Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/289000075
CITATION READS
1 865
5 authors, including:
Venkataramana Runkana
Tata Consultancy Services Limited
66 PUBLICATIONS 739 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Venkataramana Runkana on 17 October 2020.
ABSTRACT
India is the largest producer of sponge iron or direct reduced iron (DRI) in the world. The important
step in the manufacture of DRI is direct reduction of iron ore by coal or reducing gases such as
carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Majority of the Indian plants utilise locally available coal, which is
relatively poor in quality. The carbon content of coal is low which necessitates high coal consumption.
The undesirable ash content is also high which leads to frequent shut-downs due to deposition of
ash inside the kiln. Hence, there is a need to optimise DRI production in order to enhance kiln
productivity and energy efficiency and to minimise release of greenhouse gases. Development
of a comprehensive mathematical model for direct reduction of iron ore by a mixture of coals is
presented here. Important physico-chemical phenomena such as heat transfer between solids, gases
and kiln wall, pre-heating and drying of particles, devolatilisation and gasification of coal, reduction
of hematite, magnetite and wustite by carbon monoxide and hydrogen, and flow of particles inside
the kiln are incorporated into the model. Ore and coal properties such as particle size distribution
and chemical analyses along with kiln geometry are taken as inputs. The model predicts gas and
solid temperature and concentration profiles along kiln length as well as total Fe content of DRI,
fixed carbon content of char and waste gas volume and its composition. The predicted gas and solid
temperature profiles at different locations along kiln length are reasonably close to the data from an
industrial kiln. The model can be utilised to predict the rate of release of greenhouse gases such as
carbon dioxide which can then be employed to design post-combustion furnaces appropriately so
that ultimate greenhouse gas emissions from the DRI plant can be minimised.
Keywords: direct reduced iron, coal, rotary kiln, modelling, optimisation
INTRODUCTION
India is the largest producer of sponge iron or direct reduced iron (DRI) in the world. DRI is
manufactured through either the gas- or the coal-based technologies and is used as the raw material
for making steel through the electric arc furnace (EAF)-route. Iron ore fines/lumps are reduced in
solid state at 950 - 1050 °C either by reducing gas (carbon monoxide and hydrogen) or by coal.
Majority of the sponge iron plants in India produce DRI using iron ore fines and non-coking coal
in a rotary kiln. Tata Sponge Iron Limited (TSIL) operates three large industrial rotary kilns for
producing DRI through the TISCO direct reduction (TDR) process (Chatterjee et al, 1978). The
critical step in this process is the reduction of iron ore by coal in the rotary kiln. In coal-based sponge
iron rotary kilns, iron ore, coal and dolomite are fed to the kiln as separate streams at a controlled
rate. Dolomite is added in small quantities to control sulphur content of DRI. The kiln is a refractory
lined steel cylinder in which direct reduction takes place in a counter-current fashion with iron ore,
dolomite and coal charged from the feed end of the kiln while air enters from the discharge end.
Coal is also injected pneumatically through a blower from the discharge end in order to provide the
1. Principal Scientist, Tata Research Development and Design Centre, A Division of Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, 54-B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Pune 411013, India.
Email: venkat.runkana@tcs.com
2. Systems Engineer, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, 54-B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Pune 411013, India. Email: pradeep.natekar@cummins.com
3. Business Development-Lead, Tata Research Development and Design Centre, A Division of Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, 54-B, Hadapsar Industrial Estate, Pune 411013, India.
