®FSPPP/2020/2021

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

FACULTY OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE AND POLICY STUDIES
Bachelor of Corporate Administration (Hons)
Bachelor of Administrative Science (Hons)

Course: Southeast Asian Affairs Code: ADS560

Lectures: Dr. Ahmad Shah Pakeer Mohamed (ahmad7243@uitm.edu.my)
Tutorials:

Course Outcome:
Upon completion of the course, students should be able to:

TEACHING & LEARNING

No COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES (CLO) PLO MOHE MQF 2.0 TAXONOMY DOMAIN
ACTIVITY
Analyse how ASEAN deals with various issues using its own C4
1 2 3 2 Final Test, Asignment
mechanism in Southeast Asia regions.
Demonstrate effective leadership skills in discussion of issues in
2 Southeast Asia countries during the Cold War and Post-Cold War 8 9 8 A3 Presentation
period;
Demonstrate managerial skills in explaining the role of ASEAN on A3
3 9 8 9 Group Project
dealing issues at various levels of interactions.
List of PLO/MQF:

PLO MQF

PLO1: Apply knowledge of management, administration, accounting, law, and business in carrying out administrative MQF1: Knowledge
responsibilities.
PLO2: Demonstrate skills in management, administration, accounting, law, and business in providing quality services at MQF2: Practical Skills
various levels of corporate sectors.
PLO3: Demonstrate social networking with the stakeholders and community responsibly. MQF3: Social Skills and Responsibility
PLO4: Demonstrate values, attitudes and professional ethics. MQF4: Values, Attitudes, & Professionalism
PLO5: Lead and communicate with team members and stakeholders. MQF5: Communication, Leadership and Teamwork Skills
PLO6: Employ scientific techniques in solving governance and administrative issues. MQF6: Problem Solving and Scientific Skills
PLO7: Manage information in seeking new knowledge and skills. MQF7: Information Management and Lifelong Learning Skills
PLO8: Manage and demonstrate innovative approaches in addressing local and global challenges. MQF8: Managerial and Entrepreneurial Skills
Student Learning Time (SLT)

1
 ®FSPPP/2020/2021

This course requires about 120 hrs of student’s learning time over the course of the semester. The 120 hours include the 46 hrs of meeting or in class/iLearn interaction. You must allocate and
manage the balance of the hours in searching and reading the literature in the process of answering the test question/s, preparing and presenting the assignment. Your personal SLT may be
higher or lower than one stated here. Understand your own capacity and organize accordingly.

SCHEME OF WORK
SEMESTER MARCH – JULY 2020

Week Week Lecture topic Learning Outcomes Reading Lists Hours Tutorial
No. Beg. (At the end of the session, Supplementary problem / Discussion Assignments
students should be able to: )

1 WEEK Southeast  To be able to know 11 Steven A. Leibo (2015). East & 3 1. Introduction to the course Tutorial Discussion
1 Asia : An countries in Southeast Southeast Asia. The World 2. Introduction of 11 countries in SEA
Overview Asia Today Series 2015-2016, 3. SEA in Cold War & Post-Cold War
 To explain the basic of Lanham, MD, Stryker-Post
regionalism Publications. 47th Editions.
 To discuss introduction of
Southeast Asia Supplementary Readings

2 WEEK Southeast  To be able to know 11 Steven A. Leibo (2015). East & 3 1. Introduction to the course Tutorial Discussion
2 Asia : An countries in Southeast Southeast Asia. The World 2. Introduction of 11 countries in SEA
Overview Asia Today Series 2015-2016, 3. SEA in Cold War & Post-Cold War
(Cont)  To explain the basic of Lanham, MD, Stryker-Post
regionalism Publications. 47th Editions.
 To discuss introduction of
Southeast Asia Supplementary Readings

2
 ®FSPPP/2020/2021

WEE
3 K3 Southeast  To understand the Steven A. Leibo (2015). East & 3 1. Discuss the various ways on overview Political Structure in Tutorial Discussion
Asia : Political political structure in Southeast Asia. The World Southeast Asia
Structure Southeast Asia Today Series 2015-2016, 2. Discuss about Democracy, Monarchy, Communism
Lanham, MD, Stryker-Post system in Southeast Asia
 To explain the Publications. 47th Editions. 3. For example some Case Studies
differentiate political
system in Southeast Supplementary Readings
Asia

