You are on page 1of 63

Airside Energy

Recovery

“ Air-to-air energy
recovery “
© 2004 American Standard Inc.
Air-to-air energy recovery
• Why is airside energy recovery important
• Concept of Air-to-air energy recovery
• Technologies / Hardware
• Sensible heat recovery
• Run around coil loop
• Heat Pipe
• Fixed plate heat exchanger
• Total heat recovery
• Energy Wheel
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

• Integrating into Systems


• Summary
Why do you need to recover
energy ?
 Industrial Efforts & Standards
 ASHRAE/IESNA
Standard 90.1-2004

 Gov. Regulations
 Cost of energy increases
 Required by ASHRAE 90.1 -when:
 Design supply airflow  5,000 cfm for an
individual fan system
and
 Minimum outdoor-air supply is  70% of
design supply air
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

 Effectiveness  50%
Why recover energy?

300,000 250
HVAC energy consumption, kWh

cooling capacity required, tons


200,000 200

100,000 150
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

5 cfm/p 15 cfm/p 5 cfm/p 15 cfm/p


ventilation rate ventilation rate
example is for a school in Jacksonville, Florida
air-to-air energy recovery
Why Recover Energy?

“Energy can be neither


created nor destroyed, only
transferred.”
© 2004 American Standard Inc.
Air-to-air energy recovery
• Why is airside energy recovery important
• Concept of Air-to-air energy recovery
• Technologies / Hardware
• Sensible heat recovery
• Run around coil loop
• Heat Pipe
• Fixed plate heat exchanger
• Total heat recovery
• Energy Wheel
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

• Integrating into Systems


• Summary
energy-recovery technologies
Forms of Recovered Energy

 Sensible energy
 Heat sensed as temperature difference

 Latent energy
 Heat stored in water vapor

 Total energy
 Sum of sensible and latent energy
© 2004 American Standard Inc.
sensible
energy
recovery
EA' EA
OA' OA

humidity ratio
OA'
OA

EA EA'

dry-bulb temperature
total
energy
recovery
EA' EA
OA

humidity ratio
OA' OA' EA'
OA

EA

dry-bulb temperature
100 Analogy
Effectiveness
50
 Sensible effectiveness
0  = 50%

s  Vs (T1 – T2)
= 
exhaust side
min  Vmin (T1 – T3)
X4 X3
 Total effectiveness
air-to-air
heat exchanger
s  Vs (h1 – h2) X1 X2
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

= 
min  Vmin (h1 – h3) supply side
Equal Airflows

5 m3/s 5 m3/s
33°C X1 X3 25°C

heat exchanger

30.3°C X4 X2 27.7°C

5 m3/s (33°C – 27.7°C)


 =  = 66 %
5 m3/s (33°C – 25°C)
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

Qs = 1.21  5 m3/s  (33°C – 27.7°C) = 32.1 kW


Unbalanced Airflows

5 m3/s 3.5 m3/s


33°C X1 X3 25°C

heat exchanger

31.3°C X4 X2 28.6°C

5 m3/s (33°C – 28.6°C)


 =  = 79%
3.5 m3/s (33°C – 25°C)
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

Qs = 1.21  5 m3/s  (33°C – 28.6°C) = 26.8 kW


Uses for Air-to-Air Energy Recovery
 Outdoor-air preconditioning

 Supply-air tempering

 Both preconditioning and tempering


© 2004 American Standard Inc.
Outdoor-Air Preconditioning

EA

OA
© 2004 American Standard Inc.
Supply-Air Tempering (Reheat)

dedicated
outdoor-air unit
OA CA
constant-volume,
mixed-air system cooling reheat
coil coil
RA space EA
EA
reheat
coil space
SA
OA dedicated, outdoor-
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

cooling T RH
coil air system
Supply-Air Tempering

cooling
coil
SA

RA

“parallel”
energy recovery
“series”
energy transfer
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

cooling SA
coil
© 2007 American Standard Inc.

