Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Economic Bulletin
FY2020/21
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
1. GLOBAL OUTLOOK
1.1. Global Growth
1.2. Global PMI
1.3. FAO Food Price Index (FFPI)
1.4. Global Oil Price
1.5. Global Inflation
1.6. Egypt Positioning on the Global and Regional Maps
2. ECONOMIC GROWTH
2.1. Real GDP FY 2020/21
2.2. Private Consumption
2.3. Government Expenditure
2.4. Investments
2.5. Imports & Exports
2.6. Sectoral Analysis
2.6.1. Suez Canal
2.6.2. Tourism
2.6.3. Agriculture
2.6.4. Manufacturing
2.6.5. Telecommunication
5. FISCAL SECTOR
5.1. Budget
5.1.1. Budget Revenues
5.1.2. Budget Expenditures
5.1.3. Budget Balance
5.2. Fiscal Multiplier
5.3. Fiscal Efficiency: Towards Alleviating Poverty
6. MONETARY BALANCES
6.1. Domestic Liquidity
6.2. Deposits
6.3. Credit Facilities
6.4. Interest Rates
6.5. Exchange Rates
6.6. Inflation
3
7. EXTERNAL SECTOR
7.1 External Debt
7.2 Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
7.3 Remittances
7.4 Net International Reserves (NIR)
8. NATIONAL STRUCTURAL REFORM PROGRAM
9. GREEN ECONOMY
CONCLUSION
1. Global Outlook
5
Source: IMF
Source: IMF
6
Source: Bloomberg
7
May-21
Nov-20
Apr-21
Jan-20
Mar-20
Jun-20
Oct-20
Aug-20
Jan-21
Mar-21
Jun-21
Feb-20
Jul-20
Sep-20
Feb-21
Source: FAO
8
Source: Nasdaq
9
1. Energy
The global energy crisis is represented by a shortage of coal supplies and a historic rise in the prices of electricity, coal
and liquefied gas. Energy prices continue to rise in the third quarter of 2021, after reaching 73 USD/barrel in June 2021.
Natural gas and coal prices are expected to rise in 2022 as well as demand growth slows and supply constraints ease.
Crude oil prices are expected to reach an average of 74 USD per barrel in 2022, but it remains high, increasing global
inflationary pressures and potentially shifting economic growth to energy exporters rather than energy importers.
4. Demand Recovery
Worldwide social distancing measures, starting in 2020, gave consumers fewer opportunities to spend money,
and lead people to save a larger amount of money. At the same time, governments introduced historic fiscal
stimulus packages that included tax breaks and direct payments. As a result, consumers have amassed large
reserves of savings: American consumers alone are sitting on $1.6 trillion in unspent cash. Increased demand
increases the costs of basic commodities, which in turn raises prices for consumers.
Source: IMF
10
1.6.5 Education
Egypt ranked 39th out of 78 countries in the US News ranking of the best countries
for education in 2021. The 2021 rankings are based on “a perception-based global
survey, which used a compilation of scores from three equally weighted country
attributes: having a well-developed public education system, whether people would
consider attending university there and if that country provides a top-quality
education.
1.6.6 Global Health Security Index
Egypt ranked 153rd out of 195 countries in the Global Health Security Index in 2021 and it positioned 33rd out of
54 countries in the African region. Despite COVID-19 outbreak, Egypt showed improvements in the scores in two
from the four pillars of the index: in Detect and Health with +0.6 and +2.3 respectively from 2019.
Globally Africa
12
2. ECONOMIC GROWTH
13
2.9%
2.0%
0.7%
2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22* 2022/23* 2023/24* Q1 2020/21 Q2 2020/21 Q3 2020/21 Q4 2020/21
Source: MPED Source: MPED
From the demand-side, although real GDP decelerated slightly to 3.3% during FY 2020/21, compared to 3.6% a
year earlier, Egypt’s real GDP growth rate is among the handful emerging economies. Household consumption is
in the front seats in terms of growth rate growing by 7.1% during FY 2020/21, compared to 7.3% a year earlier.
Both export and capital formation witnessed negative growth rate during the same year.
15.7 12.9
10.6 7.3 7.1
5.3 5.6 3.6 3.3 1.0 1.0 6.7 3.7
0.2 1.7 2.8
-2.2
-8.9 -7.5
-13.4
-17.9 -20.9 -21.7
GDP at Market Price Imports Household Government Capital Formation Exports
Consumption Consumption
By analyzing the sources of real GDP growth during 2020/21, it has been observed that the main contributor for
GDP growth was the household consumption with a share of 5.9 % compared to the same rate in FY 2019/20.
Nonetheless, both exports and capital formation contributed negatively during FY 2020/21, registering about -
1.9% and -1.0%, respectively. Despite this negative contribution, both exports and capital formation revealed a
significant rebound from the previous year.
As imports contribution inched up in FY 2020/21, reaching 0.1 % against -4.8% during FY 2019/20. The
government consumption’s contribution showed an approximately similar share in both periods. From the above,
it can be concluded that the private consumption has the biggest share in this year growth. As such, the sources
of growth are inflationary as the share of private consumption remains relatively higher in comparison to the
shares of the gross capital formation and net exports. This doesn’t necessarily reflect an improvement in the
household’s purchasing power because GDP real growth rate is still below the historical levels.
-0.4 -1.0
-1.9
-2.7
-3.8 -4.0
-4.8
2018/2017 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020-2021
Source: MPED
15
GDP per capita real growth rate declined in FY 2019/20 and 2020/21, reaching 1.2% down from 3.6% in
2019/18. This trend is resulted from the persistent increase of population, which emphasises the necessity of the
government to plan to control population growth rates, and maintain water and food security.
60,000
3.6% 3.5%
3.0%
50,000
2.5%
40,000
2.0%
30,000 1.8%
58,289
62,682
54,255 1.5%
46,089
20,000 37,956 39,322 40,012 1.2%40,478
1.0%
0.8%
10,000 0.5%
- 0.0%
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21
GDP per apita ( current prices) GDP per Capita (constant prices "2016/17=100")
GDP per Capita Real Growth rate
Source: MPED
Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2019/20 2020/21 2020/21 2020/21 2020/21
Source: MPED
18
2.4 Investment
Covid-19 repercussions have evidently hit Investment “Constant Prices” (LE bn)
investments in the last 2 years, as exhibited in chart
no. Since, it has registered a decline of about -20.9%
Covid-19 impact
in FY2019/20 Compared to the previous year. 693
Although, investments declined in FY2020/21, but It 613
530 548
has relatively recovered as the retreat rate accounted 506
for -8.5%. Thanks to the Egyptian government quick
actions facing the crisis to stimulate the economy
involving public investments injections along with
the stimulus package announced by the president of
EGP 100 bn.