Email: viswanadh.bandla@tcs.com
4. Manager – Process Control, Tata Sponge Iron Ltd, Joda, Orissa 758 034, India. Email: gpothal@tatasponge.com
5. Advisor to the Managing Director, Tata Steel, Jamshedpur 831001, India. Email: amit.chatterjee@tatasteel.com
XXV INTERNATIONAL MINERAL PROCESSING CONGRESS (IMPC) 2010 PROCEEDINGS / BRISBANE, QLD, AUSTRALIA / 6 - 10 SEPTEMBER 2010 3383
V RUNKANA et al
reducing agent after coal from the feed end is consumed during the reduction process. Coal charged
from the feed end is referred to as feed coal while coal injected from the discharged end is referred
to as injection coal. In a sponge iron rotary kiln, coal acts as the reducing agent as well as the source
of energy. Heat is supplied by convection and radiation to the solid charge from hot freeboard gas
flowing counter-currently as well as through regenerative wall. Air is also introduced along the length
of the kiln (at various locations through the secondary air blowers) in order to improve mixing. Air
entering from the discharge end is referred to as the primary air while that entering axially along the
kiln length is referred to as the secondary air. The kiln can be seen as having three distinct zones,
first the drying zone where the moisture in solids gets evaporated, second the pre-heating zone and
third the reduction zone. The reduced material (DRI) is discharged to a rotary cooler from where it
is dispatched to different magnetic separators to split the magnetic (DRI) component from the non-
magnetic components (char and ash) in the kiln output.
One of the critical problems faced by the coal-based sponge iron industries in India is accretion
inside rotary kilns. Accretion occurs due to deposition of low melting complexes consisting of ash,
gangue and metallic iron. The thickness of the deposited layer increases as time progresses and
ultimately leads to choking of the kiln. The kiln needs to be shut down and the deposited material
has to be removed mechanically. This results in frequent kiln shut-downs, reduced plant availability
and low production rates. Accretion affects not only the kiln throughput but also the coal utilization
and thermal efficiency of the kiln because it reduces the effective kiln volume and the efficiency of
heat transfer between the kiln surface, the free-board gases and the solids. Thermocouples installed
along the kiln length for process control do not provide accurate measurements of the temperatures
inside, except during the initial stages of a campaign. The inaccuracy in temperature measurement
is primarily due to coating of thermocouples with ash or gangue or metallic iron. While accretion
cannot be avoided completely, it may be possible to reduce the rate of accretion by manipulating the
process variables such as flow rates of iron ore, feed and injection coals, primary and secondary air
flow rates, and the kiln rotational speed.
A phenomenological model for direct reduction of iron ore by coal in the rotary kiln will be an
invaluable tool as it would then be possible to predict not only the gas and solid temperature profiles
inside the kiln but also the degree of metallization of the DRI, waste gas flow rate and its composition.
These predicted variables could be utilized, along with on-line process measurements and off-line
laboratory analyses, for more efficient plant optimization and control. Moreover, the mathematical
model would be useful to obtain information about internal gas and solid temperature profiles,
even when thermocouples installed on-line do not provide accurate measurements due to accretion.
A number of models were proposed in the literature for direct reduction of iron ore by coal in a
rotary kiln (Venkateswaran and Brimacombe, 1977; Mukhopadhyay, Sathe and Chatterjee, 1984;
Ramakrishnan and Sai, 1999). Although these models were useful in understanding the effect of
important process variables on the iron ore direct reduction process, they were not comprehensive in
nature, especially with respect to incorporating various physico-chemical phenomena involved in the
process. None of them include the well established step-wise reduction of hematite to magnetite to
wustite to metallic iron by carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Similarly, kinetics of drying of moisture
from iron ore and coal, and devolatilization of coal were also not dealt in detail. Moreover, none of
the models were validated with data from an industrial coal-based sponge iron rotary kiln process.
We have developed a fairly comprehensive mathematical model for the direct reduction of iron ore
by coal in a rotary kiln, validated the model with data from one of the industrial kilns at TSIL and
utilized it for process analysis, optimization and control (Runkana et al, 2007). The mathematical
model and its validation with data from the industrial kiln are described here.
MATHEMATICAL MODEL
In the TISCO Direct Reduction (TDR) process, iron ore, coal and dolomite particles are charged from
the feed end, without any pre-mixing, while only coal is injected from the discharge end of the kiln.
