Professional Documents
Culture Documents
⊥
Graduate School of Pure and Applied Science, University of Tsukuba, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba 305-0047, Japan
#
Downloaded via UNIV OF SOUTHERN INDIANA on July 22, 2019 at 02:53:39 (UTC).
National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology QST, 1233 Watanuki, Takasaki 370-1292, Japan
∇
Technological Institute for Superhard and Novel Carbon Materials, 7a Centralnaya Street, Troitsk, Moscow 108840, Russian
Federation
*
S Supporting Information
■ METHODS
Calculations of the atomic structure, stability, and spin-
dependent electronic properties were carried out using the
DFT + U method23 describing transition-metal compounds
within general gradient approximation24 and using the
augmented plane-wave method25 implemented in VASP
software.26−28 First, we defined the parameters U−J for the
correct description of electronic properties, in particular, the
value of the band gap of bulk (three-dimensional) CuO by
taking into account the intra-atomic Coulombic and exchange
interactions. The U−J parameter was found to be 8.5 eV to Figure 1. Energy difference between predicted 2D CuO structures
obtain the band gap of about 1.5 eV.14 Due to the large size of and corresponding bulk antiferromagnetic counterpart. Yellow, blue,
the considered supercells (more than 250 atoms), the energy and red bars correspond to antiferromagnetic, ferromagnetic, and
cutoff was set at 250 eV. Atomic structure relaxation was nonmagnetic states of 2D CuO, respectively. The corresponding
atomic structures with an energetically favorable spin configuration
carried out until the interatomic forces became less than 0.001
are presented. Cu and O atoms are shown in brown and red colors,
eV/Å. To avoid spurious interactions caused by periodic respectively.
images of the considered supercells, the lattice vector in the
nonperiodic direction was set at ∼15 Å. Behaviors of Cu and
CuO clusters in BG nanopores under constant temperature parameters of the predicted structure with a rectangular lattice
were described by means of the molecular dynamics (MD) are a = 5.468 Å and b = 5.457 Å. The CuO structure
method using the Nosé−Hoover thermostat.29,30 The total containing 8-membered rings is less energetically favorable and
simulation time varied from 0.15 to 0.35 ns with the time step may be considered as a defective orthorhombic CuO observed
of 0.1 fs. The simulation of the formation of the CuO layer experimentally.1 The graphene-like structure with a hexagonal
between the two edges of BG was carried out using the first- symmetry (h-CuO) has a higher energy, and the sublattice
principles fixed-composition evolutionary algorithm as imple- atoms in the unit cell tend to leave the plane, forming a
mented in the USPEX code adapted for the surfaces.31−34 silicene-like corrugated structure. It is worth noting that h-
Search for the stable crystal structure of a free-standing two- CuO is energetically unfavorable without the corrugation even
dimensional CuO monolayer was performed using the USPEX compared to the latter structure. The atomic structure with the
code as well. In both cases, the evolutionary searches were highest energy among considered ones belongs to the
combined with structure relaxations using density functional orthorhombic CuO containing Cu−O−Cu chains with a
theory (DFT)35,36 also within the generalized gradient ferromagnetic order different from the other predicted CuO
approximation24 (spin-polarized generalized gradient approx- structures.
imation in the case of free-standing CuO) and the projector We used a partially bilayered graphene common to both the
augmented plane-wave method 25 implemented in the experiments in ref 1 and this report. The graphene sheet was
VASP26−28 package. The plane-wave energy cutoff of 500 eV synthesized by chemical vapor deposition under the condition
and the k-mesh of 0.05 × 2π/Å−1 resolution ensure an determined from ref 40 to make AB-stacked BG. The number
excellent convergence of total energies. For the isolated slabs, of layers of graphene in each area was confirmed by dark-field
the monopole, dipole, and quadrupole corrections were taken transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution
into account using a method discussed in refs 37 and 38. TEM techniques (see pp 29−32 in ref 41). In ref 1, we
During the structure search, the first generation (80 structures confirmed the structure and composition of a 2D CuO
for prediction of the interface and 120 structures for the monolayer at the atomic level by annular dark-field scanning
isolated monolayer) was produced randomly; the successive TEM (ADF-STEM) combined with electron energy-loss
generations were obtained by applying 40% heredity, 10% soft spectroscopy (EELS). We used TEM-EELS for this report
mutation, 20% transmutation operations and 30% of the instead, and the result suggested that the sample was
generation was produced using symmetry random generators. composed of C, Cu, and O, although the TEM-EELS spectra
Each of the considered supercells contained a vacuum layer of are not only from 2D CuO in graphene but also from a wide
20 Å. area of the sample.
