Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The address for services of all notices and process on the respondents are the
same as stated above.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit it is prayed that this
Section 16 (2) (c) read with Rule 36 (4) of Goods and Service Tax Act and
provides that the recipient is not entitled to take ITC if supplier hasn’t paid
collected tax to the Government and pass such further or other Orders as
this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances
WRIT PETITION
The address for services of all notices and processes on the petitioner above
named is that of his Counsel M/s. K.P. ABDUL AZEES, S. KRISHNA KUMAR,
AKHIL SURESH and T.ARCHANA Advocates, having Chamber at No.14,
Lawyers Chamber, High Court Building, Madurai 625 023 and Office at Plot
No.123, A.R.Hospital Road, K.K.Nagar, Madurai 625 020.
-2-
The address for services of all notices and process on the respondents are the
same as stated above.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit it is prayed that this
the file of the 4th respondent and quash the same as illegal and
consequently the 4th respondent to allow input credit to the petitioner and
from the eligible refund of the Petitioner and pass such further or other
Orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and
WRIT PETITION
SYNOPSIS
owned by the fifth respondent on rent basis for the period from August 2018
to May 2019. During this period, the fifth respondent had raised invoices
31,57,846/-). The entire amount was paid by the Petitioner to the fifth
respondent did not remit the same to the tune of Rs 31,57,846/- Hence, this
Writ Petition.
-2-
Sl.No
Dates Events
.
1. Proceedings issued by the 4th respondent to the
17.02.2021
petitioner (impugned Order)
2. Representation of the petitioner to the fourth
04.05.2021
respondent.
3. Representation of the petitioner to the fourth
28.06.2021
respondent
SYNOPSIS
As per section 16 (2) (c) of the GST Act 2017, a recipient can avail
Input Tax Credit only if the supplier remitted the collected tax to the
Government. Invoking the above provisions, the fourth respondent,
disallowed the ITC claim of the Petitioner and was directed to reverse the
same. So also, the supplier did not concede in the return so as to reflect in
Form GSTR 2A as provided under Sub rule (4) to Rule 36 of the Central
Goods and Service Tax Act. For the reasons that the supplier did not file
return and paid tax, the Petitioner has been denied the benefit of ITC. This
is an onerous provision which is illegal and unconstitutional. Hence this
Writ Petition.
-2-