The kiln is usually inclined at an angle to the horizontal and the movement of solids depends on the
speed of rotation and the angle of inclination of the kiln as well as on the properties of particles and
the particulate bed inside the kiln. The solids enter at the ambient temperature and encounter hot
gases, flowing in a counter-current fashion, as they move from the feed end towards the discharge
end. Due to mixing, heat transfer takes place between the two phases and the temperature of the
XXV INTERNATIONAL MINERAL PROCESSING CONGRESS (IMPC) 2010 PROCEEDINGS / BRISBANE, QLD, AUSTRALIA / 6 - 10 SEPTEMBER 2010 3384
MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION OF DIRECT REDUCTION OF IRON ORE BY COAL IN A ROTARY KILN
solids increases gradually due to convection, conduction and radiation. During the initial stages,
moisture present in coal and iron ore particles evaporates. As the solids attain higher temperatures,
devolatilization of coal takes place resulting in the formation of char and release of tar and light gases
such as carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen (H2), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), water (H2O),
etc. The coal gasification reactions, mentioned below, occur at higher temperatures and lead to the
formation of CO and H2.
The iron ore utilized at TSIL primarily consists of hematite (Fe2O3) and minor constituents of gangue
materials such as silica (SiO2), alumina (Al2O3), calcium oxide (CaO), sulphur (S) and phosphorous
(P). The reduction of hematite is assumed to take place in three steps, according to the following
reactions:
Conversion of hematite to magnetite (Fe3O4) by CO and H2:
The mathematical model developed in the current work is one-dimensional in nature and is based on
the fundamental principles of heat transfer between solids, gases and the kiln wall and mass transfer
between solids and gases. It is meant for steady-state simulation of direct reduction of iron ore. The
overall kiln model includes appropriate sub-models for kinetics of reactions involving hematite,
magnetite, wustite, carbon, oxygen, carbon monoxide and hydrogen, and the flow of solids inside the
kiln (see Figure 1). In order to predict gas and solid phase temperature and concentration profiles along
the kiln length, the rotary kiln is divided into a number of slices or computational elements over which
FIG 1 - Structure of the model for direct reduction of iron ore by coal in a rotary kiln.
XXV INTERNATIONAL MINERAL PROCESSING CONGRESS (IMPC) 2010 PROCEEDINGS / BRISBANE, QLD, AUSTRALIA / 6 - 10 SEPTEMBER 2010 3385
V RUNKANA et al
material and energy balances for the gas and the solid phases and mass balances for the individual
species are written. The mathematical model consists of a set of ordinary differential equations, which
includes overall material and energy balances for the gas and the solid phases, material balances for
individual species in each phase and the height of the solids bed along the kiln length.
dTg GSATSACpAir
GgCpg = – Qrgw – Qrgh – Qcgw – Qcgb + + ∑ viRiΔHi (9)
dz ΔZ i
dTb
Qrgw = + Qrgb + Qcgb + Qcwb + Qrwb – RWΔHW + ∑ vjRjΔHj (10)
dz j
where Qrgw is the rate of heat transfer by radiation between gases and the kiln wall, Qrgb is the rate
of heat transfer by radiation between gases and solids, Qcgw is the rate of heat transfer by convection
between gases and the kiln wall, Qcgb is the rate of heat transfer by convection between gases and
solids, Qcwb is the rate of heat transfer by conduction between the kiln wall and solids, Qrwb is the rate
of heat transfer by radiation between the kiln wall and solids, Gg and Gs are molar flow rates of gases
and solids, respectively, Cpg and Cps are specific heat capacities of gases and solids, respectively, Tg
and Tb are temperatures of gases and solids, respectively, νi and νj are stoichiometric coefficients,
and z is the differential kiln length. The fifth term on the right hand side of Eq. (9) represents the
enthalpy of secondary air at any location along the kiln length. GSA is molar flow rate of secondary air
and CpAir is specific heat capacity of air at its temperature TSA. The last terms in Eq. (9] and Eq. (10)
represent, respectively, the net heat released/consumed due to chemical reactions in the gas phase
and in the solid phase. These terms include enthalpy of all the iron ore reduction reactions, carbon
gasification reactions and combustion of carbon with oxygen. RW∆HW is the net heat consumed due to
evaporation of moisture in solids. The equations for computing various heat fluxes are incorporated
in the model but are not described here due to space limitations.