The unusual two-dimensional nature of CuO is different Figure 2a shows the experimentally observed TEM image of
from its bulk counterpart,14 requiring detailed investigation of 2D CuO in a graphene pore. Figure 2b−d shows the selected
its atomic structure. We performed an evolutionary search for a magnified and filtered TEM images obtained from the same
stable free-standing CuO monolayer using the USPEX area in a TEM movie. Before taking the movie, we irradiated a
code.31,32,39 The predicted lowest-energy structures were strong electron beam in a wide area to make a pore (BGP) in a
then relaxed with ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic spin bilayered graphene area. The microscope was operated at 80
ordering to define the favorable magnetic state. In Figure 1, the kV at room temperature. Graphene is much stable when
atomic structures of several predicted CuO monolayers are heated at around 500 °C, while it can be easily etched away at
shown. It was found that all predicted monolayers are magnetic room temperature under electron beam irradiation because of
with preliminary antiferromagnetic spin ordering, except for oxygen-based contaminants remaining on the graphene
the fourth predicted structure with ferromagnetic ordering surface.42 The TEM movie was then acquired at a speed of
(Figure 1). The experimentally observed1 CuO layer with a 1 frame/s. The area of bilayered graphene was partially etched
rectangular lattice displays the lowest energy. The lattice away, and the 2D CuO surrounded by not only BG but also
17460 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05353
J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 17459−17465
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
Figure 4. Schematic representation of 2D CuO with denotations of the edges. (b) Atomic structures and the corresponding names of four
considered CuO/BG interfaces.
orientation between graphene and the CuO monolayer, several We studied how the CuO/BG interface can influence the
possible types of interfaces can be considered: ZZ−LN, ZZ− spin-dependent electronic properties of the 2D CuO. The
ZZ, AC−LN, and AC−ZZ (the first and second parts label the calculations were performed for the most stable CuO/BG
type of the BG and CuO edge, respectively) (Figure 4b). interfaces (ZZ−ZZ and AC−ZZ) as shown in Figure 5. A
The binding energy of the interface was calculated using the detailed analysis through the comparison between the spin-
equation resolved densities of states (DOS) of the CuO/BG interface
ECuO/BG − E BG − ECuO and of its individual components (Sections (i)−(iv) in Figure
Eb = 5) reveals that the formation of the CuO/BG interfaces
2L (1) changes the electronic properties of BG significantly. Visual-
where ECuO/BG, EBG, and ECuO are the total energy of the ization of the electron density distribution (top panels of
interface and the individual components (BG and CuO) and L Figure 5) suggests that in both the energetically preferable
is the length of the interface within the unit cell, which was interfaces (ZZ−ZZ and AC−ZZ), the electron density in CuO
multiplied by 2 due to the presence of the two interfaces in the is mostly redistributed at the region close to the interface. The
considered CuO/BG supercell (Figure 4b). The calculated individual BG component displays a DOS that is symmetric
values of the binding energies are presented in Table 1. with respect to the majority and minority spin states (Figure 5,
Section (i)), while the connection with the CuO component
Table 1. Calculated Values of Binding Energies of CuO/BG (Figure 5, Section (ii)) leads to the appearance of spin density
Interfaces on the interface carbon and copper atoms. Spin polarization
(SP) of the interface atoms derived from the interfacial DOS
interface configuration ZZ−LN AC−LN ZZ−ZZ AC−ZZ (Figure 5, Sections (iii)−(iv)) varies depending on the type of
binding energy (eV/Å) 1.04 −0.078 −2.63 −0.52 the CuO/BG interface. It was found that the ZZ−ZZ interface
displays a small SP in carbon and copper atoms at the Fermi
energy (about 1%, see Sections (v) and (vi) in Figure 5a),
Termination of the bilayered graphene edges by chemically while the less energetically preferable AC−ZZ interface
active copper atoms leads to the energy preference of the displays a higher SP value (about 4 and 8%) at the Fermi
