
! ir I
I
I m ,
,
~ t\=
i
j
r-SUOI!lHfW'I"
OPINf'()SIlD4
I I V-~=
t oI,¥ .
i
i , $T!'" --....
- .
i
j • +
.-
,
i ::;;;-
'-'
· r---
_______
1 _ __
1
i
_ i
i
··
.
I,-INVERT
i i -0
lL-
+
I
···
~A~OU
i
i . I
I ~
II i- II I
I L-~OMOfSLDE
,uu.0PfN ,....
FABRICATED SLIDE GATE
FABRICATED SLIDE GATE (NOT
(SELF-CONTAINED) WEIR GATE - DOWNWARD OPENING (SELF CONTAINED)
SELF-CONTAINED) FABRICATED HEAVY DUTY
STAINLESS STEEL SLIDE GATE
•.. FABRICATED SLIDE GATES

WIDTHImmJ CARBON STEB. a.
x GAL v ANlZED STAINLESS ALUMINUM ~~L'S RECOMMENOID
Bl.I:lE N'lCHORIOLT
I~:
...... .• AHlU FPAME
HOGHT Imml
X 300
AI-'
500
Bln-mt
250
Aln-mt
500
BI"'""
250
Almml
525
81_
200 250
In-mt
31.25
Lf~
250
S8T 8f'RD«}Q.lf' '~~: utMWPOLVIAER <100 950 31.25 250
J.se.tl.JlE1A11Bl: GUlOEElAR aoo x BOO 500 <100 500 400 525
615 325 725 31.25 2ea
450 X 450 e60 325 850 325
8'TUDIIKlLTW 8UPPORTR.ATAT 950 31.28 2W
400 015 400
l-PJrl./T&WA9l-£R I NCfQRII1T 450 X 800 650 <100 650
415 1175 31.25 250
450 X 750 650 475 650 475 615
25GIUJf ANQl.EFIWoIE aoo 325 B25 325 725 31.25 250
600 x 450 BOO 325
<100 ..., 31.25 350
~TEOP!' I aoo <100 aoo 400 B25
...• ~ 600 X BOO
600 X 150 800 475 aoo 47' 825 415
550
1115
1400
31.25
31.25
350
600
600 x 900 IllXl 550 IllXl 550 ll25
• TYPICAL SLIDE SECTION 600 X 1200

50XlllXl ...,
800 100
<100
aoo
950
100
400
825
915
315
100
400
415
1850
fI50
1175
31.25
31.25
31.25
750
eoo
eoo
750 X 150 950 415 950 475
750 X 900
750 X 10f;(l
950
950
550
825 ...,
950
950
550
825
100
915
315
915
550
825
100
1400
1625
1850
31.25
37.5
31.5
600
600
llOO
750X12lX1 950 100
400 950 31.25 BOO
xeoo 1100 <100 1100 400 1125
1125 415 1175 31.25 800
800 x 750 1100 415 1100 475
1100 550 1125 550 10Wa 31.25 600
900 X 900 1100 550
1100 825 1125 ll25 1625 37.5 BOO
900 X 1000 1100 B25
1100 100 1125 100 1850 37.5 750
900 X 1200 1100 100
850 2300 50
900 x
1500 1100 850 1100 850 1125
1215 415 1175 31.25 eoo
10s0X7eiO 1250 415 1250 475
1050X9CXl 1250 550 1250 550 1215 550 1400 31.25 eoo
1250 825 1275 B25 1825 31.5 150
1~X 1050 1250 825
1250 100 1275 1250 1850 37.5 150
1050 X 1200 1250 100
.1-0 850 12 7 50
TOP SECTION ~X7SlJ 1<100 415 1<100 47 1425 415 31.25
I 1200 X 9CXl 1<100

",.
1<100 [" 1.425
1425
550 ,
162S
31.25
31.5
.. ~._~
1200 X 1050
1200 X 1200
1200 X 1600
1<100
1<100
1<100
-"""
1<100
1<100
1<100 [~
1 '425
1425
1425
7M
850
1850
2300
2150
37.5
50
50
1200 x 1BOO
FlATHEADlUICHHE8CREW~8lIllE 1<100
.,.;~ ••••.... flUSH BOTT"""'"
1~X1326
1<100
1550 '''''''
n5 , 1550 n5 1515 n5 2076
,
37.5
31_
SECTION DETAIL ISOMETRIC ~I'~'
000
, 1100
.M
100
1100
, 25
2225
2225
550
1625
1
37.5
37.5
,X<> 1100 1100
850 1100 2225 2300 50
~';..~ OOl!SET X 500 1100
2225 2150 50
L 1100 1000 1100

~:'. '- "--ANCHO'l:IlOt.T 1825 37.5
~NrlGLEFPAME
,Mll :zooo :zooo 2025
:zooo 2025 1850 37.5
1800 X 1200 :zooo 100
:zooo 2025 2300 50
:zooo
11 ill' 1800X 1500
1800 X 1800 :zooo -,,..,, :zooo 2025 2150 50/
FLUSH - BOTTOM SECTION ....--... -- /'
REPU8LIC OF THE PHl..lPPINES

5HE£T CONTEMTSI Sl«ETTITU:
•..••..
DAm '''''T1lRI
--1(••./
om/:wm. sr. \
\ I } /2.. "A ~
~ ~
L·
AI'I'MMIl sr. ;.,.
,/,/T/
~ ~"
8
TEODOAOM. c::EMlE
TYPICAL STANDARD DRAWING OF , _LEO~ARD6 L~ ~E B,POTMTE ~ IS Ella r?s1~lsoN
BUREAU OF DESIGN DETAILS OF FABRICATED
SUDE GATE FABRICATED SUDE GATE L.b<l---;(f CI+Ef~"",""","".ll.D. --.;;::7DRECT6R"'.~~._. ,,,,,"" """"""
WATERPROJECTSOMSION
ItONlFAClO I:RM. PORTNEAIIWU.
CH"'"' /
I· "
Republic of the Philippines .

BUREAU OF DESIGN,WATER PROJECTS DMSION
• Bonifacio Drive, Port Area, Manila
STANDARD DETAILS OF PILE HURDLES
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
_ ••"' ••,w•••••••••
H,,_
CfIIoe of the sectary
m 1IIIIIIIIIallllilO
WIN6R01231
o SECTION A-A
o SECTION s-Il
NOTES
t.AU.PI.£IllWLeeAT1.EMT2Il'.II-.1N0lAAEml.
z. otlJ,.Il0UI-.w.a.1E tn" •• OWET£ANlHMUfSAH;lWASHIRS.
"UtIG1H.L~tUO.U8WU ItNtEIEFlOI taTO ,SPeRC£Nft#1HIWDlttaf'JHIllMl'l
QltOWtlnUNQfTO£lafD tCllIol.
4. TCflClIlHl.ES.wJ.Bf."TI.lA$TU.I«NE.1M.rf(JIWl(JtCA:ONR'l'
•• TIlt ••••••
lIlCllONMCUIJJ3FC;M:flIB..llItErPI.Etul:lLElttW.1IlEIA5EDONTHE IlE$lJ,.T r:E"1l£fIION
IrNLYBlINC)CAI.Ctl»Dlti.
o FRONT ElEVATION o SECTION C - C
o ..
TIMBER PILE HURDLES
..... ~
SHIET NO.
RfPU8UC OF THE PHIUf'PlNES SH'" mu.
BUREAU OF DESIGN -DETAIL OF TIMBER PILE HURDLES STANDARD PILE HURDLES
• WATER PROJECTS DlVtSl()l
1lOItFH:lClDRM.PC«rMfA,1IUHIA
I limn 010lT WfNtrB" WASHaS
A N
o DETAllOFSAWAUt,lrAmNG
7SX2.50Y~10ll'ItSfQUlVI\I.fNT}
I50XllXlY.AKMjOll'IT1EQlW\1A.l.OO)WAl..E
Illrrwrl01Ot.T lllUSHfS AND TWIGS
WlTMNlII'S&WASIifRS
III 1111
II II 1111
I III
1111 II II 1111
1111 II ••
1111 IIII
III II II
II II II. II II
1111 III II II
:: :: :: :: :: ::
II
II
II
II
.....1:
1111
1111
I' II
'"
11.1:
1111
II II
II ••
II II
&10..1.8
1111
II ••
IIII
1111
lil:
~
1 o CROSS SECTION
o FRONT ELEVATION
o-.: STEEL SHEET PILE HURDLES

.... [)@p8rtrn1ntof Publlc W0tk8 .net H~hMya
OffIce cI the SltcrebIry
.
1IIHIIImlmDlIIIIII"~
WIN6R01231
• REPUaLCOF THE Pt-tUPPlNES SHlEr CONTENTs, IMIlT 110.
BUREAU OF DESIGN -DETAIL OF STEEL SHEET
STANDARO PILE HURDLES
• WATERPROJECTSDiVISION PILE HURDLES
ICHFAClO mM.1'C«T.wA.MAHlA
•
BUREAU OF DESIGN,WATER PROJECTS DIVISION
STANDARD BIO - ENGINEERING FOR SLOPE PROTECTION APPLICATION r".
a. COCONET, INTERLOCKING BLOCKS WITH VETIVER GRASS
b. COCONET WITH VETIVER GRASS
c. COCONET, COCO LOGS I FASCINE WITH VETIVER GRASS
RECOt.lIolENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED BY:
_cl""bl~_ond_
otrIc:8oftheSe::reblry
1111111111111111111111.
WIN6R01232
BIO- ENGINEERING FOR RIVER BANK SLOPE PROTECTION APPLICATION
(COCONET, INTERLOCKING BLOCKS WITH VETIVER GRASS)
VETIVER GRASS
VETIVER GRASS
DESIGN FLOOD LEVEL (DEL) I

___.__. . . .. ....sz.JM~!M~_'!gx.l'~B!~tlG!'.Q.E!,QQ~~~_l'!F;f\..L . . . -------
VETIVER GRASS
REINFORCED CONCRETE ANCHOR

0.14 M. -12l, 1.0 M. LENGTH
NYLON ROPE, 0.Q1 M.
6) TYPICAL CROSS SECTION

SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.

