CHAPTER IV

DATA AND DATA ANALYSIS

A. Data Collecting

The data were collected by giving the students multiple choice test

that consists of twenty items. The correct answer get point 5 and incorrect

answer get pointt 0, so the total of the right answer get point 100. In this

research, the sample was divided into two group, the experimental group

and control group. Twenty nine students belong to experimental group and

thirty two students belong to control group. Each group was given pre-test

and post-test.

This is the result of the pre-test and post-test in experimental group

in the table 4.1 and that is result of the pre-test and post-test in control

group in table 4.2.

Table 4.1
The Score of Pre-test and Post-test of the Experimental Group

No Initial Score
Name Pre-test Post-test X1-X2
X1 X2
1 AMA 70 95 25
2 AM 60 80 20
3 AZ 60 70 10
4 ASA 65 80 15
5 AR 60 80 20
6 CWR 60 85 25
7 DS 50 70 20
8 DFA 60 95 35
9 DA 65 80 15
10 IAN 60 80 20
 11 KA 70 85 15
12 MP 60 80 20
13 JJC 60 85 25
14 MWAL 70 90 20
15 MMS 60 80 20
16 NA 50 80 30
17 NH 65 75 10
18 NA 40 80 40
19 NA 50 80 30
20 PU 55 80 25
21 RAA 65 85 20
22 RDK 60 80 20
23 RA 50 75 25
24 SEZ 70 90 20
25 SR 70 80 10
26 SY 75 85 10
27 SW 70 85 15
28 TA 60 80 20
29 TRU 50 80 30
SUM 1760 2370 610

The data in table 4.1 showed that the highest score of pre-test in
experimental group was 75 and the lowest was 50 while the highest score
of post-test was 95 and the lowest was 70.

Table 4.2
The Score of Pre-test and Post-test of the Control Group

No Initial Name Score

Pre-test Post-test Y1-Y2
Y1 Y2
1 AK 60 80 20
2 AA 60 80 20
3 AM 40 75 35
4 AP 65 85 20
5 CA 60 80 20
6 DR 75 90 15
7 DR 60 80 20
8 DV 50 85 35
9 DZ 60 80 20
 10 JH 65 75 10
11 KL 60 85 25
12 LC 70 85 15
13 MFD 65 80 15
14 MAW 50 80 30
15 MR 55 85 30
16 RS 60 90 30
17 MRH 50 80 30
18 MPR 60 75 15
19 RM 70 80 10
20 RRF 55 85 30
21 TR 65 80 15
22 TRY 60 80 20
23 YR 65 75 10
24 WS 60 80 20
25 RG 70 90 20
26 RK 75 80 5
27 GUT 70 80 10
28 GAD 60 85 25
29 FIT 60 85 25
30 WID 65 75 10
31 RKD 65 80 15
32 WDS 50 95 45
SUM 1955 2620 665

The data in table 4.2 showed that the highest score of pre-test in
experimental group was 75 and the lowest was 40 while the highest score
of post-test was 95 and the lowest was 75.
B. Data Analysis

Based on the data the pre-test and post-test, the score was changed

into the table of calculation of standart deviation.

Table 4.3
The Calculation Table of Standart Deviation of post-test in the
Experimental Group
No Initial Score
Name Pre-test Post-test X12 X22 X1.X2
X1 X2
1 AMA 70 95 4900 9025 6650
 2 AM 60 80 3600 6400 4800
3 AZ 60 70 3600 4900 4200
4 ASA 65 80 4225 6400 5200
5 AR 60 80 3600 6400 4800
6 CWR 60 85 3600 7225 5100
7 DS 50 70 2500 4900 3500
8 DFA 60 95 3600 9025 5700
9 DA 65 80 4225 6400 5200
10 IAN 60 80 3600 6400 4800
11 KA 70 85 4900 7225 5950
12 MP 60 80 3600 6400 4800
13 JJC 60 85 3600 7225 5100
14 MWAL 70 90 4900 8100 6300
15 MMS 60 80 3600 6400 4800
16 NA 50 80 2500 6400 4000
17 NH 65 75 4225 5625 4875
18 NA 40 80 1600 6400 3200
19 NA 50 80 2500 6400 4000
20 PU 55 80 3025 6400 4400
21 RAA 65 85 4225 7225 5525
22 RDK 60 80 3600 6400 4800
23 RA 50 75 2500 5625 5525
24 SEZ 70 90 4900 8100 3750
25 SR 70 80 4900 6400 5600
26 SY 75 85 5625 7225 6375
27 SW 70 85 4900 7225 5950
28 TA 60 80 3600 6400 4800
29 TRU 50 80 2500 6400 4000
SUM 1760 2370 108650 194650 143700

Table 4.4
The Calculation Table of Standart Deviation of post-test in the
Control Group
No Initial Name Score
Pre-test Post-test Y1 Y2 Y1.Y2
Y1 Y2
1 AK 60 80 3600 6400 4800
2 AA 60 80 3600 6400 4800
3 AM 40 75 1600 5625 3000
 4 AP 65 85 4225 7225 5525
5 CA 60 80 3600 6400 4800
6 DR 75 90 5625 8100 6750
7 DR 60 80 3600 6400 4800
8 DV 50 85 2500 7225 4250
9 DZ 60 80 3600 6400 4800
10 JH 65 75 4225 5625 4875
11 KL 60 85 3600 7225 5950
12 LC 70 85 4900 7225 5100
13 MFD 65 80 4225 6400 5200
14 MAW 50 80 2500 6400 4000
15 MR 55 85 3025 7225 4675
16 RS 60 90 3600 8100 5400
17 MRH 50 80 2500 6400 4000
18 MPR 60 75 3600 5625 4500
19 RM 70 80 4900 6400 5600
20 RRF 55 85 3025 7225 4250
21 TR 65 80 4225 6400 4675
22 TRY 60 80 3600 6400 4800
23 YR 65 75 4225 5625 4875
24 WS 60 80 3600 6400 4800
25 RG 70 90 4900 8100 6300
26 RK 75 80 5625 6400 6000
27 GUT 70 80 4900 6400 5600
28 GAD 60 85 3600 7225 5100
29 FIT 60 85 3600 7225 5100
30 WID 65 75 4225 5625 4875
31 RKD 65 80 4225 6400 5200
32 WDS 50 95 2500 9025 4750
SUM 1955 2620 121275 215250 159150

1. Calculation the mean of the experimental group

ƩX
M1 =
N

610
=
29

= 21.03
 2. Calculation the mean of the control group

ƩY
M2 =
N

665
=
32

= 20.78

C. Testing Hypothesis

The basic of testing hypothesis in this research were:

If t-observed > t-table, the hypothesis will be accepted.

If t-observed < t-table, the hypothesis will be rejected.

In this research, the value of t-table for the degree of freedom (df) 58 at

level of significance (a) 0.005 was 2.000.

The result of computing t-test shows that t-observed (t-obs) is higher than

t-table as follows:

t-obs > t-table (α = 0.05;df=58)

6.11 > 2.000 (α = 0.05;df=58)

Based on the data above, the writer concluded that alternative hypothesis

(Ha) is accepted and null hypoyhesis (Ho) is rejected. It means that “ there

is a significant effect applying Metacognitive strategy on students reading

comprehension’’