Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Survey
Report
Bird monitoring Programme
2018 | 2019 | 2021
Introductory Training
Programme on Bird Monitoring
& Bird Ringing 2018
Photo Credits:
Padma Gyalpo, Member (WCBCL)
Smanla Tsering, Wildlife Guard, Dept. of Wildlife Protection, UT Ladakh
Anub Tsetan Paljor, Project Associate, SECURE Himalaya
Document Designer:
Kunga Thinley, Visual Designer | thinleykunga2019@gmail.com
The GoI-UNDP-GEF SECURE Himalaya led Annual Bird Monitoring Programmes have established the need to
monitor our birds on a regular basis, to gain better knowledge and information of the Birds of Ladakh. This will
help us plan and manage not only broad Conservation programmes, but also specific ones targeted at certain
species. These collaborative monitoring exercises between the Department and SECURE Himalaya have also
helped build capacities of our Wildlife Guards to better survey and monitor our birds.
I would like to thank the enthusiastic birders of Ladakh and Wildlife Conservation and Birds Club of Ladakh,
who have constantly enthused these monitoring events. I am of strong belief that citizen-led science is one of the
most robust ways to take bird monitoring forward in Ladakh.
In all three editions of this exercise, the Department has also ensured that young local
wildlife enthusiasts/volunteers especially those residing inside our Wildlife Sanctuaries and National Parks take
part in these exercises because being residents, they are the primary stakeholders and as such have a lot to offer
in making conservation programmes a success.
Based on the progress that we have seen under these exercises, the Department of Wildlife Protection is also
making these monitoring events as regular programme of theDepartment’s calendar.
Gallery
8
BNHS-India is a pan-India wildlife research organization that has been promoting the
cause of nature conservation for the past 133 years, since 1883. They are pioneers of
bird monitoring in India and have been crucial in taking the knowledge of bird watch-
ing monitoring to common citizens and getting them involved in bird monitoring
programmes. A team led by Dr Nita Shah, and consisting of Dr S. Balachandran, Dr P.
Sathiyaselvam, Dr Tuhina Katti, and three trapping experts namely, Mr Manoj Saini,
Mr V. Govindaraj, and Mr P. Murugesan, were invited to train personnel from the The
Wildlife Protection Department and other experienced students, experts, and citizens.
Day2 16th July 1. Mist Netting & Bird Ringing at Forest Bagh, Choglamsar
(Leh) 2. Bird Ringing Ethics and Protocols by Dr Tuhina Katti
3. Waterbird Capture & Handling by Dr P. Sathiyaselvam
Day7 21st July 1. Mist Netting and Ringing at Tree Plantation (morning and
(Hanle) afternoon)
2. Point Count Survey at Hanle
3. Data Summarization Session (onward) led by Dr Nita Shah
1. Introductory Session
The programme started with an introductory session led by SECURE Himalaya
Landscape Project Officer, Mr Narendra Patil who introduced the BNHS team to all
participants after which the Regional Wildlife Warden/SECURE Himalaya State Nodal
Officer Mr Sajid Sultan talked about the aims and objectives of the training and survey
programme. Soon after this, all the participants, bird trappers, and BNHS team intro-
duced themselves. Dr Nita Shah then spoke about the significance of Ladakh in bird
migration.
This session was centered on techniques used for counting waterbirds for the
purpose of conducting surveys and census. Dr Katti started the session by talking
about different kinds of wetlands and the importance of counting waterbirds. The pur-
pose of this session was to provide a theoretical understanding of various bird counting
The purpose of this session was to make clear to the participants that bird trap-
ping, handling, and ringing need to be approached with certain ethics and protocols.
This is to ensure that any bird ringing and monitoring activities carried out by the
trainees in the future are ethically sound and carried out under correct protocols. The
following checklist of ethics and protocols were covered in this session –
1. Requirement of Permissions
2. Formal Training and Certification
3. Banding Protocols: Ring – scheme, size, color, and ring detail
communication
4. Bird Trapping: Objectives, safety, baits, timing, seasons, netting frequency,
transportation, removal from trap, releasing, threats
5. Data Collection and Entry
6. Photographing birds in hand
the impact of avian influenza on human life since 2003-2006. Another important kind
of survey discussed was the Dead Bird Survey. Dr Sathiyaselvam displayed pictures of
dead birds at Chilika Lake and pointed out some prominent symptoms to look out for
while surveying dead birds. At the end Dr Sathiyaselvam concluded the session by giv-
ing some important recommendations to the participants for situations wherein they
encounter dead or ailing birds.