 To be able to learn
political structure each
country in Southeast
Asia

Steven A. Leibo (2015). East &

4 WEEK Southeast  To be able to explain Southeast Asia. The World 3 1. Define Traditional Security issues in Southeast Asia Blended Learning/
4 Asia: Political the security dilemma in Today Series 2015-2016, 2. Define Non-traditional security issues in Southeast Asia Flexible Delivery
Security Southeast Asia Lanham, MD, Stryker-Post
issues Publications. 47th Editions. Tutorial Discussion
Upheaval  To explain the Non- Group Leflection:
Traditional treats in Supplementary Readings Please respond
Southeast Asia through iLearn.
Southeast Asian Affairs 2017.
 To discuss the action (2017). (ed.) Dilgit Singh and
and mechanism in Melcolm Cook. Singapore:
dealing with security ISEAS Publications
and threats Southeast Asian Affairs 2018.
(2018). (ed.) Dilgit Singh and
Melcolm Cook. Singapore:
ISEAS Publications

5 WEEK Southeast  To be able to explain Steven A. Leibo (2015). East & 3 1. Define Traditional Security issues in Southeast Asia Flexible Delivery
5 Asia: Political the security dilemma in Southeast Asia. The World
2. Define Non-traditional security issues in Southeast Asia
Security Southeast Asia Today Series 2015-2016, Please refer to the
issues Lanham, MD, Stryker-Post previous planned

3

Upheaval  To explain the Non-
Traditional treats in
Southeast Asia
 To discuss the action
and mechanism in
dealing with security
and threats
6 WEEK Southeast  Able to explain the
6 Asia: ASEAN formation of ASEAN
Organization organization
 To explain the
structure of ASEAN
 To discuss policy
and relations in ASEAN
7 WEEK Southeast  Able to explain the
7 Asia: ASEAN formation of ASEAN
Organization organization
 To explain the
Publications. 47th Editions.
Supplementary Readings
Southeast Asian Affairs 2017.
(2017). (ed.) Dilgit Singh and
Melcolm Cook. Singapore:
ISEAS Publications
Southeast Asian Affairs 2018.
(2018). (ed.) Dilgit Singh and
Melcolm Cook. Singapore:
ISEAS Publications
Supplementary Readings
Surin Pitsuwan, Hidetoshi
Nishimura, Ponciano Intal, Jr.,
Kavi Chongki􀆩 avorn, and Larry
Maramis (2017) The ASEAN
Journey: Refl ections of ASEAN
Leaders and Offcials.
Publication Economic Research
Institute for ASEAN and East
Asia (ERIA).
Andrew McGregor,
Lisa Law and Fiona Miller (2018)
Routledge Handbook Of
Southeast Asian Development
published 2018 by Routledge.
New York. NY
Supplementary Readings
Surin Pitsuwan, Hidetoshi
Nishimura, Ponciano Intal, Jr.,
Kavi Chongki􀆩 avorn, and Larry
®FSPPP/2020/2021
Presentation (20%), (Group) activity and upload
beginning from Week 5 until week 8 video presentation
in iLearn.
Students need to prepare presentation slides and submit video
presentation via i-learn Refer to Appendix
I : Rubric for
presentation
3 Flexible Delivery
1. Introduction to ASEAN
2. Non-interference Policy Please refer to the
previous planned
3. Bilateral Relations
activity and upload
video presentation
in iLearn.
Presentation (20%), (Group)
beginning from Week 5 until week 8
Refer to Appendix
I : Rubric for
Students need to prepare presentation slides and submit video presentation
presentation via i-learn
3 Flexible Delivery
1 ASEAN in the Global Arena
2 ASEAN: Multilateral Institutions Please refer to the
previous planned
activity and upload
4
 ®FSPPP/2020/2021

structure of ASEAN Maramis (2017) The ASEAN Presentation (20%), (Group) video presentation
Journey: Refl ections of ASEAN beginning from Week 5 until week 8 in iLearn.
 To discuss policy Leaders and Offcials.
and relations in ASEAN Publication Economic Research Students need to prepare presentation slides and submit video Refer to Appendix
Institute for ASEAN and East presentation via i-learn I : Rubric for
Asia (ERIA). presentation

