Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/307466510
CITATIONS READS
4 354
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Serge R Guiot on 30 August 2016.
Biomethanation of synthesis gas using anaerobic granules within a closed loop gas
lift reactor
Abstract Gasification of biomass produces a mixture of gas (mainly carbon monoxide, CO2 and
hydrogen) called synthesis gas, or singes, by thermal degradation without combustion. Syngas can
be used for heat or electricity production by thermochemical processes. This project aims at
developing an alternative way to bio-upgrade syngas into biogas (mainly methane), via anaerobic
fermentation. A few strains of archaea are able of carboxydotrophic methanogenesis, some
potentially present in industrial wastewater-treating anaerobic granules. An industrial granular
sludge was first characterized for its carboxydotrophic methanogenesis potential using batch tests
under various conditions. Then those granules were inoculated into a 30 liters gas-lift reactor and
supplied with a gas mixture containing carbon monoxide, to study the production of methane and
others metabolites, at different gas feeding and recirculation rates. Carbon monoxide being a
poorly soluble gas, a challenge was to reach an adequate gas-to-liquid mass transfer, without
exceeding the toxicity level.
Keywords Anaerobic; syngas; carbon monoxide; carboxydotrophic; methane; gas lift; granules
INTRODUCTION
Several bioconversion routes exist to turn biomass into gas or liquid fuels. A significant
portion of biomass is however difficultly and/or slowly biodegradable by
microorganisms, due to its heterogeneous and polymeric nature. When the organic
residue is relatively dry (e.g. woodchips, bug wood …) or non-biodegradable (bark,
plastics, rubber ….), it might be more appropriate to use thermo-chemical conversion
techniques such as gasification. Gasification transforms biomass at high temperature
(500-1500°C) and pressure (1-80 bars) with limited amounts of water and oxygen into a
synthetic gas (syngas) mainly composed of carbon monoxide (CO), CO2 and hydrogen.
Minor syngas components include water vapor, methane, light hydrocarbons (C2H4,
C2H6), and some volatile impurities. Syngas can be used directly to power industrial
boilers, gas turbines or fuel cells to make electricity. Syngas can also be upgraded into
methane with chemical catalysts. This includes the water-gas shift reaction for increasing
the H2/CO and nickel-catalyzed methanation of CO and CO2 into methane and water
(Ridler and Twigg 1996). After separation, methane could be used locally for energy
To circumvent these disadvantages and use milder treatments with minimal chemical and
energy, we can harness the power of microorganisms to convert the syngas compounds
into biogas (biomethanation). A small number of microbes can reduce the CO from
syngas into methane (Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum, Methanothermobacter
wolfeii, Methanobrevibacter arboriphilicus, Methanocaldococcus jannaschii,
Methanopyrus kandleri, Methanosaeta thermophila, Methanosarcina acetivorans, M.
barkeri, …) (Daniels et al 1977, Hammel et al 1984, Mazumder et al 1985, Klasson et al
1990, Wasserfallen et al 2000, Rother and Metcalf 2004, Sokolova et al 2009). In short,
the syngas can be a substrate for those carboxydotrophic methanogenic archaea that grow
chemolithoautotrophically on CO and H2 (Henstra et al 2007). Two direct reactions are
possible: (I) 4 CO + 2 H2O → CH4 + 3 CO2 (∆G°' = –53 kJ/mol CO, but growth might
be slight); (II) CO + 3 H2 → CH4 + H2O (∆G°' = –150 kJ/mol CO, faster growth). In
theory, as long as H2 is not limiting, the second reaction, thermodynamically more
favorable, should prevail, and the first one should take over, once H 2 becomes deficient.