Investment BNI
89
84
76
Source: MPED
19
The total investments executed during FY 2020/21 amounted to EGP 760.5 billion. The private sector
contributed with 26.3% compared to 73.7% for the public sector. Accordingly, the transportation and storage
sector had the largest share of total investments reaching 15.6% followed by services sector of about 12.1%.
The figure below presents the public and private sector investment shares of total investment in the economic
activities. The private sector is leading during FY 2020/21, as demonstrated, the wholesale and retail came first
with a share of 95% followed by restaurants and hotels (93%). Natural gas occupied the third place, then
followed by real estate activities. Pointing out that the 3 leading NSRP sectors were at the fifth, sixth and seventh
places whereas private investments share in communications and information technology accounted for
approximately the half, while the manufacturing and agriculture private sector share registered 36% and 26%
respectively.
Public and Private Sector Investment Share of total Investments by
Economic Activity in FY 2020/21
Wholesale and Retail Trade 95
Restaurants and Hotels 93
Natural Gas 83
Real Estate Activities 77
Communications 50
Information Technology 49
Other Manufacturing Industries 36
Agriculture, Irrigation and Land… 26
Construction 15
Health Services 13
Education Services 11
Transportation and storage 11
Other Services 10
Crude Oil 8
Electricity 7
Financial intermediation,…
Suez Canal
Sewage
Water
Petroleum refining
Other extractions
34.8 26.3
41.5 46.4 38.3
62.4 60.3 58.3 55.7 53.7
65.2 73.7
58.5 53.6 61.7
37.6 39.7 41.7 44.3 46.3
2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021
21
Source: MPED
`
22
Second: Number of New Established Companies
The number of new companies has been fluctuating throughout the months post- COVID’19 crisis till April
2021, apart from the trough emerged in April 2020. This was resulted from the state of global and national
uncertainty and ambiguity. Most of new companies are classified among the services sector by
approximately 55.5%. 19.5% are associated to the industry sector, following by construction sector by about
14.1%. Therefore, Egyptian government focuses on enhancing business environment as one of the NSRP
Fundamentals, as well as supporting SMEs.
During April 2021, capital flows in Egypt are mostly conceived by Egyptians registering 65.2%, following by
foreigners accounted for 21.7% and lastly Arabs as indicated in the chart below.
22
“More
trend declined again in December 2020 along with
the surge of Covid-19 cases then started to pick up
again in April 2021 till June 2021 as the
vaccination process expanded.
Quoting!”
Egypt's PMI during FY 2020/21
51.4
50.9
50.4
49.9
49.6 49.4 49.3
48.7 48.6
48.2 48.0
47.7
Source: IHS
Source: IHS
23
2.5 Import & Exports
Exports and Imports of Goods and Services at Constant Prices (LE bn)
1017 1125 1025
722 841 843
706
549 553 479
The quarterly data of exports highlights the impact of Imports of goods and services grew remarkably during
COVID-19 global crisis on exports volume starting FY2020/21 up to 32.6% in Q42020/21 compared to -
Q42019/20. As shown below, it remained below the pre- 24.7% in Q4 2020/21.
crisis levels. The good news is that the steady growth rates
observed during FY2020/21, switched from negative to Imports of Goods & Services
positive side to record 53.7% in Q42020/21. (Quarterly data, in EGP bn)
400 Covid-19 Crisis 80%
Exports of Goods & Services 60%
300
(Quarterly data, in EGP bn) 40%
Covid-19 Crisis 200 20%
300 150% 0%
100
100% -20%
200 50% 0 -40%
100 0% Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
-50%
0 -100% 2018/2017 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020-2021
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Imports of Goods & Services in EGP bn
2018/2017 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020-2021
Growth Rates of Imports (Y-o-Y)
Exports of Goods & Services in EGP bn
Growth Rates of Exports (Y-o-Y) Source: MPED
Source: MPED
24
Non-Petroleum exports CBE data revealed the recovery path of exports from COVID-19 repercussions. The figure
below showed the upward line of growth rates (Y-o-Y) reaching 49.4% in Q4 2020/21 and recording USD 8.1 bn
compared to 5.4 USD bn in the same quarter a year earlier, while it registered USD 20.1 bn during the whole FY
2020/21 versus USD 17.9 bn in FY 2019/20.
Moreover, figure xx reveals the evolution of both oil and non-oil exports, along with imports. Petroleum exports
increased by 1.4% to reach USD 8.6 bn during FY 2020/21. Petroleum imports slightly retreated to USD 8.6 bn
after registering USD 8.9 bn in 2019/20. Whereas other imports surged by 15.2% to reach USD 62.1 bn in 2020/21.
This rise has totally offset the retreated petroleum imports as well as the increased petroleum and non- petroleum
exports.
53.9
20.1
17.9
0.2
6.2 5.7 3.0
2.2
Non Petroleum Imports Petroleum Imports Non Petroleum Exports Petroleum Exports
Source: CBE Source: CBE
Referring to the sectoral distribution of merchandise exports and imports in June 2021, it can be observed that
food products share ranked first of total exports and imports, while garment exports came in second place,
followed by iron and steel.
0.01 0.05
Glass Glass
0.01 0.03
0.22
0.05 Garments
Garments 0.14
0.05
0.09
Textiles
0.26 0.07
Textiles
0.19
0.03
Pharmaceutics
0.02
0.28
Pharmaceutics
0.23 0.05
Cement
0.02
0.82
Food products 0.54
1.33 Food products
0.47
As shown in below, that intermediate goods constitute As for exports, finished commodities share accounted
the largest proportion of imports during the period of for about 46% during the period of January/June 2021,
January 2021 till June 2021, followed by non-durable fuel came in the second place with a percentage of 23%
consumer commodities then investment commodities. and then semi-manufactured commodities attributed
by 20.1%.
Percentage Distribution of
Imports by Usage Degree Percentage Distribution of
Exports by Usage Degree
Jan/jun'21 Jan/Jun'20
Jan/jun'21 Jan/Jun'20
0.0%
Electric Power
0.0% 0.2
Electric Power
0.2
Non Durable Consumer 17.7%
Commodities 19.4%
45.9
Finished Commodities
9.5% 42.9
Durable Consumer
Commodities 8.6%
Semi-manufactured 20.1
13.4% Commodities 27
Investment Commodities
13.5%
10.1
34.9% Raw Materials
Intermediate Commodities
37.0% 12.6
13.5% 0.7
Raw Materials Raw Cotton
13.1% 0.5
11.0%
Fuel 23
8.4% Fuel
16.8
The national supply and international demand for Egyptians exports in 2020
The following chart presents the intersection between international demand and Egyptian exports to the rest
of the world in 2020. It reflects the global market opportunities for Egypt, as it emphasizes the international
market gaps and the potential for Egypt to invest in the domestic production of goods that are highly demanded
internationally. Distinctly, electrical machinery and equipment as well as oil seeds are among the highest
internationally demanded products for which Egypt is net importer. In this context, Egyptian government is
working on achieving the structural reforms’ targets of optimizing the share of high and medium tech exports
of total manufacturing exports.