Air-to-Air Energy
Recovery

Outdoor-Air
Preconditioning
outdoor-air preconditioning
Sensible-Energy Recovery

EA RA
3.5 m3/s

coil loop

5 m3/s
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

OA SA
cooling QS = 1.21  OA Airflow  (Toa – Toa')
33°C DB,
OA = 1.21  5 m3/s  (33°C – 29.8°C)
26°C WB
= 19.4 kW
25°C DB,
RA
17.5°C WB
OA' 29.8°C DB
cooling
OA' OA

saves 19.4 kW

humidity ratio
RA

dry-bulb temperature
sensible-energy recovery • Singapore
cooling
QS = 1.21  5 m3/s  (34°C – 30.5°C )
34°C DB,
OA = 21.2 kW
22°C WB
25°C DB,
RA
17.5°C WB
OA' 30.5°C DB

humidity ratio
saves 21.2 kW
cooling
OA' OA
RA

dry-bulb temperature
sensible-energy recovery • Beijing
heating
-10°C DB,
QS = 1.21  5m3/s  (2.2 – -10)
OA = 73.8 kW
-10.3°C WB
21°C DB,
RA
12°C WB
OA' 2.2°C DB

humidity ratio
saves 73.8 kW
heating
OA RA

OA'

dry-bulb temperature
sensible-energy recovery • Beijing
outdoor-air preconditioning
Total-Energy Recovery

EA RA
3.5 m3/s

total-
energy
5 m3/s wheel
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

OA SA
cooling QT = 1.2  OA Airflow  (hoa – hoa')
OA
33°C DB, = 1.2  5 m3/s  (98.2 kJ/kg – 80.3 kJ/kg)
26°C WB = 107.4 kW
25°C DB,
RA
17.5°C WB
28.3°C DB,
OA'
21.4°C WB cooling
OA

humidity ratio
OA' saves 107.4 kW

RA

dry-bulb temperature
total-energy recovery • Singapore
cooling QT = 1.2  5 m3/s  (81.9 kJ/kg – 73.3 kJ/kg)
34°C DB, = 51.6 kW
OA
22°C WB
25°C DB,
RA
17.5°C WB
28.8°C DB,
OA' 19.6°C WB

humidity ratio
cooling
OA' OA
RA
saves 51.6 kW

dry-bulb temperature
sensible-energy recovery • Beijing
heating QS = 1.21  5 m3/s  (7.8°C – -10°C)
-10°C DB, = 107.7 kW
OA
-10.3°C WB
QL = 3,010  5 m3/s  (0.0035 – 0.0015)Kg/kg
21°C DB,
RA = 30.1 kW
12°C WB
7.8°C DB,
OA' 3.9°C WB

humidity ratio
saves 107.7 kW (sensible)
30.1 kW (latent)
heating RA
OA
OA'

dry-bulb temperature
sensible-energy recovery • Beijing
outdoor-air preconditioning
Summary of Plant Downsizing

Singapore Beijing
sensible  cooling plant 19.4 kW 21.2 kW
energy reduction
recovery
 heating plant 73.8 kW
reduction
total  cooling plant 107.4 kW 51.6 kW
energy reduction
recovery
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

 heating plant 107.7 kW


reduction [latent] [30.1kW]
outdoor-air preconditioning
Impact on First Cost

 Cooling and heating plant downsizing

 Increased fan motor sizes


 Added static pressure of the energy
recovery device

 Additional exhaust ductwork


© 2004 American Standard Inc.
outdoor-air preconditioning
Impact on Operating Cost

 Cooling and heating energy savings

 Increased fan energy use


© 2004 American Standard Inc.
outdoor-air preconditioning
Other Considerations

 Frost prevention

 Acceptable cross-leakage

 Occupancy period

 Fresh air amount

 Temperature of supply fresh air

Typical outdoor temperatures


© 2004 American Standard Inc.

 Cost of fuel/electricity
outdoor-air preconditioning
Insights and Ideas

 Total-energy recovery devices transfer


both sensible heat and moisture
 Allow larger reductions in cooling and
heating plant capacities
 Less susceptible to frost

 More balanced airflow increases the


total quantity of heat recovered

 Justifies a life-cycle cost analysis :


System Analyzer /Trace Program
© 2004 American Standard Inc.
Air-to-air energy recovery
• Why is airside energy recovery important
• Concept of Air-to-air energy recovery
• Technologies / Hardware
• Sensible heat recovery
• Run around coil loop
• Heat Pipe
• Fixed plate heat exchanger
• Total heat recovery
• Energy Wheel
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

• Integrating into Systems


• Summary
© 2007 American Standard Inc.

