Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract. A compact microring resonator (MRR) and its implementation for polarization rota-
tion-based all-optical switching are proposed. The polarization rotation has been achieved by
enhancing geometry-induced birefringence of the device and with the insertion of polarization
rotator in the race-track-shaped MRR. The proposed device has been modeled using Jones
matrix and the finite-difference time-domain simulation method. The insertion loss and the
extinction ratio have been found to be −0.13 and 19.39 dB, respectively. © 2021 Society of
Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) [DOI: 10.1117/1.OE.60.8.085109]
Keywords: microring resonator; optical switching; polarization; polarization rotation; finite-
difference time-domain simulation; polarization switch.
Paper 20210297 received Mar. 18, 2021; accepted for publication Aug. 10, 2021; published
online Aug. 20, 2021.
1 Introduction
The research on polarization rotation and conversion-based switches is rapidly increasing due to
the growing demand for the various polarization-diversity circuits.1–3 Polarization manipulation
is vital in telecommunication systems and modern data-centers, where the optical communica-
tion is playing a significant role in distributing high bandwidth message connectivity among the
various users. The phase, amplitude, polarization, and wavelength can be exploited to increase
the data-carrying capacity in optical communication systems. The mode/polarization division
multiplexing offers a new dimension of research in the area of wavelength division multiplexing
scheme, having the range of petabits/s of data transfer.2,3 Polarization is one of the properties of
light, and many devices in photonic integrated circuits are polarization sensitive. Thus, the con-
trolling of the polarization state of light in the photonic devices is of considerable importance,
which requires rotation, conversion, and separation of the different polarization states. It can be
done using a polarizer, a polarization rotator (PR), or waveplate. From last few decades, polari-
zation rotation has been demonstrated by various techniques, including birefringence of the
material,3 acousto-optic effect,4 thermo-optic effect,5 electro-optic effect,6 nonlinear effect,7 etc.
The polarization rotation has been demonstrated using the long-straight waveguide,8 the
bending waveguides,8 grating structures,9–13 plasmonic structures,14,15 metasurfaces,16 and other
photonic devices such as terahertz asymmetric demultiplexer,17,18 and microring resonator
(MRR).19–21 Among these, MRR has intrinsic periodic spectral response, small footprint, and
potential for high integration on silicon-on-insulator (SOI) platform, as few advantages. The
MRR-based all-optical switches (AOSs) are the building block to fulfill the growing data-com-
munication needs in polarization-dependent circuits.22–25 The polarization conversion between
the circular polarization states26,27 and the TE/TM mode-based (de)multiplexers are demon-
strated in the literature.28,29
MRR-oriented linear polarization-converter between the TE and TM modes are presented in
the literature,22 due to the sidewall slant angle in the waveguide19 and the dislocation between the
two vertically stacked rings of the MRR.1 There are various differences between Ref. 22 and the
present work. The proposed work is based on polarization rotation in MRR, which is described
in terms of the change in the azimuth angle (Ψ). But Ref. 22 is based on mode conversion in
MRR, which is described in terms of quasi-TE and quasi-TM modes. In this paper, the simulated
INTERCONECT results for polarization rotation have been verified by the Stokes parameter.
But in Ref. 22, the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulated results are verified by
numerical method in MATLAB. In this paper, the standard Jones matrix approach has been
employed with the FDTD/INTERCONNECT simulations. But in Ref. 22, the coupled-mode
theory approach has been used with FDTD simulations.
Reference 19 shows the rotation/conversion of two orthogonal modes due to the sidewall
tiltness of the MRR waveguides. The slope of waveguide causes the polarization rotation.
The radii of the MRR considered in Ref. 19 are 20 and 40 μm. In this paper, the Si-SiO2 material
combination is chosen. In this scheme, polarization rotation has been observed due to the change
of azimuth angle (Ψ). The polarization rotation has been achieved by enhancing geometry-
induced birefringence of the device and with the insertion of the PR in the race-track-shaped
MRR. The geometry-induced birefringence of the device has been enhanced by optimizing the
height and width of the MRR waveguide. The PR in the proposed device rotates the polarization
axis of an input polarized light by an angle of 30 deg. The tightly curved bending waveguide of
the race-track architecture of the MRR also supports the polarization rotation phenomena. The
radius of the proposed MRR is 10 μm, which is quite small compared to Ref. 19.