2. VETiVER GRASS HEDGEROW SHALL BE PLANTED ON THE SLOPES AT 0.10 M. TO
NYLON ROPE,
0.15 M. PLANT INTERVAL AND THE ROW DISTANCE SHALL BE 1.0 M -4.0 M. APART.
0,10MII INTERLOCKING BL.OCKS 3. INTERLOCKING BLOCKS CAN BE USED WITH NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE TO
HEADSIZE BO\.IlDERS
HElGHT =r O.34M. PROTECT AGAINST SOIL EROSION.
WIDTH • 0.30111.
THICKNESS' 0.114 II. WATER GRASS 4. COCONET 700 IS USUALLY USED FOR RIVER BANK PROTECTION. IT CAN ALSO BE
WEIGHT - 221<GS.
VE1TVER GRASS
USED FOR INTERMITTENT HIGH VELOCITY AND HIGH WATER VOLUME DURING
NON-WOVEN HEAVY RAINS.
GEOTEXTllE INTERLOCKING 5. COCONET SHALL BE LAID LOOSELY. NOT STRETCHED ON THE GROUND. DIRECT
8LOCKS
CONCRETE ANCHOR CONTACT WITH THE SOIL SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES.
DIAMETER. 0 ' 0.14 M. 8AMBOO PEGS 6. BACKFILL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN AND SHALL
LENGH1"-1.0 M. 0.03 M. ' 0.04 M. WIDTH,
0.26 M. - 0.30 M. LENGTH
CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF EMBANKMENT.'
3.0 PCSISQ.II. 7. BAMBOO PEGS SHALL BE USED TO ANCHOR THE NETS INTO THE GROUND. USE 3
PCS OF BAMBOO PEGS PER SQUARE METER.
REINFORCEMENT BAR.
NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE 8. WATER GRASS ARE PLANTED AT EACH HOLE OF THE INTERLOCKING BLOCKS .
DIAMETER. 0-16 MM
REINFORCED CONCRETE
SUBMERGED UNDER NORMAL WATER LEVEL.
ANCHOR 9. INTERLOCKING BLOCKS ARE USUALLY USED IN STREAM BANKS WITH VELOCITIES
WHICH MAY EXCEED 3.0 MlSEC.
G) ~:'E~FORCED CONCRETE ANCHO:s:

G)~AIL ~S:
10. HEAD SIZE BOULDERS ARE PLACED AT THE TOI= nl= TI-ll= 11\IT1=1l1~l(iNr::
DepIlrtrent d
~
Public Works p
ci the SecnM'l'
RI n~l(!,:
HlgtMwP
1IIIIIUHIIWnURIIDlilA
.W1N6R01232
RECOMWEND! NG APPROV.A1.:
_ .••,.• d.
PREPAREO BY: D"TE: SIGNATURE
SHEET CONTENTS: SHE£T TITLE:
REPUBU: OF THE PHIUPf'INES
8
DEStOtt CA~<tOOQJE
DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS AND HIGHWA YS ~ CROSS 8ecT1ON
81c)' ENGINEERING FOR RIVER IlA/'I<
Sl.OPE PROTECTlON APPlICATION
REJNFORCEO CONCREm ANCHOR
BUREAU OF DESIGN (COODNET. INTERlOCKING BLOCKS
0fIAWIt ~~
DITAIL A, DETAIL B
WATERPROJECTSDIVISION Willi vrnVER GRASS) CHECI<m twrrJtI~W.LACRlZ,Jt .
I . !lOtIF1aO OfIYE.POfrrIRAIriWll.A
GENI!RAL NOTES
..
BIO- ENGINEERING FOR RIVER BANK SLOPE PROTECTION APPLICATION
(COCONET WITH VETIVER GRASS)
EXISTING PAVEMENT I SIDEWALK
VEllVER GRASS
HEDGEROW, ROW
DISTANCE AT
1.0 METER
VAA LE
DESIGN FLOOD LEVEL (DFL) /

I
a.3OM
..,OM
NORMAL WATER LEVEL BASE STRUCTURESSUCH AS; GABION, STONE

MASONRY, CONCRETE RETAININGWALL, SHEET
PILES, ETC.
ELEVA liON
SCALE: NTS:
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.

2. VETIVER GRASS HEDGEROW SHALL BE PlANTED ON THE SLOPES AT 0.10 M. TOO.15 M.
PLANT INTERVAL AND THE ROW DISTANCE SHALL BE 0.30 M. APART UP TO THE DFL/MEFL
AND 1.0 M. - 4.0 M. APART ON SLOPES ABOVE THE DFUMEFL.
3. COCONET 700 IS USUALLY USED FOR RIVER BANK PROTECTION. IT CAN ALSO BE USED
VETIVER GRASS HEDGEROW
VETI\>ER GRASS I-EDGEROW FOR INTERMITTENT HIGH VELOCITY AND HIGH WATER VOLUME DURING HEAVY RAINS.
4. FOR CUT SECTION MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS 7.0 METERS WITH A SLOPE OF LESS THAN OR EQUAL
NOTE:
TO 1:1 OR 45 DEGREES.
COCONET 700
VETIVER GRASS PLANTING DlSTAACE 5. FOR EMBANKMENTIFILL SECTION MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS 3.0 METERS WITH A SLOPE OF LESS
@ 0.30 METER PLANTlNG INTERVAl.
AN) 0.30 METER ROW DISTANCE LP TO THAN OR EQUAL TO 1.5:1.
1HE DESIGN FLOOD LEVEL (DFL) I 6. COCONET SHALL BE LAID LOOSELY, NOT STRETCHED ON THE GRoUND. DIRECT CONTACT
BAMBOO PEGS MAXIMUM EXPERIENCED FLOOD LEVEL
0.03 M. - 0.04 M. 'MOTH, (MEFL) WITH THE SOIL SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES.
0.25 M. - 0.30 M. LENGTH 7. BACKFILL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN AND SHALL CONFORM TO
3.0 PeS/SO.M.
THE REQUIREMENTS OF EMBANKMENT.
8. BAMBOO PEGS SHALL BE USED TO ANCHOR THE NETS INTO THE GROUND. USE 3.0 PCS OF
BAMBOO PEGS PER SQUARE METER.
9. MUST HAVE AT LEAST 0.025 M (ONE INCH) OF SOIL FOR PLANTS TO GROW . ./ •
DETAIL A 10. USE BASE STRUCTURES SUCH AS; GABION, STONE MASONRY, CONCR~ETAINING
SCALE: NTS: WALL, ETC. OoP-J:,.P\J:~:::"~HIg-
IIMUIIHII~IIIIIBllllml
WIN6R01232
,/ '
511£[T TlTL.E: PREPARED BY; CATE.: RtCOYMENDINGAPPROVAL: APPROVEDBY SET NO. SHEET NO.
SHttT CONTENTS:
8
REPUBLIC OF THE PHIUPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWA'IS BIO- ENGINEERING FOR RIVER BANK
~ SECT10N OETAIL Of WAVE DEfLECTOR
SLOPE PROTECTION APPLICATION
BUREAU OF DESIGN • DETAIL OF DRAINAGE DITCH
• TYPICAL secnON
W~TERPROJECTS DMSION _ DETAIL Of ANCHORAGE TO ARMOUR ROCK
(COCONET WITH VETIVER GRASS)
810- ENGINEERING FOR RIVER BANK SLOPE PROTECTION APPLICATION
• I ~.
(COCONET, COCOLOGS I FASCINE WITH VETIVER GRASS)
VETlVER GRASS
HEDGEROW, ROW
DISTANCE AT
1.0 METER
VM
NORMAL WATER LEVEL

