Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rating
S 1. Work effectively with others
Person Evaluator
1 Is aggressive and unfriendly, does not get on well with fellow workers
2 Is not helpful and does not work as a team player.
3 Co-operates when requested. Has to be drawn in as a team player
4 Co-operates at all times. Friendly and helpful most of the time.
5 Co-operates at all times. Shows enthusiasm. Helpful and friendly all the time, always
part of the team and show initiative to lead
Rating
S 2. Communication Skills
Person Evaluator
1 Written & verbal communication skills poor
2 Written & verbal communication skills below average
3 Written & verbal communication skills acceptable (average)
4 Written & verbal communication skills good (above average)
5 Written & verbal communication skills excellent
Rating
S 3. Reliability
Person Evaluator
1 Reluctant to obey instructions. Always lazy. Absent / late for work in the mornings &
after breaks on a regular basis. Never uses own initiative. Not prepared to work
overtime.
2 Frequently does not carry out instructions. Never uses own initiative. Absent / late for
work in the mornings & after breaks on a regular basis. Will work overtime if forced.
3 Usually obeys instructions. Seldom uses own initiative. Sometimes absent / late for
work in the mornings & after breaks. Occasionally work overtime if forced.
4 Always obeys instructions. Hard working. Work thoroughly. Sometimes uses own
initiative. Occasionally work overtime. Seldom absent / late for work in the mornings &
after breaks
5 Always obeys instructions and uses own initiative. Always work overtime and is never
late for work in the mornings and after breaks. Always looks for work. Hard, fast &
smart worker.
Rating
S 4. Task Approach
Person Evaluator
1 Unstructured task approach. Work area not prepared prior to a task and / or restored
after a task. Never retrieve appropriate service literature, tools & equipment
2 Unstructured task approach. Work area not properly prepared prior to a task and / or
restored after a task. Seldom retrieve appropriate service literature, tools & equipment
and return it in satisfactory & clean condition most of the time.
3 Evidence of some structured in task approach. Work area mostly prepared prior to a
task and / or restored after a task. Mostly retrieve & return appropriate service
literature, tools, equipment in a clean & satisfactory condition.
4 Structured task approach. Work area prepared prior to a task and restored after a task.
Always retrieve and return appropriate service literature, tools, equipment in a clean &
satisfactory condition. Evidence of acceptable self-management & organizational skills
5 Very structured task approach. Work area always prepared prior to a task & restored
after a task. Always retrieve appropriate service literature, tools, equipment in a clean
& satisfactory condition. Evidence of excellent self-management & organizational skills
Rating
S 5. Safety and Housekeeping
Person Evaluator
1 Very poor housekeeping practices. Total disregard for safety. Show no responsibility
towards identifying unsafe conditions / acts & rectify / report situation.
2 Housekeeping practices below average. Seldom adhere to safety recommendation &
procedures. Show little responsibility towards identifying unsafe conditions / acts &
rectify / report situation.
3 Average housekeeping practices. Mostly adhere to safety recommendation &
procedures. Show reasonable responsibility towards identifying unsafe conditions /
acts & rectify / report situation.
4 Good housekeeping practices. Always adhere to safety recommendation &
procedures. Show good responsibility towards identifying unsafe conditions / acts &
rectify / report situation.
5 Excellent housekeeping practices. Always adhere to safety recommendation &
procedures. Show a very high responsibility towards identifying unsafe conditions /
acts & rectify / report situation.
Rating
S 6. Responsibility towards self development
Person Evaluator
1 No responsibility. Logbook / Performance evaluation never completed properly & is not
up to date. Does not take learning & training interventions serious. Does not show any
responsibility or effort to complete required skills assessments.
2 Very little responsibility. Logbook / Performance evaluation sometimes not completed
properly & are not up to date. Sometimes takes learning & training interventions
serious. Shows little responsibility & minimum effort to complete required skills
assessments.
3 Shows some responsibility. Logbook / Performance evaluation completed properly but
not always up to date. Takes learning & training interventions serious most of the time.
Shows responsibility & minimum effort to complete required skills assessments.
4 Shows responsibility. Logbook / Performance evaluation completed properly & up to
date. Takes learning & training interventions serious at all times. Shows responsibility
& effort to complete required skills assessments.
5 Highly responsible. Logbook / Performance evaluation completed properly & up to
date. Takes learning & training interventions serious at all times. Shows responsibility
& effort to complete required skills assessments. Proactive approach towards
completing learning & practical requirements of the apprenticeship (Looking / creating
opportunities)
Rating
S 7. Ability to work on his/her own
Person Evaluator
1 Cannot work alone at all. Need constant supervision & guidance even with the most
basic tasks.
2 Can work alone some times. All work is performed under supervision but quality is
sometimes questionable.
3 Can work alone most of the time. All work is performed under supervision at regular
intervals, acceptable work completion standard.
4 Can work alone all the time. All work is performed with little or no supervision and
quality of work is above average.
5 Can work alone. All work is performed with no supervision and work is of an
outstanding quality.
Person / Evaluator comment:
Weaknesses:
4. Task Approach
Overall Description:
General Comments:
Signatures
Quality Management System
Doc No. TAAL 01 Revision No: 01/12 Issue Date: 08/12 Page 5 of 6
Function: 6.2 Human Resources, 6.4 Work Environment
Barloworld Equipment Company
LEARNING CENTRE
ISO 9001:2008 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
WORKPLACE PERFORMANCE RATING
FORM: TAAL 01
Date:
(Person) (Evaluator)