You are on page 1of 7

An in vitro study of certain properties

of a glass ionomer cement

Alfonso Maldonado, DD S, M SD p o rte d .6,7 I f the c e m e n t b o n d s to to o th stru c tu re


an d if th e bond is m ain tain ed indefinitely, th en its
Marjorie L. Swartz, M S
p o ten tia l to inhibit m icro leak ag e is o b v io u s. T h a t
Ralph W. Phillips, M S, DSc, Ind ian ap o lis th e m ate ria l c o n ta in s flu o rid e ,4 as d o e s silicate
ce m e n t p o w d e r, su g g ests po ssib le an ticario g en ic
A glass io n o m e r ce m e n t w as tested fo r its release of p ro p e rtie s .8
flu o rid e, e ffe c t on so lub ility o f en am el, b on d to T h e se fa c to rs a re th e su b je c t o f th is in v estig a­
en am el, and a b ility to seal th e cavity. It w as c o m p a ­ tion.
rable to silicate c e m e n t in its release of flu o rid e and
its e ffe c t on so lub ility of en am el. T h e stren gth of the
bond of th e ce m e n t to to oth stru c tu re w as s im ila r to Methods and materials
p o lyc arb o xy la te cem ent, and it ap p ea red to b e q uite
effective in sealing cavities. A co m m ercial glass io n o m e r c e m e n t w as u se d in
th e study. T h e b e h a v io r o f th e c e m e n t in its re ­
lease o f fluoride a n d th e re su ltin g effect on acid
en am el solubility w a s c o m p a re d to th a t o f a sili­
T h e g la ss io n o m e r c e m e n t d e v e lo p e d b y W ilson c a te c em e n t. T h e b o n d o f th e glass io n o m e r c e ­
an d K e n t an d o th e rs is a h y b rid o f silicate and m en t to to o th stru c tu re w as like th a t o f a p o ly c a r­
p o ly c a rb o x y la te c e m e n ts .1'5 A c c o rd in g to th e se b o x y la te cem e n t. T h e p ro d u cts u se d are listed in
in v e stig a to rs, th e p o w d e r is a n io n -leach ab le glass T ab le 1. T h e p o w d er-liq u id ra tio s (T able 1) and
p re p a re d w ith a flu o rid e flux sim ilar to silicate m an ip u lativ e p ro c e d u re s used fo r all m a teria ls
p o w d e r. B asically , th e liquid is an a q u e o u s so lu ­ w ere th o se re c o m m en d ed by th e re sp e c tiv e m an ­
tio n o f p o ly a c ry lic acid an alo g o u s to p o ly c a rb o x y ­ u fa c tu re rs. A ll m ixing and specim en p re p a ra tio n s
late liquid. A v a rie ty o f ap p lic a tio n s h a v e b een
su g g ested fo r th is m aterial, including re s to ra tio n
Table 1 ■ Ratios of powder-liquid recommended by man­
o f e ro d e d a re a s in th e ce rv ic a l reg io n , sm all C lass ufacturer.
I I I c a v itie s, a n d p its an d fissu res.
Cement Brand Powder/liquid
T h e o re tic a lly , th e glass io n o m er c e m e n t should
p o sse ss c e rta in d esirab le c h a ra c te ristic s o f b o th Glass ionomer ASPA* 3 .0 gm/1 ml
Silicate M .Q .t 1.5 gm /0.4 ml
silicate a n d p o ly c a rb o x y la te c e m e n ts. F o r e x am ­ Polycarboxylate D ureioni 1.5 gm/l gm
p le , th e c e m e n t sh o u ld a d h e re to to o th stru c tu re ,
'A m algam ated D ental C o., London, England
as d o e s p o ly c a rb o x y la te c e m e n t; a p p re c iab le tS .S . W hite Co., Philadelphia, Pa 19102
b o n d in g to b o th e n am el an d d en tin h a s b e e n re ­ ♦Prem ier D ental Products Co., Philadelphia, Pa 19107

