Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reasoning Inequalities
Reasoning Inequalities
5. Statements: Y ≤ D < N, N ≥ W
Conclusions: D > W, Y≤W
A. Only conclusion I follows. B. Only conclusion II follows.
C. Both conclusions I and II follow. D. Either conclusion I or conclusion II follows.
E. Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.
6. Statements: J > U, L≥Z=R<U
Conclusions: I. L = R, II. J > R
A. Only conclusion I follows. B. Only conclusion II follows.
C. Both conclusions I and II follow. D. Either conclusion I or conclusion II follows.
E. Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
24. Statements: S < T<K, L < T≤ C, K=Y>G
Conclusions: I. S > Y II. K = C III. G<T
A. Only conclusion I follows B. Only conclusions II and III follow C. Only conclusion III follows
D. All the conclusions follow E. None of the conclusions follows
41. Statements: a ≥ b = c, b = d ≤ e
Conclusions: I. a = e II. c = d
A. Neither C1 nor C2 follows B. Only C1 follows C. Both C1 and C2 follow
D. Only C2 follows E. Either C1 or C2 follows
48. Which of the following conclusions does not follow the given statement - L > M < O ≤ R
=P≥Q?
A. P ≥ O B. Q < O C. M < R D. Q ≤ R E. P > M
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
ददशा-ननदे श: इस प्रश्न में , ददए गए कथन में विभिन्न तत्िों के बीच सम्बन्ध दशााया गया है | आऩको ददए गए
कथनों को सत्य मानना है यद्यवऩ िे िास्तविक ज्ञात तथ्यों से भिन्न हो | कथन के बाद कुछ ननष्कर्ा ददए
गए हैं | ददए गये कथन के आधार ऩर ननष्कर्ा ऩढ़कर उचचत उत्तर का चन
ु ाि करे |
5. कथन: Y ≤ D <N, N ≤ W
ननष्कर्ष: I. D> W, II. Y ≤ W
A. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष I अनस
ु रण करता है । B. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष II अनस
ु रण करता है ।
C. दोनों ननष्कर्ष I और II अनस
ु रण करते हैं। D. या तो ननष्कर्ष I या ननष्कर्ष II अनस
ु रण करता है ।
E. न तो ननष्कर्ष I और न ही ननष्कर्ष। II अनुसरण करता है ।
6. कथन: J > U, L = Z = R < U
ननष्कर्ष: I. L = R, II. J > R
A. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष I अनस
ु रण करता है । B. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष II अनस
ु रण करता है ।
C. दोनों ननष्कर्ष I और II अनस
ु रण करते हैं। D. या तो ननष्कर्ष I या ननष्कर्ष II अनस
ु रण करता है ।
E. न तो ननष्कर्ष I और न ही ननष्कर्ष। II अनुसरण करता है ।
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
11. कथन: D = L < A ≤ U ≤ S , F > R ≥ U = E ≥ A
ननष्कर्ष: E > L , F > D
A. दोनों ननष्कर्ष I और II अनस
ु रण करते हैं B. या तो ननष्कर्ष I या II अनस
ु रण करता है
C. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष I अनस
ु रण करता है D. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष II अनस
ु रण करता है
E. ना तो ननष्कर्ष I ना ही II अनुसरण करता है
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
16. कथन: S > J = B < E; M > D = U; E > W > U
ननष्कर्ष: E > D, B > M
A. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष II अनस
ु रण करता है B. दोनों ननष्कर्ष I और II अनस
ु रण करते है
C. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष I अनस
