DKT 88 Re Motion For FBI Referral

Case 1:22-cv-03409-ER Document 88 Filed 08/21/22 Page 1 of 54
Filed on 8/21/2022 08:12:13 PM

22cv3409 (SDNY) (51)
United States District Court
For the Southern District of New York
Ware v. USA, et al.
___________
Submitted by:
/s/ Ulysses T. Ware
The Office of Ulysses T. Ware
123 Linden Blvd.
Ste 9-L
Brooklyn, NY 11226
(718) 844-1260
utware007@gmail.com
Sunday, August 21, 2022
Petitioner, Ulysses T. Ware’s August 21, 2022, Emergency Petition to the District
Court (SDNY) to Refer to the Director of the FBI: NY Senator Charles Ellis Schumer,
Merrick B. Garland, Andre Damian Williams, Jr., Loan Sharking Criminal
Enterprise Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt), Edgardo Ramos, Laura Taylor-Swain, the
Atlanta, GA Bankruptcy Court, the State Bar of GA, and Edward T.M. Garland, et
al., jointly, an Illegal Association-in-Fact, regarding re: Jeremy Jones’ Missing,
Unaccounted for, and/or Concealed USSG 5k Perjury Contracts and Pleadings,
RICO Loan Sharking, Money Laundering, Conspiracy, and other Matters.1
1 18 USC 1519 and 18 USC 2071 cover and protect the U.S. Government’s judicial public records
from concealment and removal from the Bankruptcy Clerk’s and District Clerk’s possession,
control, and security. See also 18 USC 1961(6)(B) unlawful RICO debt collection activity regarding
the illegal debt collection proceedings in 02cv2219 (SDNY), 03-93031 (D. NV), 03-93031 (BC
NDGA), 04cr1224 (SDNY), 05cr1115 (SDNY), and 22cv3409 (SDNY).
See Fed. R. Crim P. Rule 55: Records.

“The clerk of the district court must keep records [Jeremy Jones’ alleged USSG 5k perjury
pleadings] of criminal proceedings in the form prescribed by the Director of the Administrative
Page 1 of 54
(51) re Jeremy Jones’ missing and concealed USSG 5k judicial public records.
Certificate of Service
The government was served with this pleading on 08.21.22 via Damian Williams at
damian.williams@usdoj.gov, Jun Xiang was served at jun.xiang@usdoj.gov, and USAG Merrick B.
Garland was served via DUSAG Jeffrey R. Ragsdale, Jeffrey.ragsdale@usdoj.gov on 08.21.2022.
Office of the United States Courts. The clerk must enter in the records every court order or
judgment and the date of entry.”
Page 2 of 54
Table of Contents
Opening Statement ....................................................................................................................................... 5
August 22, 2022, Petition to the District Court. .......................................................................................... 6
A. ................................................................................................................................................................... 8
THE QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW:............................................................................................... 8
I. .................................................................................................................................................................. 11
Petitioner’s purpose for submitting this Petition to the Court. .......................................................... 11
II. ................................................................................................................................................................. 12
A. 18 USC 1519 and 18 USC 2071 protect the purported USSG 5k Perjury Pleadings. ................. 12
B. The current 05cr1115 (SDNY) purported docket contained no entry regarding the alleged
Sept. 22, 2006, Rule 11 guilty plea of the person alleged to be defendant “Jeremy Jones.” ......... 15
C. Judge Ramos’ conduct is unprecedented, delusional, corrupt, and criminal Orwellian
“doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” judicial doctrine.......................................................... 18
D. Andre Damian Williams’ Conduct is unprecedented Orwellian “doublethink” prosecutorial
misconduct and Newspeak “blackwhite” prosecutorial doctrine and procedure. .......................... 19
1. PLEASE BE ADVISED AND TAKE NOTICE OF NEWSPEAK’s TITLE 18 USCO SECTION 1. ............ 21
E. USAG Merrick B. Garland’s conduct is unprecedented Orwellian “doublethink” Newspeak
“blackwhite” prosecutorial misconduct. ........................................................................................... 22
2. The USAO, and DOJ are currently concealing and willfully suppressing the alleged Sept. 22,
2006, Rule 11 Jeremy Jones Perjury Pleadings in 18 USC 401(3) criminal contempt of the Brady
Court Order, Dkt. 17, Ex. 3-1, and 3-2, infra. ..................................................................................... 23
F. The State Bar of Georgia’s Delusional Orwellian “Doublethink” Newspeak “blackwhite”
Conspiracy to Alter Physical Reality. ................................................................................................. 24
G. Dangerous and Delusional Orwellian “Doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” doctrine by
Mr. Ware’s Retained Lawyers, Edward T.M. Garland, et al.............................................................. 26
H. Delusional Orwellian Newspeak “Doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” doctrinal
Inconsistencies in the Proceedings. ................................................................................................... 29
I. Reliefs requested to address the numerous instances of criminal Orwellian “doublethink”
and Newspeak “blackwhite” judicial and prosecutorial doctrine committed in the sub judice
proceedings. ....................................................................................................................................... 34
Distribution List .......................................................................................................................................... 38
Exhibits ....................................................................................................................................................... 39
Exhibit 1: Alleged Dkt. 24, Sept. 2006 Rule 11 Transcript ..................................................................... 40
Exhibit 2: Kirton’s USSG 5k Letter to Pauley, J. ..................................................................................... 41
Page 3 of 54
Exhibit 3-1: 1115 Brady Court order (1) ................................................................................................. 42

Exhibit 3-2: 1115 Brady Court Order (2) ................................................................................................ 43
Exhibit 4-1: 12/08/12 (Dolinger Jones Letter) ....................................................................................... 44
Exhibit 4-2: Dkt 215:05cr1115 (Dolinger Jones Letter) ......................................................................... 45
Exhibit 5: State Bar of GA fabricated affidavit of personal service. ..................................................... 46
Exhibit 6: alleged 05cr1115 official docket does not reference Sept. 22, 2006, alleged Rule 11 plea by
Jeremy Jones. ......................................................................................................................................... 47
Exhibit 7: the Concealed SEC’s Brady Exculpatory Email. ..................................................................... 48
Exhibit 8: FINRA’s May 17, 2021, Certification of Unregistered Broker-Dealer Status for Alpha
Capital, AG (Anstalt). .............................................................................................................................. 49
Exhibit 9: Clerk’s demand for payment for access to Jones’ documents. ............................................ 50
Exhibit 10-1: Delusional Orwellian Doublethink by Edward Garland, et al. ........................................ 50
Exhibit 10-2: Delusional Orwellian Doublethink by Edward Garland, et al. ........................................ 52
Exhibit 11: 12/20/07 Voluntary Rule 41(a)(2) final judgment (02cv2219) (SDNY). ............................. 53
................................................................................................................................................................ 53
Page 4 of 54
Opening Statement
“It was the best of times, and the worst of times.”
“And Brutus and Cassius were honorable men.”
As Cicero stated in his opening statement to a session of the Roman Senate

hearing a criminal trial:
“Conscript fathers nothing is more sure, nothing is more certain, than that
these honorable and noble men here today will accept a bribe and be bought
than the course of the Tiber. That will never change … all we can hope for is
that they have the honor and restraint to only accept a little bribe and once
bought to stay bought … that is all we can hope for ….” (circa 1st century B.C.).
Page 5 of 54
August 22, 2022, Petition to the District Court.

The Office of Ulysses T. Ware
123 Linden Blvd.
Ste 9-L
Brooklyn, NY 11226
(718) 844-1260
utware007@gmail.com
Saturday, August 20, 2022
Via email to ChambersNYSDRamos@nysd.uscourts.gov