JADA, Vol. 96, M ay 1978 ■ 785


w ere perform ed in a constant-tem perature room solution th at had a pH o f 4. C alcium was analyzed
held at 21 ± 1 C . T he tests to determ ine the by atom ic absorption spectrophotom etry. A fter
available fluoride,9-10 effect on solubility of décalcification, the teeth were rebuffed to rem ove
enam el,10' 11 bond to tooth stru ctu re ,12 and seal of all traces o f the etch, and the cem ent was applied
the cav ity 13 are those used in previous studies by to the facial surfaces. T he teeth w ere placed in a
this laboratory; thus, they will only be briefly hum idor while the cem ent set and then stored in
described. individual test tubes o f fluoride-free w ater. T he
w ater w as changed every day.
■ A vailable fluoride: T he am ount and rate o f A t the end o f 15 days, the cem ent w as rem oved
fluoride release w ere determ ined by m easuring and the teeth w ere lightly buffed with the levi­
the am ount o f fluoride leached during 21 days gated alum ina to rem ove any rem nants o f cem ent.
from seven disks o f glass ionom er cem ent, 9.5 mm T he crow ns w ere resealed to expose the same
in diam eter and 2.5 mm thick. Im m ediately after area of enam el as before. T he exposed enamel
preparation, the specim ens with their surfaces was decalcified and the calcium was determ ined.
protected by glass plates w ere stored in a hum idor T he effect o f the cem ent on enam el was based on
at 37 C for an hour. O n rem oval from the hum idor, the percent change in calcium dissolved from each
the specim ens w ere suspended by stainless steel tooth before and after contact with the cem ent.
w ires in 3 ml o f fluoride-free distilled w ater. E very T hus, each tooth served as its own control. F o r
24 hours, the specim ens w ere rinsed with 1 ml of com parison, 28 teeth w ere tested with silicate ce­
w ater and transferred to fresh storage m ediums. m ent. In addition, 14 teeth to which no cem ent
E ach d ay ’s storage m edium s, along with the rins­ was applied w ere treated in the same m anner.
ings, w ere analyzed for fluoride by use o f fluoride
ion-sensitive electrodes. ■ B ond to enam el and dentin: Bond strength was
T he am ount and pattern o f fluoride leached evaluated by the ability o f the cem ent-tooth inter­
from the glass ionom er cem ent specim ens were face to resist rupture when loaded in tension.
com pared to that released from a com parable Since the m aterial was being evaluated for its use
num ber o f silicate cem ent specim ens tested in the as a restorative m aterial, the test chosen was one
same m anner. that m ade use o f a bulk of m aterial.12 T h e facial
surfaces o f bovine incisors w ere ground on a w et,
■ E nam el solubility: Tw enty-eight sound, ex­ 400-grit, silicon-carbide paper m ounted on a
tracted central incisors that had never been per­ metallurgical grinder to produce a flat area of
m itted to dehydrate w ere used. T he crow ns were enam el or dentin approxim ately 1 cm in diam eter.
buffed with a slurry o f levigated alum ina to reduce T he roots w ere rem oved, and the crow ns
surface irregularities. T he roots w ere rem oved m ounted in cold-curing acrylic resin to expose the
and, except for a circle of enam el 3.5 mm in diam ­ flattened area. Im m ediately before preparation of
eter on the facial surfaces, the crow ns w ere cov­ the specim en, the flat area on the tooth was
ered with wax and electrical tape. T he initial solu­ ground by hand with w et, 600-grit paper. T he sur­
bility o f each tooth was m easured by determ ining face was w ashed and dried with com pressed air,
the calcium dissolved from the exposed area d ur­ and the citric acid conditioner was applied for 30
ing 30 m inutes’ im m ersion in 10 ml o f acetic acid seconds. T he surface was rinsed and dried.

TH E A U THO RS

Dr. M aldo nado is a t th e D ental School, C entral University


of V enezuela, in Caracas, Dr. S w artz is professor of dental
m aterials, and Dr. Phillips is associate dean fo r research
and research professor of dental m aterials at Indiana Uni­
versity School of Dentistry, 1121 W M ichigan St, In­
dianapolis, 4 6202. Address requests for reprints to Dr. Phil­
lips.