The National supply to the rest of the world (Egyptian exports) and international demand for
products exports by Egypt in 2020
0.6% 5.9
2.2% bn USD
5 1.8%
bn EGP
Nov-20
Dec-20
Apr-21
May-21
Jun-20
Oct-20
Jun-21
Aug-20
Jan-21
Mar-21
Jul-20
Sep-20
Feb-21
Source: Suez Canal Authority
Navigation statistics
during the FY2020/21
recorded a noticeable
increase in the number and
tonnage of ships transiting
the canal. Worth
mentioning, the total
passing ships during June
2021 reached 1656 ships
with ships’ cargo of 102.1
mn tons, increasing by
20% and 21% respectively
comparing to the total
Passing ships during June
2020, recording 1381 ships
Jun-21 Jun-20
with ships’ cargo of 84.2
mn tons. The credit goes to
the flexible marketing and
102.1
Ships Cargo(mn ton) pricing policies taken by
84.2 the authority to reduce the
negative impact of the
Corona virus crisis, as it
1263
No. of other Passing Ships succeeded in maintaining
982 the rates of vessel transit in
the canal and gaining the
confidence of customers.
393
No. of Passing Oil Tankers
399
2.6.2 Tourism
Tourism sector remains one of the most affected
sectors by the global Covid-19 current crisis. The
sector decline rate reached -27% in FY 2020/21
compared to the previous year. Touristic revenues
dropped by approximately 51% registering 4.9 USD
bn down from 9.9 USD bn in FY 2019/20.
6 -50.7%
bn EGP
53.3%
46.7%
Since the pandemic hit, countries around the world started to lock down totally or partially, controlling transportation
and travel besides mandating precautionary measures. Tourism and transportation sectors, particularly airlines were
tremendously affected. Number of tourists decayed by 71.6% in 2020 compared to 2019. Likewise, tourism revenues
dropped by 68.4% in only one year.
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Source: Ministry of Tourism, CAPMAS Source: Ministry of Tourism, CAPMAS
32
2.6.3 Agriculture
Agriculture is one of the main priority sectors in the
NSRP, it has the largest sectoral employment share
among other sectors.
11.5 20.3%
3.8%
%
Sector’s growth rate in Employment share in the
Sector’s share of real
FY2020/21 compared to sector in 2020 of total
GDP during FY2020/21.
FY2019/20. employment.
51.7 7.6%
bn EGP
Agriculture was affected as well by COVID-19 repercussions, notably the disruptions of global and regional
supply chains that impeded agricultural exportation. This impact appeared during the months of FY 2020/21
despite the relative rise witnessed by the end of 2020 and the start of 2021. By April 2021, agricultural exports
traced a downward trajectory until June 2021.
Agricultural Exports Evolution (in USD thousands)
500000 14
13
12.3 12
400000 11.6 11.1
10.1 10
300000 9.1
7.6 8
6 6.6 6
200000
4.6 4.3 4.7 4
100000
2
0 0
Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21
Total agricultural exports (in USD thousands) Percentage of Agricultral Exports of Total Exports
Source: CAPMAS, Monthly Bulletin of Foreign Trade
Implemented investments in the agriculture sector used to be dominated by the private sector till 2016/17.
Simultaneously, with the reform program bold measures that Egypt applied in late 2016 and 2017, public
investments were directed to the agriculture sector aiming at stimulating productivity and agricultural exports up
to FY 2020/21 where COVID-19 spillovers affecting the global and national economy, public investments
recorded 74.3% of total investments.
The Share of Public and Private Sector as % of Total Implemented
Investements in Agriculture
2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021
2.6.4 Manufacturing
Although manufacturing sector was not among
the sectors hardest hit by the crisis, as per the recent
data, the sector retreated by 6.5% in FY 2020/21
compared to FY 2019/20.
59.5 12.7%
bn EGP
Noting that the manufacturing index was clearly recovered as indicated in the chart below by the beginning of 2021,
reached 18.9% in May 2021, but then decreased to 12.7% in June 2021. This decline derived from the trough in the
wood and cork industry (except furniture) that decreased by -47.17% in June 2021 compared to June 2020, as well
as the other transport equipment manufacture that reduced by -67.8%.
Manufacturing Index Growth Rate (Y-o-Yx
18.9
16.2
12.7
7.0
-9.5
-15.3 -17.1 -15.3
-19.5 -18.9 -18.3 -19.0
Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21
Concerning the public and private share of total implemented investments in manufacturing sector, the latter used
to have the highest share till FY 2016/17. As far as Egypt has taken bold measures regarding liberalizing the
exchange rate, inflation rate reached unprecedented levels, the government intervened to boost the sector
productivity in FY 2017/18, up to FY 2020/21 with a share of 64.2% as the government’s target is to implement
radical structural reforms in the sector.
The Share of Public and Private Sector As % of Total Implemented
Investements in Manufacturing
Public Investments Private Investments
40% 36%
47% 48%
78% 79% 85%
87% 87% 94%
60% 64%
53% 52%
22% 21% 15%
13% 13% 6%
2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021
2.6.5 Telecommunication
Information and communication technology is the
highest growing sector in FY 2020/21, recording
16.1%. Since COVID-19 crisis, digitalization and
technology became the main feature of the world’s
post-crisis era.
30.5 125
bn EGP bn EGP
Egypt pursued the digital transformation path even before the pandemic and it is among the main policies of the
structural reforms program (NSRP) adopted by the government and launched in April 2021.
The figure below presents the GDP of the sector at constant prices in the last 4 years, it can be observed that the
sector’s GDP growth across the years reached 16.1% in FY 2020/21 (EGP 125.12 bn).
GDP of the ICT Sector at Constant Prices
140.00 125.15 17.0
16.7 16.5
120.00 107.76
16.1 16.0
100.00 93.51
80.15 15.5
80.00 15.2
15.0
60.00 14.5
14.1 14.0
40.00
13.5
20.00 13.0
0.00 12.5
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21
The private sector share of total ICT investments became greater over the years. In FY 2020/21, public sector
accounted for 50.5% after that Egypt injected investments to this sector in the framework of NSRP and its
digitization plan.