BASE STRUCTURES SUCH AS; GABION, STONE
MASONRY. CONCRETE RETAINING WAll, SHEET
PilES, ETC.
ELEVA liON
SCALE: NTS:
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION GENERAL NOTES:
SCALE: NOT TO SCALE
1. All DIMENSIONS ME IN METERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
2. VEnVER GRASS HEOGEROWSHALl BE PlANTED ON THE SI..OPESAT 0.10 M. TO 0.1~ M. PLANT INTERVAL ANDnE ROW DlSTANCE SHALl. BE
0.30 M. APART UP TO THE DFuMEFL AND 1.0 M. - •. 0 M. APAAT ON SLOPES ABOVE THE DFUMEFL
3. COCONET 700 IS USUALlY USED FOR RIVER BANK PROTECTION. IT CAN ALSO BE USED FOR INTERMITTENT HIGH VELOCITY AND HIGH WATER
VOLUME DURING HEAVY RAINS•
•. FOR CUT SECTION MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS 7.0 METERS, SLOPE IS 1:1.
e. FOR EMBANKMENTIFILL SECTION MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS 3.0 METERS, SLOPE IS 1.e:l.
e. COCONET SHALL BE LAID LOOSELY, NOT STRETCHED ON THE GROUNO. DIRECT CONTACT'MTH THE SOlL SHAlL BE MAINTAINED AT All
VEllVER GRASS HEDGEROW TIMES..
7. BACKFILL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ITEM 104· EMBANKMENT.
NYlON ROPE, 0.010 M."
VETiVER GRASS HEOGEROW 8. BAMBOO PEGS SHALL BE USED TO ANCHOR THE NETS INTO THE GROUND. USE 3 PCS OF BAMBOO PEGS PER SQUARE METER
LIVE STAKE 9. COCOLOGSIFASCINES SHALL BE INSTALLED IF THERE IS NO EXISTING VERTiCAL AND HORIZONTAL DRAIN. COCOLOGSIFASClNES SHALL BE
o.oe M. " • 0.1 ~ M. " DIAMETER. INSTALLED AT THE SlOPE AT EVERY 8.0 •••.SPACING PLANTED'MTHVEnVER GRASS.
0.60 M.• 1.00 M. LENGTH NOTE: 10. LNE STAKES SHALL BE USED TO ANCHOR THE COCOLOGSIFASCINE TO THE GRDlJN)AND ADO TO THE STABILITY OF THE SLOFE.IT SHALl.
COCO LOG
VETIVER GRASS PLANTING DISTANCE
BE PlACED ON BOTH UPHIL1.AND ~ILL SIDES OF THE LOGS AND MUST BE SPACED AT 1.0 METERAPARTOep-'''' PublicWe'"ond HIg-
11. NYLON ROPES ARE USED TO TIE THE LOGS TO THE LIVE STAKES TO ADO STABILITY•• OfI1oe"''''_
COCONET 700 00.30 METER PLANTING INTERVAL
AND 0.30 •••ETERROWDISTANCEUP TO 12 USE BASE STRUCTURES SUCH AS; GASION. STONE MASONlY. CONCRETE RETAINING WALL, ETC. 1111 DID 1111111111111111111
BAMBOO PEGS
0.03 M.• 0.04 M. WIDTH,
THE DESIGN FLOOD LEVEL (OFL) I
MAXIMUM EXPERIENCED FLOOD LEVEL
WIN6R01232
0.25 M.• 0.30 M. LENGTH (MEFL) STEEPNESS VERTICAL DIBTANCE HORIZONTAL
3.0 PCSISQ.M. COCONET COCOLOG TYPE OF SLOPE VEGETATION
OF SLOPE OF COCOLDGS INTERVAl.
3: 1 400 100 8.0 METERS EMBANKMENT VETlVER GRASS 0.1SM •. OM
2: 1 4DO '00 8.0 METERS CUT GRASS COVER DEPENDS OF DESIRED DENSITY
1.5: 1 4DO 200 8.0 METERS
1:1 700 200 8.0 METERS
DETAIL B o.e: 1 900 200 •. 0 METERS
G):'~AIL~: SCAlE: NTS:
SHEET COfUENfS: sttEET Tm.£: PRtPAfW) BY: CATEI

REPUBLC OFTHE PHILf'pINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS AND HIGHWA YS SIG- ENGINEERING FOR RIVER BANK
· SECTlON DETAIL Of WAVE OEFlfCTOR
SLOPE PROTECTION APPUCAnoN
BUREAU OF DESIGN • DETAIl Of OAAINAGEOITCH
• WATERPROJECTSDIVISION • rmCAI. SEmON (COCONET. COCOLOGS I FASCINE WIDi
• DETA1L OF ANCHORAGE TO ARMOUR ROCK
BONIfACIO ORI\IE. f'()ff," MfA MalA
VETlVER GRASS)
GENERAL NOTES:
1. Clio•• ' 'A,' (FOR PILE CAPl AIfO CLASS 'C. (FOR REINFORCED CONCRETe: I'ti..()
CONCRETE SHAU. H.\VE MINIMUM 8TR£NGT~S OF:IO.70 MPa.
2. Al.lA.INF~G6A.RS8tW.l.COHFORMTOA5TMM1:uAS1~.USEf.-l""",",
QMO£40,Iy- 27eM~ FORBAASWIlli ORLESS THAN12"'Ill ~R.1'lNO
3.
•.....".
USE "4INIMUMllO. 'Y-
ADO o.!KllO oro

414 UP_, FOA ~8WiTHORGREATER
OIA.TClMACEOUS B~ [CEl..rTE OR n£
T'tW'4111
lll<EJ AS AH
•••••
AQ~C: PCIt 8AG orCE~. u&E W,,~ JET IF NECESSARY\Pi

RIVERSIDE ORMNG PUs.
TOP ELEVATION
. ~~
4. TlitH. P"Il.U "-"E DESlI3NlIP
111UO KIlOoN!.WTON-t.teTl'ItS PElil. Iol!TER CW W~ FaA: 8M., 705M. ",.,
• M. "'1.If! M&PfCTNSLY.
WITM A REStSTtfG M)t.E.NT 01'11880,11310 .
II ,. MW~ n:Nf.TflATIONallOW O1.t.NHl!.L BeD TO U .c.Ol11(..'.Io2M. He
J\
5.11 Ill. !tOA 8M., 7.!$M.""'" IN. PUS ~SPECT1'IO..Y.
•• S. CONQIltITa
TOll't\OCUCIi
VIlIIlATOR Sl'lNJ. Ii. 1.1810 IN THE CASTING Of' t1iESE PLU.
A OE"IS&. N«J t1lQH C~IS/IIE S~TH CCHCFtfTE.
• TH& .••••SUMED STR£SSU AM. fOR CONCAE'll: COIdPREssaoN:
·!
I lIM POUNOIPERSQUAAEINCI'I AHO FOR STEEL '" TCH5lO«;
I ~M.L 11,000 I"OUfClI P£R aOUAAE tot
~ 10 mm" BARS SPACED AT 300mm
I .'l;lI' BOTHWAYS
1. D1MeHSlOH&.AMi'" Mi.ft.KS Wl.E5I O1l-£RWlSE SPeCFlED.
a. FIGUMS SHAU. GOVERN OVER QCA4.U) Olf,EtorSO'tS IN CASE OF
12 mm" STIRRUPS TO PASS THRU OlSClIW'ANClC9.
I
·
i. IT 9riOULD IE NOTED TttA T THE. RElI'.f!ORCEllEtfT8 OF THE RMRSIDE. N'€J
HANDLING HOLES OF PILES (ONE I,.AH)tJOE OF TH£ PllES,Ir,Q NOT THE lAMIE,EXTREI.E CARE SHOll.08£
STIRRUP PER PILE) l):lfI,O&lO IN DRIVING THe PI-I1&. EtACI'l SlOE ry. THE PILE GMT SKOl.t.D 16
MAAAf£Q "W' ••~ THe w~TEMIOEN""l.·Il'OR THE 1...AN0UlE '" THfCAK
- 12 mm" LONGITUDINAL BARS ",m

HeAR THE.BUTT END. ~ II1OUI.O 8E ATT,t.CH£O TO Tl1E FORMS.
SPACED AS SHOWN
REINFORCED CONCRETE PILE
LENGTH OF MAIN REINFORCEMENT
ELEVATION OF R.C. PILES LENGTtl

...• CF SIZE OF BARS
foHDfClI IIMMDI
VI
(m)
VI
(11'1)
\Is
(11'1)
\I.
(m)
\1,
1m)
y.
(·1
C)ERECTION DIAGRAM 8-.OCM. 20llYllll 121T'••.•0 ~.n 1.82 l.a1 5.92 5.117
c:rlLE CAP DETAIL '."

