Professional Documents
Culture Documents
22 June 2010
Background
• Two years ago, a pharmaceutical client finished construction on a new
LEED certified building in New England.
• The facility’s air handlers were custom-fabricated and employed
economizers without pre-heaters upstream of the water-based coils.
• Without pre-heaters, the air handlers were much more energy efficient.
• The air handler manufacturer believed that their design was capable of
adequately mixing warm RETURN air with 30% cold OUTSIDE air
effectively enough to prevent coil freezing.
• During the first year of operation, freezestat alarms shut most of the
units down during several cold winter days.
• The client asked that we model their air handlers to:
– Understand the issues with the current design, and
– Provide them with a redesign that would be immune to cold climatic conditions.
Case 1: Parameters
• Star CCM+ software was used to model an Economizer/Air Handling
Unit installed on a LEED silver certified building in the
pharmaceutical industry.
• Given Values:
– Air Flow CFM = 51,100 CFM
– 30% Outside Air and Temperature = 0ºF
– Supply Air Temperature Target = 55ºF
• Assumptions:
– Return Air Temperature = 70ºF
Case 1
Supply Fan
Return Fan
Return Air Enters Humidifier Spray Nozzles
Blenders
Outside Air Enters Cooling Coils
Pre-Filters
Case 1
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Geometric Plan View
Supply Fan
Return Air
Enters
Supply Fan
Blenders
Humidifier Spray Nozzles
Return Air
Enters
Supply Fan
Cooling Coils
Case 1
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Relative Pressure Contour – Side Elevation View
∆P =0.23 in WG ∆P =0.48 in WG
P ≈ 0 in WG
Case 1
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Velocity Vectors – Side Elevation View
Blenders Pre-Filters Cooling Coils Humidifier Spray Nozzles
Case 1
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Velocity Vectors – Close up Side Elevation View
Conclusions
• The model shows that there’s still a probability of the top cooling coil
to freeze compared to a design without blenders.
– The temperatures in the supply chamber range from 65ºF down to
26ºF, with an average discharge temperature of 44ºF.
– A simple mixing model calculates the discharge temperature at
49.2°F. (assuming perfect mixing)
Case 2: Parameters
• Star CCM+ software was used to model the Economizer.
• Given Values:
– Air Flow CFM = 51,100 CFM
– 30% Outside Air and Temperature = 0ºF
– Supply Air Temperature Target = 55ºF
• Assumptions:
– Return Air Temperature = 70ºF
Return Air
Enters
Supply Fan
New Location for Blenders
Humidifier Spray Nozzles
Return Air
Enters
Supply Fan
Cooling Coils
Case 2
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Cooling Coil Face Temperature – Front Elevation View
Cooling Coils
(min & max values)
Case 2
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Cooling Coil Face Temperature – Front Elevation View
Cooling Coils
(cold spots below 35°F)
Case 2
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Cooling Coil Face Temperatures at Various Heights
35°
Conclusions – Case 2
• This Economizer model shows that there’s still a probability of the
cooling coils to freeze.
– The temperatures in the supply chamber range from 63ºF down to
26ºF, with an average discharge temperature of 43ºF.
– Temperature distribution at coil faces was shifted to slightly higher
temperatures.
Case 3: Parameters
• Star CCM+ software was used to model the Economizer.
• Given Values:
– Air Flow CFM = 51,100 CFM
– 30% Outside Air and Temperature = 0ºF
– Supply Air Temperature Target = 55ºF
• Assumptions:
– Return Air Temperature = 70ºF
Return Air
Enters
Supply Fan
New Location for Blenders
(5” from floor) Humidifier Spray Nozzles
Return Air
Enters
Supply Fan
Cooling Coils
Case 3
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Cooling Coil Face Temperature – Front Elevation View
Cooling Coils
(min & max values)
Case 3
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Cooling Coil Face Temperature – Front Elevation View
Cooling Coils
(cold spots below 35°F)
Case 3
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Cooling Coil Face Temperatures at Various Heights
35°
Case 1 Case 3
Case 2
Case 3
Conclusions
• This Economizer model shows that there’s still a probability of the
cooling coils to freeze.
– The temperatures in the supply chamber range from 58ºF down to
28ºF, with an average discharge temperature of 43ºF.
Added Vanes
Return Air
Enters
Perturbation Airfoil
Blenders Pre-Filters
Case 4
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Geometric Front Elevation View
Added Vanes
Perturbation
Airfoil
Supply Fan
Cooling Coils
Blenders Pre-Filters
Case 4
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Temperature Contour – Side Elevation View
Cooling Coils
Case 4
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Cooling Coil Face Temperature – Front Elevation View
Cooling Coils
(min & max values)
Case 4
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Cooling Coil Face Temperatures at Various Heights
35°
Case 4
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Relative Pressure Contour – Side Elevation View
∆P =0.26 in WG ∆P =0.48 in WG
P ≈ 0 in WG
∆P =0.33 in WG
Case 4
Conclusions
• With the added vanes before the Blenders increases the cooling coil
face temperature up to 35ºF.
• Still a small possibility that the cooling coils might freeze on the lower
right cooling coil.