interfaces with the AC−ZZ and ZZ−ZZ configurations; energy for carbon and copper atoms, respectively (Sections (v)
however, the relative stability of the considered interfaces and (vi) in Figure 5b). On the other hand, the interface effect
mainly comes from their geometry. The most energetically on the spin properties of the CuO region has the opposite
favorable ZZ−ZZ interface (−2.63 eV/Å) represents the character. The isolated 2D CuO region displays a pronounced
almost perfect connection of two undistorted layers of BG and spin asymmetry originating from the presence of the
CuO by Cu termination. The Cu atoms on the edges make a chemically active edges terminated by Cu (see Figure 5,
strong connection with the ZZ edge of BG due to the small Section (ii)). After the formation of the CuO/BG interfaces,
lattice mismatch (less than 1%) between the corresponding the spin asymmetry on copper atoms drastically decreases
CuO and the graphene superlattices. In the case of the AC−ZZ through the spin redistribution between CuO and the edges of
interface, the presence of a Cu termination also leads to the BG (see Figure 5, Section (iv)). The similar effect was
formation of a low-energy interface between CuO and the AC observed in both interfaces considered. The above results allow
edges of BG. However, the presence of the mixed edges (ZZ− us to discuss the prospects of forming the interfaces of this
LN and AC−LN) in BGP does not allow the formation of a kind for potential use in spintronics.
smooth interface between the bilayered graphene edge and The formation process of the CuO monolayer in BGP was
CuO like in the case of the AC−ZZ interface. Cu and O atoms investigated in a step-by-step manner using the evolutionary
on the edge tend to move in the bridge position between two algorithm USPEX.31−34 The supercell comprising two
graphene layers, which causes a local corrugation of the CuO bilayered graphene edges containing 64 carbon atoms was
lattice near the interface (see Figure 4b). Copper and oxygen used as a substrate. Structural evolution in the region between
atoms move out from the plane of the CuO monolayer toward BG edges was observed by depositing a certain amount of Cu
different graphene layers. In both the ZZ and AC edges of BG, and O atoms on the substrate. The simulations were
oxygen atoms prevent the formation of the C−C bonds performed under three different conditions of the Cu:O ratios
between two graphene layers in the bilayered edge, which leads of 10:8, 12:12 and 14:12. The obtained results are shown in
to the increase of the whole interface energy. Figure 6a−c for Cu:O = 10:8 (a), 12:12 (b) and 14:12 (c).
17462 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05353
J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 17459−17465
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
Figure 5. Electron density distribution after the formation of ZZ−ZZ (a) and AC−ZZ (b) interfaces. DOS of individual BG and CuO edges
partially resolved for C (i) and Cu (ii) atoms, respectively. DOS of the CuO/BG interface partially resolved for C (iii) and Cu (iv) atoms. Energy
dependence of spin polarization of C (v) and Cu (vi) atoms on the CuO/BG interface. The majority and minority spin states are shown as red and
blue lines, respectively.
Figure 6. Atomic structure of the CuO monolayer formed between the bilayered graphene edges predicted by evolutionary algorithm USPEX. The
Cu:O ratio was chosen as (a) 10:8, (b) 12:12 and (c) 14:12 to consider the structural evolution depending on the deposited amounts of copper
and oxygen atoms. Carbon atoms are shown in brown color, copper atoms in blue, and oxygen atoms in red.
During the evolutionary search in the first generation, the Cu blue) as a dominant structural motif (Figure 6c). Due to the
and O atoms were deposited randomly between the edges of lattice mismatch between BG and the orthorhombic CuO
the BG components. The evolution algorithm was used to monolayer, the formation of a uniform interface is not possible
perform a global optimization to find a stable structure of the and the O−O bond with the length of 1.49 Å is formed as seen
CuO/BG interface. The distance between the graphene edges, in Figure 6b,c. The distance between the neighboring Cu
which is equivalent to the pore size, was chosen to be 11.5 Å. atoms at the boundary of the two CuO monolayers is ∼2.3 Å.