Andrew McGregor,
Lisa Law and Fiona Miller (2018)
Routledge Handbook Of
Southeast Asian Development
published 2018 by Routledge.
New York. NY

SEMESTER BREAK

8 WEEK Southeast  Able to explain ASEAN
8 Asia: ASEAN engagement in
and Regional multilateral Institutions
Cooperation
 To explain ASEAN
Regional Cooperation
 To discuss bilateral and
multilateral policy and
relations in ASEAN
Supplementary Readings
Surin Pitsuwan, Hidetoshi
Nishimura, Ponciano Intal, Jr.,
Kavi Chongki􀆩 avorn, and Larry
Maramis (2017) The ASEAN
Journey: Refl ections of ASEAN
Leaders and Offcials.
Publication Economic Research
Institute for ASEAN and East
Asia (ERIA).
3 1. ASEAN in the Global Arena Flexible Delivery
2. ASEAN: Multilateral Institutions
Please refer to the
Presentation (20%), (Group) previous planned
beginning from Week 5 until week 8 activity and upload
video presentation
Students need to prepare presentation slides and submit video in iLearn.
presentation via i-learn
Refer to Appendix
I : Rubric for
presentation

Andrew McGregor,
Lisa Law and Fiona Miller (2018)
Routledge Handbook Of
Southeast Asian Development
published 2018 by Routledge.
New York. NY

5

9 WEEK
9 Southeast  Able to explain ASEAN
Asia: ASEAN engagement in
and Regional multilateral Institutions
Cooperation
 To explain ASEAN
Regional Cooperation
 To discuss bilateral and
multilateral policy and
relations in ASEAN
10 WEEK Southeast  To understand the
10 Asia: Way concept of ASEAN
Forward Community 2015
 To be able to explain on
the objectives of
ASEAN Community
2015
 To explain the
challenges of ASEAN
ahead
 To analyse the Future of
ASEAN
®FSPPP/2020/2021
Supplementary Readings 3 1. ASEAN in the Global Arena Flexible Delivery
2. ASEAN: Multilateral Institutions
Surin Pitsuwan, Hidetoshi Please refer to the
Nishimura, Ponciano Intal, Jr., Group roject (30%), (Group) previous planned
Kavi Chongki􀆩 avorn, and Larry beginning from Week 9 until week 11 activity and upload
Maramis (2017) The ASEAN the Project in
Journey: Refl ections of ASEAN Students need to prepare analysis Video Project or analysis iLearn @ Turnitin
Leaders and Offcials. case studies dan submit the project via i-learn @ Turnitin
Publication Economic Research
Institute for ASEAN and East
Asia (ERIA). Refer to Appendix
III: Rubric for
Andrew McGregor, Group Project
Lisa Law and Fiona Miller (2018)
Routledge Handbook Of
Southeast Asian Development
published 2018 by Routledge.
New York. NY
Supplementary Readings
3 1. ASEAN’s Challenges Ahead Flexible Delivery
Surin Pitsuwan, Hidetoshi 2. ASEAN Community 2015
Nishimura, Ponciano Intal, Jr., Please refer to the
Kavi Chongki􀆩 avorn, and Larry previous planned
Maramis (2017) The ASEAN Group roject (30%), (Group) activity and upload
Journey: Refl ections of ASEAN beginning from Week 9 until week 11 the Project in
Leaders and Offcials. iLearn @ Turnitin
Publication Economic Research Students need to prepare analysis Video Project or analysis
Institute for ASEAN and East case studies dan submit the project via i-learn @ Turnitin
Asia (ERIA).
Refer to Appendix
Andrew McGregor, III: Rubric for
Lisa Law and Fiona Miller (2018) Group Project
Routledge Handbook Of
Southeast Asian Development
published 2018 by Routledge.
New York. NY
CUTI PERAYAAN
6
 ®FSPPP/2020/2021