The Hon. Edgardo Ramos
U.S. District Court (SDNY)
500 Pearl St.
New York, NY 10007
Re: Ware v. United States, Merrick Garland,2 Edgardo,3 and Laura Taylor-Swain,
Case No. 22cv3409 (SDNY), 28 USC 2241(a) actual innocent habeas corpus
proceeding, (the “Petition”).
2See former circuit Judge Merrick B. Garland’s opinion in In re Sealed Case, 185 F.3d 887 (D.C.
Cir. 1999) (Held: Ordered the government to disclose cooperation agreement between trial
witness); cf., the irony and legal contradiction in that gov’t witness Jeremy Jones’ USSG 5k
cooperation agreements are presently being concealed and suppressed by Judge Garland’s
former law clerk, U.S. Attorney (SDNY) Andre Damian Williams, Jr., and by extension (now
prosecutor) USAG Merrick B. Garland). Very ironic. The classic case of incongruent duplicity:
Jabberwocky judicial and prosecutorial reasoning and logic is being applied in 04cr1224 (SDNY),
05cr1115 (SDNY), 22cv3409 (SDNY), 02cv2219 (SDNY), 03-93031 (BC NDGA), and 03-0831 (D. NV).
3Judge Edgardo Ramos was named in the Petition as an adverse party, a material witness, and
unindicted coconspirator, and pursuant to 28 USC 455(a), 455(b)(1-4), and In re Murchison,
Edgardo Ramos is judicially disqualified from all judicial participation in the 22cv3409
proceedings; yet Judge Ramos has adamantly for unexplained and irrational reasons i.e.,
Orwellian “doublethink” and Newspeak revisionist doctrine) applied Jabberwocky logic and
reasoning and recklessly refused to recuse himself and continues to obstruct and impede the
proceedings to conceal his crimes committed in 04cr1224 and 05cr1115.
Page 6 of 54
Government 05cr1115 (SDNY) “principal witness” Jeremy Jones’ missing and

concealed USSG 5k judicial public records subject to 18 USC 1519 and 18 USC 2071.
Judge Edgardo Ramos, please see the Question Presented, infra, regarding the request
for judicial relief this application addresses.4
4 Edgardo Ramos, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgardo_Ramos#cite_note-11, was nominated

in 2011 as a federal judge by New York Senator Charles E. Schumer. Thus, Ramos cannot be
considered unbiased, impartial, and disinterred regarding any issue that concerns Schumer and
his clients, and by extension USAG Garland, and U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, USAG Garland’s
former law clerk—that is, Schumer’s puppets and sycophants.
In 2021 Ramos came under ethical scrutiny for allegedly violating the Judicial Code of Conduct
by failing to disclose financial conflicts of interests in matters he presided over. In September
2021, the Wall Street Journal published an article reporting that more than 131 federal judges
had violated their ethical obligations by presiding over matters where they had a financial
interest. Ramos was prominently highlighted in the Wall Street Journal piece for presiding over
a lawsuit between Exxon Mobil and TIG Insurance Co. over a pollution dispute, while he owned
upwards of $50,000 of Exxon stock. Ramos ruled in favor of Exxon Mobil, ordering TIG Insurance
Co. to pay Exxon Mobil $28 million in damages as well as $8 million in interest.
Ramos again came under controversy in March 2022, when he [again] failed to disclose a
financial interest in a case he was presiding over. Investors had sued major banks,
including Barclays and HSBC, accusing them of rigging the foreign bond market. Ramos dismissed
the investors' complaint. It was later revealed that he held stock in one of the defendant banks.
He subsequently recused himself from the matter, which was taken over by Judge Valerie E.
Caproni; she reconsidered the dismissal of the investors' complaint against the banks and allowed
the case to proceed.
Ramos in May 2022, again came under unethical official scrutiny. Ulysses T. Ware filed a
complaint for judicial misconduct, In re Edgardo Ramos, 02-22-90049-jm (2d Cir. Court of
Appeals), that alleged Ramos is interested, actually biased, actually partial, and corruptly handled
his 2021 matter, Dkt. 251, and the 22cv3409 (SDNY) Habeas Proceedings, i.e., ipso facto as a
matter of law Ramos is required to recuse himself from the 22cv3409 (SDNY) Habeas
Proceedings.
Page 7 of 54
A.
THE QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW:
Whether the U.S. Attorney General, (the “USAG”), Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney
(SDNY), Andre Damian Williams, Jr.,5 and District Judge (SDNY) Edgardo Ramos6 are under the
corrupt influence, psychological domination, and financial dependence of Charles Ellis Schumer,
et al., to such an extent their independence, judgment, and discretion have been compromised,
controlled, and captured by New York, Senator Charles Ellis Schumer, et al.?7
5 Williams is the former law clerk of former circuit judge Merrick B. Garland; and investigators
have discovered that formerly Williams was employed at the same NYC law firm, Paul, Weiss, et
al. where Schumer’s brother, Robert B. Schumer, is a partner. It was also discovered that
Schumer’s purported “nominating committee” on which his brother Robert serves, was the body
that proposed Williams to be nominated as the U.S. Attorney (SDNY). The evidence suggests that
Williams was put in place by Schumer for a particularly nefarious and perfidious purpose.
Williams’ prosecutorial discretion and independence are questionable.
6Schumer in 2011 nominated Ramos to be a federal judge despite no prior judicial experience,
no prior law clerk experience, and no prior experience handling any major case. Thus, why did
Schumer believe that Ramos was competent and qualified to be a federal judge? There was no
objective evidence of competence, and now the bad fruit that was sowed from the bad seed is
being reaped on the public by Ramos’ unusual judicial incompetence.
7 Does Charles E. Schumer, et al., have compromising evidence on the USAG Merrick B. Garland
such that the USAG or his former law clerk, U.S. Attorney (SDNY) Andre Damian Williams, Jr. are
not independent, but under the control, management, and direction of Schumer, et al.? Note
that Schumer championed Garland for the Supreme Court, and Schumer arranged for Garland to
be appointed as USAG, and Schumer arranged for the nomination of USAG Garland’s former law
clerk, Andre Damian Williams, Jr, as his hand-picked U.S. Attorney (SDNY) to, perhaps, offer
prosecutorial protection to RICO loan-sharking criminal enterprise Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt),
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2019/comp24431.pdf.
What better to run a RICO criminal unlawful debt, loan sharking 18 USC 1961(6)(B) criminal
enterprise from within the DOJ: the criminal enterprise, Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt), would be
Page 8 of 54
For the reasoning and analysis explained below, Petitioner answers in the affirmative, Yes,
to the Question Presented: Garland, Williams, Ramos, and others are under the undue and
corrupt political influences of Charles Ellis Schumer, et al., and their independence, judgment,
and sound discretion have been compromised.
Regrettably, given the Looking Glass Jabberwocky8 events and the application of
Orwellian “doublethink”9 in a judicial context that have occurred in the Habeas Corpus and
absolutely immune to all prosecution. Which it appears to be despite being a confirmed

