50 - 23 / 2020

654.1-192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33577/2312-4458.23.2020.50-57

1 2 3 4
. , . , . , .
1
2
",
3
,
4
,

,
, , .

-
.

, ,
:
( , , , , -
, IP ),
: , , ;
; .
-
,
( , ; -
, ;
),
(
).

: , , , , .

-
( )
[4 13].
,
-
[1 3]. , , -
, , .

- ( ,
, .
; , -
, -
, ,
;
, ), –

. -

© . , . , . , .
23 / 2020 51

, , , n2 , n3 , , nk N ; n0 – ,
1

, n – .
). n10 n10 n10 nk0 nk0 nk0 ,
1 2 k 1 2 k
, -

( , , ) ( n10 nk0 ) .
1 2

, ni 1 N 2 , ni 2 N 1
. ,
- .
( ) -
,
: -
: , ,t , ;
( , , .),
- t , ,l ; m, , t , ,t ,
( ) , , –
.
; t , –
; t , –
, - ,
. ; l – ;
m – ; –
,
- ( 0 – 1
, : , , ); t , –
( , ,
; t –
), ,
(
- ).
( , -
, , ,
) [14].
,
, :
,
T0 t f1 , , ;
-

t,t f2 , , ;
. , -

, t f3 , , ;

[15].
K t f4 , , ;

, , -
, P t, t f5 , , .
G(N, ), N ni – : ,
( , ),
; -
M mij – .
-
n10 n2 n3 , , nk 1 nk0 , n10 , nk0 N0 ; ; ,

© . , . , . , .
 52 - 23 / 2020

:
; , , ;
, .
. ( ),
, - ,
;
-
, -
.
, ,
-
. -
.
» « » . -
[8, 16].
, « » - ( ,
,
, , -
. - ) ,
« » - ,
: , . -
- ,
( , - , , -
, , , , .
IP- .), - -
, -
( . 1).

1
»

2
»

3 4 5

6 7 8

9
, ,
,

10

. 1.

© . , . , . , .
23 / 2020 53

- -
. , F t Pt t .
(« » - m 1
) - . -
,
, t 1 ; t 1 ;
). , -
. t 1 ; t t ; t t .
. [17,
, 18]
, - ( )
- ( ),
. - :
n 1
1 xn m m
) n 1 m m 1 , T0 t n i q1 k ; (4)
n m! i 1
.
- xn m m
P t, t exp n t n i q1 k ; (5)
m! i 1
,
. 1
T t q1T q 2T t , (6)
q0
( )
, m
m qn
- i , l 1,
m! i 1 0
( ) . q0 q1 q2 q1 (7)
m m
, 1 qn
i i , l m;
m! i 1 0
i – ,
i . m 1
, l 1, m
i - m 1 m m
, l 1,
T x 1 (8)
, 1
, l m 1; 1, l m;
m 1
,
t t dF t 1
i n m i , i 0,1,2, ,m ; (1) T t xdF x t ; (9)
t
1 F t 1 F t t
i n m i , i 0,1,2, ,m . (2)
i – (2); 0 – (1) =0; q –
0 , 1 –
. (3); k ; t ; x m dF x ;
m
( ) 0
- 1
- T t
t 1; K t 1 ;
t – - T0 t
F t Pt t . - P t, t K t P t, t . (10)
– t
, ,
. q , ( ) ( ).
[18, 19]
( ) :
( t t ), 1 1
T0 t ; (11)
q 1 kq

q Pt t 1 F t . (3) t
P t, t exp exp t1 k q ; (12)
T0 t
(
) . t k qT t
T t ; (13)
l 1 l m 1 1 k q

© . , . , . , .
 54 - 23 / 2020

T t
1 1 1
1 T0 t ; (17)
K t 1 1 t k qT t ; (14) 5
1 t
T0 t 0i t 0
i 1
P t, t K t exp t1 k q , (15)
5
P t, t Pi 1 t , t
i 1
(18)
t t dF t 1 5
T t xdF x t ,(16) 1 ;
exp t 0i t exp t t
t
1 F t 1 F t t i 1

1
F t Pt t, q Pt t 1 F t ,k . 5
0i t
T t T i1 t ; (19)
i 1 0 t
( -
) . .2 - 5
, K t K 1i t
, i 1
. 5 T0i1 t T0 t
62
1 1
; (20)
i 1 T0i t T t T0 t T t