'.K •• 0>
SECTION A· A
NOTES:
1. FOR '.10M . .AND 1.62.1,1 ~S. USE III'MJ PAlRS a: MAIN REINFORCING 8AA&.
- 2. FOR t. 16101, PUS. un • (sax) PAIRS OF MHN REW~ BAAS.
., Le~'flol CF &Ib
SIZE.
(Jf
NUMBER,
I,
AND SPACING
8,:
OF STIRRUPS
8s s.
.. , - "I
PLI
a.OOM.
~1.I"1Q'l1o
lQfnrrl0 10M 11 pili

.IO~
0 3.04M
IIQTloI
,.~
.m~
G
\~
1.23'" I5pelf
~~
~
0
"''«In;
0.1115 311Cl
~U
0
-
\' '/, .;; -I
1~M. ,~Z 10M 'l/lCIO
,10M
!.OM 2$pcI0
~~
1.315M 21PD10
~_
0.2515 3lQCD
U~
.OON, 10"11Me 1.0101 11* 0 C1021d IlpCI 0 t.)eM 17j101 G: 0.82101 31lQ •
ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION

St,
--1 St
STIRRUP BAR
•10~
BENDING SCHEDULE
~~ ~~ ~M
R. C. PILES SHOWING REINFORCING BARS

G DETAIL OF STIRRUPS
llitlOllo< OF
I"It.l
o.ocM-
llU Of
1"1IlfU>t
10rl'llt'll21
(c:m)
25.1
I b
(~",)
12
(em)
2U
G
(01"
d
11
•
(c:ml
.,
,
10l'l
2D 11 10 130' 122' 1.0' 1.&2'
v, v, v, v• v, v.
• .ooM. 1Cmm" )R 1. n.1I :to 51 2! 19 11 101' 123' 131' U1'
• k k
( RtV RSIDE)
DATA ON THE TYPICAL CROSS· SECTION
LEHOTH or i;llO$S"C1"~ I, II, I, b1 II III II. ell Co2 Co, f f,

i-- I PIlI ~ •• ~_'I (om) {Cl"l (e.nl (cml (UIII ICl'II (om) (00'!'i1 lcm) tCF.I1 (om) (CI'"l
1.00114. JC).., • 12 " II US U fl.' U U 3.0 6.0 •. ~
1.$)M. ".50 10 II 12 11 U •.5 1.6 8.0 u '.0 U U

\.
( LANOSIDE)
\ 1'--/1/ \ TOP
•.ooM
.• 2.&.1
OATA
1.)
ON STEEL
Ie I'
SHOE
12 U
PLATE
s.o 1.5 1A '.0 4.0 H 0.'
i-!-
lLNOTI1a • b Cl f • I II " -. m 'f! P III f
FRONT PU (em) (4Il') (Cl1lII (~l (crnllc;tnl 10tll) (C>fl) (om) (C'l'Il (lI'rl) (0In) (~l (O"IlJ
REAR
SECTION A-A
U
SIDE I.ooM. I 10 Z2 • U 6 I nQ '7 3e 32 II 12 U
DETAIL OF STeEL SHOE PLATE (3mm THICK) 1.50M. 11 13 n 10 •.6 • II s..o 1R -'0 so 22 I. :1.0
REPueuc Of THE PHIlIPPINES

NlPAMIt WI
_~ Ih1&WII
r-......
1'/, \
I
__
-- ~/'u.
....
,.00'''' t2 H 28 10' 8.c fI
-II'>
12 .lJ.6 20 •••
~
42 24
NO.
~..-G
••• NO.
8
Ol;!'OItt.lMTI~tRUZ.'ll
DEPARtMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
BUREAU OF DESIGN
_ R,C. PIL.fS SHOWING REINFORCING
- SECTION DETAILS
_ DETAIL or: STEfl SHoe PLAT!
eARS
STANDARD REINFORCED
SHEET PILE
CONCRETE
""""', •. (:EON ~o{ L1NGA;-
OltEf.WAT£fl;PAO.'fCllIXVAt.O.D.
D.A!lTfe. PC ANITE
o.
WATER PROJECTS DIVISION
, -. _ SPECIFICATION a. GENEFtAl NOTES CHEtllEi>. 'J4JIe1iWlOA.CNt.OTAI
/
L.".n~aHOl..I!· J2rMlll L~TaO 0 l$O!'IIn'
!'ROM 0Nt ENe
~
I
10 mm 1/1 BARS SPACED AT 3DOmm
BOTHWA YS
12 mm 1/1 STIRRUPS TO PASS THRU
HANDLING HOLES OF PILES (ONE
STIRRUP PER PilEI
I 12 mm 1/1 LONGITUDINAL
SPACED AS SHOWN
BARS
sreEL SHEET PilE
U-TYPE STEEL SHEET PILES
PILE CAP DETAIL
(Should Indicate the n:)

l. Length (m)
Wl Weight (kg/m)
Sx, Section MOdulus (cm'/m)
fy. grade of steel adopted
GENERAL NOTES :
1. CLASS "A" CONCRETE SHALL BE USED WITH A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH OF 20.70 MPa.
2. ALL REINFORCING BARS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM GRADE OF 40 (fy = 276 MPa).
3. ALLOWABLE STRESS FOR STEEL SHEET PILE SHALL BE 1800 kg/cm'
Z-TYPE STEEL SHEET PILES 4. THE CENTER OF LIFTING HOLE SHALL BE LOCATED AT DISTANCE OF 150mm
FROM END OF EACH PILE, DIAMETER OF LIFTING HOLES SHALL BE 32mm.
5. ONE MAN BOULDERS (300-400mm DIA.) SHALL BE USED FOR THE BOULDER
NEAR THE TOE OF THE FILL. ALL VOIDS BElWEEN BOULDERS SHALL BE
LEGEND: FILLED WITH SAND AND GRAVEL AND SUFFICIENTLY WATERED TO SECURE
COMPACTION.
d = WEB THICKNESS L = FLANGE THICKNESS 6. DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
f = NOMINAL t, = THICKNESS 7. FIGURES SHALL GOVERN OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS IN CASE OF
b = WIDTH w = NOMINAL WIDTH DISCREPANCIES.
h = DEPTH
••••••••• 1'11
RtfUBUC or THE PHllI1'riN£S """' l11U>
DEPARTMENTOF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS oe!lGttl.W{!Ilfl.\~CIlUl.1t
• TYpes OF STEfl SHeer PILE TYPES OF STANDARD DETAILS OF
BUREAU OF DESIGN • DETAJl Of PILE CAP STEEL SHEET PILE FOR
OAAWlt.JA.H~":'''Jc,~
- GENERAL ~on·s •• U- TYPE STEEL SHEET PILES
WATERPROJECTSOMSION
b. Z- TYPE STEEL SHEET PILES MCKm Ol"l
STANDARD
EARTHDIKE/LEVEE
GENERAL NOTES
I. DESIGN CRITERIA AND SPECIFICATIONS m. MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

,. OPWH DESIGN GUIDELINES, CRIlERIA a STANDARDS (DGC5), 2015 EDITION ,. EMBANKMENT
2. OPWH STANDARD 5Pl!C1FICATlONS, VOLUME 2, 2013 EDITION EMBANKMENt SHALL CONTAIN NO MUCK. PEAT, SOD, ROOTS OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATTER.
EMBANKMENT OF EARTH MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN HORIZONTAL LAYllRS NOT EXCEEDING
D. DESIGN CONDmONS 20Gmm LOOSC IoEASUREMENT AND SHALL BE COMPACTED AS SPECIFIED BeFORE THE NEXT LAYER IS
PlACED. THE MATERIALS PLACED IN ALl EMBANKMENT LAYERS AND THE MATERIAL SCARIFIED TO
,. HEIGHT AND CRESTYoUllH OF DIKE THE DESlGNIlTED DEPTH BEL.O'IVSUBGRADE IN CUT SEC1IIONS SHALL BE COMPACTED UNTIL A
I) THE HEIGHT OF OIKE 15 DETERMINED FROM THE ll!'$1GN FlOOD LEVEL ELEVATION PLUS AN UNFORM DENSITY OF NOT LESS THAN 9ll MASS PERCENT OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY IS
ADDITlotW. FREEBOARD ALI.OWANCE DEPENDING ON THE DESIGN DISCHARGE AS SHOWN IN THE ATTAINED AT A MOISTURE CONTENT tlETERMlNED BY THE ENGINEER TOIBE SUITABLE FOR SUCH
FOLLOWING TA8l.E: DENSITY.
2. AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE

llE5IGN IFl.OOD DISCHARGE Q (m"feec) FREEBOARD (m)
THE AGGREGATE SHALL CONSIST OFiHAAo, DURABLE PARTICLES OR FRAGMENTS OF STONE OR
LESS THAN 200 0.8 GRAVEL AND SAND OR OTHER FINE MiNERAl PARTICLES FREE FROM VEGETABLE MATTER AND
200 LESS THAN 500 0.8 LUMPS OR BALLS OF ClAY AND OF SUCH NATURE THAT IT CAN BE COMPACTED READILY TO FORM A
500 AND LESS THAN 2,000 1.0 FIRM, STABlE LAYER.
2,000 AND LESS THAN 8,000 1.2 WI-IERE THE REQUIRED THICKNESS IS l50mm OR LESS, THE MATERIAL MIllY BE SPREAD AND
5,000 AND LESS THAN 10,000 1.5 COMPACTED IN ONE LAYER. WI-IERE THE REQUIRED THICKNESS IS MORE THAN 15Omm, THE
10,000 AND OIlER 2.0 AGGREGATE SUBEll\SE SHALL BE SPREAD AND COMPACTED IN 'I'M) OR MORE LAYERS OF
APPROXIMATELY EQUAL THICKNESS, ,AND THE MAXIMUM COMPACTED THICKNESS OF ANY LAYER
b) THE TOPICREST WIDTH OF THE DIKE SHALL BE BASED ON THE DESIGN FLOOD DISCHARGE AND SHALL SHALL NOT EXCEED l5Omm. ALl·SUBSEQUENT LAYERS SHALL BE SPREAD AND COMPACTED IN A
NOT BE LESS THAN VALUES GIVEN IN THE FOLLOWING TABLE: SIMILAR MANNER
DESIGNIFl.OOO DISCHARGE Q (m'/IeC) CREST WIDTH (m)