unregistered broker-dealer, see Dkt. 1-2, Ex. 7, (Ex. 8, infra).
8A reality in which nothing makes rational sense. What is up is down, one adds by subtracting;
one multiplies by dividing. Good is evil, and evil is good. To live is to die, to die is to live. Cf., with
George Orwell’s novel 1984 the concept of doublethink. The Orwellian concept of doublethink is
being applied in the RICO Unlawful Debt Collection Case in the federal courts in New York that
are under the control of the Jabberwocky, Charles Ellis Schumer.
E.g., Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt), a confirmed unregistered broker (see Ex. 8, infra), confirmed
RICO loan-sharking unlawful usury debt criminal enterprise is not prosecuted by the DOJ, the SEC,
or the USAO: Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt) is praised as a model successful business enterprise.
Doublethink at its finest: that what is bad is good, that which is good is bad. Orwellian
doublethink, 1984. The loyal Party members have bought the Jabberwocky’s (Big Brother’s)
doctrine in whole to the extent they think they will not be caught. Remember the Nuremberg
prosecutions: many thought they were part of a 1,000-year domination system, and many of
those went to the gallows. Beware that Fate is watching. The Abyss is awake.
9 The keyword here is “blackwhite.” Like so many Newspeak words, this word has two mutually
contradictory meanings. Applied to an opponent, it means the habit of impudently claiming
that black is white, in contradiction of the plain facts. Applied to a Party member, it means a
loyal willingness to say that black is white when Party discipline demands this. But it means also
the ability to believe that black is white, and more, to know that black is white, and to forget
that one has ever believed the contrary. This demands a continuous alteration of the past, made
possible by the system of thought which really embraces all the rest, and which is known in
Newspeak as doublethink. Doublethink is basically the power of holding two contradictory beliefs
in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.
Page 9 of 54
related proceedings, these pressing questions must be investigated and answered in an
independent and public judicial proceeding not conducted by a loyal Party member where
Orwellian doublethink judicial reasoning and analysis is not used and applied in the Southern
District of New Oceania (SDNO).
Page 10 of 54
I.
Petitioner’s purpose for submitting this Petition to the Court.
The Petitioner, Mr. Ware, petitions the Court regarding very troubling and disturbing
issues and matters in 22cv3409 (SDNY) and its related proceedings regarding:
1. the government’s “principal witness”10 Jeremy Jones, (“Jones”), who allegedly--
that is, the identity of the person who appeared to be Jeremy Jones on September
22, 2006, has not been verified or confirmed in court records, allegedly entered a
Rule 11 plea on September 22, 2006, in the magistrate court (SDNY) (Dolinger, J.)
to the superseding indictment (S1) in U.S. v. Ware, 05cr1115 (SDNY), (“1115”)
(Pauley, J.), (deceased);11 and allegedly received a USSG 5K letter from the
government for his perjurious debriefing, alleged Rule 11 plea, and knowing and
10Circuit Judge Kearse identified Jones as the “principal witness” for the government in the U.S.
v. Ware, 577 F.3d 442, 445 (2d Cir. 2009) opinion. (“The government’s principal witness [in
05cr1115] was [Jeremy] Jones [who testified for the government pursuant to an undisclosed and
covert USSG 5k cooperation perjury contract ….”]. (emphasis added). See Dkt 1-2, Ex. 29-2, Jones’
CJA lawyer, Marlon G. Kirton, April 30, 2008, letter to former District Judge Pauley (deceased)
confirming that Jones did in fact “receive a 5k letter from the government” (paraphrased). See
Ex. 2, infra. The location and entry of the alleged USSG 5k letter, Brady evidence, see In re Sealed
Case, 185 F.3d 887 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (Garland, J.) (held: Gov’t required to disclose as Brady evidence
cooperation agreements) has never been disclosed to the public or Mr. Ware, the Petitioner
herein
11See Ex. 1, purported but unauthenticated Dkt. 24, Jones’ alleged Rule 11 plea transcript, with
any record on the 05cr1115 docket, see Ex. 6, infra. If Jones actually (officially) entered a Rule 11
plea on Sept. 22, 2006, then why does the 05cr1115 docket, Ex. 6, not indicate the acceptance of
the Rule 11 plea? And why does the docket not list the entry of the Rule 11 plea contract, a
judicial public record?
Page 11 of 54
suborned by the government’s prosecutors perjurious trial testimony in 1115;12
and
2. yourself concerning your personal continued reckless refusal application of
Orwellian “doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” doctrine, to immediately
remove and recuse yourself from the 22cv3409 (SDNY) and related proceedings,
(the “Very Disturbing Questions”).13
II.
A. 18 USC 1519 and 18 USC 2071 protect the purported USSG 5k Perjury Pleadings.
Judge Ramos, Ex. 1, infra, Dkt 24, appears and purports to be a transcript of a person who
purported to be Jeremy Jones’14 alleged September 22, 2006, Rule 11 plea to S1. However, the
12 See Ex. 2 (Marlon Kirton’s letter dated April 30, 2008, to District Judge Pauley (deceased). Kirton
informed Judge Pauley that Jones had received a “5k letter” from the government for his known
and suborned perjured testimony in 1115).
13 Applying Orwellian “doublethink” to the facts—that is, Judge Ramos is named on the face of
the 22cv3409 Petition as an adverse party, Judge Ramos even though ipso facto judicially
disqualified by federal law, 28 USC 455(a), 455(b)(1-4), applies doublethink to mentally construct
a fantasy reality in which he is not judicially disqualified from participating in 22cv3409 (SDNY),
which is also believed and enforced by Loyal Party members in the SDNO.
14The identity of the person who allegedly appeared in the alleged illegally sealed and closed
magistrate court (SDNY) on September 22, 2006, has never been actually verified, confirmed, or
authenticated; and whether or not any lawful and legitimate judicial proceedings actually
occurred on September 22, 2006, in the magistrate court (SDNY) also have never actually been
verified, confirmed, or authenticated in any judicial proceeding. Thus, at this point in the Habeas
Proceedings anything alleged to have occurred on September 22, 2006, is lacking in credibility
and integrity until authenticated in adversarial open, public, and independent judicial
proceedings.
Page 12 of 54
actual docket in U.S. v. Ware, 05cr1115 (SDNY) did not contain an entry for Dkt. 24 until Mr.
Ware wrote to magistrate judge Dolinger on December 8, 2012,15 long after September 22, 2006,
and long after the 2007 trial in 1115 was completed. Mr. Ware inquired to Judge Dolinger
concerning the location and possession of the alleged Jones Rule 11 plea contract, the Jones Rule
11 plea transcript, and other Jones USSG 5k perjury documents, (the “Jones Perjury Pleadings”
or “Perjury Contracts”).16
Cf., with the State Bar of Georgia’s bogus and fraudulent claim, see Dkt. 1-2, Ex. 17-6, (attached
herein as Ex. 5, infra), that Mr. Ware was actually personally served at the BOP’s Brooklyn, NY,
MDC federal prison on [Monday], “January 15, 2007, at 1042 AM” when in fact according to court
records Mr. Ware was not in the MDC, but was trying the 1115 case before Judge Pauley on
January 15, 2007, at 10:42 AM.
Thus, it is understandable for one, and the courts, to be skeptical, critical, and require that all
purported identities and alleged “certified” documents, at a minimum, be conclusively verified
and authenticated in a proper judicial proceeding before they can be fully accepted and trusted
given the numerous factual and legal controversies surrounding the events in 1115, 04cr1224
(SDNY), 03-93031 (BC NDGA), i.e., see 1115, Dkt. 81, 82, 83, and 85, 03-0831 (D. NV), and other
pertinent matters related to this Habeas Proceeding. When one voluntarily goes down the rabbit
hole, one is trapped in Wonderland, and thus, trapped in Jabberwocky logic and reasoning which
has no place in the courts of the United States.
15 See Ex.4, infra, which judicial record does not appear on the 05cr1115 docket.
16 If in fact it was Jeremy Jones, which Petitioner believes it was not, who actually entered a Rule
11 plea to S1 on September 22, 2006—new information has come forth to question whether or
not it was “Jeremy Jones” who actually was the person who allegedly entered the alleged Rule
11 plea on September 22, 2006 -- that information was required to have been docketed
immediately on the 1115 docket thereafter, it was not, and produced to Mr. Ware as Brady
exculpatory and impeachment evidence, it was not, and also identified as Jencks Act material and
disclosed pursuant to the May 19, 2006, Dkt. 17, Brady court order, Tr. 5-10 (Pauley, J.), see Ex.
3, infra, it was not.
Thus, the current dilemma: on the one hand the government alleges that a person that purported
to be “Jeremy Jones” actually pleaded guilty to S1 on Sept. 22, 2006, see Ex. 1, infra; but on the
Page 13 of 54
Apparently, Judge Dolinger referred Mr. Ware’s 2012, Ex. 4-1, infra, letter,17 (the
“Dolinger Letter”), to Judge Pauley,18 who referred the letter to the District Clerk’s office. See
Ex. 9, infra (Clerk’s letter to Petitioner demanding payment to access documents).
Mr. Ware was contacted by the District Clerk and demanded payment to gain access to
judicial public records, 19required to have been freely disclosed pursuant to the Brady Court
Order, Ex. 3-1, infra, to what was claimed and alleged to be the September 22, 2006, Rule 11
transcript, Dkt. 24;20 and what was claimed to be a “certified” copy of the 05cr1115 docket now
containing entries for Dkt. 24, which previous versions of the 1115 docket supplied to Mr. Ware
contained no entries labeled Dkt. 24. 21
Judge Ramos, I am sure if you were eligible, which you are not, to adjudicate the Habeas
Proceedings that you will find this horrendous conduct most troubling, unethical, clearly illegal,
and violations of 18 USC 1519 and 18 USC 2071. What legal reason(s) could Judge Pauley have
other hand, there are no judicial public records of the required Rule 11 plea contract or USSG 5k
cooperation letter the person alleges to be Jeremy Jones entered into. See Dkt. 6, infra, 05cr1115
docket excerpt for Sept. 2006 (no record of the entry of Jones’ alleged Rule 11 plea). Accordingly,
18 USC 2071 was triggered and violated by the removal and theft of judicial public records.
17
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pzcmbV_wdKGon7m4pA6bdfmkRoDQIlNj/view?usp=sharing
18 See Ex. 4-2, infra, Dkt. 215:1115

