Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Part II (CJ MARK D. SAÑEZ)
Part II (CJ MARK D. SAÑEZ)
1. Create a dataset for your variables to answer your objectives using the corresponding
inferential statistics. Each data set must have at least 200 respondents or observations for each
variable.
2. Test your dataset for normality distribution. Screenshot the results and paste the results.
Discuss the initial results.
3. State the initial parameters such as sig-level and confidence interval. Treat your dataset with
appropriate inferential statistics and discuss.
4. Create your data analysis from the results of data treatment for each objective. Your data
analysis should consist of presentation of numerical presentation based on the results and
implications about the results and the variables involved.
5. Include the screenshot of the results and attached the datasets in excel format in your
submission for verifications of the statistical results.
6. Use the format below for the results and submit it in a document file format in the designated
section of the LMS.
Name:
The total number of items is 50. Each group have 50 participants or observations.
OBJECTIVES:
Is there a significant difference in the test results of between each group?
HYPOTHESIS (HO):
SIGNIFICANCE:
Sig-level = 0.05
CI = 0.95 = 95%
RESULTS:
* Results # 1 (Means)
ANOVA P-
value= .002632
INTERPRETATION:
HYPOTHESIS ( HO):
Sig-level= 0.05
CI = 0.95 = 95%
RESULTS
p-value= 0.49856
INTERPRETATION:
The Hypothesis in null form will not be accepted since the composed value is not significant at
p <.05. Therefore, there is significant difference in the mean scores of each test administration.
3. A science teacher wants to find which group of students performs better based on their summative
scores. The total number of items is 50. Each group have 50 participants or observations.
OBJECTIVES:
Is there a significant difference in the test results of between each group?
HYPOTHESIS (HO):
SIGNIFICANCE:
Sig-level = 0.05
CI = 0.95 = 95%
RESULTS:
* Results # 1 (Means)
* Results #2
ANOVA P-
value= .062593. The
result is not significant at
p <>0.5.
INTERPRETATION:
Hypothesis in null form wil notl be accepted, therefore there is significant difference in the performance
of each group. However, Group 4 is a best group because it earns a higher average than the others
whereas Group 1 is the least group just because it produces the lowest average among the five groups.