ु रण करता है D. ना तो ननष्कर्ष I ना ननष्कर्ष II अनस
ु रण करता है
E. या तो ननष्कर्ष I या ननष्कर्ष II अनुसरण करता है
17. कथन: A = X ≥ L; E ≤ J ≤ F; L ≥ Z = E
ननष्कर्ष: A < Z, Z > F
A. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष I अनुसरण करता है B. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष II अनुसरण करता है
C. दोनों ननष्कर्ष I और II अनुसरण करते है D. या तो ननष्कर्ष I या ननष्कर्ष II अनुसरण करता है
E. ना तो ननष्कर्ष I ना ननष्कर्ष II अनुसरण करता है
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
21. कथन: L = P ≤ M: V Q A, Q N R = N> P
ननष्कर्ष: I. Q > L II. N ≤ A
A. कोई अनस
ु रण नहीीं करता। B. केवऱ C2 अनस
ु रण करता है ।
C. या तो C1 या C2 इस प्रकार है । D. केवऱ C1 अनस
ु रण करता है ।
E. C1 और C2 दोनों का पाऱन करते हैं।
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
26. कथन: K < M < J, L < M≤ O, J = T > F
ननष्कर्ष: I. K < T II. J > O III. F < K
A. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष I अनस
ु रण करता है । B. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष II और III अनस
ु रण करता है ।
C. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष III अनस
ु रण करता है D. सभी ननष्कर्ष ई का अनस
ु रण करते हैं।
E. ननष्कर्ष का कोई भी अनुसरण नहीीं करता है
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
31. कथन: U = V < W, V ≥ S = T, S < Y ≤ Z
ननष्कर्ष: I. W > T II. T < Y
A. ननष्कर्ष I अनस
ु रण करता है B. ननष्कर्ष II ननम्नानस
ु ार है
C. दोनों ननष्कर्ष I और II अनस
ु रण करते हैं D. या तो ननष्कर्ष I या II अनस
ु रण करता है
E. ननष्कर्ष का कोई भी अनुसरण नहीीं करता है ।
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
36. कथन: L = M < N < O, N < P = Q ≥ R, Q ≤ S = T > U
ननष्कर्ष: I. L < S II. P > U
A. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष I अनस
ु रण करता है B. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष II अनस
ु रण करता है
C. या तो ननष्कर्ष I या ननष्कर्ष II अनस
ु रण करता है । D. दोनों ननष्कर्ों का अनस
ु रण करते हैं
E. ननष्कर्ों में से कोई भी अनुसरण नहीीं करता है ।
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
41. कथन: a ≥ b = c, b = d ≤ e
ननष्कर्ष: I. a = e II. c = d
A. ननष्कर्ष I अनस
ु रण करता है । B. या तो ननष्कर्ष I या II अनस
ु रण करता है ।
C. ननष्कर्ष II इस प्रकार है । D. दोनों ननष्कर्ों का पाऱन करते हैं।
E. ननष्कर्ष का कोई भी अनुसरण नहीीं करता है ।
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
46. कथन : T > D ≥ P, F ≥ P = R
ननष्कर्ा : T > R , D > F
A. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष I अनस
ु रण करता है । B. केवऱ ननष्कर्ष II अनस
ु रण करता है ।
C. ननष्कर्ष I और II दोनों अनस
ु रण करते हैं। D. न तो ननष्कर्ष I और न ही ननष्कर्ष II अनस
ु रण करता है ।
E. या तो ननष्कर्ष I या ननष्कर्ष II अनुसरण करता है ।
ददशा-ननदे श: इस प्रश्न में , ददए गए कथन में विभिन्न तत्िों के बीच सम्बन्ध को दशााया गया है | ददए गए
कथन से ननकऱे जा सकने िाऱे ननष्कर्ा/ननष्कर्ों को चन
ु कर उत्तर अंककत करे |
48. ननम्नभऱखित ननष्कर्ों में से कौन सा ददए गए कथन - L > M < O ≤ R = P ≥ Q का अनुसरण
नह ं करता है ?
