Risk Culture and Risk Attitude

1|Page
Executive Summary
Risk culture must first be identified to address it adequately. Risk culture is the framework of
principles and practices in an organization, which influences governance and executive risk
considerations. A shared perception of an organization and it's commercial intent is an aspect of
the risk culture. Companies should also ensure good ethics and risk communication. To shift the
risk culture, workers need consistently and regularly to be advised that risk management is an
integral part of their daily obligations (Huber, 2012). Communication should include
collaborating on how to consistently enhance the functioning of the risk and the business sector
to ensure that accurate knowledge about risks is communicated around the organization. Ethical
behavior is a central component of a high-risk community, and the nature of structured ethics
systems and the ethical actions of staff are strongly related to this activity (Greenberg and
Lowrie, 2013). For third parties to manage risks within a framework or to reach their risk
expectations, risk culture can spread to third party suppliers and partners outside the company. In
addition to this, companies should consider the risk by having a sense of whether the applicants
fit in with the risk culture of the business. A good risk culture within an enterprise ensures that
workers know the limits within which a business should work and freely address the risks to
fulfill the company's long-term strategic objectives (Alexander, 2019).

2|Page
Table of Contents
Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................2

Introduction......................................................................................................................................4

How does risk attitude influence risk culture or vice versa?.......................................................5

Requirements to build a good Risk Culture with a project team.................................................6

What does a good risk culture look like?.....................................................................................8

Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................10

References......................................................................................................................................11

3|Page
Introduction
Risk Culture, while commonly understood in conflicts, involves beliefs, opinions, awareness,
and risk comprehension, shared by the company in general. It is seen how the organization, in
the sense of financial, strategic, business and investment, and enterprise-wide, responds to
uncertainty and risk. Suitable risk culture can vary between organizations and sectors. However,
it is aligned with the business plan and ensures a risk attitude to all members of the company in
the manner anticipated by senior management and the board. Although the governance, risk, and
enforcement structure are critical for institutional execution and activity, having a suitable risk
culture helps to shift from mere enforcement to something that generates value for an enterprise
(Roeschmann, 2014).

4|Page
 How does risk attitude influence risk culture or vice versa?
The transition of attitude following the global financial crisis was also the most outstanding and
longest-lasting effort to address the transformation in the financial services sector. Much like all
systemic improvements, it is necessary to look at the way the transition was introduced in the
corporation and figure out how it was eventually implemented effectively. Attitudes and
behaviors are often difficult to determine. Still, the introduction of a risk tolerance system and
the management and senior staff leadership from above will contribute to cultivating a more
connected mentality among workers (Huber, 2012).

The most critical global frameworks for corporate governance enable companies to consider and
track their business risk cultures. A risk culture should promote the application of systems in risk
assessment and integrate risks with the design and decision making in strategies. This process
continues with risk behaviors and attitudes all over the company. Enterprise risk management is
considered a rigorous risk and incentive management approach within the enterprise to improve
company efficiency in an organized and structured way. The centralized risk management
process has to be useful for all workers in the company. Therefore, it can be argued that
incorporation of risk into corporate decision-making is an imperative element in achieving
organizational goals (Roeschmann, 2014).

Risk attitude is the listed risk-influenced status of a person or community. Risk activity involves
objective risk assessments, including decision-making based on threats, threats, mechanisms,
correspondence, etc. risk-related behavior. Risk culture is that a community of people with a
shared intent share the values, interests, experience, and perception of risk. Risk culture impacts
risk attitude in the following manner, both organizationally and at lower divisions. These impacts
could also be observed as vice versa (Greenberg and Lowrie, 2013).

 Risk culture influences the appetite for threats, making practical and operational judgments
about the danger to be faced in a variety of circumstances and conditions.
 Risk culture impacts risk-related behaviors, influencing the role of individuals and
communities to be dangerous or critical in contexts.
 Culture of risk guides the formulation of goals and plans in a context and an unpredictable
world where key decision-makers strive to assess the optimal path (Alexander, 2019).

