Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COLLEGE OF LAW
CORPORATION LAW
1ST Semester SY 2021-2022
I. COURSE DESCRIPTION
A study about private corporations contemplated under the Revised Corporation Code of the
Philippines or Republic Act. No. 11232
1. Know the incorporation, organization and regulation of a private corporation, both stock and
nonstock, including religious, educational, foreign and one person corporations ;
2. Learn how to actually incorporate a corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission
through its online services under the Electronic Simplified Processing of Application for
Registration of Company ( SEC eSPARC);
3. Be informed of the powers, duties, responsibilities and liabilities of Directors, Trustees and officers
of the corporation, rights and liabilities of the stockholders or members, and conditions under
which the corporations may transact business ;
V. COURSE REQUIREMENTS
Online discussion, report and recitation 20%
Quizzes, Pre-lims, Mid-term and Final Examinations 60%
Project : Formulation of Article of Incorporation
and By-laws and actual filing with the S.E.C. 20%
100%
VI. COURSE METHODOLOGIES
VII. REFERENCES
TITLE I
A corporation is an artificial being created by operation of law, having the right of succession and
the powers, attributes and properties expressly authorized by law or incidental to its existence,
a. An Artificial Being:“A corporation is granted a juridical capacity to own properties, to contract and to
enter into legal relationships.”
b. Creature of the Law: “Each corporation is created by operation of law pursuant to a covenant to
pursue a business enterprise.”
c. With aRight of Succession: “A corporation has a juridical personality separate and distinct from its
stockholder or members, officers and directors or trustees.”
d. Creature of Limited Powers: “A corporation has only such powers, attributes and properties as are
expressly authorized by law or incidental to its existence.”
(i) STRONG/SOLEMN JURIDICAL PERSONALITY(Sec. 2; Arts. 44[3], 45 and 46, Civil Code)
While not in fact a person, the corporation is treated through fiction by the law as though it
were a person—an artificial person distinct and separate from its stockholders. Remo, Jr. v.
IAC, 172 SCRA 405 (1989).
Under [Section 22 of the Revised Corporation Code], save in those instances where the
Code requires stockholders’ approval for certain specific acts, it is the Board of
Directors/Trustees which exercises all the corporate powers in a corporation.
By virtue of the principle separate juridical personality, the corporate debts or credits are not
the those of the stockholders. This protection from corporate liability for shareholders is the
principle of limited liability. PNB v. Hydro Resources Contractors Corp., 693 SCRA 294 (2013).
(iv) FREE-TRANSFERABILITY OF “UNITS OF OWNERSHIP”(SHARES)(Sec. 62)
It is the inherent right of the stockholder to dispose of his shares of stock (which he owns as
any other property) anytime he so desires.
No corporation can restrict the right of a stockholder to transfer shares, but merely has
authority to adopt regulations on the formalities and procedure to be followed in effecting such
sale or transfer.
Relationships among stockholders are less personal since stockholders who wish to transfer
shares can transfer or assign his shares to any individual or entity without any approval from
other stockholders.
The corporation can outlive the stockholders/directors composing it since it can exist
forever unless it decides to shorten its term.
• Dividends received by individuals from domestic corporations are subject to final 10% tax for
income earned on or after 01 January 1998. Sec. 24(B)(2), 1997 NIRC.
• However, inter-corporate dividends between domestic corporations are not subject to any
income tax. Sec. 27(D)(4), 1997 NIRC.
• Re-imposition of the 10% “improperly accumulated earnings tax” for holding companies.
Sec. 29, 1997 NIRC.
Corporations cannot engage in the practice of a profession since they lack the moral and technical
competence required by the PRC. ULEP v. The Legal Clinic, 223 SCRA 378 (1993).
A practice of profession is not for commercial purpose and therefore should not be in corporate
form since corporations are generally created for profit.
A corporation, being and artificial person has no feelings, emotions nor senses, therefore it cannot
experience physical suffering and mental anguish. Mental suffering can be experienced only by one
having a nervous system and it flows from real ills, sorrows, and griefs of life—all of which cannot be
suffered by an artificial person Manila Electric Co.v. Nordec Philippines, 861 SCRA 515 2018
A corporation’s claim for moral damages arising from libel falls under Article 2219(7) of the Civil
Code, which expressly authorizes the recovery of moral damages in cases of libel, slander or any other
form of defamation, and does not qualify whether the plaintiff is a natural or juridical person. A juridical
person can validly complain for libel or any other form of defamation and claim for moral
damages.Filipinas Broadcasting Network v. Ago Medical and Educational Center, 448 SCRA 413
(2005).
