Project Assessment Rubric

PROJECT ASSESSMENT RUBRIC (COGNITIVE: 5%)

Performan
ce Criteria CPS
CLO- Score Weigh
PLO
Task & Attribute Performance Criteria Indicator Marks
Assessme (WP-WK) Given tage
nt Tool
Task: To WP 1 Fundamental Design Philosophy
provide The student will be able to demonstrate fundamental understanding of load path, stability of structures
conceptual and layout planning. Student demonstrate very clear and systematic outline concept through to
design to structures analysis (WK3) and working design (WK4). Clearly specify disposition of structural elements
produce (WK5). Very clear design idealization from theoretical and practical under applied load (WK6).
structural
layout
1 2 3 4 5

CLO 1 Assessme WK Develop lacking in Develop fair Develop acceptable Develop good Develop excellent
PLO 3
5 0.20 1.00
nt tool: 3,4, 5,6 conceptual design conceptual design conceptual design conceptual conceptual design
Report used and used and used and proposed design used and used and
proposed not proposed fairly acceptable proposed clear proposed very
clear structural clear structural structural lay-out structural lay-out clear structural
lay-out lay-out lay-out
Use at least 1 Use 1 WKs with Use 2 WKs with Use 3 WKs with Use more than 3
WKs but do not acceptable acceptable acceptable WKs with
elaborate elaboration elaboration elaboration acceptable
elaboration
Task: To WP 3 Sequence of Design Components
develop The student will be able to demonstrate systematic analysis and design calculation in accordance to
complete EC3. They should exhibit engineering mechanics (WK3), element design requirements (WK4), perform
design element design (WK5) following code-of-practice (WK6).
work
based on
CLO 1 1 2 3 4 5
PLO 3
structural 4 0.30 1.20
lay-out
Assessme WK Incomplete design Fairly design work Acceptable design Good complete Excellent
nt tool: 3,4,5,6 work following following current work following design work complete design
Report current code of code of practice. current code of following current work following
practice. practice. code of practice. current code of
practice.
 Use at least 1 Use 1 WKs with Use 2 WKs with Use 3 WKs with Use more than 3
WKs but do not acceptable acceptable acceptable WKs with
elaborate elaboration elaboration elaboration acceptable
elaboration
Task: e.g. WP 7 Detailing of connections
To The student will be able to interpret connection required based on preliminary design. They should
integrate exhibit engineering mechanics (WK3) and element analysis (WK4) by integrating engineering design
loading (WK5) with engineering practice (WK6).
distribution
with
connection 1 2 3 4 5
CLO 1 adopted.
PLO 3
Assessme WK Demonstarte Demonstrate fair Demonstrate Demontstrate Demonstrate
nt tool: 3,4,5,6 unclear integration integration of acceptable good integration excellent 4 0.50 2.00
Report of connected connected integration of of connected integration of
elements with elements with connected elements elements with connected
choice of choice of with choice of choice of elements with
connections. connections. connections. connections. choice of
connections.
Use at least 1 Use 1 WKs with Use 2 WKs with Use 3 WKs with Use more than 3
WKs but do not acceptable acceptable acceptable WKs with
elaborate elaboration elaboration elaboration acceptable
elaboration

2
CLO 2 – Practical and technical skills (Psychomotor) (7.5%)

Criteria Multiplier Scale Total Marks

Bad Poor Average Good Excellent

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Part B – Creative and 

innovative items in delivering 9
idea/design concept

Part C – structural layout 

Able to demonstrate clear and 9
good judgment in structural
layout, drawing, and detailing.

Part C – Analysis using 

software 2
Able to demonstrate the
combined practical and
technical computer skills for
engineering design solution.

/ 100

CLO 3 – Communication skills (Affective) (5%)- LECTURER ASSESSMENT

3
 Criteria Multiplier Scale Total Marks

Bad Poor Average Good Excellent

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Report 
Systematic, well organized, 8
clear, professionally written
and presented.

Weekly Reflection 
Identification of problem, 12
solution/how to solve,
references/ sources

100 / 100

CLO 3 – Communication skills (Affective) (2.5%)- STUDENT PEER

4
 ASSESSMENT FORM

Name of member 1 All members in the group

being assessed:

Criteria Multiplier Scale Total Marks

Bad Poor Average Good Excellent

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Team Work involvement 

Good attitude, good timing, 20
quality outcome, contribute in
discussion.

100 / 100