You are on page 1of 4

_________________________________________________________________________________________

Arnold Schwarzenegger:
leader of California
_________________________________________________________________________________________

1. What words would you use to describe Arnold


Schwarzenegger’s personality? Do any of these fit into
the Big Five Personality Taxonomy? How might these
personality traits influence Schwarzenegger’s leadership
skills? How might these traits have helped
Schwarzenegger get to where he is now?
Answer:
Arnold Schwarzenegger has a well-rounded, strong and persistent personality, combined with
what appears as unique social and leadership skills. His past accomplishments and the way he
handled challenges in the public sphere fit very well into the Big Five Model of personality.

In his early career Schwarzenegger was a bodybuilder and an actor – two professions which
require a high level of extroversion and gregariousness. Indeed, he seems powerful but not
intimidating, social enough to offer himself as a leader in a trust relationship.

Standing behind his promises and sticking with his plans, Schwarzenegger appears to be a
conscientious, reliable and stabile person. He is attentive to others’ wishes, but seems to make
decisions according to his own judgement.

Schwarzenegger was able to transform these abilities and others to a successful political career.
He is friendly and open, but do not position himself as one who can be maneuvered or confirm
with the majority. Most significantly, California’s need for a strong leadership in the governor’s
office during a period of economic difficulties has helped Schwarzenegger in the race for the
chair.

This study source was downloaded by 100000839424203 from CourseHero.com on 01-23-2022 03:05:11 GMT -06:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/22404784/Arnold-Schwarzengegger-leader-of-California/
2. As governor of California, what types of power is
Schwarzenegger likely to have? What types of influence
tactics does Schwarzenegger appear to use?
Answer:
As a governor, Schwarzenegger has obviously the possibility to practice his formal power as the
base of influence. Considering his natural influence on people, it appears though that
Schwarzenegger is reluctant to use coercive or legitimacy sources of power, rather presenting
himself as a rewarding leader. One example is his effort to pass a budgeting reform: at what
seems as unusual for a governor, he left his office to hold discussion with the other officials on
their own desks; that is, in fact, a tendency not to frighten others, but to cooperate and
demonstrate attention to the perceived advantages of his plan.

A part of his personal power stems from his referent power, meaning that he does not pretend to
be an expert where he is not, but emphasizes that he can gain the required knowledge or skills or
to use others’ opinions.

3. How would you describe Schwarzenegger’s leadership


style using the leadership theories covered in this course?
What details of the case lead you to these conclusions? Is
Schwarzenegger’s leadership style likely to be effective?
Defend your position.
Answer:
The evidences provided in the text support some of Schwarzenegger’s leadership styles, mainly
from the authentic, charismatic and attribution theories of leadership.

Authentic leadership: since his childhood, Schwarzenegger had clear vision about where he
wanted to be and where not. This vision helped him to achieve many of his goals, including the
plans he presented to the citizens of California.

Charismatic Leadership: Schwarzenegger’s charisma is loud and clear, partially because people
tend to attribute to him superhuman powers (as in many of his films). A clear example is George
W. Bush 2004 re-election campaign, when the Republican Party, which hesitated regarding
Schwarzenegger’s involvement in the campaign, ultimately gave him the “prime-time” speech of
the Republican Convention. His behavior was easy to identify with and gave a material support
to the campaign.

Attribution leadership: many perceive the charismatic and well-networked governor as not as a
professional politician, but as a representative of individual interests. Hence, the attribution is not
merely on his leadership power but also on his ability to access legislative decision makers
through it. Nevertheless, he is at the same time direct, honest and has a lack of political
correctness, which also implies that he does not need distance mechanism which other politicians

This study source was downloaded by 100000839424203 from CourseHero.com on 01-23-2022 03:05:11 GMT -06:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/22404784/Arnold-Schwarzengegger-leader-of-California/
use to sweep the crowd. He has self-confidence instead of protective behavior and sticking to the
middle.

4. Applying concepts from goal-setting theory, explain


how goals have influenced Schwarzenegger’s progression
to the governor’s seat. What aspects of the case suggest
that Schwarzenegger is committed to the goals he has
set for himself?
Answer:
As mentioned earlier, Schwarzenegger has always set accurate goals that allow feedback and
made them public. The goals were challenging, but, nevertheless, attainable and from what
appear in the case, the main ones were ultimately achieved.

The same holds true for both his personal career goals and his agenda as a governor.
Schwarzenegger wanted to leave Austria and he did everything to accomplish this goal, even
though his parents did not support him. He was not afraid to change his life completely, when he
left his movie career and turned to politics. Schwarzenegger’s life and behavior is a good
example of a goal-setting theory according to which success can be achieved through clear goals’
setting and determination.

According to Edwin Locke, difficult goal increase performance, which is true also in the
Schwarzenegger’s case – his goals were by far above the average as well as his performance.

Schwarzenegger seem to have enough motivation to work toward accomplishing his goals, and
usually it is not an easy job. It would be fair to say, that everything Arnold achieved in his life, he
achieved through hard work and persistence – nothing came too easy for him.

5. Are there any ‘dark sides’ to Schwarzenegger’s


charisma and leadership skills? What might these be, and
how might they affect his relationships with others and
his ability to govern?
Answer:
Schwarzenegger has proved himself to be a charismatic leader, however, he is neither
experienced politician, nor economist. Basically, he does not have any financial or managerial

This study source was downloaded by 100000839424203 from CourseHero.com on 01-23-2022 03:05:11 GMT -06:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/22404784/Arnold-Schwarzengegger-leader-of-California/
background, that is considered as prerequisite for governor’s position. Lacking, economic and
political knowledge, Schwarzenegger is, nevertheless, very stubborn and sometimes even
arrogant. He is used to trust only his own opinion and does not always consider opinion of the
experts. Schwarzenegger is used to reach the goals he sets and he is not afraid to achieve them by
any means. For example, when the governor wanted to pass a $103 billion budget, he used all his
influence and charisma to achieve the goal and gain public support. The problem with such
attitude is that it can be quite dangerous when a person has influence and lack of knowledge. For
example, Schwarzenegger wants to tie teachers’ salaries to the test scores of the students, which
obviously shows his lack of experience and insight in education.

In addition to that, some people might see Schwarzenegger’s charisma as ability to manipulate
people.

6. How might Schwarzenegger’s personality and


leadership style help or hinder his ability to effectively
negotiate with other parties such as the teachers’ union?
Answer:
No need to repeat that Arnold is a very charismatic leader; he is also a good speaker able to express his
ideas eloquently and persuade people. He is able to set clear goals and explain his point of view. Arnold
is friendly enough and attentive to others when it is necessary which is definitely a good quality for the
negotiations. At the same time, California’s governor is very stubborn and arrogant, and not always ready
to listen to the opinion of the professionals. Most of the decision he makes according solely to his own
judgement. Moreover, there is a difference between negotiating and enforcing one’s personal opinion.
The fact that Schwarzenegger has no background and experience in education might undermine his
credibility in the eyes of the teachers’ union. However, the way Arnold consulted experts before the
elections seems like a very good practice and he will stick to it, it can significantly help his political career.

This study source was downloaded by 100000839424203 from CourseHero.com on 01-23-2022 03:05:11 GMT -06:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/22404784/Arnold-Schwarzengegger-leader-of-California/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

You might also like