Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Felicity Acquah
Published by the Institute of African Studies, University of Ghana, P. O. Box LG73, Legon, Accra - Ghana
WELCOME ADDRESS BY
PROFESSOR AKOSUA ADOMAKO AMPOFO, DIRECTOR, IAS
It gives me great pleasure to make some brief comments on the fourth lecture in the
series of annual AngloGold Ashanti Lectures on Business in Africa, three of which
have taken place during my tenure as Director. I am particularly pleased because this
lecture was delivered by an eminent woman—Mrs. Felicity Acquah. Felicity Acquah
is an accomplished entrepreneur, and former Chief Executive of Eximguaranty
Company Ghana Limited. Her lecture, “Microfinance: its evolution and impact on the
economic development and growth of emerging economies over the past three decades
– lessons for Ghana and Africa” remains topical as so many SMEs continue to
struggle to survive despite the vibrancy of African businesses. While microfinance is
now a common feature of our socio-economic landscape, people are less familiar with
the evolution, prospects and challenges of the sector in Ghana. Acquah proposes that
microfinance should be promoted as a human rights institution to assist low income
and poor families.
We continue to enjoy our relationship with Annual AngloGold Ashanti (AGA) who
support the annual lecture, a significant event on the University’s calendar. The series
was instituted in 2009 following the establishment of the Kwame Nkrumah Chair in
African Studies, also supported by AGA, which was established in 2007 in honour of
Ghana’s first President, Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah, for his significant intellectual
contributions to African thought and to promote research, teaching and outreach on
Africana Studies..
2 | IAS-AngloGold Ashanti (Ghana) Lecture on Business in Africa
It gives me great pleasure to make some brief comments on the fourth lecture in the
series of annual AngloGold Ashanti Lectures on Business in Africa, three of which
have taken place during my tenure as Director. I am particularly pleased because this
lecture was delivered by an eminent woman—Mrs. Felicity Acquah. Felicity Acquah
is an accomplished entrepreneur, and former Chief Executive of Eximguaranty
Company Ghana Limited. Her lecture, “Microfinance: its evolution and impact on the
economic development and growth of emerging economies over the past three decades
– lessons for Ghana and Africa” remains topical as so many SMEs continue to
struggle to survive despite the vibrancy of African businesses. While microfinance is
now a common feature of our socio-economic landscape, people are less familiar with
the evolution, prospects and challenges of the sector in Ghana. Acquah proposes that
microfinance should be promoted as a human rights institution to assist low income
and poor families.
We continue to enjoy our relationship with Annual AngloGold Ashanti (AGA) who
support the annual lecture, a significant event on the University’s calendar. The series
was instituted in 2009 following the establishment of the Kwame Nkrumah Chair in
African Studies, also supported by AGA, which was established in 2007 in honour of
Ghana’s first President, Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah, for his significant intellectual
contributions to African thought and to promote research, teaching and outreach on
Africana Studies.
3 | IAS-AngloGold Ashanti (Ghana) Lecture on Business in Africa
BRIEF PROFILE
With over 30 years of banking and business development experience, she has served
in senior positions in the Agricultural Development Bank, National Investment Bank,
Merchant Bank and Women’s World Banking. She served as Managing Director of
Eximguaranty Company (GH) Limited, a Finance House for ten years.
She pioneered and led the implementation of the Relationship Management Workshop
for Bankers between 1995 and 1997 for the benefit of the Agricultural Development
Bank, Merchant Bank Ghana Limited and Barclays Bank.
She won meritorious awards on the celebration of Empretec Ghana Foundation’s 10th
Anniversary. Ghana association of Women Entrepreneurs accorded her two awards for
her contribution to business development in the country, having led the conduct of
over 30 Entrepreneurship Workshops and over 40 Management Seminars for SMEs
in Ashanti; Greater Accra; Western and Northern Regions. She won an African
Leadership Award in 2005.
She was adjudged the Marketing Woman of the year 2006 by the Chartered Institute
of Marketing Ghana and is a fellow of the Chartered Institute of Bankers.
She was accorded the Ghana Women’s Excellence Award through the Ministry of
Women and Children’s Affairs in April 2012. An International NGO, GWIN awarded
her a medal and certificate at the innovative Women in Business; Workplace and
Leadership Awards ceremony in April 2012.