The Share of Public and Private Sector As % of Total Implemented
Investements in ICT
120%
100%
80%
50%
60% 84%
97% 97% 96% 92% 89% 90%
98% 97%
40%
50%
20%
14.1 29.5
First Half of 2020 First Half of 2021 First Half of 2020 First Half of 2021
Source: National Telecom Regulatory Authority (NTRA) Source: National Telecom Regulatory Authority (NTRA)
We pay
4%
Source: National Telecom Regulatory Authority (NTRA) Source: National Telecom Regulatory Authority (NTRA)
39
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Q1 2021 Q2
Source: CAMPAS, Q2 2021
Source: CAMPAS
41
Labor Force
28.5 mn
Unemployed Employed
2.3 mn 26.2 mn
Unemployment
Female rate 2020 Male
Unemployment Unemployment
rate 2020 7.9% rate 2020
17.7% 6%
Latest data of sectoral distribution of employed persons revealed
that agriculture sector had the largest proportion share of 19.2%
of total employed persons, constituting about 5.3 million
workers. Retail and wholesale sector ranked the second which
contributed by 15.3% of total employed, they accounted for
approximately 4.1 million workers. Construction and
manufacturing sector came afterwards, contributed by about
13.6% and 12.9%, respectively of total employed persons.
Whilst, economic activities that lost workers during Q2 2021
were construction sector reporting 88 thousand workers,
followed by agriculture (82 thousand workers), then education
losing 60 thousand workers. On the other hand, wholesale and
retail attracted 206 thousand workers in Q2 2021 followed by
water supply and drainage activity registering 65 thousand
workers.
42
The forecasts reveal that the unemployment rate will be on the downward trajectory over the upcoming three
fiscal years. This is fueled by a stronger economic growth during the same period that is estimated to be on
average 5.3%, 5.7% and 6.6% during the next couple of years. Such resilient economic activity is expected to
be associated with better performing unemployment rates that will be on average 6.6%, 5.4% and 4.2%.
43
2- Net-Hiring in SMEs
COVID-19 pandemic effect on SMEs net hiring was more severe and persistent than its effect on large companies
as illustrated below. The effect was sharply appeared in Q2 2020, when SMEs net hiring reached -24, followed by
another decrease in Q4 2020, which reflected the vulnerability of SMEs to external shocks. Unlike large companies,
SMEs recovery path didn’t follow a specific shape. Up to Q2 2021, SMEs net hiring is still in negative territory
recording -6.
Net Hiring- SMEs
Capital
46
One interesting observation is that starting from Q3 2016/17, TFP has inched up to unprecedented levels, wherein
growth rate of TFP registered a 15-year peak of 4.3% during Q3 2018/19. Knowing that TFP is the portion of growth
that is neither generated from labor nor capital, therefore, it is a product of better technology, coherent policies, and
human capital. Since after, TFP has plunged to the negative territory during the global pandemic, afterwards it
started to show a clear rebound during March-June 2021, although it is still hovering in the negative territory.
Quarterly Growth Rate in the Induced Inputs Productivity
(Y-o-Y)
(in percent)
4.00
2.00
0.00
-2.00
-4.00
-6.00
-8.00
These recent development in TFP growth rate are the results of less misallocation of resources in the economy and
better government institutions as part of the recent reform program adopted starting November 2016, in the
framework of the 3-year Extended Fund Facility by the IMF, along with the National Structural Reform Program
(NSRP).
47
5. Fiscal Sector
48
24.57%
14.71% 13.66%
5.64%
1.85% 3.56%
0
2015/2014 2016/2015 2017/2016 2018/2017 2019/2018 2020/2019 2021/2020
Source: MoF
The main engine of revenue growth is tax revenues, especially VAT, which is one of the most important indirect
taxes on which the general budget depends, which is taxes on public and private consumption, meaning that
everyone bears the same tax rate of 14% when buying. Private consumption is one of the most important demand-
side drivers of gross domestic product (GDP), which represents more than 80% of Egypt's gross domestic product
(GDP) during comparison years. Indirect taxes may affect consumption reduction, thereby reducing the supply side
of GDP and thus reducing direct taxes on commercial and industrial profits
20.59%
11.52%
10.08% 10.04%
4.54% 4.73%
Source: MoF
The Evolution of the Structure of Public Expenditures (mn)
Source: MoF
50
14,175
-56,155
-75,101 -82,720
Source: MoF
-459,294 2020/2019
14.22% 13.55%
-427,960 2019/2018
-268,109 2015/2014
It is noted that the increase in the indirect tax receipts during the comparative years, has led to higher rates of
growth in public revenues. It is recommended to accelerate the development of legislative amendments to the
system of indirect taxes, especially Value Added Tax, as it is related to consumption, where the increase in private
consumption, which represents more than 80% of the demand side of the domestic product, increases the supply
side of the domestic product, which leads to an increase in the profits of commercial and industrial companies.
It is also important to consolidate local manufacturing competitiveness and support the local product promotion
initiative through the establishment of a risk Support Fund. This will lead to a GDP growth rate increase and rise
in the real income of individuals by reducing the fixed cost of the final product. This will lower the price of the
final product, leading to a competitive presence of the local product and providing new job opportunities.
Generally, fiscal multiplier is defined as the ratio of a change in output (ΔY) to a discretionary change in
government spending (ΔG). The fiscal multiplier basically measures the short-run effect.
In order understand the time horizon of the fiscal multiplier in Egypt, empirical evidence indicates that the short-
run impact multiplier, (which is usually defined as the multiplier in the first quarter following the change in
spending) is very low. However, the impact of 1% shock in government spending materializes in the medium- to
long-terms and increases gradually over time to register about 0.30 after 5 years. Moreover, the long-run multiplier
reaches its full impact of 0.47 after 10 years of the policy change.
Another VAR model specification has been implemented because the impact of the public spending on GDP was
diluted by including more macro-variables. Thus, a Bi-variate VAR was estimated, and the following has been
concluded:
- The short-run impact multiplier, which is usually defined as the multiplier in the first quarter following the
change in spending in very low.
- However, the impact of a 1% shock in government spending materializes in the medium- to long-terms and
increases gradually over time to register 0.50 after 5 years.
- Moreover, the long-run multiplier reaches its full impact of 0.82 after 10 years of the policy change.
The second VAR model gives more reasonable result, because according to the multiple regression, it has been
estimated that the long-run impact of public spending on GDP is 0.91, which has been underestimated by the first
VAR model.
However, the long run impact of the second VAR (after 40 quarters or equivalently after 10 years), is estimated to
be 0.82, which is close to 0.91 estimated coefficient.
Accumulated Response of GDP to
Accumulated Response of GDP to Government Shock (in%) – VAR2
Government Shock 0.47
(in percent) - VAR1 0.43
0.38
0.33
0.28
0.22
0.16
0.09
0.02
1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Source: MPED Source: MPED
Quarters
52
GDP_FC Trend Cy c le
According to the literature, the impact of government spending on real GDP is highly sensitive to the phase of the
economic cycle; the multiplier is relatively larger during an economic downturn and the recession period as the
economy witnessed a negative output gap.
It is crucial to highlight that the time scope used to study this empirical relationship has witnessed serious economic
shocks and policy fluctuations such as the economic downturn resulted from the spillovers of COVID-19, that has
put the economic growth on the downward trajectory especially during 2020 and the adoption of the reform program
supported by the IMF in 2016 till 2018 accompanied by important economic decisions such as the exchange rate
liberalization.
