Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REPORT
Abstract.........................................................................................................................1
CHAPTER1:INTRODUCTION..................................................................................1
1.1.Definitions............................................................................................................... 1
2.1.Introduction............................................................................................................ 7
2.1.1 Principles.......................................................................................................... 8
2.1.2 Applications..................................................................................................... 9
3.3. Conclusion............................................................................................................ 14
REFERENCES........................................................................................................... 15
TABLES
Table 1................................................................................................................................... 3
FIGURES
Figure 1.................................................................................................................................. 9
Abstract
The reported protein content of foods depends on the analytical method used for
determination, making a direct comparison between studies difficult. The aim of this study
was to examine and compare protein analytical methods, including Kjeldahl, Bradford, Lowry
methods. Some of these methods require extraction preceding analysis. The efficacy of
protein extraction differs depending on food matrices and thus extraction yield was
determined. Overall, most analytical methods overestimated the protein contents. The
inaccuracies were linked to indirect measurements, i.e., nitrogen determination and
subsequent conversion to protein, or interference from other chemical substances. Amino acid
analysis is the only protein analysis method where interfering substances do not affect the
results. Although there is potential for improvement in regards to the hydrolysis method, we
recommend that this method should be the preferred for food protein determination.
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Definitions
Based on the chemical nature, structure, shape and solubility, protein are classified as:
- Simple proteins: They are composed of only amino acid residue. On hydrolysis these
proteins yield only constituent amino acids. It is further divided into:
+ Fibrous protein: Keratin, Elastin, Collagen.
+ Globular protein: Albumin, Globulin, Glutelin, Histones
1
- Conjugated proteins: They are combined with non-protein moiety. Eg. Nucleoprotein,
Phosphoprotein, Lipoprotein, Metalloprotein etc.
- Derived proteins: They are derivatives or degraded products of simple and conjugated
proteins. They may be:
+ Primary derived protein: Proteans, Metaproteins, Coagulated proteins.
+ Secondary derived proteins: Proteosesn or albunoses, peptones, peptides.
The amount of protein in meals varies greatly. Animal-based foods and legumes are good
providers of protein. Table 1 shows the protein composition of a variety of foods.
2
1
1
Nielsen, S. S. (2017). Food Analysis (Fifth Mæhre, H., Dalheim, L., Edvinsen, G., Elvevoll,
E. and Jensen, I., 2018. Springer Publishing. Chapter 18 page 318
3
- Fibrillar proteins- These are thread-like or ellipsoidal in shape and occur generally in
animal muscles. Most of the studies regarding protein structure have been conducted
using these proteins. e.g., fibrinogen, myosin etc.
Molecular Weight
The proteins generally have large molecular weights ranging between 5 × 103 and 1 ×
106. It might be noted that the values of molecular weights of many proteins lie close to or
multiples of 35,000 and 70,000.
Colloidal Nature
Because of their giant size, the proteins exhibit many colloidal properties, such as; Their
diffusion rates are extremely slow and they may produce considerable light-scattering in
solution, thus resulting in visible turbidity (Tyndall effect).
Denaturation
Denaturation refers to the changes in the properties of a protein. In other words, it is the
loss of biologic activity. In many instances the process of denaturation is followed by
coagulation— a process where denatured protein molecules tend to form large aggregates
and to precipitate from solution.
Amphoteric Nature
Like amino acids, the proteins are amphoteric, i.e., they act as acids and alkalies both.
These migrate in an electric field and the direction of migration depends upon the net
charge possessed by the molecule. The net charge is influenced by the pH value. Each
protein has a fixed value of isoelectric point (pl) at which it will move in an electric field.
Solubility
The solubility of proteins is influenced by pH. Solubility is lowest at isoelectric point
and increases with increasing acidity or alkalinity. This is because when the protein
molecules exist as either cations or anions, repulsive forces between ions are high, since all
the molecules possess excess charges of the same sign. Thus, they will be more soluble
than in the isoelectric state.
4
Optical Activity
All protein solutions rotate the plane of polarized light to the left, i.e., these are
levoratotory.
5
Reaction with carbon disulfide: With carbon disulfide, 2-thio-5-thiazolidinone is produced
Divide the amount of protein evenly between meals. Most of us have a habit of eating a
lot of protein at the end of the day, which is absolutely not good for health. According to
nutritionists, you should evenly distribute protein in breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks. For
women, you should consume about 45g of protein per day, and for men, 55g. Distributing
protein intake evenly helps control hunger hormones, so you'll stay fuller longer and won't
have to snack. After exercising, in about 30 minutes, you need to add about 20-30g of protein
to help your body recover and reduce pain caused by exercise.
