Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/249320107
CITATIONS READS
5 817
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ye Cheng on 07 April 2018.
1418 The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery & Volume 24, Number 4, July 2013
Copyright © 2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery & Volume 24, Number 4, July 2013 A New Classification of the CSICA
Definition
Type 1 ‘‘O’’ shape of the ICA in the axis plane; one of DQA, DM, DQP is
3 mm smaller than both DA and DP.
Type 2 ‘‘X’’ shape of the ICA in the axis plane, one of DQA, DM, DQP is
3 mm bigger than both DA and DP.
Type 3 Parallel shape of the CSICA in the axis plane; the range of the
5 parameters is smaller than 3 mm.
Type 4 ‘‘V’’ shape of the ICA in the axis plane; DA is more than 3 mm bigger
than DP. All of DM, DQA, and DQP cannot be 1 mm bigger than DA
and 1 mm smaller than DP.
Type 5 Anti ‘‘V’’ shape of the ICA in the axis plane; DP is more than 3 mm
bigger than DA. All of DM, DQA, and DQP cannot be 1 mm bigger
than DP and 1 mm smaller than DA.
Any shape of the ICA that is not classified as any of the 5 types previously mentioned
FIGURE 2. The distance between the bilateral CSICA. D indicates the distance
is regarded as irregular type (type VI), but none of this type was found in our study.
between the bilateral CSICA.
We did some measurements to understand the shape of the in the AC segment and relatively smaller in the PC segment. Our
CSICA. For example, the distances between the bilateral CSICA results were similar to those of Wei et al5 and Xue and Jing,6 whose
were measured in 5 positions in the coronal plane (Figs. 1, 2). They results also indicated that the distance between the bilateral CSICA is
are the midpoint of the AC segment, the anterior quarter point be- smaller in the PC segment and bigger in the AC segment. The dis-
tween the AC and PC segments of the CSICA, the middle of the tance in the middle position of the CSICA (DQP, DM, and DQA) is
horizontal segment, the posterior quarter point between the AC and relatively smaller than DA and bigger than DQ, which is also
PC segments, and the midpoint of the PC segment. The 5 distances identical to the results of Xue and Jing.6 However, the SD and the
are represented by the following parameters: the distance between range of DQA, DM, and DQP are much bigger compared with those
the medial walls of the bilateral ICA measured in the AC segment of DA and DP, which means great variations existed in the value of
(DA), the distance between the medial walls of the bilateral ICA DQA, DM, and DQP. Hence, it is not suitable to describe the distance
measured in the anterior quarter point between the AC and the PC between the bilateral ICA just through the means of such values.
of ICA (DQA), the distance between the medial walls of the bilateral
ICA measured in the middle of the horizontal segment (DM), the
distance between the medial walls of the bilateral ICA measured in The Results of the Classification of the
the posterior quarter point between the AC and the PC of the ICA Horizontal Segment of the CSICA
(DQP), and the distance between the medial walls of the bilateral The 2 classifications of our study are mainly based on the
ICA measured in the PC segment (DP). Their definitions are also different shape of the horizontal segment and the PC segment of
listed in Table 1. According to the value of DA, DQA, DM, DQP, and the CSICA.
DP, we classified the horizontal segment of the CSICA into 5 types The results of the classification of the horizontal segment of
(Table 2). the CSICA are listed in Table 5. The shape of each type in the axis
The angle of the PC segment was measured in the sagittal plane is showed in Figures 4 to 7. In our study, there are 12 people
plane (Fig. 3). Considering the great variation of the angle, we who belonged to type 1 (8.2%), 37 people who belonged to type 2
classified the PC segment of the CSICA into 4 types according to the (25.3%), 58 people who belonged to type 3 (39.7%), 29 people
type of the angle (Table 3). who belonged to type 4 (19.9%), and 10 people who belonged to
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 15.0 was used type 5 (6.9%), which indicated that most people belonged to type 3
in the study for the statistical analysis. (parallel shape of the CSICA) and that a small portion of people
belonged to types 1 and 5. After analyzing the results in Table 5, we
RESULTS could find that there was indeed a great variance of the distance
between the bilateral ICA in different types especially in the middle
The Shape of the CSICA
The shape and position of the CSICA can be found and
identified easily on the CTA images. The distances between the
bilateral CSICA are listed in Table 4. The distance is relatively bigger
Parameter Definition
Copyright © 2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Wang et al The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery & Volume 24, Number 4, July 2013
TABLE 3. Standard of Classification of the Posterior Segment of the ICA TABLE 5. Types of the ICA in the Horizontal Segment
Copyright © 2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery & Volume 24, Number 4, July 2013 A New Classification of the CSICA
Copyright © 2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Wang et al The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery & Volume 24, Number 4, July 2013
View publication stats Copyright © 2013 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.