Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down.

Others however believe that

zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals.
Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.

Minh Anh
The bar charts compare a the number of Europeans living in 2 different areas:
urban and suburban respectively are disturbed by noise pollution from 4 factors,
regarding day and night in 2007.
The bar charts compare the number of Europeans living in the countryside and
the city being affected by noise at different times of day.
Overall, traffic was a the factor which/that affected the largest number of people
while the reverse was true for industrial activities. caused noise for the most
number of both citizens and rural people by both day and night. Factors causing
the noise for citizens and rural people followed a similar rank/Also, the levels of
noise polution generated by trains and aircrafts were comparable in both of the
studied regions. . Moreover the noise from industry unnoticeable affected
surrounding people.
Regarding cities, by day and night, the figures for people affected by noise from
traffic experienced the highest data, 64 and 48 million respectively. In
comparison, the number of people annoyed by the noise from the train at night
was one-sixth that of traffic. Besides, standing at 4 million, the figure for
citizens who are affected by noise from aircraft by day was four times as many
as that by night.
From the graph, it was witnessed can be seen that noise from the industry in
remote areas did not affect people living there in 2007. According concerning to
aircraft factor, with the number of 2 million by day, there were twice as many
people who are affected by this type of noise during daytime compared to that
by night.

Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others
however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals.
Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.
In the contemporary world, there has been much discussion revolving around the
abolition of zoos. Some people assert that zoos have a great deal of detrimental
and should be banned, whereas others argue that zoos have more advantages
than disadvantages. Personally, I am in favor of the former view for a number of
reasons.
Zoos are beneficial to some extent. The primary reason that should be taken into
consideration is the educational value that zoos have to offer. Zoos give
opportunities of observing wild animals for both students and scientists. To be
specific, children learn about biology just through pictures in their books. As a
result, visiting a zoo brings them a chance to widen their horizon, observing
closely real animals. Regarding scientists, they can do more research and
compare the differences of effects on wild animals with habitat changes.
Additionally, zoos protect endangered animals from the verge of extinction. As
long as these animals are kept inside zoos, they can not be hurt or even killed by
hunters. good, main/support rõ ràng. Tuy nhiên main 1 em nên đổi đi một chút.
Cần bám đề be useful in protecting wild animals. Scientists thì OK rồi (vì bảo vệ
động vật), tuy nhiên children thì không thấy liên quan đến bảo vệ lắm.
Despite the abovementioned upside, I tend to believe that zoos are cruel. The
obvious factor is that animals have rights as humans. Apparently, their own
natural habitat is more suitable for them than zoos. In any circumstance, forcing
animals to leave their home is immoral./ Apparently, their own natural habitat is
more suitable for them than zoos, which means forcing animals to leave their
home is immoral. In the second place, many/the majority of zoos inadequately
take care of animals. Although they are given regular food, drink, and even
medical treatment, in reality, these treatments do not entirely meet their needs.
For example, abandonment (sự bỏ rơi) is often witnessed in a zoo. Aquatic
animals have too little water and herd animals are kept alone or in pairs.=> kết
quả của việc này là gì?
In conclusion, although zoos surely have several merits, demerits should not be
ignored. As a consequence, I would assert that zoos are cruel to some extent and
should be replaced by more humane alternatives such as natural revervations.

Gia Phat Luong

The bar charts illustrates the number of people in Europe who were affected by
4 major causes of noises in both cities and rural areas, regarding day and night in
2007.
Overall, it is obvious that people who lived in cities are more affected by noises
than those who lived in rural areas, regarding irrespective of the time of the day.
It is also worth noticing that traffic is was the main contributer in to noises in
both perspective areas, while the opposite is was true for industry.
Looking at the bar charts for cities, we can see over 64 million people were
bothered by the noises coming from traffic during the day, and 48 million people
being affected by the same factor at night. While the majority of people are
affected by traffic both day and night, only a few million people are affected by
other factors such as aircrafts, trains and industry, with the last factor affecting
the lowest number of people. Đoạn sau này em bị tóm tắt quá, không đưa đc một
số liệu nào hết vậy
The bar charts in for rural areas has a similar pattern to the first one, with traffics
affecting up to 34 million people during daytime and 24 million people at night,
while other factors like trains and aircrafts affect only 8 and 2 million people
during the day, and 6 and 1 million at night, with industry affecting no one at
all.Câu này dài quá (cả đoạn là một câu), tách ra nhé.
I can only submit this essay, the zoo one will be submitted tomorrow, since the
rest of my schedule are full(and I have to have lunch now).
Nguyễn Quý Hoàng
the bar charts detail how many European were bothered by various types of
noise during day and night in the cities and the countryside in 2007
Overall, people were annoyed by noise more during the day whether they lived
in cities or rural areas. Remarkably, the number of people ,who were affected by
traffic, dominated in all 4 types.
The number of rural citizens suffering from noises from vehicles noise of the
traffic were nearly half lower than that of the cities with respectively 24 and 48
million at night, 34 and 64 million at day. In comparison with the countryside,
the cities had 2 millions people more affected by train noise.The figures for the
cities were 10 million at during the day and 8 million at night.
Concerning aircraft, In the cities, 4 million people were affected from noise at
daytime whereas the figure for the rural was a half with 2 million inhabitants. At
nights, both areas shared the identical number of people suffering from noise.
Least people were affected by industry, in cities , the figure for this were only 1
million and 0,25 million citizens at day and night respectively while in the
countryside, no one are was affected by the noise from industry.