A. P ≥ O B. Q < O C. M < R D. Q ≤ R E. P > M
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
CORRECT ANSWERS:
1 B 11 A 21 D 31 C 41 C
2 E 12 B 22 C 32 D 42 B
3 B 13 E 23 C 33 A 43 A
4 B 14 A 24 E 34 A 44 C
5 E 15 E 25 B 35 C 45 B
6 B 16 C 26 A 36 A 46 A
7 D 17 E 27 B 37 D 47 E
8 E 18 A 28 C 38 E 48 B
9 D 19 B 29 B 39 B 49 D
10 C 20 D 30 C 40 A 50 B
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
Explanations:
Combining both the equations to find the relationship between T and V, we get
T≤K=E≤Q<H≤S≤V
Clearly, the common sign of inequalities between T and V is of '<' and the given conclusion is T < V. C1,
hence, follows.
H≤S≤V<O
Clearly, the common sign between O and H is of '<' and the given conclusion is O ≥ H. C2, hence, does
not follow.
G≥B≥C
Clearly, the common sign of inequalities between G and C is of '≥'. Conclusion C < G is hence stays false
individually as the relationship is G ≥ C or C ≤ G.
Clearly, the common sign of inequalities between G and C is of '≥'. Conclusion G = C is hence stays false
individually as the relationship is G ≥ C or C ≤ G.
But if we combine both the individual conclusions, we'll get that either C < G or C = G.
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
3. Statements: H ≤ L< S ≤ K , S = G ≥ I > Q, U ≤ B < N = C = I
Conclusions: I. B < S II. H < Q
S=G≥I=C=N>B
Clearly, the common sign of inequalities between S and B is of '>'. Conclusion S > B or B < S is hence
stays true. C1, hence, follows.
H ≤ L< S = G ≥ I > Q
Clearly, there are opposite signs between H and Q , hence we can't define a relationship between
them. C2, hence, doesn't follow.
S≥K≥B<C
Here, we get opposite signs between S and C and the given conclusion is S > C, thus, we cannot define
any relation between S and C. Hence, conclusion I does not follow.
S≥K≥B
Here, the common sign between S and B is ‘≥’ and the given conclusion is S ≥ B. Hence, conclusion II
follows.
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
5. Statements: Y ≤ D < N, N≥W
Conclusions: D > W, Y≤W
For conclusion I: D > W
Here, we get opposite sign between D and W and the given conclusion is D > W, thus, we cannot define
any relation between D and W. Hence, conclusion I does not follow.
Y≤D<N≥W
Again, we get opposite signs between Y and W and the given conclusion is Y ≤ W, thus we cannot
define any relation between Y and W. Hence, conclusion II does not follow.
Hence, the correct answer would be ‘Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows’.
L≥Z=R
Here, the common sign between L and R is ‘≥’ and the given conclusion is L = R. Hence, conclusion I
does not follow.
R<U<J
Here, the common sigh between R and J is ‘<’ and the given conclusion is J > R. Hence, conclusion II
follow.
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
7. Statement: S ≤ M < X = H ≥ B ≥ K < V
Conclusion: X > K, K=X
For conclusion I and II: X > K and K = X
X=H≥B≥K
Here, the common sign between X and K is ‘≥’ and the given conclusions are X > K and K = X. Hence,
either conclusion I or conclusion II follows.
E<T<X
Here, the common sign between X and E is ‘>’ and the given conclusion is X < E. Hence, conclusion I
does not follow.
Again here, the common sign between X and E is ‘>’ and the given conclusion is X = E. Hence,
conclusion II does not follow.
Hence, the correct answer would be ‘Neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.
W>R≥U≥N≥Y≥B
Clearly, the common sign of inequalities between B and W is of '>'.Thus B < W or W > B is the correct
relationship. C1, hence, does not follow.
F=U≥N≥Y
Clearly, the common sign between F and Y is '≥'. Thus conclusion F ≥ Y is absolutely true. C2, hence
follows.
C>A≥R=E=K≥T
Clearly, the common sign of inequalities between C and T is of '>'. Conclusion T < C or C > T is hence
stays true. C1, hence, follows.
R=E=K>I
Clearly, the common sign between R and I is ">". Thus R > I is absolutely true. C2, hence follows as well.
L<A≤U=E
Here, the common sign between E and L is '<' . Thus 'E < L' or 'E > L'.
