Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GROUP NO. 10
Questions 1, 2 and 3
Questions 4
TM 195
Marit
al
Age Gender Education Status Usage Fitness Income Miles
46418.0
Mean 28.55 1.5 15.0375 1.6 3.0875 2.9625 3 82.7875
Standard 0.80738 0.05625 0.055 0.07429 1014.70 3.22822
Error 3 4 0.1359958 1 0.0875 8 3 3
Median 26 1.5 16 2 3 3 46617 85
Mode 23 2 16 2 3 3 46617 85
Standard
Deviatio 7.22145 0.50315 1.21638341 0.78262 9075.78
n 2 5 3 0.493 4 0.66454 3 28.8741
Sample 52.1493 0.25316 1.47958860 0.44161 8236984 833.713
Variance 7 5 8 0.243 0.6125 4 1 8
- -
- 0.34600901 1.874 - 1.90682 1.81937
Kurtosis 0.40665 2.05195 3 4 0.62054 7 -0.62131 7
- -
Skewnes 0.97882 2.88E- 0.20309437 0.416 0.30653 0.17662 1.00891
s 8 18 5 1 0.16913 4 1 3
Range 32 1 6 1 3 4 38658 150
Minimu
m 18 1 12 1 2 1 29562 38
Maximu
m 50 2 18 2 5 5 68220 188
Sum 2284 120 1203 128 247 237 3713442 6623
Count 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
TM 498
Marit
al
Age Gender Education Status Usage Fitness Income Miles
1.51666 15.1166666 3.06666 48973.6 87.9333
Mean 28.9 7 7 1.6 7 2.9 5 3
Standard 0.85789 0.06505 0.15783075 0.063 0.10324 0.08130 1117.22 4.29425
Error 8 8 2 8 3 3 5 2
Median 26 2 16 2 3 3 49459.5 85
Mode 25 2 16 2 3 3 45480 95
Standard
Deviatio 6.64524 0.50393 1.22255174 0.79971 8653.98 33.2631
n 8 9 5 0.494 7 0.62977 9 4
Sample 44.1593 0.25395 1.49463276 0.244 0.63954 7489153 1106.43
Variance 2 5 8 1 8 0.39661 2 6
- -
- - 0.40904797 1.888 0.01316 0.73262 2.82756
Kurtosis 0.02038 2.06533 5 7 6 7 -0.32501 8
- -
Skewnes 0.71315 - 0.11475734 0.418 0.49487 - 1.09006
s 6 0.06843 8 8 4 0.34537 -0.01055 5
Range 29 1 6 1 3 3 35247 191
Minimu
m 19 1 12 1 2 1 31836 21
Maximu
m 48 2 18 2 5 4 67083 212
Sum 1734 91 907 96 184 174 2938419 5276
Count 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
TM798
Marit
al
Age Gender Education Status Usage Fitness Income Miles
75441.5
Mean 29.1 1.825 17.325 1.575 4.775 4.625 8 166.9
Standard 1.10232 0.06084 0.25915914 0.079 0.14973 0.10553 9.49735
Error 9 3 3 2 3 6 2926.03 5
Median 27 2 18 2 5 5 76568.5 160
Mode 25 2 18 2 4 5 90886 100
Standard 6.97173 0.38480 1.63906633 0.500 0.94699 0.66746 18505.8 60.0665
Deviatio 8 8 8 6 3 7 4 4
n
Sample 48.6051 0.14807 2.68653846 0.250 0.89679 0.44551 3.42E+0
Variance 3 7 2 6 5 3 8 3607.99
-
1.32484 1.22000 2.003 - 1.20486 1.82132
Kurtosis 3 3 0.45527877 4 0.22452 9 -1.45206 3
-
Skewnes 1.44846 - 0.40130338 0.315 0.66943 - 1.13403
s 7 1.77806 8 4 4 1.57422 -0.07965 3
Range 26 1 7 1 4 2 56025 280
Minimu
m 22 1 14 1 3 3 48556 80
Maximu
m 48 2 21 2 7 5 104581 360
Sum 1164 73 693 63 191 185 3017663 6676
Count 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
TM195
Total out of 180 users 44.44% use TM195 as their product.
Around 55 are in the age group 18-30.
Male and Female users are 50% each.
40 % of the people are singled.
More than one-third of the people use the vehicle more than thrice a week,
Students travel only 82 miles on average on the treadmill.
TM498
Total out of 180 users 33.33% use TM498 as their product.
Average age is around 25-30.
Male and Female users are almost 50% each.
TM798
Total out of 180 users 22.22% use TM798 as their product.
Age group similar to that of TM498.
More than 75% of these products are owned by males.
Conclusion:
Single users buy the equipment comparatively less than partnered users.
TM 195 is used by lower-income people and TM 798 is used by people with high income.
Miles travelled by a person on TM798 is thrice that of TM 498 and TM 798.
Customer base of TM 798 is mostly professionals and it can be understood by the fitness and
usage levels.
Product
TM195
2500
2000
1500
Sum of Usage
1000 Sum of Miles
Sum of Fitness
500
0
Partnered Single Partnered Single
Female Male
TM498
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000 Sum of Usage
Sum of Miles
3000
Sum of Fitness
2000
1000
0
TM798Partnered Single
Female
Partnered
Male
Single
Sum of Sum of
Row Labels Usage Fitness
Female 242 230
Partnered 148 141
Single 94 89
Male 380 366
Partnered 221 209
Single 159 157
Grand Total 622 596
8000
7000
6000
5000
2000
1000
0
Partnered Single Partnered Single
Female Male
ASSIGNMENT-3
P (Earthquake | Predict) =
0.95 x 0.2
0.95 x 0.2 + 0.1 x 0.8
0.19
0.27
P (Earthquake | Unpredicted) =
0.2 x 0.05
0.2 x 0.05 + 0.8 x 0.9
0.01
0.73
Analysis: Above calculations suggest that the probability of an earthquake occurring when the
geologist has predicted it already, is 70%. Whereas, the probability of an earthquake not occurring
when the geologist has predicted so, is 98%. Since geologists can provide predictions as to where a
nuclear plant has to be set, the company can certainly ensure that it will save capital costs on
nuclear power plant construction. Otherwise, the nuclear industry will suffer an even bigger loss.
Hence, from the above calculations, it can be concluded that we can hire the geologist.