You are on page 1of 4

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 40, NO.

4, JULY 2004 2053

A Study of the Design for the Flux Reversal Machine


Tae Heoung Kim and Ju Lee, Member, IEEE

Abstract—The three-phase flux reversal machine (FRM) is


a doubly-salient stator-permanent magnet machine with flux
linkage reversal in the stator three-phase concentrated windings.
It can operate in both motoring and generating modes. In this
paper, we identify stator/rotor geometrical design variables that
influence the cogging, interaction torques, and winding flux
linkage using a two-dimensional finite-element method and the
flux-magnetomotive force diagram technique. Also, the novel
design to improve the performance of the FRM is studied both
theoretically and experimentally.
Index Terms—Brushless, doubly salient permanent-magnet
motor (DSPMM), finite-element method, flux-magnetomotive
force (MMF), flux reversal machine (FRM), permanent magnet
(PM), switched-reluctance motor (SRM).

I. INTRODUCTION Fig. 1. Configuration of prototype FRM.

T O RETAIN the advantages of both switched-reluctance


and permanent-magnet (PM) machines, the flux reversal
machine (FRM) has been proposed [1], [2]. The FRM is a
glued onto the stator pole using Locktite 326 anaerobic super-
glue. The air gap was designed to be 0.5 mm to obtain a reason-
doubly salient machine with PMs on the stator. The PM flux able permeance coefficient value. The stator and the rotor pole
linkage in the stator phase concentrated coils reverses polarity arcs were designed to be 45 and 22.5 , respectively. Table I
with the rotor traveling. Its simple structure makes it cost summarizes the important FRM design specifications.
effective and suitable for mass production. It has low self- and
mutual inductances, hence a low electrical time constant and III. CALCULATION OF PHASE FLUX LINKAGE AND
high fault tolerance. With these advantages, the FRM can have COGGING TORQUE BY FE ANALYSIS
a considerable potential in automotive generators. However,
there is notable PM flux leakage (fringing) caused by its A. Governing Equation and Discretization
structure [3]. This flux leakage deteriorates the performance of The two-dimensional governing equation for the FRM is ex-
the FRM in terms of power density and torque constant. pressed in a magnetic vector potential as
In this paper, stator/rotor geometrical design variables that
influence the cogging, interaction torques, and winding flux
linkage are identified. To calculate cogging torque, a flux-MMF
diagram technique is used. Also, we propose the new design
(1)
to improve the performance of the FRM by reducing the flux
leakage in the air gap. To reduce its flux leakage, a concave-type
where
stator pole and a rotor pole with a flux barrier are used. By com-
component of magnetic vector potential;
paring with the experimental results, it is shown that the pro-
current density;
posed FRMs have an improved performance.
magnetization of the permanent magnet.
Applying the Galerkin method to (1), we can obtain the finite-
II. INITIAL PROTOTYPE FRM
element equation in a first-order triangular element as follows:
Fig. 1 shows the prototype FRM. It has a six-pole stator and
eight-pole variable reluctance rotor. Nd–Fe–B magnets were

Manuscript received October 15, 2003. This work was supported by the Min-
istry of Commerce, Industry, and Energy through the Energy and Industry Re-
search Centre Program.
The authors are with the Energy Conversion Laboratory, Department of (2)
Electrical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791, Korea (e-mail:
ktheoung@dreamwiz.com; ktheoung@ihanyang.ac.kr; julee@hanyang.ac.kr).
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/TMAG.2004.832488 where stands for shape function.
0018-9464/04$20.00 © 2004 IEEE

Authorized licensed use limited to: Balochistan University of IT Engineering and MS. Downloaded on November 30,2022 at 20:15:19 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
2054 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 40, NO. 4, JULY 2004

TABLE I
SPECIFICATIONS OF THE PROTOTYPE FRM

Fig. 3. Stator/rotor geometrical design variables ( ; ; ; D , and D ).

Fig. 4. Variation rate on each ratio among variables.

Fig. 2. Flux-MMF diagram for a permanent magnet.