25 Dis 2021 – 02 Jan 2022

11 WEEK Supplementary Readings
11 Southeast  To understand the 3 3. ASEAN’s Challenges Ahead Flexible Delivery
Asia: Way concept of ASEAN Surin Pitsuwan, Hidetoshi 4. ASEAN Community 2015
Forward Community 2015 Nishimura, Ponciano Intal, Jr., Please refer to the
Kavi Chongki􀆩 avorn, and Larry previous planned
 To be able to explain on Maramis (2017) The ASEAN Group roject (30%), (Group) activity and upload
the objectives of Journey: Refl ections of ASEAN beginning from Week 9 until week 11 the Project in
ASEAN Community Leaders and Offcials. iLearn @ Turnitin
2015 Publication Economic Research Students need to prepare analysis Video Project or analysis
Institute for ASEAN and East case studies dan submit the project via i-learn @ Turnitin Refer to Appendix
 To explain the Asia (ERIA). III: Rubric for
challenges of ASEAN Group Project
ahead Andrew McGregor,
Lisa Law and Fiona Miller (2018)
 To analyse the Future of Routledge Handbook Of
ASEAN Southeast Asian Development
published 2018 by Routledge.
New York. NY

12 WEEK
12 Southeast  To understand the Supplementary Readings 3 Flexible Delivery
Asia: Way concept of ASEAN Discussion and revision Past year question
Forward Community 2015 Surin Pitsuwan, Hidetoshi Students are
Nishimura, Ponciano Intal, Jr., required to actively
 To be able to explain on Kavi Chongki􀆩 avorn, and Larry STUDENTS NEED TO SUBMIT (GROUP ASSIGNMENT) VIA involved in i-Learn.
the objectives of Maramis (2017) The ASEAN I-LEARN @ TURNIT-IN
ASEAN Community Journey: Refl ections of ASEAN Refer to Appendix
2015 Leaders and Offcials. II: Rubric for
Publication Economic Research Group Assignment
 To explain the Institute for ASEAN and East
challenges of ASEAN Asia (ERIA).
ahead
Andrew McGregor,
 To analyse the Future of Lisa Law and Fiona Miller (2018)
ASEAN Routledge Handbook Of
Southeast Asian Development
published 2018 by Routledge.

7
 ®FSPPP/2020/2021

New York. NY

13 WEEK
13 Southeast  To understand the Supplementary Readings 3 Discussion and revision Past year question Flexible Delivery
Asia: Way concept of ASEAN
Forward Community 2015 Surin Pitsuwan, Hidetoshi Students are
Nishimura, Ponciano Intal, Jr., required to actively
 To be able to explain on Kavi Chongki􀆩 avorn, and Larry involved in i-Learn.
the objectives of Maramis (2017) The ASEAN
ASEAN Community Journey: Refl ections of ASEAN
2015 Leaders and Offcials.
Publication Economic Research
 To explain the Institute for ASEAN and East
challenges of ASEAN Asia (ERIA).
ahead
Andrew McGregor,
 To analyse the Future of Lisa Law and Fiona Miller (2018)
ASEAN Routledge Handbook Of
Southeast Asian Development
published 2018 by Routledge.
New York. NY

14 WEEK Discussion, 3 Flexible Delivery

14 Revision and Discussion and revision Past year question
Conclusion Students are
required to actively
involved in i-Learn.

REVISION WEEK
31st Jan – 02nd Feb 2022

FINAL TEST
03rd Feb – 23rd Feb 2022

8
 ®FSPPP/2020/2021

REFERENCES

RECOMMENDED TEXT

Steven A. Leibo (2015). East & Southeast Asia. The World Today Series 2015-2016, Lanham, MD, Stryker-Post
Publications. 47th Editions.

Surin Pitsuwan, Hidetoshi Nishimura, Ponciano Intal, Jr., Kavi Chongkiavorn, and Larry Maramis (2017) The
ASEAN Journey: Refl ections of ASEAN Leaders and Offcials. Publication Economic Research Institute for
ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).