5|Page
 Risk culture defines the opportunity to 'take the right chances wisely' as it impacts risk
management, processes, and practices' efficacy.
 Risk culture can avoid the possibility of fraud, which may occur if leaders put out
contradictory signals at a reasonable risk level (Bucciol and Miniaci, 2013).

Both of these can be represented and evaluated on their own using validated models and
framings, in multiple realms of risk, human factors, risk attitude, and emotion. However, these
experiences play a crucial role in deciding the efficacy of each particular component. All aspects
of this dynamic platform must be understood and managed by individuals, organizations, and
associations who need to ensure that risk mitigation is successful (Greenberg and Lowrie, 2013).
Unconscious and unmanaged risk behavior poses a significant challenge for people and
organizations' ability to reach their targets. Developing individual and group, emotional
intelligence provides a road to knowing and controlling risk behavior, reaping the exact rewards,
and providing a foundation for continuing development and improved productivity in risk
management (Alexander, 2019).

Requirements to build a good Risk Culture with a project team

Established risk culture into a project community decreases the total risk management burden on
a new initiative by providing a standardized list of standard modules and resources. It is much
easier over time to refine and function successfully within the broader community. When anyone
will implement – or even familiarize – instruction to a broader community of peers, their
communication would be more effective (Huber, 2012). When a risk assessment is part of
corporate philosophy, an inventory of information can continue to be established to take
advantage of previous operations. Trends and indications that can be used to change plans and
procedures and advise metrics and assessments can begin to emerge. It should continue by
strengthening the budget and the timetable, thus reducing over-runs (Alexander, 2019).

Conscientious behavior is a direct product of a risk-conscious society. Effective decision-making

would be a subtler consequence. More evidence and an understanding of the character of
confusion will guide it. The assessment of the scenarios continues to see more coherence, putting
risk rather than a stand-alone and maybe distracting side issue as a core business challenge
(Bucciol and Miniaci, 2013). The great successes come from better management, with little to no
running cost. The evidentiary approach to planning, implementation of plans, and policymaking
6|Page
would lead to better, more risk-based decisions. And risk methodologies would also improve the
monitoring and transparency of actions with high risks (Engemann and Engemann, 2017).

The following components can play a vital role in building an influential risk culture within a
project team.

 Control

Like any transition, creating this transformation takes dedication from an organization's top. It is
not only top administrators but is also those who supervise them: politicians and government
officials in the public sector, corporate trustees, and private non-executive officers. If the people
at the top do not respect the idea of effective risk management, there are no efficient procedures
and best practices and tools and models (Greenberg and Lowrie, 2013).

 Regulation

A culture of risk has strategies that underlie it, but leave them as simple as possible. They must
represent the essence and risks of our business. Our strategies should define obligations at the
highest level and, in particular, which will help risk management execution and maintenance at
the highest level. The consequences of governance suggest that we have to understand how
danger at the Board level is being tracked (Roeschmann, 2014).

 Proceedings

We need to build systems that meet our company's needs. We are more likely to do for a
straightforward and well-used method than a lengthy one that is quickly discarded or seldom
used. They must be adequately reported, widely disseminated, and periodically reviewed. But
most critically, our systems need to be incorporated into enabling infrastructures such as
software, specifications, contract models and technologies, monitoring and escalation
mechanisms, and how we interact with our organizations, our current project and projects
management processes, and all our information management, personnel recruitment and training
mechanisms (Huber, 2012).

 Functions

7|Page
We must build training and development systems to establish a community of people with
similar knowledge, language, and toolset. Set up new expertise after training and improve their
abilities, judgment, and understanding. Maintain your career growth by enabling experiences and
learning to be shared. We need to build a range of tools to address the needs of our organization.
The most significant is the vulnerability tracker, but many others are available to sophisticate and
expensive tech applications on the business scale (Alexander, 2019).