1 23 2
P t K t P t, t
1
5
IP
T0 t
36
exp t 0 t , (21)
4
T0 t T t

1
5
i t ,t ; T i1 t ; K 1
i t ; P i t,t ,
4 3 1
T01i t 1
, i 1,5 –
0i t
( . 3 ), -
. 2.
(4) – (16).
, ,
I14 , - I14 ( . 4),
, , . 2.
.
. 3 ( , 1 2 3
1, 3, 4 ,
2, 5 , - 4 5 6
).
7 8 9 10 11

. 4.
,
: I14

.4 :1– 1, 2–
1 2 3 4 5
m14 , 3 – 4, 4 –
2
)
5 m12 , 5 – 2 ,6–
m24 , 7 – m13 , 8 – 3 ,9–
1 2 3 4 5
m35 , 10 – 5 , 11 –
)
m 45 .
(1-5) -
)
.
. 3. 4 – 6 7 – 11 -
: 3 4 , -
;
; T0 t ,
P t ,t , T t , K t , P t ,t

© . , . , . , .
23 / 2020 55

, (17) – (21) ( 3 4 , (
)( . 5 ). (25) – (27)) 6
. 5 ),
1 2 5 ( . 4) -
, -
3(e)
I14 .

4(e)

1 2(e) 5 , , , -
,
) ,
. ,
(1,2(e),5)(e)
:
) 1.
. 5.
I 14 : -
; .
; 2. ,
,
( T0 t , P t ,t )
2, 3 , 4 –
2 ( . 5 ), P t ,t . ,
: K t .
P 2 t, t 1 1 P 2 t,t 1 P 3 t, t 3. ( )
( )
1 P 4 t, t ; (22) – -
t -
2 2 3
K t 1 1 K t 1 K t .
4 t ,
1 K t ; (23)
t ,
2 2 3
P t, t 1 1 P t, t 1 P t, t – « »
) ,
1 P 4 t, t . (24)
(
) .
1, 2 ,5 - -
6 ( . 5,
) - , -
,
( 6 ):
-
1 2 5
P t, t P t, t P t, t P t, t ; , ,
, , , -
1 2 5 .
Kt K t K t K t ;

P t, t P 1 t , t P 2 t, t P 5 t, t ,
1 5
P 1 t ,t ; P 5 t ,t ; K t ; K t ; P 1 t,t ,
( ) -
P 5 t,t .
(12), (14) (15).
2
P 2
t,t ; K t P 2 t, t
1. . ., . ., . .,
(22), (23) (24). . .
:

© . , . , . , .
 56 - 23 / 2020

. 18. Mogylevych D., Kononova I, Kredenzer B., Oksiiuk O.

