Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
The dead-space carrier multiplication theory properly predicts the reduction in the excess noise
factor in a number of APDs. The theory is applied to measurements, obtained from J. C. Campbell and
collaborators at the University of Texas, for InP, InAlAs, GaAs, and A1GaAs APDs with multiplication-
region widths ranging from 80 nm to 1600 nm. A refined model for the ionization coefficients is reported
that is independent of the width of the device multiplication region of each device. In addition, in
comparison to predictions from the conventional multiplication theory, the dead-space multiplication
theory predicts a reduction in the mean bandwidth as well as a reduction in the power spectral density
of the impulse response. In particular, it is shown that the avalanching noise at high-frequencies is
reduced as a result of the reduction of the multiplication region width.
Keywords: Avalanche photodiode, dead space, impact ionization, excess noise factor, avalanche
breakdown down, frequency response.
1 Introduction
It is well known that for avalanche photodiodes (APDs) with thin multiplication regions, the con-
ventional (McIntyre) carrier-multiplication theory' does not correctly predict the reduction in the noise
characteristics. This reduced noise characteristic of thin APDs has been established by both experi-
ments and Monte-Carlo simulations.26 The inadequacy of the conventional theory to explain the noise
reduction has been attributed primarily to the inability of the conventional multiplication model to
capture the dead-space effect. The dead space is the minimum distance a newly-created carrier must
travel before it is capable of effecting a new impact ionization.
Using excess-noise versus mean-gain data for thin GaAs, AlGaAs, InP, and InAlAs APDs, collected
by J. C. Campbell and collaborators at the University of Texas at Austin, it has been shown that the
dead-space multiplication theory (DSMT), developed earlier by Hayat et al.,7 resolves the discrepancy
1E-Mail: mliayat©udaytoii.edu, Telephoiie (937) 229-4521, Fax: (937) 229-2097
Physics and Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices IX, Yasuhiko Arakawa, Peter Blood, Marek Osinski,
Editors, Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 4283 (2001) © 2001 SPIE · 0277-786X/01/$15.00 519
where he() and h11(x) are the probability density functions (pdf's) of random free-path lengths of the
electron and hole, respectively. Let a and /3 be the electron and hole physical ionization coefficients,
respectively. Then, a simple hard-dead-space model for the above pdf's is given by7
h(x) = ae1u(x —
de) (3)
h,, (x) = €'"u(x —
dIL) , (4)
where u(x) is the unit step function. The solutions to (1) and (2) are in turn used to determine the
mean gain using
(G)= (z(O)+1). (5)
— Z2(O)+2Z(O)+1 '
F—
(z(O)+1)2
where z2(x) and Y2(X) are the second-order moments which are governed by the following recurrence
relations7:
= [1 -
- :x
Z2(X) he() d] +y2(e) +4z()y() +2z2(e)Ihe(e - x)de (7)
Y2(X) = [1
/ hJL(e) del +.0/
.0 [2Y2(e) + Z2() + 4z()y(e) + 2y2()J hh(x - )d (8)
The recurrence equations (1), (2), (7) and (8) can be solved, for example, by means of a simple iterative
numerical technique.
The key idea that enables the development of the statistics of Ze (t, C) , Zh (t, ) , Ye (t, cc) , and (t, x)
is based on a renewal argument. For example, consider the quantity Z (t, x) and suppose for the moment
that an initial parent electron (at x) first impact ionizes at location > x. In this case, there will be
two newly created electrons and a hole at the location . Each of the two electrons and the hole will
independently induce an avalanche process at the new location with a time equal to t less the electron
transit time from x to . This type of renewal argument is also used to characterize the mean and the
variance of 1(t).12 In this subsection, we show how this argument is used to derive the autocorrelation
function of 1(t). We present the key steps and defer the complete derivation and the detailed final
recurrence relations to a later time.
Let R(t1, t2) be the autocorrelation of 1(t) defined as E[I(t1)I(t2)J. Clearly, in order to com-
pute the autocorrelation function, it is imperative to calculate the autocorrelations CZe (t1, t2, x) =
E[Ze(ti,)Ze(t2,)] and Czh(tl,t2, x) = E[Z,(tl,x)Z,L(t2, x)] as well as the crosscorrelation Cz(ti,t2,x) =
E[Ze(ti, x)Z11(t2, x)]. For brevity, we will present the recurrence equation only for Cz(t1, t2, x).