She had previously served on the Boards of: Food Research Institute; Gold Coast
Securities; Metropolitan and Allied Bank; National Board for Small Scale Industries;
4 | IAS-AngloGold Ashanti (Ghana) Lecture on Business in Africa
Women’s World Banking; Empretec Ghana Foundation; Ghana Education Trust Fund
(GETFund); Ghana Social Marketing Foundation (GSMF) the Chartered Institute of
Bankers, the Association of African Development Finance Institutions (AADFI) the
Guarantee Committee of the Guarantee Fund for West Africa (GARI) and
Eximguaranty Company (GH) Limited. She is currently serving on the Boards of the
Catholic Institute of Business and Technology (CIBT), and is the Vice President of the
Business Council of Africa (Ghana). She is a patron of FIDA (Ghana) and a patron of
Empretec Women’s Forum ( Accra Chapter).
She has two children.
5 | IAS-AngloGold Ashanti (Ghana) Lecture on Business in Africa
Abstract of Lecture
Microfinance has evolved over the past three decades as a microcredit delivery system
that often brings micro banking to the doorstep of low income earning people engaged
mainly in informal trade and agro-based business segments of economies. It gained
global recognition in 1983 when Nobel Prize was conferred on Professor Mohamed
Yunus for (i) contributing to the creation of the Grameen bank in Bangladesh and (ii)
creating a micro finance system that enabled many rural dwelling people, majority of
whom were poor women, to have access to banking services thereby improving the
value of their businesses and the well being of their families. One key objective of the
bank was to reverse the age old vicious cycle of low income, low savings, low
investment into a virtuous cycle of more income, more savings, more investment.
Over the past three decades, through the practice of microfinance, individuals and
businesses in both the formal and informal sectors have tripled turnovers, improved
quality of housing, facilitated access to education for school going children, and
empowered many women to operate businesses consistently to lessen their
dependency on husbands and families. The challenge remains for policy makers in
most African countries, particularly in Ghana, to promote the establishment of an
Apex Microfinance bank to exemplify policies, best practices and standards for the
industry. The application of such practice will trickle down to impact positively on
business growth, employment, education, housing, health and productivity generally
in the country.
Such an Apex Microfinance bank will constitute the Forum that can help improve on
policies and develop networking strategies and framework through collaboration with
the microcredit bodies, MDAs, Development Partners, the Central Bank of Ghana,
Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning and other Apex bodies of microfinance
associations.
The large informal sector will have to be properly defined and structured in order to
make future policies more relevant, and guide Microfinance operations in Ghana and
other African countries over the next decade.
6 | IAS-AngloGold Ashanti (Ghana) Lecture on Business in Africa
I deem myself most privileged to be here among this august audience to deliver the
2013 AngloGold Ashanti lecture on Business in Africa. I wish to thank the Institute of
African Studies for extending such an invitation to me.
Mr. Chairman, the statement made by Dr. Kwame Nkrumah in his speech delivered at
the opening of the Institute of African Studies on 25 th October 1963 that “the
magnitude of the changes taking place in Africa today is a positive index of the scale
and pace necessary for our social reconstruction”, is true today as it was then in the
early 1960s.
INTRODUCTION:
Section 46 of the Non Bank Financial Institutions Act, 2008 (Act 774) defines
Microfinance services as financial services provided by institutions, however
organized, whether as companies limited by liability or unlimited, Non- Governmental
Organizations, cooperatives or cooperative societies, rotating savings and credit
associations or groups, common bond institutions, self-help groups or associations
promoting self-help groups, providing loans not exceeding an amount determined by
the Bank to a single borrower whether directly to borrowers, contributors or members
or through intermediaries and whether accepting deposits from members or not.
The microfinance system was generally recognized by the world when economic
players assessed its effectiveness through the Grameen Bank which was initiated by
Professor Mohammed Yunus in 1976. A professor at the University of Chittogong,
Bangladesh, he launched a research project to examine the possibility of developing a
credit delivery system to provide banking services targeted to the rural poor. In
October 1983, the Grameen Bank Project was transformed into an independent bank
by Government legislation. The key objectives were to extend banking facilities to
poor men and women; eliminate the exploitation of the poor by money lenders; create
opportunities for self –employment for the vast majority of unemployed without
providing collateral securities; bring the disadvantaged, mostly the women from the
poorest households, within the fold of an organizational format which they could
understand and manage by themselves, and also to reverse the age-old vicious cycle of
low income; low savings; low investment into vicious cycle of low income injection
of credit; investment; more income; more savings. Today Grameen bank is owned by
the rural poor whom it serves. Borrowers of the bank own 90% of its shares while the
remaining 10% is owned by the Government through a Bangladeshi Government
ordinance of October 2, 1983.
