Horizontally Launched Projectile

Method 1

V. Data:
Height H = 0.109m

Order 1 2 3 4 5 6 Average
Range (m) 0.46 0.48 0.69 0.48 0.65 0.51 0.54

VI. Analysis:

With Xi = 0m and Xf = 0.54m in average, we get that ΔX = 0.54m.

Using: ΔX = Vi * Δt

0.54 = Vi * Δt

Δt = 0.54/ Vi

With Yi = 0.108m and Yf = 0m, we get that ΔY = -0.108m

Formula: ΔY = 0.5 * g * Δt2

-0.108 = 0.5 * -9.8 * 0.542 / Vi2

Vi = 3.64 m/s
 Method 2

V. Data:
Height H = 0.109m

Order 1 2 3 4 5 6 Average
Initial Velocity (m/s) 3.68 3.55 3.58 3.65 3.70 3.63 3.63

VI. Analysis:

With Vi = 3.63m/s in average

Using the following formula R = Vi ∗ √2𝐻/𝑔

R = 3.63* √2 ∗ 0.108/9.8

The range is R = 0.54m

VII. Conclusion and discussion:

.
Our almost identical effects lead us to finish that each tactics are dependable, and we are able to hence
use the consequences in any condition
 Non-Horizontally Launched Projectile

V. Data:

Horizontal Range Angle

(m) 15° 30° 35° 45°
1 0.78 0.74 0.38 0.32
2 0.63 0.66 0.35 0.28
3 0.69 0.43 0.50 0.30
4 0.72 0.52 0.45 0.22
Average (m) 0.705 0.588 0.42 0.28
Ground height (m) 1.1 1.13 1.14 1.15

Time of flight (s) 0.969 1.05 0.845 0.723

Theoretical Range 0.936 0.784 0.641 0.519
(m)
Error (%) 24.7 25 34.5 46

VI. Analysis:
. For diverse unknown elements, we will see that there’s a large hole between our
theoretical results and the experimental
The time of flight and theoretical range were calculated with the following formulas:

H=v^2sin^2/2g R=v^2sin 2/g

VII. Conclusion and discussion:

We draw the belief that idea and fact can occasionally diverge as validated on this
test. Our findings had been extraordinarily one of a kind, which clearly startled us all.