This early morning session was dedicated to getting a hands-on idea of how the
participants would go about conducting a line transect survey. Dr Nita Shah started the
session by introducing the concept of point counts, line transects, and block counts. It
was decided that the bird count would be carried out using the point count method. Dr
Nita Shah then explained the time and distance each team would cover for each point.
After this, the participants were divided into four teams of an average of 5 persons
each, and were assigned their starting points.
All four teams began their point count survey at approximately 0900hrs. All
teams covered 11 points over a distance of 2 kilometers. Each team covered 200me-
ters between two points while spending exactly 5 minutes at each point. The last team
returned to the camp site at 1130hrs.
All 7 teams came together to summarize and discuss the data that was collected
from the Point Count Survey carried out in the morning. The data was roughly being
collated and summarized by Dr Nita Shah. Dr Shah suggested that all teams realign
their data sheets and distribute their species count according to each point number.
Summarizing the raw data collected by all teams allowed all participants to get an over-
view of the species diversity that was recorded at the survey-wide level. Also, Dr Shah
correlated the habitat diversity covered with the species count collected by each team;
that is, more the number of habitats covered by a team, more the number of species
that they were able to record. After the data was summarized, Dr Shah and Regional
Wildlife Warden Mr Sajid Sultan asked all teams for feedback in terms of time spent,
distance covered, and team sizes. It emerged, through the feedback received from the
forest guards as well as other participants, that the team size could be optimally re-
duced to that of 3 persons per team. It was also noted that the time spent at each point
and distance covered were optimal for the purpose of the survey.
As per feedback received after the survey conducted at Tsokar, participants were
divided into seven teams of three members each. All teams were dispersed equally
around the Naga settlement of Hanle village. For this survey, the distance at which a
bird was spotted was added as an additional parameter. Additionally, all teams took
return point counts as well.
Dr Shah led the evening data summarization session wherein all teams gathered
to discuss the data collected by them. Dr Shah summarized the data collected by each
team under
- Species number
- Habitats covered
- minimum-maximum distance at which individuals were spotted - effort in
time
- minimum-maximum number of individuals of each species
Data from return point counts done at Hanle was collected and summarized at
this session. Dr Tuhina collated the data collected from both point count surveys and
generated graphical representations of the same. The survey data from Hanle was also
used to generate the habitat density of the area surveyed. The objective of this exercise
was to demonstrate to the participants that raw data from a simple point count survey
can be collated and processed to highlight crucial information on species richness,
species abundance, habitat density, overlap of species between different areas, efforts
required to conduct and repeat the same survey, as well as the effectiveness and validity
of the methodology used.
At the penultimate session, Regional Wildlife Warden Sajid Sultan concluded the
programme by talking about all that had been done and achieved over the past eight
days. Mr Sultan noted that a crucial outcome of this programme has been that at least
five wildlife guards came out as being proficient in mist netting, bird handling, bird
ringing, and data recording. Mr Sultan also appealed to the participants to hone the
knowledge they had gathered over the course of the training, and to spread it further
amongst friends and colleagues. All participants were then asked to speak about their
experience throughout the programme. After this, a brief discussion was held on how
this exercise could be improved the next time around it is conducted. Participants re-
marked that they had felt their knowledge on local birds had grown exponentially over
the past eight days and that they felt equipped with new skills in bird ringing and mon-
itoring. It was agreed upon by everyone, that such bird surveys need to be conducted
twice a year regularly to be able to collect extensive and meaningful data about the
health of the landscape ecosystem. It was also agreed that because of the uniqueness of
the landscape of Changthang, methodology with respect to bird trapping and data col-
lection has to be made adaptive to the characteristics of the landscape. Emphasis was
also laid on the importance of surveying waterbirds more intensively. The team from
BNHS also invited two- three of the wildlife guards to Point Calimere in Tamil Nadu,
during peak migratory season, to participate in bird trapping & ringing exercises, to
follow up on the training received during this programme. In conclusion, Mr Sultan
thanked the BNHS team for their invaluable contribution to making this programme
successful, and on a positive note, he hoped to have everyone’s participation in the next
bird survey, with the same fervor.