Hence conclusion I follows.
X>W=E≥Y>Q
Clearly, the common sign of inequalities between X and Q is of '>'. Conclusion X > Q is hence stays true.
C1, hence, follows.
P=T>U≤E>O>R
Clearly, the opposite sign are there between P and R. Thus no relationship can be established between
them. C2, hence does not follow.
O≤E=N≤L
Clearly, the common sign of inequalities between O and L is of '≤'. Conclusion O < L is hence stays false
individually as the relationship is O ≤ L or L ≥ O.
Clearly, the common sign of inequalities between O and L is of '≤'. Conclusion O < L is hence stays false
individually as the relationship is O ≤ L or L ≥ O.
But if we combine both the individual conclusions, we'll get that either O < L or O = L.
P≥B>N=Q
Clearly, the common sign of inequalities between P and Q is of '>'.Thus Q < P or P > Q is the correct
relationship. C1, hence, does not follow.
R<T=Q=N≤M=K>F
Clearly, opposite sign is there between F and R. Thus no relationship can be established between them.
C2, hence does not follow as well.
T<G<Q=L
Here, the common sign between T and L is ‘<’ and the given conclusion is T < L, hence conclusion I
follows.
K<Y<W=M
Here, the common sign between K and M is '<' and the given conclusion is K < M, hence conclusion II
follows
From statements II and III: E > W > U = D, we get common sign of ‘>’ between E and D, hence, E > D
follows.
From statements I, II and III: M > D = U < E > B, we get opposite signs between B and M, hence, B > M
does not follow.
A=X≥L≥Z
Here, the common sign between A and Z is ‘≥’ and the given conclusion is A < Z, hence, A < Z does not
follows.
Z=E≤J≤F
Here, common sign between Z and F ‘≤’ and the given conclusion is Z > F, hence, Z > F does not follows.
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
18. Only conclusion I follows.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
H=I=K>L≥M
As, “>”, is the highest priority sign in the combination so, “H > M”, is the true relation between H and
M.
K>L>F≤S
As, sign between “K” and “S” are in different direction so, this conclusion does not follow.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
1. > and <
2. ≥ and ≤
3. =
For conclusion I: C ≤ L
C<E=F<K≤L
As, “<”, is having highest priority, therefore, this conclusion does not follow.
E>C=D
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
1. > and <
2. ≥ and ≤
3. =
B≤X≤P
Both the objects of conclusions I and II are same i.e. ‘P’ and ‘B’.
Both the conclusions I and II are wrong.
On combining both the relations we get the actual relation i.e. P ≥ B
So,
We can observe that between Q and X, the common sign of inequality is of '>' which confirms Q > X
which is given as conclusion I.
For C2,
We can observe that between E and A the signs are getting reversed and hence we can't derive a
definite conclusion between these two elements. C2, hence, doesn't follow.
Combining eq (i) and (ii) for the relation between B and L & K and B, we get
D > Q > N ≥ M and
N<Q<D
Common sign between D and M is of '>'. Thus, the given conclusion D ≥ M is not valid.
Now, common sign between N and D (moving from N to D) is '<' and the given conclusion is N < D.
Hence C2 follows.
Conclusions: I. C ≤ X II. E ≥ A
From (i), between C and X the common sign of inequalities between C and X is '≤'. Therefore, C ≤ X is
true. C1, hence, follows.
Now, between E and A the common sign of inequalities is '≥'. Therefore, E ≥ A is true as well. Hence, C2
follows as well.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
1. > and <
2. ≥ and ≤
3. =
For Conclusion I:S > Y
Combining statements I and III:
S < T<K = Y
As ‘<’ is the prior sign between S and Y, the true relation between S and Y is ‘<’.
K<T≤C
As ‘<’ is having the highest priority between K and C, the true relation between K and C is ‘<’.
As the chain breaks between G and T, no relation can be established between them.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
1. > and <
2. ≥ and ≤
3. =
For Conclusion I:U = X
Combining statements I and II:
U ≥Y ≥ X = Z
As ‘≥’ is having highest priority between U and X. Thus the true relation between U and X is ‘≥’.