A corporation, being an artificial person has no feelings, emotions nor senses; therefore, it cannot
experience physical suffering and mental anguish. Mental suffering can be experienced only by one
having a nervous system and it flows from real ills, sorrows, and griefs of life—all of which cannot be
suffered by an artificial person. Prime White Cement Corp. v. IAC, 220 SCRA 103 (1993); Manila
Electric Co. v. Nordec Philippines, 861 SCRA 515 (2018).
1. MAIN DOCTRINE:A Corporation Has a Personality Separate and Distinct from Its Directors or
Trustees, Officers, Its Stockholders or members
A corporation is a juridical entity with a legal personality separate and distinct from the people
comprising it,
The grant of legal or juridical personality, being a mere privilege, can be revoked anytime by the
sovereign power that granted the said privilege.
If the corporate fiction is used as a means to defeat public convenience, justify a wrong, protect
Fraud or defend a crime; or if the veil is used as a vehicle to evade an obligation or a debt, the veil
may be pierced and disregarded and the courts will treat the corporation as a mere aggrupation of
persons and the liability shall directly be attached to them.
• DEFEAT OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE (EQUITY PIERCING): When the application of the separate
corporate personality would be inconsistent with the business purpose of the legal fiction or
would merely confuse legitimate issues, or when piercing the corporate fiction is necessary
to achieve justice or equity for those who deal in good faith with the corporation. .
The main effect of disregarding the corporate fiction is that stockholders will be held personally
liable for the acts and contracts of the corporation, whose existence, at least for the purpose of the
particular situation involved, is ignored.
Another formulation of this doctrine is that when two (2) business enterprises are owned,
conducted and controlled by the same parties, both law and equity will, when necessary to protect
the rights of third parties, disregard the legal fiction that two corporations are distinct entitled and
treat them as identical or one and the same. General Credit Corp. v. Alsons Dev. and Investment
Corp., 513 SCRA 225 (2007).
(i) It Is aRemedy of Last Resort:Piercing the corporate veil is remedy of last resort and is not
available when other remedies are still available.
(ii) Available Only to Prevent Fraud or to Achieve an Equitable End: Piercing doctrine is
meant to prevent fraud, and cannot be employed when the net result would be to perpetrate
fraud or a wrong.
(iii) Piercing the Veil of Corporate fiction Is a Power Belonging to the Courts
• There must have been fraud or an evil motive in the affected transaction, and the mere proof of
control of the corporation by itself would not authorize piercing;
• Corporate fiction is used as a means to commit the fraud or avoid the consequences thereof;
and
* The main action should seek for theenforcement of pecuniary claims pertaining to the
corporation against corporate officers and stockholders.
3. ALTER EGOPIERCING CASES:
a. Using the Corporation as a Mere Conduit or Alter Ego:
Guiding Principles in Alter-Ego Cases:
• Doctrine applies even in the absence of evil intent, because of the direct violation of a central
corporate law principle of separating ownership from management;
• Doctrine in such cased is based on estoppel: if stockholders do not respect the separate entity,
others cannot also be expected to be bound by the separate juridical entity;
• Piercing in alter ego cases may prevail even when no monetary claims are sought to be
enforced against the stockholders or officers of the corporation.
Section 3 - Classes of Corporation
Section 4 – Corporations created by special laws or charters
As to number of components
Corporation Sole
Corporation aggregate
As to functions:/in relation to the State
Public corporation (LGUs)
Private Corporation
Quasi-Public corporation.
-Local water districts -performing public services, supplying public wnts (organized and created
nder PD 168); may also exercise the powers, rights and privileges given to private corps.
As to legal status
De jure corporation - corporation organized in accordance with the requirements of the law
De facto corporation - formed where there exists a flaw in its incorporation but there is colorable
Compliance with the requirements of the law
Corporation by estoppel –a group of persons who misrepresent themselves as a corporation and
enter into contract with a third person on the strength of such
appearance cannot be permitted to deny its existence in an action
under said contract.
As to existence of stocks:
Stock
Non stock
As to laws of incorporation
Domestic
Foreign
As to relationship
Parent/holding corporation – a company who has control over another corporation directly or
Indirectly through one or more intermediaries;
- a company which owns all or substantially or the controlling
shares In the subsidiary.
Subsidiary – a corporation more than 50% of the capital stocks is owned or controlled directly
or indirectly through one or more intermediaries by another corporation, which
becomes a parent company
Common—voting shares
Preferred or redeemable shares—non-voting shares
Par value
No par value shares