Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Clinton, a vintage clothing retailer, sent the following signed letter to Stacy on January 3: “I
promise to sell you my collection of rare vintage Victorian hats for $15,000. This is a firm offer
that will be open until January 17 and will not be withdrawn before that date.” Stacy received the
offer on January 5.
On January 8, Clinton changed his mind and decided he did not want to sell the hats. He
sent a letter to Stacy, which she received on January 11, in which Clinton stated that he was
On January 12, Stacy sent a letter to Clinton, accepting his offer. Due to delays in the
mail, Clinton did not receive this letter until January 19. When Stacy went to Clinton's store on
January 21 to pay for the hats and arrange for delivery, Clinton said there was no contract and
(a) In action by Stacy against Clinton for breach of contract, judgment for whom?
Explain.
This is an irrevocable offer because Clinton signed a contract with formal language of the
"will remaining open until" and not to be withdrawn. Therefore, the second letter sent by
Clinton revoking the offer has no effect. On the other hand, Stacy's acceptance concerning the
offer was not received until after the earlier set deadline, as per the rule in the mailbox.
Therefore, Stacy's acceptance of the offer was valid from the moment she accepted, which was
on January 12. Therefore, Stacy's action against Clinton for contract breaching would favor
states, “This offer will expire on January 17.” Would this change your answer to
This would not change my answer because Stacy had already accepted the offer, and the mailbox
decided to delay. Even after Clinton was revoked, the court would still judge in favor of Stacy.
This is because the offer was to expire on January 17, and Stacy had accepted earlier.