URGE SPEEDPOST/EWAR fe Assistant Labour Commissioner (Cental) 2” MS.0. Building (5 Floor) Nizam Palace. 2234/4, a.C, bose Road. kollats. Free; Industrial disput act, 1947- allege disput over termination of 58 watch and ward staffs at CPWD, IBB Zone, Nadia. W.B. raised by Ms. Dola Sen, the Hon'ble Member of Parliament (RS). ies; Minutes F (No 8/31/2021/E-3 dated 31.05.2022 and FINo! 8°32/2021/E-8 dated 14.10.2022 wera, ‘With reference to the subject referred above and miutes of the meeting held on 14.10.2022 at your good office the ara wise reply are furnished below. : © 4. This office did not case any contract work (where any workers were employed) before schedule completion lf the contract. Thus question of getting closure certificate of contract works from Dy. CLC (C) Kolkats does not arise. _. 2. The matter pertains to Border Fencing Division-1V, Barasat. Ol contract works forthe splat periods was made to the respecte conrates works was closed before stipulated date of completion and payment to the agency for the eto the respective contractors the question of further ful and final settlement ) Act does not arise. However, in fresh ‘agreement persons may decreased due rs is considered based on nominal wages for the respective categories and sidered In respective agreements based on the changed requi sment the CPW has to take action against the contractor If they violated any However, til date no complaint was received by the department from any per their work done as stipulated in the agreement. No, c ogc ERE 3 _marrare eter Sikaeune Pees ‘ir eadaien-w Border Fasting Dividon - VII Tes pean cn ey fe. vans dant, Coxsmaze Mo ? Soryiahoteoy FF Phone: 03482275597 ee ee ——— $e emo mesos? cmt ‘ [sree * 59(8) (Labour Caso), af he Vd 20221 11 3-fS Rete ozawa | nt oF "earPg2) 6. CPYD in each meeting hed in your offlos and in several correspondences intimated you that no action was, ‘taken by the department against the land of law. This is for your tand information please. verre Ae 0 or arenas ater fer eet Hat - VIL siafate 1. The Chie Engineer, 1BBZ-1, CPWD, Nirman Bhawan Matigara, Siiguri-10 along wits the referred minutes of the meeting dated 14.10.2022 for kind information please. 2, The Superintending Engineer, BFC-II, 1882, CPWD, Krishnanagar, Nadia along with the referred ‘minutes of the meeting dated 14.10.2022 for kind information please.Elle No- W32/202E-3 Bille Nowe 3 2021/83, Dae HN0/2022 Parties present On behalf CPW side Sh. Moushakhi Chakraborti (Assistant Enyheer) Ranjai Chakraborty (Executive Engineer) On behalf of Contractors oe ay Al ndia CPWD (MRM) Karmnehori Sangathan (21) Ms. Dola Sen, Hon'ble M.D. (1 ‘abha), INTTUC chairman Sh. Chanchal Chaudhary (Regional Sect) Sh. Ninnal Biswas (chairman IBB Majdoor union) Today-Hon’ble M.P, Dola Sen (Rajya Sabla)wasappeared on behalf of the Union. Hon‘ble MP, raised following issues to redressed by the CPWD immediately. 1. CPWD must get the closure certificate of the contract work (where affected workers svere employed) of their divisions in Murshidabad (division VIl), Nadia (division V2. ‘and Siliguri (division 11) from the office of the Dy. CLC (C) Kolkata 2. CPWD has also closed the Barasai(division IV) without obtaining the closuce certificate of contract work from the central labour department, Here, CPWD must ly pet a certificate of closure from the Inbour department. ntract work must be reported to the office of the Dy, CLC (C) Kolkara, i istation until ing closure permission from the office of the Dy. CLC (C) Kolkata to te i ler consider the Lull and final settlement by the workers that they have ‘been ree a less salary since previously they were vaming a higher salary, The union cso “classification was abruptly altered from skilled to unskilled vas was previously done, the salary must be streanalined is required to abide by the spirit of the nation’s laws. lerable time, but it is uot yet prepared toFile No- 832/2021/8-3, File No-8/31/2021/8-3 Date ~ 14/10/2022 The CPWD representative ¥ submitted! that they would get the permission of their higher authority to implement the Above points in their respective divisions. $e ‘The Conciliation Officer has already given sulficien time for both partis to be head ‘Therefore, the principal employer advised that this matter be given urgent priority s0 ia ze ‘might be resolved by the next proceeding, A separate letter will be issued to higher ey or decision making authority on behalf of the CPWD to be appeared in the next procen ‘Next date of conciliation fixed on 04.11.2022 at 3.30 P.M. Management ae Union /workers ] % Bere Ar Nizewad ihoned (Fx Sonar) er he ieh fe Brat Hy] 1022. cence