During these economic recessions and prudent measures, the government’s role is to intervene economically to boost
growth, through stimulus packages and higher government expenditures, to increase GDP, which is reflected in
higher magnitude of fiscal multiplier, especially in the long-run. Therefore, this coefficient estimated at a range of
0.82 - 0.91 reflecting the government’s impact on GDP during economic recessions.
The objective of the analysis is to provide evidence-based answers to the effective policies that the government can
use to target poverty in Egypt. The analysis entails the effectiveness of government spending on health, education,
and construction. In addition, scenario-based examination will be applied.
Methodology
▪ In analyzing the impact of the public spending on the outcome, it is resorted to the idea of input- output.
Some data points didn’t exist, an interpolation method was applied to have a continuous dataset. The time
spans from 2002/2003 through 2019/2020. The analysis was implemented twice: once using the public
expenditure and once utilizing the public investment spending.
▪ The impact on public investment on education is measured on the primary school enrollment, secondary
school enrollment and tertiary school enrollment. In doing so, an education index was calculated
including the three indicators obtained from the World Development Indicators (WDIs).
▪ Similarly, for health, the impact of the public investment on health is measured on four indicators: life
expectancy at birth, infant mortality rate, under-5 mortality rate and mortality caused from cancer and
diabetes for ages between 30-70.
▪ Moreover, investments in construction impact are measured in terms of the mortality caused by road
traffic injury
Main Findings:
▪ The expenditure on health and education, presents human capital formation which can make skilled labor force.
This skilled labor force can enhance the productivity of physical and human capital and in return it would have
positive impact on economic growth, via better Total Factor Productivity (TFP).
▪ Health expenditure is an important determinant of the health status and economic development of a nation.
Experience has revealed that countries which assign due recognition to this aspect have healthier and more
productive human capital.
▪ Due to discrepancies in data between the public expenditure and the public investments, it has been suggested to
apply the analysis twice to get more insights about the real effect of the expenditure/investment (input) on the
developments indicators (output).
▪ Empirical evidence revealed that public investment on education and health are still too modest and don’t exceed
0.4% and 0.3% to GDP, respectively. Moreover, the public expenditure on education and health registered 3.2%
and 1.5%. The government should proceed in its economic support for these key sectors to improve the human
capital and ensure a sustainable growth soon.
▪ Public spending on health is relatively shallow, nonetheless, with a coefficient that is typically both numerically
large and statistically significant at conventional levels. Estimated coefficients revealed that it pays off especially
in improving the infant and under-5 mortality years for each EGP 1 million spending on health.
▪ Moreover, it has a positive but relatively marginal impact on education with an estimated coefficient ranging
between 0.06 and 0.13 basis points improvement in the education index for each EGP 1 million spending on
education.
▪ The effect of the public spending on health has a modest impact on the chronic diseases like cancer and diabetes,
a conclusion suggests that a lot need to be done in this field to improve the health conditions of the Egyptians.
54
6. Monetary Sector
55
Domestic liquidity at the end of FY2020/21 has remarkably increased compared to the corresponding period
FY2019/20 by approximately 18.0%. Similarly, money supply and quasi-money inched up by approximately 16%
and 18.8%, respectively.
Compoments of Domestic Liquidity M2
(in mn EGP)
6.2 Deposits
In FY 2020/21, the total deposits increased by around 23.8% compared to the same period a year earlier. This rise
was driven by the increase in public and private sector deposits as well as households by approximately 8%, 16%
and 24% respectively between the end of FY 2020/21 and FY 2019/20.
Evolution in Total Deposits (in EGP mn)
Time and Saving Deposits Public business sector * Private business sector Household sector
Source: CBE
56
1553.4
1268.8
1038.2
881.1 819.6
706.9
574.077 549.5
337.5 436.3 235.84
406.7
1.312 1.3 1.3
Non-governmental private sector family sector external world sector governmental institutions
institutions
Source: CBE
SECTORAL SHARE OF CREDIT FACILITIES END OF JUNE 2021
Agriculture , 3.5
Services , 35.2
Industry , 43.5
Trade , 17.9
Source: CBE
57
Source: CBE
15.9
15.9
15.7
15.7 15.6 15.7 15.7 15.6
15.6 15.6 15.6 15.6
Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21
Source: CBE
58
6.6 Inflation
Recent Developments: Headline and Core Inflation
Urban headline inflation rate fell to 5.1% in June 2021 down from 5.6% in June 2020, recording a decline of about
0.5 percentage points. This came on the back of anchored inflation expectations and less volatile exchange rate
market. Meanwhile, core inflation rate inched up to 3.7% in June 2021 compared to 0.9% a year earlier. This was
due to the hike in the international food and oil prices that started to appear in response to the supply-chain disruptions
because of COVID-19 pandemic.
EVOLUTION OF CORE INFLATION (%)
4.0%
3.9% 3.8% 3.8%
3.6% 3.6% 3.7%
3.3% 3.4%
3.3%
0.8%
0.7%
Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21
Source: CBE
EVOLUTION OF HEADLINE INFLATION(%)
5.7%
5.4%
4.8% 4.9%
4.5% 4.5% 4.5%
4.2% 4.3%
4.1%
3.7%
3.4%
Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21
Source: CBE
59
Inflation forecasts
According to the baseline scenario, urban headline inflation will be maintained during FY2021/22 at a single
digit, backed by favorable base effect from the previous year albeit it inched up to register 6.04% during Q3
2021. This is attributed to:
▪ higher inflationary pressures due to the second-round effects of the fuel prices hikes
▪ higher international food prices that are partially transmitted to the domestic economy
▪ along with the positive money gaps induced from the domestic liquidity estimates.
▪ In addition, the inflationary contribution of the private consumption to real GDP growth rate during Q3
of FY 2020/21.
▪ Moreover, the exchange rate started to show minor depreciation since the beginning of September,
suggesting unfavorable pass-through effect.
For headline inflation, forecasted figures are on average ranging between 6.1% and 8.6% for FY2021/22.
Moreover, headline inflation is expected to inch up during Q2 FY 2021/22 to range between 5.4% and 8.4%
because of the increase in fuel prices first and second round effects, in addition to higher international food
prices. Since then, headline will be tamed out to hover around 6%-7%, within the target set by the CBE which
is 7% (+/-2%) to be met by Q4 2022.
It is worth to note that the forecasts for Q1 of FY2021/22 for core inflation came in line with the actual figures,
in which a core inflation is projected to be 4.4% while the actual figure materialized at 4.6%. As for headline
inflation, the forecasts came on the upper side wherein it is forecasted 8.6% for Q3 2021, while it registered
actually 6.0%, supported by the above-mentioned reasons.