The polarization rotation/splitter in the single MRR is also achieved by the its coupling
section.20,25 In literature, the polarization selective MRRs are realized due to the introduction
of the bent directional couplers (DCs) of the MRRs, which are designed to work for only one
of TE and TM polarizations.25 The polarization selectivity of these special MRR-based optical
filters is realized by manipulating the polarization-dependence of the bending loss and the cou-
pling ratio for the bent DCs used. In this way, the critical coupling condition of a microresonator
is satisfied for one polarization only and is broken for the other polarization automatically.25
In the present work, a Si-SiO2 -based MRR that has small footprint and simple architecture
supports polarization rotation due to its high refractive-index (RI) contrast. The height, width,
and the other geometrical parameters of the MRR waveguide are optimized to enhance the geom-
etry-induced birefringence, as it affects the polarization and propagation of light.24 The proposed
architecture includes a PR to facilitate the polarization rotation/conversion phenomena.
The modeling and simulation of the proposed scheme is reported in Sec. 2. The results and
discussion of the proposed model are given in Sec. 3, and conclusions are provided in Sec. 4.
Fig. 1 Perspective view of the device. Inset is the cross-section image of the waveguide.
polarized light by a certain angle.21 The proposed device has been modeled in the following
sections.
where σ ¼ kðΔnx þ Δny ÞL∕2 and δ ¼ kðΔnx − Δny ÞL∕2 indicate the average value of phase
shift as well as the phase difference of the two components (x and y) prompted due to nonlinear
birefringence. The coefficients of Eq. (1) matrix elements are described in Ref. 21.
If the horizontal polarized light signal with unity amplitude is allowed to incident into the
MRR, the intensity magnifications inside the MRR are observed, which is beneficial for its non-
linear behavior. Higher the magnification, the stronger is the nonlinear contribution. The mag-
nification is dependent on the φ (orientation angle of the waveguide) and the θ (rotation angle of
the PR).
If the horizontal polarization (HP) is applied to the input of the proposed MRR, then the
output of the MRR is denoted as below:
E 0x 2jr sin δ þ m1 e−jσ þ m2 ejσ m4 e−jσ þ m3 ejσ
EQ-TARGET;temp:intralink-;e002;116;485
1 1
¼
E 0y M m4 e−jσ þ m3 ejσ 2jr sin δ − m2 e−jσ − m2 ejσ 0
0 jσ
E x 1 2jr sin δ þ m1 e−jσ þ m2 e
0
¼ : (2)
E y M m4 e−jσ þ m3 ejσ
To get the HP light at the output of the device, the magnitude of the matrix element
ð2jr sin δ þ m1 e−jσ þ m2 ejσ Þ∕M should be equal to 1 and ðm4 e−jσ þ m3 ejσ Þ∕M should be
equal to 0. Moreover, the MRR geometrical parameters are required to be optimum to get the
desired output. From the same HP light, vertical polarization (VP) light is obtained with the
application of suitable nature of the pump pulse. If a VP light signal is applied to the input
of the device, then the output of the device is denoted below:
E 0x 2jr sin δ þ m1 e−jσ þ m2 ejσ m4 e−jσ þ m3 ejσ
EQ-TARGET;temp:intralink-;e003;116;332
1 0
¼
E 0y M m4 e−jσ þ m3 ejσ 2jr sin δ − m2 e−jσ − m2 ejσ 1
0
E x 1 m4 e −jσ
þ m3 e jσ
¼ : (3)
E 0
y M 2jr sin δ − m2 e−jσ − m2 ejσ
To get the HP light at the output of the MRR, the magnitude of the matrix element ðm4 e−jσ þ
m3 ejσ Þ∕M should be equal to 0 and ð2jr sin δ − m2 e−jσ − m2 ejσ Þ∕M should be equal to 1.
Similarly, for the input VP light, the desired polarization state of light can be obtained with
the incident of the suitable nature of the pump (control) pulse.
Fig. 3 Variation of (a) effective RI and (b) group index with respect to wavelength (blue, TE mode;
red, TM mode).
Parameters Description
Waveguide material Si
Fig. 5 Modeled design of the device using simulation. (a) Proposed polarization rotation-based
circuit and (b) transmission spectrum of the proposed device.
resonant wavelengths (λr ) are noted as 1521.4 and 1529.47 nm, respectively. In this model, λr ¼
1529.47 nm is used to inject the input pump pulse to the device.16,22
Fig. 7 Simulated result of (a) VP (Ψ ¼ 87.88 deg) and (b) HP (Ψ ¼ 1.23 deg).
From the simulation results, it can be concluded that the proposed scheme can be used as a
polarization switch that can convert HP to VP and vice-versa with the application of suitable
nature of pump pulse. The simulated results for polarization rotation have been verified by the
Stokes parameter method.30
The simulated outputs of Stokes parameters are obtained from the simulation, which is
shown in Fig. 8. It is observed that S1 ¼ −1, S2 ¼ 0, and S3 ¼ 0 as shown in Fig. 8(a), which
correspond to Stokes parameters for VP light. Similarly, the Stokes parameter of the HP light is
obtained observed from Fig. 8(b), where S1 ¼ 1, S2 ¼ 0, and S3 ¼ 0, which corresponds to
Stokes parameters for HP light. The value of S0 for both HP and VP is always 1.