19 See Ex. 9, infra.
20 See Ex. 1, infra.

21 See the Dolinger Letter of 2012, Dkt. 215:1115; cf., Ex. 4-1, infra, an excerpt of the Dolinger
letter.
Page 14 of 54
had (none) that motivated him to violate the Court’s May 19, 2006, Brady Court Order, Ex. 3-1,
and 3-2?
However, the Jones’ purported Rule 11 perjury contract, nor Jones’ USSG 5k letter were
ever provided to Mr. Ware by the Court or government in 2012; and to this day the USAO has
not complied with the Brady Court Order. Dkt. 17, and disclosed (ii) Jeremy Jones’ USSG 5K letter
(ii) Jeremy Jones’s alleged Rule 11 perjury contract, (the “Jones Perjury Contracts”), (iii) Jencks
Act debriefing statements or grand jury testimony, and (iv) other Brady materials.22
B. The current 05cr1115 (SDNY) purported docket contained no entry regarding the alleged
Sept. 22, 2006, Rule 11 guilty plea of the person alleged to be defendant “Jeremy Jones.”
22 Cf., Mr. Ware’s filings in 22cv3409 (SDNY) seeking the government’s disclosure of Brady
materials: Dkt. 75, 73, 68, 58, 51, 42, 38, 37, 33 (the SEC’s disclosure of Brady materials, cf., Dkt.
84 and 86), 29, and 27, (the “Brady Evidence Demands”). U.S. Attorney (SDNO) Damian Williams,
a Loyal Party member, has applied Orwellian “doublethink” to the Brady Court Orders, Dkt. 17
(o5cr1115) and Dkt. 32 (04cr1224) and where the Brady Court Orders commanded the disclosure
of all Brady materials “prior to trial” Big Brother (USAG Merrick B. Garland), Damian Williams,
the DOJ, and the SDNO federal courts have in the tradition and vernacular of Newspeak mentally
rewritten the Brady doctrine and the Brady Court Orders to say “the USAO shall never disclose
any Brady exculpatory evidence.” The canonical example of Orwellian “doublethink.” The Party’s
doctrine is “Ware is guilty even though he is innocent.”
Page 15 of 54
Judge Ramos, Mr. Ware draws the Court’s attention to Ex. 6, infra,23 an excerpt of what
is being alleged by the government’s prosecutors (AUSA Melissa Childs, Andre Damian Williams,
et al., and by extension USAG Merrick B. Garland) to be the actual and official 05cr1115 docket.24
Judge Ramos, the record, Dkt. 251-2, filed by the government confirms as indisputable
material fact there were no official judicial proceedings on September 22, 2006, concerning
defendant “Jeremy Jones” regarding 1115. This again raise very distributing questions and issues
that concern the government’s prosecutors, former District Judge Pauley, magistrate Dolinger,
the District Clerk, and your (Edgardo Ramos) personal criminal culpability and liability.25
23
Note that, Ex. 6, infra, Dkt. 251-2, does not contain any reference or docket entry for
September 22, 2006, the alleged date of defendant “Jeremy Jones” alleged Rule 11 plea.
24 On May 12, 2021, AUSA Melissa Childs, knowingly, willfully, deliberately, in bad faith, and
recklessly, as a government lawyer, officer of the court, criminally filed the 05cr1115 docket, Dkt.
251-2, into the court as a government exhibit. Note that Dkt. 251-2 does not contain any
reference or docket entry for September 22, 2006, the alleged date of defendant “Jeremy Jones”
alleged Rule 11 plea.
25 Cf., Ex. 6, Dkt 251-2, with the fabricated and falsified alleged “certified” docket created,
fabricated, and manufactured on August 17, 2022, by Bankruptcy Clerk (NDGA) M. Regina
Thomas and Chief Bankruptcy Judge Wendy L. Hagenau—that is, Dkt. 199 (03-93031 (BC NDGA),
In re Group Management Corp., Chapter 11 case. See Dkt. 82 (1115) (Petitioner’s reply to the
Bankruptcy Clerk’s production response). The Bankruptcy Court (NDGA) also applies Orwellian
“doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” doctrine to 11 USC 107 judicial public records:
according to Big Brother Mr. Ware’s July 2012 Rule 60(d)(3) fraud on the court pleadings do not
exist even though M. Regina Thomas, Pat Sinback, and Wendy L. Hagenau all agree they exist
and “the court received” the fraud on the court pleadings. Bankruptcy Court Newspeak
“blackwhite” doctrine has rewritten history and removed all references to the July 2102 fraud on
the court pleadings.
Page 16 of 54
Furthermore, the Court nor the government, for unexplained reasons, have ever publicly
disclosed “Jeremy Jones” actual alleged,
• Rule 11 plea perjury contract, or
• a certified copy of a docket that contains the required Rule 55 entries. 26
This raises the following questions:
1. Did defendant “Jeremy Jones” actually, without undue influence and psychological
coercion, and with effective Sixth Amendment, independent legal counsel,27 enter a
knowing, willful, and voluntary Rule 11 plea on September 22, 2006, to the moot
charges in S1?28
26 Orwellian “doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” doctrine and vernacular require the Loyal
Party Members of SDNY (Oceania) to mentally remove September 22, 2006, from the calendar.
September 22, 2006, no longer exists in the past reality of SDNY and has been removed from all
calendars by ORDER of Big Brother.
27 Marlon G. Kirton, Esq., Jones’ CJA appointed lawyer was appointed and paid (bribed, and paid
kickbacks) by Judge Pauley, and therefore, Kirton was also subject to the undue and psychological
influence of Judge Pauley’s and the USAO’s threats and other intimidations during the 1115
proceedings—that is, Kirton’s independence and loyalty to Jones must be investigated and
assessed.
28 It is likely that Jones never entered a voluntary (not under the illegal coercion and psychological
intimidation of his corrupt and compromised CJA lawyer appointed and paid by District Judge
Pauley), knowing, and willing bogus and fabricated Rule 11 plea to a conspiracy that Jones knew
he was not involved in. See Ex. 7, infra. Why would anyone voluntarily and knowingly plead guilty
to a conspiracy in which they know they are not involved other than through intense
psychological coercion and intimidation? Cf., Edward T.M. Garland’s (Mr. Ware’s retained Sixth
Amendment lawyer) attempted psychological coercion and intimidation of Mr. Ware to force Mr.
Ware to plead guilty to the bogus and moot charges in 1115 and 04cr1224 (SDNY). See Dkt. 1-2,
Ex. 18, and Appx. 2.
Page 17 of 54
2. Did defendant “Jeremy Jones” actually appear in the magistrate court (SDNY)
(Dolinger, J.) on September 22, 2006, while represented by Sixth Amendment
independent and effective counsel and knowingly and voluntarily enter a Rule 11 plea
of guilty to S1 moot charges related to the 03-0831 (D. NV) moot subject matter—that
is, (I) the immaterial press release of INZS and SVSY; and (II) a bogus and fabricated
conspiracy that the SEC’s lawyers did not belief Jones knowingly participated in?29
C. Judge Ramos’ conduct is unprecedented, delusional, corrupt, and criminal

Orwellian “doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” judicial doctrine.
The current undisputed record, cf., Dkt. 1-2, Declaration of Petitioner, before the Court in
22cv3409 (SDNY) cast Judge Ramos in a very unforgiving, and untenable light as a sitting Article
III federal judge subject to the Codes of Conduct for Federal Judges, and federal criminal
statutes—that is, 18 USC 1519 and 2071. Judge Ramos has to date maliciously, egregiously, and
flagrantly abused any judicial discretion he might have, and moreover, Judge Ramos has acted in
29See Dkt. 1-2, Ex. 8, Ex. 7, infra, (SEC’s concealed and suppress Brady email to the actual Jeremy
Jones that informed Jones he was not added to the commingled DOJ-SEC 03-0831 (D. NV) lawsuit,
“because the Comm’n believed your [and Mr. Ware’s employees’] deposition that you were not
aware of any conspiracy and would not have been involved had you known ….”), (the “SEC’s
Brady Email”). (paraphrased)(emphasis added). Cf., the SEC’s Brady Email with Dkt. 1-2, Ex. 29-
5.1, Marlon G. Kirton’s December 20, 2005, letter to District Judge Pauley, noting to the Court, “I
have spoken with lead S.E.C. attorney on this case [03-0831 (D. NV)], Jeff Norris [cf., Dkt. 84 and
86 (1115)] concerning Mr. Jones. Mr. Jones was never made a defendant in the [sham and
fabricated DOJ-SEC 03-0831 (D. NV)] lawsuit … [because the SEC’s lawyers believed Jones’ and
Mr. Ware’s employees’ deposition testimony, i.e., dispositive Brady exculpatory evidence that
has been suppressed and concealed by the SEC and DOJ in willful and bad faith resistance and
disobedience to the Brady Court Order, Dkt. 17, Ex. 3-1, infra; 18 USC 401(3) criminal and civil
contempt of the Brady Court Order].”
Page 18 of 54
a manner that strongly suggests he is currently suffering from mental defects, medical mental
illness,30 to such an extent he is medically disqualified from competently executing functions, and
functioning as an Article III federal judge.31
More sinister motives also exist for Judge Ramos’ bizarre instances of criminal judicial
misconduct, which being Judge Ramos, unfortunately, has been compromised and rendered
constitutionally suspect by the undue and political corruption influences of New York Senator
Charles Ellis Schumer, et al.32
D. Andre Damian Williams’ Conduct is unprecedented Orwellian “doublethink”

