Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOCTORAATPROGRAMMA
PARKSTRAAT 45 BUS 3600
3000 LEUVEN, BELGIË
< report of the main conclusions, comments and recommendations of the supervisory committee >
< report of the main conclusions, comments and recommendations of the supervisory committee >
< report of the main conclusions, comments and recommendations of the supervisory committee >
(4) Work Plan – progress in PhD trajectory (e.g. using a schematic overview), feasibility of
planned activities
< report of the main conclusions, comments and recommendations of the supervisory committee >
http://soc.kuleuven.be/fsw/phdschool
2
ONS KENMERK
UW KENMERK
ERROR:
BLZ.
REFERENCE
< report of the main conclusions, comments and recommendations of the supervisory committee >
../../….
DECISION:
(1) The supervisory committee approves the research proposal □ YES
□ CONDITIONAL YES
□ NO
(2) Does the supervisory committee has any ethical / moral □ YES
objections regarding the research project? □ CONDITIONAL YES
□ NO
ooOoo