The propagation losses for both TE and TM modes are calculated and found to be −17.75 and
−12.11 dB, respectively, at the λr as shown in Fig. 9. The propagation loss includes the material
absorption loss, scattering loss, and radiation loss of the waveguide. The small bending radius of
the proposed architecture is responsible for the low radiation loss and similarly, the proposed
material combination is responsible for low scattering loss at the 1500- to 1600-nm region.
The insertion loss (IL) includes both the inherent loss of the waveguide and the coupling
losses. The expression for IL is given below:
I max
IL ¼ −10 log ; (4)
I input
EQ-TARGET;temp:intralink-;e004;116;357
where I input is the input light intensity and I max is the maximum output intensity received at the
output. The IL for the specified material and physical configuration is found to be −0.13 dB.
The extinction ratio (ER) is calculated to distinguish between the one polarization state to the
other polarization state. P1min and P0max denote the lowermost and the supreme values of the
intensity of the HP and VP light, respectively. The ER is found to be 19.39 dB by calculating
the below expression:
P1min
ER ðdBÞ ¼ 10 log 0 : (5)
Pmax
EQ-TARGET;temp:intralink-;e005;116;568
The device footprint is calculated and found to be 60 μm2 . The performance of the proposed
device has been compared with the recent literatures and is given in Table 3.
4 Conclusions
An all-optical polarization rotation-based switch has been demonstrated using MRR. The polari-
zation rotation has been achieved and complete switching has been observed. The proposed
device shows the ER of around 19.39 dB and the IL of −0.13 dB, respectively, along with the
compact size of 60 μm2 . The device is suitable for both SOI platforms. The numerical results
have been validated the Stokes parameter and the Jones matrix approach. Therefore, the pro-
posed concept proved to be a dominating candidate for the future optical routers, packet switches
as well as in all-optical information processing schemes where the polarization outputs are de-
pendent on the intensity or spectral history of the input.
References
1. G. Chen et al., “Polarization rotators in add-drop filter systems with double-ring resonators,”
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 26(10), 976–979 (2014).
2. M. Minz and R. K. Sonkar, “Design and analysis of a grating assisted hybrid mode and
polarization division (de)multiplexer,” Appl. Opt. 59, 785–794 (2020).
3. G. Cusmai et al., “Circuit-oriented modeling of ring resonator,” Opt. Quantum Electron. 37,
343–358 (2005).
4. J. Lu et al., “Recent progress of dynamic mode manipulation via acousto-optic interactions
in few-mode fiber lasers: mechanism, device and applications,” Nanophotonics 10(3),
983–1010 (2021).
5. W. D. Sacher et al., “Polarization rotator-splitters and controllers in a Si3 N4 -on-SOI
integrated photonics platform,” Opt. Express 22(9), 11167–11174 (2014).
6. K. Suzuki, T. Hirayama, and T. Arakawa, “Proposal of compact TE/TM polarization switch
based on microring resonator,” in 21st OptoElectron. and Commun. Conf. and Int. Conf.
Photonics Switching, Paper WD4-5 (2016).
7. C. Fietz and G. Shvets, “Nonlinear polarization conversion using microring resonators,”
Opt. Lett. 32(12), 1683–1685 (2007).
8. H. Zhang et al., “Efficient and broadband polarization rotator using horizontal slot wave-
guide for silicon photonics,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 101(2), 021105 (2012).
9. S. S. A Obayya et al., “Beam propagation modeling of polarization rotation in deeply etched
semiconductor bent waveguides,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 13(7), 681–683 (2001).
10. Y. Cehn and J. Xiao, “Compact silicon-based polarization beam splitter using directional
couplers assisted with subwavelength gratings,” Opt. Eng. 59(1), 017101 (2020).
11. H. Okayama et al., “Polarization conversion Si waveguide Bragg grating for polarization
independent wavelength filter,” in 11th Int. Conf. Group IV Photonics, pp. 145–146 (2014).
12. H. Okayama et al., “Polarization rotation Bragg grating using Si wire waveguide with non-
vertical sidewall,” Opt Express 22(25), 31371–31378 (2014).
13. Y. Su et al., “Silicon photonic devices for optical switching in wavelength, polarization,
mode,” in Opt. Networking and Commun. Conf., Paper WIE3 (2019).