M A LD ON AD O SW ARTZ PH ILLIPS

786 ■ JADA, Vol. 96, May 1978


A split silicone ring w ith an in sid e d ia m e te r o f 7 and a p rev io u sly a d a p te d cerv ica l m atrix w as
m m w as p la c e d on th e su rfa c e o f th e to o th to form applied. T e n m in u te s la te r, th e m atrix w as re ­
a ca v ity to receiv e th e m aterial. A b ra s s ring w as m o v e d , th e ex c e ss m aterial w as trim m ed , and the
slip p ed o v e r th e o u tsid e o f th e silicone ring to su rface o f the re sto ra tio n w as c o a te d w ith the
m ain tain its d im en sio n s d u rin g in se rtio n o f the ca v ity varn ish . T h e re sto re d teeth w ere sto re d in a
m aterial. A fte r th e silicone ring w as filled b y the h u m id o r at 37 C fo r an ad d itio n al 50 m in u tes a fte r
c e m e n t, c e m e n t w as also p la c e d in a ca v ity c u t in a w hich th ey w e re im m ersed in w a te r and p laced in
ball bearin g . T h is w as p o sitio n e d on to p o f the a c o n sta n t-te m p e ra tu re ov en a t 37 C . T w en ty -
silicone ring so th a t th e p o rtio n s o f c e m e n t w ould fo u r h o u rs la te r, th e final finish o f th e re sto ra tio n
c o h e re . (T h e b earin g se rv e d to a tta c h th e sp e c i­ w as p e rfo rm ed . T h e te e th w e re sto re d a t 37 C fo r
m en s to th e g rip s o f th e te stin g m ach in e.) F iv e an ad d itio n al 14 d ay s. S ev en o f th e te e th w ere
m in u tes fro m th e s ta rt o f th e m ix , th e co m p leted su b jec ted to 2,500 th e rm o cy cle s a t th e 40 C te m ­
sp ecim en s w e re p la c e d in a h u m id o r w h e re th ey p e ra tu re differential.
rem ain ed fo r 55 m in u tes. T h e silico n e ring w as Sealing w as b ased o n th e ability o f th e re s to ra ­
th e n rem o v e d an d th e p e rip h e ry o f th e cem en t- tio n s to p rec lu d e th e p assag e o f 45C a ++ a t the
to o th in te rfa c e w as p a in te d w ith th e c a v ity v ar­ m argins an d along th e to o th -re sto ra tio n in terfa ce.
nish re c o m m e n d e d b y th e m a n u fa c tu rer.* T h e T h e ro o ts and c ro w n s w ere sealed w ith a c o m b i­
sp ecim en s w e re im m ersed in w a te r a t 37 C fo r 15 n atio n o f tinfoil an d nail po lish to e x p o se only th e
d ay s. F o r ty en am el an d 40 d en tin sp e c im e n s w ere re sto ra tio n and the su rro u n d in g a re a . T h e im m er­
p re p a re d . D u rin g th is in te rv a l, 20 sp ecim en s o f sion tim e in th e iso to p e so lu tio n , w h ich c o n tain e d
e a c h en am el an d d e n tin w e re su b je c te d to 2,500 0.1 m C i 4SC a ++/m l, w as tw o h o u rs. T h e p H o f the
th e rm o c y c le s a t a 40 C te m p e ra tu re differen tial. solution w as 6. P e n e tra tio n o f th e iso to p e w as
T w o te m p e ra tu re b a th s , o n e a t 5 C an d th e o th e r fo u n d by sectio n in g th e te e th longitudinally and
a t 45 C , w ere u sed fo r th is p u rp o se . T h e tim e placing th e sec tio n s on X -ra y film fo r p ro d u ctio n
sp e n t in ea c h b a th w a s 30 se c o n d s. S p ecim ens o f th e a u to ra d io g ra p h s.
w ere lo ad ed in te n sio n to failu re using a c ro ssh e a d C lass I I I cav ities w ere p re p a re d in 14 te e th and
sp eed o f 0.03 in/m in. re sto re d w ith th e g lass io n o m e r ce m en t. T h e re ­
A n eq u al n u m b e r o f sp ecim en s w e re p re p a re d sto rativ e te c h n iq u e s and te s t p ro c e d u re s w e re the
w ith th e p o ly c a rb o x y la te c e m e n t an d u n d e rw e n t sam e a s th o se d escrib ed p rev io u sly .
th e sam e te s t p ro c e d u re s.

