Professional Documents
Culture Documents
lufthansagroup.com
Agenda
Permission to use Airport Infrastructure in Time for departure taking into account arrival,
specific Time Window for Arrival or Departure Definition departure and enroute situation, affected by
for a single date or series. weather, capacity and traffic conditions
Allocation up to 5 month in advance for approx. Allocated on day of ops for a single date and
200 congested airports worldwide Allocation updated instantly
Advance Planning Tool Tactical Tool on Day of Operation
No direct link between Airport and ATC Slot Relationship ATC Slots overrule Airport Slots
Examples KSF (Kassel), HHN (Hahn), BOS CGN, LUX, BUD, DRS, LEJ, ATH FRA, MUC, DUS, LHR, CDG, SIN
12
10 Airports are not participating in these
8 irregularity costs. Therefore an average
6 capacity utilization of 100% is easy for
4
them to demand!
2
0
-0,1 0,4 0,9 1,4
Demand/capacity ratio * Source: Airport Heathrow 2011
Airline Slot Management
17.12.2020, FRA GK/B
Seite 7
Overview of global Airport Capacity:
Congestion mainly a European problem due to limited Airport Expansion
= Level 1
Adequate airport infrastructure
= Level 2
Airports with potential for congestion
= Level 3
Airports where conditions make it
impossible to meet demand
Source: IATA WSG Annex 11.6
Airline Slot Management
17.12.2020, FRA GK/B
Seite 8
Agenda
Arrival Departure
Local Rules:
• airport and/or country specific;
• e.g. adhoc flights, night flights, procedures
!
Challenge: Differing interpretation of rules
• by Coordinators and/or Member States (and hence: different practices)
• e.g. historic precedence, slot swaps, ad-hocs
• In the EU, Member States appoint slot coordinators (natural or legal persons) for
their respective countries, who are responsible for:
• Neutral and transparent slot allocation according to prior defined priorities
• Procedure of slot monitoring (“use-it-or-lose-it” rule, slot performance, deadlines)
• In case of slot misuse imposition of sanctions like slot withdrawal, lower priority or
monetary penalties
• The same coordinator may be appointed for more than one airport
DEP 18:15
BKK
Exchanged between Airlines: Must be 1:1, often to solve each carrier‘s slot problem
LH 772 TG 2235
BKK
DEP 18:30
Share of Coordination Level of Airline Network Number of Airports per Coordination Level
percentage, based on frequencies/week absolute, based on frequencies/week
57,3 48,1
61,3 52,7
% %
% %
9,4 15,0
% % 11,7
%
-20
-80
-60
-40
20
40
60
80
0
30
100
130
200
230
300
330
400
430 I
500
530
600
630
II
700
730
800
830
900
930
1000
1030
III
1100
1130
1200
1230
1300
IV
1330
1400
1430
V
1500
1530
Connecting Bank Structure FRA Summer 2019
1600
1630
FRA S19 (VT1) - 60min ARR/DEP
1700
1730
1800
1830
VI
1900
1930
2000
2030
2100
2130
2200
2230
2300
2330
What the Competition is doing at their Hubs…
AF in CDG BA in LHR
CDG has seen constant capacity increases LHR is most congested airport, no capacity increases
Enabled Air France to built perfect bank system BA unable to built banc structure due to OAL Historics
Maximizes connecting opportunities for customers But LON huge catchment, no transfer pax needed!
• Some of todays top airlines were not in the list some ten years ago. Slots
are no obstacle to competition and market entry.
• Rising monopoly fees (airport, ATC and taxes), fuel cost and diminishing
yields lead to distressed airlines, market exits and consolidation.
• Growth and job creation elsewhere (BOGU carrier) due to lacking support
of airline industry in Europe.
lufthansagroup.com
Demand is dependent on airport, season, day of the week and time of day
1565
110
1515
1400
100
1465
1200
90
1415
1000
1365
800 80
1315
600 70
1265 400 60
200
50
1215
1165
0
Mo Di Mi Do Fr Sa So 40
1115
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 LT
95%
Avg
90%
80% 80%
Winter Season