, 2019. . 1 (34), 91-101. DOI:
https: // doi.org.10.30748/nitps.2019.34.13.
2. . . - Elements. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Trends
, .
, 2015. . 12/2015. C. 27-33.
3. . ., . .,
. .
. , 2017.
. 1(49). . 42-49.
4. . .
. . 2014. . 2, . 13 15.
5. Ahmad W., Hasan O., Pervez U. and Qadir J. Reliability
modeling and analysis of communication networks. Journal of
Network and Computer Applications. 2017. Vol. 78, pp. 191-
215. DOI: https: //doi.org.10.1016/j.jnca.2016.11.008
6. Dieves V. Dependability in Future Battle Network
System — Transport Layer Ability to Maintain Quality of
Service. Wireless Sensor Network. 2016. Vol. 08, Iss. 10, pp.
211–228. DOI: https: //doi.org10.4236/wsn.2016.810017
7. Samaniego F. J. Studies in Structural, Stochastic and
Statistical Reliability for Communication Networks and
Engineered Systems. Final Report on ARO grant W911NF-
111-0428, 2016, no. 31.
8. Hall P., Jin Y. and Samaniego F.J. (2015) Nonparametric
estimation of component reliability based on lifetime data
from systems of varying design. Statistica Sinica, no. 25, .
1313 – 1335. DOI: https: //doi.org10.5705/ss.2014.192
9. Jin Y., Hall, P., Jiang J. and Samaniego, F. J. (2017)
Estimating Component Reliability Based on Failure Time
Data from a System of Unknown Design. Statistica Sinica, no.
27, pp. 479-499. DOI: https: //doi.org10.5705/ss.202015.0209
10. Zhu P., Han J., Guo Y. and Lombardi F. (2016)
Reliability and Criticality Analysis of Communication
Networks by Stochastic Computation. IEEE Network, Vol. 30,
Iss. 6, pp. 70-76. DOI: https: //doi.org10.1109/ mnet.2016.
1500221nm
11. Li T., Cole B., Morton P. and Li D. (1998) Cisco Hot
Standby Router Protocol (HSRP). RFC 2281. Network
Working Group.
12. Zdorenko Yuriy, Lavrut Oleksandr, Lavrut Tetiana,
Nastishin Yuriy. Method of Power Adaptation for Signals
Emitted in a Wireless Network in Terms of Neuro-Fuzzy
System. Wireless Personal Communications, . 1-13. DOI:
10.1007/s11277-020-07588-5.
13. Klymovych Oleg, Hrabchak Volodymyr, Lavrut
Oleksandr, Lavrut Tetiana, Lytvyn Vasyl and Vysotska Victoria.
The Diagnostics Methods for Modern Communication Tools in
the Armed Forces of Ukraine Based on Neural Network
Approach. MOMLET 2020 (Modern Machine Learning
Technologies Workshop). P. 198-208. URL: http://ceur-
ws.org/Vol-2631.
14. 2860-94. .
. . . 1995. 96 .
15. . .
. 2010. . 3. . 139-144.
16. . ., . .
. . 2016.
256 .
17. . ., . .,
. Wireless Personal Communications, . 1-13. DOI: 10.1007/
. . 2017. . 2. . 48-57.
Reliability of Redundant Telecommunications Equipment
Advanced Model Considering Failures and Refusals of Structure
in Information Theory (ATIT) 2019. pp. 238-243. DOI: https://
- doi.org/10.1109/ATIT49449.2019.9030502
19. Mogylevych D. and Kononova I. (2019) Improved
. ., Estimates for the Reliability Indicators of Information and
- Communication Network Objects with Limited Source
Information. In: Ilchenko M., Uryvsky L., Globa L. (eds).
Advances in Information and Communication Technologies.
UKRMICO 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering,
Springer, Champ., vol 560, pp. 101-117. DOI: https:// doi.org/
10.1007/978-3-030-16770-7_5.
References
1. Lavrut O.O., Lavrut T.V., Klymovych K.O., Zdorenko
Yu.M. Novitni tekhnolohii ta zasoby zviazku u Zbroinykh Sylakh
Ukrainy: shliakh transformatsii ta perspektyvy rozvytku. Nauka
i tekhnika Povitrianykh Syl Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy, 2019. Vyp. 1
(34), . 91-101. DOI: https: //doi.org. 10.30748/ nitps.
2019.34.13.
2. Lavrut O.O. Doslidzhennia yakosti upravlinnia potokamy
informatsii u modeli viiskovoi telekomunikatsiinoi merezhi
predstavlenii v tenzornomu vyhliadi. Viiskovo-tekhnichnyi
zbirnyk, 2015. Vyp. 12/2015. . 27-33.
3. Lavrut O.O., Klymovych K.O., Tarasiuk M.L., Antoniuk
O.L. Stan ta perspektyvy zastosuvannia suchasnykh tekhnolohii
ta zasobiv radiozviazku v Zbroinykh Sylakh Ukrainy. Systemy
ozbroiennia i viiskova tekhnika, 2017. Vyp. 1(49). . 42-49.
4. Netes V.A. Reliability of communication networks in IEC
standards. Vestnyk sviazy. 2014. No. 2, .13–15.
5. Ahmad W., Hasan O., Pervez U. and Qadir J. Reliability
modeling and analysis of communication networks. Journal of
Network and Computer Applications. 2017. Vol. 78, pp. 191-
215. DOI: https: //doi.org10.1016/j.jnca.2016.11.008
6. Dieves V. Dependability in Future Battle Network System –
Transport Layer Ability to Maintain Quality of Service. Wireless
Sensor Network. 2016. Vol. 08, Iss. 10, pp. 211–228. DOI:
https: //doi.org10.4236/wsn.2016.810017
7. Samaniego F. J. Studies in Structural, Stochastic and
Statistical Reliability for Communication Networks and
Engineered Systems. Final Report on ARO grant W911NF-111-
0428, 2016, no. 31.
8. Hall P., Jin Y. and Samaniego F.J. (2015) Nonparametric
estimation of component reliability based on lifetime data from
systems of varying design. Statistica Sinica, no. 25, . 1313 –
1335. DOI: https: //doi.org10.5705/ss.2014.192
9. Jin Y., Hall, P., Jiang J. and Samaniego, F. J. (2017)
Estimating Component Reliability Based on Failure Time Data
from a System of Unknown Design. Statistica Sinica, no. 27, pp.
479-499. DOI: https: //doi.org10.5705/ss.202015.0209
10. Zhu P., Han J., Guo Y. and Lombardi F. (2016)
Reliability and Criticality Analysis of Communication Networks
by Stochastic Computation. IEEE Network, Vol. 30, Iss. 6, pp.
. 70-76. DOI: https://doi.org10.1109/mnet.2016.1500221nm
11. Li T., Cole B., Morton P. and Li D. (1998) Cisco Hot
Standby Router Protocol (HSRP). RFC 2281. Network Working
Group.
12. Zdorenko Yuriy, Lavrut Oleksandr, Lavrut Tetiana,
. . Nastishin Yuriy. Method of Power Adaptation for Signals
- Emitted in a Wireless Network in Terms of Neuro-Fuzzy System.
s11277-020-07588-5.