However, the medium-term picture will be diversified if the international hikes of food and oil prices are
taken into consideration. Headline inflation is expected to reach a double digit of 14.9% by December 2021 that
would persist between 11.0% to 13.0% by December 2022.
Headline Inflation Forecasts Fan Chart Core Inflation Forecasts Fan Chart
(at 50% Confidence Level) (at 50% Confidence Level)
13.8 8.9
12.2 7.5
4.6
4.5 4.1 3.7
6.0 6.9 3.5
7.0 6.2 3.9
3.4
5.9 3.3
5.4 5.2 6.1 2.4
4.6 4.78 2.2
4.56 1.7 1.6
3.8
Jun-19
Jun-20
Jun-21
Jun-22
Dec-19
Dec-20
Dec-21
Mar-19
Sep-19
Mar-20
Sep-20
Mar-21
Sep-21
Mar-22
Jun-19
Jun-20
Jun-21
Jun-22
Dec-20
Dec-19
Dec-21
Mar-19
Sep-19
Mar-20
Sep-20
Mar-21
Sep-21
Mar-22
Source: MPED
Source: MPED
60
61
55.8
43.2 46.1 48.1
33.7 34.9 34.4
33.6 37.0 36.0 33.9 33.7 33.8 34.5 34.2
15.9 15.2 13.5 16.4 15.1 14.4 16.6
2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 20/21 20/21 20/21 20/21
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
External Debt ($ bn) External Debt/GDP (%) Safe Side (Medium) Safe Side (High)
Source: CBE
The external debt increased by the end of FY2020/21 to reach $137.86 bn, with an increase of 11.6% compared to
FY2019/20, during which external debt recorded $123.5 bn. Notably, Corona pandemic negatively affected the
performance of all economic sectors, leading to widening the funding gap and an increase in borrowing
applications made exceptionally to support the budget.
The ratio of external debt/GDP increased to reach 34.2% in June 2021 compared to 33.9% in June 2020 but still
within the safe limits (less than 40%), but it is necessary to be more conservative with the external borrowing, while
taking into consideration the new debt have to be long-term.
The figure below indicates the External Debt Structure according to the Due
improvement and stability of the external Date
debt structure according to the original
maturity in June 2021 compared to June Long-term Debt Short-term Debt
2020. The reliance on medium and long-
term external debt increased according to
the original repayment deadlines, 2020/21 90.1% 9.9%
reaching 90.1% of total external debt in
June 2021, and 89.8% in June 2020. This
reflects the government's reliance on
2019/20 89.8% 10.2%
medium- and long-term borrowing and
increased repayment periods to improve
the external debt structure, which in turn
Source: CBE
eases the pressure on the foreign Short-term External Debt / Net International
exchange resources to pay over longer Reserves (%)
39.2
periods. The ratio of short-term debt 33.8
according to the original repayment term 27.8 28.5
24.9
was 9. 9% in June 2021 compared
to10.2% in June 2020.
Bonds come in second place as the bond balance increased to $28.71bn in June 2021. While the relative weight of
bonds relative to the total external debt decreased to represent 20.82% by June 2021.
Deposits of Arab countries (Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Kuwait) come in third place according to
external borrowing financing sources, reaching $21.93 bn in June 2021, representing 15.9% of the total external
debt.
15.5
14.3 14.4
13.9 11.9
25.6
12.4 9.5
27.9
9.7 6.0
4.1 28.0
26.6
30.3
82.4
69.4
57.3
47.6
34.9
Looking at the figure above, notably, the debt structure stability according to the beneficiaries through FY2020/21
compared to FY2019/20, where the government continued to be the largest beneficiary by 60%, with about $82.4
bn. The Central Bank comes in second place with a 19% of the external debt, signaling a decrease compared to the
previous fiscal year, as it received $25.6 bn. While the banking sector came in third place with a 10% of the external
debt, signaling an increase from the previous fiscal year to record $14.4 bn.
63
17.2
15.8
13.3 13.5
13.2 11.7
11.1 10.2
7.3
6.1
3.3 4.0 4.2
1.2 2.2
Interest (paid) # Principal (repaid) Total Debt Service (during the period)
Source: CBE
$ 1272.9
June 2021
64
Net FDI breakdown ($bn) The decline in the value of net foreign direct investment inflows
during the fiscal year 2020/21 was a result of the sharp decline in net
7.5
foreign investments in the petroleum sector, which amounted to
5.2 negative $1.2 bn, with a decrease of 200% compared to the
FY2019/20. However, the net foreign investments in the non-oil
6.3 6.4 sectors increased to reach $6.4 bn, with an increase of 1.6% compared
1.2
to the FY2019/20.
European union signaled the largest FDI inflows to Egypt followed
2019/20 -1.2
2020/21 by the Arab countries. FDI inflows from USA witnessed a 14%
increase reaching $1.6 bn, while decreased by 20.5% from Arab
Net FDI in Petrolum sector countries reaching $3.1 bn in the FY 2020/21.
Net FDI in Non-petrolum sector
Net FDI
Source: CBE
1.7 1.6
1.0 1.0 3.1 2.3
3.9
1.8 1.9
3.1
1.8
1.8 2.2 1.4 1.4 1.6
2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21
Source: CBE
65
0.5
construction
0.9
FY 2020/21 witnessed an increase in
the FDI inflows to services &
manufacturing sectors by 4.3% &
1.0 21% respectively, while the FDI
others
1.1 inflows declined at the petroleum &
construction sectors by 30% & 44%
respectively.
2.3
Manufacturing Although the decline in the petroleum
1.9 sector, yet it still acquires the largest
portion of the FDI inflows followed
by the services, manufacturing &
4.9 construction sectors.
Services
4.7
5.1
Petroleum
7.3
Source: CBE
Tourism,
0.1
Real
estate, 0.6
As services sector witnessed the second largest FDI Financial,
inflows through the FY2020/21, it is noticed that the ICT, 0.7 1.9
financial sector acquired the largest inflows portion by
signaling $1.9 bn while Tourism signaled the smallest
portion by only $0.1 bn.
others, 1.6
Source: CBE
66
7.3 Remittances
Remittances ($bn)
2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21
31.4
26.4 27.8
25.2
.1 21.8
Source: CBE
Remittances from Egyptians abroad recorded the highest record during the FY2020/21, increased by
more than 13% to reach $31.4 bn, compared to $27.8 bn in the FY2019/20. Inflows have held up
well during the pandemic, remittances have ignored COVID-19 lockdowns and global oil prices have
soared.
While analyzing the reasons behind the remittances increase during the pandemic year, we find out:
Remittances of Egyptian
workers were not affected
by the pandemic except An 11% increase followed
during the fourth quarter in the following month and
of the FY2019/20, when remittances returned to
almost all countries of the strong performance in the
world implemented total following quarters.
and partial closure
procedures, so remittances
decreased by about 10%
on an annual basis, to
reach then $6.2 bn.
