Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 02qcase Study Case Presentation T4 T5 Sesi 1 2021

    Uploaded by

    Luqman Murad
    40 views7 pages
    This document contains instructions for a group assignment on professional ethics. It includes two case studies and requires students to answer questions about each case. For case 1, students must identify who took greater risk in a situation involving a whistleblower. They must also discuss the relative ethics of behaviors at two companies and whether the whistleblowers regret their decisions. Case 2 involves a corruption scandal at FIFA. Students must identify impacted stakeholders, discuss corporate governance failures, and steps a new president could take to restore governance. They also analyze the value of outside directors. Finally, students must present findings from both cases and relate them to concepts of whistleblowing and corporate governance. They are instructed to be creative and discuss their

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    02QCASE STUDY CASE PRESENTATION T4 T5 SESI 1 2021

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains instructions for a group assignment on professional ethics. It includes two case studies and requires students to answer questions about each case. For case 1, students must identify who took greater risk in a situation involving a whistleblower. They must also discuss the relative ethics of behaviors at two companies and whether the whistleblowers regret their decisions. Case 2 involves a corruption scandal at FIFA. Students must identify impacted stakeholders, discuss corporate governance failures, and steps a new president could take to restore governance. They also analyze the value of outside directors. Finally, students must present findings from both cases and relate them to concepts of whistleblowing and corporate governance. They are instructed to be creative and discuss their

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    40 views7 pages

    02qcase Study Case Presentation T4 T5 Sesi 1 2021

    Uploaded by

    Luqman Murad
    This document contains instructions for a group assignment on professional ethics. It includes two case studies and requires students to answer questions about each case. For case 1, students must identify who took greater risk in a situation involving a whistleblower. They must also discuss the relative ethics of behaviors at two companies and whether the whistleblowers regret their decisions. Case 2 involves a corruption scandal at FIFA. Students must identify impacted stakeholders, discuss corporate governance failures, and steps a new president could take to restore governance. They also analyze the value of outside directors. Finally, students must present findings from both cases and relate them to concepts of whistleblowing and corporate governance. They are instructed to be creative and discuss their

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 7

    CASE STUDY AND CASE PRESENTATION

    SULIT DPA50173: PROFESSIONAL ETHICS

    DATE SUBMISSION: 30 December 2021


    GROUP ASSIGNMENT

    RUBRIC: 100 MARKS

    INSTRUCTION:
    This section consists of TWO (2) case base questions. Answer ALL questions.

    CASE 1 [TOPIC 4]

    2 SULIT
    SULIT DPA50173: PROFESSIONAL ETHICS

    DATE SUBMISSION: 30 December 2021


    GROUP ASSIGNMENT

    Required:

    CLO 3 (a) Identify who took the greater risk: Khaled Assadi or Kyle Lagow of the above
    A1 case.

    CLO 3 (b) Discuss your reason by refer to (a).


    A2
    (c) Discuss whether the alleged behaviour of GE Energy unethical than the
    behaviour of the Countrywide Financial.

    CLO 3 (d) Explain the opinion whether Assadi and Lagow regret their decisions to go to
    A4 the public with their information.

    CLO 3 (e) In your opinion, you may conclude whether their behavior could change
    A5 anything at the either company.

    3 SULIT
    SULIT DPA50173: PROFESSIONAL ETHICS

    DATE SUBMISSION: 30 December 2021


    GROUP ASSIGNMENT

    CASE 2 [TOPIC5]

    4 SULIT
    SULIT DPA50173: PROFESSIONAL ETHICS

    DATE SUBMISSION: 30 December 2021


    GROUP ASSIGNMENT

    5 SULIT
    SULIT DPA50173: PROFESSIONAL ETHICS

    DATE SUBMISSION: 30 December 2021


    GROUP ASSIGNMENT

    Required:

    CLO 3 (a) Identify which stakeholders were impacted by Blatter’s leadership at FIFA
    A1 of the above case.

    CLO 3 (b) Discuss the failures identified in corporate governance in the above case.
    A2
    (c) Report any evidence of good corporate governance in the above case.

    CLO 3 (d) Explain the steps should be taken by the new president of FIFA to restore
    A4 the corporate governance.

    CLO 3 (e) In your opinion, review the value added of the outside directors in the
    A5 board of the corporation.

    6 SULIT
    SULIT DPA50173: PROFESSIONAL ETHICS

    DATE SUBMISSION: 30 December 2021


    GROUP ASSIGNMENT

    CASE PRESENTATION:

    Required:
    CLO 3 (a) Describe the above findings from both cases in the presentation format.
    A1

    CLO 3 (b) Discuss the findings from the above cases.


    A2
    (c) Present the findings from the above cases.
    CLO 3
    A3 (d) Organise the findings in the creative presentation.

    CLO 3 (e) Relate the above findings with the concept of whistle blower and corporate
    A4 governance.

    END OF QUESTIONS

    7 SULIT
    SULIT DPA50173: PROFESSIONAL ETHICS

    DATE SUBMISSION: 30 December 2021


    GROUP ASSIGNMENT

    8 SULIT

    You might also like