FAMILY

NURSING
CARE PLAN
CHN RLE
GROUP 1
Topic Outline
INITIAL DATA BASE

FAMILY NURSING
CARE PLAN
 I. CHARACTERS:
A. What is the type of family structures?
_______ Nuclear _______ Patriarchal ___X__ Single Parent
______ Extended _______ Matriarchal
B. Who makes decision regarding health care? _Mother_
C. What is the present family relationship?
_________________ with conflicts between members
_______X__________ without conflicts between family
members
D.Activities of daily living:

Initial data • Sleeping pattern:

Retiring/getting up hours 10pm/8am

base (1)
Nap during the day 3pm
Do members sleep together No
2. Eating pattern
How many meals each day? 5
Who appears overweight? None
Who appears underweight? None
3. Leisure time activities
How does each member spend leisure hours? Normally spend
time watching movies individually
Is it appropriate for the sex and age group? YES_
What is the effect to the family? It works well with our setup
Any joint activity for leisure? We normally spend time eating
home cooked meals together
 II. FAMILY
INFORMATION
Head of the family: Myrna G. Bagang
Address: 324 Purok 4 Lanang Candaba Pampanga
Members of the household: 4
NAME RELATIONSHIP AGE EDUCATIONAL
ATTAINMENT

Myrna G. Bagang Mother 65 High School Graduate

Jessie Rey G. Bagang Son 31 College Graduate

Jessiemyr G. Bagang Daugther 36 College Graduate

Rhodel G. Bagang Son 47 College Level

 III. SOCIO-ECONOMIC
AND CULTURAL
FACTORS
NAME OCCUPATION PLACE INCOME

Jessiemyr G. Bagang DENTAL NURSE KUWAIT 30,000-40,000

Rhodel G. Bagang CARPENTER CANDABA 10,000-15,000

• Does the working family member meet the basic necessities? __X____ Yes _____ No
• Who makes decisions regarding money matters? _______Mother_____________
• Religious affiliation: _______Roman Catholic___
• what roles does the family play in the community? It is the basic unit of the society_____
 IV.
ENVIRONMENTAL
FACTORS
A. Housing
 V. HEALTH MEDICAL HISTORY
NAME PAST ILLNESS ILLNESS STATE HEALTH ACTION TAKEN

Myra Bagang (Mother) Hypertension Ongoing • Lifetime Maintenance using

prescription drugs
• Regular monitoring of Blood
Pressure

Diabetes Ongoing • Regular monitoring of blood

sugar levels using glucometer
• Avoid sweet foods and monitor
other food intake
• Regular monthly check up with
assigned physician
 VI. VALUE PLACED ON
PREVENTION OF DISEASE
NAME AGE COMPLETE INCOMPLETE

Myrna G. Bagang 65

Jessie Rey G. Bagang 31

Rhodel G. Bagang 47

Jessiemyr G. Bagang 36

Preventive practices employed by the family: _Yearly Check up________

Sources of Health Care:
_________ Health Center ____________ Government Hospital
____X_____ Private Hospital ____________ Others
Scale for Ranking
Health Problems
According to
Priorities
 SCORING

-Decide on score for each criteria

- Drive the score by the highest possible score and multiply by weight
Score X Weight
Highest Score
-Sum up the scores for all criteria. The highest score is 5,
equivalent to the total weight
 SCORING
PROBLEM #1 : Rampant presence of mosquitoes in the community as a potential health threat

NAME PAST ILLNESS ILLNESS STATE

1. Nature of the Problem Computation: Justification:

High Score: 3 The presence of the mosquitoes in the

Actual Score: 2
Weight: 1
Score x Weight = 2 x 1
Highest Score = 3
community poses a threat specially for toddlers
and infants as it can bring common diseases
(such as dengue) which can be a threat to the
low immunity of these children.

Result: 0.67

2. Modifiability of the Computation: Justification:

Problem High Score: 3

Actual Score: 1
Weight: 1
Score x Weight = 1 x 2
Highest Score = 3
This is partially modifiable given the condition
that the problem is nature-bound. But efforts
of the local barangay have provided necessary
measures to prevent chances of dengue
outbreak.