Southeast Asian Affairs 2017. (2017). (ed.) Dilgit Singh and Melcolm Cook. Singapore: ISEAS Publications

Southeast Asian Affairs 2018. (2018). (ed.) Dilgit Singh and Melcolm Cook. Singapore: ISEAS Publications

RECOMMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTARY READINGS

Acharya, A. (2013). The Making of Southeast Asia: International Relations of a Region, Cornell University Press,
Institute Of Southeast Asian Studies Singapore: ISEAS, First Edition.

Arndt, H.W. & Hill, Hal (ed.) (1999). Southeast Asia’s economic crisis: Origins, lessons and the way forward,
Singapore: ISEAS Publications.

Beeson, M. (2003). ASEAN Plus Three and the rise of reactionary regionalism, Contemporary Southeast Asia;
August, Vol. 25(2), pp.251

Caballero- Anthony, M. (2006) ‘Combating infectious diseases in East Asia: securitization and global public goods
for health and human security’, Journal on International Affairs, Spring Vol. 59(2), pp 105

Hew, Dennis. (ed.) (2005). Roadmap to an ASEAN Economic Community, Singapore: ISEAS Publications.

Kishore Mahbubani and Jeffery Sng. (2017). The ASEAN Miracle. A Catalyst For Peace: NUS Press. Singapore

Lisa Law and Fiona Miller (2018) Routledge Handbook Of Southeast Asian Development published 2018 by
Routledge. New York. NY

Mikio Oishi (2016). Contemporary Conflicts in Southeast Asia 2016. Towards a New ASEAN Way of Conflict
Management: Springer Verlag, Singapore

ASSESSMENTS

Continuous Assessment: 100%

 Presentation 20%
 Group Project 30%
 Assignment 20%
 Final Test 30%

Total 100%

1. Final Test (30%)

9
 ®FSPPP/2020/2021

The test paper It’s a take home test. Student are requied to do this final test. All total marks is (70%) will be
converted to (30%). Students are required to answer ALL. Final Test can only emphasizes between topics Chapter
1,2,5, 6. Final Test is scheduled on Test Week on Week 14 of the semester.

Activities/non face to face meetings:

a. Make early preparation for final Test.
b. Refer to suggested text book and other required materials to assist self-learning initiatives.
c. Identify group members and plan for group discussion on topics highlighted or required for further
discussion and clarification.
d. Search for past final test paper.
e. Allocate some time to answer past final test paper
f. Seek assistance from lecturers on answering techniques and notes taking.

2. Assessment – Presentation 20%

It is a group work. Each group must comprise of a 5-6 members depending on the size of the class.
Lecturers/tutors may assign any related questions from topic 3. Presentation will be individually evaluated. Total
marks are 100% and will be converted into 20%.

Discuss on COOPERATION by highlighting the main factors of the outbreak issues, parties involved, impacts and
lesson learn. Each GROUP has to choose ONE question that stated down here:

The following are the topics for the student to choose:

A. ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF)

B. ASEAN Summits
C. ASEAN Economic Community
D. ASEAN Political-Security Community
E. ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community
F. ASEAN Charter
G. Other that relevant (Consult with your respective Lecturer)

Learn the above problems/issues and the findings from the literature search, observation and interviews
conducted should be presented, and reported.

The following are the guidelines for presentation. The presentation (20%) should comprise the following
information:

a. Introduction – background of the organization

b. Factors/Issues/problem – defining the Factor or issues
c. Parties Involved – assessment on discussion on cooperations or points that could be highlighted include
positive consequences, advantages or disadvantages, or any other relevant points
d. Suggestion/ recommendation – Provide ideas to ensure that the initiative could be implemented and
continued
e. Conclusion.
f. Adhere to presentation guideline; 20 minutes allocated for presentation and 10 minutes Q&A session,
and prepare the presentation slides.
g. Refer to appendix I: Please refer Rubrics Presentation (Communication Skills) (PLO5)

3. Assessment – Assignment 20%

10
 ®FSPPP/2020/2021

It is a group work. Each group must comprise of a 5-6 members depending on the size of the class.
Lecturers/tutors may assign any related questions from topic 3-. Total marks are 100% and will be converted into
20%.