In the contemporary world,some groups of people believe that zoos, which seem
is often deemed to be cruel, should be closed, whereas others think zoos can
help in animal conservation. From my perspective, i agree with the latter views
On the one hand, it is easy to understand why many people want to eliminate
zoos. Firstly, Keeping them in capacity is detrimental to their life. More
specifically, in the zoos, animal are supplied everyday with appropriate food and
water. With the predator, being fed without competitive fighting or hunting their
preys to eat can make their instinction significantly degrade. Secondly, zoos
sometimes can be a hash habitat to animals. Evidently,they could be cruel
treated by the zookeeper's. For instance, they could be beaten by them. Some
herd animals are kept alone or in pair can make them feel lonely and have some
abnormal behaviors
On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for protecting animals to
have zoos. Zoos can be their sheltered accommodation. Obviously, many
Endanger species , which are on the edge of extinctions, are preserved carefully
in the zoos. Zoos can help these precious animals not only avoid being hunted
by the predators or the poachers but also breed more easily. Furthermore, due to
many forest or natural habitats of animals are being destroyed by humans due to
the development of the human society, Zoos can be used as a new home for
these animals.
Inclusion, In conclusion, although zoos can surely have a number of adverse
effetcs on advantages for animals, their importance in preserving animals should
not be ignored. As a consequence, I would assert that zoos should not be closed
and should be upgraded and developed.
Hải Nam
The given bar charts compare how many people living in rural and urban areas
were disturbed by noise from four different sources during the daytime and the
nighttime in 2017.
Overall, it can be easily seen that traffic noise was the most important prominent
factor causing noise pollution for most people in two areas during both day and
night. In addition, there is was no noise from industry that affected rural people.
To be more specific, daytime noise from traffic affected 64 million people in
urban areas and 34 million people in rural. At night time, the number of city
residents annoyed by traffic was double that of rural people. Regarding noise
pollution coming from trains, the number of people were affected is was much
lower than that of traffic in urban and rural areas, at 10 million people and 8
million people respectively during the daytime, and 8 million people and 6
million people respectively at night. tốt
The levels of noise pollution generated by the remaining two sources of noise
pollution were significantly lower. According to aircraft factor, Concerning
aircrafts, in the day, the noise disturbed 4 million city residents and half of that
in rural areas. During the nighttime, the figure for both cities and rural areas was
1 million people. Those living in rural areas were not affected by the industry’s
noise. However, 1 million people living in urban areas experienced industrial
noise during the day and, four times higher than the number affected at night.
Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down; however,
others believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both
views and give your own opinion.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
In this day and age, there has been more discussion revolving around the issue
of whether zoos should be abolished or not. Some people assert that zoos have
detrimental effects on wild aminals and should be banned, whereas others argue
that zoos bring plenty of benefits. Personally, I am in favour of the latter view
for many reasons
On the one hand, zoos can be seen negatively to some extent. Firstly, it is easy
to understand that why some people would think that zoos do not approach the
satisfaction standard of care for animals. To be more specific, animals may
suffer abuse, neglect, or even death through boredom, unfamiliarity with their
new habitats, and cruel treatment. For example, zoochosis in animals can be
seen easily in many zoos. Furthermore, animal captivity is a way of
entertainment for humans. For instance, Zoo trainers tend to use smart animals
such as dolphins or seals to perform water circus to appeal to people coming and
seeing them. Besides that, some roadside zoos use animals with the primary
purpose is to attract customers to other facilities such as hotel, restaurant, or
store. Hệ quả những việc này? Việc dùng nó để entertain bla bla thì tàn nhẫn thế
nào? Những ý này thực ra để counter cho những ai nói “zoos có tính giáo dục
mà”. Lúc đấy em mới bảo “nhầm rồi, chỉ là để giải trí thôi”
On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for wild animals when they
live in zoos. Firstly, general treatment in zoos for most animals is better than
when they live in wildlife. They are given food and water regularly, a
comfortable environment suited for their particular needs, and most importantly,
medical care- something they would not receive from wildlife. Secondly,
endangered species may be protected from extinction in zoos. As they are kept
in the zoo, there is no chance for them to be hurt or killed by both predators and
hunters/poachers. Besides, scientists have more valuable opportunities to study
animal genes, thus they can find some new animal hybridizing methods to
preserve these species
In conclusion, zoos have some disadvantages, but the benefits should not be
ignored. As a consequence, I would assert that zoos are useful and should be
maintained to protect wild animals, especially endangered animals
Good job Nam!
lương thị mỹ duyên
The two graphs illustrate how many people living in rural and urban areas were
influenced affected by various kinds of noise pollution during daytime and
nighttime in Europe in 2007.
Overall, in both areas, millions of people were affected by all four sources noise
pollution during the day. Specifically, the traffic was overwhelmingly the main
source of noise, followed by trains, aircraft, and industry.
In the daytime, noise from trains affected 34 million people in countryside,