prosecutorial misconduct and Newspeak “blackwhite” prosecutorial doctrine and
procedure.
30 Judge Ramos is under the mental influence, suffers from Orwellian “doublethink,” and is under
the total mind control of Newspeak “blackwhite” judicial doctrine pronounced by Big Brother at
the DOJ’s division of Oceania. Ramos is certified crazy which is evident from his many instances
of judicial financial misconduct by not recusing himself from proceedings in which he has a
financial interest in one of the parties. Ramos’ application of Orwellian “doublethink” Newspeak
“blackwhite” judicial doctrine premises that he is not legally disqualified, but Newspeak
“blackwhite” judicial doctrine permits him to judicially participate in proceedings that he is not
legally authorized to participate in.
31It appears from public reporting that Judge Ramos is making a career of financial judicial
conflicts of interest, and refusing to recuse himself when demanded by federal law, 28 USC
455(a), and 455(b)(1-4). Based on Judge Ramos’ repeated instances of alleged financial judicial
misconduct one can draw a reasonable inference that Judge Ramos is incompetent, delusional,
and suffering from severe memory and comprehension issues that have caused Judge Ramos to
be a threat to the due administration of justice.
32Ramos is under the complete mind control of Newspeak, “doublethink” and the political
control of Big Brother’s ability to not prosecute criminals, and the Jabberwocky’s (Charles Ellis
Schumer’s) ability to control Big Brother’s (USAG Garland’s) thoughts.
Page 19 of 54
U.S Attorney (SDNY) Andre Damian Williams, a Loyal Party Member in SDNY (Oceania) an
acolyte of Big Brother, and by extension the Jabberwocky, swore loyalty to Orwellian
“doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” prosecutorial doctrine and vernacular as applied to
the criminal statutes in Title 18 of the U.S. Code which has been written as Title 81 of New
Oceania (N.O.).33
It appears that a new Orwellian Newspeak “blackwhite” prosecutorial doctrine has
produced a new law. Pursuant to Title 81, Section 1961(6)(B), all RICO criminal unlawful usury
debt collection activities conducted by RICO continuing criminal enterprise Alpha Capital, AG
(Anstalt) and its unindicted coconspirators shall be deemed legal commercial activity, and shall
not be investigated or prosecuted, criminally or civilly, in any aspect, in the courts of New
33 Williams, an alleged graduate of Yale Law School, a purported scholar of the law, a “person
going to high places” drank the punch and shallowed Big Brother’s philosophy and political
doctrines of Orwellian “doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” prosecutorial doctrine to such
an extent that it has been reported that Williams a “Jamaican-American” a black man, has been
known to say consistent with Newspeak “blackwhite” doctrine, “ … I am not black, I am just a
dark skin white man … your eyes cannot be trusted ….” (emphasis in original). Palpably, Williams
has bought in 100% to “doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” historical revisions and social
distortions in his personal life as well as in the law.
However, is the person currently purporting to be Andre Damian Williams, Jr., the actual person
who actually graduate from Harvard College and Yale Law School? Or has “doublethink” and
Newspeak “blackwhite” revisionist doctrine rewritten the historical record and placed this person
as an impersonator to replace the “real” Andre Damian Williams, Jr.? Evidence suggest that is
why the 28 USC 2243 show cause order has not been entered in 22cv3409 (SDNY) despite the
actual innocent habeas corpus case being filed on March 21, 2022.
That is the real reason behind the Orwellian “doublethink” conspiracy that the 28 USC 2243 show
cause order has not been entered in 22cv3409 (SDNY) by Judge Ramos, a Loyal Party Member:
to cover up and conceal the fact that the person purporting to be Andre Damian Williams, Jr. is
an impostor put in place and controlled by USAG Merrick B. Garland and Charles Ellis Schumer.
Page 20 of 54
Oceania; and all person or entities that make any allegations or reports of alleged unlawful
activity committed by Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt) shall be criminally prosecuted, convicted, and
sentenced to long prison sentences even though innocent of all charges. That is the order and
political Newspeak “blackwhite” doctrine announced from Newspeak’s prosecutorial ministry.
Moreover, the DOJ’s Newspeak prosecutorial ministry has written a new retroactive law,
retroactive to 200,000 B.C. to protect unlawful criminal usury debt collection activity exclusively
committed by the international RICO continuing criminal enterprise Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt)
and its unindicted coconspirators.
1. PLEASE BE ADVISED AND TAKE NOTICE OF NEWSPEAK’s TITLE 18 USCO SECTION 1.
Title 18 USCO Section 1, the first law,
a. It shall be a capital crime against the State, punishable by death, by crucifixion,
and/or ten life sentences, to be served consecutively, a fine of
$100,000,000,000,000 dollars payable in 100% pure gold;
b. and once dead, an additional sentence shall be imposed of 100 years of hard labor,
which the family of the convicted person shall serve;
c. the sentence shall be imposed, whether guilty or innocent, on any person, or entity
whosoever shall make any claim, report, allegation, or other announcement of
criminal activity associated with the RICO unlawful debt collection activities of
Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt) and its unindicted coconspirators.
Page 21 of 54
d. No indictment or charging paper shall be required to initiate a criminal proceeding
charging a violation under Section 1 of this Title.
e. The suspect, defendant, shall not be shown any charging paper until after
arrested, prosecuted, convicted, and the death sentence is served.
f. There shall be no appeal of the death sentence until after the death sentence has
been served; and then only the defendant shall have standing to file any notice of
appeal.
g. No trial shall be given to the person(s) so charged until convicted, sentenced, and
the after death sentence has been served.
h. That is the law of the State of New Oceania which shall be to prosecute all acts of
kindness, and ignore all criminal acts.
E. USAG Merrick B. Garland’s conduct is unprecedented Orwellian “doublethink”

Newspeak “blackwhite” prosecutorial misconduct.
The Holy Bible says in the Book of James, Chapter 1, verses 7-8: “For let not that man
think that he shall receive anything of the Lord. A double-minded man is unstable in all his ways.”
USAG Merrick B. Garland is a “double-minded man” conflicted and divided, “unstable,” in his
loyalties to the public and his master, his Godfather, New York Senator Charles Ellis Schumer.
Mr. Garland is clearly unstable in all his ways. The canonical case of incongruent duplicity.
Page 22 of 54
First, in 1999 as a circuit judge on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, in the In re Sealed
Case, 185 F.3d 887 (D.C. Cir. 1999), as a federal judge under an oath to interpret the law USAG
Garland’s view of the law was in strict compliance with the Constitution’s Brady doctrine
regarding the government’s cooperation agreement disclosure obligations. Now as a prosecutor
in executing (enforcing) the law USAG Garland’s loyalty to the law is now divided and has shifted
to a doctrine of Orwellian Newspeak “blackwhite” pecuniary largess: the prosecutorial aspect of
the law is for sale to the highest bidders solicited by his master Charles Ellis Schumer to have it
appear that Garland is impartial and unbiased. Buried deep inside the DOJ’s headquarters
tirelessly slaving away for the good of the law. A sheep dressed up to appear as a wolf.
2. The USAO, and DOJ are currently concealing and willfully suppressing the alleged Sept.
22, 2006, Rule 11 Jeremy Jones Perjury Pleadings in 18 USC 401(3) criminal contempt of the
Brady Court Order, Dkt. 17, Ex. 3-1, and 3-2, infra.
Mr. Garland’s mental processes are being torn apart and are very unstable, given he is
attempting to serve two masters, the law and Schumer. It is easier to have a “camel go through
the eye of a needle”34 than for USAG Garland to loyally serve both the law and Schumer’s
insatiable avariciousness.
With regard to the government’s disclosure of Jeremy Jones’ Perjury Pleadings, USAG
Garland’s former law clerk, U.S. Attorney (SDNY) Andre Damian Williams, Jr., and by extension
34See Mathew 19:24: “Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle,
than for a rich man [who places his faith in wealth and status] to enter the kingdom of God.”
Amplified Bible.
Page 23 of 54
USAG Garland, jointly, have the constitutional duty and obligation to come forth and disclose
Jones’ Perjury Pleadings, or state publicly the Perjury Pleadings do not exist but were fabricated
by AUSA Alexander H. Southwell, U.S. Attorney Michael J. Garcia, Marlon G. Kirton, Judges
Dolinger, and Pauley as a conspiracy to fraudulent convict Petitioner as a retaliatory racially-
motivated hate crime. See Dkt. 4-2, infra (the Dolinger Letter’s excerpt).
However, for Mr. Garland and his acolyte Damian Williams to move in that direction and
remove the pecuniary motivation from law enforcement, 35the commercialization of the law,
Senator Schumer would have to approve that decision. A cross way too heavy for Mr. Garland’s
weak personality to bear.
F. The State Bar of Georgia’s Delusional Orwellian “Doublethink” Newspeak