Indirect reactions are also possible, with a mixed anaerobic consortium. For instance:
carboxydotrophic hydrogenogenesis (enzymatic water-gas shift reaction (Svetlichnyi et al
1991), CO + H2O → H2 + CO2, ∆G°' = –20 kJ/mol CO) followed by either the
methanogenic reduction of CO2, or carboxydotrophic methanogenesis (in either case, net
result: 4 CO + 2 H2O → CH4 + 3 CO2); either CO-homoacetogenesis (2 CO + 2 H2 →
CH3COOH) or acetogenesis (4 CO + 2 H2O → CH3COOH + 2 CO2, ∆G°' = –44 kJ/mol
CO) followed by acetoclastic methanogenesis; or carboxydotrophic production of
methanol (CO + 2 H2 → CH3OH, ∆G°' = –39 kJ/mol CO) followed by methylotrophic
methanogenesis (CH3OH → ¾ CH4 + ¼ CO2 + ½ H2O); or oxidation of CO into formic
acid (CO + H2O → HCOOH), followed by its reduction into CH4. Furthermore,
Clostridia produce, beside acetate, significant amounts of ethanol, butyrate and butanol
that can then be converted into acetate, then methane. Whatever the set of reactions, the
final CH4 yield is identical, i.e. 0.25 mol CH4 per mol CO, plus 0.25 mol CH4 per mol H2.
This would result within a treatment chain made of gasification followed by
biomethanation of syngas, into a practical CH4 yield from biomass varying between 0.2
and 0.4 m3 STP CH4/kg VS gasified, depending on the syngas composition (i.e. CO
between 30 and 60 % (vol./vol.), H2 between 60 and 25%, and CO2 between 35 and 3%).
Reactor set-up
A closed-loop gas lift reactor (internal diameter 0.2 m; height 1.13 m; working liquid
volume 30 L; headspace 4 L) with an internal draft-tube of 0.6 m height and 0.1 m
diameter was used in this study. The reactor temperature was controlled by a probe (DP-
41, Omega Engineering Inc, Stamford, CT) placed just below the liquid upper level and
maintained at 35ºC by circulating water from a thermostatic bath (RK12418-30, Cole
Parmer, Niles, IL) through the reactor water jacket. The pH was measured (electrode 405-
DPAS-SC-K8S, Mettler Toledo GmbH, Urdorf, CH) and controlled between 6.9 and 7.8
using 0.1M NaOH or 0.1M HCl with a pH controller (PHP-194, Omega Engineering Inc,
Stamford, CT). The feeding gas whose CO (Praxair Canada Inc, Mississauga, ON, CA)
content was adjusted using nitrogen gas (Praxair Canada Inc) was bubbled at the center of
the reactor bottom. The gas flow rates were measured and controlled by thermal mass
flow meters (M100B, M10MB, 247D, MKS, Wilmington, MA). The gas exited the
reactor through a pressure valve (TM Swagelok, Solon, OH) to maintain the reactor
headspace at the desired pressure (manometer 0-60PSI, US Gauge, Ira Township, MI).
The gas phase was recycled with a compressor (UN036STI, Neuberger Inc, Trenton, NJ)
at a flow rate varying between 0.6 and 1.15 L/min. In the gas recycle, an empty column
was used as a condenser and foam trap. A secondary gas loop was equipped with a valve
set at about 4.3 atm in case of failure of the primary outlet and pressure buildup.
The reactor was inoculated with anaerobic granules from a full-scale UASB plant treating
fruit processing wastewater (Lassonde Inc., Rougemont, QC, Canada). The dilution water
(buffer, containing (mg/L): Na2HCO3, 2700; NaH2PO4, 1100; Ca(NO3)24H2O, 1442;
K2HPO4, 4000) was supplied (PHP-194, Omega Engineering Inc, Stamford, CT) at the
base of the reactor at an average flow rate of 0.2 L/d. The nutrient and trace metal
solutions were pumped (PHP-194, Omega Engineering Inc, Stamford, CT USA) into the
dilution water stream according to a volume ratio of 45/47/100 respectively. The nutrient
solution contained (mg/L): KH2PO4, 4040; K2HPO4, 5160; NH4HCO3, 19521. The trace
metal solution contained (mg/L): FeSO47H2O, 856; H3 BO3, 5; ZnSO47H2O, 13;
MnSO4H2O, 60; Co(NO3)26H2O, 33; CuSO4, 45; NiSO46H2O, 9; (NH4)6Mo7O244H2O,
273; AlK(SO4)212H2O, 2; Na2-EDTA, 33; MgSO47H2O 1630; Na2SeO4, 6;
Na2WO42H2O, 6.
