Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Email address…………paulette.tainsh@harcourts.co.nz……………………..
Hearing
I/we note that all submissions are public information and will be published and be accessible
to the public and media as part of the decision making process. If I/we believe there are
compelling reasons why my/our name and contact details and/or submission should be kept
confidential, I/we will contact Thames Coromandel District Council.
Under the Reserves Act 1977 camping on reserves is prohibited unless approved by the Minister,
provided for in a campground, or permitted within a reserve management plan.
The previous Thames Coromandel Freedom Camping Bylaw 2014 has been revoked and the District
Council has put out for submission a new proposed Freedom Camping Bylaw 2022. Under the
Freedom Camping Act 2011, a local authority may make a bylaw under the Act only if it is satisfied
that—
(a) the bylaw is necessary for one or more of the following purposes:
(i) to protect the area:
(ii) to protect the health and safety of people who may visit the area:
(iii) to protect access to the area; and
(b) the bylaw is the most appropriate and proportionate way of addressing the perceived
problem in relation to that area; and
(c) the bylaw is not inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.
The proposed new Freedom Camping Bylaw has considered the need or otherwise to protect a
specific site against the three purposes outlined in the Act. The assessment criteria used for
assessing specific sites are generally interpreted as follows when undertaking an assessment of a
site.
Protection of the health and safety of people who may visit the area
• Protection of visitors to an area from fire, crime or other direct threats (e.g. in areas in close
proximity to high fire risk areas such as the pine trees in the Endeavour Reserve or direct
treats such as flood or landslide risks)
• Protection of visitors to an area from hazards associated with traffic and traffic management
including access to and from a site (including emergency vehicles)
There are inconsistencies and omissions of important site information in the assessments of the
Cooks Beach Central and the Purangi Reserve areas at the sensitive coastal settlement of Cooks
Beach, compared with assessments of Marine Parade Reserve at the same sensitive Cooks Beach
coastal reserve and similar coastal areas in settlements in close proximity to Cooks Beach. This has
resulted in incorrect designation recommendations by Council for these two sites. The correct
assessment “scores” for the Cooks Beach Central and Purangi Reserve should be significantly higher
at a score of 9 minimum, giving a correct designation of “prohibited” for freedom camping at Cooks
Beach Central and Purangi Reserve.
TCDC’s Comprehensive Report: Options for the Control of Freedom Camping, dated 8.2.2022,
discusses the problems caused by freedom camping, including health issues and environmental
pollution caused by disposal of human waste and used toilet paper, littering, damage or destruction
of native flora and fauna or wahi tapu by poor camping practices or the scale of camping in an area,
excessive noise that is a nuisance to nearby residents, verbal or physical assaults of residents or
Police, theft or damage of private property, eg, water from outdoor taps, vegetables and fruit from
gardens, loss of visual amenity due to location or number of campers in an area, fire risk from poor
fire safety practices or non-compliance with fire restrictions, compromised access to, or impact on
use of, public areas, particularly parking places and traffic safety issues or hazards caused by poor or
inconsiderate parking.
The report states that data collected by Council in the period November 2017 to November 2019
showed the revoked bylaw was effective in addressing the problems described above. I/we submit
that the revoked by law was definitely not effective in addressing those problems and the proposed
new bylaw will be equally ineffective in protecting the area, the health and safety and the access at
these two proposed “restricted” freedom camping sites.
I/we support the inclusion of the Marine Parade Reserve as an area where freedom camping is
prohibited and seek a similar inclusion of Cooks Beach Central and Purangi Reserve, ie, the entire
reserve area at Cooks Beach, as an area where freedom camping is prohibited.
I/we submit that the following site information needs to be fully considered and taken into account
in order to provide adequate and appropriate protection of the Cooks Beach Central and the
Purangi Reserve areas through a correct “prohibited” designation:-
PURANGI RESERVE
Protection of the health and safety of people who may visit the area
• The beachfront area of this reserve and neighbouring Endeavour Reserve, have been
severely affected by coastal erosion and frequent storms which resulted in the loss of a toilet
facility during a storm in 1978.
• In 2019 the Cooks Cairn was moved approximately 50m to the east of its original location
after it was washed out during a storm in 2018.
• Coastal erosion has impacted the beachfront area and continues to threaten parts of the
reserve.
• The Cooks Beach Coastcare group continue to protect the erosion prone dunes with
weeding and planting programmes.
• The lighting of fires by campers in the vicinity of the beach reserve near scrub, bush or the
large pine tree plantation is a fire hazard. The local volunteer fire brigade responds to call
outs and put these fires out.