Bankers Ron Grzywinski and Mary Houghton of Shore Bank, a community bank in
Chicago, USA, helped Yunus with the official incorporation under a grant from the
Ford Foundation. By the beginning of 2005, the bank had loaned over USD4.7 billion
and by the end of 2008, USD, 7.6 billion had been loaned to the poor through its
branches numbering over 2,100 in the country. The bank’s success inspired similar
8 | IAS-AngloGold Ashanti (Ghana) Lecture on Business in Africa
It is well known that the Grameen Bank is based on the voluntary formation of small
groups of five people to provide mutual morally binding group guarantees in lieu of
the collateral required by conventional banks. At the start only two members of a
group are allowed to apply for a loan. Depending on their performance in repayment,
the next two borrowers can apply, and subsequently the fifth member as well. The
assumption is that if individual borrowers are given access to credit, they will be able
to identify and engage in viable income generating activities – simple processing such
as paddy husking, fruit juice making, pottery, weaving and garment sewing, storage,
marketing and transport services. Women were initially given equal access to the
schemes and they proved to be reliable borrowers and astute entrepreneurs.
The operations of the bank are carried out by “Bicycle bankers” in branch units with
considerable delegated authority. The rigorous selection of borrowers and their
projects by the bank workers, the powerful peer pressure exerted on these individuals
by the groups and the structured repayment scheme contributed to the success of
Grameen. Under the scheme, there is provision for 5 percent of loans to be credited to
a group fund.
The success of this approach shows that a number of objections to the poor having
access to loans can be overcome if careful supervision and management are provided.
For example, it had earlier been thought that the poor would not be able to find
remunerative occupations. It was felt that the poor would not be able to repay loans.
In fact, repayment rates reached 97 per cent. It was considered that poor rural women
in particular were non bankable; in fact they accounted for 94 per cent of borrowers in
early 1992. It was thought that the poor could not save. Contrary to this widely held
view, savings by such clientele grew, to a large extent, at the same time. In fact group
savings have proven as successful as group lending and other innovative approaches,
such as:
There are many overlapping explanations why the Grameen model worked. Some
people have attributed the success to a number of factors, such as (i) the making of a
product that met client needs, (ii) development of relatively low cost delivery
mechanisms, and (iii) generation of resources that allowed survival and expansion.
The findings from Hulme and Mosley (1996) and Jain and Moore (2003) provide
other attributes for the success: namely, administrative efficiency; working with
groups; transferring transaction costs to clients; and standardized products and
procedures.
It is worth noting that the Grameen Bank has its critics too. According to a publication
by the Global Poverty Research Group, not everyone in Bangladesh and beyond is
happy with the “microfinance paradigm”. In some cases, the microfinance approach to
poverty alleviation has been criticized in terms of its focus on the market and poor
people’s financial liquidity rather than on the socio-economic structures that underlie
poverty. Others note that the very success of microfinance as an industry is based on
its failure to challenge the foundations of class structure and that the home-based self-
employed often emphasized by MFIs, limit the potential for people to escape poverty
and marginalization. Nevertheless, most of the critics nowadays focus on moving the
models forward and not discrediting the approach in general.
It is noteworthy that some of the objectives for the setup of the Grameen Bank
currently apply to Ghana and other African countries. It is generally accepted that the
microfinance boom in Asia and Africa has arisen out of the old communal lifestyle of
10 | IAS-AngloGold Ashanti (Ghana) Lecture on Business in Africa
lending monies to family members to operate micro business. This development has
resulted in Susu-collecting Companies, Savings and Loans Companies, Credit Unions
and Financial Non-Government organizations (FNGOs).
Mr. Chairman, the concept of microfinance is not new in Ghana. Traditionally, people
have saved with and taken small loans from individuals and groups within the context
of self-help to start businesses or farming ventures. Available evidence also suggests
that the first Credit Union in Africa was established in Northern Ghana in 1955 by
Canadian Catholic Missionaries, according to Ghana’s Ministry of Finance and
Economic Planning.