■ S e a l i n g a b i l i t y : F o u rte e n e x tra c te d te e th w ith Results


e ro d e d a re a s in th e ce rv ic a l reg io n w e re re sto re d
w ith th e glass io n o m e r c e m e n t. N o ca v ity p re p ­
a ra tio n w as m ad e. T h e a re a s w e re p u m iced , ■ A v a i l a b l e f l u o r i d e : T h e fluoride re le a se during
rin se d , d ried w ith c o m p re sse d a ir, an d tre a te d 21 d a y s fro m b o th th e glass io n o m e r an d silicate
w ith th e citric acid so lu tio n as d ire c te d b y the ce m e n t is show n in F ig 1. W ith b o th m ate rials, th e
m a n u fa c tu rer. A fte r th e a re a w as again rin se d and g re a te st re le a se o c c u rre d during th e first few
d rie d , th e c e m e n t w as p laced in th e e ro d e d a re a d ay s, a fte r w hich th e a m o u n t dim in ish ed and

Fig 1 ■ A verage am o unt of flu oride leached into


w a te r each day from glass io nom er and silicate ce­
m ent specim ens.

Time (days)

M aldo nado— Sw artz— Phillips: G LA S S IO N O M ER C E M E N T S ■ 787


T a b le 2 ■ C o m p a riso n o f flu o rid e release data th ro u g h No S ilic a te Glass
re su lts o f analysis o f variance. 20 Cem ent Cem ent Io n o m e r
Cem ent
Non-cumulative data (F released each day)
Source of variation df MS F P i0
Between cements 1 262850 44.46 <001 +
Between specimens of cement 14 5912 0
Between days 20 98016 56.02 <.001
Cement-by-day interaction 20 15672 8.96 <.001
UJ
10
Specimens of cement by day 280 1750 0
Total 335
1 20 -
o
Cumulative data (total F release) * 30 -

Source of variation df MS F P
Between cements 1 55547814 35.44 <.001 40 - --------------

Between specimens of cement 14 1567528


Between days 20 738090 8.63 <.001 50 - _________

Cement-by-day interaction 20 249424 2.94 <.001


Specimen of cement by day 280 60 -
Total 335
Fig 2 ■ E ffect on so lu b ility of enamel in acetic acid as
influenced by tw o weeks’ contact w ith glass ionom er and
th e re a fte r rem ain ed nearly c o n s ta n t. D u rin g the s ilicate cements.
21 d ay s, a to tal o f 710 ¡ x g o f flu o rid e w as leached
from th e silicate c e m e n t, a n d 1,800 ¡jlg w as re ­
leased by th e glass io n o m er c e m e n t. A factorial ■ B o n d s t r e n g t h : T h e re su lts o f te sts c o n d u cte d
an aly sis o f v a ria n c e 14 w as p e rfo rm e d w hich indi­ to ev alu ate th e bond o f a glass io n o m er cem en t to
c a te d a highly significant d ifferen ce ( P C .001) both enam el and d entin co m p ared to th at o f poly car-
in the am o u n t o f fluoride re le a se d each d a y and b o x y late c e m e n t are p re se n te d in F igure 3. T h e
th e to tal am o u n t released b y th e tw o m aterials average valu es o f 360 psi fo r glass ionom er-
(T ab le 2). F o r s te n 15 also re p o rte d g re a te r fluoride enam el sp ecim en s and 415 psi fo r poly carb o x y -
re lease from glass io n o m er c e m e n t th a n from sili­ late-enam el sp ecim ens n o t su b jected to therm al
c a te cem en t. cycling do not dep ict the tru e stren g th o f the bond
o f e ith e r ce m en t. In both te st g ro u p s, 90% o f the
■ E n a m e l s o l u b i l i t y : T h e e ffect o f th e glass failures w ere classified as co h esiv e failure o f the
io n o m er cem e n t on th e solubility o f in ta c t enam el ce m en ts; the rem aining 10% w ere o f the
is c o m p a re d to th a t o f silicate c e m e n t in F ig ure 2. co h esiv e-ad h esiv e ty p e s o f failure— th a t is, som e
T h e av erag e differen ce in th e am o u n t o f calcium o f the cem e n t rem ained a tta c h e d to the to o th su r­
d isso lv ed in the first and seco n d d écalcificatio n o f face. T h u s, the d a ta a re p ro b ab ly m ore indicative
u n tre a te d te e th w as 2.1% . T h e solubility o f o f the ten sile stren g th o f the c em en ts th an o f the
enam el in a p p o sitio n to a g lass io n o m er cem en t actu al stre n g th o f the e n am e l-c em en t bond.
w as re d u c e d 52% co m p ared to silicate c e m e n t in T h erm al cycling had no a p p reciab le effect on the
w hich th e solubility w as re d u c e d by ap p ro x i­ bond o f th e glass io n o m er c em en t to enam el.
m ately 39% . A S tu d e n t’s t te s t sh o w ed th a t the E ighty p e rc e n t o f th e failures again w ere o f a
tw o m aterials differed sig nificantly (/, < .0 2 ) in co h esiv e n a tu re . T h erm al cycling red u c ed the
th e ir effect on enam el acid solubility. bond stren g th o f the p o ly c arb o x y la te c em en t by