The result of the simulations with deficiency of O atoms Such an interface contains equal amounts of O−O and Cu−Cu
(Cu:O = 10:8) is shown in Figure 6a. A small amount of Cu bonds along the boundary. The obtained results claim the
and O atoms initiates the early step of the interface growing possibility of the formation of an atomically thick rectangular
process, which begins at the bilayered graphene edges and then CuO monolayer as well as the possible appearance of a mirror
two Cu−O parts move toward each other (Figure 6a). symmetry one-dimensional topological defect therein.
Increasing the number of deposited atoms (Cu:O = 12:12) In the present work, the atomic structure and electronic
leads to the connection of the two Cu−O parts on each of the properties of a novel CuO monolayer were investigated in both
bilayered graphene edges (Figure 6b). Further increase of the theoretical and experimental ways. The systematic study of
number of deposited atoms (Cu:O = 14:12) induces the atomic geometry unambiguously revealed that the 2D CuO in
interface formation with Cu2O2 square units (highlighted by the ground state displays a rectangular atomic structure and
17463 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05353
J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 17459−17465
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C Article
■
*
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S Supporting Information
(6) Ma, R.; Sasaki, T. Nanosheets of Oxides and Hydroxides:
Ultimate 2D Charge-Bearing Functional Crystallites. Adv. Mater.
2010, 22, 5082−5104.
(7) Sasaki, T.; Watanabe, M.; Hashizume, H.; Yamada, H.;
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the Nakazawa, H. Macromolecule-like Aspects for a Colloidal Suspension
ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b05353. of an Exfoliated Titanate. Pairwise Association of Nanosheets and
TEM images of CuO and graphene; simulation of Dynamic Reassembling Process Initiated from It. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
atomic structure of the pure Cu monolayer; and results 1996, 118, 8329−8335.
of geometry relaxation of the CuO monolayer (PDF) (8) Kim, D. S.; Ozawa, T. C.; Fukuda, K.; Ohshima, S.; Nakai, I.;
■
Sasaki, T. Soft-Chemical Exfoliation of Na0.9Mo2O4: Preparation and
Electrical Conductivity Characterization of a Molybdenum Oxide
AUTHOR INFORMATION Nanosheet. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 2700−2702.
Corresponding Authors (9) Zhao, J.; Deng, Q.; Bachmatiuk, A.; Sandeep, G.; Popov, A.;
*E-mail: dgkvashnin@misis.ru (D.G.K.). Eckert, J.; Rümmeli, M. H. Free-Standing Single-Atom-Thick Iron
Membranes Suspended in Graphene Pores. Science 2014, 343, 1228−
*E-mail: e.kano0727@gmail.com (E.K.). 1232.
ORCID (10) Quang, H. T.; Bachmatiuk, A.; Dianat, A.; Ortmann, F.; Zhao,
D. G. Kvashnin: 0000-0003-3320-6657 J.; Warner, J. H.; Eckert, J.; Cunniberti, G.; Rümmeli, M. H. In Situ
A. G. Kvashnin: 0000-0002-0718-6691 Observations of Free-Standing Graphene-like Mono- and Bilayer ZnO
Membranes. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 11408−11413.
S. Sakai: 0000-0002-0367-9106 (11) Ruiz, E.; Alvarez, S.; Alemany, P.; Evarestov, R. A. Electronic
Notes Structure and Properties of Cu2O. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 56, 7189−7196.
The authors declare no competing financial interest. (12) Kastner, M. A.; Birgeneau, R. J.; Shirane, G.; Endoh, Y.
■ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge Dr. Shiro Entani (QST), Dr.
Magnetic, Transport, and Optical Properties of Monolayer Copper
Oxides. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1998, 70, 897−928.