The BNHS team, led by Dr Nita Shah, handed certificated to all participants for
having successfully participated in the Introductory training programme on Bird Mon-
itoring & Bird Ringing.
Dr Nita Shah introduced all participants to various bird counting techniques with
which bird populations can be estimated. Participants were then given instructions re-
garding the Point Count Method. All teams were assigned a starting point from where
they would traverse a 2km trail at a 90o angle so that no two teams converge. Each
team had to cover 11 points with a distance of 200m between all points. Each team was
instructed to spend exactly 5 minutes at each point during which they would spot birds
with their naked eyes and use binoculars to identify them.
At Hanle, based on the feedback received by teams after their surveys, the size of each
team was reduced to 3 persons each. This was done to maximize the area that can be
covered under the survey and minimize the team size. Additionally, distance at which
the bird was spotted was added as a parameter to the survey. Participants were in-
structed to estimate, using ocular estimation, the distance between the point and the
bird in slabs of 5m. Another addition made to the survey conducted at Hanle was that
all teams collected data while returning on the same trail from their last point. This
data was collected continuously without stopping at any point.
The team from BNHS also trained the participants in various field survey protocols like
how to sight, count, and identify species. A short training and calibrating exercise was
also conducted on ocular distance estimation.
18
Guards being introduced to bird rings Wildlife guards being trained in diseased bird handling
Horned lark 4 82
Hill pigeon 3 16
Tibetan snow finch 1 5
Twite 1 1
Brand's mountain 1 6
finch Blandford's finch 1 2
Citrine wagtail 1 1
White rumped snow 1 6
finches Plain finch 1 7
Rose finch 1 2
Sand plover 1 1
Tibetan Sand Grouse 1 1
Horned Lark 7 83
Hume’s Short-toed 2 12
lark Hoopoe 1 3
Tibetan Snow Finch 1 4
Lesser Sand Plover 3 4
Red Billed Chough 1 70
Desert Wheatear Ti- 6 33
betan Lark 5 46
Citrine Wagtail 5 12
Upland Buzzard Com- 4 4
mon Raven 2 3
Black Winged Stilt 1 1
Ruddy Shell duck 4 14
Common Red Shank 1 1
Black billed magpie 1 1
House sparrow 3 5
Yellow Billed Chough 1 4
Robin Accenter 1 2
Brandt’s Mountain 1 20
finch Tibetan Sand 1 1
Grouse Black Necked 2 3
Crane Barn Swallow 1 20
2
Twite 1 3
Out of these, Scrub land was encountered the most number of times while Pasture was
encountered only once.
At Hanle, partipants encountered various types of habitats along their trails. The most
common type of habitat was Marshy while the least common types were Rocky and
Stream. The following are the types of habitats encountered under this survey -
• Marshy
• Barren
• Grassland
• Bog
• Meadow
• Barren-Rocky • Rocky
• Stream
It must be noted that the number of species observed through the point count survey
was higher that the number of species observed while walking the line transect. It was
thus concluded that the point count approach is a more effective method.
Bird Ringing
Birds were ringed on the 16th and 21st of July, 2018, at Choglamsar Forest Bagh, Leh,
and the Hanle Willow plantation, Changthang, respectively. The birds were ringed
as part of the training provided by BNHS. Participants were first briefed about bird
handling and ringing protocols during the classroom workshop sessions. After the
workshop session, the participants were taken to the local Forest Bagh at Choglamsar
for demonstration of bird ringing. The mist netting technique, which was also taught
and demonstrated to the participants, was used to trap birds at both Forest Bagh and
Hanle. A total of 26 birds were ringed over the course of the programme.
2. The survey did not give us a baseline estimation of the abundance of birds in
the identified study area due to the weather. We observed overcast skies and precip-
itation on all six days of our field visits which became an impediment to our survey.
As our primary objective was to train the department personnel in the methodology
of counting birds, we were unable to collect accurate data. For instance, the trainees
require ample practice in recording distance through ocular estimation, therefore, the
distances that they recorded may not be fully accurate.
Therefore, the data that has been collected during the training workshop can not be
considered as a baseline estimate for future surveys.
Feedback
The first training programme on bird monitoring and bird ringing brought forth a
number of lessons to be learnt for the future. It was mutually understood by all par-
ticipants and experts that this introductory programme was not an end in itself but
only the first step towards developing a pool of well trained field observers, who would
carry out more systematic and strategized bird surveys in the future. Through this
programme, we were able to assess our needs in terms of manpower, logistics, method-
ology, equipment, and study design. It was agreed that,
1. There must be a follow up with the trainees to ensure their continuous
participation in upcoming bird surveys.
