Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Societal level
At this level, it is important to understand each of the political, economic, social, technological,
environmental, and legal (PESTEL) factors—and, more specifically, the trends affecting those
factors—that will have an impact on a food and diary vendor of an African kitchen on a
particular idea. Some venture ideas might be screened-out and others might be worth pursuing at
a particular time because of the trends occurring with those PESTEL factors.
a. legislature - includes Parliament and legislative assemblies, which are the main decision and
law making bodies of the country in Canada and laws on food in Canada.
c. Judiciary –Supreme Court, High Court and other courts permits importation of African food
in Canada .
•Economic system of the country –Socialist, Capitalist, Mixed Economy that permits foreign
food in Canada.
Consists of culture, traditions, values, buying habits, consumption patterns and lifestyles of a
society
•These elements influence the buying behavior of the members of the society.
•Culture determines the types of goods and services a business should produce.
• It refers to people’s attitude to work and wealth; role of family, marriage, religion and
education; ethical issues and social responsiveness of business.
Technology
• used to transform material, information, and other inputs into finished goods and services on
foreign foods in Canada
• New techniques in African food production process in order to ensure quality and innovation
• New and better technology helps in minimizing costs, reducing wastages and upgradation as
they spend crores of rupees on research and development and introduce new products.
Legal environment
It refers to set laws, regulations which influence the business organizations and their operations.
Using an appropriate tool like the PESTEL model to assess both the current situation and the
likely changes as they may affect the business organization.
Political factors – federal & provincial & municipal government policy, nature of
political decisions, potential political changes, infrastructure plans, etc.
Economic factors – bank interest rates, inflation rates, exchange rates, tax rates, GDP
growth, health of the economy, etc.
Social factors –population characteristics like age distribution and education levels,
changes in demand for types of products and services, etc.
Industry level
The first stage of industry analysis is to identify the key elements of the industry’s structure. In
principle, this is a simple task. It requires identifying who are the main players – the producers,
the customers, the suppliers, and the producers of substitute goods – then examining some of the
key structural characteristics of each of these groups that will determine competition and
bargaining power.
In most manufacturing industries the identity of the different groups of players is usually
straightforward, in other industries – particularly in service industries – building a picture of
the industry may be more difficult. Consider the television industry. There are a number of
different types of player and establishing which are buyers, which are sellers, and where the
industry boundaries lie is not simple. In terms of industry definition, do we consider all forms of
TV distribution or identify separate industries for broadcast TV, cable TV, and satellite TV? In
terms of identifying buyers and sellers, we see that there the industry has quite a complex value
chain with the producers of the individual shows, networks that put together program schedules,
and local broadcasting and cable companies that undertake final distribution. For the distribution
companies there are two buyers – viewers and advertisers.
This level focus more specifically on the sector of the economy in which you intend to operate.
Again, the right analysis tool must be used for the assessment to be effective and avoid technical
jargon (i.e. threat of new entrants) and use simpler wording (i.e. difficulty of entering the market)
or flip to an analysis of the threat (i.e. strategies to establish and maintain market share).
Using an appropriate tool like the Five Forces Model (Porter, 1985) to analyze the industry in
which you expect to operate.
In practice, there are many features of an African kitchen industry that determine the
intensity of competition and the level of profitability. A helpful, widely used framework
for classifying and analyzing these factors was developed by Michael Porter of Harvard
Business School.
Porter’s Five Forces of Competition framework views the profitability of an industry (as
indicated by its rate of return on capital relative to its cost of capital) as determined by five
sources of competitive pressure. These five forces of competition include three sources of
“horizontal” competition: competition from substitutes, competition from entrants, and
competition from established rivals two sources of “vertical” competition: the power of suppliers
and power of buyers.
Perfect competition oligopoly duopoly monopoly
The strength of each of these competitive forces is determined by a number of key structural
variables, as shown below
Market level
At the market level, use a tool to generate information about the part of the food industry in
which your business will compete in Toronto Canada . This tool might be in the form of a set of
questions designed to uncover information that you need to know to help develop plans to
improve the success of your proposed venture.
Prior to a new business start-up, the customers that the new business wishes to attract either
already purchase the product or service from a competitor to the new business—or they do not
yet purchase the product or service at all. A new venture’s customers, therefore, must come from
one of two sources: they must a) be attracted away from existing (direct) competitors or b) be
convinced to make different choices about where they spend their money so they purchase the
new venture’s product or service instead of spending their money in other ways (with indirect
competitors). An entrepreneur must decide from which source they will attract their customers,
and how they will do so. They must understand the competitive environment.
Using an appropriate method like a market profile analysis to assess the position within the
industry in which you expect to operate.
In what way are competitors expected to respond if you enter the market?
What is the current size of the market and how large is it expected to be?
At what stage of the development cycle is the market on food from africa?
What proportion of the market can be captured? What will be the cost to capture this proportion
and what is the cost to capture the proportion required for business sustainability
According to Porter (1996), strategy is about doing different things than competitors or doing
similar things but in different ways. To develop an effective strategy, an entrepreneur must
understand the competition.
At a firm level, both the internal organizational trends and the external market profile trends
should both of food supply to both Africans and foreign nationals analyzed. There are several
tools for conducting an internal organizational analysis, and normally you should normally apply
several of them.
There are several tools available for firm-level analysis, and usually several of them should be
applied because they serve different purposes.
A strength and weakness analysis was undertaken for three dish types, namely meat,
vegetable and dairy dishes with a view to determine the strengths, and weaknesses of
the ethnic cuisine and perceived improvement requirements to enhance
Internationalization
Core competency
For any organization, its core competency refers to the capabilities, knowledge, skills and
resources that constitute its "defining strength." A company's core competency is distinct, and
therefore not easily replicated by other organizations, whether they're existing competitors or
new entrants into its market.
Alexander and Martin (2013) state that the competitiveness of a company is based on the ability
to develop core competences. A core competence is, for example, a specialized knowledge,
technique, or skill. The core capability is the management ability to develop, out of the core
competences, core products and new business. Competence building is, therefore, an outcome of
strategic architecture which must be enforced by top management in order to exploit its full
capacity.
Core competencies are related to a firm's product portfolio via core products. Prahalad and
Hamel (1990) defined core competencies as the engines for the development of core products
and services. Competencies are the roots of which the corporation grows, like a tree whose fruit
are end products.
Core products contribute "to the competitiveness of a wide range of end products. They are the
physical embodiment of core competencies." Approaches for identifying product portfolios with
respect to core competencies and vice versa have been developed in recent years. One approach
for identifying core competencies with respect to a product portfolio has been proposed by
Danilovic & Leisner (2007)
core competencies can also be skills and abilities. We’ll get into some real-life examples of
business core competencies that aren’t products and services in just a bit, but first, here’s a list of
common core competencies:
Every skill someone lists on their résumé is a personal core competency, and chances are good
that when you identify a job applicant with personal core competencies matching your
organizational goals, you’ll move them to the top of the list. Here are some examples of common
personal core competencies:
Strategic planning
Excellent organization skills
Leadership and personnel management
Project management
Attention to detail
Founder fit
Founder-market fit is an innate, unfair advantage that sets founders apart from their competitors.
Accelerators and Early Stage VCs often look for it when evaluating founders for potential
investments.
Summary
References
Danilovic, M., & Leisner, P. (2007). "Analyzing core competence and core products for
developing agile and adaptable corporation." In Proceedings of the 9th Dependency Structure
Matrix (DSM) International Conference, 16–18, Munich, Germany
Prahalad, C.; Hamel, G. (1990). "The core competence of the corporation". Harvard Business
Review. 68: 79–91.