Air-to-Air Energy Recovery

Technologies / Hardware
Sensible Heat Recovery

• Run Around coil loop


© 2004 American Standard Inc.
sensible-energy recovery devices

Coil Loop -Principle of Operation


Two coils coupled together by a circulation system
OA
Pump sizing:
BHP = PM*WPD(FT)/{3960*EFF
(PUMP)*EFF(MOTOR)}
SA DB sensor
EA

expansion tank

pump
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

DB bulb - frost prevention


three-way
mixing valve
Coil Loop - Outdoor-Air Preconditioning
(Parallel run around coil - Dual Path )
ventilation recovery unit
with Run Around Coil loop
EA

Recirculating
OA air Ahu unit
SA

RA RA SA
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

EA

occupied space
matching technologies to systems
Coil Loop - Supply-Air Tempering

cooling
coil

SA

series energy transfer


© 2004 American Standard Inc.

Job site installation


series energy transfer
matching technologies to systems
Coil Loop - Supply-Air Tempering

The reheat amount is depends on OA


temperature (Location).

Reheat
BTU/CFM 7 11 17 22
Reheat Serial Run Around Coil Loop
Temp.Rise o F 5 10 15 20

60 o F 70 o F 80 o F 95 o F
OA DB
© 2004 American Standard Inc.
Advantages
Coil Loop
Disadvantages
 Exhaust and ventilation  Low recovery range (45% to
ductwork can be remote 55%)

 Many exhausts can be  Effectiveness is reduced


grouped on the same system during mild weather

 Good for retrofit applications  Full recovery rate cannot be


used if frost is formed on the
 Not much space is needed recovery coil
 Installation cost is  Creates additional static
comparatively low pressure drop
 Maintenance is simple  Requires expansion tank
 Pump energy can also be  Recovers only sensible heat
recovered
 Frosting
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

 Capacity can be modulated

 Bypass dampers can be used

 Flexible;Trane coil
Frosting- Coil Loop

EA
16.6°C
3.6°C DB 21°C DB
10.1°C
3.0°C WB 12°C WB
–1°C 6.4°C

–25.5°C
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

OA
–10°C DB 2.2°C DB
sensible-energy recovery devices
Fixed-Plate Heat Exchanger
 60% – 70% sensible
effectiveness

 Capacity modulation OA
using face-and-bypass
dampers
O
 Very low cross-leakage
A
 Cost effective in smaller
sizes (< 7cms)

 Simple & neat but


costly
E
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

Vendor software

A
AHU With A Fixed Plate Heat Exchanger

OA Preconditioning AHU Dehumidification &


Reheat AHU

OA

RA
E
A
© 2004 American Standard Inc.
Sensible Heat Recovery
• Heat Pipe
© 2004 American Standard Inc.
sensible-energy recovery devices
Heat Pipe

 30% – 55% C D
sensible
effectiveness

 Capacity modulation B
using bypass A
dampers or tilt
control

 Little or no cross-
leakage
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

 Vendor: Heat Pipe


Technology,
Florida,USA
Heat Pipe- Applications
 Dehumidification application considerations
 Supplementary source for reheat during part load
conditions
 Additional static pressure
 Perform economic analysis for justification
© 2004 American Standard Inc.
Heat Pipe
Advantages Disadvantages
 No continuously  Side-by-side duct
mechanical moving arrangement is needed
parts thus ,limited mounting
design.
 Recovery is practical for
a wide range of temp. (-  High capital $ per unit
50 deg C to 700 deg C) energy saved
 No external power is  Few suppliers
required
 High pressure drop
 Recovery Effectiveness :
45% to 70%  Cannot be turned off
easily when not required
 Wide variety of sizes !
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

 Simple to maintenance  Vendor software


 Transfer of heat within
the heat pipe is highly
efficient
total-energy recovery devices
Total-Energy Wheel

 Desiccant loading
: 65% – 80% total
effectiveness

 Capacity
modulation using EA
bypass dampers or RA
variable speed

 Some cross-
leakage
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

OA
 Self cleaning (dry
SA
particles)
Total Energy Wheel - Applications

 Also called heat wheel, rotary


regenerative heat exchanger, energy
transfer wheel or Ljungstrom wheel

 Employs a single exchange unit in


which the mass of the material of the
rotor serves as the heat carrier

 Airflow rate 25 to 35 000 l/s and up

 Face velocity 2.5 to 5 m/s


© 2004 American Standard Inc.