Analytical methods
Chemical oxygen demand (COD), total and suspended solids (TS and SS) and total and
suspended volatile solid (VS and VSS) according to the standard methods (APHA et al
2005). Measurement of acetic, propionic and butyric acids was made on an Agilent 6890
gas chromatograph (Wilmington, DE) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) on
0.2 µl samples fortified 1:1 (vol./vol.) using an internal standard of iso-butyric acid in 6%
formic acid, directly injected on a glass column of 1 m × 2 mm Carbopack C (60-80
mesh) coated with 0.3 % Carbowax 20M and 0.1% H 3PO4. The column was held at 130
°C for 4 minutes and helium was the carrier gas at a rate of 20 mL/min. The injector and
the detector were both maintained at 200°C. For alcohols, 100 µl of liquid were
transferred in 20 ml headspace vial crimped with a Teflon coated septum. The vial was
heated at 800C for 2 min, then 1000 µl of headspace gas were injected on a DB-ACL2
J&W capillary column of 30 m x 530 mm x 2 µm (Agilent). The column was held at
400C for 10 min. Helium was the carrier gas at a head pressure of 5 psi. The injector and
the detector were maintained at 2000C and 2500C, respectively. The gas composition (O2,
H2, CH4, N2, CO, CO2) was measured by injecting 300 µL of gas (model 1750 gas-tight
syringe, Hamilton, Reno, NV) into a HP 6890 gas chromatograph (Hewlett Packard, Palo
Alto, CA) equipped with a TCD and a 5 m x 2,1 mm Carboxen-1000 column (Supelco,
Bellafonte, PA) with argon as carrier gas. The column temperature was held at 60ºC for
7 min and increased to 225ºC at a rate of 60ºC per min.
Reactor performance
The carboxydotrophic methanogenic potential of anaerobic granules were then tested in
the 30 L closed-loop gas-lift reactor continuously fed with a gas stream of N2-diluted CO.
Different experimental phases were carried out under various operational conditions as
shown in Table 2. Three days after the inoculation the CO loading was increased, then
kept relatively constant, at 0.35-0.41 LCO STP or 15-18 mmol/g VSS·d. Without gas
recirculation the insufficient gas holdup limited the mass transfer at 4%. At day 10, a low
gas recirculation was set on which increased the gaseous CO transfer efficiency to 51%.
At day 30, the gas recirculation-to-feeding ratio was augmented from 9:1 to 18:1. This
increased the gaseous CO transfer efficiency to 70%. Then at day 56 while the gas
recirculation ratio was returned back to 10:1, the CO partial pressure in the feeding
stream was augmented from 0.4 to 0.6 atm. This allowed for a relative conservation of
the CO transfer efficiency at 67%, while a combination of higher partial pressure and gas
Metabolites other than methane were observed, although in traces The concentrations
accumulated in the liquid are given in Table 2. Methanol was the main co-metabolite.
This was unexpected because its formation from CO depends on H 2 and is less exergonic
than for other soluble metabolites such as acetate or ethanol (Sipma et al 2006). However
as significant concentrations of methanol only occurred until day 30, it is presumed that it
is formed from residual intragranular organics introduced together with the inoculum,
namely pectins, since granules were originating from a fruit juice wastewater plant.
Actually Clostridia have been reported to produce methanol as a major end-product
during growth on pectin (Schink and Zeikus 1980).
Sensitivity to CO
The gas-to-liquid mass transfer might not be the only limitation of the process, namely
dissolved CO concentration might also not be optimal. To investigate that hypothesis, an
activity test-based kinetic study was performed, using the unadapted anaerobic sludge
(inoculum) diluted within anaerobic phosphate buffer under different initial partial
pressure of CO (pCO) varying from 0.09 to 0.9 atm corresponding to dissolved CO
concentrations from 0.08 to 0.74 mM. Carboxydotrophic specific activity results are
7
Specific activity (mmol/gVSd)
0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
CO concentration (mM)
CONCLUSIONS
Industrial anaerobic granule sludge clearly has a significant carboxydotrophic
methanogenesis potential, and does not require particular acclimation. Prospects may
include enrichment and thermophilic conditions, to increase specific bioactivity, as well
as adaptation to alleviate the methanogenic inhibitory impact of CO above 0.2 mM.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors wish to thank A. Corriveau, C. Beaulieu and S. Deschamps for analytical
assistance. The study was partially funded by the AAFC-NRCan-NRC National
Bioproducts Program.
