Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vibration
Vibration
q.
f re
h
hig
y
e nc
overall vibration tim qu
e q. fre
fre
low
Amplitude
1.0
(microns, Velocity (mm/sec)
mm/sec, g’s
0.1
Common Machinery
1 Operating Range
0.01
10 100 1,000 10,000
Frequency (Hz)
Multi-Parameter Monitoring
Same Data in Velocity and Acceleration
Velocity
Spectrum
On the same bearing cap,
low freq. events (imbalance,
misalignment, etc.) show
best in the velocity
spectrum; while high freq.
events (bearing faults,
gearmesh) show best in the
acceleration spectrum
Acceleration
Spectrum
Accelerometers
• Rugged Devices
• Operate in Wide Frequency
Range (Near 0 to above 40 kHz)
• Good High Frequency Response
• Some Models Suitable For High
Temperature
• Require Additional Electronics
(may be built into the sensor housing)
What is vibration?
Complex signal?
FFT Signal Processing
Amplitude
Ti
m
e
Amplitude
cy
Amplitude
n
ue
eq
Fr
Ti
m
e
Narrow Bands with trend
Sub-
H am
r o n ic 1X 2X B e a r in g B e a r in g G e a rs B e a r in g
Amplitude
1x 2x 10x
T re n d o f
T re n d o f
B e a r in g s
B a la n c e
.3
in /s e c A la r m
.1
T im e in /s e c T im e
(D a y s ) (D a y s )
Alarm Types – Narrow Bands
A2 - 8.2.4. BPFI Pomp PNV
P1/K10 -PNV POMP NIET-KOPP VERTIKAAL
14
Route Spectrum
30-jan-96 15:14:51
Imbalance
12 OVERALL= 13.52 V-DG
RMS = 13.46
LOAD = 100.0
RPM = 2987. (49.78 Hz)
10 Fault Limit
RMS Velocity in mm/Sec
8
Misalignment
6
Looseness
Bearing
2
0
Freq: 475.00
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Ordr: 9.542
Frequency in Hz Spec: .06356
Label: BPFI with 1xrPM modulations.
Overall Vibration
• The total vibration energy
measured within a specific
frequency range.
0
Freq: 1321.9
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Ordr: 26.55
Frequency in Hz Spec: .119
Label: BPFI with 1xrPM modulations.
Analyse of data: Spectra,
Waveform and Trends
Vibration
» -Imbalance
» -Misalignment
» -Looseness
» -Bearing problems
» -Belt problems
» -Gear problems
» -Lubrification
» -Electrical problems
» -Resonance
» -Sleeve Bearing problems
» -Other
Vibration analysis
Unbalance
COUPLE UNBALANCE
Misalignment/Bent shaft
ANGULAR
MISALIGNMENT
Mechanical looseness
MECHANICAL
LOOSENESS (A)
oil whirl
BELT FREQUENCY
HARMONICS
RADIAL
1X RPM
BELT RESONANCE
F1 F2
ZOOM
SPECTRUM
Electrical
ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS
STATOR ECCENTRICITY, SHORTED LAMINATIONS
AND LOOSE IRON
Gear
CALCULATION OF GEAR
MESH FREQUENCIES
51 TEETH
1700 RPM
31 TEETH 20 TEETH
8959 RPM
2625 rpm
8 teeth GMF= 21k CPM
1500 rpm
14 teeth
14 teeth
1500 rpm
TIME WAVEFORM
fHt = (GMF)Na
(TGEAR)(TPINION)
Inner Race
(BPFI)
Ball Spin
(BSF)
DB D1
gSE
ZONE A
ZONE B ZONE C ZONE D
gSE
gSE
2.1
0.30
1.8
0.24
1.5
0.18 1.2
0.9
0.12
0.6
0.06
0.3
0 0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Frequency in Hz Frequency in Hz
Singing Propeller
Describing the frequency spectra
LF PS 1 024
2.4
Route Spectrum
• Sideband activity around the 28-JUL-06 21:56:44
shaft.
0.9
Recommendation
Grinding an anti singing edge on the propeller.