Don't just add protein. Protein is one of three important nutrients in the diet. However,
you also note that too much of any one nutrient is not good, all nutrients should be maintained
in balance. Therefore, if you consume too much protein, you will be at risk of acute or chronic
health conditions. For example, a lack of carbohydrates will cause you to feel tired,
light-headed, and have low blood sugar.
Add just the right amount of protein your body needs. According to nutritionists, you
should add 0.8g of protein/kg of body weight. However, you should also note that the amount
of protein you add will depend on many factors such as age, activity level and muscle weight.
Therefore, you should calculate the amount of protein consumed daily, and pay attention to
the consumption of carbohydrates and fats to be able to adjust your diet.
Not all proteins are created equal. Almost everyone assumes that all proteins are the
same, but this is a misconception. In fact, there are many types of proteins that differ in both
quality and amino acid content. Meat and fish are the two best sources of protein. The protein
6
content in meat has up to 9 essential amino acids for the body, but meat also contains a lot of
saturated fat. In contrast, fish is very high in protein and low in saturated fat. If you are a
vegetarian, you can also supplement protein by eating more lentils, quinoa, and hemp seeds.
Do not depend on protein supplements. Protein supplements may be the quickest and
easiest way to get amino acids. However, like protein foods, not all supplements are created
equal. The most popular supplement today is whey protein, which helps with muscle growth
and weight management. You should note that before using any functional food, you should
learn carefully about that product.
Proteins, together with carbohydrates and fats, play an important role in the formation and
maintenance of the human body and are the energy-giving components in the diet.
Furthermore, proteins have a variety of other roles in the body, including enzymatic activity
and the movement of nutrients and other biochemical molecules through cellular membranes.
Protein accessibility may be reduced due to food composition, food structure, or matrix,
and interactions between nutrients, resulting in an underestimate of protein quantity.
Furthermore, different approaches use different analytical principles to determine protein
content, which can be done directly or indirectly. When protein content is computed based on
amino acid residue analysis, it is known as direct protein determination. For example, after
determining the nitrogen content of a protein, or after chemical interactions with functional
groups within the protein, an indirect protein determination can be made.
2.2. Principles
The determination of nitrogen, peptide bonds, aromatic amino acids, dye-binding capacity,
ultraviolet absorptivity of proteins, and light scattering properties are among the core concepts
of these approaches. What is actually being measured must be considered in the selection of
an acceptable method for a given application, in addition to factors such as sensitivity,
accuracy, precision, speed, and cost of analysis.
7
2.2.1. Kjeldahl Method
Proteins and other organic food components in a sample are digested with sulfuric acid
in the presence of catalysts in the Kjeldahl method. Ammonium sulfate is formed from the
total organic nitrogen. The digest is alkalized and distilled to produce a boric acid solution.
The generated borate anions are titrated with standardized acid, which in the sample is
transformed to nitrogen. Because nitrogen comes from non protein components, the result
of the analysis shows the food's crude protein content (note that the Kjeldahl method also
measures nitrogen in any ammonia and ammonium sulfate).Proteins and other organic food
components in a sample are digested with sulfuric acid in the presence of catalysts in the
Kjeldahl method. Ammonium sulfate is formed from the total organic nitrogen. The digest
is alkalized and distilled to produce a boric acid solution. The generated borate anions are
titrated with standardized acid, which in the sample is transformed to nitrogen. Because
nitrogen comes from non protein components, the result of the analysis shows the food's
crude protein content (note that the Kjeldahl method also measures nitrogen in any
ammonia and ammonium sulfate).
The hue of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 changes from reddish to bluish as it binds to
protein, and the dye's absorption maximum shifts from 465 to 595 nm. The sample's
protein concentration is proportional to the change in absorbance at 595 nm. The Bradford
method, like other dye-binding methods, relies on the amphoteric property of proteins. The
dye added binds electrostatically when the protein-containing solution is acidified to a pH
less than the isoelectric point of the protein(s) of interest. The dye molecule's hydrophobic
interaction with the polypeptide backbone adjacent to positively charged sites in the
protein improves binding effectiveness. In the Bradford method, the dye bound to protein
has a different absorbance spectrum than the dye that isn't bound to protein.