U≥Y≥X=Z
As ‘≥’ is having highest priority between U and X. Thus the true relation between U and X is ‘≥’.
Individually conclusion I and conclusion II does not follow but either of them follows as the relation is
‘≥’.
W ≤ L < U≥Y ≥ X = Z
As the chain breaks between L and Z, no relation can be established between them.
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
1. > and <
2. ≥ and ≤
3. =
For Conclusion I:K < T
K<M<J=T
As ‘<’ is the prior sign between K and T, the true relation between K and T is ‘<’.
J>M≤O
As the chain breaks between J and O, no relation can be established between them.
K <J = T > F
As the chain breaks between F and K, no relation can be established between them.
27. Explanation
Only conclusions II and III follow.
Option B, is hence the correct answer.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
1. > and <
2. ≥ and ≤
3. =
For Conclusion I:Q > M
Combining statements I and II:
Q>P<M
As the chain breaks between Q and M, thus relationship between them can’t be established.
S≥M=T>U
As ‘>’ is having highest priority here, the true relation between S and U is ‘>’.
S≥M=T
As ‘≥’ is having highest priority here, the true relation between S and T is ‘≥’.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
1. > and <
2. ≥ and ≤
3. =
For Conclusion I:A ≤ G
Combining statements I, II and III:
As, we can see a chain break between A and G. Thus no relation can be obtained between them.
C = B < D ≤ E≤ F
As, ‘<’ is having highest priority, the true relation between C and F can be obtained as ‘<’.
C=B<D≤E≤F
As, ‘<’ is having highest priority, the true relation between C and F can be obtained as ‘<’.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
1. > and <
2. ≥ and ≤
3. =
For conclusion I: N > T
N≤O≥R>S=T
As, the signs between N and T are in opposite direction, hence the relation cannot be concluded.
P≥O>R>S=T
As, “>” is having highest priority in all the signs present here, so P > T is the true relation.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
1. > and <
2. ≥ and ≤
3. =
T≥U≥W=X≥Y
As, “ ≥” sign is having the highest priority here in all the signs, so,
T ≥ Y is the actual relation.
T≥U≥W=X≥Y
As, “ ≥” sign is having the highest priority here in all the signs, so,
Both the objects of conclusions I and II are same i.e. ‘T’ and ‘Y’.
Both the conclusions I and II are wrong.
On combining both the relations we get the actual relation i.e. T ≥ Y
So,
Either conclusion I or conclusion II follows.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion.
Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects whose relation is to
be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
1. > and <
2. ≥ and ≤
3. =
W>V≥S=T
As, “>” is highest prior sigh here, so, the conclusion follows.
T=S<Y
As, “<” is highest prior sigh here, so, the conclusion follows.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
1. > and <
2. ≥ and ≤
3. =
A≥B≥E
A≥B≥E
Both the objects of conclusions I and II are same i.e. ‘A’ and ‘E’.
Both the conclusions I and II are wrong.
On combining both the relations we get the actual relation i.e. A ≥ E
So,
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
1. > and <
2. ≥ and ≤
3. =
F=G≤K<M
H>G≤K≥L
As, sign between H and L are in opposite direction, hence this conclusion does not follows.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
1. > and <
2. ≥ and ≤
3. =
Z=T≤K<M
H>T≤K≥L
As, sign between H and L are in opposite direction, hence this conclusion does not follows.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
1. > and <
2. ≥ and ≤
3. =
B≥C≥E
B≥C≥E
Both the objects of conclusions I and II are same i.e. ‘B’ and ‘E’.
Both the conclusions I and II are wrong.
On combining both the relations we get the actual relation i.e. B ≥ E
So,
Either conclusion I or conclusion II follows.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
1. > and <
2. ≥ and ≤
3. =
L=M<N<P=Q≤S
As, “<” sign , is the highest priority sign here, so the true relation is L < S.