© . , . , . , .
23 / 2020 57

13. Klymovych Oleg, Hrabchak Volodymyr, Lavrut Oleksandr,
Lavrut Tetiana, Lytvyn Vasyl and Vysotska Victoria. The
Diagnostics Methods for Modern Communication Tools in the
Armed Forces of Ukraine Based on Neural Network Approach.
MOMLET 2020 (Modern Machine Learning Technologies
Workshop). P. 198-208. URL: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2631.
14. DSTU 2860-94. Nadiinist tekhniky. Terminy ta
vyznachennia [State Standard of Ukraine 2860-94. Dependability
of technics. Terms and definitions]. Kyiv. 1995. 96 .
15. Stoikova L.S. Generalized Chebyshof inequalities and
their application in mathematical reliability theory. Cybernetics
and Systems Analysis, 2010. Vol. 3, . 139–144.
16. Vyktorova V.S. and Stepanians A.S. Models and methods
for calculating the reliability of technical systems. Lenand.
2016. 256 .
17. Kononova I., Kredentser B., Mogylevych D. Estimation
of gain in reliability at complex use of surplus in objects of
telecommunications. collection of scientific works . Kyiv.
2017. Vol. 2, . 48–57.
18. Mogylevych D., Kononova I, Kredenzer B., Oksiiuk O.
Reliability of Redundant Telecommunications Equipment
Advanced Model Considering Failures and Refusals of
Structure Elements. IEEE International Conference on
Advanced Trends in Information Theory (ATIT) 2019. pp. 238-
243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ATIT49449.2019.9030502
19. Mogylevych D. and Kononova I. (2019) Improved
Estimates for the Reliability Indicators of Information and
Communication Network Objects with Limited Source
Information. In: Ilchenko M., Uryvsky L., Globa L. (eds).
Advances in Information and Communication Technologies.
UKRMICO 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering,
Springer, Champ., vol 560, pp. 101-117. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-
030-16770-7_5.

. , . , . , .
,
, , .

,
: –
( , , , , ,
IP- .),
: , , ; – -
( ); –
.

, ,
( , ;
,
; ), – -
.
: ; ; ; ; .
ECHNIQUE OF COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT OF RELIABILITY OF TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT
OF COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
D. Mogylevych, I. Kononova, O. Klymovych, V. Mohylevych
The effectiveness of the functioning of telecommunication systems, which belong to the class of complex technical systems,
depends on the reliability of its subsystems and elements, as well as the complexity of the relationships between them. The aim of
the article is to substantiate a general approach to a comprehensive assessment of the reliability of telecommunication equipment
telecommunications network with a reducible structure with the development of a methodology for calculating equipment
reliability indicators.
This article presents a formal description of a scientific problem and offers a general approach to solving the problem is
based on the use of the decomposition principle, which allows a phased assessment of the reliability of a telecommunication
network at three interconnected levels: the first stage is at the level of individual equipment elements (such typical devices as
routers, switches, servers, workers stations, IP-encryption equipment, etc.), in which various types of redundancy can be
provided separately or jointly: structural, load, temporary; the second stage – at the telecommunication equipment level of
information paths (routes); the third stage is at the telecommunication equipment level of information areas, which are a
combination of equipment of various paths.
Methodology for solving the problem. A technique has been proposed for a comprehensive reliability assessment of
telecommunication equipment of communication networks with a reducible structure, taking into account a combination of
factors, some of which are aggressive and lead to a decrease in reliability (failures causing short-term interruptions in
operation; steady equipment failures that need to be restored to serviceability of failed devices in a repair body ; insufficient
qualification of the attendants), and others – support the normal functioning of the telecommunication equipment in at the given
level
Keywords: reliability; telecommunication equipment; refusals; failures; redundanc.

© . , . , . , .