Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Children with the diagnosis of Down syndrome have a chromosome disorder due to the presence of an additional copy of genes on chromosome 21. Children with Down syndrome are at risk for a number of associated health and developmental difficulties and for many years these children were considered ineducable. In the past 25 years, both the health and developmental difficulties have been the focus of extensive research effort and this work is now providing a better understanding of the childrens educational needs and potential. Advances in healthcare have resulted in a much-increased life span and most individuals with Down syndrome can now expect to live to around 60 years of age. Advances in developmental research have led to the recognition that children with Down syndrome have specific cognitive and social profiles. They do not have a global developmental delay i.e. equal delay in all areas of psychological development; rather they have a profile of strengths and weaknesses, with some areas of their development less affected than others. It is increasingly recognised that this knowledge is relevant to designing effective educational programmes, as the childrens cognitive and behavioural strengths can be used to support their learning and development, and their areas of specific weakness can be targeted for intervention (1).
Autumn 2002
Issue 28
1
community as any other child. Like all other children, children with Down syndrome will flourish when they feel loved, wanted and secure and they develop a positive sense of selfesteem. Specific needs. However, the knowledge that a child has Down syndrome alerts us to consider the extent to which the child is affected by the health and developmental difficulties that are associated with the syndrome. The health issues are considered first, as no child will be able to fully benefit from educational opportunities if he/she is affected by illness or sensory impairments.
Prevention . It is important to expect and encourage chronologically age-appropriate behaviour at all times. Difficulties often arise because the child is being babied by staff and other children in all sorts of ways, encouraging the child to behave in immature ways. Communication. It is also important to stress that behaviour may be the only way that a child with limited language can express him/herself; and if a child senses negative attitudes from staff, or if the work is too difficult or the child fears failure, difficult behaviour may be the only strategy available to him/her as a way of communicating about these experiences. In the classroom. Everyone needs to understand that behaviours are learned and that they are maintained by the responses they attract. Teachers and learning support assistants need to be confident in the use of behaviour modification techniques, with an emphasis on calm, clear behavioural modelling of what is expected of the child, and not on verbal explanation or instruction. A team approach is essential, with all those in daily contact with the child, including parents, involved in planning a behaviour change strategy and agreeing to implement it consistently. The main reasons for the failure of behaviour management plans are sabotage (someone not acting in the agreed way) and stopping the plan too soon.
Autumn 2002
Issue 28
1
MOTOR SKILLS
The development of both gross and fine motor skills is usually delayed, but again, there is wide individual variation in progress. Motor skills only improve with practice, and many children with Down syndrome develop considerable skills in sports, dance and gymnastics if given the opportunity. In the classroom. The reasons for the motor skill difficulties are not fully understood, but the advice of an occupational therapist or adviser for children with motor difficulties can be valuable in the classroom. Most children with Down syndrome can achieve legible handwriting if given appropriate help, and many are skilled at using the computer to learn and to record work in primary years and later. The children are usually small in stature and therefore appropriately sized seating is important. Expression lags behind comprehension. Language production skills are more delayed than language comprehension, so most children with Down syndrome understand more than they can say. Speech intelligibility is also a problem. This is a frustrating situation and can lead to the childrens understanding being underestimated. Causes hearing, working memory and speech motor difficulties. The reasons for the speech and language difficulties in children with Down syndrome are not fully understood. Hearing difficulties in the pre-school years and later may be implicated. Auditory short-term (working) memory difficulties are being increasingly identified as a major factor influencing the learning of vocabulary and grammar (see below) (3). The speech motor difficulties that manifest as difficulties with articulation and phonology may reflect the general motor skill difficulties associated with Down syndrome, but there are also suspected difficulties at the level of word finding and sentence formulation. In the classroom. Speech and language development should be a curriculum priority. All children with Down syndrome should receive the support of a speech and language therapist throughout their school career, and the therapist should be able to identify how speech and language targets can be embedded in the regular curriculum activities. Vocabulary and grammar will be developed across the curriculum, particularly through reading and writing activities. Work on phonology and intelligibility can be linked to phonics and spelling work. Inclusion. In a recent study, inclusive education showed significant benefits for the speech and language development of teenagers with Down syndrome: they were more than two years ahead of peers in special education on a measure of expressive language, probably as a result of daily access to literacy activities and to the wider curriculum, as well as the effect of being immersed in a typical language community (2).
