TEMPLATE FOR STATIC CHART

On the table and pie chart one sees tabulations of figures for Ashdown Museum’s
refurbishment over a period of one year. The upshot of the table is that visitor numbers
experienced a rising trend to 92,000, with figures for positive ratings going up, and the
numbers for negative ones falling off.
The numbers for positive feedback indicated that there were major gains during
the year. For very satisfied guests, there was evidence of totals shooting up, reaching
35% by one year. It was among satisfied guests that there occurred similar
developments, as these numbers jumped to 40%.
The situation with negative or neutral ratings was rather different due to the fact
that this type of feedback dropped off or held steady. It is clear that there were
substantial losses for dissatisfied and very dissatisfied museum goers through the year,
which reached a total of 15% and 5%. The trend changed for non-responses as a result of
flat figures at 5% at the end of the period, demonstrating no movement.

Displayed on the bar graph are data for buying tickets online, 2006. It is abundantly
evident that figures for Australia and the UK for likelihood generally outstripped those
for Malaysia, while greater totals of buying tickets online were seen in desktops and
laptops.
The two more prominent features for likelihood encompassed Australia and the UK and
had substantially higher totals of people 25-44 than Malaysia. Data for Australia and the
UK comprised notably more people aged 25-44 than 65 and over, with figures standing
at roughly 53% and 48% on average, respectively. The situation was rather different
when it came to Malaysia, which numbered 41% older people and 37% younger ones,
thereby creating the third-ranking overall totals.
The two higher profile sets of figures for means were for desktops and laptops and had
decisively larger totals compared to mobile phones. Turning to desktops and laptops,
one notices generally higher figures for Malaysia and Australia, with the numbers
totaling about 45% to 6

Displayed on the + O + are data for + O + prep. + (time)

It is abundantly evident that figures for + O + adv. + outstripped/fell below/paralleled +

those for + O, while greater/lower + totals + prep. + O + were seen in + O

Par II:

The + # + more/less prominent features + prep + O + encompassed + O + O + O + and

had+ adv. + higher/lower + totals of + O

Data for + O + comprised + adv. + more/fewer + S + than + S +, with figures standing at

+ # + and + # +, respectively

The situation was rather + different/similar + when it came to + O +, who/which +

numbered + # + and + #
Par III:

The + # + lower/higher + profile sets of figures + prep + O + were for + O + O + O + and

had + adv. + larger/smaller + totals of + O

Turning to + O +, one notices + adv. + higher/lower/equal + figures for + O + compared

with + O, with the numbers totaling + # + and + #

Matters took shape + somewhat differently/rather similarly + with respect to + O +, as

figures + prep. + O + were + higher/lower + than + O +, amounting to + # + and + #