LESS THAN 500 3
500 LESS THAN 2,000 4
2,0lIO AND LESS THAN 5,000 8
8,0lIO AND LESS THAN 10,000 8
10,000 AND OVER 7
2. SIDE SlOPE (v:Hl

I) 1:2 FOR EMBANKMENT < 8.Om IN HEIGHT (LOW EMBANKMENT)
b) 1:3 FOR EMBANKMENT> 8.Om IN HEIGHT (HICilHEMB.UIKMENT)
c) 1:. FOR EMBANKMENT CONSISTING OF SAND AND SHALL BE PROTECTED BY PROVIDING A TOTAL
COVER OF 300mm THICK OF A GOOD SOIL AND SODDING
3. BERM
I) RIVER SIDE: FOR HEIGHT> Mm, PROVIDE ElERMAT EVERY 3.Om TO 8.Om WITH A WIDTH OF 1.Om (MIN.)
b) LAND SlOE; FOR HEIGHT> 4.Om, PROVIDE BERM AT EVERY 2.Om TO 3.Om WITH A WIDTH OF tOm (MIN.)
4. HYDRAUUCOESIGI\lDATA
I) DRAINAGE AREA, (DA) • _ Ion'
b) DISCHARGE, (Q) • ~m'!slIc
c) VELOCITY,M =
_mlsee
&
REPUaJCOF THE PHILF'P1_
DEPAR1MENT OF P\JIlJC WORKS NfO tfIGHWI\Y$
BUREAU OF DESIGN
$EET nTLE:
--
......
-J
TEODOROM. CERALDI
-
"-
~
I
7--.....
(\
lo..
-.........tr-v ,,~
""
APPI\O\/&l>.
~- -- .THO. SHT. NO.
.......,
~--
NO
~~
-.-:itl"fJ
I STANOAROEARTHIlIKEII..EIIES GENERALNOTES
WATERPRO.lECIlI DMI10II
GNIII.::.=..•••. r / ~~
~FACIODItlW.POftT/IIIIIi1,.~ i'~'P'~ •..
.~
I
i
I
TOP WI TH (W)
Q.5Om
RIVER SIDE LAND SIDE
DESIGN TOP OF DJKE , 1 .15m THICK AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE
_______ ~. l .---...1: _
-----~~~~;;;~--~------~~1~~-------
~ BERM H
~ EMBANIKMENT
95% COMPACTION (MIN.)
NOTE:
REQUlRI;D DESIGN ANAlYSES (HYDROLOGY. HYDRAULIC, SCOUR, SEITLEMENT,
SEEPAGE, SLOPE STABILITY AND OVERALL STABILITY ANAlYSES) SIitAlL Bil CONDUCTED.
TYPICAL SECTION OF EARTHDIKE/LEVEE

SCALE: 1:511l mts.
8:
SHfETTITlE; SHEET CONTENTS
REPUBUCOF THE PHIUPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC VtIORKS AND HIG1IIWI\YS
BUREAU OF DESIGN 51ANDARD EARTHDIKEIl.EVEE TYPICAL SECTION
WATER PROJECTS IlM8ION s.
-----
GI
__ ot_
BOHIFACIO DRIVE. PORT AREA. IotANlLA
...
....

STANDARD DRAINAGE
CULVERT WITH FLAP GATE
GENERAL NOTES
2. FLAP GATES SHAlL HAVE ONE (1) STANDARD MATERIAL COMBINATION AS LISTED IN THE!FOLLOWING TABLE:
I. DESIGN CRITERIA AND SPECIFICATIONS
1. DP'NH DESIGN GUIDELINES. CRITERIA & STANDARDS (DGCS), VOLUME 3, 2015 EDITION
DESCRIPTION STANDARD MATERIAL REFERENCE STANDARD
2. DPWH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, VOlUME 2, 2013 EOrTtON
ASTM A126· STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR

SEAT AND COVER CAST IRON, CLASS B GRAY IRON CASTINGS FOR VALVES, FlANGES,
II. DESIGN CONDITIONS AND PIPE FITTINGS
1. BACKFlOW CONTROL STRUCTURES OUTLET flOW CONTROLS INCLUDE STRUCTURES SUCH AS TIDAL FlAPS. FLOOD GATES AND DUCK
BILLED VALVES. THESE STRUCTURES CONTROL THE BACKFLOW OF WATER FROM THE RECEfVlNG WATER BODy INTO EITHER THE CULVERT ASTM 898 - STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR
OR PIPE. THEY MAY BE INCORPORATED FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS, .INCLUDING: SEATING FACES SILICON BRONZE, AlLOY 651
COPPER SILICON ALLOY ROO, BAR AND SHAPES
8. TO PREVENT nDAL BACKFLOW INTO A CULVERT OR PIPE NElWORK
b. TO PREVENT FLOODWATERS FROM A RIVER OR CREEK FROM BACKWATERING THROUGH A PIPE NETWORK OR CULVERT, PARTlCUlARl Y PIVOT LUGS ASTM A536 - STANDARD SPECIFICATION FoR
DUCTLE IRON, GRADE ~
DUCTILE IRON CASTINGS
UNDER A LEVEE OR DIKE . LiNKS
c. TO PROVIDE WAl'ER QUAliTY CONTROLS BETWEEN T'lNO AREAS ASTM B5B4 - STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR
BUSHINGS BRONZE, ALLOY 932 COPPER ALLOY SAND CASTINGS FOR GENERAL
APPLICATION
2. THESE STRUCTURES INTRODuCe ADDITIONAL HEAD LOSSES. REFERENCE SHOULD BE MADE TO TliE APPROPRIATE MANUFACTURER
GUIDELINES. MAINTENANCE OF THESE STRUCTURES IS ALSO CRITICAl FOR THEIR PERFORMANCE
ASTM F593· STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR
STAINLESS STEEL, ALLOY GROUP 2, STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS HEX CAP SCREWS, AND
FASTENERS
01. MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS TYPE 316
STUDS
1. THE FLAP GATE SHALl BE-OBTAINED FROM AN APPROVED MANUFACTURER AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT FULL DRAWINGS AND
DETAilS OF THE PROPOSECFLAP GATE TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAl AT LEAST 28 DAYS BEFORE COMMENCING INSTALLATION OF ANY
FLAP GATE. 3. FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC (FRP) SHAlL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FOLLO'lNING ASTM STANDARDS·
THE Fl.AP GATESANO FRAMES SHAlL HAVE THE FOlLOWING FEATURES: OESCRIPT10N
DESIGNATION
8. DUAL HINGE ARMS, EACH WITH DUAL PIVOT POINTS.
AS'" D638 STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR TENSILE PROPERTIES OF PLASTICS
b STOPS TO PREVENT TtiE FlAP FROM OVERTURNING.
e. DISTANCE BETWEEN HINGE ARMS APPROXIMATELY eQUAL TO CLEAR OPENING IJ\/WTH. STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR TENSILE PROPERTIES OF POL YMERMATRIX COMPOSITE
ASTM O3039M
d. FIFTY TO SevENTY CHLORQPRENE SEALS OF OUROMETER HARDNESS. MATERIAlS
e. STAINLESS STEEl HINGE PINS IN DOUBLE SHEAR.

STANDARD TEST METHODS fOR FL.£XURAl PROPERTIES OF UNREItEORCED AND
f. FRAME AND COVER. EITHER AN UlTRAVIOlET STABilIZED FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC (FRP) OR AlUMINUM ALLOY 5083, AS ASlM 0790
REINFORCED PLASTICS AND ELEC~ICAl..INSULA1lNG MAlCRIALS
APPROPRIATE TO THE FLAP GATE BODY MATERIAL.
AS'" D695 STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR COMPRESSIVE PROPERTIES OF RJGID PlASTICS
THE FLAP GATE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAilS SHOWN IN THE FOLLOWING TABlE EXCEPT OTHERVVlSE INDICATED IN THE
PlANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
ASTM 0570 STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR WATER ABSORPTION OF PLASTICS
ASTM 01435 STANDARD PRACTICE FOR OUTDOOR VllEATHERING OF PlASTICS
LOCATION MATERIAl SHAPE SIZE
FRP CIRCULAR 4. ALUMINUM ALLOY 5083

300mm "".
750mm die. AlUMINUM ALLOV 5083 USED IN FlAP GATES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM B209M, STANDARD SPECIFtCATlON FOR ALUMINUM JlwND
DRAINAGE OUTLErS FRP CIRCULAR
ALUMINlJM.ALLOY SHEET AND PlATE
FRP CIRCULAR 900mm die.
ALUMINUM RECTANGUlAR 2000mm x 2000mm
SLUICE STRUCTURE 5 INSTALlATION OF FlAP GATES
ALUMINuM RECTANGULAR 1700mm X 1700mm THE GATE SHALl BE ANCHOREO TO THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE END WALL OR TO niE SLUICE STRUCTURE WALL WITH STAINLESS
STEEL ANCHOR BOLTS.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT THE ANCHOR HOLES ARE ACCURAtEL V LOCATED AND SHALL CHECK THE HOLE SPAC~G
BY "DRY FmING"THE GATE FRAME BEFORE ATTEMPTING TO MOUNT THE GATE BODY ON THE WALL.
w-lERE A FLAP GATE IS TO BE INSTALlED FOR A CIRCULAR CULVERT PIPE, THE GATE SHAlL BE SIZED TO ALLOW ATTACHMENT OF
THE GATE FRAME TO THE CULVERT END WALL VoMHOUT THE ANCHORING BOlTS DAMAGING THE PIPE CULVERT WALL
8HEET~: SHEET CONTENTS

