You are on page 1of 2

Harzelli meriem civ and lit

If Diaspora writers who live in exile suffer issues of loss of identity, displacement and
nostalgia to homeland, what about women who are in exile who bear double burden besides
being in the exile. Diaspora women’s writings are the mere reflection of what a woman can be
in a western society, suffering from marginalization, ect. Their literature have things
(features) in common Diaspora literature whereas, they have other points in contrast.
All post colonial writers suffer from being culturally colonized and being the outcome of
the horrible circumstances they lived in or witnessed during their childhood. Most of women
writers shard the idea that their writings try in a way or another to be “… about the business
of finding new angles enter reality; the distance, geographical culture enables new structures
of feeling. It resists cultural authoritarianism and challenges official truths.” (Aizaz, 39)
according to the quotation, Diaspora women writings share the idea of being displaced both
culturally and geographically. These characteristics are shown in their choice of their
characters in their literary works. In fact, women writings prefer to talk about marginalized,
displaces women they prefer to talk about uprooted characters who can’t find their lost selves
The lost of identity is not the only theme shared by women Diaspora writers, but also the
revolutionary spirit they have against all cultural authority and challenges of official truths.
Character of Diaspora women writing reject all the constraints of the culture that they don’t
belong to. This spirit is exactly what characterizes female characters in Diaspora literature
besides to their rejection of all social rules. They, indeed, question the supremacy of the
oriented culture. Despite all the shared features of women Diaspora writings, still there exist
some differences.
Among the differences between women Diaspora writing s is that the degree of feeling of
nostalgia to the home such as Asian writers are not like African writers. If we take an
example, the African Diaspora characters they suffer more than others; their feeling is much
more bitter than most of non African female characters. Besides being uprooted culturally,
most of them were uprooted geographically twice, thus their sense of identity lost and their
sense of belonging is almost nonexistent. And when it comes to their refusal to social norms,
they might be fears full than other characters. Even their strive for existence can be described
as being fueled.
With unfinished sense of part underestimation and bad treatment. All in all, alt although
Diaspora writing have one frame work, and mainly share common features of being
dislocated and suffering the loss of identity, they are different in some aspects.
Harzelli meriem civ and lit

In conclusion, the setting and the characters of Diaspora literature are common in most
Diaspora writing. These stereotypical characters frame most of the Diaspora writing
especially of women writers. They can be called the writers of the exile, their witness of
displacement affected badly their sense of belonging and identity, this can be touched in their
writings. However, their writings sometimes reflect the position of each community with
different flavor i.e in a different way Asia dispora literature is different than Arabic and then
African

You might also like