dGg GSA
= ± ∑ vi RiG (11)
dz Δz i
XXV INTERNATIONAL MINERAL PROCESSING CONGRESS (IMPC) 2010 PROCEEDINGS / BRISBANE, QLD, AUSTRALIA / 6 - 10 SEPTEMBER 2010 3386
MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION OF DIRECT REDUCTION OF IRON ORE BY COAL IN A ROTARY KILN
where GSA is molar flow rate of secondary air, ∆z is length of the infinitesimal discrete kiln element
used for computations, RiG is the rate of generation/consumption of gases due to reaction or phase
change process i in gaseous phase, νi is the stoichiometric coefficient of ith reaction. GSA is set equal
to zero at every location except where secondary air is injected. The above equation can be suitably
modified at the discharge end to include flow rates of primary air and roots blower air. Similar to the
gas phase, the net amount of solids passing through the kiln will change due to coal devolatilization
and gasification, evaporation of moisture and reduction of various phases in the iron ore. The overall
material balance for the solid phase is given by:
dGg GIC S
= ± ∑ vj Rj (12)
dz Δz j
where GIC is molar flow rate of the total injected coal components, that is, fixed carbon, volatile
matter (CO2, CO, H2O, CH4, H2, tar in the present model) and free water (unbound moisture of coal).
RSj is rate of generation/consumption of solids due to reaction or phase change process j in the solid
phase. The above equation is modified suitably at the feed end to include input of iron ore, dolomite
and coal. GIC at different locations is calculated using the data obtained by conducting coal injection
measurements under cold conditions. This data is used to compute the distribution of coal along the
kiln length (as a percentage of the total injection coal flow rate) as well as the size distribution of coal
falling at a particular location.
The iron ore consists of hematite and gangue material while coal contains fixed carbon, volatile
matter and ash. Dolomite is treated as an inert in the present work. Based on the literature reports
(Solomon, Fletcher and Pugmire, 1993; Sun and Lu, 1999; Donskoi and McElwain, 2003a and b),
the volatile matter in coal is assumed to consist of tar, methane, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide,
hydrogen and chemically-bound water. Devolatilization of coal results in liberation of these species.
During coal pyrolysis, phase transformation of tar appears to occur from solid to liquid and then
combustion of liquid tar to either carbon or hydrocarbons. Tar is treated as two components in the
present model, tar-solid and tar-liquid and the solid phase is assumed to consist of a total of 13 species
or components, namely, Fe2O3, Fe3O4, FeO, Fe (metallic), carbon, tar-solid, tar-liquid, methane,
carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen, free moisture and chemically-bound moisture. The
concentrations of these species change along the kiln length, depending on the rates of reactions
involving them. The concentration of hematite in the solids, xH depends on the rate of reduction by
CO and H2:
dxH
Vsolids = –3(RH–CO + RH–H2) (13)
dz
where Vsolids is volumetric flow rate of solids, RH-CO and RH-H2 are rates of reduction of hematite by CO
and H2, respectively. Similarly, the material balances for other individual species in the solid phase
are written and incorporated in the model.
The gas phase is assumed to consist of a total of 7 species, namely, nitrogen, oxygen, moisture, carbon
dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen and methane. The concentration of carbon monoxide, yCO varies
due to its formation by the Boudouard and the water gas reactions, generation by devolatilization of
coal and consumption due to reduction of mineral phases.
dyCO
Vgas = 2RB + RWG – RH–CO – RM–CO – RFeO–CO + RCO–VM (14)
dz
where Vgas is volumetric flow rate of gases, RB and RWG are rates of Boudouard and water-gas reactions,
respectively, RM-CO and RFeO-CO are rates of reduction of magnetite and wustite, respectively, by CO.
RCO-VM is rate of release of CO from the volatile matter present in coal. Similar material balance
equations are written for other species and incorporated in the model.