REPUBUCOF THE PHIUPPINfS
DEP'BU'RNTEAUUOFDESIGNYS STANDARD DRAINAGE CULVERT

GENERAL NOTES
WATER PROJECTS DIV1SIOII WITH FLAP GATE
• BONIFACIO 0R1YE. PORT AREA. 1ilANl.A
SEEDETAIL"A"
- ---c; - - - -r -.----1r- - -. - - -, '. --, - -.---;-

- ---;-- ..
•• 4 "•
.. " .. . ~
.
'
, ,
•. .• /-~.------,
" I I '. PWOT ADJUSTING
I I NUTS
I I
.'
PIPE CULVERT
LO'NER ADJUSTING
", MECHANISM
SEAT
", • A"
DETAILS OF ADJUSTABLE
"
TOP PIVOT AND LINK ASSEMBL ¥
'- ~ - ~- ~ - ~ - ~ -- -'~ -'- - ~ - -- NOT TO
OPENING SIZE DIAMETER = 910mm
DIMENSION (mm.) PIVOT RADIUS

OPENING SIZE
SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW OIA(mm.)

A B C
(nm.)
NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE 91. 1170 584 700 1156.00

1067 '348 873 ll26 1359
1219 1511 758 959 1588
1372
152A
1683
1854
•••
927
1010
1168
1708
1930
1878 2032 1016 127. 2108
'829 2197 '099 1378 2281l
'98' 2375' 1187 1480 2484
2'34 2540' 1270 '58' 2548
"98 2706; '353 1584 2825
TYPICAL DETAILS OF PIPE CULVERT WITH FLAP GATE 2438

2743
28n
3175;
'438
'588
1584
'908
2978
3296
SCALE AS SHOWN
SHEET mLE: SHEET CONTENTS APPROVED:
STANDARD DRAINAGE CULVERT TYPICAL DETAILS OF PIPE CULVERT

VvlTH FLAP GATE VvlTH FLAP GATE GI
PIVOT ADJUSTING
NUTS
MOUNTING
HOLES
'.
ADJUSTABLE
PlVOr,LUG
LJNKARM
PIN BUStlING
LOV¥ER ADJUSTING
MECHANISM
BOX CULVERT
DETAILS OF ADJUSTABLE
@ @ @ @ TOP PIVOT AND LINK ASSEMBLY
NOT TO SCAlE
COVER
SEAT ' .
..
OIMENSIOl'II (mm.) PIVOT RADIUS
OPENING (mm.) (1m>.)
1000x1000
A
,300
•
625
C
812.50 1331.25
125OX1250 ,800 800 993.15 1668.75
SIDE VIEW FRONT VIEW 1500X1250 1750 725 943.75 1543.75

1893.75
,-
15OOX1500 ,750 875 1143.75
NOT TO SCALE
NOT TO SCALE 1500X1000 65. 818.75 1337.50
1250)(1200 2050 725 943.75 1543.15
1800)(1500 2050 875 11043.75 1893.75
l8OOX1BOO 2050 1025 1368.75 2262.50
215OX16OO 2350 875 1150.00 1893.75
2350 1175 1558.25 2600.00 .
2100X2100
24OOXt5OQ 1700 900 1150.00 1900.00
2400X2100 2700 1200 '562.50 2600.00
TYPICAL DETAILS OF BOX CULVERT WITH FLAP GATE

2<00><2400
275OX2750
3OOOX3OOO
,...
2700
3300
1350
'500
'500
1725.00
1900.00
2025.00
2925.00
>450.00
3725.00
AS SHOWN
SCALE
SHEETTlTL.E: SHEET CONTENTS

REPUBUC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWA.YS
BUREAU OF DESIGN STANDARD DRAINAGE CULVERT TYPICAL DETAILS OF BOX CULVERT

WATERPROJECTS
DM&ION WITH FLAP GATE WITH FLAP GATE
• 9OHlFACIOORIVE, PORT AREA, MANlLA
STANDARD PLAN OF 2M TO
6M GRAVITY WALL
GENERAL NOTES
I. DESIGN CRITERIA AND SPECIFICATIONS 3. MORTAR
1. DPWH DESIGN GUIDELINES, CRITERIA & STANDARDS (DGCS), 2015 EDITION THE MORTAR FOR THE MASONRY SHALL BE COMPOSED OF ONE PART OF PORTLAND
CEMENT AND TWO PARTS OF FINE AGGREGATE BY VOLUME AND SUFFICIENT WATER TO
2. DPWH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, VOLUME 2, 2013 EDITION MAKE THE MORTAR OF SUCH CONSISTENCY THAT IT CAN BE HANDLED EASILY AND SPREAD
WITH A TROWEL.
II. DESIGN CONDITIONS 4. PLACING OF STONES

WHEN THE MASONRY IS TO BE PLACED ON A PREPARED FOUNDATION BED, THE BED SHALL
1. SURCHARGE = 25 Um OR 24.47 kN/m'
BE FIRM AND NORMAL TO, OR IN STEPS NORMAL TO THE FACE OF THE WALL, AND SHALL
2. FREEBOARD = 600 mm (minimum) HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER BEFORE ANY STONE IS PLACED.
3. SOIL PROPERTIES: CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO PREVENT THE BUNCHING OF SMALL STONE OR STONES OF THE
a) UNIT WT. OF SOIL = 19 kN/m3 SAME SIZE. LARGE STONES SHALL BE USED IN THE CORNER.
b) ANGLE OF REPOSE = 30·
THE STONES SHALL BE LAID WITH THEIR LONGEST FACES HORIZONTAL IN FULL BEDS OF
MORTAR, AND THE JOINTS SHALL BE FLUSHED WITH MORTAR.
5. HYDRAULIC DESIGN DATA
a) DRAINAGE AREA, (DA) = __ km' THE EXPOSED FACES OF INDIVIDUAL STONES SHALL BE PARALLEL TO THE FACES OF THE
b) DISCHARGE, (Q) = __ m3/sec. WALLS IN WHICH THE STONES ARE SET.
c) VELOCITY, (V) = __ m/sec.
THE STONES SHALL BE HANDLED SO AS NOT TO JAR OR DISPLACE THE STONES ALREADY
SET. SUITABLE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR SETTING STONES LARGER THAN
THOSE THAT CAN BE HANDLED BY TWO MEN. THE ROLLING OR TURNING OF STONES ON THE
III. MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS
WALL WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. IF A STONE IS LOOSENED AFTER THE MORTAR HAS TAKEN
1. STONES INITIAL SET, IT SHALL BE REMOVED, THE MORTAR CLEANED OFF, AND THE STONE RELAID
WITH FRESH MORTAR.
a) THE STONES SHALL BE CLEAN, HARD AND DURABLE AND SHALL BE
SUBJECT TO THE ENGINEER'S APPROVAL. ADOBE STONE SHALL NOT BE 5. BED AND JOINTS
USED UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
BEDS FOR FACE STONES MAY VARY FROM 20 mm TO 50 mm IN THICKNESS. THEY SHALL NOT
EXTEND IN AN UNBROKEN LINE THROUGH MORE THAN 5 STONES JOINTS MAY VARY FROM 20
b) STONES SHALL HAVE A THICKNESS OF NOT LESS THAN 150 mm, AND
mm TO 50 mm IN THICKNESS. THEY SHALL NOT EXTEND IN UNBROKEN LINE THROUGH MORE
WIDTHS OF NOT LESS THAN ONE AND ONE-HALF TIMES THEIR
THAN TWO STONES. THEY MAY BE AT ANGLES WITH THE THE VERTICAL FROM O· TO 45·.
RESPECTIVE THICKNESS, AND LENGTHS OF NOT LESS THAN ONE AND
ONE-HALF TIMES THEIR RESPECTIVE WIDTHS. FACE STONE SHALL BOND AT LEAST 150 mm LONGITUDINALLY AND 50 mm VERTICALLY AT NO
PLACE SHALL CORNERS OF FOUR STONES BE ADJACENT AT EACH OTHER.
2. THE FOUNDATION BED SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO THE LINES AND GRADES AS

CROSS BEDS FOR VERTICAL FACED WALL SHALL BE LEVEL, AND FOR BATTERED WALLS MAY
SHOWN IN THE PLANS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER AND SHALL BE
VARY FROM LEVEL TO NORMAL TO THE BATTER LINE OF THE FACE OF THE WALL.
THOROUGHLY COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITEM 140.3.3 OF DPWH
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
6. ROADWAY AND SIDEWALK SURFACES MUST BE MADE TO CONFORM WITH THE NEW
STANDARD SECTION FOR ESTERO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT.
SHEET TITLE SHEET CONTENTS RECOMMENDING APPROV,6,l
@
R~PlJBLlC OF THE PHILIPPINES
OfPeTuRTEAU'OFDES1GNAYS STANDARD PLAN OF 2M TO 6M