which was higher nearly being twice that of suburban residents. The figures for
traffic noise in rural areas were substantially lower than that for urban in
nighttime, which with the former being 24 million people and the latter standing
at 48 million. In terms of trains, in cities, 10 million people were impacted in the
day and 8 million at night, in comparison to the residents in the rural area, which
were marginally lower at 8 million for daytime and 6 million for nighttime.
The figures for aircraft in the daytime recorded 4 million for local people in
metropolitan areas urban centers and half that number in the countryside. Noise
from aircraft in both areas in the nighttime was stand stood at 1 million people.
None of the people in rural areas were affected by noise from industry.
Meanwhile, 1 million city residents experienced industrial noise pollution in the
daytime, four times the number affected at night.
Nowadays, there has been much discussion revolving around the issue of
whether abolishing zoos might be is a good way to avoid some negative attacks
on animals comparison or keeping wildlife conservation is the way people
protect wild species in the world. Personally, I am in favor of the latter view for
a wide range of reasons.
Compelling arguments can be made that zoological gardens pose a threat to
animal species. The primary factor we need to take into consideration is that
animals are is not treated with much consideration carefully when they are
confined in safari park. For example, the news about an African elephant was
beaten with axe handles for two days. That is to say, if these animals which are
not obedient, being suffered they may suffer from abuse and punishment by
zookeepers until they follow exactly directions. As the result, because of mental
terror, they fail into ‘zoochosis’ syndrome, which is of which symptoms are
abnormal and self-destructive behavior caused by in captivity.
On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for wildlife sanctuaries is a
great solution to protect the wild animals. Despite the abovementioned upside of
removing zoos, I tend to believe that keeping safe wild species in safari parks
enjoys more benefits overall. First and foremost, Endangered species may be
conserved from extinction in zoos. These rare animals as a great bargain allow
unauthorized sale. Keeping these animals not only balances the earth's
ecological systems but also reduces illegal trade. Moreover, none of the
documentaries is better than seen seeing in reality so these play a vital role in
academic aspects. Students have opportunities to observe closely animals, as
well as learn how they can move or understand the kingdom of all endangered
species under stringent safeguards. Not only having beneficial for obtaining
knowledge related to animal world for students but also affording a valuable
chance to study animals in strange environments for scientists. Nên chốt thêm
một câu việc scientists study thì có lợi thế nào cho động vật (nghiên cứu thuốc
chữa bệnh cho động vật, cross-breed để làm sống lại các đv đã tuyệt chủng)
To sum up, Having considered all the arguments above, I would conclude that
instead of shuting down the zoos, we should aim to better the conditions in
which captive animals live, these should remain continuously, which enjoy more
advantages overall.
Khánh Huyền Vũ Good job em!
*Task 1:
The provided charts compare urban and non-urban areas in Europe in terms of
the amount of population who suffered from different types of noise in 2007.
It is noticeable that citizens had to deal with much more noise than their country
counterparts. Another striking point is that people were mostly annoyed by the
traffic noise regardless of where they live.
Standing at 64 million and 48 million for day and night respectively, the number
of city dwellers influenced by the sound of vehicles are was two-fold higher
than those living in the countryside. Meanwhile, in daytime, the proportion of
inhabitants bearing with train noise in both places are 2 million higher than that
of night. thêm số liệu
Concerning the night time data in the cities in terms of airplane noise, the figure
decreased by a factor of 4 from 4 million people in the daytime. Likewise, the
number of people enduring the noise from aircraft experienced a two-fold
decline at night to 1 million people. There are were more than 1 million people
per day in towns who had to face with noise pollution coming from industrial
activities, whereas nobody in the non-urban areas was were affected by that.
*Task 2:
In this day and age, there has been much discussion revolving around the issues
of whether zoos should be abolished due to the cruelty they did to/inflict on
animals or should they be kept as a way to preserve wild species. And your
opinion is…?
To begin with, it is immoral to remove animals from their natural habitats. That
is to say, they have survived and evolved in nature for thousand years, it is
therefore undeniable that they belong to their own habitats, and people have no
discretion to catch them to meet our entertaining and educational demand.
Furthermore, the removal of some species can establish the cause of ecosystem
balance since some wild animals may come to grips with the shortage of food
resources.
Some people argue that animals exhibited captivated in the zoos have to suffer
from abuse, neglect, or even death through boredom and unfamiliarity with the
alien environment. Moreover, that animals are confined may also have an
adverse impact on not only their physical heath but also their mental health.
However, animals are indeed provided sufficient food and water, appropriated
environment, and especially medical treatment, which they cannot be given in
the wild; hence, their chances to survive is undoubtedly higher in the zoos.
Endangered species; besides, benefited for the most part of this advantage, for
they can be protected from being hounded by stronger creatures or carnivores. In
addition, such that animals can be bred to maintain their captivity.
Finally, it may be concluded that some upsides can be observed in both schools
of thought; nevertheless, I am more inclined to the latter viewpoint on account
of the protection animals gained gain from this.