Discussion on CONFLICT by highlighting the main factors of the outbreak, parties involved, impacts and lesson
learn. Each group has to choose ONE question that stated down here:

The following are the topics for the student to choose:

A. Conflicts of Southern Thailand

B. MNLF and MILF conflict in Mindanao
C. Conflict In Rohingya, Burma
D. The Independents Of Timor Leste
E. The Spratly Island Dispute Issue
F. Terrorism in Southeast Asia
G. Human Trafficking in Southeast Asia
H. Peacekeeping Operation (ASEAN)
I. Pollution in Southeast Asia
J. Other that relevant (Consult with your respective Lecturer)

The following are the guidelines for Assignemnt guideline (20%).

1 Cover Page (Include Title, Student Name and Matric No, Group, Date of Submission)
2 Executive Summary (If appropriate – should be written last to focus on key points/findings)
3 Content of your assignment
 Introduction
 Issues/problem – defining the issues or the Conflict
 Implications – assessment on discussion on conflict or points that could be highlighted include
Factors Outbreak, advantages or disadvantages, or any other relevant points
 Suggestion/ recommendation Provide ideas to ensure that the initiative could be implemented and
continued
 Conclusion
4 Justification/Predicted Outcome or Recommendations: Support your views with at least 3-5
articles/journals from UiTM Online Library (Emerald, Ebscohost etc.) and relevant video reviews.
5 References - It is recommended that your source consists of journals, periodicals, and textual references
as well as some online research. Make sure you support your ideas with facts and figures. Please try to
use your own words and ideas based on research rather than copy and paste other’s words from the
internet.
6 You should use APA style in-line citations, image source citations, and an alphabetical CITATION LIST
in a reference section.
7 Note:Use APA format throughout your paper, Written work: 10-15 pages, Font: Times New Roman, 12
pt.
8 Refer to Appendix II: Please refer Rubrics Assignment (Problem Solving) (PLO6)

4 Group Project (Video) @ (Case Study) (30%)

Students are required to do Alalysis on specific topic which are relevant to ASEAN. Each group must comprise of
a 5-6 members depending on the size of the class. Please submit the chosen topic latest by Week 6 to be
approved by respective lecturer. Student need to do a research and fact findings on the topic which has been
selected. Respective Lecturer may CHOOSE EITHER ONE Analysis Video Project OR Analysis Case Study that
student need to do to complete the Group Project assesment

For Analysis Video Project (Video)

Student need to produce a video documentary which demonstrates a story telling on the issues based on
students’ creativity. The length of the video is (min: 15 minutes max: 20 Minutes).
The following are the guidelines for (Video) guideline (30%).

11
 ®FSPPP/2020/2021

I. Introduction – background of the issues

II. Factors/Issues/problem – definition or analysis issues
III. Parties Involved – assessment highlighted include Factors Outbreak, advantages or disadvantages,
or any other relevant points
IV. Suggestion/ recommendation – Provide ideas to ensure that the initiative could be implemented or
continued and Conclusion
V. Adhere to video guideline; min: 15 minutes max: 20 Minutes

For Analysis Case Studies (Case Study)

Student need to analysed Case that being choose by the respective lecturer. Student can analysia the issue
based on students’ creativity.

The following are the guidelines for (Case Study) guideline (30%).

I. Cover Page (Include Title, Student Name and Matric No, Group, Date of Submission)
II. Executive Summary (If appropriate – should be written last to focus on key points/findings)
III. Content of your assignment
 Introduction
 Issues/problem – defining the issues on the Case Study
 Implications – highlighted include Factors Outbreak, advantages or disadvantages, or any other
relevant points
 Suggestion/ recommendation Provide ideas to ensure that the initiative could be implemented and
continued
 Conclusion
IV. Justification/Predicted Outcome or Recommendations: Support your views with at least 3-5
articles/journals from UiTM Online Library (Emerald, Ebscohost etc.) and relevant video reviews.
V. References - It is recommended that your source consists of journals, periodicals, and textual references
as well as some online research. Make sure you support your ideas with facts and figures. Please try to
use your own words and ideas based on research rather than copy and paste other’s words from the
internet.
VI. You should use APA style in-line citations, image source citations, and an alphabetical CITATION LIST
in a reference section.
VII. Note:Use APA format throughout your paper, Written work: 15-20 pages, Font: Times New Roman, 12
pt.

