Women in Management Review

Women and men in senior management – a “different needs” hypothesis

Victoria J. O’Connor
Article information:
To cite this document:
Victoria J. O’Connor, (2001),"Women and men in senior management – a “different needs” hypothesis", Women in
Management Review, Vol. 16 Iss 8 pp. 400 - 404
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006291
Downloaded on: 30 January 2016, At: 09:05 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 27 other documents.
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 2045 times since 2006*
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:
Janet Cooper Jackson, (2001),"Women middle managers’ perception of the glass ceiling", Women in Management Review,
Vol. 16 Iss 1 pp. 30-41 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09649420110380265
Ronald J. Burke, (1993),"Women on Corporate Boards of Directors", Equal Opportunities International, Vol. 12 Iss 6 pp. 5-13
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb010613
Wen-Lung Shiau, Patrick Y.K. Chau, (2012),"Understanding blog continuance: a model comparison approach", Industrial
Women in Management Review 2001.16:400-404.

Management & Data Systems, Vol. 112 Iss 4 pp. 663-682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02635571211225530

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:194288 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service
information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please
visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of
more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online
products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication
Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.

*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

 !
!
" # "
!

$ !

% !
Women in Management Review 2001.16:400-404.

!
!
!

! !
! &
$ '
! ! ( '
'
!
" #
!! ! # (
$ $ $ ) * #
!! +#
% ! !! , $
!&
!! ' ! ( -
!! ( !
( ! .
$

" ) / '
!
) ! * $ $ !

$ !
) ! ! *
$
! 0 /* 0+
! "
1 2
/ / 3 4 *

,(1

) -1 +00
+ ,- . $ / 011, 2113212 ) - 5 +00
4 % # . 15-2&5206 1 - 5 +00
 + 7 ' + ,- . $ / 011, 2113212

60 *+
+ ! +# -
+ $ ! $

! ! !
!
& 5 @
-

7
87 A

5 @ 6
! ! $
! :
. 81 $ !
9 # +66 -
$ ' !
! ' 5 !
' $ ;! !

!
Women in Management Review 2001.16:400-404.

: ! 5
$ ! !
! : ; ! !
!
!
!
! !
! & !
* -

! ! :
; !.
% ! & !
*

(
. $
! !
5
$
! ! ! !
! $
! 4; $ <
/ 7 !
$ !!
! ! ! ! $
9 ; ! !
# 4 !
!
' 5
! '

5 = 3 3 $
& & > ? $ $ ! ! $
 + 7 ' + ,- . $ / 011, 2113212

! ! ! -
1 : * !
5 1 : ;! "
*A " *A ) / +#
+ $ :
!
!
$
; $ :

!
! $ !
( ! 5
! !

!
$B ' $
! C
! $ . $
$ $ (
Women in Management Review 2001.16:400-404.

$ +
: '
'
!
!

: ! !
!

$ !
;!

( 8
= - 3 ! !

!
5
$ 5
@ 0
! $
( ) # +0
! B
$
! 5&
( 6/A 5 +
: 1 !
D ! 1:5

! ! !
7
" ) / +6 -
$ !
( & + * 7

- $

$
 + 7 ' + ,- . $ / 011, 2113212

!; ! 4
$ '

'
5 !
@ $ 6*A @ $ 6 7 ( . 5
! ( . ! 5 +
$ -
! $ ! !
!
) (
!
$
1
! ! #0 60
. + $ !
! 5 . " " 6
@ ' " 7 !
" 0
. !
- : !
. ' .
! !
Women in Management Review 2001.16:400-404.

! ; 7
$ !
! !
7
! ! $ $
$
.
.
) (

" * 7
! $
!
. $
!
!
!
! $
5 $ 6 0 !
- $
$

7 !

! ! 6 5
: !

.
$
! .
> 3 + // -
! !
! 7
 + 7 ' + ,- . $ / 011, 2113212

! # 7 !A
! + ,. 0 06@&/0
B + 9,5/2: "
+ 5 ,,2&,/
:
B ?4 B ? 9,5/1: 8 !!
! 4 4
1 7 " 9,5/D: . !
,2 7 !%
% + 6@ . 6 500&@0
! 8 9,5D@: B
C 4 " ! =
! :
% .7
' $ AA 7 " . 9,5D2: ) % !
' ! 8 !! ! % !
! " B 9,55D: =
' 5 9,5-0: ) % !4
! . # % .7
7 8 9,5/5: 4 C)
.
8 !! 4

%! !! 7 9,550: % B
4 % 4
% =. 4 ! 8 9,552: #
!
.7 # 8 . 9,552: 7 + @D -/&/-
Women in Management Review 2001.16:400-404.