• Captain Cook Road and Oyster Drive experience very high traffic volumes and vehicular use
to the reserve, the boat ramp and the overflow parking areas and access for residents,
visitors and other users needs to be protected.
• The road is narrow, windy, and poorly formed and is an area where families and children
come, young children ride bikes in this area and vehicles are now parking back up and
around Captain Cook Road and Oyster Drive thus narrowing access even further.
• The addition of large motor homes, buses and towed caravans exacerbates the congestion
and consequent dangers to visitors and users of the reserve area, particularly for children.
• The narrow access roads and entrance ways to the proposed freedom camping sites are not
easily accessible for large motorcaravans, buses and cars towing caravans and exacerbate
congestion for other users of the reserve area.
• Access to either of the proposed freedom camping sites are narrow, single lanes used by
pedestrians, children, owners with dogs on leads, vehicles, overflow boat trailer vehicles
accessing the designated parking area and kayakers, etc, making their way on foot to the
estuary.
• Large motorhomes, buses and towed caravans impact on the safety of residents, visitors and
other users of the reserve.
• The local fire brigade practice on part of the reserve and have installed a water storage tank
here with need to be accessible.
• The reserve is extremely popular during the summer months and provides for a wide range
of activities including swimming, picnicking, cooking at the public barbecue facility, kayaking,
paddle boarding, boating and other forms of passive recreation.
• A large portion of the reserve is already designated as overflow parking area for vehicle and
boat trailer parking and there is the obvious potential for conflict between the overflow
parking vehicles and the freedom camping vehicles.
• The motorhomes, buses and caravans add to the congestion over the summer in particular,
because they stay for 2 days and 2 nights and don’t vacate during the day because it is a
designated “parking” area. They either park and stay for 2 days and 2 nights or they leave
before 9.00 a.m. and relocate to the prime beachfront Purangi Reserve spots under the pine
trees by the estuary. Their sheer size compounds the congestion and hinders access in the
beachfront reserve area experienced by recreational users and residents.
• The access road to the boat ramp is narrow and gets congested particularly over the summer
months and public holidays.
• Protection of access to an area for the service vehicles to clean and maintain the toilets and
collect rubbish is impacted by the increased congestion at the Purangi Reserve.
• Enforcement of the previous freedom camping bylaw was an ongoing issue with excessive
numbers of campervans regularly secreting themselves at various locations around Cooks
Beach, with no obvious, consistent action on the part of the enforcement officer to enforce.
However, in contrast, dog owners and boaties parking with trailers have had enforcement
regulations rigorously applied.
• Cooks Beach was among the very earliest known places of Maori occupation dating back as
far as the 14th or 15th centuries and is of great significant to Ngati Hei.
• Protection of this sensitive coastal environment is needed where there is the need for a
‘Coastcare’ programme which is functioning west of the boat launching facility and will, in
time, extend along the length of the Cooks Beach Reserve..
• The coastline is a dotterel breeding and nesting area which are vulnerable to disturbance on
the beach during its’ breeding season from September to February.
• There would be a loss of privacy for residents and home owners in the residential area
adjacent to the Central Reserve and significant disturbance from the noise of camping
activity and their arrival and departure.
• The outlook and views out towards the pristine beach and Mercury Bay would obviously be
impacted by the arrival of many motor homes and vehicles towing caravans seeking a
camping spot where only 4 sites are proposed. It is well documented that any designated
limit is not adhered to, and the number of campers would be well in excess of 4. This would
represent a very real loss of amenity for residents, property owners and visitors to the area.
• Rubbish dumping from these multiple campers would represent a health hazard to the many
recreational users who frequent the area and the children who play there.
• Freedom camping in this specific coastal location adds virtually no value to the local
residential and commercial areas. Freedom campers contribute very little to the local
business owners and restaurants, purchasing their necessities prior to their arrival.
• Cooks Beach is serviced by two private campgrounds, Cooks Beach Resort and Flaxmill Bay
which have 100 fixed sites and 36 fixed sites respectively. These businesses operate to the
highest standards and strict compliance requirements, contributing to the local community
and economy in numerous ways, including significant rates contributions and employment
of local businesses and people. Their Houses, Cottages, Cabins, Chalets and Event Centre
also bring visitors to the area who do contribute to the immediate local economy, visiting
restaurants etc.
• There has been a significant increase in the pressure on the capacity of the settlement of
Cooks Beach with the large growth in the number of new houses following several
subdivisions which have brought many more residents and visitors to the beach. The
recreational values and capacity of this area are already under pressure with the huge influx
of holiday makers and visitors. The recreational values of this area must be protected.
Protection of the health and safety of people who may visit the area
• The beachfront field/green zone is a day and night heli-landing site with an emergency
entrance to the reserve/green at the entrance of Marine Parade. This needs to be
protected.