Student need to submit the Group Project trough on-line during blended learning session via I-learn@Turnitin.
The proposed week for video presentation is between week 9 – 11

Refer to Appendix II:Please refer Rubrics Group Project (Video) or (Case Study) (Managerial Skills) (PLO8)

COPYRIGHT & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Students are NOT allowed to use copied books which represent a violation of the copyright laws of Malaysia.
Students are required to have a legal copy of the required text for this course.

Prepared by: Approved by:

Ahmad Shah Pakeer Mohamed Assoc Prof Dr Abdul Jalil Mohamed Ali
Resource Person Dean
Date: Date:

12
 ®FSPPP/2020/2021

Appendix I: Presentation Rubric (20%)

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

FACULTY OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE & POLICY STUDIES
SOUTHEAST ASIAN AFFAIRS / ADS560

PRESENTATION (20%) (CLO2/PLO5)

Group member (Name/Matrix number):

1.________________________________________________________________________________________
2.________________________________________________________________________________________
3.________________________________________________________________________________________
4.________________________________________________________________________________________
5.________________________________________________________________________________________
6.________________________________________________________________________________________

SCALE 1-4 5-8 6-12 13-16 17-20 MARKS

CRITERIA Very weak Weak Fair Good Very good
Clear Not able to deliver Able to deliver Able to deliver Able to Able to deliver
delivery of ideas clearly and ideas and require ideas fairly clearly deliver ideas with great
ideas require major further and require minor ideas clearly clarity 20%
improvements improvements improvements
Confident Not able to deliver Able to deliver Able to deliver Able to Able to deliver
delivery of ideas confidently ideas with limited ideas fairly deliver ideas with great
ideas confidence and confidently and ideas confidence
require further require minor confidently 20%
improvements. improvements
Effective Not able to deliver Able to deliver Able to deliver Able to Ability to deliver
and ideas effectively ideas with limited ideas fairly deliver ideas with great
articulate effect and require effectively and ideas effect and
delivery of further require minor effectively articulate
ideas improvements improvements and 20%
articulately
Not able to Able to Able to Able to Able to fully
Understand understand and understand and understand and respond to understand and
and respond to a answer questions answer questions questions respond to
respond to question but not able to satisfactorily well questions very
questions accurately answer well 20%
the question
Adapt Not able to deliver Able to deliver Able to deliver Able to Able to fully
delivery to appropriately to ideas with limited ideas deliver deliver ideas
audience the audience level appropriateness appropriately to ideas appropriately very
level to the target the target appropriatel well
audience and audience y to the
require further satisfactorily target
improvements. audience 20%
well
TOTAL: = (20%)
100%

13
 ®FSPPP/2020/2021

Appendix II: Assignment Rubric (20%)

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

FACULTY OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE & POLICY STUDIES
SOUTHEAST ASIAN AFFAIRS / ADS560

RUBRIC FOR ASSIGNMENT ( 20%) (CLO2/PLO6)

Group member (Name/Matrix number):

1.________________________________________________________________________________________
2.________________________________________________________________________________________
3.________________________________________________________________________________________
4.________________________________________________________________________________________
5.________________________________________________________________________________________
6.________________________________________________________________________________________