“blackwhite” Conspiracy to Alter Physical Reality.
Exhibit 5, infra, is the State Bar of Georgia‘s (the “State Bar”), risible, blind, and delusional
adherence to Orwellian “doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” reality alteration distortions
philosophy. In Ex. 5, infra, the State Bar and its delusional employees,36 adamantly, actually
35The 02cv2219 (SDNY) lawsuit was about money; 04cr1224 was about money; 05cr1115 was
about money; 03-93031 was about money; and 03-0831 (D. NV) was about money. Remove the
pecuniary motivation and there you have removed the incentive for Garland and Williams to
exist. Cf., with Ramos’ numerous instances of financial judicial misconduct. “All roads lead to
Rome” or Charles Ellis Schumer’s, et al., financial shenanigan regarding Alpha Capital, AG
(Anstalt) loan sharking RICO criminal enterprise’s operations.
36William D. NeSmith, III, Paula Fredrick, Jenny Mittelman, Leigh Burgess, Jonathan Hewitt,
William P. Smith, III, Carmen Rojas-Rafter, Adrienne Nash, William Alan Myers, Connie P. Henry,
Dan O’Sullivan, and others.
Page 24 of 54
claimed, and truly believes, that Petitioner, Ulysses T. Ware, exerted superpowers and defied
space-time physical reality physics, and was able to be in two different locations at the same
time on January 15, 2007, at “10:42 AM”:
1. The State Bar claims that at the same time on January 15, 2007, Mr. Ware was in the
BOP’s MDC federal prison in Brooklyn, NY at “10:42 AM” and was actually personally
served by the Kings County Sheriff’s Department with disbarment papers, (see Ex. 5,
infra);
2. When in fact court records established that Mr. Ware at “10:42 AM” on January 15, 2007,
was not in the custody of the BOP, but was present at 500 Pearl St., New York, NY, in a
courtroom before District Judge William H. Pauley, III, and not in the BOP’s MDC federal
prison in Brooklyn, NY, and was not actually “personally served” with papers by the Kings
County Sheriff’s Department.
Yet to this very day, August 21, 2022, the State Bar, and its delusional and crazy
employees cling to delusional “doublethink” Newspeak “blackwhite” Orwellian space-time
distortion conspiracy to steal Mr. Ware’s license to practice law and earn a living. This issue can
easily and readily be proven true or false by the State Bar by requesting access to the BOP’s
custody records for Mr. Ware on January 15, 2007. Which then will pop the State Bar’s
psychological “doublethink” delusional Newspeak “blackwhite” conspiracy and force the State
Bar to wake up and face non “doublethink” reality and face real consequences, draconian
monetary liability estimated at $225M in compensation resulting from delusional, crazy, and plain
Page 25 of 54
foolish notions of psychological political control exerted by Big Brother and the Jabberwocky’s
undue political influences.
Believe it or not, it is true. The State Bar and its delusional employees actually believe,
without any proof, the physically impossible that Mr. Ware was present at “10:42 AM” on January
15, 2007, in custody at the MDC, and was personally served by the Kings County Sheriff’s
Department; and was not before District Judge Pauley in the U.S. Courthouse at 500 Pearl St., NY,
NY, at “10:42 AM” on January 15, 2007. Both events cannot simultaneously be true; yet the State
Bar and its delusional and foolish employees believe that both events can both be true at the
same time. Orwellian “doublethink” Newspeak “blackwhite” doctrine as its best and worst in a
state agency.
G. Dangerous and Delusional Orwellian “Doublethink” and Newspeak

“blackwhite” doctrine by Mr. Ware’s Retained Lawyers, Edward T.M.
Garland, et al.
See Ex. 10, infra, the dangerous and delusional Orwellian “doublethink” Newspeak
psychological domination political philosophy of Edward T.M. Garland, et al., Mr. Ware’s retained
Sixth Amendment legal for representation in 04cr1224 (SDNY) and 05cr1115 (SDNY). Garland, et
al., were retained by Mr. Ware for legal representation in 1224 and 1115. Yet the dockets in both
1224 and 1115 indisputably confirm that Garland, et al., did nothing more than steal Mr. Ware’s
retainer, and never filed one single adversarial pleading attacking the government’s moot cases
or defending Mr. Ware in either 1224 or 1115.
Page 26 of 54
Yet in Ex. 10-1, infra, when Mr. Ware contacted Garland in April 2019 in regard to his
cases, Garland boldly and with extreme arrogance responded and proclaimed, while under the
psychological control and complete domination of Big Brother’s “doublethink” political dogma,
knowing that he did nothing to defend the cases stated, see the following page:
Ex. 10-1, infra.
Even though the dockets in 1224 and 1115 confirm that Garland did absolutely nothing in
both cases—that is, in 1224 Garland only filed papers for continuances, and even refused to file
the standard Brady discovery motions; and in 1115, the docket shows that Garland did not even
Page 27 of 54
file an entry of appearance, and refused to appear at Mr. Ware’s 2005 37arraignment in the
magistrate court. Garland, nevertheless, is under the delusional “doublethink” mind control and
Newspeak political dogma to this day thinks that he and his affiliates “did anything improper,
wrong, or unethical” in the 1224 and 1115 criminal cases.
On the one hand, either Garland, et al. are completely ignorant to the Sixth Amendment’s
requirements explained in Supreme Court ineffective assistance of counsel precedents Strickland
and Cronic opinions; or on the other hand, Garland is mentally delusional and suffers from mental
illness and perfidy. Yet, being under the mind control of Orwellian Newspeak “blackwhite”
doctrine sincerely believes, in the face of overwhelming precedent, without any legal support,
that he “did nothing wrong …” by doing absolutely nothing to defend Mr. Ware in 1224 and
1115. Both events cannot be true at the same time, and Garlands’ delusional position is
inconsistent for the purpose of the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel
precedent.38
Ostensibly, in Garland’s delusional mind, and Orwellian “doublethink” altered reality, the
prevailing Constitution’s Sixth Amendment’s effective assistance of counsel jurisprudence has
37 Because Garland, et al, even though retained to appear and represent Mr. Ware, stole the
retainer, tricked, and willfully deceived Mr. Ware, and refused to appear at the Sept. 2005
arraignment in 05cr1115. The magistrate court appointed CJA lawyer Isabella Kirshner as counsel
for Mr. Ware for the purpose of arraignment, Rule 5, proceeding.
38 Garland, et al., apparently is a criminal enterprise, or was promised favors and illegal gratuities
to look the other way and turn a bling eye and a deaf ear to the DOJ’s crimes committed against
Mr. Ware. In any event Garland, et al., is liable to Mr. Ware for their unethical and criminal
ineffective assistance of counsel committed in 1224 and 1115.
Page 28 of 54
been subjected to delusional Newspeak “blackwhite” revision, and rewritten to, according to
Garland, permitted and required he and his affiliates to not appear, not function as “effective”
‘independent” legal “counsel,” and not adversarily attack the government’s charges in 1224 and
1115. This is the delusional Orwellian “doublethink” Newspeak “blackwhite” distorted mental
reality that Garland, et al. function in. A very dangerous and untenable circumstance for any
person charged with a crime to be subjected to.
H. Delusional Orwellian Newspeak “Doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” doctrinal