• Given Values:
– Air Flow CFM = 51,100 CFM
– 30% Outside Air and Temperature = 0ºF
– Supply Air Temperature Target = 55ºF
• Assumptions:
– Return Air Temperature = 70ºF
Case 5: Parameters
• Kept the Blender 5” from the floor
• Kept the vanes below the outside air damper.
• Kept the perturbation airfoil.
• Mirrored the right blender (when looking downstream towards the
supply fan in the air handling unit.)
Case 5
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Geometric Side Elevation View
Outside Air Enters
Cooling Coils
Vanes
Perturbation
Airfoil
Return Air
Enters
Blenders Pre-Filters
Case 5
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Geometric Isometric View
Vanes
Perturbation
Airfoil
Return Air
Enters
Supply Fan
Blenders
Cooling Coils
Mirrored Blender Pre-Filters
Case 5
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Geometric Isometric View
Outside Air Enters
Vanes
Perturbation
Airfoil
Return Air
Enters
Pre-Filters
Blenders
Mirrored Blender
Case 5
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Temperature Contour – Side Elevation View
Cooling Coils
Case 5
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Cooling Coil Face Temperature – Front Elevation View
Cooling Coils
(35º - max value)
Case 5
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Cooling Coil Face Temperatures at Various Heights
∆P =0.41 in WG
P ≈ 0 in WG
∆P =0.40 in WG
Case 5
Conclusions
• With the added vanes below the outside air damper, a perturbation
airfoil and mirrored rotation of one blender, this model shows that the
minimum temperature across the cooling coil is calculated to be 42ºF.
• The average supply temperature discharge is calculated to be 46ºF
whereas the theoretical perfect mixing case would be 49.24°F.
• An added bonus to this design shows that the mirrored blender
enhances the temperature distribution on the cooling coils to be more
symmetrical left to right.
Case 6: Parameters
• Star CCM+ software was used to model the Economizer.
• Given Values:
– Air Flow CFM = 51,100 CFM
– 20% Outside Air and Temperature = 0ºF
– Supply Air Temperature Target = 55ºF
• Assumptions:
– Return Air Temperature = 70ºF
Case 6: Parameters
• Kept the Blender 5” from the floor
• Kept the vanes below the outside air damper.
• Kept the perturbation airfoil.
• Kept the mirrored right blender (when looking down towards the
supply fan in the air handling unit.)
Case 6
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Geometric Side Elevation View
20% Outside Air Enters
Cooling Coils
Vanes
Perturbation
Airfoil
Return Air
Enters
Blenders Pre-Filters
Case 6
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Geometric Isometric View
Vanes
Perturbation
Airfoil
Return Air
Enters
Supply Fan
Blenders
Cooling Coils
Mirrored Blender Pre-Filters
Case 6
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Temperature Contour – Side Elevation View
Cooling Coils
Case 6
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Cooling Coil Face Temperature – Front Elevation View
Cooling Coils
(35º - max value)
Case 6
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Cooling Coil Face Temperatures at Various Heights
∆P =0.40in WG
P ≈ 0 in WG
∆P =0.38 in WG
Case 6
Conclusions
• With the added vanes below the outside air damper, a perturbation
airfoil and mirrored rotation of one blender, this model shows that the
minimum temperature across the cooling coil is calculated to be 47ºF.
• The average supply temperature discharge is calculated to be 55ºF.
Case 7: Parameters
• Star CCM+ software was used to model the Economizer.
• Given Values:
– Air Flow CFM = 51,100 CFM
– 50% Outside Air and Temperature = 35ºF
– Supply Air Temperature Target = 55ºF
• Assumptions:
– Return Air Temperature = 70ºF
Case 7: Parameters
• Kept the Blender 5” from the floor
• Kept the vanes below the outside air damper.
• Kept the perturbation airfoil.
• Kept the mirrored right blender (when looking down towards the
supply fan in the air handling unit.)
Case 7
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Geometric Side Elevation View
50% Outside Air Enters @ 35ºF
Cooling Coils
Vanes
Perturbation
Airfoil
Return Air
Enters
Blenders Pre-Filters
(5” above floor)
Case 7
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Geometric Isometric View
Vanes
Perturbation
Airfoil
Return Air
Enters
Supply Fan
Blenders
Cooling Coils
Mirrored Blender Pre-Filters
Case 7
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Temperature Contour – Side Elevation View
Cooling Coils
Case 7
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Cooling Coil Face Temperature – Front Elevation View
Cooling Coils
(35º - max value)
Case 7
Custom Air Handler without Pre-Heating
Cooling Coil Face Temperatures at Various Heights
Conclusions
• With the added vanes below the outside air damper, a perturbation
airfoil and mirrored rotation of one blender, this model shows that the
minimum temperature across the cooling coil is calculated to be 52ºF.
• The average supply temperature discharge is calculated to be 52ºF.
Summary
• Four air handler design variations were evaluated for their resistance to
coil freezing.
• The proportion of outside air was also evaluated at 20%, 30% and 50%
at two temperatures.
• The final design variation shows very good resistance to freezing down
to temperatures of 0 °F (-18°C) and below.
• The new design was implemented on all but one air handler at the
facility.
• Last winter’s operation saw no freeze-stat alerts for the retrofitted
equipment, but several shutdowns for the unaltered unit.