REFERENCES
APHA, AWWA and WEF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater,
American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
Bredwell, M.D., Srivastava, P. and Worden, R.M. (1999) Reactor design issues for synthesis-gas
fermentations. Biotechnol. Prog. 15(5), 834-844.
Daniels, L., Fuchs, G., Thauer, R.K. and Zeikus, J.G. (1977) Carbon monoxide oxidation by methanogenic
bacteria. J. Bact. 132, 118-126.
Guiot, S.R., Safi, B., Frigon, J.-C., Mrcier, P., Mulligan, C., Tremblay, R. and Samson, R. (1995)
Performances of a full-scale novel multiplate anaerobic reactor treating cheese whey effluent. Biotech.
Bioeng. 45(5), 398-405.
Hammel, K.E., Cornwell, K.L., Diekert, G.B. and Thauer, R.K. (1984) Evidence for a nickel-containing
carbon monoxide dehydrogenase in Methanobrevibacter arboriphilicus. J. Bacteriol. 157(3), 975-978.
Henstra, A.M., Sipma, J., Rinzema, A. and Stams, A.J.M. (2007) Microbiology of synthesis gas
fermentation for biofuel production. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 18(3), 200-206.
Klasson, K.T., Cowger, J.P., Ko, C.W., Vega, J.L., Clausen, E.C. and Gaddy, J.L. (1990) Methane
production from synthesis gas using a mixed culture of R. rubrum, M. barkeri, and M. formicicum.
Appl. Biochem. Biotech. 24-25(1), 317-328.
Mazumder, T.K., Nishio, N. and Nagai, S. (1985) Carbon monoxide conversion to formate by
Methanosarcina barkeri. Biotechnol. Lett. 7(6), 377-382.
Ridler, D.R. and Twigg, M.V. (1996) Catalyst Handbook, Manson Publishing, London, UK.
Rother, M. and Metcalf, W.W. (2004) Anaerobic growth of Methanosarcina acetivorans C2A on carbon
monoxide: an unusual way of life for a methanogenic archaeon. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 101(48),
16929-16934.
Schink, B. and Zeikus, J.G. (1980) Microbial methanol formation: a major end product of pectin
metabolism. Curr. Microbiol. 4(6), 387-389.
Sipma, J., Henstra, A.M., Parshina, S.N., Lens, P.N.L., Lettinga, G. and Stams, A.J.M. (2006) Microbial
CO conversions with applications in synthesis gas purification and bio-desulfurization. Crit. rev.
biotech. 26(1), 41-65.
Sokolova, T.G., Henstra, A.-M., Sipma, J., Parshina, S.N., Stams, A.J.M. and Lebedinsky, A.V. (2009)
Diversity and ecophysiological features of thermophilic carboxydotrophic anaerobes. FEMS
Microbiol. Ecol. 68(2), 131-141.
Svetlichnyi, V.A., Sokolova, T.G., Gerhardt, M., Ringpfeil, M., Kostrikina, N.A. and Zavarzin, G.A.
(1991) Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans gen. nov., sp. nov., a CO-utilizing thermophilic
anaerobic bacterium from hydrothermal environments of Kunashir Island. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 14,
254-260.
Wasserfallen, A., Nölling, J., Pfister, J., Reeve, J. and Conway de Macario, E. (2000) Phylogenetic analysis
of 18 thermophilic Methanobacterium isolates supports the proposals to create a new genus,
Methanothermobacter gen. nov., and to reclassify several isolates in three species,
Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus comb. nov., Methanothermobacter wolfeii comb. nov., and
Methanothermobacter marburgensis sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evolut. Microbiol. 50, 43–53.
Wood, S.M. and Layzell, D.B. (2003) A Canadian Biomass Inventory: Feedstocks for a Bio-based
Economy, p. 42, BIOCAP Canada Foundation, Kingston, Ont.