14. L. S. Dizaj, K. Abbasian, and T. Nurmohammadi, “A three-core hybrid plasmonic polari-
zation splitter designing based on the hybrid plasmonic waveguide for utilizing in optical
integrated circuits,” Plasmonics 15, 2213–2221 (2020).
15. J. Dai et al., “All-optical logic operation of polarized light signals in highly nonlinear silicon
hybrid plasmonic microring resonators,” Appl. Opt. 54, 4471–4477 (2015).
16. S. Teng et al., “Conversion between the polarization states based on a metasurface,”
Photonics Res. 7(3), 246–250 (2019).
17. A. K. Cherri, “Polarization-encoded terahertz-optical-asymmetric-demultiplexer (TOAD)-
based all-optical multi-valued arithmetic units,” in Front. Opt./Laser Sci. XXVII, OSA
Technical Digest, Paper JWA33 (2011).
18. T. Chattopadhyay and J. N. Roy, “Polarization encoded TOAD based all-optical quaternary
literals,” Optik 121, 617–622 (2010).
19. B. E. Little and S. T. Chu, “Theory of polarization rotation and conversion in vertically
coupled micro resonators,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 12(4), 401–403 (2000).
20. P. D. Heyn et al., “Silicon-on-insulator all-pass microring resonators using a polarization
rotating coupling section,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 24(14), 1176–1178 (2012).
21. J. Li et al., “All-optical switch and limiter based on nonlinear polarization in Mach–Zehnder
interferometer coupled with a polarization-maintaining fiber ring-resonator,” Opt. Commun.
260, 318–323 (2006).
22. G. K. Bharti, J. K. Rakshit, and S. S. Pal, “Design and modeling of mode-conversion in ring
resonator and its application in all-optical switching,” Microsyst. Technol. 25, 295–306
(2019).
23. Q. Cheng et al., “Scalable microring-based silicon Clos switch fabric with switch-and-select
stages,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25(5), 1–12 (2019).
24. I. Kiyat, A. Aydinli, and N. Dagli, “A compact silicon-on-insulator polarization splitter,”
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 17(1), 100–102 (2005).
25. Y. Tan, S. Chen, and D. Dai, “Polarization-selective microring resonators,” Opt. Express
25(4), 4106–4119 (2017).
26. J. Wang and W. Wu, “Cavity-based linear-to-circular polarization converter,” Opt. Express
25(4), 3805–3810 (2017).
27. Y. Liu et al., “Linear polarization to left/right-handed circular polarization conversion using
ultrathin planar chiral metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. A 123(9), 571 (2017).
28. M. Minz and R. K. Sonkar, “Design of a hybrid mode and wavelength division (de)multi-
plexer based on contra-directional grating assisted couplers on the SOI platform,” Appl. Opt.
60(9), 2640–2646 (2021).
29. A. Kaushalram and T. Srinivas, “Zero-birefringence dual mode waveguides and polariza-
tion-independent two-mode (de)multiplexer on thin film lithium niobate,” Opt. Commun.
500, 127334 (2021).
30. A. Singh, “Stokes vector-based polarization management in optical communication system:
a review,” Opt. Eng. 59(9), 090901 (2020).
31. Lumerical Inc., https://www.lumerical.com/products/.
32. I. D. Rukhlenko, M. Premaratne, and G. P. Agrawal, “Effective mode area and its
optimization in silicon-nanocrystal waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 37(12), 2295–2297 (2012).
33. J. K. Rakshit, “Design of micro-ring resonator based 4 × 4 optical router for photonic
network applications,” Braz. J. Phys. 50, 582–593 (2020).
34. D. Vermeulen et al., “Silicon-on-insulator polarization rotating micro-ring resonator,” in
IEEE Photonic Soc. 24th Annu. Meeting, Arlington, Virginia, pp. 875–876 (2011).
Gaurav Kumar Bharti is an institute post-doctoral fellow in electronics and electrical engineer-
ing of the Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, India. He received the master of technology
(MTech) degree in electrical engineering from the National Institute of Technical Teachers’
Training and Research (NITTTR), Kolkata, India, in 2016. He received his PhD in the field
of photonics from the National Institute of Technology, Agartala, Tripura, India (an institute
of national importance in India) in 2020.
Ramesh Kumar Sonkar received his BTech degree in electronics and communication engineer-
ing from the Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee in 2001, MTech and PhD degrees from the
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur in 2003 and 2011, respectively. He joined IIT Guwahati
as an assistant professor in 2011. His research areas cover silicon photonics, integrated photon-
ics, fiber lasers optoelectronics device characterization and fabrication, microelectronics and
III–V compound semiconductors, and photonics integrated circuits.