To do so, we first condition on the location where the parent electron (created at x) first im-
pact ionizes. Conditional on this location being (note that x), then the conditional mean of
Ze(tl,X)Ze(t2,X) given e can be written as
E[Ze(ti,x)Ze(t2,x)Ie] = _ + z'(t1 - ( - x)/v,) + Ye(ti _ ( _ X)/Ve))
E[(Z(ti (e _ x)/v,)
x -
(z(t2 ( - X)/Ve,)
+ z'(t2 _ ( _ x)/ve,) + Ye(t2 _ ( x)/vee))]
where Z(t1 — ( — x)/ve,e) and Z'(t1 — ( — x)/v,e) correspond to the regenerated and the newly-
generated electrons at , respectively, and the term corresponds to the hole generated
at . The delay term (c — x)/v 5 the parent-electron transit time between positions x and . Since the
pdf of the electron lifetime is known, we can average (10) over all possible values of . Note, however,
that the expression in (10) is only valid if both ti and t2 exceed the electron transit time to the first
impact ionization, given by ti < ( — X)/Ve. For example, if t1 < t2 and t1 < ( — x)/ve, then we must
rewrite (10) as
i,
mirl(x+vet2)
+
/
min(x+veti '11))
{2Ze(t2 — i, s) + ye(t2 — s)} h(s — x)ds
+ Tz — )z(s'TV — (s'TV + —
)fl(s'TV — (s'TV
+ — 'TV z(s — 'TV s)z — sp(x (UT)
= s) —
'a/(x pu V =
5flTA Jo 'i)z 'j)(x '(x AJATpdsi
'1a/(s ptT aq suoTpunJ
—
qj
pndmo3 uTsu
(x pu
q (x
uoip2nbo
uu1
ioj
'z unni'z tp
um sIndmT suodsi TUOPUUJ 'puTd uoipunj H si ATInmnD ijiqqo.id uoTnqTisTp
&npuodsnoDo
'(')'Z3 U2 ('t)Z3
jpd at,' y npmis nbTuqD psn o AW uq
uoiprnb ioj A3 (x unnzi ') C
UMO)jIi IOA
qj uMopp2iq oqoi q pujp s s2Tq-s1Ai IOA u U2UI up
suioq oiurn oj zuopnp sq 'uoiipuo pipun ui ssApu sqi uo ;q 3Todmsi
T4DTT4A
-ii ivisu sq uoq pi1dd o pumiidxo snsi puuqo moij yç Jqdm3 1OJ
Sy pu iom uzi
pOi3OSS 4TM S3TAp
.xoj dUl
SflOUlA 'SqpTM
pui syyuj sudv M jqi o
U%
uoipziuoi su3qp;oD j
S 1 UOiDUflJ JO t{ DTiDJ 'pjj UiT4TM t4 SUJUOD JO %
uis puuuodx 'jpom s uoqs T ioj) 'A4TAoiq OT4 UOipO UOTZTUOT UTZYg4OD JO, dUl
s (uioqs .
qj poqm ioj uijn pDTsAqd UOTZTUOI SUT3fflO3 Si pqiiDsp S2 :soTToJ () UAID
ppou jo ppjj moij) s12Tq-os1Ai (IoA prn ippii jo
qt uoTpDiJdTJnm
pp
quiini
uoii uop
(ii) io
mo.ij
oq
ui
uoiziuoi
suoiprnb ioj
poqsiq 'siiou
pu
uoipp
siou
prn
pinsom un pu siou-ssox iop 'ind iudoidd SOflT1A iOJ X
iopj
joq
siqj
s3ds 0112 pndmo3
ssx
s!
q
ouop q upPs ds
pi
uoiziuoT suiojjjo Ui uiinca suoT4nb ptre A1unbsqns UTA2[1A m;ti
piiui Sfl2A ioj
qj
no 'i) umoi
pidi
tn
snoiA1dainpDoid si
qii (uminsm pu
.ioj iqo pnsim SflA jo un prn
ui ssx
sou iop i2 pouTqo (
siou iopij AT)( ssx )
U4M siou-ui pp suiod 'pSfl1qX T4 ITh4JflSt UOTZTUOi SUTDfflOD PT:J u
pn
piipus 1iiuuodx
uisn i
pu
j
sitrniid jo
siqj s4JduioD
piuuodx iq) IOJ
pUflO1-SiJ UOT2Tfl3I%D JO TT4
(iui i2
JpoTTT .IoJ
4 Conclusion
We reported an improved technique for calculating models for the electron and hole ionization
coefficients in GaAs, AlGaAs, InP, and InAlAs APDs. For each material, these models were shown to
be independent of the width of the multiplication region of each device. The improvement in the model
is achieved by means of optimizing the model parameters over the theoretical ionization threshold
energies. Using these models in conjunction with the dead-space multiplication theory, we correctly
predicted the gain-noise characteristics of the above APDs for a variety of multiplication-region widths.
The frequency response and the power-spectral density were also computed in the confines of the dead-
space multiplication theory. It is clear that for thin APDs, the effect of dead space is significant on
5 Aknowledgement
The authors are thankful to Professor Joe C. Campbell for providing all the experimental data used in
this paper. We are also thankful to Dr. Paul Sotirelis for assisting us with high-performance computing
issues and facilitating the use of the ASC/MSRC computing facilities located the Wright-Patterson Air
Force Base, Ohio.