• The local fire brigade practice on part of the reserve and, in the event of an emergency, will
need to have clear access to the emergency entrance to the field/green. This activity needs
to be protected.
• There is a children’s playground / swing area almost adjacent to the proposed restricted
freedom camping site. The proposal to locate a designated freedom camping site adjacent
to a public toilet and a children’s playground represents an obvious risk to the safety of, in
particular, children and other visitors to the area.
• Coastal erosion continues to threaten parts of the beach and to present a safety issue for
people who may visit the area, particularly during large storms.
• The lighting of fires by campers in the vicinity of the beach, particularly near the large pine
trees is a fire hazard. The local volunteer fire brigade responds to calls to put these fires
out.
• This is a high traffic area, vehicular and pedestrian, to the beach and to community events at
the park which would be adversely affected by the introduction of a designated freedom
camping site where large motorhomes, buses and towed caravans would impact on the
safety of residents, visitors, recreational users and other users of the area.
• The beachfront reserve is a day and night heli-landing site with an emergency entrance to
the reserve at the entrance of Marine Parade. This needs to be protected.
• Banks Street and Marine Parade experience very high traffic volumes and vehicular use to
the beach front, the sports field and family recreation area and community events held at
the sports field. A designated freedom camping site would impact on the existing
congestion and access to the area for residents and recreational users.
• The Central Reserve is extremely popular during the summer months and provides for a
wide range of activities, including swimming, picnicking, kayaking, paddleboarding, boating,
community events at the green and other forms of passive recreation. Access for these
activities need to be protected.
• This area already has very limited parking capacity and becomes very congested for
residents, visitors and recreational users. Therefore, designating 4 of those limited spaces
for freedom camping will negatively impact on access for these other users, particularly
given that inevitably there will be more than 4 freedom campers at any one time.
• Enforcement of the previous freedom camping by law was an ongoing issue with
excessive numbers of campervans regularly secreting themselves at various locations
around Cooks Beach, with no obvious, consistent action on the part of the
enforcement officer to enforce. However, in contrast, dog owners and boaties
parking with trailers have had enforcement regulations rigorously applied.
Additional Comments
It is to be anticipated that tourist and visitor numbers, including campervans, etc, will
continue to increase in the future. We consider that the greatest chance of a successful
outcome for the Mercury Bay area can be achieved by Council, with input from members of
the local community, if their planning includes a longer-term outlook of, say, 10-20 years by
seeking alternative solutions. Establishing 1 - 2 freedom camping sites, away from
residential areas, within 4-5 kms of the three main destinations in Mercury Bay South,
namely, Cooks Beach, Hahei and Hot Water would be a sensible, long term, course of action.
Discussions could also be had with, for example, Seeka to explore possibilities, and benefits,
of working with them to enable accommodation being made available for transient workers
in the kiwifruit season (March to June) alongside the freedom camping opportunities.
An alternative location for freedom camping could be established at the council owned land
at 50 Purangi Road, Whenuakite. The site was formerly used as the old dog dosing strip.
This 1.8ha parcel of land is a recreational reserve and Council could clear and level an area
to accommodate freedom camping sites whilst retaining the majority of the existing trees,
etc, for screening and privacy. (See Attachment D) This land is centrally located for all the
various attractions in the Mercury Bay Area, including, Cooks Beach, Hahei and Hot Water
Beach.
Judge Cooper, in her Decisions in the case of New Zealand Motor Caravan Association v
Thames Coromandel District Council (2016) noted that the position of the police in relation
to enforcing and Act of Parliament cannot be equated with a Council deciding not to enforce
a bylaw, nevertheless she considers it wrong in principle for a Council to both maintain a
bylaw and say it will not enforce it. This is because ‘citizens are entitled to regulate their
affairs in accordance with the law, and should not be dependent on enforcement policies
able to be changed without the formality and publicity attendant on the actual law making
process. This is a fundamental requirement of the rule of law’.
Attachment E is a letter from Council confirming that their operational position has been to
warn, rather than infringe self-contained vehicles parked outside the designated area….. etc.
Enforcement and consequent infringement has been an ongoing issue and, undeniably,
unless there is a 24 hour enforcement officer at Cooks Beach, the so called proposed
“restricted” designated freedom camping sites for 4 and 5 sites at Cooks Central and
Purangi Reserve respectively is impossible to enforce for the reasons identified earlier in the
submission.
For this reason, along with all the other reasons detailed above, and given the serious
impact of uncontrolled freedom camping in this sensitive coastal environment in the
residential settlement of Cooks Beach, I/we submit that freedom camping must be
designated as a “prohibited” activity.