Inconsistencies in the Proceedings.
Herein this application Petitioner in Sections A-G, supra, has presented numerous
delusional and deranged Orwellian factual and legal Newspeak “blackwhite” inconsistencies in
the proceedings, (the “Delusional Inconsistencies”), which can only rationally be explained by
the application of an Orwellian “doublethink” Newspeak “blackwhite” analytical framework.
It is not constitutionally or legally possible for Mr. Ware to have simultaneously (i)
received a constitutional complaint “fair trial” and (ii) at the same time the government does not
disclose “all” material Brady evidence as ordered by the Brady Court Orders, Dkt. 17 (05cr1115)
and Dkt. 32 (04cr1224). Both propositions cannot be true at the same time.
Thus, for one to suggest the opposite conclusion, either that person is under the
psychological influence and domination of Orwellian “doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite”
revisionist alternative reality, or that person is mentally retarded and delusional.
Page 29 of 54
Mr. Ware has presented numerous items of DOJ and USAO undisclosed and willfully
suppressed and concealed items of dispositive Brady exculpatory and impeachment evidence in
the actual or constructive possession of the government’s prosecutors. See Ex. 8, infra (FINRA’s
May 17, 2021, certification of unregistered broker-dealers status for each of the 02cv2219
(SDNY) plaintiffs).39
As a matter of law, the 02cv2219 (SDNY) plaintiffs cannot be “unregistered broker-
dealers” and at the same time have Article III standing in:
1. 02cv2219 (SDNY) to be plaintiffs, and
2. At the same time on April 10, 2003, Dkt. 10, appear in GPMT’s 03-93031 (BC NDGA)
Chapter 11 case, as alleged “creditors,” and on April 11, 2003, Dkt. 15, 16, request judicial
relief from the Bankruptcy Court.
Unregistered broker-dealer status ipso facto is inconsistent with Article III standing and
ipso facto disqualified the 02cv2219 (SDNY plaintiffs from requesting and being granted any
39Also see, Dkt. 1-2, Ex. 22 (the SEC’s 2003 judicial admissions and confessions made in 03-0831
(D. NV) complaint, on behalf of the United States and its privies, the real parties in interest,
judicial and equitable estoppel against the SEC, the FBI, the DOJ, the Admin. Office of the U.S.
Court, et al.). In 2003 the SEC, on behalf of the United States, the same plaintiff in 04cr1224 and
05cr1115, in paragraph 33 of the 03-0831 (D. NV) complaint pleaded the United States and its
privies out of the federal courts with respect to moot subject matter—that is, the press releases
of INZS and SVSY were immaterial, and thus, ipso facto, not actionable civilly or criminally in the
Article III federal court, as “a concrete injury in fact”).
Page 30 of 54
judicial relief in the federal courts--that is, the 02cv2219 (SDNY), 03-93031 (BC NDGA), 04cr1224
(SDNY), 05cr1115 (SDNY), and 22cv3409 (SDNY) proceedings.
Furthermore, as a matter of law, it is a legal impossibility and Article III inconsistency for
the 02cv2219 (SDNY) plaintiffs to have been granted judicial relief in GPMT’s Chapter 11, 03-
93031, May 21, 2003, Dkt. 28, Order of dismissal with prejudice of the Chapter 11 case, and at
the same time, in the same pleading seek collection on the RICO unlawful criminal usury debt in
the amount of $1.1M.40
The Bankruptcy Court (NDGA) as a matter of law cannot simultaneously (i) possess Article
III subject matter jurisdiction over Dkt. 15 and Dkt. 16, the 02cv2219 (SDNY) request for judicial
relief, and (ii) at the same time as the 02cv2219 plaintiffs are unregistered broker-dealers. Both
events cannot simultaneously be legally true.41
The State Bar risibly asks that the Newtonian laws of physics be suspected and to adopt
its delusional Orwellian “doublethink” Newspeak “blackwhite” philosophy and to believe that
40See federal law, 15 USC 78cc(b); and Adar Bays, LLC, v. GeneSYS ID, Inc., 28 F.4d 379 (2d Cir.
2022), and N.Y. Penal Law, Section 190.40, the criminal usury law, a class E felony.
41The Bankruptcy Chief Judge (NDGA) Wendy L. Hagenau is indisputably mentally deranged and
under the psychological control and mental domination of Orwellian “doublethink” and
Newspeak “blackwhite” doctrine. See Dkt. 187 (03-93031) (Debtor’s third request for Rule
12(h)(3) Article III jurisdictional status conference). Hagenau has applied Orwellian Newspeak
“blackwhite” doctrine to distort the fact that as a matter of law as of December 20, 2007, the
Bankruptcy Court (NDGA) lacked Article III subject matter jurisdiction over Dkt. 11, 15, 16, and
28, given the entry of the voluntary Rule 41(a)(2) final judgment in 02cv2219 (SDNY). Hagenau is
delusional and lives in a Looking Glass reality.
Page 31 of 54
Mr. Ware on January 15, 2007, at “10:42 AM” was simultaneously located at (i) the Bureau of
Prison’s MDC federal prison in Brooklyn, NY,42 (ii) and also at the same time Mr. Ware actually
was located in the U.S. Courthouse located at 500 Pearl St., NY, NY, in a courtroom before District
Judge Pauley; and the State Bar also ask that we believe that (iii) Mr. Ware was “personally
served” with State Bar papers by the Kings County Sheriff’s Department at “10:41 AM” on January
15, 2007, even though Mr. Ware was never present in the MDC on January 15, 2007, according
to BOP records.43
However, the State Bar has never obtained from the BOP certified custody records that
confirmed whether or not Mr. Ware was in fact actually in physical custody on January 15, 2007,
in the MDC federal prison in Brooklyn, NY. Thus, the question is raised: What is the State Bar
hiding? And whose control and domination is the State Bar under? According to the State Bar,
it is not subject to the laws of physics, causality, and logical reasoning.
42 See Ex. 5, infra, the State Bar’s fabricated Orwellian “doublethink” Newspeak, revisionist, bogus
affidavit of alleged personal service of Petitioner on January 15, 2007. Under the State Bar’s
delusional reasoning and logic, the bogus affidavit of service is true and correct not by fact, but
by fiat and divine manifestation, i.e., ipse dixit (just because they said it’s so, makes it so—a new
and revolutionary form of quantum thought processing that is not subject to Newtonian physical
laws). The State Bar and its delusional employees will likely win the Nobel Prize in physics for
their revolutionary thought physics.
43The State Bar has abdicated any credibility it might have been entitled to by the lunacy and
foolishness advanced by its delusional employees, not the sharpest knives in the drawer, under
the influence of mental subjugation and domination of Orwellian “doublethink” and Newspeak
“blackwhite” doctrines.
Page 32 of 54
Clearly, the laws of physics in this universe do not allow Mr. Ware to be in two different
locations on January 15, 2007, at 10:42 AM. Accordingly, the State Bar has no legitimate factual
basis to assert the veracity and authenticity of the bogus and fabricated counterfeit purported
affidavit of service, Ex. 5, infra.
The government asserts as true and correct, based in reality, in its delusional Orwellian
“doublethink” Newspeak 04cr1224 (SDNY) indictment’s paragraphs, ¶¶ 8-11, the orders and
judgments in 02cv2219 (SDNY) were “lawful” and logically true and correct despite the
indisputable contradictory facts,
1. the 02cv2219 (SDNY) plaintiffs are indisputable unregistered broker-dealers;44
2. the 02cv2219 (SDNY) plaintiffs admitted in the 02cv2219 complaint at ¶¶10-21 to be 15
USC 77b(a)(11) statutory underwriters legally ineligible for Rule 144(k) per SEC Release
33-7190 n. 17 (1995);
3. despite the fact the government in ¶¶ 8-11 on the face of the 04cr1224 indictment
pleaded affirmative defenses which pleaded the government out of court; and
4. despite the indisputable fact the Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt), et al., February 2001 $1.1M
loan was a criminal usury uncollectible debt; and the loan contracts GX 1-4 and GX-5 were
illegal, unenforceable, and null and void ab initio illegal contracts.
It cannot be simultaneously true that items 1-4 above are true, and at the same time
allegations in the 04cr1224 indictment also are true—that is, the government cannot lawfully
44
See Ex. 8, infra.
Page 33 of 54
procure an indictment to enforce a RICO unlawful criminal usury illegal debt, in favor of
unregistered broker-dealers, who are statutory underwriters, for the enforcement of illegal, null
and void ab initio loan contracts, GX 1-4 and GX-5.
I. Reliefs requested to address the numerous instances of criminal Orwellian

“doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” judicial and prosecutorial doctrine
committed in the sub judice proceedings.
For the foregone reasoning, factual assertions, and legal analysis Petitioner request the
following reliefs be entered:
1. set this matter down for an evidentiary hearing for the government, the State Bar of
Georgia, the Bankruptcy Court, Marlon G. Kirton, Merrick B. Garland, Andre Damian
Williams, Jr., the FBI, and the SEC to come forth, produce evidence, give testimony in
court, and dispute or oppose the allegations made herein;
2. for District Judge Edgardo Ramos45 to come forth produce evidence and give testimony
regarding his mental fitness to function as an Article III federal judge; and to show cause
why he shall not be referred to the DOJ’s Division of Public Integrity and prosecuted for
conspiracy to obstruct justice and other crimes;
45Who likely is suffering from mental retardation and other mental defects; and thus, poses a
serious threat to the administration of justice.
Page 34 of 54
3. that M. Regina Thomas, Wendy L. Hagenau,46 Patricia Sinback, Joyce Bihary, Coleman Ray
Mullins, Margaret H. Murphy, Dennis S. Meir, John W. Mills, III, J. Henry Walker, III,
Kilpatrick, Townsend, & Stockton, LLP, Merrick B. Garland, Andre Damian Williams, Jr.,
and Kenneth A. Zitter to come forth, produce evidence, give testimony opposing the
factual and legal assertions made herein, give testimony, and explain why Dkt. 28, May
21, 2003, Order has not been vacated, set aside, reversed, and annulled given the
02cv2219 (SDNY) plaintiffs on April 10, 2003, Dkt. 10, then were unregistered broker-
dealers that lacked Article III standing to have appeared in the 03-93031 Chapter 11
case;47
4. that Merrick B. Garland, Andre Damian Williams, Jr., Jeremy Jones, Marlon G. Kirton,
former magistrate judge Michael H. Dolinger, Michael J. Garcia, and Ruby Krajick to come
forth, produce evidence, and give testimony regarding the alleged events of September
46 Likely suffering from mental retardation and other mental defects to such an extent, that she
is a serious threat to the administration of justice.
47It is as a matter of law legally inconsistent for the 02cv2219 plaintiffs, unregistered broker-
dealers, to have Article III standing to appear in the 03-93031 Bankruptcy Court on April 10, 2003,
Dkt. 11; and currently the May 21, 2003, Dkt. 28 Order to not have been vacated, reversed, and
annulled for lack of Article III subject matter jurisdiction over the proceedings, Dkt. 15, and Dkt.
16 given the fact of the voluntary December 20, 2007, Dkt. 90, Rule 41(a)(2) final judgment
entered in 02cv2219 (SDNY). See Ex. 11, infra.
Only foolish, delusional, and mentally deficient Orwellian “doublethink” and Newspeak
“blackwhite” doctrine have convinced Wendy L. Hagenau and M. Regina Thomas that an Article
III jurisdictional legal impossibility does not apply in the 03-93031 Chapter 11 case; and that
Article III of the Constitution does not apply to Dkt. 28, the May 21, 2003, purported moot Order
(Murphy, J.) in the 03-93031 proceedings.
Page 35 of 54
22, 2006, in the magistrate court (SDNY) concerning the alleged Rule 11 proceedings that
purportedly involved defendant Jeremy Jones;
5. that the State Bar, its employees, and the BOP’s MDC warden to come forth, produce
evidence, and give testimony regarding Ex. 5, infra, the alleged January 15, 2007, affidavit
of personal service on Ulysses T. Ware;
6. for the U.S. Department of Justice to come forth, produce evidence, give testimony, and
confirm the identity of the person claimed to be Jeremy Jones who allegedly appeared in
the magistrate court (SDNY) on September 22, 2006, and entered a purported Rule 11
plea to S1 in 05cr1115;
7. for District Clerk (SDNY) Ruby Krajick to come forth, produce evidence, give testimony,
and prove the location and authenticity of the alleged Jeremy Jones’ Perjury Pleadings
and produce certified copies of each judicial public record;
8. that Kilpatrick, Townsend, & Stockton, LLP come forth, produce evidence, and give
testimony regarding its representation of the 02cv2219 (SDNY) plaintiffs in In re Group
Management Corp. 03-93031 (BC NDGA), Chapter 11 case;
9. for the 02cv2219 (SDNY) plaintiffs, LH Financial Services, Inc., Ari Rabinowitz, Kenneth A.
Zitter; and Andre Damian Williams, Jr, and Merrick B. Garland, to come forth, present
evidence, give testimony, and explain why the 04cr1224 indictment was procured on
November 17, 2004, given the 02cv2219 (SDNY) plaintiffs then were unregistered broker-
dealers, Section 2(a)(11) statutory underwriters of GPMT, and Section 16 statutory
insiders of GPMT ineligible for Rule 144;
Page 36 of 54
10. for the SEC, the government, former FBI special agent David Makol, FBI analyst Maria A.
Font, Andre Damian Williams, and Merrick B. Garland to come forth, produce evidence,
give testimony, and prove why the indictment in 05cr1115 (SDNY) is not null and void ab
initio and moot given the SEC’s judicial admission pleaded at ¶33 of the July 2003 03-0831
(D. NV) unsigned complaint;
11. that Edward T.M. Garland and his affiliates come forth, produce evidence of all pleadings
filed in 04cr1224 and 05cr1115, produce all escrow records of all retainers, expenses, and
other expenditures regarding the representation in 1224 and 1115, give testimony,
oppose, or admit the allegations contained herein, and explain why he and his affiliates
shall not be sanctioned pursuant to 28 USC 1927, the Court’s supervisory authority, and
the inherent power of the Court; and
12. any other relief deemed just and proper given the circumstances.
Respectfully submitted by:

Ulysses T. Ware
/s/ Ulysses T. Ware
August 21, 2022.
Page 37 of 54
Distribution List
The individuals listed below were served via email with a copy of this pleading on August
21, 2022.
Office of the United States Attorney (SDNY)

Office of the Chief District Judge (SDNY)
District Judge Edgardo Ramos (SDNY)
Office of the U.S. Attorney General
Office of the Chief Bankruptcy Judge (NDGA)
The State Bar of Georgia
Office of the United States Attorney (EDNY)
U.S. Bureau of Prisons (Warden, MDC, Brooklyn, NY)
The Wall Street Journal
The New York Times
J. Henry Walker, IV
John W. Mills, III
Edward T. M. Garland
The Securities and Exchange Commission
Sims W. Gordon, Jr.
Thomas J. Leghorn
Marlon G. Kirton
SEC’s General Counsel and Commissioners
Page 38 of 54
Exhibits
Page 39 of 54
Exhibit 1: Alleged Dkt. 24, Sept. 2006 Rule 11 Transcript
Page 40 of 54
Exhibit 2: Kirton’s USSG 5k Letter to Pauley, J.
Page 41 of 54
Exhibit 3-1: 1115 Brady Court order (1)
Page 42 of 54
Exhibit 3-2: 1115 Brady Court Order (2)
Page 43 of 54
Exhibit 4-1: 12/08/12 (Dolinger Jones Letter)
Page 44 of 54
Exhibit 4-2: Dkt 215:05cr1115 (Dolinger Jones Letter)
Page 45 of 54
Exhibit 5: State Bar of GA fabricated affidavit of personal service.
Page 46 of 54
Exhibit 6: alleged 05cr1115 official docket does not reference Sept. 22,
2006, alleged Rule 11 plea by Jeremy Jones.
Page 47 of 54
Exhibit 7: the Concealed SEC’s Brady Exculpatory Email.
Page 48 of 54
Exhibit 8: FINRA’s May 17, 2021, Certification of Unregistered Broker-

Dealer Status for Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt).
Page 49 of 54
Exhibit 9: Clerk’s demand for payment for access to Jones’ documents.
Page 50 of 54
Exhibit 10-1: Delusional Orwellian Doublethink by Edward Garland, et al.
Page 51 of 54
Exhibit 10-2: Delusional Orwellian Doublethink by Edward Garland, et al.
Page 52 of 54
Exhibit 11: 12/20/07 Voluntary Rule 41(a)(2) final judgment (02cv2219) (SDNY).
Page 53 of 54
End of
document
Page 54 of 54

DKT 88 Re Motion For FBI Referral

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DKT 88 Re Motion For FBI Referral

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case 1:22-cv-03409-ER Document 88 Filed 08/21/22 Page 1 of 54

Filed on 8/21/2022 08:12:13 PM

See Fed. R. Crim P. Rule 55: Records.

damian.williams@usdoj.gov, Jun Xiang was served at jun.xiang@usdoj.gov, and USAG Merrick B.

Garland was served via DUSAG Jeffrey R. Ragsdale, Jeffrey.ragsdale@usdoj.gov on 08.21.2022.

Exhibit 3-1: 1115 Brady Court order (1) ................................................................................................. 42

“It was the best of times, and the worst of times.”

“And Brutus and Cassius were honorable men.”

As Cicero stated in his opening statement to a session of the Roman Senate

August 22, 2022, Petition to the District Court.

Saturday, August 20, 2022

Via email to ChambersNYSDRamos@nysd.uscourts.gov

Government 05cr1115 (SDNY) “principal witness” Jeremy Jones’ missing and

for judicial relief this application addresses.4

4 Edgardo Ramos, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgardo_Ramos#cite_note-11, was nominated

THE QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW:

and sound discretion have been compromised.

absolutely immune to all prosecution. Which it appears to be despite being a confirmed

related proceedings, these pressing questions must be investigated and answered in an

District of New Oceania (SDNO).

1. the government’s “principal witness”10 Jeremy Jones, (“Jones”), who allegedly--

to the superseding indictment (S1) in U.S. v. Ware, 05cr1115 (SDNY), (“1115”)

suborned by the government’s prosecutors perjurious trial testimony in 1115;12

2. yourself concerning your personal continued reckless refusal application of

Orwellian “doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” doctrine, to immediately

(the “Very Disturbing Questions”).13

Ex. 9, infra (Clerk’s letter to Petitioner demanding payment to access documents).

contained no entries labeled Dkt. 24. 21

18 See Ex. 4-2, infra, Dkt. 215:1115

20 See Ex. 1, infra.

disclosed “Jeremy Jones” actual alleged,

• Rule 11 plea perjury contract, or

• a certified copy of a docket that contains the required Rule 55 entries. 26

This raises the following questions:

(Dolinger, J.) on September 22, 2006, while represented by Sixth Amendment

C. Judge Ramos’ conduct is unprecedented, delusional, corrupt, and criminal

functioning as an Article III federal judge.31

Charles Ellis Schumer, et al.32

D. Andre Damian Williams’ Conduct is unprecedented Orwellian “doublethink”

“doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” prosecutorial doctrine and vernacular as applied to

It appears that a new Orwellian Newspeak “blackwhite” prosecutorial doctrine has

political Newspeak “blackwhite” doctrine announced from Newspeak’s prosecutorial ministry.

and its unindicted coconspirators.

1. PLEASE BE ADVISED AND TAKE NOTICE OF NEWSPEAK’s TITLE 18 USCO SECTION 1.

Title 18 USCO Section 1, the first law,

a. It shall be a capital crime against the State, punishable by death, by crucifixion,

and/or ten life sentences, to be served consecutively, a fine of

$100,000,000,000,000 dollars payable in 100% pure gold;

which the family of the convicted person shall serve;

whosoever shall make any claim, report, allegation, or other announcement of

Alpha Capital, AG (Anstalt) and its unindicted coconspirators.

d. No indictment or charging paper shall be required to initiate a criminal proceeding

charging a violation under Section 1 of this Title.

arrested, prosecuted, convicted, and the death sentence is served.

the after death sentence has been served.

kindness, and ignore all criminal acts.

E. USAG Merrick B. Garland’s conduct is unprecedented Orwellian “doublethink”

regarding the government’s cooperation agreement disclosure obligations. Now as a prosecutor

to a doctrine of Orwellian Newspeak “blackwhite” pecuniary largess: the prosecutorial aspect of

Dolinger, and Pauley as a conspiracy to fraudulent convict Petitioner as a retaliatory racially-

weak personality to bear.

F. The State Bar of Georgia’s Delusional Orwellian “Doublethink” Newspeak

adherence to Orwellian “doublethink” and Newspeak “blackwhite” reality alteration distortions