3. Analyze how cities serve as engines of globalization
Cities are centers of innovation and businesses. They portray the economic, social, and political state of the country and its people. Cities are categorized differently depending on the role they play on the global scene. Although the city of Tokyo is the largest in the world with a population of about 38,000,000, it is considered an Alpha + city, one level below the cities of New York and London which are considered Alpha ++ cities. Other Alpha + cities include Shanghai, Tokyo, Dubai, Singapore, Hong Kong, Paris, and Beijing. To be considered a global city, an urban center must prove it enjoys a significant global advantage over other cities and serves as a hub within the world economic system. Initially, global cities were ranked depending on their size. Today, several other factors other than the size of the city are being considered. Amsterdam, Houston, Mexico City, Paris, São Paulo and Zurich have all grown to be global cities. These cities possess several similar characteristics including Home to several financial service providers and institutions, headquarters to large multinationals, dominate the trade and economy of their countries and are a major hub for air, land and sea transport. They are also centers of innovation, boast of well-developed infrastructure, large population of employed people and act as the centers of communication of global news. Global city, an urban center that enjoys significant competitive advantages and that serves as a hub within a globalized economic system The use of "global city", as opposed to "megacity", was popularized by sociologist Saskia Sassen in her 1991 work, The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo though the term "world city" to describe cities that control a disproportionate amount of global business dates to at least the May 1886 description of Liverpool by The Illustrated London News. Patrick Geddes also used the term "world city" later in 1915. Cities can also fall from such categorization, as in the case of cities that have become less cosmopolitan and less internationally renowned in the current era. LONDON, United Kingdom NEW YORK, USA TOKYO, Japan A number of studies were undertaken to produce various rankings. However, when you look at them, you see that the definition of global city used is far broader than Sassen’s core version. Some of the general characteristics people tend to refer to when talking about global cities. It cites a very lengthy list, but some of them are: 1. Home to major stock exchanges and indexes 2. Influential in international political affairs 3. Home to world-renowned cultural institutions 4. Service a major media hub 5. Large mass transit networks 6. Home to a large international airport 7. Having a prominent skyline New global cities have since arisen not only as financial centers but also producers of services that are global in scope. Global cities are post-industrial and manufacturing has been scattered across national and global networks. It turns from “landscapes of production” to “landscapes of consumption”. Apart from being financial centers, global cities are:
1. Geopolitical power centers
2. Cultural and trendsetting powerhouses 3. Higher education hubs 4. Creative Industries 5. Nature of activities generates a specific labor demand: 6. A professional class of knowledge workers 7. Highly mobile, career minded not necessarily elites 8. “Brain hubs” and centers of a “knowledge economy” 9. Economies of scale and concentration necessary despite the proliferation of communications technology There are seven types of global cities driving the world economy: The first three are the world’s leading economic power centers. 1. Global Giants: These are the world’s leading economic and financial centers, its foremost global cities. They include New York, Los Angeles, London, Paris, Tokyo, and Osaka-Kobe. 2. Knowledge Capitals: These are world’s leading knowledge and tech hubs. They include 19 cities centers such as San Jose (the Silicon Valley), Boston, Seattle, San Diego, Washington, D.C., Chicago, Austin, Dallas, Atlanta, Portland, and Denver in the U.S. and Amsterdam, Stockholm, and Zurich in Europe. 3. Asian Anchors: These are Asia’s five established and rising economic power centers: Hong Kong, Singapore, Seoul-Incheon, Shanghai, Beijing—and Moscow. Their ability to attract foreign direct investment makes them serious global power players despite having lower levels of economic output than the Global Giants. In addition to the global economic powerhouses, the report identifies four other types of global cities in the U.S. and around the world which occupy the middle ranks of the world economy. Some are growing in sync with globalization; others are more challenged by it. There are seven types of global cities driving the world economy: 4. American Middleweights: These are 16 mid-sized U.S. metro areas, including places that are growing via connections to the global economy, including Miami and Rustbelt metros like Cleveland, Detroit, and Pittsburgh, which have up until now, have seen their major industries challenged by global competition. 5. International Middleweights: This group includes 26 mid-sized metros outside the U.S., including Toronto and Vancouver in Canada; Brussels, Rome, Milan, Berlin, Vienna, Madrid, and Barcelona in Europe; Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth in Australia; and Tel Aviv in the Middle East. Many of these cities are aspiring tech and knowledge hubs and serve as centers for talent, as well. 6. Factory China: This set includes 22 second- and third-tier Chinese cities that are manufacturing powerhouses. Even though these metros have experienced rapid growth based on export-intensive manufacturing, they remain relatively poor. 7. Emerging Gateways: These are 28 large global business and transportation gateways for major national and regional markets, including Mexico City, Sao Paolo, Rio de Janeiro, Istanbul, Mumbai, and Johannesburg. Although globalization certainly affects rural and peril urban areas, global forces are centered in cities. It is in cities that global operations are centralized and where we can see most clearly the phenomena associated with their activities, whether it is changes in the structure of employment, the formation of powerful partnerships, the development of monumental real estate, the emergence of new forms of local governance, the effects of organized crime, the expansion of corruption, the fragmentation of informal networks or the spatial isolation and social exclusion of certain population groups. The characteristics of cities and their surrounding regions, in turn, help shape globalization, for example by providing a suitable labor force, making available the required physical and technological infrastructure, creating a stable and accommodating regulatory environment, offering the bundle of necessary support services, contributing financial incentives and possessing the institutional capacity without which globalization cannot occur. Thus, cities mediate the reciprocal relationships between economic globalization on the one hand and human development on the other. They form an important link in processes of globalization and their implications for human development. Criticisms of Global Cities: Despite playing significant roles in the global economy, global city thesis has been known for being a threat to state-centric perspectives. These cities have been accused of focusing their reach to other global cities and neglecting cities within the national outreach. These cities are more connected to the outside world than to their domestic economy. Although they are interconnected and interdependent, global cities are always in a competitive state. The cities of New York and London have been trying to outwit each other as the global financial centers. Local governments have been keen to promote the global cities within their territories as either economic or cultural centers, or sites of innovation. Other downsides: High costs, alienation, impersonality, social isolation Discrimination against migrants of certain kinds A global city is a significant production point of specialized financial and producer services that make the globalized economy run. Sassen covered specifically New York, London, and Tokyo in her book, but there are many more global cities than this. The question then becomes how to identify these cities, and perhaps to determine to what extent they function as global cities specifically, beyond all of the other things that they do simply as cities.
Winnie Lem, Belinda Leach-Culture, Economy, Power_ Anthropology As Critique, Anthropology As Praxis (S U N Y Series in Anthropological Studies of Contemporary Issues)-State University of New York Pres.pdf