67
The recent increase in the rate of inflation, which made workers abroad
increase the value of their remittances as a kind of support for their
families.
68
Egypt's net international reserves reached $40.6 bn by the end of June 2021, compared to $38.2 bn by the end of
June 2020. Egypt's net international reserves have increased since June 2020, by about $2.4 bn, after it witnessed a
decline from a historical level recorded at $45.5 bn in February 2020, due to the repercussions of the global crisis
of the Corona virus pandemic.
The current NIR covers about 6.9 months of Egyptian imported goods, which is higher than the global average of
about 3 months. Egypt's net international reserves is a key indicator that expresses the power of the economy, and
the extent to which the country is able to cover its obligations, the external debt, and to meet different payments for
imports.
Since March 2020, foreign reserves have witnessed a remarkable decline for three consecutive months, in light of
the negative effects of the outbreak of the Coronavirus pandemic, and then NIR rose again for the thirteenth month
in a row, but still below the pre-Corona levels until now.
Despite the continuing crisis, as Egypt's obtained a quick loan from the International Monetary Fund worth $ 2.8
billion and the agreement on another $ 5 billion loan to be disbursed in installments helped support foreign exchange
reserves.
44.3 44.5
40.6
38.2
31.3
17.5
Source: CBE
69
8. National Structural
Reform Program
70
NSRP AS THE SECOND PHASE OF ECONOMIC REFORM PROGRAM
Building on the success of the implemented economic reform program, the Egyptian government announced
its Commitment to pursue this track of reforms by launching a 3-year National Structural Reform program
(NSRP), which is considered a second phase of the economic and social reform program that started in
November 2016.
The second phase of the program involves conducting structural reforms targeting the real sector through
implementing a comprehensive package of radical and well-targeted reforms at both structural and legal
levels and targeting the root causes of imbalances in the real sector and business environment in order to
encourage inclusive growth, create new job opportunities, diversify and develop production patterns,
improve the business climate, localize manufacturing, and enhance the competitiveness of Egypt’s
exports aiming at achieving sustainable and inclusive economic development.
Information and
Manufacturing Agriculture Communication
Technology (ICT)
The Main Pillar: Expanding the Relative Weight of the Following 3 Leading Sectors in the Egyptian Economy:
These leading sectors have been selected according to specific criteria:
▪ High Potential of Growth
▪ Relative Weight in the GDP
▪ Employability
▪ Sectoral Linkages
▪ International Competitiveness Advantage
▪ High Potential of Value-Added Generation
The targeted structural reforms include a set of policies that positively impact the aggregate supply side
to lay the groundwork for a long-term transformation toward an inclusive, resilient, and green economy
and covers more than one type of reform, such as:
Capital Market
Vocational Training Labour Market
Enhancement
Educational Sector
In order to ensure successful and fruitful implementation, the NSRP has been developed according to an
executive framework characterized by the following features:
▪ Dynamism
▪ Comprehensiveness
▪ Supportive Institutional Framework
▪ Evidence-Based
▪ Executive with Measurable KPIs
72
The
Government
Legislative
Performance
System
System
The
Demograp The reforming
hic System five main systems
and The
Population Logistical
Characteri System
stics
The
Financing
System
The total GDP contribution of the three productive sectors was 25.4% in FY 2020/21 while the targeted GDP
contribution of the three sectors in FY 2023/24 is targeted to range between 30-35.
73
• The NSRP Supreme Committee headed by the Prime Minister and the membership of all ministers, which
was formed by the PM decision.
• Established a high-level technical committee, which is responsible to monitor the program implementation
and coordinating between different authorities in charge of implementing the needed reforms, supervising
the implementation and the evaluation process as a whole, besides submitting periodic reports to the NSRP
Supreme Committee headed by the Prime Minister and the membership of all ministers.
• This is in addition to the formation of five working groups including members from all relevant ministries,
MPs, the private sector, ERADA initiative and independent experts covering the following fields:
➢ Enhancing the Business Environment and the Role of Private Sector along with the
Manufacturing and ICT Sectors
➢ Financial Inclusion
➢ Labor Market and TVET
➢ Governance and the Administrative and Institutional Reform
➢ Agriculture Sector
• The data collection from all involved entities comprising the dynamic use of a set of quantitative key
performance indicators
• Analyzing data and drawing conclusions
• Disseminated periodic reports on its progress
On the quantitative front, the estimated loss in GDP growth rate is estimated to be -0.58%
by 2050, compared to a loss of -0.61% by 2050 as estimated by the IMF as presented in
Kahn et al (2019). MAP in-house estimations are so close in magnitude to those presented
by the IMF especially during 2050.
On another note, a disaggregated analysis for crops covering the expected impact of
climate change on the agriculture sector in Egypt has been implemented. Three behavioral
models are estimated for wheat, corn and rice, and revealed that both wheat and rice will
be affected adversely by the climate changes registering a loss of 8.5% and 8.6% by 2030,
respectively and a loss of 9.7% and 11.7% by 2050, respectively. Nonetheless, corn
appears to be affected positively.
76
Given the impact on the yields of the main crops, it can be grasped that there will be a negative effect on the supply
of crops by 2050. This might put some inflationary pressures on the agriculture products and can push inflation rate
upwards.
It has been noted that policy space of central banks would be affected by an increasing likelihood of extreme weather
events, and it is expected that the increased likelihood would widen the uncertainty bands surrounding the long-term
inflation outlook. This could put upside risks on inflation and this situation needs the attention of the Central Bank
to such dynamics in the sense that CB should include the climate change among its medium-term inflation outlook
toolkit.
As such, it is observed that not only inflation is on the upward trajectory but also its uncertainty bands are
widening between the climate change scenario and the no-climate change scenario. In case of climate change
scenario, it ranges between 7.7% - 8.4% between 2021-2050, while it ranges between 8.1% - 8.3% with the no-
climate change scenario. Rising temperature and rainfall appeared empirically to have limited and marginal
negative net effect on agriculture.
productivity in Egypt. Moreover, it is not expected that it will be extremely sensitive to the climate changes soon as
estimated through year 2030. As per the World Bank Climate Change Knowledge Portal, the Egyptian crops yields
would not be affected severely by year 2050. These crops future yield compared to the baseline yield (1961-1990)
include best cereal (- 0.67%), maize (-0.41%), rice (0.81%), sorghum (0.72%), except wheat that will be adversely
affected by -16.3%.
On the national level, Egypt has taken pre-emptive and proactive steps to support the achievement of the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs) and to promote its adaptive capacity to climate change. As such, Egypt submitted its
Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) and Third National Communication (NC3) to the UNFCCC in 2016
which come in line with Egypt’s Sustainable Development Strategy and Egypt’s Vision 2030; providing the
guidance and policy goals for sustainable economic development and responsible environmental management to
meet climate change adaptation strategies and development priorities.
