2.01778552382 2.pharmaceuticals 3.CHILDREN PLAYGROUND 3.manuscripts 4.LOCK 4.sublimation 5.FLYER 2000 5.simple drying 6.BLUE 6.chamber 7.FLAT 7.shelves 8.8 DAYS 8.freezing coil 9.HILL FARMER STAY 9.compressor 10. LOCAL 10.enzymes 11. fishman 11.composition and structure 12.6 months 12.overheating 13.captain 13. high altitudes 14.family 14.TRUE 15. relative 15.TRUE 16.common 16.FALSE 17. festival 17.NOT GIVEN 18.A 18. TRUE 19.B 19. FALSE 20.D 20. a plausible alternative 21.B 21. exotic flowers 22.C 22. domestic cats 23.A 23. 81 24.B 24. B 25.G 25.C 26.C 26.E 27.E 27.C 28.CLOTHES 28.iii 29.FASHION SHOWS 29.vi 30.PROJECT 30.vii 31.PHYSICAL 31.viii 32.INSTINCT 32.i 33.OWN 33.iv 34.SINGLE 34.C 35.AUDIENCES 35.B 36. SHOW 36.B 37.STORE 37.B 38.BLOOD 38.B 39. IMMUNE SYSTEM 39.A 40.BAD DREAM 40.B TASK 1 5.5 The given tables indicate the world population and distribution from 1950 to 2050. Overall, it is readily apparent that the figure for people living in Africa,Asia,Latin America and Oceania recorded an upward trend while the reverse was seen in Europe, North America. Looking at the chart for more detail, it can be seen that the number of citizens in 2000 stood at 6 millions, 3.5 millions higher than that in 1950 before increasing to 9.0 estimately in 2050. Following that, the gap between the proportion of inhabitants in Europe and in North America was narrowed, with the former decreasing by 15% from 22% and the latter declining by 3% from 7% in 2050. Concerning the remaining types, the figure for people staying in Latin America and Oceania followed relatively similar patterns, also recording a period of stability at 9% and 1%, respectively, despite mild variations in 2050. In contrast, there was a marginal increase by 2% in the figure for citizens living in Africa in 2000, while that in Asia recorded a mild growth to 60% from 56%. In 2050, the percentage of inhabitants staying in Asia is supposed the data representing 59% will be approximately 3 times as much as that in Africa. TASK 2 4.5 (~4.0) In the contemporary world, there has been much discussion revolving around the issue of whether using fossil fuel comparison finding the altered products for them. From my perspective, the latter is definitely beneficial in many ways. -TR Compelling arguments can be made that using the presented fuel is necessary –CC/TR. The primary factor that needs to be taken into consideration is that vehicles which are powered by diesel are convenient for them. Drivers usually have some experience with their cars in this way. To be more exact, some drivers own cars that are inherited. For example, the man who owns the car given to him by his father is usually unwilling to sell his present. Moreover, having the car before the idea makes them consider that it will waste money if they change it to a new item. It is difficult to change their attitudes to this solution for a long time.??? In contrast, some others may claim that it is crucial to have safe fuels substituting the old sources. The fundamental reason for this is that inhabitants in the world can be aware of that as they use vehicles provided with fossil fuels which are damaging the natural environment. For instance, there are a wide range of cars in the town that can lead to air pollution as well as noise pollution and it is unhealthy with personal health -CC. In addition, the extinction of fauna and flora increases consistently as well as citizens will suffer -GRA from toxins from cars using fossil fuels. In order for our natural resources to stabilize, the government should expand the usage of renewable source energy, such as cars using solar energy. To sum up, in spite of the fact that the use of fossil fuels is common, the advantages of safe renewable energy surely outbalances its disadvantages. -TR