The general rate expression for reduction of various mineral phases by CO or H2 is given by:
R = 4π rore
2
φ –1
ore nore ( )
A K*ya yb
Vsolids A B (15)
XXV INTERNATIONAL MINERAL PROCESSING CONGRESS (IMPC) 2010 PROCEEDINGS / BRISBANE, QLD, AUSTRALIA / 6 - 10 SEPTEMBER 2010 3387
V RUNKANA et al
where rore and φore are radius and shape factor of ore particles, respectively, A is area of cross-section
of bed and Vsolids is solids volumetric flow rate. nore is number of iron ore particles in a unit cross
section of the bed calculated as volume of ore divided by volume of single ore particle, yA and yB are
concentration of reactants A and B, respectively, and K* is the overall reaction rate constant given by
(Levenspiel, 1972):
1 (16)
K* =
1 rore 3
+ +
km 2De kp
where De is effective diffusion coefficient of the reacting gas through the product layer in the iron
ore particle. The mass transfer coefficient, km is calculated using a correlation between Sherwood
number, NSh, Reynolds number, NRe and Schmidt number, NSc (McCabe, Smith and Harriott, 1985):
where DAB is the diffusion coefficient of species A through gas B. Depending on the gas involved in the
reaction, that is, either CO or H2, its diffusion coefficient through the gas phase is used in the above
equation.
Coal devolatilization is assumed to occur as a first order rate process. The general rate expression
for devolatilization kinetics is given by:
R = 4π rcoal
2
φ –1
coal ncoal ( )A k x , i = tar-solid, CH , CO, CO , H , H O
Vsolids i i 4 2 2 2 (18)
where xi is concentration of component i in coal and ncoal is the number of coal particles in unit
cross-section of bed calculated as volume of coal divided by volume of a single coal particle. Coal
gasification occurs via Boudouard and water-gas reactions. The rate expressions for these reactions
are similar to those used for reduction reactions.
The particles of iron ore, coal and dolomite contain moisture (free-water). During pre-heating of
the solid charge inside the kiln, moisture evaporates from these particles. The moisture content of
iron ore is relatively low (1.8-2.5 per cent wt) as compared to that of coal (7.5-12.5 per cent wt).
The drying of solids is assumed to be a first-order rate process and the rate of drying is given by the
following equation:
RFW = 4π rcoal
2
φ –1
coal ncoal ( ) A k x
Vsolids FW FW
(19)
where xFW is concentration of free-water in the solids and kFW is drying rate constant, given by an
Arrhenius-type expression (Patisson et al, 2000a and b):
[ [ ]]
2 –3/2
dH(z) tan θ 12Qv tan β 4H(z) 2H(z)
= – 3 3
– 3
(21)
dz cos β ωD i D i D
i
where Qv is volumetric flow rate of solids, H is bed height, z is the distance from feed end along the
length of the kiln, θ is kiln inclination angle with the horizontal, β is dynamic angle of repose of
solids, Di is internal diameter of the kiln and ω is kiln rotation speed. The above ordinary differential
XXV INTERNATIONAL MINERAL PROCESSING CONGRESS (IMPC) 2010 PROCEEDINGS / BRISBANE, QLD, AUSTRALIA / 6 - 10 SEPTEMBER 2010 3388
MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION OF DIRECT REDUCTION OF IRON ORE BY COAL IN A ROTARY KILN
equation is integrated numerically from the kiln discharge end up to the feed end to calculate the
axial bed height profile, applying dam height at the discharge end as the boundary condition. The
axial velocity and the mean residence time of solids are then calculated using the bed height profile.
60
Predicted Solids Hold-up, kg
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Measured Solids Hold-up, kg
FIG 2 - Comparison of solids hold-up calculated using the solids bed height model with the experimental data of Chatterjee et al (1983).
Angle of inclination of kiln: 2.50, exit dam height (15-30 mm) and kiln rotational speed (0.3-0.7, rpm).