The Lowry method combines the biuret reaction with tyrosine and tryptophan residues
in the proteins reducing the Folin-Ciocalteu phenol reagent
(phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid) by tyrosine and tryptophan residues in the
proteins in figure 1. The generated bluish color is measured at 750 nm (high sensitivity for
low protein concentration) or 500 nm (low sensitivity for high protein concentration) (low
sensitivity for high protein concentration). Miller and Hartree updated the original
8
approach to increase the linearity of the color response to protein concentration and to
eliminate the use of two unstable reagents in favor of one stable reagent.
Figure 1: slide chains of amino acids tyrosine (a) and tryptophan (b)
2.3. Applications
Protein content in worts and beer products, as well as potato tubers, has been
determined using the Bradford method. This method has been improved to measure protein
levels in micrograms. The Bradford method has been widely utilized for the examination
of low quantities of proteins and enzymes in their purification and characterizations
because of its speed, sensitivity, and less interference than the Lowry approach. For better
compatibility with buffers and conditions typically employed in protein isolation,
improved Coomassie dye-based protein assays based on the Bradford method have been
developed.
2
Nielsen, S. S. (2017). Food Analysis (Fifth Mæhre, H., Dalheim, L., Edvinsen, G., Elvevoll,
E. and Jensen, I., 2018. Springer Publishing. Chapter 18 page 324
9
2.3.3. Lowry Method
The Lowry method is widely used in protein biochemistry because of its simplicity and
sensitivity. However, without first removing the proteins from the food combination, it has
not been widely employed to determine proteins in food systems.
Solid foods are pulverized fine enough to pass through a 20-mesh sieve. Analytical
samples should be homogenous. There are no additional preparations necessary.
The size of a sample required for chemical analysis is usually very small (10mg-1500mg)
Step 1. Turn on the Genova and allow it to warm up. See below for set up instructions.
Step 2. Gently mix the Bradford reagent and bring to room temperature.
Step 3. Prepare a series of protein standards ranging in concentration from 0.1 to 1.5mg/ml
such that the final volume for the assay is 0.1ml. Note that the Genova can accept up to 6
standards, not including the blank.
Step 4. Prepare the unknown samples in a similar way such that the final volume is 0.1ml.
Step 5. Add 3.0ml of Bradford reagent to each sample and standard, vortex and incubate at
room temperature for 5 to 45min. The protein-dye complex is stable for up to 60 minutes.
Step 1. Dissolve 20 gm sodium carbonate in 260 ml water, 0.4 gm cupric sulfate (5x
hydrated) in 20 ml water, and 0.2 gm sodium potassium tartrate in 20 ml water. Mix all
three solutions to prepare the copper reagent.
Step 2. Prepare 100 ml of a 1% solution (1 gm/100 ml) of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS).
Step 4. For the 2x Lowry concentrate mix 3 parts copper reagent with 1 part SDS and 1
part NaOH. Solution is stable for 2-3 weeks. Warm the solution to 37 degrees C if a white
10
precipitate forms, and discard if there is a black precipitate. Better, keep the three stock
solutions, and mix just before use.
Step 5. Prepare 0.2 N Folin reagent by mixing 10 ml 2 N Folin reagent with 90 ml water.
Kept in an amber bottle, the dilution is stable for several months.
Calculations:
A reagent blank should be run to subtract reagent nitrogen from the sample nitrogen.
where:
Corrected acid vol. = (mL std. acid for sample) – (mL std. acid for blank)
A factor is used to convert percent N to percent crude protein. Most proteins contain 16 %
N, so the conversion factor is 6.25 (100/16 = 6.25).
%𝑁 / 0. 16 = % 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑛 𝑂𝑅 %𝑁 × 6. 25 = %𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑛
Step 1. Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 is dissolved in 95% ethanol and acidified with
85% phosphoric acid.
Step 2. Samples containing proteins (1–100 μg/mL) and standard BSA solutions are mixed
with the Bradford reagent.
Step 4. Protein concentration in the sample is estimated from the BSA standard curve.
11
2.5.3. Lowry Method
Step 4. Freshly prepared Folin’s reagent is added and then the reaction mixture is mixed
and incubated at 50 °C for 10 min.