□ 37° C
500 - ® Therm al Cycled

400 -

^ 300 -
Q_ Fig 3 ■ Average bond strength of glass ionom er

200 -

100 -

0
Enamel D entin
Glass Ionom er Cem ent
Enamel
lui D entin
Polycarboxylate Cem ent
and polycarboxylate cem ent to bovine enamel
and dentin (straight lines in center of bars repre­
sent standard deviation).

788 ■ JADA, Vol. 96, May 1978


a p p ro x im a te ly 25% w ith only 35% o f th e sp e ci­
m ens failing in co h esio n . T h e rem ain in g 65%
failed e ith e r in a d h e sio n o r p artially in ad h esio n .
In b o th c e m e n ts, th e stre n g th o f th e b o n d to
den tin w as lo w er th a n it w as to en am el. F o r d e n ­
tin, th e a v erag e v alu es fo r u n cy cled sp ecim en s
w ere 235 psi fo r th e g lass io n o m er cem e n t an d 305
psi fo r th e p o ly c a rb o x y la te c e m e n t. T h e rm a l c y ­
cling re d u c e d th e a v erag e stre n g th o f th e glass
io n o m er ce m e n t-d e n tin b o n d to ap p ro x im ately
130 psi an d th a t o f p o ly c a rb o x y la te c e m e n t to 120
psi. T h re e sp ecim en s o f each c e m e n t failed during
cycling. S ev en ty -fiv e p e rc e n t o f th e failures
am ong p o ly c a rb o x y la te sp ecim en s w ere o f an
ad h esiv e n a tu re .
T h e n a tu re o f th e ad h esiv e failu re o f th e glass
io n o m er c e m e n t to d en tin w as d ifferen t from th a t
w hich o c c u rre d o n en am el. T h e la tte r w ere
clearly co h e siv e b re a k s w ith th ic k lay ers o f hard
c em e n t ad h erin g to th e en am el su rfa c e (F ig 4). In
d en tin , a v ery thin la y e r rem ain ed th a t a p p e a red
to be c o m p o sed o f ev en ly d isp e rse d p a rtic le s (Fig Fig 5 ■ Fractured glass io nom er cem ent-dentin specim en show­

5). T h e co atin g w as soft an d easily d isp laced by ing thin layer of cem ent particles retained on dentin surface (origi­
nal m agnification x 1 1 ).
gentle scrap in g . T e s ts w ere re p e a te d w ith an ad d i­
tion al 40 sp ecim en s o f en am el and d en tin to
ex am in e fu rth e r th e n a tu re o f th e failu res. T h e T h e d a ta w ere a n aly zed by an aly sis o f v ariance
sam e re su lts w ere o b tain ed in b o th b o n d stren g th (T able 3), and th e N e u m a n K e u l’s sequential
valu es an d p re se n c e o f th e c o a tin g on th e d en tin range te s t14 w as applied to te s t fo r individual dif­
su rface. H o tz an d o th e rs 6 and J e n k in s 7 h av e re ­ fe re n ce b etw e en tre a tm e n ts fo r each c em en t (T a ­
p o rte d lo w er v alu es fo r th e b o n d to d en tin th a n to b les 4 ,5 ). T h e a d h esio n o f b o th c em en ts to enam el
enam el an d th e failu res on en am el as co h e siv e and w h en u n cy cled differed from th e a d h esio n to d e n ­
th o se o n d en tin as ad h e siv e -c o h esiv e. tin a t P < .0 5 . T h e ad h e sio n v alu e s fo r u n cy cled
and c y cled p o ly c arb o x y late c e m e n t to enam el
w ere also d ifferen t a tP < .0 5 . T h e rm a l cycling had
no significant effect on the glass ionom er-enam ei
b o n d , b u t significantly red u ced th e bond o f both
cem e n ts to d en tin (P < .0 5 ). T h e rm o c y c led poly-
c arb o x y la te -d e n tin and p o ly carb o x y la te-en am -