XXV INTERNATIONAL MINERAL PROCESSING CONGRESS (IMPC) 2010 PROCEEDINGS / BRISBANE, QLD, AUSTRALIA / 6 - 10 SEPTEMBER 2010 3389
V RUNKANA et al
reduction of iron ore by coal and heat transfer in rotary kilns, representative values of these parameters
are taken and included in the model. The correlations for specific heats of iron oxides, metallic
iron, and carbon, CO, CO2, H2 and H2O are taken from Donskoi and McElwain (2003a and b). The
correlations for specific heats of other gaseous components, namely, N2, O2, Air and CH4 are taken
from Perry’s Chemical Engineers Handbook (1997). The correlations for temperature-dependent
heats of reduction reactions and the coal gasification reactions are also taken from Donskoi and
McElwain (2003a and b). Similarly, correlations for temperature-dependent thermal conductivities
of gas and solid phase species are also presented by Donskoi and McElwain (2003a and b) and used
in the present work. The emissivities of solids and refractory wall are taken from Venkateswaran and
Brimacombe (1977) and the emissivity of shell is taken from Mukhopadhyay, Sathe and Chatterjee
(1984). The emissivity of solids, refractory wall and the shell are assumed to be constant and taken
as 1.0, 0.9 and 0.56, respectively. The emissivity of gases is calculated using the equation proposed
by Rovaglio, Manca and Biardi (1998) who fitted the data reported by Hottel and Sarofim (1968). The
coal devolatilization rate constants are taken from Solomon and Colket (1978). The rate constants for
drying of solids are taken from Patisson et al (2000a and b). The predicted gas and solid temperature
profiles are compared with measured data in Figures 3-4. The plant data correspond to an iron ore
flow rate of 22.2 tph and kiln speed of 0.46 rpm. Numerical values of other process parameters
used for simulation are provided in Table 1. It can be noticed from Figures 3 and 4 that the model
1200
1000
Gas Temperature, K
800
600
400
FIG 3 - Comparison of predicted kiln internal gas temperature profile with measured profile at an iron ore flow rate of 22.2 tph and kiln speed of 0.46 rpm.
1200
1000
Bed Temperature, K
800
600
400
FIG 4 - Comparison of predicted kiln internal bed temperature profile with measured profile at an iron ore flow rate of 22.2 tph and kiln speed of 0.46 rpm.
XXV INTERNATIONAL MINERAL PROCESSING CONGRESS (IMPC) 2010 PROCEEDINGS / BRISBANE, QLD, AUSTRALIA / 6 - 10 SEPTEMBER 2010 3390
MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION OF DIRECT REDUCTION OF IRON ORE BY COAL IN A ROTARY KILN
TABLE 1
Inputs to the model (plant data) for the results shown in Figures 3 and 4.
predictions are reasonably close the plant data. The model is tested extensively with additional plant
data for further validation.
The model predictions are also checked against shell temperatures of the kiln at TSIL. The predicted
and measured kiln shell temperatures for a set of typical operating conditions are shown in Figure 5.
It can be noticed from Figure 5 that the shell temperatures are higher in the preheating zone than in
the reduction zone. Typically, shell temperature should be lower in the preheating zone than in the
reduction zone because gas and solid temperatures inside the kiln are much higher in the reduction
zone. However, the current shell temperature data indicate otherwise. This indirectly shows that
gases and solids are losing more heat in the preheating zone than in the reduction zone. This appears
to be the reason for the discrepancies in the gas and the solid temperatures in the preheating zone
in Figures 3 and 4. In the present model, uniform wall thickness and properties are assumed along
kiln length. However, due to wear and tear during removal of kiln accretions and due to exposure to
high temperature gases over a period of time, the wall properties might have changed, causing these
higher heat losses in the preheating zone. Although the results are not presented here, since step-wise
Shell Temperature, deg C
400
350
300
250
200 Predicted
Measured
150
0 12 24 36 48 60 72
Kiln Length, m
FIG 5 - Comparison of predicted and measured shell temperatures in the rotary kiln at TSIL for typical operating conditions.
XXV INTERNATIONAL MINERAL PROCESSING CONGRESS (IMPC) 2010 PROCEEDINGS / BRISBANE, QLD, AUSTRALIA / 6 - 10 SEPTEMBER 2010 3391
V RUNKANA et al
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank the managements of Tata Sponge Iron Ltd. (TSIL), Joda and Tata Research
Development and Design Centre (TRDDC), Pune for the permission to publish this article. Excellent
cooperation provided by plant engineers and operators at TSIL is gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
Chatterjee, A, Pandey, B D, Ojha, C C, Tiwary, M, Poddar, M N and Chakravarty, P K, 1978. The development
of the TISCO technology for sponge iron production in rotary kilns, SEAISI Quarterly, 7: 64-70.