 Pressure drop 100 to 170 Pa


Total Energy Wheel - Applications

 2 sections casing

 400mm rotating wheel (1-3.7m dia)

 wheel divided into segments

 Air leakage/ contamination


 sealing is difficult
 minimized by installing a purge section
 Filtration is required to protect against
dirt, damages and air pressure drop
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

increases- optimum operation

 Capacity control : Rotation speed /


damper
Advantages Disadvantages
 Side-by-side duct
 Better than run-around coils
arrangement
 Only a small motor is
 Large space is required
required
 Cross-contamination is
 Both sensible and latent
possible
heat recovery are possible
 Exhaust fan must be
 Good heat recovery
oversized when using a
 sensible heat : 60% - purge section
70%
 Perfect sealing is
 latent heat : 20% - 50% impossible
 wide range of recovery
temp.  Frost may form on the
wheel during cold season
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

 Vendor software
energy-recovery technologies
Performance Standard
 For USA market - ARI 1060
 Enthalpy wheels / Heat Pipes /fixed-plate heat
exchangers
 Exclude coil loops - Covered under ARI 410
 Performance Rating based on :
 Effectiveness @ equal airflow
 Air pressure drop
 Air leakage rate

 For Asia market - No requirements


© 2004 American Standard Inc.
energy-recovery technologies
Insights and Ideas

Sensible-energy recovery
 Permits a limited reduction in plant size
 Best value:  coil loops
 fixed-plate heat exchangers

 Total-energy recovery
 Economic justification can hinge on large
plant-size reductions

 Best value:  total-energy wheels


© 2004 American Standard Inc.
Air-to-air energy recovery
• Why is airside energy recovery important
• Concept of Air-to-air energy recovery
• Technologies / Hardware
• Sensible heat recovery
• Run around coil loop
• Heat Pipe
• Fixed plate heat exchanger
• Total heat recovery
• Energy Wheel
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

• Integrating into Systems


• Summary
© 2007 American Standard Inc.

Air-to-Air Energy Recovery

Integrating into Systems


outdoor-air preconditioning
VAV Mixed-Air System

bypass
EA dampers RA

total-energy space
cooling
wheel
coil

SA
OA bypass
heating
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

dampers space
coil EA
VAV terminal
units
annual operating hours
mode Singapore Beijing
1 2600 755

2 0 717

3 0 265

4 0 264

5 0 599

humidity ratio
6 0 0 1
full recovery
2600 1618
RA
2
partial recovery
No recovery, Economizer: no
3economizer recovery, partial
only cooling
6 5 4
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

Tcritical SADB dry-bulb temperature


mixed-air system • variable volume
Using control to maximize the energy recovery
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

Control Architecture For Mixed Air VAV System


Summary :
Points for Consideration

 Supply Air Tempering

 Outdoor Air Preconditioning

 Capital Cost

 Running Cost

 Payback Period

 Internal Rate of Return


© 2004 American Standard Inc.

Trace700 and System Analyzer will tell


you the answer
Capital Costs Running Costs
Increase Increase
 Design cost
 Fan power
 Equipment cost
 Pump power
 Plant room space
 Inspection,
 Controls maintenance and
cleaning
 Installation cost

 Commissioning and
testing
Decrease Decrease
Ventilation plant size Energy used to
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

 
(possible) heat/cool,
humidify/dehumidify
 Refrigeration plant size
fresh air
(possible)
Other Economic Considerations

 Occupancy period

 Fresh air amount

 Temperature of supply fresh air

 Typical outdoor temperatures

 Cost of fuel
© 2004 American Standard Inc.
Air To Air Energy Recovery Options Comparison
Type Coil Loop Fixed Plate Heat Pipe Heat Wheel
Airflow L/s 50 and Up 25 and up 50 and up 25 and up
Heat Sensible Sensible Sensible Sensible(50-
Transfer ( 30-65%) (40-80%) (40-65%) 80%)
Total(55-85%)
Air Pressure 100 ~ 500 25~400 100~500 100~200
drop,Pa
Leakage 0% 0~5% 0% 1~10%
Heat Rate 3 way By pass Difficult By pass
control water valve damper damper, Speed
ctrl.
Lead time Std cycle 10 weeks 12 weeks 12 weeks
1st cost per Low High Very High Low &
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

energy saved Attractive


Relative 1.0 2~3X 2~3X 2~4 X
Cost
Where are the market potentials?

 System that uses >30% OA(fresh air)


 Sport arena
 Ballroom
 Exhibition hall
 Hospital OT room

 Extreme weather-MAIR
© 2004 American Standard Inc.
Resources
 Applications Manual - Air to Air Energy
Recovery in HVAC Systems

 Engineers Newsletter - Air to Air Energy


Recovery

 ASHRAE Handbook

 ASHRAE Journals, Transactions, BSRIA,


etc

 Engineers Newsletter Live


© 2004 American Standard Inc.
Question ?
© 2004 American Standard Inc.

You might also like