4 4.5 5 5.5 6
ELECTRIC FIELD (V/cm)
6.5 7 5 10 15 20
x 105 MEAN GAIN (G)
Figure 1: Electron ionization coefficient (a) of Figure 2: The DSMT predictions of the gain
InP as a function of the electric field. vs. noise characteristics for thin InP APDs.
30
I025
N
Io20
0
Z 15
cr3
10
9
5
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1010 1014
WIDTH (nm) FREQUENCY (Hz)
Figure 3: Comparison between the conven- Figure 4: Conventional and DSMT predictions
tional and DSMT predictions of the 3-dB of the frequency response for three devices:
bandwidth for GaAs APDs of varying thick- lOOnm, 400 nm, and 800 nm GaAs APDs.
ness.
,x io
riIi1T(f—
- - IS(f)1112
5
-- GaAs lOOnm
dead space
C)
0
LU
C,)
LU
Figure 5: Power-spectral density of a 100 nm GaAs APD along with the frequency response.
[ 3] V. Chaiicliarriouli, C. M. Maziar. and J. C. Campbell, "Design considerations for high perforinaiice avalaiiche
photodiode multiplication layers," IEEE Trans. Electron Dee., vol. 41, pp. 648—654, 1994.
[ 4] C. Hu, K. A. Anselni. B. G. Streetrnaii, and J. C. Campbell. 'Noise characteristics of thin multiplication
region GaAs avalanche photodiodes," Appi. Phys. Lelt., vol. 69, pp. 3734—3736, 1996.
[ 5] C. Lenox. P. Yuan, H. Nie, 0. Bakleriov. C. Hansing. J. C. Cariipbell. A. L. Holmes. Jr.. and B. G.
Streetman, Tliiri multiplication region InAlAs homojunctiori avalanche photodiodes." Appi. Phys. Lett.,
vol. 73, pp. 783-784, 1998.
[ 6J K. A. Anselrn. P. Yuan, C. Hu, C. Leriox, H. Nie, G. Kinsey, J. C. Campbell. and B. G. Streetinan, 'Charac-
teristics of GaAs and AlGaAs homojunction avalanche photodiodes with thin multiplication regions," Appi.
Phys. Lett., vol. 71, pp. 3883—3885, 1997.
[ 7] M. M. Hayat, B. E. A. Saleh. and M. C. Teich, "Effect of dead space on gain arid noise of double-carrier-
multiplication avalanche photodiodes," IEEE Trans. Eiect. Dev., vol. 39. pp. 546—552, 1992.
[ 8J M. M. Hayat, W. L. Sargearit, arid B. E. A. Saleh, "Effect of dead space on gain arid noise in Si arid GaAs
avalanche photodiodes," IEEE J. Quantum Eiectro'n.. , vol. 28, pp. 1360—1365, 1992
[9] M. A. Saleh, M. M. Hayat, B. E. A. Saleh, arid M. C. Teich, Dead-space-based theory correctly predicts
excess noise factor for thin GaAs and AlGaAs APDs," IEEE Trans. Eiect. Dev., vol. 47, pp. 625-633, 2000.
[ 10] P. Yuan, K. A. Anselrn, C. Hu, H. Nie, C. Lenox, H. L. Holmes, B. G. Streetrnan, J. C. Carripbell, and R. J.
McIntyre. A new look at impact ioruzatiori-Part II: Gain and noise in short avalanche photodiodes," IEEE
Trans. Electron. Dev., vol. 46, pp. 1632-4639, 1999.
[ 11] P. Yuan, C. C. Hansirig, K. A. Ariselm, C. V. Leriox, H. Nie, H. L. Holmes, B. G. Streetman, and J. C.
Canipbell, Irripact ionization characteristics of ITT-V semiconductors for a wide range of multiplication
region thicknesses," IEEE J. Quantum Eiectrom., vo. 36, no. 2, pp. 198-204, 2000.
[ 12] M. M. Hayat and B. E. A. Saleh, Statistica1 properties of the impulse response function of double-carrier
multiplication avalanche 1)hotodiodes including the efkct of dead space," J. Lightwave Technol. , vol. 10,
PP 1415-1425, 1992.
[ 13] Y. Okuto and C. R. Crowell, LIonization coefficients in semiconductors: A nonlocalized property," Phys.
Rev. B, vol. 10, pp. 4284-4296, 1974.
[141 T. P. Pearsall, Thresiiold energies for impact ionization by electrons and holes in TriP," Appi. Phys. Lett.,
vol. 35, pp. 168—170, 1979.
[15] I. Watanabe, T. Toshitaka, K. Taguchi, "Monte carlo simulation of impact ionization rates in InAlAs-IriGaAs
Siuare and graded barrier superlattice ," IEEE J. Quantwrn Eiectvon., vol. 31, no. 10 pp. 1826—1834, 1995.