2. Substantial efforts are required to train field observers. Therefore, in the
future, a two-day field training session should be conducted before the
actual survey is taken up.
3. A dedicated team must be engaged to decide on the number of surveys,
their design, and methodology.
4. The surveys should be standardised, keeping in mind the most suitable
season to observe, trap, and ring birds.
5. Sites for undertaking the surveys should also be identified and standardised
into the larger survey design.
The trans-Himalayan landscape in Ladakh also serves as a breeding site for many water
birds species including the globally threatened Black-necked Crane (Grus nigricollis).
Yet, only sporadic information is available on the status and diversity of waterbirds
here.
Rationale
Study Area
The Tso Kar Basin is one of the most important breeding areas of the Black-necked
Crane Grus nigricollis in India (Pfister 1998). This IBA is also the major breeding
area for Crested Grebe Podiceps cristatus, Bar-headed Geese Anser indicus, Ruddy
Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea, Brown-headed Gull Larus brunnicephalus and Com-
mon Tern Sterna hirundo. During autumn migration, the Tso Kar Basin becomes an
assembling place for local breeding birds as well as a major staging spot for migrants,
and congregations of thousands of birds can be observed.
Apart from globally important avifauna the Tso Kar basin houses other key Fauna such
as the Tibetan Wild Ass Equus kiang and Tibetan Argali Ovis ammon hodgsoni forage
on the slopes and meadows, while Tibetan Wolf Canis lupus and Red Fox Vulpes
vulpes occur in the surrounding plains. In addition, evidence of the endangered Snow
Leopard Uncia uncia has been recorded.
B. HanleMarshes
These marshes are located west and north of Hanle village in Ladakh, near the
border with China. They are partly state owned and partly under the Hanle Buddhist
monastery. The habitat is a complex of fast flowing streams, stagnant pools, saline
marshes, seasonally flooded marshes, and bogs along the Hanle river, 45 km south of
its confluence with the Indus river. The wetlands are frozen from November to April
and are fed by snowmelt in summer. The freshwater pools shelter species such as Hy-
drilla, Myriophyllum, Potamogeton, and an edible aquatic lichen. 28
The area is an important breeding ground for various waterfowl including the Black-
necked crane Grus nigricollis. There is a recent report of three breeding pairs of Black-
necked crane in the Hanle marshes and one in Lal Pahri (Rauf Zargar pers. comm.
2003). This site is also an important breeding area for the Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna fer-
ruginea and the Lesser Sand Plover Charadrius mongolus. During autumn migration
many birds pass through this site, including the globally threatened Greater Spotted
Eagle Aquila clanga. It uses the plain as the last staging site before crossing the Hima-
layan range (Pfister 2001).
Programme Schedule
SESSION ACTIVITIES
30
Session 2 – Aims and Objectives of the Bird Survey/ Monitoring Programme – by Mr.
Md Sajid Sultan IFS, CWLW Ladakh.
The Chief Wildlife Warden Ladakh warmly welcomed all the participants to the
programme and explained in detail the importance of the biodiversity of Ladakh.
Further he explained why the wetlands of Changthang hotspots of biodiversity in
an otherwise seemingly barren landscape. He further emphasises that timely
monitoring of avifauna and other species gives us much needed insight on the status
of our natural heritage and what interventions are required to conserve them.
All the participants greatly appreciated the inspiring overview provided by Mr. Takpa and
pledged to conserve this natural heritage collectively.
32
The Wildlife Warden Leh, gave a detailed presentation on the basics of surveying avifauna,
methods, data collection, analysis and the overall need for timely monitoring of species and
habitats. Some highlights of the said session were as follows: -
1. Why count birds, Where to Count & When to count.
2. Planning a survey
3. Sampling Strategies
4. Point Counts and Line Transects.
5. Data Collection & Analysis
6. Basic Field Gear requirements.
Session 6 – Using the E-bird application to record data - by Mr. Pankaj Raina, Wildlife
Warden (WLW) Leh.