Calculations:
Sample Determination:
µg Protein = (µg of protein from the Standard curve) (df) df = Dilution factor
12
(µ𝑔 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑛)
µ𝑔 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑛/𝑚𝑙 = (𝑚𝑙 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒/𝑚𝑙 𝑅𝑒𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐷)
The Kjeldahl method was selected as an example of this analytical principle in this study
since it is still acknowledged by the AOAC International as the standard method for
determining dietary protein. Following the nitrogen determination, a conversion factor is used
to compute crude protein concentration. The original, and still widely used, conversion factor
6.25 is based on the premise that dietary proteins contain 16 percent nitrogen and that all
nitrogen in meals is linked to proteins. However, because relative nitrogen concentration
changes across amino acids and amino acid composition varies between dietary proteins, they
are only preliminary estimates.
Firstly, Kjeldahl Method not just protein AND, but total organic N is measured. It takes
a long time. Corrosive reagents are used. Precision is lower than with some other
approaches. In other words, this method does not measure actual protein, and
overestimations of protein can occur, because the normal nitrogen correction factor 6.25 is
used, and to calculate total protein content, species-specific conversion factors must be
used.
Secondly, the reagents in Bradford Dye-Binding method have a tendency to discolor the
test tubes. Because the stain would impact the absorbance result, the same test tubes could
not be used. This approach is also dependent on the passage of time. When more than one
solution is being tested, it is critical to ensure that each sample is incubated for the same
period of time in order to make valid comparisons. Additionally, this method works by
comparing the protein's absorbance to that of a reference protein. It is likely that the
concentration measured will be erroneous if the protein does not respond to the dye in the
same way as the reference protein.
Thirdly, Lowry method sensitive to low concentrations, the narrow pH range that it is
accurate in
13
In three methods, the Kjeldahl technique gives the highest protein levels in the majority of
samples, whereas the Lowry method showed greater results than the Bradford method.
3.2 Conclusion
In conclusion, the overestimation of protein content that results from estimating protein
from nitrogen poses a concern. One is the risk of food adulteration, as a high protein level
increases a product's economic worth. In other circumstances, the producer has added
non-protein nitrogen, such as melamine, to increase the apparent protein content and, as a
result, the commercial worth of the food product. This may threaten consumer food safety,
thus it's critical that such food adulteration is eliminated.
There are several methods for determining protein concentrations, each with its own set of
benefits and drawbacks. Because of the wide range of methodologies available, direct
comparisons between studies are challenging, and the analytical approach used should be
justified in light of the study's objectives. The results of this study revealed that protein
assessment based on nitrogen analysis overestimates protein amount in most dietary matrices
than that of amino acid analysis, whether or not species-specific conversion factors are
applied is debatable. To evaluate the protein content in foods, methods based on the specific
features of proteins and amino acids have been devised. The speed and sensitivity of the
various approaches differs.
14
REFERENCES
1. Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "protein summary". Encyclopedia
Britannica, 29 Apr. 2021, https://www.britannica.com/summary/protein.
2. Aryal, Sagar, and Saviour Delvin. “Proteins- Properties, Structure, Classification and
Functions - Biochemistry.” Microbe Notes, 26 July 2021,
https://microbenotes.com/proteins-properties-structure-classification-and-functions/
3. Khandelwal, P. (2021, August 12). Proteins - Physical & Chemical Properties |
A-Level Biology Revision Notes. A Level Biology.
https://alevelbiology.co.uk/notes/proteins-physical-chemical-properties/
4. Mæhre, Hanne K, et al. “Protein Determination-Method Matters.” Foods (Basel,
Switzerland), MDPI, 1 Jan. 2018,
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789268/
5. Nielsen, S. S. (2017). Food Analysis (Fifth Mæhre, H., Dalheim, L., Edvinsen, G.,
Elvevoll, E. and Jensen, I., 2018. Chapter 18, page 315-330
6. Tu, M., Cheng, S., Lu, W. and Du, M., 2018. Advancement and prospects of
bioinformatics analysis for studying bioactive peptides from food-derived protein:
Sequence, structure, and functions. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 105,
pp.7-17.
7. Chromý, V., Vinklárková, B., Šprongl, L. and Bittová, M., 2015. The Kjeldahl Method
as a Primary Reference Procedure for Total Protein in Certified Reference Materials
Used in Clinical Chemistry. I. A Review of Kjeldahl Methods Adopted by Laboratory
Medicine. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 45(2), pp.106-111.
8. Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N.J., Farr, A.L. and Randall, R.J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem.
193, 265-275.
9. Peterson, G.L. (1979) Analytical Biochemistry, 100, 201-220.
10. Ninfa, Alexander J; Ballou, David P; Benore, Marilee (2009). Fundamental
Laboratory Approaches for Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Wiley. p. 113.
15