Phase one involved the provision of subsidized credit by Government starting in the
1950s when it was assumed that the lack of money was the ultimate hindrance to the
elimination of poverty.
Phase two comprised the provision of micro credit mainly through Non-Governmental
Organizations to the poor in the 1960s and 1970s. During this period sustainability
and financial self sufficiency were still not considered important.
Phase four covers the mainstreaming of microfinance and its institutions into the
financial services sector since the mid-1990s. The MFIs have consequently gained
importance and visibility.
(FNGOs) and cooperatives; (c) informal suppliers such as susu collectors and clubs,
rotating and accumulating savings and credit associations, traders, money lenders and
other individuals, and (d) public sector programmes that have developed financial and
non-financial services for their targeted clients.
Johnson Asiamah and Victor Osei (2007) of the Bank of Ghana argued that
microfinance can make significant contributions through several channels when
properly harnessed.1 It can promote higher investment for economic empowerment
which in turn will promote confidence and self esteem, particularly for the vulnerable.
They recommend that efforts must be geared towards the improvement of the
institutional capacity as well as the regulatory framework of the microfinance sector in
Ghana.
The Central Bank of Ghana has recognized the major impact of microfinance on the
economy by providing for its operations under the Non-Bank Financial Institutions
Act, 2008 (Act 774). Currently there are over 228 licensed institutions contributing a
capital of over GH¢407 million. The Ghana Association of Microfinance Institutions
however estimates that there could be over 1,000 entities in the system. The Secretary
of the Association of Microfinance Institution, Maxwell Adombila Akalaare, stated in
a recent article that a cumulative sum of GH¢ 940.17 million worth of deposits was
mobilized by 180 microfinance institutions.
Most Central Banks in the world have evolved regulatory systems to control the
operations of MFIs. In Ghana such Non Bank Institutions have been categorized into
four tiers, namely Tier One requiring a minimum capital of GH¢7.0 million, mostly
found with Rural Banks Finance Houses and Savings and Loans Companies; Tier Two
being required to raise and keep at least GH¢100,000 This has recently been reviewed
1
See Asiama, J. P. and Osei, V. (2007). Microfinance in Ghana: An Overview. Accra, Ghana:
Research Department, Bank of Ghana.
12 | IAS-AngloGold Ashanti (Ghana) Lecture on Business in Africa
to GH¢500,000 in order to contain the level of economic growth in the country. The
units are also allowed to take deposits. Tier Three consists of money lenders, allowed
to keep a minimum capital of GH¢ 60,000 as paid up capital and Tier Four consists of
susu-collecting companies who do not have any minimum paid up capital but can take
daily contributions and are required to do formal registration of the Groups and
contribute to an Insurance Fund to be set up by the Groups / Associations.
The demand for microfinance services all over the world has been on the increase and
is greatly impacting on the creation and growth of micro and small businesses. The
consistent growth in size and numbers of Micro Finance Institutions clearly exposes
the inability of Commercial Banks to satisfy the loan and credit requirements of most
businesses and individuals.
Mr. Chairman, the history of Women’s World Banking Ghana (WWBG) shows the
important role Ghanaian women played in the evolution of MFIs in Ghana in
particular. I hereby take this opportunity to recognize the invaluable contributions
made by Professor Florence Dolphyne, who chaired the council for over six years,
Mrs. Eleanor Arthur, Mrs. Dora Gordon, and Mrs. Engmann. I had the privilege of
working with the Group between 1999 and 2002. I wish to join my former colleague
Chief Executive Officers of WWBG - namely Madam Aba Quainoo, Mama Biana
(nee Mrs. Paulina Dzane) - and the current CEO, Mrs. Adwoa Annang, to pay tribute
to the founding mothers for their foresight and the brilliant work done.
The features of the micro banking Women’s World Banking of Ghana carried the
expected objectives of the original “Stitching to Promote Women’s World Banking”,
with its Head Office in New York, to,
However the link to some of the benchmarks set by WWB-International has not been
lost, and these include, among others:
Eight notable challenges, among others, confront the microfinance industry globally;
namely
In Ghana some of the main challenges facing MFIs include: (a) inadequate policy
guidelines for the subsector; (b) inappropriate approaches to microfinance delivery;
(c) inadequate enforcement of business rules and regulations specified under the Bank
of Ghana notice BG/GoV/SEC/2011/0; and (d) absence of a formal MFI coordinating
institution for all micro groups and finance institutions in the country.