(13) Ghijsen, J.; Tjeng, L. H.; van Elp, J.; Eskes, H.; Westerink, J.;
Sawatzky, G. A.; Czyzyk, M. T. Electronic Structure of Cu2O and
Songtian Li (QST), and the members of QST for fruitful CuO. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 38, 11322−11330.
discussion. TEM observation was supported by the “Nano- (14) Heinemann, M.; Eifert, B.; Heiliger, C. Band Structure and
technology Platform project” sponsored by MEXT, Japan. This Phase Stability of the Copper Oxides Cu2O, CuO, and Cu4O3. Phys.
work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI, Japan Rev. B 2013, 87, No. 115111.
(Grant No. 15J04118 for E.K., 25390035 for A.H., and (15) Reitz, J. B.; Solomon, E. I. Propylene Oxidation on Copper
16H03875 for S.S). A.H. acknowledges the Global Research Oxide Surfaces: Electronic and Geometric Contributions to Reactivity
Center for Environment and Energy based on Nanomaterials and Selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11467−11478.
Science, MEXT, Japan. S.S. acknowledges the QST Advanced (16) Nakaoka, K.; Ueyama, J.; Ogura, K. Photoelectrochemical
Behavior of Electrodeposited CuO and Cu2O Thin Films on
Study Laboratory (Res. Gr. For Advanced Quantum Func- Conducting Substrates. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, C661−C665.
tional Materials). The features of stability and atomic (17) Kim, S. Y.; Ahn, C. H.; Lee, J. H.; Kwon, Y. H.; Hwang, S.; Lee,
structures 2D Cu and CuO layer was supported by the J. Y.; Cho, H. K. p-Channel Oxide Thin Film Transistors Using
Russian Science Foundation (Project identifier: 17-72-20223). Solution-Processed Copper Oxide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013,
The analysis of bilayered graphene atomic structure was 5, 2417−2421.
supported by RFBR 17-02-01095. The study of interface (18) Zan, R.; Ramasse, Q. M.; Bangert, U.; Novoselov, K. S.
effects was supported by Increase Competitiveness Program of Graphene Reknits Its Holes. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3936−3940.
NUST “MISiS” No. K2-2019-016 and Grant of President of (19) Zhan, D.; Liu, L.; Xu, Y. N.; Ni, Z. H.; Yan, J. X.; Zhao, C.;
Russian Federation for government support of young DSc. Shen, Z. X. Low Temperature Edge Dynamics of AB-Stacked Bilayer
(MD-1046.2019.2). We are grateful to the supercomputer Graphene: Naturally Favored Closed Zigzag Edges. Sci. Rep. 2011, 1,
No. 12.
cluster provided by the Materials Modelling and Development (20) He, K.; Robertson, A. W.; Gong, C.; Allen, C. S.; Xu, Q.;
Laboratory at NUST “MISIS” (supported via the grant from Zandbergen, H.; Grossman, J. C.; Kirkland, A. I.; Warner, J. H.
the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Controlled Formation of Closed-Edge Nanopores in Graphene.
Federation No. 14.Y26.31.0005), and to the Joint Super- Nanoscale 2015, 7, 11602−11610.
computer Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the (21) Nebogatikova, N. A.; Antonova, I. V.; Erohin, S. V.; Kvashnin,
Arkuda supercomputer of Skolkovo Foundation. D. G.; Olejniczak, A.; Volodin, V. A.; Skuratov, A. V.; Krasheninnikov,
A. V.; Sorokin, P. B.; Chernozatonskii, L. A. Nanostructuring Few- (44) Shao, Y.; Pang, R.; Shi, X. Stability of Two-Dimensional Iron
Layer Graphene Films with Swift Heavy Ions for Electronic Carbides Suspended across Graphene Pores: First-Principles Particle
Application: Tuning of Electronic and Transport Properties. Nano- Swarm Optimization. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 22954−22960.
scale 2018, 10, 14499−14509. (45) Chernozatonskiĭ, L. A.; Sorokin, P. B.; Fedorov, A. S. Energy
(22) Kvashnin, D. G.; Vancsó, P.; Antipina, L. Y.; Márk, G. I.; Biró, and Electronic Properties of Non-Carbon Nanotubes Based on
L. P.; Sorokin, P. B.; Chernozatonskii, L. A. Bilayered Semiconductor Silicon Dioxide. Phys. Solid State 2006, 48, 2021−2027.