P=Q≤S=T>U
As, the signs between P and U are in opposite direction so, this conclusion does not follows.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
X=Y≥C
As, “≥” sign is having higher priority than “=” sign so the actual relation is X ≥ C
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
K>E<F
As, the signs between K and F are in opposite direction hence the conclusion does not follow.
D≤E<G
As, “>” is having higher priority than “≥”, so the actual relation is G > D.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
J=I≥K
As, “≥” is having higher priority than “=”, so the actual relation is J ≥ K.
J=I≥K
As, “≥” is having higher priority than “=”, so the actual relation is J ≥ K
Both the objects of conclusions I and II are same i.e. ‘J’ and ‘K’.
Both the conclusions I and II are wrong.
On combining both the relations we get the actual relation i.e. J ≥ K
So,
Either conclusions I or conclusion II follows.
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us
40. Conclusion I follows.
Option A, is hence the correct answer.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
Q>P≥S
As, “>” sign is having higher priority than “≥” so, the true relation is Q > S
R>Q>P≥S=T
As, “>” sign is having higher priority than “≥ and =” signs so, the true relation is
R > T is the actual relation; hence the conclusion does not follow.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
a≥b=d≤e
As, the signs between a and e are in opposite direction so the chain breaks and the conclusion does not
follows.
c=b=d
So, the conclusion II follows.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
B≤E≤F≤H=G
As, “≤” sign is having higher priority than “=” sign so the actual relation is B ≤ G.
For conclusion II: B = H
B≤E≤F≤H=G
As, “≤” sign is having higher priority than “=” sign so the actual relation is B ≤ H.
We can see that individually neither of the conclusions follows , but if we combine both the
conclusions, we see that B < G or B = G.
As G = H, so the above two conditions will fall for B and H also i.e. B < H or B = H.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
J<K≤L=M
As, “<” sign is having higher priority than “=” and "≤" signs so the actual relation is J < M.
Thus the conclusion follows.
O=P≤N<M=L
As, “<” sign is having higher priority than “=” and "≤" signs so the actual relation is P < L.
Thus conclusion does not follow.
Common explanation:
There is a priority order of the symbols according to which the priority of the symbol is decided to
reach the conclusion. Whenever there are two or more type of symbols are there between two objects
whose relation is to be determine we have to use this order.
If the direction of sign is opposite between that two objects, no relation can be stated perfectly and we
have to say that it does not follow.
Priority Order:
W=U=V>R=S≥T
As, “>” sign is having higher priority than “=” and "≥" signs so the actual relation is W > R.
Thus the conclusion does not follow.
V=U>R=S≥T
As, “>” sign is having higher priority than “=” and "≥" signs so the actual relation is V > T.
Thus conclusion follows.
Y≥P<R
Here, we get opposite signs between Y and R and the given conclusion is R > Y, thus we cannot define
any relation between R and Y. Hence, conclusion I does not follow.
O=P<R≤J
Here, the common sign between O and J is < and the given conclusion is J > O.
Therefore, conclusion II follows.
T>D≥P=R
D≥P≤F
Here, we can see the opposite sign between D and F, thus no relationship can be established between
them.
Therefore, conclusion II does not follow.
24
Downstream speed = = 4.8 km/hr
5
4.8 – 4
Speed of current = = 0.4 km/hr
2
L>M<O≤R=P≥Q
From this we can clearly see that O and P are having '≤' as common sign. Thus O ≤ P or P ≥ O follows.
Thus option A follows.
L>M<O≤R=P≥Q
From this we can clearly see that O and Q are having opposite signs. Thus no relation can be
established between them.
Thus, option B does not follow.
For the given statements, let us check all the options one by one.
T=N>P
For the given statements, let us check all the options one by one.
Y=Z<W=G
Z<W=G
www.smartkeeda.com | testzone.smartkeeda.com
https:// /#
SBI | RBI | IBPS |RRB | SSC | NIACL | EPFO | UGC NET |LIC | Railways | CLAT | RJS
Join us