B. Phase Flux Linkage Calculation


The phase flux linkage can be calculated from the average
vector potential over each winding cross section [4]

(3)

where is the stack length, and and represent the total


areas of an -turn winding carrying the positive current and Fig. 5. Phase peak-to-peak flux and cogging torque variation.
negative current, respectively.
easy matter of calculating instantaneous torque for every incre-
C. Cogging Torque Calculation mental rotor position using the rate of change of coenergy with
Fig. 2 shows a typical flux-MMF diagram for a permanent displacement as in
magnet that is constructed using a combination of flux-MMF
MMF
data obtained from the finite-element analysis and the demag- (5)
netization characteristic. Using finite-element solutions, values
of total flux emanating from the permanent magnet for any one Finally, total cogging torque is obtained by simply adding
pole are obtained at each rotor position. The corresponding together the cogging torques for the individual poles [5].
MMF values are obtained using the demagnetization curve as in
IV. EFFECT OF DESIGN VARIABLES
(4) Fig. 3 shows stator/rotor geometrical design variables. Fig. 4
gives the variation rate of winding flux linkage and cogging
where is the magnet length in the direction of magnetization, torque to each ratio among the variables. From this graph, we
and is the magnet pole area. know that magnet arc and rotor pole arc are the most im-
Variation of flux is then plotted against the variation of MMF portant geometrical dimensions of the FRM. Fig. 5 shows the
over one cogging torque cycle. Once the flux-MMF diagram for phase flux peak-to-peak variation and cogging torque against
any one pole is obtained, predicting cogging torque becomes an the ratio of magnet arc to rotor pole arc . The maximum

Authorized licensed use limited to: Balochistan University of IT Engineering and MS. Downloaded on November 30,2022 at 20:15:19 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
KIM AND LEE: STUDY OF THE DESIGN FOR THE FLUX REVERSAL MACHINE 2055

Fig. 9. Generated EMF of the conventional FRM at 2000 r/min.

Fig. 6. Configuration of the proposed FRM.

Fig. 10. Generated EMF of the proposed FRM at 2000 r/min.

effective flux linkage in the stator phase concentrated windings.


Fig. 7. Constructed stator and rotor assembly.
Figs. 9 and 10 show the generated EMF in the conventional
and the proposed FRM, respectively. The measurements were
carried out at no-load by driving the FRM using a brushless
PM motor. From these experimental results, we can see that
the proposed FRM has about 15% more generated EMF. The
proposed design is effective to increase a torque density and
efficiency.

VI. CONCLUSION
A new design to improve the performance of the FRM has
been proposed and studied both theoretically and experimen-
tally. The experimental results show that the proposed design
Fig. 8. Flux lines in the radial cross section. is effective to decrease the flux leakage in the FRM. Also, we
identified stator/rotor geometrical variables that influence the
cogging torque and winding flux linkage through a two-dimen-
flux variation occurs when is approximately equal to 1.2.
sional finite-element method. As a result, magnet arc and rotor
However, the minimum cogging torque occurs when is
pole arc are the most important geometrical dimensions of the
equal to 1.1. Tradeoffs may be made between the cogging torque
FRM.
and flux linkage. If we reduce the cogging torque by choosing a
proper , there will be a little reduction in the flux linkage.
REFERENCES
V. NEW DESIGN [1] Y. Liao, F. Liang, and T. A. Lipo, “A novel permanent-magnet motor
with doubly-salient structure,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat., vol. 31, pp.
In the FRM, there is notable PM flux leakage (fringing) 1069–1078, Sept.-Oct. 1995.
[2] R. Deodhar, S. Anderson, I. Boldea, and T. J. E. Miller, “The flux-
caused by its structure. This flux leakage deteriorates its per- reversal machine: A new brushless doubly-salient permanent magnet
formance such as phase peak-to-peak flux variation. To reduce machine,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat., vol. 33, pp. 925–934, July-Aug.
the flux leakage, we propose the new FRM that has a concave 1997.
[3] C. Wang, I. Boldea, and S. Nasar, “Three phase flux reversal machine,”
stator pole and rotor salient pole with a flux barrier in its edge IEE Elect. Power Applicat., vol. 146, no. 2, pp. 139–146, 1999.
as shown in Fig. 6. The prototype stator and rotor assembly [4] L. Chang, “In improved FE inductance calculation for electrical ma-
are shown in Fig. 7. These flux barriers play a very important chine,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 32, pp. 3237–3245, July 1996.
[5] R. P. Deodhar, D. A. Staton, T. M. Jahns, and T. J. E. Miller, “Prediction
role in the flux path. Fig. 8 shows the flux lines in the proposed of cogging torque using the flux-MMF diagram technique,” IEEE Trans.
FRM. The flux barrier and concave stator pole increase the Ind. Applicat., vol. 32, pp. 569–576, May-June 1996.

Authorized licensed use limited to: Balochistan University of IT Engineering and MS. Downloaded on November 30,2022 at 20:15:19 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.

You might also like