You are on page 1of 4

DOE Comments/Recommendations to Various House Bills

House Bill (HB) Provision of the HB Proposed Revision Rationale/Comments


No./Title/Author
HB03432, Rep. Presley 1 SECTION 1. Section 31
De Jesus, Sergio of the EPIRA is hereby
Dagooc amended to read as follows:

An Act Amending “Section 31. Retail Competition


Section 31 of Republic and Open Access. –
Act no, 9136, Otherwise
Known as the “Electric xxx
Generally, the DOE poses no
Power Industry Reform objection on the proposed
Act of 2001 or EPIRA”, Subsequently and every year
thereafter, the ERC shall amendments to the EPIRA,
and for Other Purposes. however, we would like to
evaluate the performance of the
market. On the basis of such reiterate that measures to
evaluation, it shall gradually protect the DUs and the
reduce the threshold level until suppliers in the migration of
it reaches the household contestable customers to RCOA
demand level. In the case of are already provided upon the
electric cooperatives, retail existing rules and policies.
competition and open access
shall be implemented not earlier
than five (5) years upon the
effectivity of this Act: Provided,
That the load requirement of
any end-user, who previously
received their supply of
electricity from a distribution
utility (DU) and
chooses to avail the
Retail Competition and Open
Access, shall be
automatically deducted from
the total load contracted by
DOE Comments/Recommendations to Various House Bills

House Bill (HB) Provision of the HB Proposed Revision Rationale/Comments


No./Title/Author
the DU in its power supply
contract with power
suppliers: Provided, further,
That the affected power
supplier of the DU shall be
given the right to match or
tender a lower offer for the
load lost.
HB 03431, Reps. Sergio General Comment
Dagooc and Presley De
Jesus The DOE defers to the wisdom
of the proponents relative to the
An Act Institutionalizing allowable System Loss
the Rules on System Recovery cap to be applied to
Loss Cap of Electric the Distribution Utilities.
Distribution Utilities,
Amending for the
Purpose Republic Act
No. 7832 and Republic
Act No. 9136
HB 02964, Rep. Joey General Comments
Sarte Salceda
The DOE poses no objection on
An Act Enhancing The the provisions of the proposed
Governance Structure Act to enhance the governance
Of The Energy structure of the Energy
Regulatory Commission Regulatory Commission (ERC).

HB 3430, Reps. Sergio SEC. 45. Cross Ownership, SEC. 45. Cross Ownership,
C. Dagooc, Presly C. Market Power Abuse and Anti- Market Power Abuse and Anti-
De Jesus Competitive Behavior. – Competitive Behavior. –
DOE Comments/Recommendations to Various House Bills

House Bill (HB) Provision of the HB Proposed Revision Rationale/Comments


No./Title/Author
An Act Amending xx xx
Section 45 of Republic
Act No. 9136, Otherwise a) No company or related group a) No company or related group The DOE would like to clarify
known as the “Electric can own, operate or control can own, operate or control more the basis of reducing the
Power Industry Reform more than thirty percent (30%) than thirty percent (30%) fifteen allowable limit of capacity
Act of 2001 or EPIRA” fifteen percent (15%) of the percent (15%) of the installed ownership per grid by
and for Other Purposes installed generating capacity of generating capacity of a grid generation companies. In this
a grid and/or twenty-five percent and/or twenty-five fifteen percent regard, it is suggested that a
(25%) of the national installed (25%) (15%) of the national thorough study be conducted in
generating capacity. “Related installed generating capacity. order to ensure that there will be
group” includes a person’s “Related group” includes a no adverse impact to the
business interests, including its person’s business interests, investments in the generation
subsidiaries, affiliates, directors including its subsidiaries, sector. Further, it is also
or officers or any of their affiliates, directors or officers or recommended for the Energy
relatives by consanguinity or any of their relatives by Regulatory Commission and
affinity, legitimate or common consanguinity or affinity, the Philippine Competition
law, within the fourth civil legitimate or common law, within Commission to be more
degree; the fourth civil degree; proactive in securing the
compliance of the industry
participants to the requirements
of the law.
HB 03601, Rep. Ralph Xxx Xxx
Wendell P. Tulfo, Rep.
Jocelyn P. Tulfo (t) Perform such other (t) Perform such other regulatory The DOE proposes to retain the
regulatory functions as are functions as are appropriate and original provision of the EPIRA
An Act Removing the appropriate and necessary in necessary in order to ensure the to allow power generation
Public Offering order to ensure the successful successful restructuring and companies to publicly list as this
Requirement of restructuring and modernization modernization of the electric will help these companies raise
Generation Companies, of the electric power industry, power industry, such as, but not substantial amounts of capital
Amending for the such as, but not limited to, the rules and and subsequent funding to fund
Purpose Section 43 (T) limited to, the rules and guidelines under which general corporate operations,
of republic Act No. guidelines under which generation companies, growth opportunities, R&D,
DOE Comments/Recommendations to Various House Bills

House Bill (HB) Provision of the HB Proposed Revision Rationale/Comments


No./Title/Author
9136, As Amended, [generation companies], distribution utilities which are not marketing, and capital
Otherwise known as the distribution utilities which are publicly listed shall offer and sell expenditures which could be
Electric power Industry not publicly listed shall offer and to the public a portion not less used for further expansion of
Reform Act of 2001” sell to the public a portion not than fifteen percent (15%) of their their power generation facilities.
less than fifteen percent (15%) common shares of stocks:
of their common shares of Provided, however, That The IPO process maybe lengthy
stocks: Provided, however, That generation companies, and time-consuming as
[generation companies,] distribution utilities or their mentioned by the proponent
distribution utilities or their respective holding companies which may take two years
respective holding companies that are already listed in the PSE before an initial public offering in
that are already listed in the are deemed in compliance. For the public market. However, an
PSE are deemed in compliance. existing companies, such public early compliance by these
For existing [companies,] offering shall be implemented not mandated entities will help to
DISTRIBUTION UTILITIES later than five (5) years from the comply the required process.  
such public offering shall be effectivity of this Act. New
implemented not later than five companies shall implement their
(5) years from the effectivity of respective public offerings not
this Act. New [companies] later than five (5) years from the
DISTRIBUTION UTILITIES issuance of their certificate of
shall implement their respective compliance; and
public offerings not later than
five (5) years from the issuance
of their certificate [of
compliance] OF PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE AND
NECESSITY; and

You might also like