T a b le 3 ■ S ta tis tic a l c o m p a r is o n o f b o n d s tr e n g th d a ta
t h r o u g h r e s u lts o f a n a ly s is o f v a r ia n c e .
_______ S ource of variation__________ d f MS F______ P_
Between cem ents 1 10,595
Between treatm ents 3 485,860 4.29 P <.01
C em ent-by-treatm ent interaction 3 32,970
W ithin cells 152 7,294
Total 159

T a b le 4 ■ R e s u lt s o f N e u m a n K e u l’s t e s t c o m p a r in g b o n d
s tr e n g th s o f g la s s io n o m e r c e m e n t.
Dentin cycled Dentin 37 C Enam el cycled
Enam el 37 C 2 2 6 .2 5 ' 124.15* 12.05 NS
Enam el cycled 214.20* 122.10*
Dentin 37 C 102.10*
Fig 4 ■ Fractured glass ionom er-enam ei specim en show ing cohe­
'S ig n ific a n t at P < .0 5
sive failu re of cem ent (original m ag nificatio n x 1 0 ). NS— not significant

M aldonado— Sw artz— Phillips: G LASS IO N O M ER C E M E N T S ■ 789


T a b le 5 ■ R e s u lts o f N e u m a n K e u l's te s t c o m p a r in g b o n d
re sto ra tio n s w h ere e ro d ed cerv ical are a s w ere re ­
s tr e n g th s o f p o ly c a r b o x y la te c e m e n t.
sto re d w ith o u t use o f a cav ity p re p a ra tio n .
Dentin cycled Enam el cycled Dentin 37 C
Enam el 37 C 292.80* 119.95* 109.60*
Dentin 37 C 183.20* 10.35 NS
Enam el cycled 172.79*

"Significant at P < .0 5 Discussion and summary


NS— not significant

T h e d a ta on rele ase o f fluoride and solubility o f


el sp ecim en s w ere n o t sig nificantly d ifferen t, enam el in dicate th a t the glass io n o m er cem en t
w h e re a s a significant d ifferen ce ( P < .0 5 ) ex isted should be as effective as silicate c em en t in in h ib it­
b e tw e e n glass io n o m er-en am ei an d io n o m er-den- ing sec o n d ary caries. In a d d itio n , th e glass
tin sp ecim en s th a t w ere th e rm o c y c le d . io n o m er c em en t b o n d s to b o th enam el an d d entin
b u t, a s w ith p o ly c arb o x y late ce m e n t, th e bond is
■ S e a l i n g a b i l i t y : A u to ra d io g ra p h s re p re se n ta ­ stro n g er to enam el th a n it is to den tin . A lthough
tive o f th e d e g re e s o f leak ag e o ccu rrin g w ith the the te st perio d w as sh o rt, th e glass ionom er-
re sto ra tio n s u n d e r th e tw o te s t c o n d itio n s are c em en t re sto ra tio n s ap p e a re d to effectively seal
sh o w n in F ig u re 6. A b lack line originating at the C lass II I cav ities ev en w hen th e re sto re d te e th
m argin an d p ro g ressin g alo n g th e to o th -re sto ra - w ere su b jec ted to th erm o cy clin g . A good seal o f
tio n in terface in d icates iso to p e p e n e tra tio n . C lass V cav ities w as ac h iev e d e v en w h e re the
Iso to p e p e n e tra tio n co u ld n o t b e d e te c te d in C lass m argins w ere b o rd ered w holly o r p a rtia lly by
III re sto ra tio n s, cy cled o r u n c y c le d , an d no a p ­ ce m en tu m o r den tin . It a p p ea rs th a t th is c em en t
p reciab le leakage w as n o ted am ong th e C lass V sy stem h as ad v a n tag e s o v e r re sto ra tiv e resin s.

CLASS III RESTORATIONS

€ Fig 6 ■ A utoradiographs representative of


leakage patterns observed in Class III and Class
V restorations of glass ionom er cem ent in ex­
tracted teeth stored at 37 C and therm al cycled.