Inadequate policy guidelines for the subsector - Between 1950 and 1980 the
subsector operated without specific policy guidelines and goals and this
partially accounts for slow growth of the sub-sector, and the apparent lack of
direction, fragmentation and lack of coordination. According to Asiamah and
Osei (2007), mentioned above, the constraints facing the subsector in 2007
included inappropriate institutional arrangements, inadequate capacities, lack
of coordination and collaboration, poor institutional linkages, inadequate
skills and professionalism and inadequate capital. This state of affairs has
however improved tremendously over the past five to ten years.
17 | IAS-AngloGold Ashanti (Ghana) Lecture on Business in Africa
Absence of a formal MFI coordinating institution for all micro groups and
finance institutions in the country – Currently the absence of a formal
institution mandated to coordinate activities of all umbrella associations, such
as GhamFin, Cooperative Council, etc. associated with microfinance is a
major gap. There is an urgent need for the establishment of a formal
institution that will be responsible for coordinating all activities associated
with micro-finance. There is also no existing national forum that provides a
platform for dialogue among stakeholders on policy, practicing and
regulatory issues of the sector. GhamFin, one of the key umbrella bodies for
microfinance in the country, needs to be strengthened. Their membership
does not include all practitioners and service providers resulting in the
fragmentation and inadequate collaboration between and among Ministries,
Departments and Agencies (MDAs); Metropolitan, Municipal and District
Assemblies (MMDAs); development partners; and end users.
Mr. Chairman, Microfinance can be as informal and local as money lending or loose
confederation of business people who lend to those who are in the community. Some
18 | IAS-AngloGold Ashanti (Ghana) Lecture on Business in Africa
influential global leaders in the Microfinance Industry include KIVA, Tontine system,
ACCION, and ROSCA.
KIVA represents micro funds accumulated from over five hundred not-for- profit
organizations that allow people to lend money via the internet to people in developing
economies through KIVA’s 191 field partners. KIVA Ghana is a microfinance NGO
that provides financial and social services to underserved urban communities in the
country. With five branches in Accra, the organization has a loan portfolio of over
US$1 million and about 9,300 active clients, including about 6,200 borrowers.
Tontine system is an investment plan for raising capital; each indigenous investor
pays a sum into the Tontine. Each investor then receives annual dividends on his
capital. As each investor dies, his or her share is reallocated among serving investors.
Each subscriber receives only dividends, the capital is never paid back. This was
initiated in the 17th and 18th Century. Strictly speaking, there are four different roles in
the transaction and they are as follows: (a) The government or corporate body which
organizes the scheme, receives the loans and manages the capital; (b) the subscribers
who provide the capital; (c) the shareholders who receive the annual dividends; and
(d) the nominee on whose lives the contracts are contingent.
ACCION – Accion Microfinance Bank Ltd. is one of the largest microfinance banks
in Nigeria with a capitalization of 1.7 billion Naira as at December 2012. Its
shareholders include three of the leading commercial banks in Nigeria (Citibank;
Zenith Bank and Ecobank); IFC; SME managers and Accion investments. Accion
Microfinance Bank Ltd (AMB) is a member of Accion International Network of
Microfinance Institutions with the mission of building a financially inclusive world by
giving people the financial tools they need to improve their lives. A world pioneer in
microfinance, it was founded as a community development organization in 1961 and
issued its first microloan in 1973 in Brazil. Over time, it has helped to build 63
microfinance institutions in 31 countries on four continents that are reaching millions
of clients.
the world. A typical Rosca works in the following manner: A group of individuals
meet together on a regular basis (once monthly or weekly) and contribute some fixed
amount of money, decided either mutually or by the leader of the ROSCA, into a ‘pot’
every time they meet. At the end of each meeting, one member of the group is selected
to receive the pot. This process continues till every member of the group receives the
pot of money once, after which the group is disbanded or restarted with different
members, different contributions and possibly different duration between subsequent
meetings.
Some strong Microfinance Institutions also float bonds to source funding as a means
to long term funding. Others raise funds through acceptance of fixed deposits from
individuals and corporate clients.
This categorization helps Governments know how many low income borrowers access
the product, their gender, growth over period, loans disbursed, repayment rate, etc.