SCALE 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 MARKS

CRITERIA Very weak Weak Fair Good Very good
Problem Not able to Able to partially Able to explain a Independently Able to provide
Identification explain a explain a problem problem with able to explain a explanation of
problem, even with maximum minimum problem clearly problem very clearly
with assistance. assistance. assistance. without and accurately. 20%
assistance.
Analysis Not able to Finds difficulty in Able to organise Able to organise Able to organise
organise and organizing and and analyse and analyse and analyse
analyse analysing gathered gathered gathered gathered
gathered information or data information or information or information or data,
information or and finds difficulty in data, but does not data, clearly clearly describe the
data and fails to explaining the clearly describe describe the factors that
define the factors that neither the factors that some factors contribute to the
factors that contribute to the contribute to the that contribute problem/issue or
contribute to the problem/issue nor problem/issue or to the explain the root of
problem/issue explains the root of clearly explain the problem/issue the problem.
or explain the the problem. root of the or explain the
root of the problem. possible roots of 20%
problem. the problem.
Application Not able to Limited ability to Able to apply new Able to apply Able to apply new
apply any new apply new idea or idea or knowledge new idea or idea or knowledge
idea or knowledge. to a given knowledge to a to a given problem
knowledge to a problem with given problem and able to propose
given problem. assistance from independently. alternative
lecturer or applications. 20%
student.

14
 ®FSPPP/2020/2021

Not able to Able to make Able to make Able to make Able to make
Decision make decisions decisions based on decisions based good decisions excellent decisions
Making based on comparison and on comparison based on based on
comparison and contrast between and contrast comparison and comparison and
contrast information, ideas between contrast contrast between
between and available information, ideas between information, identify
information, solutions with some and available information, problems and
ideas and assistance.. solutions.. ideas and available solutions.
solutions even available 20%
with assistance. solutions.
Synthesis Fails to gather Has difficulty in Able to gather Able to gather Able to gather and
and information for gathering, relevant and thinks evaluates
Evaluation synthesis and synthesising and information, about information,
evaluation. evaluating synthesise and information, chooses a clear
information. evaluate the synthesise, able interpretation, and
information and to offer provides sufficient
offers simple, responsible evidence (quality
unsupported interpretations; and quantity) to
conclusions.task. provides support conclusions
sufficient
evidence to
support 20%
conclusions.
TOTAL: = (20%)

100%

15
 ®FSPPP/2020/2021

Appendix III: Group Project (video) @ (Case Study) Rubric (30%)

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

FACULTY OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE & POLICY STUDIES
SOUTHEAST ASIAN AFFAIRS / ADS560

RUBRIC FOR GROUP PROJECT (VIDEO) ( 30%) (CLO1/PLO8)

Group member (Name/Matrix number):

1.________________________________________________________________________________________
2.________________________________________________________________________________________
3.________________________________________________________________________________________
4.________________________________________________________________________________________
5.________________________________________________________________________________________
6.________________________________________________________________________________________

SCALE 1-4 5-8 9-12 13-16 17-20 MARKS

CRITERIA Very weak Weak Fair Good Very good
Time No attempt to Rarely completes Occasionally Completes work Completes tasks
Management complete work work on time. Not completes work on time by taking ahead of schedule
on time. Not able to manage time on time. Tries to advantage of the by creating a plan
able to manage well. manage time. time provided and and scheduling time
time by using time to complete the
management work 20%
skills.
Decision No attempt to Tries to make Satisfactory Able to make a Able to make a very
making make decision. decision by attempts to good decision good decision
Do not understanding the make decisions based on good based on excellent
understand the situation. Decision and satisfactory understanding of understanding of
situation and made is based on understanding the situation and the situation and
relate with limited of the situation available options. available options.
options that are understanding of the and available
available. situation and options 20%
available options.
Organization Deliver ideas Deliver ideas with Deliver ideas Deliver ideas with Deliver ideas with
of ideas unclearly, minimal clarity, with satisfactory good clarity, excellent clarity,
loosely and comprehensiveness clarity, comprehensivene comprehensiveness
disorganized. and organization comprehensive ss and and organization
ness and organization. 20%
organization.

16
 ®FSPPP/2020/2021

Delegation of Work was not Work was divided Work was Work was divided Work was divided
work divided equally. minimally amongst divided well amongst excellently amongst
Only few group members. satisfactorily group members. group members.
members are amongst group
doing the work members.
while others are 20%
ignored.
Motivation No motivation to Minimal motivation Satisfactory High motivation to Very high
complete task. to complete task. motivation to complete task. motivation to
complete task. complete task. 20%
TOTAL: = (30%)
100%

17