This session by WLW Leh succinctly captured the utility of the globally used E-bird
application, and its immense applicability as a citizen science tool. The session consisted of a
demonstration of how to create/submit an offline checklist on the E-bird application both on
Android and IOS platforms. After the live demonstration each participant was encouraged to
submit a mock checklist to ensure that they have gained full understanding of the same. Post
this WLW Leh instructed each participant to prepare and submit a checklist on the E-bird App
once they go back their places of residence that evening.
For the survey the area was divided into broad zones, to cover all the micro-hab-
itat characteristics at each site. Further the core method used to conduct the survey
was that of the Point Count Method. For this purpose, each team, covered 11 points
on a transect over 2 kilometres and each point was spaced 200 meters apart from the
previous one. The respective teams spent 5 minutes at each point count, surveying for
avifauna.
Each team comprised of two spotters and one data recorder. Furthermore, each team
was equipped with one pair of Binoculars, one camera and a smartphone.
A new initiative in the Annual Bird Survey Programme 2019 was that all the data were
uploaded, and checklists created on the “E-bird platform” using the “Ebird offline app.”
Post the survey data from all the e-bird checklists was collated and results analysed.
The said use of technology was intended to promote the citizen science initiative
wherein all the participants were trained and encouraged to use the E-bird application
during the survey and in future endeavours as well. This initiative was highly appreci-
ated by all the participants.
Data was recorded on the species sighted, number of individuals and micro-habitat
type. Even ‘Flyby’ avifauna were recorded. At each site, surveys were conducted at two
times, i.e. at early morning hours and before sunset to capture the diversity at the time
of maximum avi-faunal activity.
34
Bar-headed Goose LC 76
Ruddy Shelduck LC 100
Garganey LC 50
Gadwall LC 56
Northern Pintail LC 10
Common Merganser LC 07
Mallard LC 03
Little Grebe LC 20
Great Crested Grebe LC 40
Eurasian Coot LC 29
Black-winged Stilt LC 1
Lesser Sand-Plover LC 4
Little Ringed Plover LC 8
Little Stint LC 3
Temminck’s Stint LC 2
Common Sandpiper LC 30
Common Greenshank LC 2
Common Redshank LC 16
Brown-headed Gull LC 50
Pallas's Gull LC 4
Grey Heron LC 5
Black-necked Crane VU 3
Citrine Wagtail LC 2
White Wagtail LC 2
Grey Wagtail LC 1
Bluethroat LC 2
Ruff LC 42
Tibetan Sandgrouse LC 75
Great Rosefinch LC 3
Brandt’s Mountain Finch LC 200
Twite LC 70
Plain Mountain Finch LC 5
Blanford’s Snowfinch LC 100
Hanle Marshes
SPECIES CONSERVATION STATUS NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS
Black-necked Crane VU 4
Grey Heron LC 2
Ruddy Shelduck LC 60
Northern Pintail LC 43
Gadwall LC 50
Bar-headed Goose LC 36
Common Kingfisher LC 1
White wagtail LC 10
Citrine Wagtail LC 1
Grey Wagtail LC 1
36
Common Redshank LC 1
Brown-headed Gull LC 7
Black-winged stilt LC 2
Ruff LC 1
Green Sandpiper LC 2
Bluethroat LC 2
Upland Buzzard LC 2
Eurasian Kestrel LC 5
Eurasian Hobby LC 1
Robin Accentor LC 4
House Sparrow LC 20
Common Tern 1
Eurasian Kestrel 1
Lammergeir/Bearded Vulture 1
Saker Falcon 1
Upland Buzzard 1
Horned Lark 50
Little Owl 1
Black Redstart 1
Ground Tit 8
Common Raven 8
Hill Pigeon 35
Black-winged Snowfinch 30
Blanford’s Snowfinch 100
Plain Mountain Finch 5
Twite 70
Brandt’s Mountain Finch 200
Great Rosefinch 3
Tibetan Sandgrouse 75
Ruff 42
Bluethroat 2
Grey Wagtail 1
White Wagtail 2
Citrine Wagtail 2
Black-necked Crane 3
Grey Heron 5
Pallas's Gull 4
Brown-headed Gull 15
Common Redshank 60
Common Greenshank 2
Common Sandpiper 30
Temminck’s Stint 2
Little Stint 3
Little Ringed Plover 8
Lesser Sand-Plover 4 38
Black-winged Stilt 1
Eurasian Coot 29
Great Crested Grebe 40
Little Grebe 20
Mallard 3
Common Merganser 7
Northern Pintail 10
Gadwall 56
Garganey 50
Ruddy Shelduck 100
Bar-headed Goose 76
Bird monitoring programs or surveys help generate data; data gathered over periods
of time generate information, relevant information becomes key knowledge and good
knowledge can be translated into effective policies. Surveys help generate data on
population status, trends, changes in distribution of birds etc. and can also serve as a
form of early warning system by highlighting potential environmental problems. Such
knowledge can then guide policies, refine research priorities as well as track ongoing
management activities, their accomplishments, flaws etc. (Bibby et al. 1998)
There are still substantial gaps in our knowledge of the distributions, abundances, and
densities of species of birds spread across Ladakh. Owing to this, our policies towards
conservation of birds and animals of Ladakh as well as high conservation value areas
(HCVAs) such as wetlands, marshes etc. are not as effective as they should be. Birds
have been demonstrated to serve as good indicators of biodiversity and environmental
change and as such can be used to make strategic conservation planning decisions for
the wider environment as well. Therefore, having a clear ‘purpose’ or ‘targets’ laid out
for a survey is very important. Often, this purpose revolves around three key elements
– Species, Sites or (Important Bird Areas) and Habitats.
