STATISTICS ASSIGNMENT – 2&3

ASSIGNMENT 2-CARDIO GOOD FITNESS CLUB

Questions 1, 2 and 3

Categorical Discrete Continuous

 Product purchased  Mean number of times  Annual Household
the customer plans to income
use the treadmill
 Gender  Mean number of miles  Education
the customer expects
to walk/run
 Relationship  Age
 Self-rated fitness
(Ordinal)

Questions 4

TM 195
Marit
al
  Age Gender Education Status Usage Fitness Income Miles
46418.0
Mean 28.55 1.5 15.0375 1.6 3.0875 2.9625 3 82.7875
Standard 0.80738 0.05625 0.055 0.07429 1014.70 3.22822
Error 3 4 0.1359958 1 0.0875 8 3 3
Median 26 1.5 16 2 3 3 46617 85
Mode 23 2 16 2 3 3 46617 85
Standard
Deviatio 7.22145 0.50315 1.21638341 0.78262 9075.78
n 2 5 3 0.493 4 0.66454 3 28.8741
Sample 52.1493 0.25316 1.47958860 0.44161 8236984 833.713
Variance 7 5 8 0.243 0.6125 4 1 8
 - -
- 0.34600901 1.874 - 1.90682 1.81937
Kurtosis 0.40665 2.05195 3 4 0.62054 7 -0.62131 7
- -
Skewnes 0.97882 2.88E- 0.20309437 0.416 0.30653 0.17662 1.00891
s 8 18 5 1 0.16913 4 1 3
Range 32 1 6 1 3 4 38658 150
Minimu
m 18 1 12 1 2 1 29562 38
Maximu
m 50 2 18 2 5 5 68220 188
Sum 2284 120 1203 128 247 237 3713442 6623
Count 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80

TM 498
Marit
al
  Age Gender Education Status Usage Fitness Income Miles
1.51666 15.1166666 3.06666 48973.6 87.9333
Mean 28.9 7 7 1.6 7 2.9 5 3
Standard 0.85789 0.06505 0.15783075 0.063 0.10324 0.08130 1117.22 4.29425
Error 8 8 2 8 3 3 5 2
Median 26 2 16 2 3 3 49459.5 85
Mode 25 2 16 2 3 3 45480 95
Standard
Deviatio 6.64524 0.50393 1.22255174 0.79971 8653.98 33.2631
n 8 9 5 0.494 7 0.62977 9 4
Sample 44.1593 0.25395 1.49463276 0.244 0.63954 7489153 1106.43
Variance 2 5 8 1 8 0.39661 2 6
- -
- - 0.40904797 1.888 0.01316 0.73262 2.82756
Kurtosis 0.02038 2.06533 5 7 6 7 -0.32501 8
- -
Skewnes 0.71315 - 0.11475734 0.418 0.49487 - 1.09006
s 6 0.06843 8 8 4 0.34537 -0.01055 5
Range 29 1 6 1 3 3 35247 191
Minimu
m 19 1 12 1 2 1 31836 21
Maximu
m 48 2 18 2 5 4 67083 212
Sum 1734 91 907 96 184 174 2938419 5276
 Count 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60

TM798
Marit
al
  Age Gender Education Status Usage Fitness Income Miles
75441.5
Mean 29.1 1.825 17.325 1.575 4.775 4.625 8 166.9
Standard 1.10232 0.06084 0.25915914 0.079 0.14973 0.10553 9.49735
Error 9 3 3 2 3 6 2926.03 5
Median 27 2 18 2 5 5 76568.5 160
Mode 25 2 18 2 4 5 90886 100
Standard
Deviatio 6.97173 0.38480 1.63906633 0.500 0.94699 0.66746 18505.8 60.0665
n 8 8 8 6 3 7 4 4
Sample 48.6051 0.14807 2.68653846 0.250 0.89679 0.44551 3.42E+0
Variance 3 7 2 6 5 3 8 3607.99
-
1.32484 1.22000 2.003 - 1.20486 1.82132
Kurtosis 3 3 0.45527877 4 0.22452 9 -1.45206 3
-
Skewnes 1.44846 - 0.40130338 0.315 0.66943 - 1.13403
s 7 1.77806 8 4 4 1.57422 -0.07965 3
Range 26 1 7 1 4 2 56025 280
Minimu
m 22 1 14 1 3 3 48556 80
Maximu
m 48 2 21 2 7 5 104581 360
Sum 1164 73 693 63 191 185 3017663 6676
Count 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40

