CC0003 POSTER FEEDBACK FORM

Please see below for feedback on your poster assignment.

Student Name/ Matriculation Number: Michelle

General: Main Argument, Rebuttal, Development of Argument

Counterargument
No clear thesis statement / argument presented
Opinions/examples/ summary has ¨
been provided in place of main
arguments. ¨ Some expression of point of view/position/thesis
statement, however this could have been more
Main arguments are explicitly developed and justified. x
irrelevant/inappropriate/ lack logical
flow ¨ Sufficiently clear expression of view/position
/thesis statement in relation to the question,
Main arguments are largely that was developed fairly consistently
relevant/appropriate/ offer logical throughout the material. ¨
flow x
Mostly clear and coherent view/position/thesis
Rebuttals are often statement was established in relation to the
irrelevant/inappropriate/lack logical question, and a robust position was fairly
flow.¨ consistently presented throughout the material.
¨
Rebuttals are mostly
relevant/appropriate/ offer logical
flow. x

Counter-arguments
irrelevant/inappropriate/lack logical
flow. ¨

Counter-arguments are mostly

relevant/appropriate/ offer logical
flow. x

Relevance/Addressing the Question Supporting your claims/Using Evidence

The material used was not relevant to Insufficient clear evidence to support
the question. ¨ claims/assertion/ideas presented in essay. ¨

The material used was relevant to the
topic in a very general way, but did
not make clear how it was relevant to
the specific question/title. ¨
Some evidence was provided, but explicit links to
claims/assertions/ideas could be
clearer/developed more. x
For the most part, there was relevant and
appropriate use of evidence that was clearly and

1
The material used was mostly
relevant to the specific issues that
were the focus of the question but
could have been better elaborated.
x
Organisation & Structure
Material is not well-linked and/or
relevantly connected. ¨
Material was fairly well-linked and
relevantly connected. ¨
Material was mostly coherently and
consistently linked throughout. x
Use of Language
Too many spelling, grammar, or
punctuation errors ¨
Language used was unclear or difficult
to follow ¨
Structure and prose was clear, but
language is too colloquial ¨
Writing style is mostly consistent,
clear, with appropriate tone x
Writing style and use of language are
clear, consistent and appropriate ¨
convincingly presented to support the main
claims/assertions/ideas presented in the essay.
¨
Critical Evaluation
The material presented was largely descriptive –
there was not enough analysis (e.g.: assessment
of the value or significance of what was
described or discussed). ¨
Argument/ rebuttal /counter could have been
more analytical ¨
Fairly systematic, reasoned, and justified
argument/rebuttal/counter x
Systematic, reasoned, and justified
argument/rebuttal/counter ¨
Referencing/Citations
No citations used ¨
No bibliography used x
Irrelevant / inappropriate citations used x
Relevant / appropriate citations used ¨
Incorrect bibliography style used ¨
Mostly correct bibliography style with some
mistakes ¨
Correct bibliography style was used ¨
2
 General Comments:

It’s clear you have a good grasp of the key concepts and I thought there was potential in
the discussion around intercultural dialogue but here I felt you could have said more on
the nature of this – what does it entail, when is it truly valuable, how does it actually help –
there’s a clearly a distinction between what something is meant to achieve and whether it
actually achieves this and how so. I also noted there was no bibliography and the poster
citations were not done correctly.