The 3rd Edition of the Bird Monitoring/Survey Programme under the SECURE
Himalaya Project, supported by the Department of Wildlife Protection, UT Ladakh
was held successfully from the 20th to 28th of September, 2021. Bombay Natural
History Society (BNHS) provided technical support with their expertise in finalising
survey methodology while other relevant local organisations sent their members to
participate in the survey. A total of 38 participants including Wildlife Guards, local
experts from Wildlife Conservation and Birds Club of Ladakh (WCBCL), students
from SAVE Changthang, SECMOL, and other volunteers from Snow Leopard
Conservancy India Trust (SLC-IT), Nature Guide Trainees (NGT) etc conducted the
survey in field from 21st-27th September.
11:15 - 11:30am Address by Sh. Sajjad Hussain Mufti (IFS) Regional Wildlife Warden,
UT Ladakh
11:30 - 11:45am Experiences from the last two Nansel Stobdan, Project Associate, SECURE
surveys
11:45 - 12:15pm Tea Break
42
12:15 - 01:00pm Introduction to the Birds of Ladakh Mr. Lobzang Visuddha, Founder, Birds Club of Ladakh
03:30 - 04:30pm Introduction to eBird and Merlin Mr. Omkar Joshi, Junior Research Fellow, BNHS
Application
04:30 - 05:00pm Division of Teams and Field Plan Anub Paljor, Project Associate, SECURE
05:00 - 06:00pm Hands on with eBird around the BNHS + SECURE
venue
The event started of on the 20th September with an Orientation Day programme at
Indus Valley Hotel Conference Hall. The Chief Wildlife Warden, UT Ladakh, Sh. Sajjad
Hussain Mufti (IFS) welcomed all participants and reminded everyone of the task at
hand. He also appreciated the overwhelming female participation from various villages
of Changthang.
Mr. Lobzang
Visuddha
gave a
presentation
on the Birds
of Ladakh
to verse the
participants
with what to
expect in the
coming week
in field and
the different
challenges
that they
might face.
Mr.Visuddha, Founder, Birds Club of Ladakh, giving an introductory presentation on the 'Birds of Ladakh'
The second half of the day was led by a team of three ornithologists from BNHS;
Dr.Himadri Mondal, Ms. Tuhina Katti and Mr.Omkar Joshi gave presentations on
ethics of birding, methodology, applications to be used, etc. while engaging with
the participants. Dr. Himadri spoke on the importance of Ethics during birding and
reminded the participants to minimize disturbance to the birds and ways to do so. Ms.
Tuhina and Mr. Omkar then spoke on the methodologies to be used, applications to be
used etc.
44
The daily schedule for the survey was planned as shown on the next page and shared
with the participants:
Day 1 Monday (20th Sept. 2021) Orientation Workshop The Indus Valley, Upper Chulung, Leh
Day 2 Tuesday (21st Sept. 2021) Birding Travel to Changthang in two teams
Day 9 Tuesday (28th Sept. 2021) Concluding session The Indus Valley, Upper Chulung, Leh
and valedictory
METHODOLOGY
Waterbird monitoring is an essential tool to get the status of the species population.