37 C CYCLED

CLASS V RESTORATIONS

t «
790 ■ JADA, Vol. 96, May 1978
H o w e v e r, b e fo re th e sp ecific ap p licatio n s o f th e 4. Crisp, S ., and W ilson, A.D. R eactions in glass io nom er ce­
ments: decom position of th e pow der. J Dent Res 53:1408 Nov-Dee
glass io n o m e r can be d e lin e a te d , a n u m b e r o f
1974.
thin g s m u st be c o n sid e re d . T h e m a te ria l is so m e ­ 5. Crisp, S., and W ilson, A.D. R eactions in glass io nom er ce­
w h a t o p a q u e ,16 a n d th is co u ld lim it th e sco p e o f ments. The precipitation reaction. J D ent Res 53:1420 N o v -D p c
1974.
ap p licatio n s. A lth o u g h M c L e a n and W ilso n 17
6. Hotz, P., and others. Th e bonding of glass io nom er cem ents to
sta te th a t th e c e m e n t a p p e a rs to be ab ra sio n re sis­ m etal and too th substrates. Br Dent J 142:41 Jan 18, 1977,
ta n t clinically w h e n u se d as a p it an d fissu re seal­ 7. Jenkins, C.B. A com parison of bond strength of glass ionom er
cem ents and an acid etch resin system, abstracted. J Dent Res
a n t o r filling, m o re w o rk n e e d s to b e d o n e to
55:D 134 O ct 1976.
con firm th is. 8. Crisp, S.; Lewis, B.G.; and W ilson, A.D. Glass io nom er ce­
ments: chem istry of erosion. J D ent Res 55:1 0 3 2 N ov-Dee 1976.
9. N orm an, R .D ., and others. A dditional studies on flu oride up­
T h e authors ackn ow led ge th e assistance of B arbara R hodes and take by enam el from certain dental m aterials. J D ent Res 40:529
H azel C lark in conducting th e tests, and the assistance of Dr. M ay-June 1961.
Rosario P otter in th e statistical analysis of th e data. 10. S w artz, M .L ., and others. A ddition o f flu oride to pit and fis­
sure sealants. A feasibility study. J Dent Res 55:757 S ept-O ct 1977.
Portions o f this research are taken from a thesis by Dr. M a l­ 11. Phillips, R .W ., and Sw artz, M .L . E ffect of certain restorative
donado in partial fulfillm ent fo r the M S D degree. T h is paper was m aterials on solubility of enam el. JADA 54:623 M ay 1957.
presented a t the annu al m eetin g of th e A m erican Association for 12. Phillips, R.W .; Sw artz, M.L.; and Rhodes, B.F. An evaluation
D ental Research, Las Vegas, June 1977. of a carboxylate adhesive cem ent. JADA 8 1 :1353 D ec 1970.
13. S w artz, M .L ., and Phillips, R.W. In vitro studies on m arginal
* Detrey’s Special Cavity Varnish, A m alg am ated D ental, London, leakage of restorative m aterials. JADA 62:141 Feb 1961.
E ngland. 14. W iner, B.J. Statistical principles in exp erim ental design. New
Y ork, M cG raw -H ill, 1962, chap 3, 5.
1. W ilson, A.D., and Kent, B.E. T h e glass ionom er cem ent, a new 15. Forsten, L. Fluoride release from a glass ionom er cem ent.
translucent dental fillin g m aterial. J A ppl C hem Biotech 21:313, Scand J D ent Res 85:509, 1977.
1971. 16. M cLean, J.W ., and W ilson, A.D. T h e clinical developm ent of
2. W ilson, A.D., and Kent, B.E. A new tran slucent cem ent for glass ionom er cem ents. Form ulations and properties. Aust D ent J
dentistry. T h e glass io nom er cem ent. Br Dent J 132:133 Feb 15, 22:31 Feb 1977.
1972. 17. M cLean, J.W ., and W ilson, A.D. Fissure sealing and filling
3. Kent, B.E.; Lewis, B.G.; and W ilson, A.D. The properties of a w ith an adhesive glass ionom er cem ent. Br Dent J 136:269 April 2,
glass io nom er cem ent. Br D ent J 135:322 Oct 2, 1973. 1974.

M aldonado— Sw artz— Phillips: G LASS IO N O M E R C E M E N T S ■ 791

You might also like