TUGAS MODUL 4

Pengumpulan Data Lapangan (1)

SI-5151 Produktivitas Konstruksi 
 
Dosen: 
Ir. Muhamad Abduh M.T., Ph.D  
Budi Hasiholan S.T. M.Eng., Ph.D 
 
 
 

 
Disusun Oleh: 

Dhean Dwi Lestari

25022020

MANAJEMEN REKAYASA KONSTRUKSI

PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER TEKNIK SIPIL
FAKULTAS TEKNIK SIPIL DAN LINGKUNGAN
INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG
2022
Wati and Budi use two different methods of work sampling to study a crew. Wati takes some
400 samples over a period of 30 minutes by instantly spotting workers and classifying their
activities into “effective”, “contributory”, or “ineffective”. She calls 150 samples “effective”, 120
“contributory”, and 130 “ineffective”. Simultaneously, Budi uses the 5- minute ratings
technique, observing workers for 30-second intervals. He claims 40% of his samples as
“working” and 60% as “delay”
1. Assuming Wati wanted at least a 95% confidence limit, what is her approximate limit of error?
2. What LUF would result from Wati’s observation?
3. What LUF would result from Budi’s observation?
4. By comparing Budi’s LUF to Wati’s, how did Budi tend to classify work that Wati called
“contributory”?

Jawab
1. Menggunakan Nomograph dengan menarik garis untuk mengetahui hubungan antara
confidence level dan sample size atau number of observation. Sebelumnya harus ditentukan nilai
confidence level yang dipilih berapa category propositions yang diinginkan.

Berdasarkan hasil Nomograph di atas, didapatkan hasil margin of error sebesar 3%

2. Effective time = 150 / 400 = 37.5%
Contrybutory time = 120 / 400 = 32.5%
Innefective time = 130 / 400 = 30.0%
Observing = 30-second intervals
Weighting factor = 0.5
Labor Percent Time (min)
Effective Time 150 37.5% 11.25
Contrybutory Time 130 32.5% 9.75
Ineffective 120 30.0% 9
Sum 400 100% 30

EffectiveTime +( weighting factor x contributory time)

LUF =
Total time
11.25+(0.5 x 9)
=
30

= 0.525

Maka nilai LUF untuk hasil perhitungan Wati yaitu 0.525

3. Working = 40% x 400 = 160

Delay = 60% x 400 = 240
Observing = 30-second intervals
Labor Percent Time (min)
Working 160 40.0% 12
Delay 240 60.0% 18
Sum 400 100% 30

EffectiveTime +( weighting factor x contributory time)

LUF =
Total time
12+(0.5 x 0)
=
30

= 0.4

Maka nilai LUF untuk hasil perhitungan Budi yaitu 0.4

4. Berdasarkan perhitungan, Budi cenderung mengklasifikasikan pekerjaan contributory pada

Ineffective work yang dapat mengakibatkan delay. Hal ini dapat terlihat dari perhitungan LUF
Budi lebih kecil dari perhitungan LUF Wati.