TM195
 Total out of 180 users 44.44% use TM195 as their product.
 Around 55 are in the age group 18-30.
 Male and Female users are 50% each.
 40 % of the people are singled.
 More than one-third of the people use the vehicle more than thrice a week,
 Students travel only 82 miles on average on the treadmill.
TM498
 Total out of 180 users 33.33% use TM498 as their product.
 Average age is around 25-30.
 Male and Female users are almost 50% each.

TM798
 Total out of 180 users 22.22% use TM798 as their product.
  Age group similar to that of TM498.
 More than 75% of these products are owned by males.

Conclusion:
 Single users buy the equipment comparatively less than partnered users.
 TM 195 is used by lower-income people and TM 798 is used by people with high income.
 Miles travelled by a person on TM798 is thrice that of TM 498 and TM 798.
 Customer base of TM 798 is mostly professionals and it can be understood by the fitness and
usage levels.

Product

TM195

Sum of Sum of Sum of

Row Labels Usage Miles Fitness
Female 116 3048 115
Partnered 77 2023 77
Single 39 1025 38
Male 131 3575 122
Partnered 69 1684 60
Single 62 1891 62
Grand Total 247 6623 237

2500

2000

1500
Sum of Usage
1000 Sum of Miles
Sum of Fitness
500
 Female Male

TM498

Sum Sum Sum

of of of
Usag Mile Fitne
Row Labels e s ss
684
Female 242 1 230
429
Partnered 148 3 141
254
Single 94 8 89
117
Male 380 34 366
686
Partnered 221 6 209
486
Single 159 8 157
185
Grand Total 622 75 596

8000
7000
6000
5000
4000 Sum of Usage
Sum of Miles
3000
Sum of Fitness
2000
1000
0
TM798Partnered Single
Female
Partnered
Male
Single

Sum of Sum of
Row Labels Usage Fitness
Female 242 230
Partnered 148 141
Single 94 89
Male 380 366
Partnered 221 209
Single 159 157
Grand Total 622 596

8000

7000

6000

5000

4000 Sum of Usage

Sum of Miles
3000 Sum of Fitness

2000

1000

0
Partnered Single Partnered Single
Female Male
ASSIGNMENT-3

Let P (Earthquake) = 0.2

P (No Earthquake) = 0.8

P (Predict | Earthquake) = 0.95

P (Unpredict | Earthquake) = 0.05

P (Predict | No Earthquake) = 0.9

P (Unpredict | No Earthquake) = 0.1

P (Earthquake | Predict) =

0.95 x 0.2
0.95 x 0.2 + 0.1 x 0.8

0.19
0.27

P (Earthquake | Predict) = 0.703 = 70.3%

P (No Earthquake | Predict) = 0.296 = 29.6%

P (Earthquake | Unpredicted) =

0.2 x 0.05
0.2 x 0.05 + 0.8 x 0.9

0.01
0.73

P (Earthquake | Unpredicted) = 0.013 = 1.3%

P (No Earthquake | Unpredicted) = 1 – 0.013 = 0.987 = 98.7%

Analysis: Above calculations suggest that the probability of an earthquake occurring when the
geologist has predicted it already, is 70%. Whereas, the probability of an earthquake not occurring
when the geologist has predicted so, is 98%. Since geologists can provide predictions as to where a
nuclear plant has to be set, the company can certainly ensure that it will save capital costs on
nuclear power plant construction. Otherwise, the nuclear industry will suffer an even bigger loss.
Hence, from the above calculations, it can be concluded that we can hire the geologist.