Chatterjee, A, Sathe, A V, Srivastava, M P and Mukhopadhyay, P K, 1983. Flow of materials in rotary kilns
used for sponge iron manufacture: Part I. Effect of some operational variables. Metallurgical Transactions
B, 14B: 375-381.
Constantinides, A, 1987. Applied Numerical Methods with Computers (McGraw Hill: New York).
Donskoi, E and McElwain, D L S, 2003a. Estimation and modeling of parameters for direct reduction in
iron ore/coal composites: Part I. Physical parameters, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 34B:
93-102.
Donskoi, E and McElwain, D L S, 2003b. Estimation and modeling of parameters for direct reduction in
iron ore/coal composites: Part II. Kinetic parameters, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 34B:
255-266.
XXV INTERNATIONAL MINERAL PROCESSING CONGRESS (IMPC) 2010 PROCEEDINGS / BRISBANE, QLD, AUSTRALIA / 6 - 10 SEPTEMBER 2010 3392
MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION OF DIRECT REDUCTION OF IRON ORE BY COAL IN A ROTARY KILN
Hottel, H C and Sarofim, A F, 1968. Radiative Heat Transfer (McGraw-Hill: New York).
Kramers, H and Croockewit, P, 1952. The passage of granular solids through inclined rotary kilns, Chemical
Engineering Science, 1: 259-265.
Levenspiel, O, 1972. Chemical Reaction Engineering (Wiley Eastern Ltd.: New Delhi).
McCabe, W L, Smith, J C and Harriott, P, 1985. Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering (McGraw Hill,
New York).
Mukhopadhyay, P K, Sathe, A V and Chatterjee, A, 1984. A mathematical model of direct reduction of iron
oxides in rotary kilns using TDR process, Transactions of Indian Institute of Metals, 37: 721-728.
Patisson, F, Lebas, E, Hanrot, F, Ablitzer, D and Houzelot, J-L, 2000a. Coal pyrolysis in a rotary kiln: Part I.
Model of the pyrolysis of a single grain, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 31B: 381-390.
Patisson, F, Lebas, E, Hanrot, F, Ablitzer, D and Houzelot, J-L, 2000b. Coal pyrolysis in a rotary kiln: Part II.
Overall model of the furnace, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 31B: 391-402.
Perry, H, 1997. Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ handbook (McGraw Hill: New York).
Ramakrishnan, V and Sai, P S T, 1999. Mathematical modeling of pneumatic char injection in a direct
reduction rotary kiln, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 30B: 969-977.
Rovaglio, M, Manca, D and Biardi, G, 1998. Dynamic modeling of waste incineration plants with rotary kilns:
Comparisons between experimental and simulation data, Chemical Engineering Science, 53: 2727-2742.
Runkana, V, Natekar, P V, Bandla, V, Pothal, G, Rath, S K, Jena, S and Ninan, T P, 2007. Field of process
control equipment, Indian Patent Application No: 2235/MUM/2007.
Solomon, P R and Colket, M B, 1978. 17th Symposium (International) on Combustion, pp 131-143 (The
Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA).
Solomon, P R, Fletcher, T H and Pugmire, R J, 1993. Progress in coal pyrolysis, Fuel, 72: 587-597
Sun, S and Lu, W K, 1999. Building of a mathematical for the reduction of iron ore in ore/coal composites,
ISIJ International, 39: 130-138.
Venkateswaran, V and Brimacombe, J K, 1977. Mathematical model of the SL/RN direct reduction process,
Metallurgical Transactions B, 8B: 389-398.
XXV INTERNATIONAL MINERAL PROCESSING CONGRESS (IMPC) 2010 PROCEEDINGS / BRISBANE, QLD, AUSTRALIA / 6 - 10 SEPTEMBER 2010 3393