77
CONCLUSION
Covid-19 ongoing crisis has transformed the global economic landscape in many aspects since its spread in the
whole world as of early 2020. In this context, the report aims at tracing the economic developments in Egypt during
FY 2020/21 and elaborating on the real sector, fiscal sector, monetary sector, and external sector. In addition, it
sheds the light on how the bold steps that Egyptian government has taken facing the pandemic have helped in
mitigating its negative repercussions on Egyptian Economy compared to peers. Yet, the report considers also the
upcoming reformative measures which Egypt adopts within the framework of the National Structural Reform
Program (NSRP).
As for the real sector, the real GDP growth rate decelerated slightly to 3.3% during FY 2020/21, compared to
3.6% a year earlier. It’s worth to note that Egypt’s real GDP growth rate is among the handful emerging economies.
The main contributor for GDP growth was the household consumption with a share of 5.9 %, while, both exports
and capital formation contributed negatively during FY 2020/21, registering about -1.9% and -1.0%, respectively.
Despite this negative contribution, both exports and capital formation revealed a significant rebound from the
previous year. GDP per capita real growth rate declined in FY 2019/20 and 2020/21, reaching 1.2% down from
3.6% in 2019/18. Egypt BNI increased by 3 points in Q4 2020/21 recording 106 points up from 103 points last
quarter, marking a continued recovery for the economy. The business environment indicators during FY 20/21
showed that private sector share of total GDP at factor costs have been evolving over time, attaining 73.3 % in FY
2020/21 up from 72.6% a year earlier. Egypt’s PMI during the beginning of FY 2020/21, grew beyond the level of
50 for 3 months in a row, reflecting the recovery pattern of the non-oil sector following the Covid-19 outbreak.
Regarding the labour market and human capital during the FY 20/21, data indicated that unemployment rate
followed downward trajectory in recent years, starting from 2013 till 2020 reaching 8 %. Despite COVID-19 global
impact, unemployment in 2020 was approximately the same as 2019 (before COVID-19). This is due to the
Egyptian government insistence to face this crisis through a comprehensive package of coherent, well-structured
economic and social interventions that strengthened the ability of Egyptian economy to face external shocks.
The empirical evidence for production function and inputs productivity indicates that during recent years,
productivity of labor was on the upward trajectory. Meanwhile, productivity of capital shows stagnant pattern,
implying that the productivity of technology is fixed over time. However, total factor productivity (TFP) shows
some rebound to the pre-pandemic levels.
In fiscal sector, the growth rate of public revenues reached 13.66% in 2021 compared to 2020, which achieved a
growth rate of 3.56%. The total public expenditures in 2020/2021 amounted to EGP 1,578,774 million, with a
growth rate of 10.04%. This is due to the increase in spending on support and social benefits compared to
2019/2020. Whilst fiscal multiplier analysis revealed that the impact of 1% shock in government spending
materializes in the medium- to long-terms and increases gradually over time to register about 0.30 after 5 years.
Moreover, the long-run multiplier reaches its full impact of 0.47 after 10 years of the policy change.
As to the monetary balances, that latest figures demonstrated that domestic liquidity at the end of
FY2020/21 has remarkably increased compared to the corresponding period FY2019/20 by approximately
18.0%. The total deposits increased by around 23.8% in FY 20/21 compared to the same period a year earlier.
Credit facilities went up in June 2021 compared to June 2020 and June 2019. Governmental institutions credit
facilities surged by 101.5% in June 2021 versus June 2020.
78
Family sector came in the second place, growing by about 26%, followed by the private sector registering
approximately 25% and non-governmental institutions recorded 22.4%. Urban headline inflation rate fell to 5.1%
in June 2021 down from 5.6% in June 2020, recording a decline of about 0.5 percentage points. Meanwhile, core
inflation rate inched up to 3.7% in June 2021 compared to 0.9% a year earlier. For headline inflation, forecasted
figures are on average ranging between 6.1% and 8.6% for FY2021/22. Moreover, headline inflation is expected
to inch up during Q2 FY 2021/22 to range between 5.4% and 8.4%
Concerning external sector data, external debt increased by the end of FY2020/21 to reach $137.86 bn, with an
increase of 11.6% compared to FY2019/20, during which external debt recorded $123.5 bn. The ratio of external
debt/GDP increased to reach 34.2% in June 2021 compared to 33.9% in June 2020 but still within the safe limits
(less than 40%),
NSRP launched in late April 2021 is the Egyptian government plan to pursue a serious economic structural
reforms targeting the real sector through implementing a comprehensive package of radical and well-targeted
reforms at both structural and legal levels and targeting the root causes of imbalances in the real sector and business
environment in order to encourage inclusive growth, create new job opportunities, diversify and develop
production patterns, improve the business climate, localize manufacturing, and enhance the competitiveness of
Egypt’s exports aiming at achieving sustainable and inclusive economic development.
Green economy is among the strategic priorities of the government as it is the one of the human well-being
enablers and sustainability drivers. Hence, Egypt is moving forward to increase green investments. In
addition, the government submitted its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) and Third National
Communication (NC3) to the UNFCCC in 2016 which come in line with Egypt’s Sustainable Development
Strategy and Egypt’s Vision 2030; providing the guidance and policy goals for sustainable economic
development and responsible environmental management to meet climate change adaptation strategies and
development priorities. By testing the potential impact of climate change on the agriculture sector in Egypt, three
behavioral models are estimated for wheat, corn and rice, and revealed that both wheat and rice will be affected
adversely by the climate changes registering a loss of 8.5% and 8.6% by 2030, respectively and a loss of 9.7% and
11.7% by 2050, respectively. Nonetheless, corn appears to be affected positively.
Finally, as presented throughout the report, during 2020/2021, Egypt succeeds in accomplishing many
achievements despite the current situation of COVID-19 outbreak thanks to its bold measures and reforms
in light of the NSRF. It proved its existence between many other countries on the global and regional maps. It
ranked the 3rd among the 5 largest Arab economies in 2021. Egypt ranked 130 out of 178 countries in the
Economic Freedom Index 2021 with a score of 55.7, compared to 142 in 2020.
79
• Based on a restricted model, α = 0.62 and 1-α = 0.38, as such capital appears to be the main contributor to
growth during the period under investigation.
• To estimate fiscal multiplier, it is not a bi-variate relationship. Rather, the relationship entails some economic
interrelations by addressing a set of macroeconomic variables that can portrait the Egyptian economy.
• The utilized model includes the real GDP as the variable of interest being a function in real government
consumption, real exchange rate, treasury bill rate and the degree of economic openness. The data used in
estimation covers the period of 2001Q3 till 2020Q4.
• The methodology adopted a multiple regression to come up with the long-run estimated coefficients,
afterwards Structural Vector Auto-regression (SVAR) and impulse response functions are applied to get more
insights about the time horizon of the multiplier effect of a fiscal shock on the real output.