GENERAL NOTES
W~TER PROJECTS ONISION GRAVITY WALL
1!lOto:F,lCfOOR!Vli.,PORT,AREA MJt.NlV,
r "---T-
I 1)0 I
--- -------.
I \.50
".
ll()rntnG I PiPfII,JoII..I'iG!l ••
-'~=-:~:'''"",,,-':M''''' - lOP C#" QR,I,VrTY WAll
![
~I
I
I I
~
2M GRAVITY WALL
(MAXIMUM UPLIFT PRESSURE AT TOE 21.55 kN/m2)
SCALE: 1:40M
i
i "\ i
~Ai~llltO,l,D81Of'I.~
.."= - ~ ....;;..
.. ,,"_';........;c:=
!:
I
!!
- ---I
!!
_.f.
NOTE:
3M GRAVITY WALL
THE REQUIRED DESIGN ANALYSES (HYDROLOGY.
HYDRAULIC. SCOUR. SLOPE STABILITY AND OVERALL i SCALE: 1:40M
/
STABILITY ANALYSES) SHALL BE CONDUCTED.
SHEET CONTENTS
REPUBLIC OF THE PH1LIPF'INfS
BUREAU OF DESIGN STANDARD PLAN OF 2M TO 6M

2M & 3M GRAVITY WALL
WATERPROJECTSDIVISION GRAVITY WALL
em"~ACIO CFfIVE" PORT APi A MANILA
~} .._.
S£ECE.l,o,llOfRAIU'H)8
~~C;IP·Pf2"lAlI.lNOl';
T~ C% OttAVII)' Wf'l'l
-1 '~Ef'OO.rr,RO
~r~.t. _~ __
I~
II~
8: - TO R[ DttEOCiE;;
- !-
"i :8
I jlNl,/CqrEl.tv I-
81
1 " I i I I
--I
I
J _ r~f7.i 1,',-1-,,7- i~
I
_ ~,l
4M GRAVITY WALL
\ (MAXIMUM UPLIFT PRESSURE AT TOE 41.18 kN/m2)
( j SCALE: 1:40M
_i,': 00__ 1 / ~f:[ t)f.l,AI' or fI"':lJ,..I~~ Sf! Or,. .••,' (~f 1141:.'1'1(,;& - \ l~IO~ _
I / I \ '
I" I '"
I I
,'- -
d I''(~-~
,· t~ I
.~i:n-!;
Ii
'OmmG'PIf't~"'·U,..;1"
ToPCfGPA\I1rv,..,o.u
J, ',v"''''GII'.I'tfVJU/'ol;;\~·
IOI"OF oJ/.l"'V;l~'~'l>ll ; I ,1 i~
i
-~ .;
I
-.
J .UjlIlOAA[1 ilftMlMI••
I
j i ,
I • r'- ,~ ,
1"-"1 I
I
I
I ••• ·'-"-"----"-1
,,~~
8 :
!
g
I
+- --I
~! i~
-I ---I
j~
I
I
I
~I
I ,!~
~!
0'
I
NOTE:
THE REQUIRED DESIGN ANALYSES (HYDROLOGY,
HYDRAULIC, SCOUR, SLOPE STABILITY AND OVERALL 5M GRAVITY WALL
STABILITY ANALYSES) SHALL BE CONDUCTED,
( " (MAXIMUM UPLIFT PRESSURE AT TOE 47.88 kN/m2)
, SCALE 140M
REPL!BIIC Of' THE PHIllPPINES

Of.FARrMENT OF PUBLIC
BUREAU OF DESIGN
~t(S AND HIGHWAYS
SHE( T TlTLl
STANDARD PLAN OF 2M TO 6M
~Hf~ CONTE"ITS
I~;;
WATER PROJECTS
flO"WA';It') eml"'!',
DI\II5ION
Pr\RT ,""REA. MANU."
GRAVITY WALL 4M & 5M GRAVITY WALL
1---
1r. .••.
r.>(cP
-+-
!O~I
i
-I
1/
f 1).[' (!Ilr,olU ~ fi"'.Jr.os ·
I
!
I
rl-r':t{ ~~-- Y...,<ll\(.'P'I<'( lfotIL1M:JS I
i rt~~-TOI'" GlI"vl1~ W"'-L !
I I
I ni£t50ARO 06m\Io"'" I
!-- t I
;
I
I
~:
I
"
8M GRAVITY WALL
;
/ SCALE: 1:40M
NOTE:
THE REQUIRED DESIGN ANALYSES (HYDROLOGY,
HYDRAULIC, SCOUR, SLOPE STABILITY AND OVERALL
STABILITY ANALYSES) SHALL BE CONDUCTED
flE;PU61IC OF THE. PrlILlPPINE!)

SHEf T Tl~U: _ j SHEEr CONTENTS r RECOMMENDING~PROVA,l i APPROVED
-j(;). -y~~L' -
D~j.>ARTMfN; OF pueuc WO~i'\S AND HIGHWAYS
BUREAU OF DESIGN STANDARD PLAN OF 2M TO 6M

WATER PROJECTS DIVISION GRAVITY WAll eM GRAVITY WALL
tlO~~;fA;';IO PRIIIC ''l)I.-r A!o<I.A ~"''''m'' I Akf AACO t./I DOROY
) ==.:~ I
L. 1.00
_
I
/ 50 mm G.!. PIPE
I /
-j TEE CONNECTOR
i 50 mm G,!. PIPE
50mm G.I PIPE RAILINGS
1
0 CROSS CONNECTOR
col
I TOP OF GRAVITY WALL
_J __
II')
N
STONE MASONRY
DETAIL OF RAILINGS
- i --,---,
) SCALE: 1:16M
',-
SH~!~: t_SH£r:r E9"TENTS 1 """~""-fD
@
REPU8UC OF THE PHILIPPINES
DEPARTMeNT OF PUBUC \\ORt<S AND HlGHWAYS ~._.-.
! BUREAU OF DESIGN STANDARD PLAN OF 2M TO 8M i DETAILS OF RAILINGS
1000MIli
i
WATER PROJECTS DMSlON
i!lOHlP'lOO ORM. POfIlT AAlA IMNILA
GRAVITY WALL I CH'Ci(I"-
~,\'?> ot>w\-\
Ik~4'!lb~
DEPARTMENTOF PUBUCWORKSAND HIGHWAYS
IOCJ~
Manila
NOV 0 3 2020
DEPARTMENT ORDER ) SUBJECT: Policy Directives on Transparency and
) Accountability for Procurement
NO. 105 )
)
Processes
Series of 2020 J: n\-\\ tote

Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 34 issued by President Rodrigo R. Duterte, dated 23
October 2020, wherein the principles of transparency and accountability in the public service
were reiterated, and in order to avoid irregularities in procurement process, transparency and
accountability in all government transactions, especially in procurement processes, shall be
observed.
I. Strict Compliance
A. All Implementing Offices (IOs) shall strictly comply with the relevant provisions on
transparency and accountability in the procurement process under Republic Act No.
9184 and its Revised Implementing Rules and Regulations (RIRR), the General
Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (GM FY 2020), Resolutions of the Government
Procurement Policy Board (GPPB)and other relevant laws, rules, and regulations.
II. Utilization of Official Website and Social Media Platforms for Transparency
A. IOs shall use and maintain their official websites and/or social media platforms as
sources of critical procurement information for the public. IOs that do not have existing
social media platforms are hereby directed to maintain one.
B. Pursuant to Section 93 of the GM FY 2020, all IOs shall ensure transparency in the
procurement of infrastructure projects by posting on their official websites and/or social
media platforms the following information:
a. Project name;
b. Approved budget for the contract;
c. Contract period;
d. Name of winning bidder and its official businessaddress;
e. Amount of contract awarded;
f. Date of award and acceptance; and
g. Implementing office/unitjdivision/bureau
C. For contracts involving projects with an approved budget of Fifty Million Pesos
(P50,000,000.00) and above, the foregoing post-award information shall be published
once in a newspaper of general circulation, in addition to posting the same on the
respective official websites and/or social media platforms.
Department Order No. ~ Series of 2020
Policy Directives on Transparency and Accountability for Procurement Processes
Page 2 of 2
D. 10s shall broadcast live stream, via their official websites and/or social media platform,
the procurement process, whenever the relevant committee/body is required to
convene/meet.
E. Observers duly authorized by the concerned Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) to
monitor the procurement proceedings on-line shall be allowed, provided that such
observers do not have any direct or indirect interest in the contract to be bidded out, as
prescribed in Section 13 of the RIRR.
F. 10s are hereby mandated to swiftly ensure that they have sufficient information
technology infrastructure so as to accordingly implement this policy right away.
III. Blacklisting
A. The Consolidated Blacklisting Report prepared and disseminated quarterly by the GPPB,
pursuant to the Uniform Guidelines for Blacklisting of Manufacturers, Suppliers,
Distributors, Contractors and Consultants, shall be posted on the official website and/or
social media platform of the 10, and shall indicate the number of times a person/entity
has been blacklisted, the type of offense/violation committed, the penalty imposed, and
the blacklisting agency concerned.
IV. Sanctions
A. Non-compliance with the foregoing directives shall be a ground for administrative

action(s) against the erring public official or employee, in accordance with civil service
laws, rules, and regulations, and other relevant laws.
V. Funding
A. The funding necessary for the implementation of the foregoing directives shall be
sourced from the regular appropriations.
For strict and immediate compliance.
~t~ --
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary
1.1 RGVS/ESR