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT
Most children with Down syndrome will be cognitively delayed and fall within the range of mild to moderate learning difficulty. Some 10 per cent have more severe cognitive impairments, often accompanied by additional medical problems, and will have severe or even profound and multiple learning difficulties. There is wide variation in cognitive development and therefore in academic progress among children with Down syndrome. It is helpful to consider separately the skills that contribute to cognitive development.
Autumn 2002
Issue 28
1
WORKING MEMORY
Effects on all learning. The working memory system is an immediate memory system and it supports all conscious activity and mental processing. It is considered to play an important role in language learning in all children. Impairment in this system will affect any childs ability to follow spoken instruction in the classroom, to read with comprehension and to do mental arithmetic, for example, and it has been shown to affect academic progress in typically developing children. Specific difficulty. Children with Down syndrome have a specific deficit in the auditory component of the working memory system (4) and this could explain many of the speech, language and learning difficulties experienced by children with Down syndrome (3). In the classroom. The limited working memory skills of children with Down syndrome will affect all aspects of learning in the classroom. There is some evidence that memory training activities can improve memory skills but teaching strategies in all areas of the curriculum should take account of this weakness and support all learning with visually presented information (see (2)). Visual processing and visual memory skills are areas of relative strength for children with Down syndrome, and can be used to overcome their auditory processing and auditory memory weaknesses. Inclusion. Inclusive education seems to provide a more effective literacy teaching environment for pupils with Down syndrome as teenagers in inclusion were more than three years ahead of peers in special education on a literacy measure (2).
Autumn 2002
Issue 28
1
used (e.g. the LSA takes turns at the task, modelling the correct steps, or prompts success by helping the child to complete the task). The emotional atmosphere should be positive, making learning fun and successful for the child at all times and slowly withdrawing prompts as the child is able to complete more steps successfully without help. Too much classroom teaching is testing, not teaching. In the authors experience, it is easier to meet effectively the specific needs of children with Down syndrome in inclusive rather than special classrooms as their speech, language, literacy and learning needs can be met by daily differentiated access to the National Curriculum. The role models provided by peers are beneficial, and the pace of learning provided is greater than that in a special education classroom. The majority of mainstream schools that the authors have worked with are positive about inclusion and have worked hard to make the placement a success, with recognised benefits for the rest of the pupils.
References
1 FREEMAN, S. F. N. and HODAPP, R. M. (2000). Educating children with Down syndrome: linking behavioural characteristics to promising intervention strategies, Down Syndrome Quarterly, 5(1), 19. BUCKLEY, S. and BIRD, G. (2000). Education for Children with Down Syndrome an Overview. Portsmouth: The Down Syndrome Educational Trust. CHAPMAN, R. S. and HESKETH, L. (2001). Language, cognition and short-term memory in individuals with Down syndrome, Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 7(1), 18. JARROLD, C. and BADDELEY, A. D. (2001). Shortterm memory in Down syndrome: applying the working memory model, Down Syndrome Research and Practice , 7(1), 1724. CUNNINGHAM, C. C., GLENN, S., LORENZ, S., CUCKLE, P. and SHEPPERDSON, B. (1998). Trends and outcomes in educational placements for children with Down syndrome, European Journal of Special Needs Education, 13(3), 225237.
1. School attitude. The first key is attitude. Ideally, the whole-school staff needs to be positive, believe that the child should be educated in their school and welcome the child as a full member of the school community. This may require a training session to deal with staff misconceptions and anxieties before the child starts at the school. 2. In-school support . The second key is appropriate provision of learning support assistant time and planning time for the SENCO, teacher and LSA to work together as a team in order to deliver the curriculum and ensure the social inclusion of the child. 3. Differentiation. The third key is the ability to differentiate the curriculum appropriately for the child. 4. Specialist advice. The fourth key is access to a specialist adviser from the LEA who is experienced in the inclusion of children with Down syndrome. 5. Partnership with parents. The fifth key is a good working partnership between parents and school, based on mutual respect.
Weblink
Down Syndrome Issues and Information: Development and Education Series. Over the past two years, Sue Buckley and Gillian Bird, with other education colleagues, have written a comprehensive series of books which provide teachers and assistants in pre-school, primary and secondary schools with evidence-based, practical information covering reading, number, speech and language, memory, social development and behaviour and accessing the curriculum. Information on this series is available at: http://www.downsed.org
Copying Permitted
The NFER grants to educational institutions and interested bodies permission to reproduce this item in the interests of wider dissemination.
Autumn 2002
Issue 28