Result: The grinding of the propeller blades were carried out and the singing tone
disappeared
Bearing damage
SF8000.182 645 AKSEL REIMHJUL 1. LAGER RADIELL SF8000.182 645 AKSEL REIMHJUL 1. LAGER RADIELL
1.0 1.0
Route Spectrum Route Spectrum
F F F F F F F F F F 10-MAY-05 12: 07: 36 E E E E E E E E E E 10-MAY-05 12: 07: 36
R M S Acceleration in G-s
F=BPFI : 5.44 E=BPFO : 3.56
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0 0
Ordr: 5.436 Ordr: 3.540
0 20 40 60 80 100 Freq: 266.08 0 20 40 60 80 100 Freq: 173.27
Frequency in Order Spec: .03517 Frequency in Order Spec: .01331
R M S Acceleration in G-s
>FAG 6322
3.0 0.6 F=BPFI : 5.44
2.5
2.0 0.4
1.5
1.0 0.2
0.5
0 0
Date: 10-MAY-05 Ordr: 5.433
0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time: 12: 07: 40 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Freq: 265.94
Days: 10-JAN-03 To 10-MAY-05 Ampl: 4.281 Frequency in Order Spec: .715
Label: WF 63 1RER-1 /
>SKF NU2224
1.5 E=BPFO : 299.6
1.2
0.9
FAULT
2
0.6
ALERT
1
0.3
0 0
Freq: 300.17 Date: 01-MAR-05
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Ordr: 6.869 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Time: 09:47:37
Frequency in Hz Spec: .00788 Days: 03-FEB-03 To 01-MAR-05 Ampl: 5.531
>TMK HH840210/249
RM S Acceleration in G-s
RM S Acceleration in G-s
1.8
E=BPFO : 256.5
5
1.5
1.2
3
0.9
2
0.6
1
0.3
0 0
Freq: 255.02 Date: 06-JUN-05
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Ordr: 10.17 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time: 21: 04: 15
Frequency in Hz Spec: .102 Days: 09-JAN-03 To 06-JUN-05 Ampl: 6.656
-- Baseline -- -- Baseline --
Value: .00000 Value: .00000
3.0 3.0
Date: 28-MAY-98 Date: 28-MAY-98
RMS Acc eleration in G-s
2.0 2.0
ALERT ALERT
1.5 1.5
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
0 0
Date: 09-JAN-02 Date: 03-JAN-05
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Time: 11:03:24 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Time: 14:04:35
Days: 09-JAN-02 To 03-JAN-05 Ampl: .340 Days: 09-JAN-02 To 03-JAN-05 Ampl: .551
-- Baseline --
Value: .00000
3.0
Date: 28-MAY-98
RMS Acc eleration in G-s
2.5
2.0
ALERT
1.5
Points of observed
1.0
damages on same type of
bearing
0.5
0
Date: 09-JAN-02
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Time: 11:03:24
Days: 09-JAN-02 To 03-JAN-05 Ampl: .340
>SKF NU1026
0.9
E=BPFO 4 ALERT
0.6
2
0.3
0 0
Freq: 247.50 Date: 03-NOV-*3
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 Ordr: 9.900 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Time: 14:37:54
Frequency in Hz Spec: 1.047 Days: 22-JAN-*2 To 03-NOV-*3 Ampl: 9.625
Acceleration in G-s
Plot
0.25 Span
4
07-OCT-03 13:09:16
0.20
-4
0.15 12-SEP-03 11:49:13
0.10
12-JUN-03 12:04:11
0.05
29-NOV-02 13:34:02
0
Freq: 25.19 Time: 32.15
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Ordr: 5.437 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Ampl: -.906
Frequency in Hz Spec: .02161 Time in mSecs
The resolution to the problem was therefore divided in two. First stage involved
redesigning and replacing the bolts with others with lower natural frequencies, and
thereafter to change the propeller curve so that we achieve a lower maximum
rpm and a lower maximum gearmesh. In addition to this we also achieved to obtain
the power by increasing the pitch curve.