1111111111111111111111111111111111111
WINOA04471
()I\" 1\3 \) V~~
Republic of the Philippines . \\.\\. ?fYW
Manila
~\\ "
'fmV t 1
DEPARTMENT ORDER) SUBJECT: Authorities and Areas of
) Responsibilities of DPWH Key Officials
NO. 10 8 ,~ ~
Series of 2020 Gi \\\\\\~
In the interest of the service and pursuant to the pertinent provisions of E.O. No. 124,
Series of 1987, and in view of the approval of the DPWH Rationalization Plan pursuant to
E.O. No. 366, Series of 2004, the authorities and responsibilities of DPWH Undersecretaries
and Assistant Secretaries are hereby amended as follows:
Senior Undersecretary Shall serve as Undersecretary for Regional

RAFAEL C. YABUT Operations in Luzon. As such, he shall have overall
supervision and control over the operations of all
Regional Offices in Luzon, except the National
Capital Region (NCR) and Region IV-B. He shall
likewise have overall supervision and control over all
infrastructure projects implemented by this
Department, but funded under the budget of various
line agencies, i.e. school buildings, health centers,
and farm-to-market roads in his area of assignment.
Undersecretary Shall serve as Undersecretary for Planning Service

MARIA CATALINA E. CABRAL (PS) and the Public-Private Partnership Service
(PPPS), and the Information Management Service
(IMS) .
Undersecretary Shall serve as Undersecretary for Support Services.

ARDELIZA R. MEDENILLA As such, she shall have overall supervision and
control over the Human Resource and Administrative
Service (HRAS), the Finance Service (FS), the
Procurement Service (PrS).
Undersecretary Shall serve as Undersecretary for Unified Project

EMIL K. SADAIN Management Office (UPMO). As such, he shall have
overall supervision and control over the five (5)
specialized clusters of the UPMO, namely, Flood
Control Management Cluster, Bridges Management
Cluster, Roads Management Cluster 1, Roads
Management Cluster 2, and Buildings & Special
Projects Management Cluster.
Authorities and Areas of Responsibilities of DPWH Key Officials
Page 2 of 4
He shall also serve as Alternate Representative and

Focal Person in the Inter-Agency Task Force Bangon
Marawi and manage implementation of various
infrastructure projects in the Bangsamoro
Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM).
Undersecretary Shall serve as Undersecretary for Regional

ROBERTO R. BERNARDO Operations in Visayas, NCR, and Region IV-B. As
such, he shall have overall supervision and control
over the operations of all Regional Offices in Visayas,
NCR,and Region IV-B. He shall likewise have overall
supervision and control over all infrastructure
projects implemented by this Department, but
funded under the budget of various line agencies,
i.e. school buildings, health centers, and farm-to-
market roads in his area of assignment.
Undersecretary Shall serve as Undersecretary for Legal Services and

Atty. EDUARDO S. RAMOS, JR. Office of the Secretary. As such, he shall have
overall supervision and control over the Legal Service
(LS). He shall assist the Secretary in matters
relating to his functions, duties, and responsibilities,
particularly, legal, personnel, and administrative
matters.
He shall also serve as the Focal Person of the

Internal Audit Service (IAS). As such, he shall have
the overall supervision over it and shall have the
authority to sign documents in relation to IAS
functions, as reviewed and recommended by
appropriate personnel.
He shall also have overall supervision and control

over the Stakeholders RelationsService (SRS).
Undersecretary Shall serve as Undersecretary for Regional

EUGENIO R. PIPO, JR. Operations in Mindanao. As such, he shall have
overall supervision and control over the operations of
all Regional Offices in Mindanao. He shall likewise
have overall supervision and control over all
infrastructure projects implemented by this
Department, but funded under the budget of various
line agencies, i.e. school buildings, health centers,
and farm-to-market roads in his area of assignment.
Undersecretary' Shall serve as Undersecretary for Technical Services.

D.O. No. K Series of 2020
Page 3 of 4
MAXIMO L. CARVAJAL As such, he shall have overall supervision and

control over all the Bureaus, namely, Bureau of
Construction, Bureau of Design, Bureau of
Equipment, Bureau of Maintenance, Bureau of
Quality & Safety, and Bureau of Research &
Standards.
Assistant Secretary Shall serve as Assistant Secretary for Regional

ANTONIO V. MOLANO, JR. Operations in Visayas, NCR, and Region IV-B. As
such, he shall assist the Undersecretary for Regional
Operations in Visayas, NCR,and Region IV-B.
Assistant Secretary Shall serve as Assistant Secretary for Support

MARICHU A. PALAFOX Services.As such, she shall assist the Undersecretary
for Support Services in the overall supervision and
control over the HRAS,the FS,and the PrS.
Assistant Secretary Shall serve as Assistant Secretary for Legal Services

Atty.MELJOHNI.VERZOSA and Special Concerns. As such, he shall assist the
Undersecretary for Legal Services in the overall
supervision and control of the Legal Service (LS), as
well as matters that the Secretary considers as
special concerns.
He shall also have control and supervision over the

Legislative Liaison Office (LLO) as well as the three
(3) Department Legislative Liaison Specialist (DLLS)
Positions and two (2) CTI Positions, which were
transferred to the Office of the Secretary by virtue of
Department Order No. 74, Seriesof 2019.
In addition, he shall have the authority to sign

Verification and Certification of Non-Forum Shopping
in relation to DPWH cases handled by the Office of
the Solicitor General (OSG) which are not
expropriation cases in nature, including the
necessary communications to the OSG related to
non-expropriation cases. He shall also have the
authority to sign Special Power of Attorney
authorizing the Solicitor General and/or any of his
duly authorized representative/s and/or any DPWH
officials or employees to represent DPWH in non-
expropriation cases, which shall include the filing of
appropriate complaints or pleadings in any court,
tribunal, quasi-judicial agency, or administrative
body.
D.O. No. M Series of 2020
Page4 of 4
This Order supersedes Department Order No. 17, Series of 2020, and all other issuances
inconsistent herewith, and shall take effect immediately .
.r/;":- •.-?.'
~~, .. ..., ~ ~V~ ~- _
MARK A. VILLAR
Secretary
Departrrent of Public Works and HlghWllys

1111/ " 111111111111111111111111111111

WI NOA04482

2020 DPWH Department Orders

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2020 DPWH Department Orders

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

P" t;.

Departrrent of Public Works and Highways

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES

II. AGGREGATES AND SOIL AGGREGATES

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES

III. HYDRAULIC CEMENT

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES

IV. BITUMINOUS MATERIALS

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES

VII. CONCRETE AND CEMENT PRODUCTS

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES

VIII. FERROUS AND NON-FERROUS METAL AND

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES

IX. MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS (MECHANICAL)

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES

XI. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES

XII. NON-DESTRUCTIVE TEST EQUIPMENT

XIII. CALIBRATION EQUIPMENT

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES

2. Calibration shall be conducted on a regular basis as indicated in the Certificate of Calibration

This Order shall take effect immediately.

UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV)/ DRONE

Brand and Model:

Attachments: o Photo of the Equipment

o Property Acknowledgement Receipt

District Engineer/Regional Director

To be filled up by the BOD:

Farm to Market Road

Minimum of 6.1m for two-lanes Minimum of 6.1m for two-lanes

Tourism and Farm to Market Roads

Per D.O. 112, s. 2019 This Amendment

Slope Protection As needed Requirement and selection of type as per

This Order shall take effect immediately.

Departrrent of Public Works and Highways

Page 1/3 of Annex "A"

Page 2/3 of Annex "A"

Page 3/3 of Annex "A"

1. 2019 Interim Revision for LRFD Seismic Design Specifications

This Order shall take effect immediately.

Department of Public Works and Highways

NO. 19 ) l Span Reinforced Concrete Deck

Set 1 - Single Span Flat Slab Bridge

3a ~ Requirements in the Preparation of

B. Conceptual Design Plan is prepared based on the recommended option/scheme from

1II1I111 III "11111111111111111II1I1I1

I. List of Drawings for Feasibility Study Engineering Plan (Highways)

o Location Plan and Vicinity Map

II. Technical Reports

o GeologicalAssessmentand GeotechnicalInvestigation Report

III. Checklist for Feasibility Study Engineering Plan (Highways)

Veritjt if the following are indicated:

B. Location Plan/Vicinity Map

Veritjt if the following are indicated:

C. Topographic Plan (To be incorporated in the design plan)

o Verify and check if the Consultant conducted surveys in accordancewith the

D. Typical Roadway Section

Veritjt if the following are indicated:

Checklist for Feasibility Study Engineering Plan (Highways)

o Road Right-of-Way limit.

E. Plan and Profile Plan