It also helps to understand the quality of the habitat. Long term monitoring data can
give the trends of the particular species. It helps to identify the important wetland
sites for the waterbirds in their different life stages. The analysis of that data is crucial
to decide the conservation strategies for the species that are at risk. Waterbird count
data is essential while for the wetland management, policies, agreements, and other
conservation tools.
At the end of the orientation day, all participants had downloaded the Cornell eBird
and Merlin Phone Applications. They were also given the field guide - ‘Birds and
Mammals of Ladakh’ by Otto Phister to aid during the survey as well as for later use.
The waterbird population was counted by direct counts (Spindler et al. 1981). To do
so, the bird congregations were approached as close as possible without disturbing.
Conspicuous species present in relatively small numbers or dispersed widely were
counted singly, whereas birds in large flocks were generally estimated by mentally
dividing the congregation into small groups of 10 to 100 depending on the size of the
flock, and by counting the number of groups.
All participants were divided into Two Teams of around 20 individuals each. One
team travelled to Tsokar and Tsomoriri Wetland Complex, both RAMSAR sites, and
the other team travelled to Hanle and Chushul Marshes. Ms. Tuhina and Mr. Omkar
accompanied Team 1 to Tsokar and Tsomoriri while Dr. Himadri went with Team 2
to Hanle and Chushul Marshes. The teams were also accompanied by two different
kitchen teams and staff along with representatives from SECURE Himalaya.
46
Google Satellite Images. Clockwise From Top Left – Tsokar and Starstapuk Tso, Tsomoriri, Hanle and Chushul Marshes
TIMINGS ACTIVITIES
09:30 am Breakfast
10:30 – 11:30 am Interactive session and Reconfirming Bird Sightings (Group Activity)
05:30 – 06:30 pm Interactive session and Reconfirming Bird Sightings (Group Activity) + Evening Tea
8:30 pm Dinner
FINDINGS:
A combined total of almost 100 different species was monitored by both teams, with
2-3 species of Birds being extremely rare such as the Common Quail and Indian
Paradise Fly Catcher (Common Quail being photographed for the first time in
Ladakh).
SMANLA TSERING
WILDLIFE GUARD, DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE PROTECTION, UT LADAKH.
3. Each year, our count of bird species as well as individuals is going up, which
reassures me that our knowledge, skill, and capacity is increasing with such
programs. This year, the other team that went to Hanle and Chushul Marshes were
lucky to see some rare species.
PADMA GYALPO
MEMBER, WILDLIFE CONSERVATION AND BIRDS CLUB OF LADAKH
This bird has been previously observed only in Suru Valley in Kargil on 12 July,1928
by BB Osmaston, in 1940 by W.Koelz and 1986 by P.R. Holmes - all only via its call
record. The bird makes a loud and clear trisyllabic whistle- “pit pit-it” similar to ‘wet
my lips’ when heard clearly. The Common Quail has never been photographed in
Ladakh before and hence this was the first instance where anyone was able to take a
photograph of this very elusive bird.
54
@Padma Gyalpo
After the success of the SECURE Himalaya led Bird Surveys since 2018, the
Department of Wildlife Protection, UT Ladakh, under the leadership of Sh. Preet Pal
Singh (IFS) Chief Wildlife Warden, UT Ladakh, has identified such surveys to be held
as annual activities under the department. This was resonated in the speech given by
Sh. Preet Pal Singh during the opening ceremony of the First Ladakh Bird Festival,
where he reinforced that such monitoring programs need to be carried out in every
region of Ladakh on a more regular basis to gather better knowledge and information
on the Birds of Ladakh. The Department of Wildlife Protection is also planning
on making the ‘Ladakh Bird Festival’ an annual event where similar surveys and
monitoring programs will be held along with other activities with the aim of making
Ladakh Bird Festival one of the best bird festivals in India in the coming years. A
comprehensive action plan to monitor birds in Ladakh will be developed subsequently
in consultation with Bombay Natural History Society.
Sh. Preet Pal Singh (IFS) Chief Wildlife Warden, Sh. Sajjad Hussain Mufti (IFS) Regional Wildlife Warden with Padma Shri Morup Namgail, Mr
Tsetan Angchuk and the crew of the Musical Play.
56
@Smanla Tsering Upland Buzzard @Smanla Tsering White Wagtail
@Smanla
BirdTsering
Survey Report 2018 Horned
56 Lark
@Smanla Tsering Plain Mountain Finch
58
@Padma Gyalpo