Graphene Nanostructures with Periodically Arranged Hexagonal
Holes. Nano Res. 2015, 8, 1250−1258.
(23) Dudarev, S. L.; Botton, G. A.; Savrasov, S. Y.; Humphreys, C. J.;
Sutton, A. P. Electron-Energy-Loss Spectra and the Structural Stability
of Nickel Oxide: An LSDA+U Study. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 57, 1505−
1509.
(24) Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient
Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865−3868.
(25) Blöchl, P. E. Projector Augmented-Wave Method. Phys. Rev. B
1994, 50, 17953−17979.
(26) Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics for Liquid
Metals. Phys. Rev. B 1993, 47, 558−561.
(27) Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Ab Initio Molecular-Dynamics Simulation
of the Liquid-Metal-Amorphous-Semiconductor Transition in Ger-
manium. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49, 14251−14269.
(28) Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient Iterative Schemes for Ab
Initio Total-Energy Calculations Using a Plane-Wave Basis Set. Phys.
Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169−11186.
(29) Nosé, S. A Unified Formulation of the Constant Temperature
Molecular Dynamics Methods. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 511−519.
(30) Hoover, W. G. Canonical Dynamics: Equilibrium Phase-Space
Distributions. Phys. Rev. A 1985, 31, 1695−1697.
(31) Oganov, A. R.; Glass, C. W. Crystal Structure Prediction Using
Ab Initio Evolutionary Techniques: Principles and Applications. J.
Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, No. 244704.
(32) Oganov, A. R.; Lyakhov, A. O.; Valle, M. How Evolutionary
Crystal Structure Prediction Worksand Why. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011,
44, 227−237.
(33) Lyakhov, A. O.; Oganov, A. R.; Stokes, H. T.; Zhu, Q. New
Developments in Evolutionary Structure Prediction Algorithm
USPEX. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2013, 184, 1172−1182.
(34) Zhu, Q.; Li, L.; Oganov, A. R.; Allen, P. B. Evolutionary
Method for Predicting Surface Reconstructions with Variable
Stoichiometry. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, No. 195317.
(35) Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous Electron Gas. Phys
Rev 1964, 136, B864−B871.
(36) Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J. Self-Consistent Equations Including
Exchange and Correlation Effects. Phys Rev 1965, 140, A1133−
A1138.
(37) Makov, G.; Payne, M. C. Periodic Boundary Conditions in Ab
Initio Calculations. Phys. Rev. B 1995, 51, 4014−4022.
(38) Neugebauer, J.; Scheffler, M. Adsorbate-Substrate and
Adsorbate-Adsorbate Interactions of Na and K Adlayers on
Al(111). Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 16067−16080.
(39) Oganov, A. R.; Ma, Y.; Lyakhov, A. O.; Valle, M.; Gatti, C.
Evolutionary Crystal Structure Prediction as a Method for the
Discovery of Minerals and Materials. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2010,
271−298.
(40) Liu, L.; Zhou, H.; Cheng, R.; Yu, W. J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Shaw,
J.; Zhong, X.; Huang, Y.; Duan, X. High-Yield Chemical Vapor
Deposition Growth of High-Quality Large-Area AB-Stacked Bilayer
Graphene. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8241−8249.
(41) Kano, E. In Situ TEM Observation of Metal-Graphene
Interaction. Ph.D thesis, University of Tsukuba: Tsukuba, 2017.
(42) He, K.; Robertson, A. W.; Fan, Y.; Allen, C. S.; Lin, Y.-C.;
Suenaga, K.; Kirkland, A. I.; Warner, J. H. Temperature Dependence
of the Reconstruction of Zigzag Edges in Graphene. ACS Nano 2015,
9, 4786−4795.
(43) Kano, E.; Hashimoto, A.; Takeguchi, M. Opposite Effects of Cu
and Pt Atoms on Graphene Edges. Appl. Phys. Express 2017, 10,
No. 025104.