Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Allen A. Espinosa
Abstract
This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the Modified Useful- Learning approach against
the traditional teaching approach in improving students’ critical thinking skills and attitude towards
chemistry. Specifically, it sought to find out if the mean posttest score in the critical thinking appraisal
and chemistry attitude scale is significantly higher for students exposed to the MUL approach than for
the students exposed to the traditional teaching approach.
This study used the quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control-group design. The sample of the study
consisted of two intact sections of junior students at Diliman Preparatory School, Quezon City during the
School Year 2005-2006. Thirty six (36) students were taught using the MUL approach, whereas thirty
eight (38) were exposed to the traditional teaching approach. The instrument used in this study is the
Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal and the Chemistry Attitude Scale developed by the
researchers. The instruments were content validated by group of experts and was pilot tested.
The MUL group showed a significantly higher posttest mean score in the critical thinking test than the
traditional counterpart. Moreover, the mean rating in the attitude scale of the MUL group was found to
be significantly higher than that of the traditional group.
Based on the results of the study, it is recommended among others, that the Modified Useful Learning
(MUL) approach be used by science teachers in their teaching as it was shown in this study that the
approach helps students improve their critical thinking skills and attitude towards chemistry.