; 4 < + 65 4 A 9,5/5: =
. , /5&56 E C
= 9,55,: $ % 4 + ,16 . , 6,&//
,55,&50 4 % . 6 7 > 9,552: ) !
=% $ & 7 !'
4* " 8> ? ? 9,55-: % 4 + ,6 ,55&01D
!! ! 7 > 9,556: ) !
$ % 4 ! 7 !
+ ,01 . 0 ,-@&// + 4 + 2D 051&@,6
$ 7 9,5/-: ! 7 9,555: ) ) "
" + ,, /2&5@ 7 ,0&,@ 05&@1
A B 9,556: ) ! 7 . 9,5/0: !!
% + 61 C !!
. @ ,26&6/ 7 9A :
9) : A 9,550: C 7 &4 >
) A + @00 . DD/0 ,D0&0,/
,D&01 ) % 9,55-: %
B A= B 7 9,55D: !& !
3 " % 1-F5-
+ 01 . , 00&/ 8 ! $
B 9,556: ( ) % 9,55D: A !
"! C # % + @0
! + ,. , . , ,5&0/
,,&02 ) % 9,55/: = !!
B 8 9,55@: " % -@F5/
C ! 8 ! $
 This article has been cited by:

1. Moran Betzer-Tayar, Sima Zach, Yair Galily, Ian Henry. 2015. Barriers to women’s access to decision-making positions
in sport organizations: the case of establishing a girls’ volleyball academy in Israel. Journal of Gender Studies 1-14.
[CrossRef]
2. Bruno Felix von Borell de Araujo, Cesar Augusto Tureta, Diana Abreu von Borell de Araujo. 2015. How do working
mothers negotiate the work-home interface?. Journal of Managerial Psychology 30:5, 565-581. [Abstract] [Full Text]
[PDF]
3. María del Mar Alonso-Almeida, Kerstin Bremser. 2015. Does gender specific decision making exist?. EuroMed Journal of
Business 10:1, 47-65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
4. Najma R. Sharif. 2014. Occupational skill attainment in Canada: the role of gender, nativity status and ethnic origin.
International Review of Applied Economics 28, 695-712. [CrossRef]
5. Shimin Liu. 2013. A few good women at the top: The China case. Business Horizons 56, 483-490. [CrossRef]
6. Rocío Marco. 2012. Gender and economic performance: Evidence from the Spanish hotel industry. International Journal
of
Hospitality Management 31, 981-989. [CrossRef]
7. Wayne H. Decker, Thomas J. Calo, Christy H. Weer. 2012. Affiliation motivation and interest in entrepreneurial
careers.
Journal of Managerial Psychology 27:3, 302-320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
8. Paul Smith, Nadia Crittenden, Peter Caputi. 2012. Measuring women's beliefs about glass ceilings: development of the
Career
Pathways Survey. Gender in Management: An International Journal 27:2, 68-80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Women in Management Review 2001.16:400-404.

9. Mohamed Aboelmaged, Abdallah ElaminTeleworking in United Arab Emirates (UAE) 183-212. [CrossRef]
10. Ruth Sealy. 2010. Changing perceptions of meritocracy in senior women's careers. Gender in Management: An
International
Journal 25:3, 184-197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
11. LUCREZIA SONGINI, LUCA GNAN. 2009. WOMEN, GLASS CEILING, AND PROFESSIONALIZATION IN
FAMILY SMEs: A MISSED LINK. Journal of Enterprising Culture 17, 497-525. [CrossRef]
12. Geraldine Grady, Alma M. McCarthy. 2008. Work‐life integration: experiences of mid‐career professional working mothers.
Journal of Managerial Psychology 23:5, 599-622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
13. Samia Kargwell. 2008. Is the glass ceiling kept in place in Sudan? Gendered dilemma of the work‐life balance. Gender
in
Management: An International Journal 23:3, 209-224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
14. Nelarine Cornelius, Denise Skinner. 2008. The Careers of Senior Men and Women – A Capabilities Theory
Perspective.
British Journal of Management 19:10.1111/bjom.2008.19.issue-s1, S141-S149. [CrossRef]
15. James Ike Schaap, Yvonne Stedham, Jeanne H. Yamamura. 2008. Casino management: Exploring gender-based
differences in perceptions of managerial work. International Journal of Hospitality Management 27, 87-97. [CrossRef]
16. Nelarine Cornelius, Denise Skinner. 2005. An alternative view through the glass ceiling. Women in Management Review 20:8,
595-609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
17. Manuela Pérez Pérez, Angel Martínez Sánchez, Pilar de Luis Carnicer, María José Vela Jiménez. 2004. A technology
acceptance model of innovation adoption: the case of teleworking. European Journal of Innovation Management 7:4, 280-
291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
18. Concha Antón, Eugenio Garrido. 2004. Women's anxiety about professional success: 30 years later in a Spanish context.
Women in Management Review 19:7, 364-372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
19. Manuela Pérez Pérez, Angel Martínez Sánchez, María Pilar de Luis Carnicer. 2003. The organizational implications of
human resources managers’ perception of teleworking. Personnel Review 32:6, 733-755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
20. María Pilar de Luis Carnicer, Angel Martínez Sánchez, Manuela Pérez Pérez, María José Vela Jiménez. 2003. Gender
differences of mobility: analysis of job and work‐family factors. Women in Management Review 18:4, 199-219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
21. Dimitrios G. Mavridis. 2002. Cherchez la femme – women as managers in Greek corporates: an empirical investigation.
Equal
Opportunities International 21:7, 21-36. [Abstract] [PDF]
22. Manuela Pérez Pérez, Mu Pilar de Luis Carnicer, Angel Martínez Sánchez. 2002. Differential effects of gender on
perceptions of teleworking by human resources managers. Women in Management Review 17:6, 262-275. [Abstract] [Full
Text] [PDF]