Result: 1
NAME PAST ILLNESS ILLNESS STATE

3. Preventive Potential Computation: Justification:

High Score: 3 Rampant presence of mosquitoes has been in the

Actual Score: 1 community for decades as it is located near a river
Weight: 1 which can no longer prevent such conditions given
the current location of the community.
Score x Weight = 1 x 1
Highest Score = 3

Result: 0.33

4. Salience Computation: Justification:

High Score:2 The family views this as a problem, not needing

Actual Score: 1 immediate attention as there have been recent local
Weight: 1 government projects addressing this concern.

Score x Weight = 1 x 1
Highest Score = 2

Result: 0.5

TOTAL Nature of the Problem: 0.66

Modifiability of the Problem: 1
Preventive Potential: 0.33
Salience: 0.5

Result: 3.17
 SCORING
PROBLEM #2 : Hypertension as health deficit

NAME PAST ILLNESS ILLNESS STATE

1. Nature of the Problem Computation: Justification:

High Score: 3 It is a health deficit that requires immediate

Actual Score: 3 attention and adequate management.
Weight: 1

Score x Weight = 3x 1
Highest Score = 3

Result: 1

2. Modifiability of the Computation: Justification:

Problem High Score: 3

Actual Score: 1
Weight: 1
Score x Weight = 1 x 2
Highest Score = 3
Partially modifiable. There are self-
management behaviors, including medication
adherence, self-blood pressure monitoring and
lifestyle modifications involving diet and
exercise.

Result: 1
NAME PAST ILLNESS ILLNESS STATE

3. Preventive Potential Computation: Justification:

High Score: 3 Hypertension is frequently managed through eating

Actual Score: 2 properly, maintaining a healthy weight, and
Weight: 1 exercising regularly.

Score x Weight = 2 x 3
Highest Score = 1

Result: 0.67

4. Salience Computation: Justification:

High Score:2 The family views hypertension as a serious problem

Actual Score: 2 and it needs immediate action.
Weight: 1

Score x Weight = 2x 1
Highest Score = 2

Result: 1

TOTAL Nature of the Problem: 1

Modifiability of the Problem: 1
Preventive Potential: 0.67
Salience: 1

Result: 3.67
 SCORING
PROBLEM #3 : Diabetes as health deficit.

NAME PAST ILLNESS ILLNESS STATE

1. Nature of the Problem Computation: Justification:

High Score: 3 It is a health deficit that requires urgent and

Actual Score: 3 appropriate attention.
Weight: 1

Score x Weight = 3x 1
Highest Score = 3

Result: 1

2. Modifiability of the Computation: Justification:

Problem High Score: 2

Actual Score: 0
Diabetes cannot be cured but it can be reversed
through diet changes and weight loss.
Weight: 2 Interventions are not feasible.

Score x Weight = 0x 2
Highest Score = 2

Result: 0
NAME PAST ILLNESS ILLNESS STATE

3. Preventive Potential Computation: 3/3 x 1 Justification:

High Score: 3 This health deficit can be prevented and minimized if

Actual Score: 3 interventions are done properly.
Weight: 1 This chronic disease can be inherited but
environmental factors play a role.
Score x Weight = 3x 1
Highest Score = 3

Result: 1

4. Salience Computation: 2/2 x 1 Justification:

High Score:2 The family recognize diabetes as a serious problem,

Actual Score: 2 and it needs immediate action.
Weight: 1

Score x Weight = 2x 1
Highest Score = 2

Result: 1

TOTAL Nature of the Problem: 1

Modifiability of the Problem: 0
Preventive Potential:1
Salience: 1
Result: 3
 FAMILY
SERVICE AND
Initial data base (2)
PROGRESS
RECORD

HEAD OF THE FAMILY

Myrna G. Bagang
FAMILY NUMBER: 4
ADDRESS: 324 Purok 4
Lanang Candaba
Pampanga
FAMILY SERVICE AND FAMILY SERVICE AND
PROGRESS RECORD PROGRESS RECORD
II. Problem
Sheet
III.
Nursing
Care Plan
III.
Nursing
Care Plan
IV.
Service
and
Progress
Notes
 The list of
health problems
ranked
according to
priorities is
presented:
 INTERVIEW
DOCUMENTATION

INTERVIEWER : Jessie Rey Bagang

I N T E R V I E W E E : Myrna Bagang
 GROUP 1
Ivan Dan Allen
Kathleen Arceo
Lovely Sophia Arcibal

THANK YOU!
Jessie Rey Bagang
Aldrin Lumawig Berber
Kaizly Cabuso
Icha Casabar
Paolo Catama
Kristine Cruz
Sofia Bianca Dantes
Charles Rudy Dela Cruz