 Endorsement

Here's the old saying that "what is weighed is handled." If we do not track and capture risk
assessment data, there would be no reason for individuals to follow these criteria. Likewise, if
senior management and our organization's governing structures do not analyze the intelligence
they receive and apply what they hear, we will accept bad results (Engemann and Engemann,
2017). Easy benefits are accessible and, above all, ensuring those employees have a good view of
their goals and that aspirations are part of the working environment. This involves the design of
an assessment loop to learn from our results and to change our risk strategies. It is also valuable
to interact with others, to measure our success in culture growth and the execution of our
processes (Bucciol and Miniaci, 2013).

What does a good risk culture look like?

One of the most notable features of a company having a good risk culture is the dedicated
management board and managing director, who agree that risk management is a central company
function and not a subordinate duty to the risk manager. This board is not complacent and holds
a sense of uncertainty. It is not complacent. This is an enormously valuable principle since the
board has to consider the likelihood of self-sufficiency as problems happen. The following
features are also observed in a sound risk culture (Greenberg and Lowrie, 2013).

 An understanding that risk management is a critical factor for corporate growth, not merely a
legal necessity.
 None without proper authorization trials if something goes incorrect, or anyone does blow a
whistle to people if they do wrong, i.e., the problem goes dealt with "fairly, reasonably and in
a regulated manner" (Bucciol and Miniaci, 2013).
 A risk assessment task process that is vigorously pursued.

8|Page
 Specific risk procedures, systems, obligations, i.e., the primary risk control considerations,
have been introduced.
 Suitable HR activities that identify and discuss appropriate risk management practices
(Alexander, 2019).
 A robust 'risk scanner' and continuous tracking of anything that could be incorrect in the
internal and external context.
 There are shared risk assessment principles.
 The risk policy is a substantial leadership activity-workers experience and senses it.
 Senior management engages actively in the growth of the capability of risk management.
 The informal presence may have a considerable effect on the platform and junior
management (Roeschmann, 2014).
 An efficient compromise between the desire to keep others accountable for guilty loss and
the understanding that failures exist – and that they must be publicly recorded to benefit from
such mistake.
 Praise is necessary, but it should provide rewards for good behavior since it is transparent
about the personal implications of bad conduct.
 Transparent and immediate vulnerability knowledge without fear of responsibility flows up
and down the enterprise (Huber, 2012).

Both these aspects may continue to instill the value of organization-wide risk control,
contributing to actions aimed at reducing social risks. This is achieved by aggressive actions to
make sure employees appreciate their role in handling risks at any stage of the organization. This
is only true of humans, even earthly ones, who make choices where risk is an essential factor that
must always be taken into consideration. Like ads, risk management is everyone's business
(Engemann and Engemann, 2017).

9|Page
Conclusion
At present, the emphasis is strongly oriented towards the conceptual and systemic aspects of risk
management and compliance with regulations. Accounting for persons rather than boards where
responsibility is sometimes lost must be transparent and implemented. The emphasis should be
on what happened, what can be improved, and whether process improvements or checks are
needed. To promote open dialogue, treat the discipline or assignment of duties as a particular
issue. A company plan and core competencies should be guided by risk culture. The
effectiveness of a plan resides in direct relation to the culture of the organization. If they are not
compatible beforehand, it is necessary to change one to change the other.

10 | P a g e
References
Alexander, S., 2019. Regulating Risk Culture in Banks. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Bucciol, A., and Miniaci, R., 2013. Financial Risk Attitude, Business Cycles, and Perceived Risk
Exposure. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Engemann, K., and Engemann, K., 2017. Risk attitude chain: safety climate, risk attitude, and
risk decisions. International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, 7(3), p.211.

Greenberg, M., and Lowrie, K., 2013. Sheila Jasanoff: Culture and Diversity in Risk
Management. Risk Analysis, 33(7), pp.1179-1181.

Huber, W., 2012. Culture Risk: An Exploratory Study of the Influence of Culture on Auditors'
Evaluation of Internal Control and Assessment of Control Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Roeschmann, A., 2014. Risk Culture: What It Is and How It Affects an Insurer's Risk
Management: Risk Management and Insurance Review, 17(2), pp.277-296.

11 | P a g e