20 | IAS-AngloGold Ashanti (Ghana) Lecture on Business in Africa
and somehow also defines the type of microfinance institutions that exist in all
emerging economies.
Some of the lessons learnt from microfinance and microcredit operations in emerging
economies are mainly drawn from the experience of the Grameen Bank, as earlier
mentioned, which informed the world of the effect of structured micro finance
delivery on low income groups and economic growth, even though they also had their
challenges.
Its relevance to Africa, where most sub-Saharan countries register substantial informal
market operations, registering “one man business” ownership, is still applicable.
Government and policy makers will need to recognize some of the features of the
Grameen Bank and use them to develop additional policies and systems such as
creating an umbrella Micro Finance Bank owned by Public/Private bodies to set the
standards and best practices for the industry and to ensure good effect on the
economies and eventually uplift the poor in business to the level of sustenance and
growth.
In the light of the submissions made in this address, I wish to recommend the
following for further consideration:
The product should come with both obligatory and voluntary savings’
programmes for the borrowers.
General loans are sometimes given through non-profit organizations or through
institutions owned primarily by the borrowers. If it is done through for-profit
institutions not owned by the borrowers, effort should be made to keep the
interest rate at a level which is close to a level commensurate with sustainability
of the programme rather than bringing attractive returns for investors.
The thumb – rule is always to keep the interest rate as close to the market rate
prevailing in the commercial banking sector as possible, without sacrificing
sustainability. In fixing the interest rate, market interest rate is taken as the
reference rate, rather than the money lenders’ rate. Reaching the poor is its non-
negotiable mission.
Reaching sustainability is a directional goal. It must reach sustainability as soon
as possible, so that it can expand its outreach without fund constraints.
An umbrella microfinance bank should be established. Such a bank should give
high priority to building social capital. This is promoted through formation of
groups and centres, developing leadership quality through formation of groups
and centre leaders, electing board members when the institution is owned by the
borrowers. Such groups give special emphasis on the formation of human capital
and concern for protecting the environment. It monitors children’s education,
provides scholarships and student loans for higher education. For formation of
human capital it makes efforts to bring technology, such as mobile phones, solar
power and provision of mechanical power to replace manual power.
Some sort of deposit insurance scheme could be attached to the licensing process
of Micro Finance Institutions.
Mr. Chairman, I believe Ghana can rise above the challenges raised and establish a
Microfinance Apex Bank to help lift the country from this poverty syndrome. The
Microfinance Apex Bank can be set up along the lines of the ARB Apex Bank with all
umbrella microfinance bodies having a stake in its ownership together with Ghana
Government. It could be best positioned as a public-private venture also involving
other interested bodies and individual collaborators in the public and private sectors.
Such a bank can do the following:
22 | IAS-AngloGold Ashanti (Ghana) Lecture on Business in Africa
Put in place the best practices and standards that will accommodate the
interest of its clients and the economy.
Serve as the standard for the multiple microfinance enterprises that are
springing up everywhere in Ghana.
Serve as the institution that will help define the informal sector and also
promote policies and objectives for the large informal sector in the country.
Promote capacity building activities for the numerous small micro-finance
businesses, licensed by the Central Bank.
Collaborate with the Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance and
Economic Planning to effectively enforce the business rules and regulations
for the microfinance sector within the Non Bank Financial Institutions Act,
2008 (Act 774).
Construct business start up profiles for the different kinds of typical viable
micro businesses prevalent in the economy to guide individuals, technicians,
graduates, etc. to initiate their own businesses.
Conduct continuous research into the design of new products and services
for the industry.
The premise for policy makers in Ghana and Africa is that the poor and low income
persons have skills which remain unutilized or underutilized. I therefore share in the
belief recently espoused by Grameen that poverty is not created by the poor; it is
created by the institutions and policies which surround them. In order to eliminate
poverty we need to make appropriate changes in the policies and institutions we have
and also create new ones. Charity is not an answer to poverty; it only helps poverty to
continue, and it creates dependency and takes away the individual’s initiative to break
through the wall of poverty. Unleashing of energy and creativity in each human being
is the answer to poverty.
References
ure
Professor Akosua Adomako Ampofo, Director, IAS, presenting a plaque to Mrs. Felicity
Acquah after her lecture. Looking on is Professor E. K Osam, Pro-Vice-Chancellor
(Academic and Student Affairs), University of Ghana, Legon, who chaired the event