BSC - Port-gear-1500hz BSC - Port-gear-1500hz
Port-HF -V05 VERTIKALT Port-HF -V05 VERTIKALT
10 18
Analyze Spectrum Analyze Spectrum
08-SEP-07 00:48:28 08-SEP-07 01:00:27
16
RMS = 8.38 RMS = 23.05
LOAD = 73.0 LOAD = 80.0
8 RPM = 1050. RPM = 1080.
RPS = 17.50 14 RPS = 18.00
12
6
10
8
4
4
2
0 0
Freq: 716.90 Freq: 735.77
0 400 800 1200 1600 Ordr: 40.97 0 400 800 1200 1600 Ordr: 40.88
Frequency in Hz Spec: 6.594 Frequency in Hz Spec: 13.37
The two engines is running at 1060 The two engines is running at 1080 rpm which
rpm which gives a gearmesh of 718 gives a gearmesh of 736 Hz with a amplitude
Hz with a amplitude of 6.7 mm/s. of 13.4 mm/s. An 2.5% increasement on the
This is normal gearmesh frequency doubles the amplitude,
and this clearly indicates a resonance problem
BSC - Port-gear-1500hz BSC - Port-gear-1500hz
Port-HF -V05 VERTIKALT Port-HF -V05 VERTIKALT
33 0.7
Analyze Spectrum Analyze Spectrum
08-SEP-07 01:41:06 16-SEP-07 10:04:08
30
RMS = 29.24 0.6 RMS = 2.59
LOAD = 86.0 LOAD = 15.0
27 RPM = 1100. RPM = 600.
RPS = 18.33 RPS = 10.00
24 0.5
RMS V eloc ity in mm/S ec
0.4
18
72 2.55
15
83 6.46
0.3
12
9 0.2
6
0.1
3
0 0
Freq: 753.53 Freq: 837.00
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 Ordr: 41.10 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Ordr: 83.70
Frequency in Hz Spec: 26.38 Frequency in Hz Spec: .220
The two engines is running at 1100 rpm The two engines is running at low and variable rpm
which gives a gearmesh of 753 Hz with a with 1st order gearmesh around 350-400 Hz. This gives
amplitude of 26.4 mm/s. An 5.8% a 2nd order gearmesh frequency in the are 700-850 Hz.
increasement on the gearmesh frequency Also the 2nd order is strongly amplified something
increases the amplitude four times, and this which confirms our assumption. This proves that there
definitely indicates a resonance problem is a resonance problem in this area (700-800Hz)
The measurement technique which were used her is called “rpm sweeping with peak-hold function” which
means that you sweep a frequency area to map possible resonance problems
Unbalanced flexible coupling
• Initial vibration analysis revealed
mechanical unbalance in the coupling.
• Unbalance is indicated by a dominating
1.st order frequency amplitude.
• Unbalance can have different reasons
– Insuficcient dynamic balancing.
– Coupling damages, as here where the stress
between the rubber elements and the inner
ring (steel) has excedeeded the force limits
and the rubber elements were damaged after
only a few months
Generator with a unbalanced/damaged coupling elements
1.orden
035 - GENERATOR 2
Gen 2 -P05 GENERATOR, DE,VERTIKAL
18
Route Spectrum
20-SEP-07 15:20:28
16
OVRALL= 22.12 V-DG
RMS = 20.32
14
LOAD = 100.0
RMS Velocity in mm/Sec
RPM = 1800.
12 RPS = 30.00
10
0
Freq: 30.00
0 40 80 120 160 200 Ordr: 1.000
Frequency in Hz Spec: 13.10
The outer steel ring of the coupling was turned 180 degrees vs. the
rubber elements - wich in this case was the rebalancing trick to reduce
the 1.st order vibration levels from 18 to 4 mm/s
Before vs. after dynamic balancing – reduced 1.st order
035 - GENERATOR 2
Gen 2 -P05 GENERATOR, DE,VERTIKAL
18
Route Spectrum
20-SEP-07 15:20:28
16
OVRALL= 22.12 V-DG
RMS = 20.32
14
LOAD = 100.0
10
0
Freq: 30.00
0 40 80 120 160 200 Ordr: 1.000
Frequency in Hz Spec: 13.10
035 - GENERATOR 2
Gen 2 -P05 GENERATOR, DE,VERTIKAL
10
Route Spectrum
28-SEP-07 10:54:16
RPM = 1801.
RPS = 30.01
0
Freq: 30.00
0 40 80 120 160 200 Ordr: 1.000
Frequency in Hz Spec: 4.018